economics of manure presented at farm management inservice october 1, 2008

53
Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Upload: julian-tyler

Post on 17-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Economics of Manure

Presented at

Farm Management Inservice

October 1, 2008

Page 2: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Kelvin LeiboldISU Farm Management

Field Specialist

[email protected]

641-648-4850

Page 3: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

What is going on in hog industry?

Slow down in growth Plain says 1.8% bigger YTD

Page 4: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

http://www.aaea.org/sections/extension/AnnualMeetingDocs/2008/2003Meyer.pdf

web.missouri.edu/~plainr/PowerPoints/HogOutlook8-07.ppt

Circovirus vaccine & death losses

China & pork exports

Weather and corn/sb prices

Slaughter capacity & Canadian production

What’s happening in Iowa hog belt?Slowing in growth of new construction

200 in 200680 in 200740 in 2008

Page 5: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Table 1Percent of U.S. Hogs Sold Through Various Pricing Arrangements, January 1999-2008*

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Hog or meat market formula

47.2 54.0 44.5 41.4 41.4 39.9 41.8 38.3 37.1

Other market formula 8.5 5.7 11.8 5.7 7.2 10.3 8.8 8.5 11.0

Other purchase arrangement

16.9 22.8 8.6 19.2 20.6 15.4 16.6 15.2 13.4

Packer-sold 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 6.7 6.1Packer-owned 16.4 18.1 17.1 21.4 20.0 22.7 23.1

Negotiated - spot 25.7 17.3 16.7 13.5 11.6 10.6 10.2 8.6 9.2               

*2006, 2007, and 2008 data were reported to USDA voluntarily; 2002 through 2005 data are based on USDA Mandatory reports; 1999-2001 are based on industry surveys by the Univ. of Missouri..

Table 1Percent of U.S. Hogs Sold Through Various Pricing Arrangements, January 1999-2008*

Source: Ron Plains

http://agebb.missouri.edu/mkt/vertstud08.htm

Page 6: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

http://www.agriculture.com/ag/story.jhtml?storyid=/templatedata/ag/story/data/1220544957474.xml

Good news is Canada gave up 73,000 sows

Buyout program to target 150,000 sows

Maybe reach 125,000

Top five have 200,000

Page 7: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Other issues

Will expansion continue?

Will Iowa remain the low cost corn state?

Will there be more consolidation in pork industry?

Will the demand remain for older barns?

Page 8: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Phosphate ---- $39.15

price per pound $0.87

pounds per acre 43 45

Potash ---- $52.50

price per pound $0.70

pounds per acre 72 75

48 bushels of soybeans following corn

Nitrogen ---- $117.60

price per pound $0.70

pounds per acre 168 168

Phosphate ---- $59.16

price per pound $0.87

pounds per acre 68 68

Potash ---- $37.80

price per pound $0.70

pounds per acre 54 54

180 bushel corn following soybeans

Total value of replacement N,P,K is $300

Page 9: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Nitrogen ---- $140.00

price per pound $0.70

pounds per acre 200

Phosphate ---- $55.68

price per pound $0.87

pounds per acre 64 64

Potash ---- $35.70

price per pound $0.70

pounds per acre 51 51

170 bu corn following corn

$230 worth of N,P, and K

Page 10: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008
Page 11: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

• Only one year agreement required• Banker may want it for as long as the loan• DeCoster has a few permanent• It attaches to the “deed to the ranch”• Usually written by the “other” attorney• Requires the landowner’s signature so often a

“three way”. Tenant, landowner, bldg, pig owner• Mays, shalls, will• Who pays what, where, when,

Manure easements and agreements

Page 12: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Costs associated with

Manure Management

Manure management plans

Storage

Manure transportation and application

Misc.

Page 13: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Manure Management Plans

Application permit - Matrix

Phosphorus Index

Annual DNR update fees

Page 14: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Storage Costs

Initial Construction – usually part of facility

Maintenance of facility

Maintenance of the grounds

Property taxes

Page 15: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Licensing fees

Liability insurance

Labor

Record Keeping

Fixed costs

Variable costs

Manure transportation and application

Page 16: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

$

Page 17: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM710.pdf

Estimating Farm Machinery Costs

Tractor $150,000,

purchase $140,000

New so 0 hours

Life 10 years

Interest rate 6%

500 hours a year, 225 hp., $13 labor

Page 18: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM710.pdf

Estimating Farm Machinery Costs

Manure Tank Wagon

$55,000 list ( now is $75,000)

$50,000 cost

New so 0 hours

Last 7 years

2000 acres

4 acres per hour

Page 19: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Other Costs

Licenses

Pickup

Pump and tractor

Additional labor

Moving from site to site

Page 20: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

$

Page 21: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008
Page 22: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Operating costsSee Machinery Spreadsheet

Importance of fixed costs on equipment

a) Seasonal leasing

b) Spring season

c) Other uses for tractors

Page 23: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Revenue

4 acres per hour (4.4 mph)

12 hours per day (70% eff.)

60 days per year

3500 gallons per acre (4,000 gal./acre)

$.009 per gallon ($.015 per gallon)

$75,600 per rig ($00,000 per rig)

Page 24: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

load unloadbase travel

extra travel time percentage

4 5 15 24

4 5 15 6 30 125%

Traveling one mile farther will increase time by 25%

Cost of TravelTime in Minutes

Assuming 20 mph travel speed, base distance equals 2 1/2 miles

Page 25: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

load unloadbase travel

extra travel time percentage

4 5 6 15

4 5 6 6 21 140%

Traveling one mile farther will increase time by 40%

Cost of TravelTime in Minutes

Assuming 20 mph travel speed, base distance equals one mile

Page 26: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Need to charge $12 per acre more when the acres per hour declines from 4 to 3.

Cost of fewer acres per hour

rate gals. acres/hr. income

$0.0100 3500 4 $140.00

$0.0133 3500 3 $140.00

$0.0033 3500 3 $35.00

$11.67

Page 27: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Need to charge $20 per acre more when the acres per hour declines from 4 to 3.

Cost of fewer acres per hour

rate gals. acres/hr. income

$0.015 4000 4 $240.00

$0.015 4000 3 $180.00

$0.005 4000 3 $60.00

$20.00

Page 28: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Conclusions

Travel time is a major factor in costs.

Need to run the numbers to see how it impacts your operation.

With the higher fertilizer prices it will pay to haul farther.

Page 29: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Placing a value on manure

Two schools of thought:

What ever the market will bear or

Nutrient Replacement Values

Page 30: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

What ever the market will bear.Based on supply, demand and transaction costs with discounts for potential limitations.

When demand increases and supply remains constant the value goes up if there aren’t competing substitutes.

Ex: Discussion about ethanol plants competing with feed mills if areas import corn and the trans-portation costs that could be associated with that.

Page 31: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Potential limitations

Uniformity of product

Correct Ratio of ingredients

Need all of the ingredients

Timeliness

Compaction

As well as benefits such as organic matter, slower release N and micro-nutrients .

Page 32: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

What ever the market will bear.Based on supply, demand and transaction costs with discounts for potential limitations.

When supply increases and demand remains constant the value goes down if there aren’t new uses.

Ex: If one area is over supplied, the buyers will be able to discount price. When the cost of exporting increases the local market price will decline further.

Page 33: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Nutrient Replacement Values2005

Nitrogen $.33 160 units = $52.80

Phosphorus $.31 100 units = $31

Potassium $.17 115 units = $19.55

Total value = $103.35

Assumes corn/soybean rotation with 170 and 44 bu. yields

Crop Removal Rates

Page 34: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Nutrient Replacement Values2009

Nitrogen $.70 160 units = $112

Phosphorus $.87 100 units = $87

Potassium $.70 115 units = $80

Total value = $280

Assumes corn/soybean rotation with 170 and 44 bu. yields

Crop Removal Rates

Page 35: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Nutrient Replacement Values2005

Nitrogen $.33 160 units = $52.80Phosphorus $.31 173 units = $53.63Potassium $.17 195 units = $33.15

Total value = $139.58

ISU Extension Pm-1811

4,339 gallons of hog manure – wet dry feeders 58-40-45

Note: this rate is above crop removal for nitrogen for a C/SB rotation. Potentially have lose of N from application.

Page 36: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Nutrient Replacement Values2005

Nitrogen $.33 145 units = $47.85Phosphorus $.31 100 units = $31.00Potassium $.17 112 units = $19.04

Total value = $97.89

ISU Extension Pm-1811

2,500 gallons of hog manure – wet dry feeders 58-40-45

Note: crop removal rate for phosphorus for a C/SB rotation.

Page 37: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Nutrient Replacement Values2009

Nitrogen $.70 145 units = $101Phosphorus $.87 100 units = $87Potassium $.70 112 units = $78

Total value = $266

ISU Extension Pm-1811

3,000 gallons of hog manure – wet dry feeders 50-35-35

Note: crop removal rate for phosphorus for a C/SB rotation.

Page 38: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

http://extension.agron.iastate.edu/soilfertility/nrate.aspx

Page 39: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

$

Page 40: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Manure Nutrient Calculator

Compares the value of commercial fertilizer with manure.

Estimates the acres needed.

Includes the Iowa P-Index formulas, summary report and landform maps.

Costs $10

Page 41: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008
Page 42: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Bob Koehler Extension Educator - Livestock Systems/Swine

University of Minnesota

William F. LazarusProfessor and Extension Economist

http://swroc.coafes.umn.edu/Bob/koehler_main_page.html

Page 43: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Bob Koehler – Southwest Research & Outreach Center, University of Minnesota

Bill Laser, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota

Page 44: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Bob Koehler – Southwest Research & Outreach Center, University of Minnesota

Bill Laser, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota

Page 45: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/livestock/xls/b1-65manurecalculator.xls

Page 46: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

http://www.agriculture.state.ia.us/APPLICATION8.htm

Page 47: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

http://www.agriculture.state.ia.us/APPLICATION8.htm

Page 48: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

http://www.agriculture.state.ia.us/APPLICATION8.htm

Page 49: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

FertilizersAccording to the Iowa Fertilizer Law (Chapter 200), the definition of fertilizer is “… any substance containing one or more recognized plant nutrient which is used for its plant nutrient content and which is designed for use and claimed to have value in promoting plant growth …” Fertilizers have a guaranteed analysis that is “… the minimum percentage of plant nutrients claimed and reported as total nitrogen (N), available phosphorus (P) or P2O5 or both, soluble potassium (K) or K2O or both …” According to the Fertilizer and Agricultural Lime Rule (Chapter 43), specific additional plant food elements beside N, P, and K can be guaranteed: calcium, magnesium, sulfur, boron, chlorine, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, sodium, and zinc. There is a minimum analysis requirement (Table 1). For mixed fertilizers, the sum of the guaranteed analysis of total N, available P2O5, and soluble K2O must be 20 percent or greater. Thus, materials below these levels cannot be registered as a fertilizer; however, this rule does not apply to specialty fertilizers for nonfarm use or materials ordinarily applied directly to plant foliage.

http://www.extension.iastate.edu/CropNews/2008/0916sawyer.htm

Page 50: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Soil conditionersAccording to Chapter 200, the definition of soil conditioner is “… any substance which when added to the soil or applied to plants will produce a favorable growth, yield or quality of crop or soil flora or fauna or other soil characteristics, other than a fertilizer, recognized pesticide, unmanipulated animal and vegetable manures or calcium and magnesium carbonate materials used primarily for correcting soil acidity.”  According to Chapter 43, product claims may be substantiated by one of two methods: 1) efficacy testing or 2) available research data relevant to Iowa crops and soils.

http://www.extension.iastate.edu/CropNews/2008/0916sawyer.htm

Page 51: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008
Page 52: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

Thank You!

Kelvin LeiboldFarm & Ag Business Management

Field SpecialistISU Hardin County Extension

524 LawlerIowa Falls, IA 50126(641) 648-4850

[email protected]/

Page 53: Economics of Manure Presented at Farm Management Inservice October 1, 2008

ISU Extension builds

partnerships and provides

research-based learning

opportunities to improve

quality of life in Iowa

Our Mission

We believe in . . .

• Quality

• Access

• Diversity

• Accountability