edible bean agronomy and pest management research results 2015 · this report is a compilation of...

EDIBLE BEAN

AGRONOMY

AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS

2015

C.L. GILLARD D. DEPUYDT E. LECLAIR

J. BRINKMAN K. McNAUGHTON

2

Table of Contents Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………………. 3 Weather Summary….………………………………………………………………..…… 4 Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………… 5 Navy Bean Variety Registration & Performance Trials ….…………………………….... 9 Black, Pinto and Small Red Registration & Performance Trials ……………………….. 11 Cranberry and Kidney Registration & Performance Trials ……………………………… 12 Narrow Row Preliminary Yield Trials ….……………………………………………….... 13 Wide Row Preliminary Yield Trials ………………………………………………………. 15 Marsh Spot Evaluations Trials ………………………………………………………….. 17 Anthracnose Foliar Fungicide Head-to-Head Trials ……………………….……………. 19 White Mold Dry Bean Foliar Fungicide Trials ………………………………………….. 21 White Mold Soybean Foliar Fungicide Trials …………………………………………… 23 Root Rot Seed Treatment Trials ………………………………..………………..……… 25 Planting Date Trials ………………………………………..……………………..……… 29 Cultivar Population Trials ………………………………………………………………… 33 Abstracts from Publications ……………………………………………………………... 37

3

Agronomy and Pest Management Research Results for Dry Edible Beans 2015

This report is a compilation of agronomy and pest management research results in dry edible beans at Ridgetown College and the Huron Research Station for 2015. It has been produced as a reference for growers and industry personnel. A number of the pesticides that are included in this report are not currently registered for use in dry edible beans in Ontario. Always follow label directions when applying pesticides.

Acknowledgments Funding for this research was received from: AAFC – Growing Forward II Pulse Cluster AAC – OFIP Programs Ontario Bean Growers Manitoba Pulse Growers Association Syngenta Crop Protection Engage Agro BASF Canada Bayer Crop Protection Norac Concepts Ayrsta LifeScience Loveland Products Canada Inc. Dupont Canada Hensall District Cooperative NuFarm Agriculture Inc.

The Bean Team Leader: Chris L. Gillard Field Technicians: Don Depuydt, Erin LeClair, Jonathan Brinkman, Kris McNaughton Graduate Students: Erin LeClair, Xinyu Zhang, Marina Nadj Student Assistance by: Sarah Irons, Colleen Crunican, Kathy Serle

Copyright by University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

Ridgetown Ontario Canada N0P 2C0 Telephone: (519) 674-1500 ext. 63632 Facimile (519)674-1600

4

2015 Heat Unit and Precipitation Summary for Exeter and Ridgetown.

2015 Weather Heat unit accumulation was above average in 2015, particularly in May and September. A killing frost occurred on October 17 at both sites. Above average heat in September and dry conditions resulted in rapid maturity and early harvest of a number of studies at both sites. The Huron Research Station had above average precipitation for the growing season, but monthly distribution fluctuated greatly. June and October were particularly wet months. Planting progress in June was sporadic, and a number of studies were planted after June 22. July and September had below average precipitation, and drought stress was noticeable in August and September. The Ridgetown Campus site had below average precipitation for 2015 but there were large fluctuations. May had above average precipitation, mostly due to 55 mm falling on May 31. June and October were also above average. July, August and September had below average precipitation, and drought stress was noticeable by mid-August.

Ontario Corn Heat Units (OCHU)

Huron Research (Exeter) Ridgetown Campus Norm Norm

Month 2015 (35 yr) 2015 (40 yr)

May 491 365 550 374

June 664 657 643 685

July 744 774 717 795

August 746 745 713 766

September 689 555 662 575

October 16 69 313 208

Total 3350 3158 3598 3403

Precipitation (mm)

Huron Research (Exeter) Ridgetown Campus

Norm Norm

Month 2015 (35 yr) 2015 (40 yr)

May 91 83 100 80

June 137 81 98 72

July 64 82 62 83

August 75 66 34 88

September 84 107 45 88

October 126 94 84 64

Total 577 513 423 475

20% or more below average

20% or more above average

5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Variety Registration and Performance Trials (ongoing) Four studies were seeded in 2015. The Kippen location was moved to a farm south of Exeter in 2015. Seeding was on schedule at Auburn (June 4) but was late at Exeter (June 22) due to excessive rainfall. The Exeter site had some minor damage from compaction prior to planting, which was managed at harvest with some plot harvest area adjustment. The Auburn site had some damage from excess rainfall in June, and the first replication was removed from the analysis of data. Canopy growth was good at both sites. A dry August limited white mold infection. Summary of Registration/Performance Trials, Huron Research Station, 2015 Location

Market Class Average Yield

C.V.

Notes

Auburn White 3586 6.6 Rep 1 removed from data analysis Exeter White 3087 13.5 Some microplotting due to compaction damage Exeter Cran/Kidney 2029 10.5 Some microplotting due to compaction damage Exeter Black/Pinto/SR 3334 7.4 Acceptable trial Preliminary Yield Trials (ongoing) Four studies were seeded in 2015 at Auburn, Exeter and Woodstock. A number of public and private breeding programs took part in the trials, including ADM, Agr. Canada/U of G, AmeriSeed (Co-op), Cooks, Cornell, Gen-Tec, HDC, Hyland, MSU, NDSU, Pro-Vita, Secan and Seminis. The primary site was at Exeter, and these trials were replicated at Auburn (narrow row only) and Woodstock (wide row only). There were 60entries tested. Entries by market class are as follows: navy (15 entries), DRK (4 entries), LRK (8 entries), WK (2 entries), Cran (5 entries), Black (9 entries), Otebo (3) and Small Red (4). Food-type soybean, Pink, Pinto classes had 1 entry each. Summary of Preliminary Yield Trials, Huron Research Station, 2015 Location

Market Class

Average Yield

C.V.

Notes

Auburn Navy/Black/Misc 3607 8.3 Acceptable trial, good yield Exeter Navy/Black/Misc 3711 9.5 Some microplotting due to compaction damage Exeter Cran/Kidney/Misc 2235 9.8 Acceptable trial Woodstock Cran/Kidney/Misc 1953 11.3 Acceptable trial Total Entries 60 distinct entries at 4 sites Black – Top yielding lines include Coop B04352, Zenith and BL12576. Navy – Top yielding lines include Fathom, Rexeter, HMS Medalist and NA12047. Small Red – Viper had the top yield.

6

Pink – Rosetta performed above average Otebo - Fuji was performed poorly at all locations Kidney – Majesty (DRK) and Inferno (LRK) had the highest yield at both sites Cranberry – ACUG 13-C1 had the highet yield at both sites. Evaluation of Marsh Spot in Dry Beans (Ongoing, Year 10) Background - Marsh spot is a physiological disorder found primarily in cranberry beans (occasionally in kidney beans). Cells in the centre of the coltyledons die and turn a gray/black colour (see Fig. 1). The damage is evident once the seed is split along the cotyledonary axis, and opened up to view the interior of the cotyledons. Marsh spot can create serious marketing issues for bean dealers. Marsh spot incidence was average in 2014. Registration/Performance Trials - Cranberry cultivars from trials at Exeter, Elora and St. Thomas locations were evaluated for marsh spot and compared to Etna (resistant check) and Messina (susceptible check). All of the lines tested were similar to the resistant check Etna except ACUG 15-C1 and Vero at the Elora site. Preliminary Yield Trials – Cranberry cultivars from trials at Exeter and Woodstock were evaluated. All the lines tested were similar to the resistant check Etna. Figure 1: Marsh Spot Severity Ratings

Anthracnose (ongoing) A spore suspension was used to inoculate disease free plants at the end of July. Disease pressure following inoculation was below average for the early planted study, and well below average for the late planted study. Some consistent treatment differences were recorded in the early planted study. Strobilurin fungicides were applied twice to maintain the treatment differences and prevent excessive disease development. Fluopyram and Vertisan had relatively high disease severity, while Quash had moderate disease severity, compared to other treatments. There were few treatment differences for yield, with only Allegro+Quadris, Acapela and BAS70320F having higher yield than the untreated check.

7

White Mold (ongoing) Two trials were planted in 2015, with moderate disease severity in the early planted study and moderately high disease severity in the late planted study. Allegro continues to be considered the industry standard for white mold fungicides. Senator, fludioxonil and the high rate of Propulse gave similar white mold control and yield. EAC 1407, a new liquid formulation of Senator, gave had similar yield and disease control as Senator. Priaxor + Lance and Acapela gave some white mold control but were weaker than the best fungicide treatments for yield. Poor performing products included Quash and Astound Granular. Root Rot Seed Treatment (ongoing) Fusarium - disease pressure was moderate, with treatment differences evident for emergence and plant vigour for the first 10-20 days . However, no differences in yield or 100 seed weight were observed. Rhizoctonia – disease pressure was moderate to severe. Treatment differences for emergence and vigour were observed for 20-34 days after plant emergence. Root rot inoculum reduced plant emergence by 20-30% in the inoculated check, compared to the uninoculated check. Most treatments were superior to the inoculated check (trt. 2) for emergence, vigour and yield, and some were superior to Cruiser Maxx Bean (trt. 3), the industry standard. The addition of Sedaxane to Rancona Summit gave dramatic increases in plant emergence, but the response of Sedaxane + Cruiser Maxx Bean was little better than Cruiser Maxx Bean alone. Evergol Energy had some of the highest plant emergence and vigour scores of any treatment. Planting Date Study (Year 2 of 2) Large Seed - Dark red kidney beans (cv. Red Hawk) were seeded on four dates (approx. 5/20, 5/30, 6/10 and 6/20) in two row widths (38 and 76 cm) and four populations (100%, 80%, 60%, and 40%) at two sites (Exeter and Ridgetown). The highest yields were measured with the June 1 planting date at Ridgetown, and at later planting dates at Exeter (due to heavy rainfall from June 6-18). Wide rows had approximately 10% lower yield at the Exeter site only. Yield was similar down to plant populations of 60%, but dropped by 15% at lower plant population in the narrow row plots at the Exeter site. Small Seed – Two cultivars (T9905 navy, Zorro black) were seeded on four dates (approx. 5/20, 5/30, 6/10 and 6/20) at four populations (100%, 80%, 60%, and 40%) at two sites (Exeter and Ridgetown). The highest yields were measured at the later planting dates in Exeter, likely due to heavy rainfall from June 6-18. No yield differences were measured at Ridgetown. Yield was similar down to plant populations of 60%. At a 40% plant population, yield losses of 14-19% were measured at Exeter only. Plant Population and Row Width Study (Year 2 of 2) Large Seed – Four cultivars (Hime otebo, Inferno LRK, Red Hawk DRK and Etna cran) were seeded in two row widths (38 and 76 cm) and four populations (100%, 80%, 60%, and 40%) at two sites (Exeter and Ridgetown). Small differences were observed between plant populations for plant height, plant dry weight and canopy cover. Row width did not impact yield at Ridgetown, but wide rows had higher yield at Exeter, which is contrary to conventional wisdom. At a 60% plant stand, a yield loss of 10% was measured at the Exeter location only. At a 40% plant stand, a yield loss of 19-30% was measured at Exeter and Ridgetown, respectively. Small Seed – Four cultivars (T9905 navy, Nautica navy, Rexeter navy and Zorro black) were seeded at four populations (100%, 80%, 60%, and 40%) at two sites (Exeter and Ridgetown).

8

Small differences were observed between plant populations for plant height, plant dry weight and canopy cover. A 40% plant stand resulted in a yield loss of 13-16%, at the Ridgetown and Exeter and locations, respectively.

2015 Navy Bean Registration and Performance Trial - Auburn

SeedYield Yield Yield Yield / Weight Days to CBB Lodging Harvestability

No. Name Rank (kg/ha) Index Maturity (g/100) Maturity (%) (1-5, 1=low) (1-5, 1=good)1 Apex 13 3651 102 32 25.0 113.0 0.3 1.3 3.12 Nautica 15 3610 101 31 20.7 116.0 0.3 2.3 3.63 Merlin 4 3915 109 34 22.2 115.3 3.0 2.0 3.54 HMS Medalist 2 3956 110 36 19.8 111.0 2.0 2.0 3.45 Vigilant 24 3487 97 31 22.4 112.8 2.3 1.5 3.46 Bolt 28 3199 89 30 25.0 107.8 2.3 0.8 3.57 Fathom 12 3677 103 31 25.9 117.5 0.8 1.8 3.38 Lightning 27 3258 91 29 24.4 111.8 5.8 1.5 3.49 Mist 23 3489 97 30 24.6 116.8 0.3 2.0 3.610 Rexeter 8 3734 104 32 22.4 116.0 0.8 1.5 3.311 Lighthouse 11 3683 103 32 24.6 113.8 2.0 1.8 3.612 OAC Thunder 22 3498 98 33 25.2 106.5 2.8 1.3 3.513 AC Compass 30 2966 83 27 16.8 108.8 2.3 1.8 3.014 ACUG 13-1 9 3709 103 31 24.0 118.8 1.3 2.0 3.315 ob 1723-06 7 3762 105 31 20.9 120.5 1.3 2.3 3.316 T9903 19 3529 98 31 20.7 112.5 1.5 1.8 3.517 T9905 3 3939 110 35 25.5 112.5 1.5 2.3 3.518 o8072 6 3807 106 33 22.8 117.0 1.0 2.3 3.519 ACUG 13-3 26 3259 91 29 24.1 112.8 1.5 1.3 3.320 ACUG 14-1 14 3639 101 33 26.3 109.8 1.3 1.3 3.821 ACUG14-3 17 3550 99 31 26.4 115.0 0.5 2.0 3.822 ACUG 14-4 21 3498 98 31 23.0 113.8 0.5 1.5 3.423 ACUG14-6 20 3527 98 31 24.2 115.3 1.3 1.6 3.724 ACUG 15-1 29 3113 87 28 22.7 113.0 1.0 1.0 3.525 ACUG 15-2 5 3869 108 34 22.9 113.5 1.3 2.5 3.126 ACUG 15-3 25 3372 94 29 21.4 117.0 0.0 2.0 3.427 ACUG 15-4 10 3705 103 33 23.6 111.8 1.8 1.8 3.828 ACUG 15-5 18 3534 99 32 23.3 109.0 2.5 2.4 3.229 IG-10M 16 3573 100 32 25.7 111.5 1.0 1.3 3.430 DS105W0 1 4082 114 36 25.3 112.3 1.5 3.8 3.1

Mean 3586 100 32 23.4 113.4 1.5 1.8 3.4C.V. 6.6 2.9 3.7 92.7 26.4 7.6

PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05 333 0.9 5.9 2.0 0.7 0.4

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Fertilizer: 55-60-90-1S-1.5Zn lbs/ac actual springRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (38 cm) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Rival 2.0 L/ha, Dual 1.25 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 1.0 L/ha Reflex, 0.6 L/ha Venture, 0.5 % v/v applied 29 JunePlot Length: 6 m Planting Date: June 4Harvest Length: 4.8 m. Fungicide: Cygon,Silencer,Headline,ReLeaf, Lance ( July 22 )Seeding Rate: 17 seeds/m Silencer, Headline, Allegro ( August 4 )Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx + Dynasty Quadris, Senator, Silencer ( August 14 )

Clip and Belt Thresh: 4 Sept - 24 Sept

9

2015 Navy Bean Registration and Performance Trial - Exeter

SeedYield Yield Yield Yield / Weight Days to CBB Lodging Harvestability

No. Name Rank (kg/ha) Index Maturity (g/100) Maturity (%) (1-5, 1=low) (1-5, 1=good)1 Apex 3 3485 113 31 24.2 114.0 0.8 1.8 3.62 Nautica 30 2594 84 23 18.3 113.3 2.5 1.3 3.43 Merlin 14 3112 101 27 19.1 113.5 11.3 3.0 3.34 HMS Medalist 10 3217 104 28 18.1 113.3 4.3 2.3 3.15 Vigilant 23 2873 93 26 19.0 111.0 8.3 1.0 3.56 Bolt 28 2643 86 25 23.4 105.8 13.3 1.8 3.57 Fathom 20 2977 96 26 22.5 113.0 1.8 2.3 3.18 Lightning 27 2744 89 26 21.3 105.5 8.5 2.3 3.49 Mist 2 3530 114 31 22.3 114.3 1.3 2.5 3.410 Rexeter 1 3671 119 32 20.7 114.0 1.5 2.5 3.111 Lighthouse 6 3363 109 30 22.0 112.8 2.5 2.3 3.312 OAC Thunder 24 2829 92 26 22.8 110.5 9.3 2.0 3.013 AC Compass 25 2777 90 24 15.7 113.5 5.5 4.8 2.314 ACUG 13-1 19 2997 97 26 21.9 114.8 0.3 2.5 3.115 ob 1723-06 12 3195 103 28 17.1 114.5 10.3 3.5 2.916 T9903 15 3100 100 28 18.4 111.0 9.0 2.0 3.317 T9905 9 3255 105 29 21.1 111.0 5.5 2.3 3.118 o8072 7 3302 107 29 19.1 114.5 6.5 1.8 3.319 ACUG 13-3 4 3395 110 31 22.6 110.8 5.3 1.8 3.520 ACUG 14-1 5 3368 109 31 24.5 110.0 0.8 1.5 3.421 ACUG14-3 8 3273 106 29 23.3 113.5 0.8 2.0 3.622 ACUG 14-4 26 2769 90 25 21.5 112.3 0.3 1.5 3.423 ACUG14-6 13 3190 103 28 23.8 115.3 2.8 2.0 3.824 ACUG 15-1 18 3025 98 27 21.6 111.3 1.3 1.8 3.625 ACUG 15-2 16 3096 100 28 20.0 109.8 8.8 3.3 2.926 ACUG 15-3 11 3211 104 29 18.7 112.5 0.0 1.8 3.427 ACUG 15-4 17 3085 100 27 20.6 112.3 2.3 2.0 3.528 ACUG 15-5 22 2941 95 27 20.2 110.3 7.5 3.0 2.929 IG-10M 29 2624 85 25 24.1 107.0 10.3 1.8 3.530 DS105W0 21 2977 96 26 20.7 114.5 5.0 4.5 2.8

Mean 3087 100 28 21.0 112.0 4.9 2.3 3.3C.V. 13.5 3.2 1.7 39.8 24.9 8.2

PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05 589 1.0 2.7 2.8 0.8 0.4

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Fertilizer: 0-20-100 lbs applied and ploughed in fallRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (38 cm) 20 gal/ac UAN ppiNumber of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit .25 L/ha, Frontier .74 L/ha & Prowl 2.5 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Manual weed control as necessaryPlot Length: 6 m Planting Date: June 22Harvest Length: 4.8 m. Fungicide:Cygon,Silencer,Headline,ReLeaf, Lance ( August 5 )Seeding Rate: 17 seeds/m Quadris, Senator, Silencer ( August 13 )Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx + Dynasty Allegro, Quadris, Silencer ( Aug 24 )

Direct Harvest Date: 12 Oct

10

2015 Black, Pinto and SR Registration and Performance Trial - Exeter

SeedMarket Yield Yield Yield Yield / Weight Days to CBB Lodging Harvestability

No. Name Class Rank (kg/ha) Index Maturity (g/100) Maturity (%) (1-5, 1=low) (1-5, 1=good)1 Zorro Black 4 3505 110 31 21.7 112.3 2.5 1.1 1.52 Viper (09303) SR 2 3559 112 35 30.3 102.3 5.3 1.5 1.93 Ruby SR 9 3353 105 32 31.9 104.0 9.5 3.5 4.04 Merlot SR 15 3041 96 30 35.6 101.8 11.0 2.3 2.85 La Paz Pinto 8 3364 106 33 36.7 103.3 6.3 2.3 2.86 GTS 1103 Black 1 3780 119 33 21.0 113.3 4.5 2.3 2.57 ACUG13-SR1 SR 13 3130 98 28 22.9 113.0 3.8 1.6 2.18 ACUG 15-B2 Black 5 3457 109 32 22.4 109.0 0.6 1.8 2.49 ACUG 15-B1 Black 16 2954 93 30 23.1 98.5 11.3 1.3 1.610 ACUG 15-B4 Black 3 3550 112 31 22.5 116.3 0.6 2.1 2.011 ACUG 15-B3 Black 10 3305 104 29 23.8 115.3 3.3 2.0 2.112 ACUG 15-P2 Pinto 7 3391 107 30 43.1 112.0 5.0 2.0 2.613 ACUG 15-P3 Pinto 11 3246 102 30 35.9 108.0 7.3 2.6 3.314 ACUG 15-P1 Pinto 12 3212 101 32 44.8 101.3 7.5 1.6 1.915 ACUG 15-NDP1 Pinto 14 3090 97 27 41.6 114.3 5.3 2.1 2.616 Zenith Black 6 3399 107 30 21.8 114.0 4.0 1.0 1.8

Mean Mean 3334 105 31 29.9 108.7 5.5 1.9 2.4C.V. 7.4 3.5 1.8 57.1 19.1 11.0

PR>F PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD (0.05) LSD(0.05 335 1.5 2.8 4.5 0.8 1.0

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Fertilizer: 0-20-100 lbs applied and ploughed in fallRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (38 cm) 20 gal/ac UAN ppiNumber of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit .25 L/ha, Frontier .74 L/ha & Prowl 2.5 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Manual weed control as necessaryPlot Length: 6 m Planting Date: June 22Harvest Length: 4 m FungicideCygon,Silencer,Headline,ReLeaf, Lance ( August 5 )Seeding Rate: 17 seeds/m Quadris, Senator, Silencer ( August 13 )Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx + Dynasty Allegro, Quadris, Silencer ( Aug 24 )

Harvest Date: 15 Sept - 12 Oct

C.V.

11

2015 Cran and Kidney Bean Registration and Performance - Exeter

SeedMarket Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Weight Days to CBB Lodging Harvestability

No. Name Class Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (g/100) Maturity (%) (1-5, 1=low) (1-5, 1=good)1 Red Rider Cran 9 2032 100 20 62.0 103.8 6.0 2.3 3.02 Dynasty DRK 4 2262 111 22 70.3 103.5 10.0 2.8 2.53 ACUG13-C1 Cran 2 2384 118 24 63.3 101.3 4.0 2.0 2.84 OAC Inferno LRK 1 2483 122 24 70.1 103.5 8.8 3.3 2.55 Yeti WK 11 1973 97 19 60.1 103.8 10.0 2.5 3.36 Majesty DRK 3 2286 113 22 74.9 101.8 7.8 3.0 2.87 Etna Cran 15 1828 90 19 62.6 97.0 7.5 1.5 2.88 Red Hawk DRK 18 1566 77 16 58.2 100.3 5.8 2.0 1.89 Pink Panther LRK 16 1778 88 19 66.3 92.0 7.8 2.3 2.310 GTS 104 DRK 14 1848 91 18 59.0 105.3 10.8 2.5 3.011 ACUG 14-C2 Cran 5 2215 109 23 71.3 98.3 6.5 2.0 2.012 ACUG 15-L1 LRK 13 1856 91 18 66.2 103.8 7.5 2.5 2.813 ACUG 15-C1 Cran 12 1887 93 19 62.4 102.0 6.5 1.8 2.314 ACUG 15-C2 Cran 8 2046 101 20 65.0 102.5 9.8 1.8 2.515 ACUG 15-D1 DRK 6 2170 107 21 72.9 102.0 7.5 3.3 2.516 ACUG 15-D2 DRK 7 2136 105 21 63.8 103.3 13.3 1.8 2.817 Vero Cran 10 2009 99 20 64.6 101.8 8.5 2.3 2.018 Red Rover (filler) 17 1764 87 18 61.7 98.0 11.3 2.8 1.5

Mean 2029 100 20 65.3 101.3 8.3 2.4 2.5C.V. 10.5 3.3 1.0 30.4 23.5 13.8PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 303 3.1 1.5 3.6 0.8 0.8

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Fertilizer: 0-20-100 lbs applied and ploughed in fallRow Width: Narrow = 30 inch (76 cm) 20 gal/ac UAN ppiNumber of Rows Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit .25 L/ha, Frontier .74 L/ha & Prowl 2.5 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Manual weed control as necessaryPlot Length: 6 m Planting Date: June 22Harvest Length: 4m. Fungicide: Cygon,Silencer,Headline,ReLeaf, Lance ( August 5 )Seeding Rate: 17 seeds/m Quadris, Senator, Silencer ( August 13 )Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx + Dynasty Allegro, Quadris, Silencer ( Aug 24 )

Harvest Date: 15 Sept - 12 Oct

12

2015 Narrow Row Dry Bean Preliminary Yield Trial (PYT) - Auburn


No. Name Class Rank (kg/ha) Index Maturity (g/100) Maturity (%) (1-5, 1=low) (1-5, 1=good)1 Apex Navy 10 3708 103 35 25.6 105.8 0.8 1.6 2.02 HMS Medalist Navy 2 4104 114 39 20.4 104.5 3.8 1.8 2.33 Rexeter Navy 3 4016 111 38 21.8 106.8 0.3 1.5 2.04 T9905 Navy 15 3662 102 36 22.8 102.3 5.3 1.6 1.85 Mist (ACUG 10-6) Navy 26 3399 94 33 22.5 102.3 1.3 1.3 2.06 Bolt Navy 30 3252 90 32 24.6 101.3 4.8 1.3 1.47 Fathom (12-5) Navy 16 3657 101 35 24.3 104.0 1.3 1.5 2.18 ACUG 12-3 Navy 32 3203 89 30 24.5 106.0 2.5 1.6 1.89 ACUG13-1 Navy 21 3520 98 33 22.8 106.3 1.0 1.8 2.110 SEMN1200(SV1893GH) Navy 23 3443 95 34 25.3 101.5 2.3 1.4 2.011 Alpena (N11283) Navy 24 3435 95 34 21.0 101.0 3.3 1.0 1.512 COOPN08070 Navy 22 3514 97 35 20.9 100.3 7.0 1.6 1.913 NA12047 Navy 7 3808 106 38 19.2 101.3 3.0 1.3 2.014 COOPN06063 Navy 20 3526 98 34 23.2 102.3 4.0 2.1 2.415 NA12051 Navy 5 3965 110 38 18.8 104.0 5.3 2.0 2.016 Zorro Black 13 3682 102 37 23.1 100.5 1.3 1.4 1.617 Shania Black 8 3776 105 36 23.6 105.3 2.8 2.0 2.118 SEMB1312(SV6894GB) Black 19 3531 98 35 25.7 101.8 1.0 1.3 1.519 Zenith (B10244) Black 12 3696 102 37 24.8 100.5 1.5 1.3 1.420 COOPB04352 Black 9 3763 104 37 19.7 101.5 3.5 1.6 1.921 BL12576 Black 1 4185 116 40 23.2 105.3 4.0 1.6 1.822 B8006282 Black 25 3422 95 35 23.0 97.8 1.3 1.4 1.623 B0043647 Black 31 3225 89 32 24.5 101.8 1.5 1.5 1.824 B0042613 Black 14 3676 102 35 21.5 104.5 0.8 1.5 2.025 S03-W4 Soybean 29 3286 91 27 22.3 123.8 0.0 0.5 1.026 Fuji Otebo 33 3067 85 29 34.5 107.5 2.3 3.1 4.127 Merlot SR 28 3340 93 34 39.5 99.0 9.5 2.5 2.928 Viper (09303) SR 6 3932 109 39 33.7 100.8 2.3 2.2 2.329 PROVR11511 SR 11 3697 102 37 42.0 100.5 3.4 2.5 3.130 R12844 SR 17 3615 100 38 37.2 95.0 4.2 1.5 2.431 Rosetta Pink 4 3970 110 39 40.0 101.3 2.8 2.6 3.132 La Paz Pinto 18 3585 99 36 37.9 99.8 7.8 2.3 3.233 Hime (filler) Otebo 27 3376 94 33 32.5 102.3 5.3 2.6 3.6

Mean Mean 3607 100 35 26.3 103.0 3.1 1.7 2.1C.V. 8.3 5.8 2.7 82.1 25.3 16.8

PR>F PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD (0.05) LSD(0.05 417 2.1 3.9 3.5 0.6 0.5

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Fertilizer: 55-60-90-1S-1.5Zn lbs/ac actual springRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (38 cm) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Rival 2.0 L/ha, Dual 1.25 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 1.0 L/ha Reflex, 0.6 L/ha Venture, 0.5 % v/v applied 29 JunePlot Length: 6 m Planting Date: June 4Harvest Length: 4 m Fungicide: Cygon,Silencer,Headline,ReLeaf, Lance ( July 22 )Seeding Rate: 17 seeds/m Silencer, Headline, Allegro ( August 4 )Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx + Dynasty Quadris, Senator, Silencer ( August 14 )

Clip and Belt Thresh: 4 Sept - 24 Sept

C.V.

13

2015 Narrow Row Dry Bean Preliminary Yield Trial (PYT) - Exeter


No. Name Class Rank (kg/ha) Index Maturity (g/100) Maturity (%) (1-5, 1=low) (1-5, 1=good)1 Apex Navy 3 4104 111 35 24.9 116.0 0.8 1.9 2.12 HMS Medalist Navy 17 3728 100 33 18.6 112.8 8.0 2.0 2.13 Rexeter Navy 12 3879 105 33 21.9 116.5 0.1 1.9 2.14 T9905 Navy 7 3919 106 35 22.5 113.0 3.8 2.5 2.55 Mist (ACUG 10-6) Navy 20 3670 99 32 22.1 113.5 0.3 1.6 2.36 Bolt Navy 26 3588 97 33 25.3 108.8 10.0 1.5 1.57 Fathom (12-5) Navy 1 4398 119 38 24.4 116.3 1.3 2.0 2.08 ACUG 12-3 Navy 14 3852 104 34 23.8 112.3 1.0 2.0 2.39 ACUG13-1 Navy 22 3662 99 31 21.9 117.0 1.1 2.0 2.510 SEMN1200(SV1893GH) Navy 18 3719 100 32 24.5 115.5 6.3 1.6 1.911 Alpena (N11283) Navy 15 3817 103 34 19.0 111.8 7.0 1.8 2.112 COOPN08070 Navy 23 3655 98 32 19.8 112.8 6.3 2.1 2.413 NA12047 Navy 21 3666 99 32 18.0 113.0 9.3 1.6 1.614 COOPN06063 Navy 5 4048 109 35 22.0 114.3 6.5 2.1 2.315 NA12051 Navy 25 3639 98 34 16.8 107.3 11.8 1.6 2.016 Zorro Black 8 3917 106 34 21.7 115.0 3.8 1.6 1.917 Shania Black 19 3676 99 31 20.7 117.5 3.5 1.9 2.018 SEMB1312(SV6894GB) Black 13 3872 104 35 23.0 109.5 3.0 1.5 1.919 Zenith (B10244) Black 2 4288 116 37 21.5 115.0 2.3 1.1 1.620 COOPB04352 Black 4 4064 110 37 17.1 110.5 8.0 2.1 2.121 BL12576 Black 31 3189 86 27 19.7 116.5 11.8 1.6 1.922 B8006282 Black 28 3431 92 32 19.2 108.0 2.8 1.4 1.823 B0043647 Black 29 3250 88 29 21.5 111.5 5.3 1.8 2.024 B0042613 Black 27 3462 93 30 18.0 115.8 2.8 1.3 1.925 S03-W4 Soybean 16 3785 102 31 21.4 121.3 0.0 0.5 1.026 Fuji Otebo 33 2697 73 24 30.3 110.8 11.0 3.4 3.627 Merlot SR 30 3237 87 31 37.1 104.8 14.5 2.0 2.428 Viper (09303) SR 11 3885 105 36 32.0 107.8 7.0 2.1 2.129 PROVR11511 SR 10 3903 105 38 38.6 103.5 11.8 3.1 2.930 R12844 SR 6 3949 106 39 36.9 102.5 0.3 1.9 2.531 Rosetta Pink 9 3909 105 34 35.4 116.0 4.3 1.6 2.032 La Paz Pinto 24 3647 98 34 37.5 106.0 3.8 2.1 2.333 Hime (filler) Otebo 32 2972 80 27 34.8 112.0 11.3 3.1 3.5

Mean Mean 3711 100 33 24.6 112.3 5.5 1.9 2.2C.V. 9.5 4.1 2.1 47.2 15.1 11.1

PR>F PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD (0.05) LSD(0.05 492 1.4 3.2 3.6 0.4 0.3

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Fertilizer: 0-20-100 lbs applied and ploughed in fallRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (38 cm) 20 gal/ac UAN ppiNumber of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit .25 L/ha, Frontier .74 L/ha & Prowl 2.5 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Manual weed control as necessaryPlot Length: 6 m Planting Date: June 22Harvest Length: 4 m Fungicide: Cygon,Silencer,Headline,ReLeaf, Lance ( August 5 )Seeding Rate: 17 seeds/m Quadris, Senator, Silencer ( August 13 )Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx + Dynasty Allegro, Quadris, Silencer ( Aug 24 )

Direct Harvest Date: 13 Oct

C.V.

14

2015 Wide Row Dry Bean Preliminary Yield Trial (PYT) - Exeter


No. Name Class Rank (kg/ha) Index Maturity (g/100) Maturity (%) (1-5, 1=low) (1-5, 1=good)1 Inferno LRK 9 2426 109 23 70.6 104.8 10.8 2.1 3.42 Clouseau (SEM07146) LRK 15 2079 93 20 73.4 103.5 5.5 1.9 3.53 Pink Panther LRK 18 2043 91 21 70.1 98.3 6.5 1.6 3.54 Big Red (09351) LRK 25 1879 84 19 67.3 99.8 9.8 1.5 3.65 9378 LRK 21 1970 88 21 70.2 96.0 11.3 1.9 4.06 9357 LRK 16 2059 92 22 67.1 92.3 10.0 1.8 4.17 9363 LRK 17 2056 92 23 67.2 90.8 8.0 1.6 4.08 Rosie LRK 23 1944 87 18 57.8 106.5 3.3 1.8 3.49 Majesty DRK 5 2716 122 26 80.7 103.8 3.8 2.1 3.410 Dynasty (OAC 07-6D1) DRK 13 2214 99 21 68.8 103.0 11.0 1.5 3.111 Red Rover DRK 27 1650 74 17 63.3 99.8 13.0 1.8 3.612 Talon DRK 24 1928 86 18 61.2 105.3 2.5 1.6 4.013 Bellagio Cran 11 2216 99 20 58.8 112.8 3.8 3.1 3.414 Etna Cran 10 2249 101 22 66.9 103.0 4.8 1.6 3.515 ACUG 13-C1 Cran 8 2438 109 24 65.8 103.3 3.0 1.5 3.416 ACUG14-C2 Cran 14 2118 95 21 67.0 102.5 11.0 1.0 2.917 Chianti Cran 12 2216 99 21 66.8 107.5 3.3 2.1 3.318 La Paz Pinto 4 2764 124 27 37.5 103.0 2.3 2.4 3.319 Fuji Otebo 22 1949 87 19 31.9 102.5 15.3 2.8 4.120 Hime Otebo 6 2708 121 26 34.1 105.3 10.0 2.8 4.121 Samurai (G12901) Otebo 7 2562 115 24 29.2 108.8 12.8 1.9 2.522 Apex Navy 1 2981 133 27 26.9 109.5 0.0 1.9 2.023 Viper SR 2 2910 130 28 30.8 104.5 5.8 1.8 2.424 Zorro Black 3 2769 124 25 21.6 112.3 3.3 1.5 2.325 Yeti (ACUG 10-W1) WK 26 1866 83 18 61.0 105.0 8.0 1.8 3.426 Snowdon WK 19 2026 91 22 68.5 91.8 8.5 1.8 3.527 T9905 (filler) Navy 20 2005 90 20 58.4 101.5 9.5 2.0 3.6

Mean 2235 100 22 59.2 102.8 7.4 1.9 3.5C.V. 9.8 3.7 3.1 46.6 15.7 10.3PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.0 310 3.0 4.5 4.8 0.4 0.5

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Fertilizer: 0-20-100 lbs applied and ploughed in fallRow Width: Narrow = 30 inch (76 cm) 20 gal/ac UAN ppiNumber of Rows Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit .25 L/ha, Frontier .74 L/ha & Prowl 2.5 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Manual weed control as necessaryPlot Length: 6 m Planting Date: June 22Harvest Length: 4m Fungicide: Cygon,Silencer,Headline,ReLeaf, Lance ( August 5 )Seeding Rate: 17 seeds/m Quadris, Senator, Silencer ( August 13 )Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx + Dynasty Allegro, Quadris, Silencer ( Aug 24 )

Harvest Dates: 15 Sept - 12 Oct

15

2015 Wide Row Dry Bean Preliminary Yield Trial (PYT) - Woodstock

Market Yield Yield Yield Yield / Days to HarvestabilityNo. Name Class Rank (kg/ha) Index Maturity Maturity (1-5, 1=good)1 Inferno LRK 6 2342 120 24 98.8 2.92 Clouseau (SEM07146) LRK 18 1714 88 17 100.8 3.33 Pink Panther LRK 22 1653 85 17 97.3 3.34 Big Red (09351) LRK 15 1757 90 18 95.5 3.55 9378 LRK 23 1640 84 17 95.5 3.96 9357 LRK 24 1545 79 17 92.5 3.87 9363 LRK 25 1459 75 16 92.5 4.08 Rosie LRK 13 1939 99 19 102.3 3.09 Majesty DRK 1 2688 138 27 99.0 3.010 Dynasty (OAC 07-6D1) DRK 8 2076 106 21 98.3 3.411 Red Rover DRK 19 1713 88 17 98.3 3.312 Talon DRK 20 1709 87 17 99.8 3.513 Bellagio Cran 14 1912 98 20 96.8 3.814 Etna Cran 17 1714 88 18 94.0 3.515 ACUG 13-C1 Cran 4 2473 127 26 95.8 3.016 ACUG14-C2 Cran 11 1983 102 20 96.8 3.517 Chianti Cran 16 1740 89 17 100.8 3.518 La Paz Pinto 2 2580 132 26 100.3 2.619 Fuji Otebo 26 1304 67 13 102.0 5.020 Hime Otebo 21 1701 87 17 101.3 4.521 Samurai (G12901) Otebo 10 2014 103 20 100.5 2.822 Apex Navy 7 2215 113 22 102.8 2.823 Viper SR 3 2505 128 25 101.5 2.824 Zorro Black 5 2378 122 24 100.3 2.625 Yeti (ACUG 10-W1) WK 9 2061 106 20 102.3 3.126 Snowdon WK 12 1955 100 20 96.5 3.0

Mean 1953 100 20 98.6 3.3C.V. 11.3 1.7 13.4PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 313 2.4 0.6

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Fertilizer: 10-40-40 actual kg/ha applied in springRow Width: Narrow = 30 inch (76 cm) Herbicide:ppi: Pursuit 200ml/ha, Frontier 900 ml/haNumber of Rows Per Plot: 2 post: Basagran 2.25 L/ha, Excel Super 0.67 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Planting Date: May 29, 2015Plot Length: 6 m Fungicide: Allegro 1 L/ha, Quadris 0.5L/haHarvest Length: 4m July 10, Aug 6Seeding Rate: 20 seeds/m Harvest Dates: Sept 15, 2015Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx + Dynasty

16

Marsh Spot Analysis - Cranberry Entries to Major Coloured Bean Performance Test 2014

TrtNo Treatment Name1 ACUG 13-C1 4.0 b 1.5 0.05 6.8 b 1.9 b 0.14 b 4.5 b 2.5 a 0.11 b 4.5 b 1.2 bc 0.06 b 5.0 1.78 0.09

2 ACUG 14-C1 1.5 b 1.3 0.02 5.3 b 1.5 bc 0.09 bc 1.0 b 1.3 b 0.02 b 9.8 b 1.1 bc 0.11 b 4.4 1.30 0.06

3 ACUG 14-C2 3.8 b 0.8 0.03 2.5 b 1.2 c 0.03 c 3.8 b 1.2 b 0.06 b 4.5 b 0.7 c 0.06 b 3.7 0.98 0.05

4 Red Rider 2.3 b 1.0 0.03 4.0 b 1.3 bc 0.06 bc 5.5 b 1.7 b 0.11 b 6.5 b 1.0 bc 0.08 b 4.6 1.25 0.07

5 Etna (Commercial Check) 1.8 b 1.0 0.04 2.8 b 1.8 bc 0.06 bc 5.8 b 1.3 b 0.12 b 3.5 b 2.3 a 0.07 b 3.5 1.60 0.07

6 Messina (Susceptible Check) 7.0 b 1.7 0.14 51.8 a 2.9 a 1.46 a 26.0 a 2.8 a 0.71 a 39.5 a 1.5 ab 0.60 a 31.1 2.23 0.73Mean 8.7 1.51 0.18

CVPR>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)

o Major Coloured Bean Performance Test 2015

Exeter EloraTrtNo Treatment Name1 Red Rider 2.3 bc 1.1 0.06 bc 2.0 b 0.80 c 0.02 c 0.0 c 0.00 b 0.00 c 1.4 0.6 0.0 3.0 0.94 0.05

2 ACUG 13-C1 3.5 bc 1.5 0.05 bc 9.5 a 1.90 bc 0.20 bc 1.0 bc 0.80 ab 0.01 c 4.7 1.4 0.1 4.8 1.6 0.1

3 Etna (Commercial Check) 0.3 c 0.5 0.01 c 1.8 b 1.00 c 0.02 c 0.0 c 0.00 b 0.00 c 0.7 0.5 0.0 2.1 1.1 0.0

4 ACUG 14-C2 2.5 bc 1.7 0.04 bc 7.5 ab 1.60 c 0.13 c 0.0 c 0.00 b 0.00 c 3.3 1.1 0.1 3.5 1.0 0.1

5 ACUG 15-C1 1.5 bc 2.6 0.04 bc 11.5 a 3.00 a 0.35 ab 5.8 b 1.70 ab 0.12 b 6.3 2.4 0.2

6 ACUG 15-C2 0.0 c 0.0 0.00 c 2.5 b 1.40 c 0.05 c 1.8 bc 0.80 ab 0.06 c 1.4 0.7 0.0

7 Vero 5.5 bc 1.7 0.13 bc 13.8 a 2.80 ab 0.38 a 0.5 c 0.30 b 0.01 c 6.6 1.6 0.2

8 Messina (Susceptible Check) 24.0 a 2.2 0.54 a 16.8 a 1.80 a 0.32 a 20.4 2.0 0.4 25.7 2.1 0.6Mean 5.0 1.3 0.1

CVPR>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)

NotMarsh spot is a physiological disorder in large seeded (Andean type) beans, primarily cranberry beans. Symptoms include a discolouring of tissue (brown/black) in the centre of the seed and can be observed when the seed is split along the cotelydonary axis. Seed of all cranberry cultivars and breeding lines were assessed for marsh spot, and compared to the cultivar Messina (susceptible check)

Conclusions:In 2014, moderate levels of marsh spot were detected at Elora, and high levels were detected at KippenIn 2014, Messina had the highest levels of marsh spot (incidence x severity). In 2015, moderate levels of marsh spot were detected at Exeter, Elora and St. ThomasIn 2015, Messina had the highest levels of marsh spot (incidence x severity), but significant levels of marsh spot were detected in the cultivars ACUG 15-C1 and Vero at Elora

6.9 1.4 0.1

Incidence Severity Incid X Sev% (0-5) (0-5)

2 Year Average

AverageIncidence Severity Incid X Sev

% (0-5) (0-5)

%

103.8 120.73.2 0.67

(0-5)

128.70.06

AverageIncidence Severity Incid X Sev

(0-5) (0-5)Incid X Sev

(0-5)Incidence Severity

St. Thomas

% (0-5)Incid X Sev

(0-5)

58.2 82.8 75.5 65.81.44.9 6.9 1.79 0.16

40.2 72.10.11

0.063.3 NA NA 5.9

48.000.03

% (0-5)Incidence Severity

%(0-5)Incid X Sev

5.3 1.00.00 0.02

32.4

0.7 0.09

Incidence Severity

0.00 0.00 0.000.127.80.11

0.00 0.000.80.01 0.00

11.4 1.350.2

Incidence SeverityWoodstock Kippen

% (0-5)(0-5)Incid X Sev Incidence

% (0-5)Severity Incid X Sev

(0-5) (0-5)

1.80

%

45.4 39.50.16

(0-5) (0-5)

St. ThomasIncidence Severity Incid X Sev

(0-5)

Elora

%Severity Incid X SevIncidence

7.8 0.1950.0 38.4 38.6

12.220.427.00.301.7

64.4 62.1 101.53.4 1.2 0.05

1.1 0.20.00

4.2 NA 0.12 6.80.080.00 0.01 0.00 0.00

0.120.00

4.9 1.190.00 0.01

17

Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean - Preliminary Yield Trials 2014

TrtNo Treatment Name

1 Red Rider 3.3 bc 1.00 0.03 bc2 Bellagio 0.5 c 0.25 0.01 c3 ADMC259 6.0 b 2.44 0.13 b4 Etna (Commercial Check) 2.8 bc 1.05 0.04 bc6 ACUG 12-C2 0.5 c 0.50 0.01 c7 SEMC0929 3.8 bc 1.27 0.08 bc8 SEMC1031 1.5 bc 0.85 0.03 bc9 SEMC1261 0.5 c 0.50 0.01 c12 Chianti 2.0 bc 1.75 0.04 bc16 Messina (Susceptible Check) 14.8 a 1.73 0.25 a

MeanCVPR>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)

Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean - Preliminary Yield Trials 2015

TrtNo Treatment Name

1 Bellagio 1.0 b 1.00 cd 0.04 b 0.0 b 0.00 b 0.00 b2 Etna (Commercial Check) 2.0 b 0.90 b 0.04 b 0.0 b 0.00 b 0.00 b3 ACUG 13-C1 3.8 b 2.50 abc 0.08 b 0.0 b 0.00 b 0.00 b4 ACUG 14-C2 0.5 b 0.30 d 0.01 b 0.0 b 0.00 b 0.00 b5 Chianti 4.5 b 1.40 bcd 0.06 b 0.0 b 0.00 b 0.00 b6 Messina (Susceptible Check) 23.5 a 2.70 abc 0.68 a 6.0 a 2.70 a 0.18 a

MeanCVPR>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)

Notes Marsh spot is a physiological disorder in large seeded (Andean type) beans, primarily cranberry beans. Symptoms include a discolouring of tissue (brown/black) in the centre of the seed and can be observed when the seed is split along the cotelydonary axis. Seed of all cranberry cultivars and breeding lines were assessed for marsh spot, and compared to the cultivar Messina (susceptible check)

Conclusions:In 2014, moderate levels of marsh spot were detected at WoodstockIn 2014, Messina had the highest levels of marsh spot (incidence x severity), but a significant level of marsh spot was detected in the cultivar ADMC259. In 2015, moderate levels of marsh spot were detected at Exeter, and low levels at WoodstockIn 2015, Messina had the highest levels of marsh spot (incidence x severity), and there were no differences between other cultivars

0.000.00 0.114.7 N/A 0.105

91.8 88.0 116.03.6 1.14 0.06

Woodstock

% (0-5) (0-5)Incidence Av Severity Incid X Sev

0.4 0.0

% (0-5) (0-5) %

116.0

0.77

Exeter WoodstockIncidence Av Severity Incid X Sev Incidence Av Severity Incid X Sev

(0-5) (0-5)

5.9 1.46 0.15 1.0

0.080.00 0.00

180.40.00 0.02 0.00 0.0074.8 66.5 108.8 179.5

6.6 1.46 0.247 2.7

18

2015 Anthracnose Foliar Fungicide Head to Head - Early Planting

Trt Treatment RateNo. Name Rate Unit grams1 Inoculated Control 3.8 a 12.3 a 2.2 a 9.2 a 2.0 a 11.0 a 15.5 a 3921 def 3653 def 23.9 a 7.3 a2 Uninoculated Control 0.1 h 0.4 f 0.0 i 0.0 h 0.0 d 0.1 f 0.1 d 3998 b-f 3981 b-e 24.9 a 0.5 g3 Quadris 500 ml/ha 0.9 fg 1.0 ef 0.2 f-i 0.6 gh 0.2 cd 0.6 f 0.9 d 4029 b-f 3915 b-f 24.7 a 2.9 def4 Allegro 600 ml/ha 1.1 efg 2.0 def 0.7 efg 1.6 fgh 0.4 bcd 1.6 ef 1.8 d 4089 a-f 4007 a-e 24.8 a 2.1 ef5 Allegro 1000 ml/ha 1.1 efg 2.0 def 0.4 f-i 1.4 fgh 0.4 bcd 1.9 ef 2.2 d 4161 a-e 4062 a-d 24.7 a 2.4 ef6 Allegro+Quadris 600+500 ml/ha 0.8 fgh 1.1 ef 0.4 f-i 0.4 gh 0.2 cd 0.4 f 1.1 d 4655 a 4574 a 25.3 a 1.7 fg7 Quadris Top + NIS 625+0.2% ml/ha 0.6 fgh 1.3 ef 0.3 f-i 0.9 gh 0.3 bcd 0.6 f 1.2 d 3795 def 3695 def 24.4 a 2.7 def8 Senator 1.75 kg/ha 1.2 efg 2.0 def 0.5 e-i 1.4 fgh 0.4 bcd 1.6 ef 1.2 d 4337 a-d 4227 a-d 25.2 a 2.6 def9 Senator 2.25 kg/ha 1.4 ef 3.6 cd 0.7 def 2.0 efg 0.5 bcd 2.2 def 1.5 d 4354 a-d 4219 a-d 25.4 a 3.1 def

10 Fluopyram 500 ml/ha 3.4 ab 8.6 b 1.5 b 5.5 bc 1.9 a 7.7 b 8.5 b 3702 ef 3479 ef 23.9 a 6.2 ab11 Luna Propulse 500 ml/ha 2.2 cd 4.7 c 1.2 bcd 3.8 cde 0.8 bc 4.7 c 6.6 bc 4022 b-f 3794 def 25.0 a 5.8 ab12 Luna Propulse 750 ml/ha 2.3 cd 4.0 cd 1.3 bc 3.1 def 0.8 bc 3.4 cde 3.4 cd 3915 def 3716 def 24.4 a 5.2 bc13 Vertisan 1250 ml/ha 2.7 bc 8.2 b 1.0 cde 6.3 b 0.9 b 8.2 b 5.6 bc 3556 f 3363 f 24.5 a 5.6 bc14 Acapela 880 ml/ha 0.5 gh 1.0 ef 0.1 hi 0.5 gh 0.1 d 0.4 f 0.9 d 4565 abc 4405 abc 25.6 a 3.6 de15 BAS 70302F+AgSurf 450+0.125% ml/ha 0.6 gh 1.0 ef 0.1 hi 0.5 gh 0.1 d 0.5 f 1.9 d 4583 ab 4467 ab 25.2 a 2.6 ef16 Headline 400 ml/ha 0.6 gh 1.1 ef 0.2 ghi 0.4 gh 0.1 d 0.4 f 1.1 d 3981 c-f 3868 c-f 25.2 a 2.9 def17 Quash (metconazole) 280 g/ha 1.8 de 4.8 c 1.3 bc 4.3 cd 0.8 bc 4.5 cd 6.0 bc 4209 a-e 4036 a-e 24.6 a 4.2 cd18 EAC 1407 3150 ml/ha 1.2 efg 2.6 cde 0.5 e-h 1.9 fgh 0.4 bcd 2.4 c-f 1.5 d 3955 def 3856 c-f 24.8 a 2.5 ef

** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Planting Date: May 15thRow Width: 15 inch (38 cm)Number of Rows Per Plot: 4Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4

Plot Length: 6mHarvest Length: 4m Inoculation Date: July 23rdSeeding Rate: 20 seeds/m Treatment Date: July 23rd, Aug 7th, Aug 13th and 27th (latter two dates controls only)Cultivar: T9905 Navy Fungicide: Aug 13th and 27th Headline (0.4/L/HA)

Dessication: September 11-Ignite (3L per ha), Eragon (71g per ha)Harvest Date: Sep 14th

Conclusions:* leaf, stem and pod disease severity in the infected control was below average* most treatments had low disease severity for leaf, stem and pod ratings* Fluopyram (Trt 10) and Vertisan (trt 13) had high disease severity for leaf, stem and pod ratings compared to the other fungicide treatments* Quash (trt 17) had moderate disease severity for leaf, stem and pod ratings compared to the other fungicide treatments* there were few differences between treatments for yield or yield-pick* Allegro+ Quadris (trt 6), Acapela (trt 14) and BAS70302F (trt 15) had higher yield than the infected control* all trts except Fluopyram, Luna Propulse and Quash had less pick than the infected control

100 Seed Wt.Pod Infection (%)

19 Stem Infection (%) Leaf Vein Infection (%)

Yield4734(kg ha)(kg ha)

Yield - Pick

LSD (P=.05) 0.755.6

0.8 2.2 585 583 NS

Insecticide: June 17-Matador (83ml/ha), June 25-Cygon (1L/ha), Matador (83ml/ha), July 9th-Cygon (1L/ha) Matador (83ml/ha), August 31-Cygon (0.5L/ha), Matador (83ml/ha)

Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.00490.0001 0.000137.4CV 83.6 31.6

1.6

Herbicide: May 14-Pursuit (170ml per ha) and Dual 2 Magnum (1.7L per ha) pre plant incorporated, June 17- Reflex (1L per ha), September 11-Ignite (3L per ha), Eragon (71g

0.0001

Pick(g)

(%)

2.560.4

0.000110.1 10.4

0.0001 0.11020.018445.8

0.00013.1

0.0001

34 19 34

0.552.1

1.9

Days After Application

3.471.1

19

19

2015 Anthracnose Foliar Fungicide Head to Head - Late Planting

Trt Treatment RateNo. Name Rate Unit1 Inoculated Control 3.0 a 5.6 a 2.1 a 4.7 a 1.9 a 4.0 ab2 Uninoculated Control 0.0 d 0.0 d 0.0 e 0.0 d 0.0 f 0.0 d3 Quadris 500 ml/ha 0.1 d 0.2 d 0.0 e 0.1 d 0.0 f 0.1 d4 Allegro 600 ml/ha 0.3 d 0.3 d 0.2 e 0.2 d 0.2 ef 0.2 d5 Allegro 1000 ml/ha 0.4 d 0.5 d 0.2 e 0.4 d 0.1 ef 0.4 d6 Allegro+Quadris 600+500 ml/ha 0.1 d 0.2 d 0.1 e 0.1 d 0.0 ef 0.0 d7 Quadris Top + NIS 625+0.2% ml/ha 0.2 d 0.1 d 0.1 e 0.1 d 0.1 ef 0.1 d8 Senator 1.75 kg/ha 0.3 d 0.4 d 0.3 e 0.3 d 0.3 ef 0.3 d9 Senator 2.25 kg/ha 0.3 d 0.4 d 0.2 e 0.3 d 0.2 ef 0.3 d10 Fluopyram 500 ml/ha 2.1 b 4.7 ab 1.6 ab 3.9 ab 1.6 ab 4.3 a11 Luna Propulse 500 ml/ha 1.3 bc 3.1 bc 1.0 cd 2.5 bc 1.0 cd 2.4 c12 Luna Propulse 750 ml/ha 0.8 cd 1.5 cd 0.5 de 1.1 cd 0.5 de 1.1 d13 Vertisan 1250 ml/ha 1.4 bc 4.1 ab 1.2 bc 3.4 ab 1.1 bc 3.0 bc14 Acapela 880 ml/ha 0.1 d 0.1 d 0.0 e 0.1 d 0.0 f 0.1 d15 BAS 70302F+AgSurf 450+0.125% ml/ha 0.2 d 0.1 d 0.2 e 0.1 d 0.2 ef 0.1 d16 Headline 400 ml/ha 0.2 d 0.1 d 0.1 e 0.1 d 0.1 ef 0.1 d17 Quash (metconazole) 280 g/ha 0.3 d 0.5 d 0.2 e 0.3 d 0.1 ef 0.3 d19 EAC 1407 3150 ml/ha 0.4 d 0.2 d 0.3 e 0.1 d 0.3 ef 0.0 d

** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)

Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD Planting Date: June 22nd Row Width: 15 inch (38 cm)Number of Rows Per Plot: 4Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 rowsPlot Length: 6m Inoculation Date: Aug 13thHarvest Length: 4m Treatment Date: Aug 13th and Aug 27th (latter date controls only)Seeding Rate: 20 seeds/m Fungicide: Aug 27th- Headline (0.4/L/HA) Cultivar: T9905 Harvest Date: NA

Conclusions:

Herbicide: May 14- Pursuit (170ml/ha) and Dual 2 Magnum (1.7L/ha) pre plant Insecticide: June 25 Cygon (1L/ha), Matador (83ml/ha), July 9th Cygon (1L/ha) Matador (83ml/ha)

Leaf Vein Infection (%)

1.5

August 31-Cygon (0.5L/ha), Matador (83ml/ha)

Days After Application27 3427 34 27 34

LSD (P=.05) 0.8 2.1 0.582.9 97.50.5 1.3

* the study was abandoned before harvest, due to low disease pressure

CV 88.7 118.5 85.0 113.20.0001Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001

Stem Infection (%) Pod Infection (%)

* leaf, stem and pod disease severity in the infected control was much below average* most treatments had low disease severity for leaf, stem and pod ratings* Fluopyram (Trt 10) and Vertisan (trt 13) had high disease severity for leaf, stem and pod ratings compared to the other fungicide treatments*low rate of Luna Propulse (trt 11) had moderate disease severity for leaf, stem and pod ratings compared to the other fungicide treatments

0.00010.0001 0.0001 0.0001

20

White Mold Registered Products Dry Bean 1st Planting - HRSUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code1 Untreated Check 9.1 a 13.5 a 42.4 a 0.7 a 0.8 a 1.0 a 4.0 a 13.8 a 41.3 a 31.1 a 7.9 a 3.1 a 3334 d 3074 e2 Lance 540 g ai/ha AB 1.0 d 4.3 c-g 14.3 e-h 0.2 cde 0.5 b-g 1.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 c 12.5 def 32.7 a 8.9 a 2.1 bc 3630 cd 3309 de3 Allegro 500F 300 g ai/ha AB 1.0 d 2.6 fg 12.0 gh 0.1 de 0.5 c-g 1.0 a 0.4 a 0.4 c 8.4 f 32.9 a 7.3 a 2.3 b 3880 abc 3599 a-d4 Allegro 500F 500 g ai/ha A 1.6 bcd 4.1 c-g 17.8 c-g 0.3 b-e 0.6 a-e 1.0 a 0.0 a 2.6 bc 12.5 def 32.4 a 8.3 a 2.3 b 3947 abc 3618 a-d5 Allegro 500F 500 g ai/ha AB 1.5 bcd 1.9 g 11.3 h 0.3 b-e 0.3 efg 1.0 a 0.9 a 0.8 c 12.5 def 32.5 a 8.6 a 1.8 c 4209 ab 3846 abc6 Propulse 200 g ai/ha AB 0.5 d 2.9 d-g 16.3 d-h 0.1 e 0.3 efg 1.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 c 16.3 c-f 33.8 a 7.5 a 2.1 bc 3900 abc 3605 a-d7 Propulse 300 g ai/ha A 1.0 d 3.9 c-g 15.3 d-h 0.2 de 0.4 d-g 1.0 a 0.0 a 1.5 bc 18.6 cde 33.7 a 6.4 a 2.3 b 4210 ab 3936 ab8 Propulse 300 g ai/ha AB 1.6 bcd 4.9 c-g 14.1 e-h 0.2 b-e 0.5 b-g 1.0 a 0.3 a 4.3 bc 8.8 ef 33.2 a 6.4 a 2.3 b 4191 ab 3926 ab9 Senator 1210 g ai/ha AB 3.5 bc 9.1 b 19.1 c-f 0.5 b 0.7 abc 1.0 a 2.5 a 8.8 ab 23.8 bc 32.4 a 9.7 a 2.0 bc 3881 abc 3513 b-e10 Senator 1575 g ai/ha AB 0.9 d 2.8 efg 12.1 gh 0.1 de 0.3 g 1.0 a 0.0 a 0.3 c 7.5 f 33.3 a 5.9 a 2.3 b 4290 a 4041 a11 Acapela 220 g ai/ha AB 3.6 bc 10.5 ab 23.9 bc 0.4 bc 0.8 ab 1.0 a 0.0 a 7.4 abc 12.5 def 33.2 a 8.2 a 2.1 bc 3635 cd 3340 de12 Priaxor+Lance 150+392 g ai/ha AB 2.8 bcd 6.9 bcd 20.9 cd 0.4 b-e 0.6 a-f 1.0 a 2.3 a 1.5 bc 21.8 cd 32.4 a 6.0 a 2.4 b 3631 cd 3416 cde13 Quash 140 g ai/ha AB 3.9 b 7.8 bc 28.5 b 0.5 b 0.7 abc 1.0 a 5.0 a 5.0 bc 33.8 ab 32.4 a 6.1 a 2.1 bc 3735 bcd 3504 b-e14 Fludioxonil 1210 g ai/ha AB 1.9 bcd 2.9 d-g 12.0 gh 0.2 b-e 0.3 fg 1.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 c 7.5 f 32.8 a 7.0 a 2.1 bc 3978 abc 3699 a-d15 Astound Granular 610 g ai/ha AB 3.6 bc 4.9 c-g 23.9 bc 0.5 b 0.5 a-g 1.0 a 1.9 a 1.5 bc 22.5 cd 31.9 a 6.8 a 2.1 bc 3648 cd 3402 cde16 Senator 1575 g ai/ha A 1.3 cd 6.5 b-f 16.0 d-h 0.2 de 0.6 a-d 1.0 a 0.5 a 1.6 bc 15.0 c-f 32.0 a 7.7 a 2.4 b 4127 abc 3806 a-d17 EAC 1407 1210 g ai/ha AB 2.9 bcd 6.8 b-e 19.8 cde 0.4 bcd 0.6 a-e 1.0 a 1.5 a 2.0 bc 9.6 ef 33.3 a 8.9 a 2.3 b 3893 abc 3561 a-e18 EAC 1407 1575 g ai/ha AB 3.5 bc 4.5 c-g 13.5 fgh 0.3 b-e 0.5 b-g 1.0 a 4.0 a 1.3 c 12.5 def 33.3 a 7.8 a 2.4 b 4061 abc 3739 a-d

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)

Irrigation: July 28th, August 16th, 23rd, 28th,September 1st, 7th, 14th.

Conclusions:

(kg/ha)

LSD (P=.05) 2.5

19 DAA 28 DAA 45 DAA

NA

(g) (%) (1-5, 1=best) (kg/ha)

4.0 6.2 0.3 0.3 NA NA 0.4 511.3 500.57.4 10.0 NA42.9CV 70.3 51.1 23.8 9.3 9.83.2 30.8 12.9

0.0247 0.0292

Severity (%) Incidence (0-1) Incidence x Severity (%) Weight Pick

0.0620 0.5217 0.00030.0013 0.0018 0.2919 0.1852 0.0284 0.0001

Quality Yield Yield - PickDisease Disease Disease Seed100 Seed

Treatments: 2nd application on August 23 at 7:00 AM, temperature=11 C, RH=90%, Wind=2 kph W, dew not present, soil slightly damp

19 DAA 28 DAA 45 DAA 19 DAA 28 DAA 45 DAA

Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.000164.2 34.3 2.7 216.9 178.9

Planted: June 20 2015 6 rows @ 38 cm and 6 meter length. Harvested: September 29 2015 4 rows @ 38 cm and 4 meter length. Design: RCBD with 4 replications. Inocculum: White mold innoculum applied foliarly Treatments: 1st application on August 7 at 8:00 AM, temperature=16 C, RH=90%, Wind=0 kph, dew present, soil slightly damp

* all treatments except Senator (low rate) and Acapela were better than the untreated check for disease severity at 28 DAA

* Allegro (low rate), Senator (high rate 2 appl.) and Fludioxonil had the lowest disease severity at 45 DAA* Propulse (high rate 1 appl), Senator (low rate), Priaxor+Lance and Astound Granular had relatively high disease severity at 45 DAA

* all treatments except Lance, Acapela, Priaxor+Lance and Quash had higher yield than the untreated check

Herbicide : Pursuit @ 170 ml/ha (May 14) Dual 2 Magnum @ 1.7 L/ha (May 14)

*no phytotoxicity was measured from fungicide application* disease severity in the untreated check was moderate, compared to past work.

* Senator (high rate 2 appl) had the highest yield of all treatments* Allegro, Propulse, Fludioxonil and EAC 1407 had yields that were similar to to the highest yielding treatment (Senator)

* all treatments except Quash were better than the untreated check for disease severity at 45 DAA

* no treatment differences for seed weight and pick. All treatments were better than the untreated check for visual seed quality.

21

White Mold Registered Products Dry Bean 2nd Planting - HRSUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code

1 Untreated Check 19.0 a 37.1 a 49.1 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 20.8 a 43.8 a 58.8 a 32.4 e 6.4 a 3.4 a 1942 f 1822 h2 Lance 540 g ai/ha AB 6.0 efg 20.3 def 20.9 fgh 0.7 bc 1.0 a 1.0 a 3.6 cde 20.0 c 20.0 def 34.8 d 5.3 a 2.0 cd 3013 ab 2849 abc3 Allegro 500F 300 g ai/ha AB 5.5 efg 17.3 efg 19.5 gh 0.7 c 1.0 a 1.0 a 2.9 de 16.3 cd 16.3 ef 35.3 bcd 4.9 a 2.0 cd 2932 abc 2788 a-d4 Allegro 500F 500 g ai/ha A 7.4 b-f 16.6 fg 20.8 fgh 0.9 ab 1.0 a 1.0 a 7.8 b-e 16.3 cd 27.5 b-f 35.3 bcd 4.7 a 2.1 bcd 3209 a 3061 a5 Allegro 500F 500 g ai/ha AB 2.6 g 11.3 g 18.4 h 0.5 d 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.6 e 6.3 d 21.3 c-f 37.3 a 4.8 a 1.9 d 3298 a 3137 a6 Propulse 200 g ai/ha AB 10.9 bcd 25.1 cde 27.4 c-g 0.9 ab 1.0 a 1.0 a 10.1 bcd 22.5 c 26.3 b-f 36.7 abc 5.3 a 2.3 bcd 2678 b-e 2537 b-f7 Propulse 300 g ai/ha A 9.1 b-f 25.9 bcd 29.4 cde 0.9 abc 1.0 a 1.0 a 12.1 b 26.3 bc 26.3 b-f 34.4 d 6.2 a 2.5 b 2367 def 2222 e-h8 Propulse 300 g ai/ha AB 5.0 fg 17.8 d-g 27.3 c-g 0.7 bc 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.9 e 17.5 cd 17.5 def 36.9 ab 5.9 a 2.4 bc 3199 a 3010 ab9 Senator 1210 g ai/ha AB 9.0 b-f 21.9 c-f 25.5 d-h 0.8 abc 1.0 a 1.0 a 7.9 b-e 20.0 c 21.3 c-f 36.3 a-d 5.7 a 2.1 bcd 2846 a-d 2682 a-e10 Senator 1575 g ai/ha AB 6.5 d-g 17.5 efg 21.4 fgh 0.7 bc 1.0 a 1.0 a 6.6 b-e 13.8 cd 27.5 b-f 36.3 a-d 4.4 a 2.0 cd 2996 ab 2865 abc11 Acapela 220 g ai/ha AB 9.0 b-f 23.3 c-f 34.1 bc 0.9 ab 1.0 a 1.0 a 8.4 b-e 23.8 c 35.0 bc 36.2 a-d 5.2 a 2.3 bcd 2498 cde 2371 d-g12 Priaxor+Lance 150+392 g ai/ha AB 11.0 bc 23.4 c-f 25.9 d-h 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 8.5 b-e 21.3 c 21.3 c-f 34.6 d 5.1 a 2.1 bcd 2693 b-e 2556 b-f13 Quash 140 g ai/ha AB 11.6 b 33.8 ab 37.8 b 0.9 abc 1.0 a 1.0 a 8.0 b-e 38.8 ab 37.5 b 34.5 d 4.6 a 2.3 bcd 1995 f 1905 gh14 Fludioxonil 1210 g ai/ha AB 6.1 efg 18.9 d-g 23.8 e-h 0.7 bc 1.0 a 1.0 a 4.5 b-e 16.3 cd 13.8 f 35.7 a-d 5.5 a 2.0 cd 2999 ab 2835 a-d15 Astound Granular 610 g ai/ha AB 9.9 b-e 28.6 bc 32.0 bcd 0.8 abc 1.0 a 1.0 a 8.4 b-e 23.8 c 31.3 bcd 34.8 cd 5.8 a 2.0 cd 2328 ef 2188 fgh16 Senator 1575 g ai/ha A 6.8 c-g 22.4 c-f 25.5 d-h 0.8 abc 1.0 a 1.0 a 7.3 b-e 20.0 c 23.8 b-f 35.9 a-d 5.2 a 2.3 bcd 2894 abc 2744 a-d17 EAC 1407 1210 g ai/ha AB 11.0 bc 25.3 cde 28.0 c-f 0.9 ab 1.0 a 1.0 a 10.8 bc 25.0 c 30.0 b-e 34.9 cd 5.4 a 2.3 bcd 2615 b-e 2473 c-f18 EAC 1407 1575 g ai/ha AB 6.1 efg 22.3 c-f 27.6 c-f 0.8 bc 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.1 e 18.8 cd 21.3 c-f 36.2 a-d 5.5 a 2.0 cd 2844 a-d 2696 a-e



Conclusions:

* Fludioxonil had the lowest disease incidence x severity at 42 DAA, but a number of treatments had similar scores

* there were no differences in seed pick. Differences between fungicide products for seed quality were minimal.

NA 7.8 12.9 14.3

* disease severity in the untreated check was moderate, compared to past work.

18.0 1.2 0.0 75.3 42.1 38.3CV 36.7 25.8 20.6

Treatments: 1st application on August 17 at 7:00 AM, temperature=20 C, RH=95%, Wind=2 kph E, dew present, soil dampTreatments: 2nd application on August 31 at 11:00 AM, temperature=23 C, RH=80%, Wind=4 kph W, dew not present, soil slightly dampHerbicide : Pursuit @ 170 ml/ha (May 14) Dual 2 Magnum @ 1.7 L/ha (May 14)

*no phytotoxicity was measured from fungicide application

0.0006 0.00010.4753 1.0000 0.0020 0.0003 0.0001

Planted: June 26 2015 6 rows @ 38 cm and 6 meter length. Harvested: September 29 2015 4 rows @ 38 cm and 4 meter length. Design: RCBD with 4 replications. Inocculum: White mold innoculum applied foliarly

Disease Disease Disease 100 Seed SeedYield

0.0017 0.5264 0.000112.7

0.0001

1.9 NA 0.412.93.9 20.7 12.1

Yield - Pick(kg/ha)

Weight Pick(1-5, 1=best)

Quality(kg/ha)(g) (%)

492.6 474.3

Severity (%) Incidence (0-1) Incidence x Severity (%)16 DAA 23 DAA 42 DAA 16 DAA 23 DAA 42 DAA 42 DAA16 DAA 23 DAA

0.2 NA

* all treatments except Propulse (high rate, 1 appl), Quash and Astound Granular had higher yield than the untreated check* Allegro (high rate 1 appl), Allegro (high rate 2 appl) and Propulse (high rate, 2 appl) had the highest yield of all treatments* Propulse (low rate, 2 appl), Acapela, Priaxor+Lance and EAC 1407 (low rate) had weaker yields that the top yielding treatments

* Allegro (high rate, 2 appl) had highest seed weight, but a number of treatments had similar scores

* all treatments were better than the untreated check for disease incidence x severity at 16, 23 and 42 DAA, except Quash at 23 DAA * Allegro (high rate, 2 appl) had the lowest disease incidence x severity at 23 DAA, but a number of treatments had similar scores

LSD (P=.05) 4.4 8.3 8.0

Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

22

White Mold Registered Products Soybean 2015 Late PlantingUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code1 UNTREATED A 0.0 a 0.0 a 5.3 a 5.4 a 14.5 a 0.6 a 0.6 a 1.0 a 15.8 a 1.5 a 3732 a 55.5 a2 ACAPELA 0.88 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 4.3 a 3.0 b 6.6 bc 0.5 a 0.5 ab 0.7 a-d 16.4 a 1.0 c 4026 a 59.9 a3 ACAPELA 0.88 l/ha AB 0.0 a 0.0 a 3.0 a 0.8 c 4.1 bc 0.5 a 0.1 d 0.5 cd 16.3 a 1.0 c 4037 a 60.0 a4 Allegro 0.44 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 5.6 a 2.9 b 9.9 ab 0.6 a 0.4 abc 0.7 a-d 16.4 a 1.1 bc 3705 a 55.1 a5 STRATEGO PRO+AGRAL 90 0.5714+0.125% l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 4.9 a 3.1 b 9.5 ab 0.6 a 0.5 ab 0.8 abc 16.2 a 1.0 c 4053 a 60.3 a6 STRATEGO PRO+AGRAL 90 0.5714+0.125% l/ha AB 0.0 a 0.0 a 3.4 a 1.4 bc 3.4 c 0.4 a 0.2 bcd 0.5 d 16.6 a 1.0 c 3958 a 58.9 a7 EAC 1407 2.42 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 4.3 a 1.8 bc 6.8 bc 0.6 a 0.3 bcd 0.6 bcd 16.2 a 1.3 b 3959 a 58.9 a8 EAC 1407 3.15 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 3.1 a 1.4 bc 6.3 bc 0.4 a 0.2 cd 0.6 bcd 16.5 a 1.1 bc 3855 a 57.3 a9 Priaxor 0.45 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 3.3 a 2.4 bc 8.0 bc 0.4 a 0.4 abc 0.8 ab 16.5 a 1.0 c 4055 a 60.3 a


Irrigation: July 28th, August 7th, 16th, 23rd, 28th,September 1st, 7th.

Conclusions:

Phytotoxicity Disease Severity (%) Disease Incidence (0-1) Weight

CV 0.0 0.0 48.8

49 DAA

LSD (P=.05) 0.0 0.0 NS

49 DAAQuality Yield

0.4694 0.0011 0.16222.6 13.9 5.4NS 0.2 NS

(g) (1-5, 1=best) (kg/ha)

0.1621

* disease severity in the untreated check was moderate, compared to past work. * two applications of Acapela did not have a consistent impact on disease severity, compared to one application

* Trts 4 and 5 (Allegro A, Stratego Pro A) were similar to the untreated control for disease severity at 49 DAA

0.0052 0.0260 0.3116 0.0198 0.0263Treatment Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000 0.4899

Harvested: October 23 2015 4 rows @ 38 cm and 4 meter length.

*no phytotoxicity was measured from fungicide application

Design: RCBD with 4 replications.

* there were no treatment differences for seed weight or yield.

* two applications of Stratego Pro had an impact on disease severity at 49 DAA, compared to one application * two applications of Stratego Pro had the lowest disease severity, but was similar to Acapela (Trt 2 and 3), EAC 1407 (Trt 7 and 8) and Priaxor (Trt 9)

Planted: June 20 2015 6 rows @ 38 cm and 6 meter length.

* there were minor treatment differences for seed quality.

Inocculum: White mold innoculum applied foliarly Treatments: 1st application on August 17 at 11:00 AM, temperature=27 C, RH=70%, Wind=8 kph SE, dew present, soil slightly dampTreatments: 2nd application on August 21 at 4:00 PM, temperature=25 C, RH=70%, Wind=5 kph W, no dew present, soil slightly dampHerbicide : Pursuit @ 170 ml/ha (May 14) Dual 2 Magnum @ 1.7 L/ha (May 14)

5.457.9 52.7 35.5 50.5 28.7NS2.1 5.9 NS 0.3 0.3

100 Seed Seed

7 DAA1 7 DAA2 18 DAA 30 DAAYield

(bu/ac)18 DAA 30 DAA

23

White Mold Registered Products Soybean 2015 Early PlantingUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code1 UNTREATED A 0.0 a 0.0 a 4.4 abc 8.9 a 7.0 a 0.5 a 0.7 a 0.8 a 15.6 a 1.0 a 4203 a 62.5 a2 ACAPELA 0.88 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 4.6 ab 7.0 ab 5.8 a 0.6 a 0.7 a 0.7 a 16.2 a 1.0 a 4513 a 67.1 a3 ACAPELA 0.88 l/ha AB 0.0 a 0.0 a 1.1 d 3.3 bc 4.1 a 0.2 a 0.4 a 0.5 a 16.4 a 1.0 a 4489 a 66.7 a4 Allegro 0.44 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 2.0 cd 5.4 abc 4.8 a 0.3 a 0.6 a 0.5 a 16.1 a 1.0 a 4490 a 66.8 a5 STRATEGO PRO+AGRAL 90 0.5714+0.125% l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 2.3 bcd 3.4 bc 4.1 a 0.3 a 0.4 a 0.4 a 15.6 a 1.0 a 4480 a 66.6 a6 STRATEGO PRO+AGRAL 90 0.5714+0.125% l/ha AB 0.0 a 0.0 a 2.5 bcd 2.5 c 3.9 a 0.4 a 0.3 a 0.5 a 15.7 a 1.0 a 4581 a 68.1 a7 EAC 1407 2.42 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 5.0 a 8.1 a 7.3 a 0.6 a 0.7 a 0.7 a 16.0 a 1.0 a 4241 a 63.1 a8 EAC 1407 3.15 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 3.3 a-d 7.0 ab 5.3 a 0.4 a 0.7 a 0.6 a 15.7 a 1.0 a 4201 a 62.5 a9 Priaxor 0.45 l/ha A 0.0 a 0.0 a 5.6 a 8.3 a 8.0 a 0.6 a 0.8 a 0.8 a 16.4 a 1.0 a 4329 a 64.4 a



Conclusions:

Yield Yield

* disease severity in the untreated check was relatively low, compared to past work. * two applications of Acapela had some impact on disease severity, compared to one application

Phytotoxicity Disease Severity (%) Disease Incidence (0-1) Weight Quality

0.2129 1.0000 0.1157 0.11570.0113 0.5874

* there were no treatment differences for seed weight or seed quality or yield.

* no phytotoxicity was measured from fungicide application

* two applications of Stratego Pro did not impact on disease severity, compared to one application

Design: RCBD with 4 replications. Inocculum: White mold innoculum applied foliarly Treatments: 1st application on August 4 at 8:30 AM, temperature=21 C, RH=76%, Wind=3 kph S, dew present, soil dampTreatments: 2nd application on August 18 at 8:00 AM, temperature=22 C, RH=93%, Wind=2 kph E, dew present, soil dampHerbicide : Pursuit @ 170 ml/ha (May 14) Dual 2 Magnum @ 1.7 L/ha (May 14)

* Trts 3, 4, 5 and 6 (Acapela AB, Allegro A, Stratego Pro A and Stratego Pro AB) had the best reduction in disease severity at 23 days after planting* Trts 3, 5 and 6 (Acapela AB, Stratego Pro A and Stratego Pro AB) had the best reduction in disease severity at 31 days after planting

Harvested: October 12 2015 4 rows @ 38 cm and 4 meter length. Planted: June 6 2015 6 rows @ 38 cm and 6 meter length.

3.5 0.0 5.0CV 0.0 0.0 49.30.0632 0.0609 0.4238Treatment Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000 0.0095

5.044.8 60.3 44.2 39.4 44.4NS NS3.9 NS NS NS NS

23 DAA 31 DAA 58 DAA

NS 0.0LSD (P=.05) 0.0 0.0 2.5

58 DAA

100 Seed Seed

7 DAA1 7 DAA2 23 DAA 31 DAA (kg/ha)(g) (1-5, 1=best) (bu/ac)

24

Fusarium Root Rot Seed Treatment Head-to-Head Dry Bean 1st Planting (5 g/m of row)University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name (ml/100 kg) Code

1 Uninnoculated Check + Cruiser 50 A 4.4 a 45.0 a 48.8 a 52.9 ab 59.0 abc 67.7 cd 70.2 bc 67.9 c 5.7 a 5.7 a 5.7 ab 6.5 a 7.5 a 6.7 a 7.3 ab 1.0 a 1.3 a 26.4 a 2.1 a 2574 a2 Innoculated Check + Cruiser 50 A 0.0 c 26.5 ef 30.6 e 37.1 e 45.2 e 55.8 e 62.7 d 61.3 d 4.8 c 5.0 bc 5.2 bcd 6.0 a 7.0 bc 6.2 a 6.7 c 1.3 a 0.8 a 27.1 a 2.2 a 2579 a3 Cruiser Maxx Bean 56.25 A 0.4 bc 30.6 def 39.6 bcd 45.8 bcd 54.0 bcd 68.1 cd 76.9 a 75.0 b 4.8 c 5.0 bc 5.3 a-d 6.3 a 7.0 bc 6.3 a 7.0 abc 0.8 a 1.0 a 25.8 a 2.0 a 2333 a4 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Dynasty 56.25+1 A 0.0 c 25.8 f 32.1 de 40.6 de 49.8 de 60.2 de 66.7 cd 66.3 cd 4.2 d 4.7 c 4.8 d 5.5 a 7.0 bc 6.5 a 6.5 c 0.0 a 0.2 a 28.0 a 2.1 a 2415 a5 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Sedaxane 56.25+2.5 A 0.0 c 31.3 c-f 37.5 cde 44.8 cd 56.3 bcd 70.6 abc 78.3 a 76.7 ab 4.8 c 5.0 bc 5.0 cd 6.0 a 6.8 c 6.7 a 7.5 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 25.6 a 2.1 a 2545 a6 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Sedaxane 56..25+5.0 A 0.2 c 26.7 ef 35.8 cde 42.3 de 51.5 cde 68.5 bc 77.9 a 75.6 b 4.5 cd 5.0 bc 5.5 abc 6.3 a 7.0 bc 6.7 a 6.8 bc 0.0 a 0.2 a 25.3 a 2.2 a 2687 a7 Rancona Summit + Cruiser 4.06+50 A 0.4 bc 34.2 b-e 41.0 abc 46.5 bcd 55.4 bcd 68.1 cd 76.7 ab 74.4 b 4.7 cd 5.2 b 5.3 a-d 6.2 a 7.2 abc 6.3 a 6.8 bc 1.3 a 1.0 a 26.5 a 2.3 a 2600 a8 Rancona Summit + Cruiser + Sedaxa 4.06+50+2.5 A 1.3 bc 37.1 a-d 45.6 ab 50.2 abc 59.6 ab 71.5 abc 79.0 a 76.9 ab 5.0 bc 5.0 bc 5.5 abc 6.3 a 7.3 ab 6.7 a 7.3 ab 0.4 a 0.6 a 26.2 a 1.9 a 2668 a9 Rancona Summit + Cruiser + Sedaxa 4.06+50+5.0 A 2.1 b 39.0 abc 47.5 a 55.2 a 66.3 a 78.3 a 83.1 a 81.9 a 5.5 ab 5.7 a 5.8 a 6.5 a 7.3 ab 6.7 a 7.0 abc 1.3 a 0.6 a 26.9 a 2.2 a 2928 a

10 Evergol Energy + Cruiser A 2.1 b 42.1 ab 47.9 a 55.2 a 64.8 a 76.3 ab 82.9 a 81.9 a 5.0 bc 5.3 ab 5.3 a-d 6.0 a 7.5 a 6.7 a 7.0 abc 0.6 a 0.8 a 26.0 a 2.0 a 2719 a

Conclusions:

Wt (g)DAPQuality Yield

* differences between the two control trts for emergence were dramatic for the first 15 days after planting, which suggests that the inocculum gave a significant level of disease pressure* differences between the two control trts for vigour were evident for the first 13 days after planting

* the addition of Dynasty (trt 4) to Cruiser Maxx Bean (trt 3) resulted in a reduction in emergence and vigour * the addition of Sedaxane (trt 5 and 6) to Cruiser Maxx Bean (trt 3) did not provide an increase in emergence or vigour

* no treatment differences in dead plants, seed weight, seed quality or seed yield were measured

* Rancona Summit + Sedaxane (trt 9) and Evergol Energy (trt 10) had the highest emergence and were equal or better than the uninoculated control for the first 34 days after planting.

* the addition of Sedaxane (trt 8 and 9) to Rancona Summit (trt 7) resulted in an increase in emergence and vigour particularly at higher rates (trt 9)

15 1513 13149 12

9.210.616.6 7.713.3CV 137.3 20.10.000 0.0010.000

271218 1814

0.6

0.015 0.114

6.6 0.40.5 NA7.0

days after planting days after planting

LSD (P=.05) 1.7 8.0

0.000

(kg/ha)

NANA NA6.0 0.6 NA

273434 34

15.15.2 154.3

27

136.27.5 5.18.40.001Treatment Prob(F)

SeedVigour

0.000 0.0005.6 11.410.112.1

0.000

NA NA8.18.0

(1-5, 1=best)

7.9 0.57.3

100 Seed

7.3

Herbicide : Pursuit @ 170 ml/ha (May 14) Dual 2 Magnum @ 1.7 L/ha (May 14) Reflex @ 1 L/ha (June 19)Insecticide: Matador @ 83 ml/ha (June 19, Aug 6) Cygon @ 1 L/ha + Matador @ 83 ml/ha (June 25, July 9) Fungicide: Lance @ 770 g/ha (Aug 6)

Dead Plants

Planted: May 21 2015 2 rows @ 76 cm and 2 meter length. Harvested: September 17 2015 2 rows @ 76 cm and 2 meter length. Design: RCBD with 4 replications. Inocculum: Fusarium solani applied in the seed furrow at planting, at a rate of 5 grams per meter of row

% Emergence 1-10 (1=worse) (#/plot)

0.112 0.205 0.4210.088 0.4360.000 0.033 0.7180.000 0.021

25

Fusarium Root Rot Seed Treatment Head-to-Head Dry Bean 2nd Planting (10 g/m of row)University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo Name (ml/100 kg) Code

1 Uninnoculated Check + Cruiser 50 A 3.1 a 47.3 a 50.8 a 53.5 a 58.1 ab 63.5 bc 51.6 de 63.5 ef 5.8 a 5.8 a 6.2 a 6.3 a 6.8 a 6.7 a 7.3 a 2.3 ab 0.8 a 26.7 a 1.8 a 3829 a2 Innoculated Check + Cruiser 50 A 1.0 a 18.5 f 25.4 d 33.1 e 41.7 e 51.9 d 47.3 e 57.7 f 4.2 d 4.7 c 5.0 b 5.8 a 6.2 a 6.3 a 7.2 a 1.0 bc 1.3 a 26.6 a 1.5 bc 2948 a3 Cruiser Maxx Bean 56.25 A 1.5 a 31.0 cde 36.3 bc 42.9 cd 48.8 cde 64.2 bc 59.5 bc 72.5 bcd 4.8 bc 5.2 b 5.5 b 6.5 a 6.7 a 6.7 a 7.2 a 0.6 c 0.4 a 25.8 a 1.6 abc 2865 a4 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Dynasty 56.25+1 A 0.2 a 23.3 ef 28.8 cd 35.8 de 44.8 de 57.5 cd 51.3 de 61.9 f 4.5 cd 4.7 c 5.0 b 6.0 a 6.5 a 6.3 a 7.2 a 1.5 bc 1.0 a 26.7 a 1.6 abc 3093 a5 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Sedaxane 56.25+2.5 A 0.9 a 25.6 def 30.2 cd 35.6 de 46.3 de 65.2 ab 57.5 bc 70.2 cd 4.5 cd 4.8 bc 5.3 b 6.0 a 6.5 a 6.5 a 7.2 a 1.5 bc 1.3 a 26.7 a 1.6 abc 2977 a6 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Sedaxane 56..25+5.0 A 0.4 a 26.0 def 30.0 cd 35.8 de 47.3 cde 63.3 bc 55.8 cd 69.0 de 4.5 cd 4.8 bc 5.3 b 6.2 a 6.5 a 6.8 a 7.3 a 2.3 ab 1.5 a 26.8 a 1.6 abc 3593 a7 Rancona Summit + Cruiser 4.06+50 A 2.7 a 29.6 cde 36.7 bc 43.5 bcd 52.9 bcd 70.2 ab 62.0 ab 75.4 abc 5.2 b 5.2 b 5.5 b 6.2 a 6.5 a 6.8 a 7.3 a 2.9 a 2.1 a 25.9 a 1.8 ab 3043 a8 Rancona Summit + Cruiser + Sedaxane4.06+50+2.5 A 1.5 a 33.8 bcd 39.2 b 46.7 abc 54.8 abc 68.1 ab 60.1 abc 72.5 bcd 5.0 bc 5.0 bc 5.3 b 6.0 a 6.5 a 6.3 a 7.5 a 1.7 abc 1.5 a 26.9 a 1.6 abc 3373 a9 Rancona Summit + Cruiser + Sedaxane4.06+50+5.0 A 1.9 a 40.6 ab 49.2 a 54.0 a 61.5 a 69.8 ab 62.1 ab 76.7 ab 5.2 b 5.2 b 5.5 b 6.2 a 7.0 a 6.7 a 7.3 a 1.7 abc 0.6 a 26.3 a 1.3 c 3509 a

10 Evergol Energy + Cruiser A 0.8 a 35.8 bc 43.1 ab 51.3 ab 57.9 ab 71.7 a 65.5 a 79.8 a 5.0 bc 5.0 bc 5.5 b 6.0 a 6.8 a 6.8 a 7.5 a 1.0 bc 1.3 a 25.8 a 1.4 c 3592 a

Conclusions:

days after planting days after planting DAP Wt (g) (1-5, 1=best) (kg/ha)

Herbicide : Pursuit @ 170 ml/ha (May 14) Dual 2 Magnum @ 1.7 L/ha (May 14) Reflex @ 1 L/ha (June 19)Insecticide: Matador @ 83 ml/ha (June 19, Aug 6) Cygon @ 1 L/ha + Matador @ 83 ml/ha (June 25, July 9)

* differences between the two control trts for emergence were dramatic for the first 20 days after planting, which suggests that the inocculum gave a significant level of disease pressure* differences between the two control trts for vigour were evident for the first 14 days after planting

* the addition of Dynasty (trt 4) to Cruiser Maxx Bean (trt 3) resulted in a reduction in emergence and vigour * the addition of Sedaxane (trt 5 and 6) to Cruiser Maxx Bean (trt 3) did not provide an increase in emergence or vigour* the addition of a hgih rate of Sedaxane (trt 9) to Rancona Summit (trt 7) resulted in an increase in emergence

* no treatment differences in seed weight or seed yield were measured* Rancona Summit + Sedaxane (trts 9) and Evergol Energy (trt 10) had the highest seed quality

* Rancona Summit + Sedaxane (trt 9) and Evergol Energy (trt 10) had the highest emergence and were equal or better than the uninoculated control for the first 34 days after planting.

* minor differences were measured in the dead plants at 27 days after planting, but the differences were not consistent over treatments

Fungicide: Lance @ 770 g/ha (Aug 6)

0.048 0.082

Planted: May 21 2015 2 rows @ 76 cm and 2 meter length. Harvested: September 17 2015 2 rows @ 76 cm and 2 meter length. Design: RCBD with 4 replications. Inocculum: Fusarium solani applied in the seed furrow at planting, at a rate of 10 grams per meter of row

0.333 0.872 0.044 0.410 0.1190.000 0.044 0.100 0.1520.0007.2

0.000 0.000 0.000Treatment Prob(F) 0.129 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.3 NACV 127.9 23.1 20.3 16.0 13.7 9.5

NA NA 1.3 NA NA6.3 70.0 96.5 3.1 15.4 18.43

NA NA7.1 5.5 6.4 0.68.3 7.9 10.5 7.8 10.1 5.8 7.1

34 100 Seed Quality Yield

LSD (P=.05) NA 8.4 8.8 8.1 8.2

18 27 34 2734 12 13 14 15

0.5 0.6

9 12 13 14 15 18 27

Vigour Dead Plants Seed% Emergence 1-10 (1=worse) (#/plot) Seed

26

Rhizoctonia Root Rot Seed Treatment Head-to-Head Dry Bean 1st Planting (5 g/m of row)University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus


1 Uninnoculated Check + Cruiser 50 A 2.1 a 35.6 a 39.2 ab 48.5 abc 55.8 bc 62.7 bcd 62.9 cde 63.1 cde 5.7 a 5.7 a 6.2 a 6.5 a 7.3 a 6.3 a 7.3 a 0.8 a 0.8 a 26.9 ab 1.7 ab 3253 a2 Innoculated Check + Cruiser 50 A 0.0 a 5.2 e 7.7 g 13.1 g 24.8 f 40.2 f 44.8 f 42.7 f 3.3 e 4.0 d 5.0 c 5.5 c 6.3 d 5.8 a 6.5 a 1.0 a 0.8 a 28.0 a 1.7 ab 2129 d3 Cruiser Maxx Bean 56.25 A 0.0 a 18.1 cd 27.5 def 39.6 de 47.7 de 61.0 cd 64.8 bcd 65.2 bcd 4.3 cd 4.8 bc 5.5 bc 5.8 bc 6.8 bc 6.0 a 6.7 a 1.0 a 0.2 a 27.1 ab 1.5 abc 2942 abc4 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Dynasty 56.25+1 A 0.0 a 17.1 d 26.0 ef 36.5 ef 48.3 de 60.2 de 61.3 de 60.4 de 4.0 de 4.7 c 5.2 c 5.8 bc 6.8 bc 6.0 a 6.5 a 1.0 a 0.4 a 28.0 a 1.5 abc 2764 abc5 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Sedaxane 56.25+2.5 A 0.6 a 21.5 bcd 29.2 cde 38.8 de 52.9 cd 67.7 ab 68.8 abc 68.8 abc 4.8 bc 5.0 bc 5.3 bc 6.2 ab 6.8 bc 5.7 a 6.7 a 0.4 a 0.8 a 26.8 b 1.7 ab 2737 abc6 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Sedaxane 56..25+5.0 A 0.0 a 23.8 bc 33.8 bcd 43.5 cde 57.7 abc 66.7 abc 65.4 bcd 65.8 bcd 4.5 bcd 4.8 bc 5.3 bc 5.7 bc 6.7 cd 5.8 a 6.8 a 2.3 a 0.8 a 27.0 ab 1.5 abc 2711 bc7 Rancona Summit + Cruiser 4.06+50 A 0.0 a 15.8 d 22.5 f 31.0 f 42.7 e 54.4 e 56.5 e 57.7 e 4.3 cd 4.7 c 5.3 bc 5.5 c 6.8 bc 5.7 a 6.5 a 1.7 a 0.4 a 27.3 ab 1.4 bc 2464 cd8 Rancona Summit + Cruiser + Sedaxane 4.06+50+2.5 A 0.6 a 26.3 b 34.0 bc 44.8 bcd 56.3 abc 68.5 ab 71.0 ab 70.8 ab 4.5 bcd 4.8 bc 5.5 bc 5.7 bc 6.8 bc 5.8 a 7.0 a 0.8 a 0.6 a 26.3 b 1.5 abc 3173 ab9 Rancona Summit + Cruiser + Sedaxane 4.06+50+5.0 A 0.0 a 35.8 a 42.1 a 53.3 a 62.3 ab 72.1 a 74.0 a 73.5 a 5.0 abc 5.3 ab 5.8 ab 6.0 abc 7.2 ab 6.2 a 7.2 a 0.8 a 0.8 a 26.6 b 1.3 c 3125 ab

10 Evergol Energy + Cruiser A 0.6 a 36.7 a 42.1 a 51.7 ab 62.9 a 71.0 a 73.1 a 73.5 a 5.2 ab 5.2 abc 5.8 ab 6.2 ab 7.0 abc 6.0 a 6.8 a 1.5 a 1.0 a 26.3 b 1.8 a 2704 bc

Conclusions:


* differences between the two control trts for emergence were dramatic for 34 days after planting, which suggests that the inocculum gave a high level of disease pressure

* Rancona Summit + Sedaxane (trt 9) and Evergol Energy (trt 10) had the highest emergence and were better than the uninoculated control for the first 34 days after planting.

* there was no increase in root rot control from a high rate of Sedaxane (trt 9) versus a low rate of Sedaxane (trt 8) in combination with Rancona Summit

Herbicide : Pursuit @ 170 ml/ha (May 14) Dual 2 Magnum @ 1.7 L/ha (May 14) Reflex @ 1 L/ha (June 19)Insecticide: Matador @ 83 ml/ha (June 19, Aug 6) Cygon @ 1 L/ha + Matador @ 83 ml/ha (June 25, July 9) Fungicide: Lance @ 770 g/ha (Aug 6)

0.032 0.002

Planted: May 21 2015 2 rows @ 76 cm and 2 meter length. Harvested: September 17 2015 2 rows @ 76 cm and 2 meter length. Design: RCBD with 4 replications. Inocculum: Rhizoctonia solani applied in the seed furrow at planting, at a rate of 5 grams per meter of row

0.526 0.051 0.172 0.858 0.0320.001 0.005 0.028 0.0080.000Treatment Prob(F) 0.082 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00014.3 11.0 8.8 8.88.9CV 299.8 20.7

NA6.8

0.000 0.000 0.000

5243.6 15.6 16.09.1 7.3 92.2 129.818.1 15.7 11.5

0.5 NA NA NA6.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.66.9 6.15.6

9 12 13 14 15 18 27 34 27 34 100 Seed Quality Yield18 27 3412


LSD (P=.05) 1.4 5.7 6.4 7.3

13 14 15

1.1 0.38.3 9.0

* differences between the two control trts for vigour were evident for the first 20 days after planting

* the addition of Dynasty (trt 4) to Cruiser Maxx Bean (trt 3) did not improve emergence and vigour * the addition of Sedaxane (trt 5 and 6) to Cruiser Maxx Bean (trt 3) did not improve emergence or vigour* the addition of a Sedaxane (trts 8 and 9) to Rancona Summit (trt 7) resulted in an dramatic increase in emergence

* no treatment differences in dead plants were measured

* all seed treatments except Rancona Summit + Cruiser (trt 7) had significantly higher yield than the inoculated control * minor differences were measured in the seed weight and seed quality, but the differences were not consistent over treatments

27

Rhizoctonia Root Rot Seed Treatment Head-to-Head Dry Bean 2nd Planting (10 g/m of row)University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus


1 Uninnoculated Check + Cruiser 50 A 1.5 a 30.6 a 35.8 ab 46.5 ab 55.0 bc 62.7 cd 51.5 de 61.3 de 4.7 a 5.0 a 6.0 a 6.3 a 7.0 a 6.2 a 7.0 abc 1.7 a 0.0 a 26.0 a 1.7 a 2397 ab2 Innoculated Check + Cruiser 50 A 0.0 b 2.5 e 3.3 g 6.5 e 16.5 f 27.1 f 27.5 f 28.1 g 2.1 c 2.8 c 4.0 d 5.3 c 5.8 d 5.7 a 6.2 d 1.0 a 0.8 a 27.5 a 1.9 a 1216 c3 Cruiser Maxx Bean 56.25 A 0.2 b 16.3 cd 22.1 def 33.5 cd 47.3 cde 59.6 cde 50.5 de 60.0 def 3.2 b 4.3 ab 5.0 c 5.8 abc 6.7 abc 6.0 a 6.7 bcd 0.6 a 0.8 a 27.3 a 1.8 a 2310 ab4 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Dynasty 56.25+1 A 0.0 b 14.0 cd 19.6 ef 30.6 d 45.0 de 55.4 de 46.6 e 54.2 ef 3.7 b 4.2 b 5.2 bc 5.5 bc 6.2 cd 6.0 a 6.5 cd 0.4 a 0.8 a 26.6 a 1.7 a 2246 ab5 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Sedaxane 56.25+2.5 A 0.0 b 21.7 bc 29.0 bcd 43.3 ab 55.0 bc 65.0 abc 55.0 bcd 66.7 bcd 3.8 ab 4.5 ab 5.3 bc 6.0 ab 6.5 abc 5.7 a 6.5 cd 0.8 a 1.3 a 26.3 a 1.6 a 2437 ab6 Cruiser Maxx Bean + Sedaxane 56..25+5.0 A 0.0 b 17.9 cd 26.5 cde 39.8 bc 52.9 cd 63.8 bcd 54.6 cd 65.6 cd 3.7 b 4.3 ab 5.3 bc 6.0 ab 6.2 cd 6.2 a 6.7 bcd 1.3 a 0.6 a 26.8 a 1.8 a 2359 ab7 Rancona Summit + Cruiser 4.06+50 A 0.0 b 12.7 d 16.5 f 25.0 d 39.0 e 52.5 e 45.0 e 51.3 f 4.0 ab 4.5 ab 5.3 bc 5.7 bc 6.3 bcd 5.8 a 6.3 d 0.8 a 0.4 a 27.2 a 1.7 a 2160 b8 Rancona Summit + Cruiser + Sedaxane4.06+50+2.5 A 0.2 b 32.3 a 37.7 a 50.0 a 64.4 a 73.1 a 62.0 a 75.6 a 3.7 b 4.7 ab 5.7 ab 6.3 a 6.8 ab 6.2 a 7.2 ab 1.7 a 0.8 a 26.0 a 1.5 a 2706 ab9 Rancona Summit + Cruiser + Sedaxane4.06+50+5.0 A 0.0 b 30.8 a 33.8 abc 48.3 ab 62.9 ab 71.9 ab 60.1 abc 73.8 abc 4.7 a 4.8 ab 5.7 ab 5.8 abc 6.5 abc 6.3 a 7.3 a 0.4 a 0.2 a 27.0 a 1.5 a 2884 a

10 Evergol Energy + Cruiser A 0.2 b 27.5 ab 35.0 ab 49.8 a 64.0 a 73.1 a 61.5 ab 75.0 ab 4.7 a 5.0 a 5.7 ab 6.0 ab 6.7 abc 6.2 a 7.2 ab 0.6 a 0.2 a 26.6 a 1.6 a 2693 ab

Conclusions:

* there was no increase in root rot control from a high rate of Sedaxane (trts 6 and 9) versus a low rate of Sedaxane (trts 5 and 8)

* differences between the two control trts for emergence were dramatic for 34 days after planting, which suggests that the inocculum gave a high level of disease pressure


Herbicide : Pursuit @ 170 ml/ha (May 14) Dual 2 Magnum @ 1.7 L/ha (May 14) Reflex @ 1 L/ha (June 19)Insecticide: Matador @ 83 ml/ha (June 19, Aug 6) Cygon @ 1 L/ha + Matador @ 83 ml/ha (June 25, July 9)

* Rancona Summit + Sedaxane (trts 8 and 9) and Evergol Energy (trt 10) had the highest emergence and were better than the uninoculated control for the first 34 days after planting.

0.000 0.0410.000 0.000

Fungicide: Lance @ 770 g/ha (Aug 6)

Planted: May 21 2015 2 rows @ 76 cm and 2 meter length. Harvested: September 17 2015 2 rows @ 76 cm and 2 meter length. Design: RCBD with 4 replications. Inocculum: Rhizoctonia solani applied in the seed furrow at planting, at a rate of 10 grams per meter of row

3.8 17.8 23.46.9 151.67.6 140.90.002 0.0010.000 0.4060.171 0.673 0.175 0.372

640NA0.5 NA0.521.3

Treatment Prob(F) 0.003 0.000 0.0007.19.8 9.1288.4 32.8 26.8 14.012.3

0.000

0.50.60.7 0.68.9 NA NA8.4CV

8.1 8.70.7 7.9 1.08.86.7

0.000 0.00011.112.620.0 14.3

0.0000.000

9 12 13 14 15 18 27 34 34 100 Seed Quality Yield18 27 34 27


12 13 14 15

LSD (P=.05)

* differences between the two control trts for vigour were evident for the first 24 days after planting

* the addition of Dynasty (trt 4) to Cruiser Maxx Bean (trt 3) did not improve emergence and vigour * the addition of Sedaxane (trt 5 and 6) to Cruiser Maxx Bean (trt 3) gave an inconsistent increase in emergence or vigour* the addition of a Sedaxane (trts 8 and 9) to Rancona Summit (trt 7) resulted in an dramatic increase in emergence

* no treatment differences in seed weight or seed quality were measured

28

2015 Planting Date Large Seed Huron Research StationUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

TargetTrt Planting PopulationNo. Date Cultivar (plants/ha)

1 2014‐05‐26 120346 a 90.9 a 24.7 d 27.7 b 78.9 a 40.8 a 77.4 a 1.0 c 52.5 c 1692 c 15.1 c2 2014‐06‐05 128177 a 97.5 a 54.8 c 31.8 a 77.6 a 35.2 a 50.9 b 1.5 a 54.3 b 2211 b 19.7 b 3 2014‐06‐20 125990 a 95.7 a 74.0 b 30.2 a 76.1 a 19.8 b 39.5 b 1.4 a 61.5 a 2668 a 23.8 a4 2014‐06‐22 127396 a 96.5 a 78.3 a 31.7 a 75.6 a 20.9 b 42.1 b 1.2 b 62.0 a 2706 a 24.1 a

1 Narrow 200,000 195184 a 97.7 a 58.8 a 29.4 a 77.3 a 21.5 c 44.3 b 1.3 a 56.6 c 2458 a 21.9 a2 Narrow 160,000 151504 c 94.7 a 58.4 a 30.3 a 77.7 a 26.4 bc 38.6 c 1.2 a 57.0 bc 2469 a 22.0 a3 Narrow 120,000 116712 e 97.2 a 61.2 a 30.9 a 78.0 a 28.7 b 63.4 a 1.3 a 59.9 a 2596 a 23.2 a4 Narrow 80,000 72292 g 90.4 a 57.6 a 28.9 a 72.4 a 40.7 a 46.5 b 1.3 a 58.3 b 2199 b 19.6 b 5 Wide 175,000 163542 b 93.5 a 57.9 a 31.2 a 77.7 a 21.9 c 56.4 b 1.2 a 55.3 d 2331 ab 20.8 ab6 Wide 140,000 139063 d 99.3 a 55.2 a 30.6 a 78.0 a 23.5 c 66.0 a 1.3 a 56.2 c 2214 b 19.8 b 7 Wide 105,000 100938 f 96.1 a 58.6 a 30.5 a 77.5 a 32.9 ab 51.0 b 1.4 a 58.5 ab 2231 b 19.9 b 8 Wide 70,000 64583 g 92.3 a 55.9 a 31.1 a 77.9 a 37.6 a 53.6 b 1.3 a 58.9 a 2058 b 18.4 b

Factior A Prob(F)Factior B Prob(F)Factior AB Prob(F)Factor A LSD (P=.05)Factor B LSD (P=.05)Factor AB LSD (P=.05)

Notes:1st Planting May 26, harvested September 15 (105 DAE)2nd Planting June 5, harvested September 24 (104 DAE)3rd Planting June 20, harvested October 2 (99 DAE)4th Planting June 22, harvested October 9 (97 DAE)All plots were hand harvested and thrashed with with Hege 140 plot combineDesign: RCBD with 4 replications.

Conclusions:* plant populations were >90% of desired population for all treatments* plant height was lowest for May 26 planting date * Greenseeker (canopy cover) increased with later planting dates, likely due to the timing of the rating and leaf drop in early planted plots.* plant dry weight decreased at later planting dates, and increased as the plant population decreased* few meaningful differences in BBCH (plant development) was measured* PPFD (light penetration) decreased at later planting dates*100 seed weight increased at later planting dates *Yield increased at later planing dates, likely due to excessive rainfall from June 6‐18 * Yield decreased between 60% and 40% plant populations but only in narrow rows.

2.7NS

(bu/ac)

0.00010.01550.93371.9

Plant Population Greenseeker Height BBCH Dry Weight PPFD Seed 100Plant Plant

(kg/ha)(#/ha) (% of desired) (0‐1) (g)

Factor A

Factor B

QualityJuly 10 July 10 Aug 26 Aug 28 Aug 28 (%) (g)

(cm) Seed Wt Yield

0.0001 0.0001 0.00010.4339 0.0001 0.0155

0.0001 0.0001 0.2425 0.0001 0.00010.2388 0.5328 0.3665 0.0001 0.0283

0.5661 0.1935 0.93370.6412 0.6334 0.43753.2 1.7 NS

0.0348 0.17285.6 12.1 0.1 1.1 216

NS 1.5 30615.8 NS NS

NS NS NSNS NS NS NS NS

7.9 17.1

0.05300.20690.9107NSNSNS

0.05310.00010.9766NS8601NS

29

Planting Date Large Seed (Red Hawk DRK) RidgetownUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

TargetTrt Planting Population (cm)No. Date Cultivar (plants/ha)

1 2014‐05‐26 121562 a 96 c 0.33 c 44.0 a 59.7 a 50 a 99 a 55.6 a 2834 b 42.1 b2 2014‐06‐05 153542 a 121 a 0.53 b 44.9 a 64.3 a 26 b 96 a 56.8 a 3509 a 52.2 a3 2014‐06‐16 147500 a 117 a 0.65 a 46.5 a 46.6 b 19 b 30 b 54.6 a 2915 b 43.3 b4 2014‐06‐26 131354 a 106 b 0.67 a 41.7 b 30.5 c 18 b 1 c 46.8 b 2526 b 37.6 b

1 Narrow 200,000 178750 a 90 c 0.53 a 44.3 a 40.0 c 30 a 58 a 54.1 a 3103 a 46.1 a2 Narrow 160,000 156875 a 99 b 0.55 a 43.0 a 42.5 c 31 a 56 a 54.0 a 3186 a 47.4 a3 Narrow 120,000 127083 a 107 b 0.49 a 43.5 a 50.8 b 29 a 56 a 52.7 a 2829 a 42.1 a4 Narrow 80,000 116667 a 148 a 0.56 a 44.8 a 60.0 ab 33 a 57 a 53.5 a 2851 a 42.4 a5 Wide 175,000 183958 a 106 b 0.57 a 44.9 a 36.9 c 25 a 56 a 54.0 a 3053 a 45.4 a6 Wide 140,000 155208 a 112 b 0.56 a 44.8 a 45.8 bc 24 a 57 a 53.6 a 3074 a 45.7 a7 Wide 105,000 116667 a 112 b 0.56 a 44.8 a 53.8 b 30 a 57 a 52.6 a 2860 a 42.5 a8 Wide 70,000 72708 a 105 b 0.53 a 43.9 a 72.4 a 25 a 54 a 53.0 a 2611 a 38.8 a


Notes:1st Planting May 26, harvested September 4 (101 DAE)2nd Planting June 5, harvested September 10 (98 DAE)3rd Planting June 16, harvested September 24 (100 DAE)4th Planting June 26, harvested October 1 (98 DAE)All plots were hand harvested and thrashed with with Hege 140 plot combineDesign: RCBD with 4 replications.

Conclusions:* plant populations were higher than desired for June 5 and June 16 planting dates* plant height was lowest for June 26 planting date * Greenseeker (canopy cover) increased with later planting dates, likely due to the timing of the rating and leaf drop in early planted plots. * plant dry weight decreased dramatically at later planting dates, and increased as the plant population decreased* PPFD (light penetration) decreased at later planting dates*100 seed weight decreased at the June 26 planting date *Yield was highest for the June 5 later planting date, and similar for the other planting dates. * Yield was not affected by plant population or row width.

Plant Population Greenseeker Height Dry Weight PPFD Pod 100Plant Plant

YieldJuly 10 July 10 Aug 26 Aug 28 Aug 28 (%) (g) (kg/ha) (bu/ac)(#/ha) (% of desired) (0‐1) (g)

Factor A

Factor B

Maturity Seed Wt

0.0001 0.0057 0.00570.6180 0.1851 0.1851

0.0001 0.0286 0.0001 0.0001 0.00010.3107 0.7466 0.0001 0.6161 0.7584

0.2501 0.2360 0.23600.2582 0.7492 0.84430.09 2.9 6.2

0.6562 0.832610 5 2.2 454 6.8

NS NS NSNS NS NS

NS NS 13.7NS NS NS NS NS23797

0.00330.02330.2312119NS

0.00360.00010.0032NANA NS NS

30

Planting Date Small Seed RidgetownRidgetown Campus, University of Guelph


1 2014‐05‐26 178125 b 89 a 0.86 a 54.4 c 44.9 a 8.4 a 43 a 20.6 bc 3839 a 57.1 a2 2014‐06‐05 190104 a 94 a 0.87 a 58.0 b 37.0 b 3.8 bc 20 b 22.8 a 3518 a 52.3 a3 2014‐06‐16 188646 ab 94 a 0.87 a 62.5 a 27.0 c 2.9 c 8 c 21.4 b 3627 a 53.9 a4 2014‐06‐26 197292 a 96 a 0.87 a 57.7 b 14.7 d 5.8 b 0 d 20.1 c 3659 a 54.4 a

1 Rexeter 300,000 275000 a 92 a 0.88 a 55.7 c 24.1 c 4.3 a 18 a 20.5 bc 3934 a 58.5 a2 Rexeter 240,000 232500 b 97 a 0.88 a 55.4 c 27.5 c 3.8 a 21 a 20.3 c 3868 a 57.5 a3 Rexeter 180,000 168333 d 94 a 0.87 a 55.6 c 29.5 bc 5.6 a 22 a 20.6 b 3849 a 57.2 a4 Rexeter 120,000 91200 f 76 c 0.87 a 54.3 c 31.6 b 4.7 a 19 a 20.7 b 3850 a 57.2 a5 Zorro 300,000 227917 b 76 c 0.86 a 63.5 a 27.3 c 3.5 a 14 a 22.9 a 3693 a 54.9 a6 Zorro 240,000 190625 c 79 c 0.86 a 60.8 a 25.3 c 6.1 a 16 a 21.6 b 3536 ab 52.6 ab7 Zorro 180,000 135208 e 75 c 0.87 a 60.6 a 37.3 ab 5.9 a 16 a 21.6 b 3420 b 50.9 b8 Zorro 120,000 97708 f 81 b 0.85 a 59.5 b 44.7 a 7.9 a 17 a 21.7 ab 3134 b 46.6 b


Notes:1st Planting May 26, harvested September 4 (101 DAE)2nd Planting June 5, harvested September 10 (98 DAE)3rd Planting June 16, harvested September 24 (100 DAE)4th Planting June 26, harvested October 1 (98 DAE)All plots were hand harvested and thrashed with with Hege 140 plot combineDesign: RCBD with 4 replications.

Conclusions:* plant populations were similar for all planting dates but were lower for Zorro, despite adjustments to seeding rate for germination* plant height was lowest for May 26 planting date * Greenseeker (canopy cover) was not affected by planting date or plant poputions. * plant dry weight decreased dramatically at later planting dates, and increased as the plant population decreased* PPFD (light penetration) decreased at later planting dates*100 seed weight decreased at later planting dates *Yield was similar across planting dates.* Yield decreased between 80% and 60% plant populations for the cultivar Zorro only.

Seed Wt YieldPlant Population

MaturityGreenseeker

(#/ha) (% of desired) (0‐1) (g)(cm)100Height Dry Weight PPFD Pod

Plant Plant

(kg/ha) (bu/ac)Aug 28 Aug 28 (%) (g)Aug 26July 10 July 10

12511 NS

0.02930.00010.2959

0.19800.00010.7423

0.36880.38040.4601

0.9 NS NSNS 2.1 5.5 2.8 5.01.3 417.4 6.2NS 3.0 NS NS7.8

NS NS NS NSNS 6.0 NS NS

Factor A

Factor B

NS NS17694 9

0.00010.00010.0072

0.00010.00010.8451

0.00130.43020.3487

0.00010.29370.9100

0.19330.00240.1793

0.00010.00310.0881

0.19330.00240.1793

31

2015 Planting Date Small Seed Huron Research StationUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus


1 2014‐05‐26 174837 a 83.6 a 75.3 30.3 b 74.6 a 27.7 a 32.0 a 1.5 a 24.5 a 2876 d 25.7 d2 2014‐06‐05 174479 a 83.5 a 79.6 32.9 a 75.0 a 22.6 b 25.4 a 1.5 a 22.7 c 3052 c 27.2 c3 2014‐06‐20 172813 a 82.4 a 81.8 29.1 c 64.3 b 13.2 c 13.7 b 1.3 c 23.4 b 3532 a 31.5 a4 2014‐06‐22 175365 a 83.4 a 79.3 27.9 d 63.1 c 14.6 c 17.0 b 1.4 b 23.6 b 3293 b 29.4 b

1 Rexeter 300,000 280521 a 93.5 a 81.1 a 30.7 a 69.7 a 12.4 c 12.9 a 1.5 b 23.0 c 3470 a 31.0 a2 Rexeter 240,000 216667 b 90.3 a 81.2 a 30.5 a 69.5 a 18.1 b 31.6 a 1.4 c 23.0 c 3515 a 31.4 a3 Rexeter 180,000 172591 c 95.9 a 79.9 a 29.0 b 69.3 a 19.5 ab 29.7 a 1.4 c 23.1 c 3322 a 29.6 a4 Rexeter 120,000 112188 d 93.5 a 79.6 a 29.0 b 69.0 a 22.2 a 16.9 a 1.5 b 23.5 b 3017 c 26.9 c5 Zorro 300,000 215938 b 72.0 b 79.0 a 30.1 a 69.5 a 17.9 b 14.8 a 1.4 c 23.2 c 3289 ab 29.3 ab6 Zorro 240,000 178438 c 74.3 b 78.9 a 31.1 a 69.4 a 20.1 a 18.4 a 1.3 d 23.7 b 3189 b 28.4 b7 Zorro 180,000 129375 d 71.9 b 78.1 a 29.4 b 68.4 a 21.3 a 22.7 a 1.4 c 24.3 a 3052 bc 27.2 bc8 Zorro 120,000 89271 e 74.4 b 74.2 b 30.7 a 69.5 a 24.7 a 29.3 a 1.6 a 24.3 a 2652 d 23.7 d


Notes:1st Planting May 26, harvested September 15 (105 DAE)2nd Planting June 5, harvested September 24 (104 DAE)3rd Planting June 20, harvested October 2 (99 DAE)4th Planting June 22, harvested October 9 (97 DAE)All plots were hand harvested and thrashed with with Hege 140 plot combineDesign: RCBD with 4 replications.

Conclusions:* plant populations were lower for Zorro, dispite being adjusted for seed germination* plant height was best for June 5 planting date, and worst for June 22 planting date* plant height decreased in Rexeter with lower plant populations, but this was not consistently observed with Zorro* plant dry weight decreased at later planting dates, and increased as the plant population decreased* few meaningful differences in Greenseeker (canopy cover) was measured* PPFD (light penetration) decreased at later planting dates*100 seed weight was lowest for June 5, and highest for May 26 planting date. *Yield was highest for June 20 planting date, followed by June 22, June 5 and May 26, likely due to excessive rainfall from June 6‐18 * Yield decreased between 60% and 40% plant populations for both cultivars.

0.0001

Seed Wt

0.3

NS 1.0

0.3107

YieldPlant Population

QualityGreenseeker

(#/ha) (% of desired) (0‐1) (g)(cm)BBCH 100Height Dry Weight PPFD Seed

Plant Plant

(kg/ha) (bu/ac)Aug 28 Aug 28 (%) (g)Aug 26July 10 July 10

0.5 249 2.21.4 NS NS 0.15.5NS NS 2.4

3.3

0.00290.8760

0.03230.30960.3526

0.00010.0127

176 1.63.9 13.3 0.1

Factor A

Factor B

NS NS21056 8.6

0.00010.60450.7585

1.0 0.9

0.99000.00010.4217

0.98000.00010.4322

0.00010.01320.5039

0.00230.337

NS

0.00010.00010.0435

0.00010.00010.0335

0.00010.00010.0435

499 4.5NS NS NS NS

0.0001

32

Cultivar x Row Width x Population Large Seed Huron Research StationUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

TargetTrt PopulationNo. Cultivar (%)

1 Hime 127292 a 98.4 a 31.3 a 23.1 b 19.0 a 48.7 69.0 a 47.5 b 63.8 c 82.0 b 21.9 c 35.4 d 3132 a 46.6 a2 Inferno 102813 b 78.0 b 31.4 a 24.8 a 21.7 a 54.3 68.4 a 57.5 a 64.4 b 82.3 b 26.8 b 64.9 a 2917 b 43.4 b3 Red Hawk 130990 a 99.0 a 30.8 a 23.7 b 18.4 a 35.8 60.9 b 39.2 c 64.7 a 85.2 a 34.1 a 53.6 c 2338 d 34.8 d4 Etna 129115 a 98.3 a 28.8 a 22.9 b 18.1 a 37.7 61.1 b 30.2 d 64.6 a 85.1 a 33.1 a 59.6 b 2650 c 39.4 c

1 Wide (76 cm) 132734 a 94.8 a 29.3 b 23.0 b 20.1 a 44.4 a 73.2 a 44.3 a 64.3 a 83.6 a 26.1 b 52.8 b 2846 a 42.3 a2 Narrow (38 cm) 112370 b 92.1 a 31.8 a 24.2 a 18.5 a 43.9 a 56.5 b 42.8 a 64.4 a 83.8 a 31.9 a 53.9 a 2672 b 39.8 b

1 100% 173958 a 92.6 a 30.3 a 23.9 a 16.0 c 33.8 c 67.0 a 43.5 a 64.3 a 83.9 a 24.4 c 53.1 a 2945 a 43.8 a2 80% 141563 b 94.3 a 32.8 a 23.9 a 18.6 b 41.7 b 68.8 a 41.3 a 64.5 a 83.7 a 25.8 bc 53.2 a 2995 a 44.6 a3 60% 103542 c 91.9 a 29.8 a 23.7 a 19.2 b 46.7 a 64.8 a 45.0 a 64.4 a 83.6 a 29.7 b 53.4 a 2681 b 39.9 b4 40% 71146 d 94.9 a 29.4 a 23.0 a 23.4 a 54.3 a 58.9 b 44.5 a 64.3 a 83.4 a 36.0 a 53.8 a 2417 c 36.0 c

Factor A Prob(F)Factor B Prob(F)Factor C Prob(F)Factor AB Prob(F)Factor AC Prob(F)Factor BC Prob(F)Factor ABC Prob(F)Factor A LSD (P=.05)Factor B LSD (P=.05)Factor C LSD (P=.05)Factor AB LSD (P=.05)Factor AC LSD (P=.05)Factor BC LSD (P=.05)Factor ABC LSD (P=.05)


Notes:Planting Date: June 6, 2015Harvest Dates: Etna ‐ September 7 (94 DAP), Hime, Inferno, Red Hawk ‐ September 15 (102 DAP)All plots were hand harvested and thrashed with with Hege 140 plot combineDesign: RCBD with 4 replications.

Conclusions:

* Yield decreased between 80% and 60% plant populations, and between 60% and 40% plant populations.

* plant populations were lower for Inferno, dispite being adjusted for seed germination* plant height increased in narrow row width* plant dry weight increased as the plant population decreased for both rating dates* few meaningful differences in BBCH (plant development) were measured* Greenseeker scores decreased in narrow rows and in lower plant populations on July 27 * higher PPFD scores (more light penetration) were found with narrow rows and lower plant populations on July 27, which agrees with Greenseeker scores. *100 seed weight increased slightly in narrow rows, but was not influenced by plant population*Yield decreased slightly in narrow rows

0.09770.8NSNSNS

3.5

0.0001

0.04850.4803 0.4803

0.0485

0.0001

0.30670.3516

0.7851

1.5

0.6926 0.69260.81510.6287

NS

5.4NSNS

5.00.2

0.20010.76570.34230.1751

NSNSNSNSNS

0.8214

NS10280726914538 NS

NS7.7NS

0.0001

0.00430.0012

36355140

0.0259 0.11993.8

NSNS

NS181128 1.9

2.7NS

NSNSNS NS

NS361

1.1NSNS

NS

NS3.2NSNSNSNS

0.7NSNSNSNS

NS 1.0 NS 7.9 4.2 3.8

NSNS

2.3 NSNSNS

3.04.2

Factor A (Cultivar)

Factor B (Row Width)

Factor C (Population)

0.1588

0.32110.23160.6656

0.0137

0.3870

0.0001 0.0001 0.3398

0.5083 0.5083

0.20620.8986 0.3734

0.8487

0.6659

NS

181 2.7

0.93380.6671

NSNS

0.67620.3471

0.97190.1779 0.6866

0.7462

NSNS

0.3383

NS

0.2843 0.9825 0.7170 0.8491

0.2286 0.0002 0.00010.0001 0.2301

0.5857 0.7012

0.64240.39570.21130.7056

100

(g) (kg/ha) (bu/ac)Seed Wt Yield

Plant PlantPlant Population Plant Height Dry Weight Greenseeker

BBCHPlant Development PPFD

0.0403 0.0083 0.0083

Aug 25 July 27 Aug 25 July 27 Aug 25 July 27

0.8715 0.00010.0001 0.0001 0.0001

0.27400.0007 0.0001

0.52830.00010.49320.0009 0.1388

0.1086 0.0001

NSNSNSNS

0.9944 0.2189

(#/ha) (% of desired) (cm) (g)

0.4642 0.8810 0.4856 0.1829

July 15 July 15 July 27

0.0001 0.0518 0.03730.0001

5140

7.9

(0‐1)

0.0891 0.9299

0.0016

(0‐100)July 27 Aug 25

NSNSNSNS5.0

NSNSNSNS NS

NSNSNS

0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

33

Cultivar x Row Width x Population Large Seed RidgetownUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

TargetTrt PopulationNo. Cultivar (%)

1 Hime 132363 a 101 a 27.5 a 36.2 b 3.6 a 25.7 a 0.40 a 0.66 a 66 a 37 b 70 d 27.4 c 2010 a 29.9 a2 Inferno 112292 b 85 b 27.2 a 40.6 a 3.5 a 22.7 a 0.37 a 0.62 a 69 a 43 b 82 c 48.5 a 1981 a 29.5 a3 Red Hawk 131667 a 100 a 27.4 a 36.8 b 3.3 a 16.8 b 0.38 a 0.55 b 72 a 60 a 91 b 41.1 b 1064 b 15.8 b4 Etna 133750 a 102 a 28.3 a 35.6 b 3.5 a 17.4 b 0.38 a 0.52 b 72 a 56 a 98 a 25.0 d 1175 b 17.5 b

1 Wide (76 cm) 139880 a 100 a 26.5 b 36.2 b 3.4 a 21.0 a 0.38 a 0.58 a 68 b 46 a 86 a 35.7 a 1487 a 22.1 a2 Narrow (38 cm) 115156 b 94 b 28.7 a 38.4 a 3.6 a 20.3 a 0.38 a 0.60 a 72 a 52 a 85 a 35.4 a 1628 a 24.2 a

1 100% 181979 a 97 a 29.0 a 38.3 a 3.0 a 17.3 a 0.41 a 0.64 a 66 a 46 a 85 a 35.0 a 1788 a 26.6 a2 80% 145938 b 97 a 27.9 a 37.4 a 3.2 a 18.9 a 0.38 b 0.60 a 70 a 49 a 85 a 36.4 a 1715 a 25.5 a3 60% 109447 c 97 a 27.4 ab 38.2 a 3.9 a 22.3 a 0.40 ab 0.60 a 68 a 48 a 86 a 35.2 a 1476 ab 21.9 ab4 40% 72708 d 97 a 26.0 b 35.3 a 3.7 a 24.2 a 0.33 c 0.52 b 76 a 51 a 84 a 35.4 a 1252 b 18.6 b

Factor A Prob(F)Factor B Prob(F)Factor C Prob(F)Factor AB Prob(F)Factor AC Prob(F)Factor BC Prob(F)Factor ABC Prob(F)Factor A LSD (P=.05)Factor B LSD (P=.05)Factor C LSD (P=.05)Factor AB LSD (P=.05)Factor AC LSD (P=.05)Factor BC LSD (P=.05)Factor ABC LSD (P=.05)

Notes:Planting Date: June 5, 2014Harvest Dates: Etna and Red Hawk on September 17, Hime and Inferno on October 1

Conclusions:* plant populations were lower for Inferno, dispite being adjusted for seed germination* plant height increased in narrow row width* plant dry weight was not affected by plant population or row width* few meaningful differences in BBCH (plant development) were measured* Greenseeker scores decreased at 40% plant populations for both rating dates * higher PPFD scores (more light penetration) were found with narrow rows on July 13. *pod maturity and 100 seed weight were not affected by row width or plant population*Yield was not affected by row width but decreased between 60% and 40% plant populations.

NS NS NS NSNS NS NS

0.1100 0.9352 0.6851 0.9185 0.5025 0.3039

NS 11.0

0.7216 0.5794 0.5824 0.0460 0.1055

0.6392

(#/ha) (% of desired) (cm) (g) (0‐1) Maturity Seed Wt Yield

0.0169 0.49470.9354 0.0046 0.3584 0.0001 0.1592

0.4082 0.6335 0.3124 0.3124

0.3871 0.4144 0.7164 0.9772

Pod 100Plant Plant

Plant Population Plant Height Dry Weight Greenseeker PPFD

0.0001 0.0001 0.6698 0.0008

(g) (kg/ha) (bu/ac)July 7 July 7 July 16 Aug 11 July 16 Aug 11 July 13 Aug 6 July 13 Aug 6 (%)

0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

0.0653

3.0 1.7

0.6611 0.6611

0.5553 0.4064 0.7398 0.7390 0.0827 0.2684 0.7878 0.5024 0.3702 0.7453 0.7022 0.7853 0.9536 0.9536

0.72230.3722

0.70190.0477 0.9126

NS

387.6 5.8

Factor A (Cultivar)

Factor B (Row Width)

Factor C (Population)

0.0177

0.41160.6801 0.9828

0.8129

0.0688 0.1227

8950 7.0 NS 2.5 NS

0.0001 0.0323 0.0009

5.6 NS 0.06

1.8NSNSNS

1.3

0.0116

0.38380.9621

NS0.06NSNSNS

NS0.03

NSNSNSNSNS

1.8

0.37680.5464

0.80000.0001

0.31480.6883 0.8222

0.8645

0.0015 0.0307

0.63240.8457 0.8457

0.6324

0.03070.2936

0.34610.0984 0.5804

0.2675

0.3954

NSNSNSNS

4.0 NSNSNSNS

NSNSNSNS

NSNSNSNSNS

NSNSNS NS

NSNSNS NS

NSNS

4.0NSNS NS

NSNS

NSNSNS NS

NSNS

NS387.6NS NS

5.8NS

NS5

0.06940.4419

0.9961

NSNS

12657NS NS

NSNSNS

0.0001

0.48090.0006

63298950

34

15DBVRP1 Variety x Population Small Seed Huron Research StationUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

Target TargetTrt Population PopulationNo. Cultivar (%) (plants/ha)

1 T9905 199271 a 94.4 a 39.6 a 29.2 a 13.2 a 31.9 a 63.0 a 83.9 a 64.8 b 51.9 c 35.0 ab 23.0 a 2960 a 44.0 a2 Nautica 195521 a 91.7 a 41.2 a 30.1 a 13.7 a 34.7 a 61.5 a 83.0 a 67.1 ab 60.0 b 28.9 b 19.7 c 2768 a 41.2 a3 Rexeter 191667 a 91.5 a 41.5 a 29.6 a 12.8 a 34.7 a 63.1 a 80.6 b 72.3 a 67.7 a 28.6 b 22.3 b 2885 a 42.9 a4 Zorro 161042 b 75.8 b 39.2 a 30.7 a 13.8 a 38.8 a 63.2 a 82.6 a 61.3 b 56.7 bc 41.4 a 22.5 b 2583 a 38.4 a

1 100 300,000 270208 a 90.1 a 42.2 a 28.9 b 10.6 b 26.3 c 63.7 a 83.3 a 72.2 a 53.3 c 27.7 c 21.0 d 3156 a 46.9 a2 80 240,000 220104 b 91.7 a 42.2 a 30.1 a 12.2 b 30.0 bc 62.5 a 83.0 a 72.8 a 56.6 bc 26.4 c 21.6 c 2842 a 42.3 a3 60 180,000 153958 c 85.5 b 41.1 a 30.5 a 15.7 a 34.8 b 62.3 a 82.1 a 67.1 a 59.6 b 31.8 c 22.1 b 2816 a 41.9 a4 40 120,000 103229 d 86.0 b 35.8 b 30.1 a 14.9 a 49.0 a 62.4 a 81.7 a 53.5 b 66.8 a 47.9 a 22.8 a 2383 b 35.4 b



Notes:Planting Date: June 6, 2015Harvest Dates: September 17 (104 DAP)All plots were direct harvested with Hege 140 plot combineDesign: RCBD with 4 replications.

Conclusions:* plant populations were lower for Zorro, dispite being adjusted for seed germination* slight differences in plant height were measured on each rating date* plant dry weight increased as the plant population decreased* few differences in BBCH (plant development) were measured* differences in Greenseeker scores on August 25 were likely due to differences in plant maturity * higher PPFD scores (more light penetration) were found with Zorro due to lower plant population, and for 40% plant population trts. *100 seed weight increased as plant population decreased*a yield decrease was measured only at 40% plant population

5.1

0.0001

10786.0

July 27 Aug 25

BBCH

(0‐100)Plant Development PPFD

0.44450.61780.3324NSNS

0.00400.21950.79441.8NS

July 27 July 27 July 27Aug 25 Aug 25

NSNS NSNS NS NS NSNS NS NS NSNS NS0.56.4 6.01.1 5.74.1 6.8 8.5 401.0

0.00010.1979 0.26320.0565 0.00010.6057 0.0177 0.0112 0.2632

Plant Population(#/ha) (% of desired)

PlantPlant Height

(cm)(g)Aug 25 (kg/ha) (bu/ac)

YieldGreenseeker

(0‐1) Seed Wt100

July 15 July 15

Plant

NS

Dry Weight(g)

July 27

0.8151

2.2

0.00010.40218.5

0.00010.07596.8

0.00020.12565.710786.0

0.04600.09125.1

0.00780.4037NS

Factor A

Factor B

0.00010.0858

0.00010.02790.1035NS

0.00010.0664NS

0.00010.7426NS

0.00390.1558NS

0.00390.1558NS

0.00010.76660.5

35

Cultivar x Population Small Seed RidgetownUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus

TargetTrt PopulationNo. Cultivar (plants/ha)

1 T9905 180417 a 86 a 24.3 a 55.8 b 4.1 a 36.4 a 0.43 a 0.84 a 66 b 8.1 a 8.0 b 24.5 a 3450 b 51.3 b2 Nautica 186250 a 87 a 21.6 a 62.8 a 2.5 b 23.7 b 0.38 a 0.82 a 80 a 5.3 a 8.0 b 19.0 b 3484 b 51.8 b3 Rexeter 198125 a 94 a 23.3 a 54.1 b 3.3 ab 29.0 b 0.42 a 0.85 a 65 b 4.4 a 14.0 a 22.6 a 3992 a 59.4 a4 Zorro 149583 b 70 b 22.6 a 62.1 a 2.7 b 35.9 ab 0.36 a 0.79 b 71 ab 8.5 a 8.0 b 22.4 a 3148 c 46.8 c

1 300,000 259375 a 86 a 24.4 a 59.7 a 2.7 b 24.2 b 0.44 a 0.87 a 65 a 4.0 b 9.0 a 23.4 a 3769 a 56.0 a2 240,000 211667 b 88 a 23.4 a 59.6 a 2.9 b 28.8 b 0.42 a 0.86 a 70 a 5.8 b 9.0 a 20.9 a 3723 a 55.4 a3 180,000 148125 c 82 a 22.4 a 60.1 a 3.0 b 35.4 a 0.38 b 0.83 b 76 a 6.1 b 10.0 a 22.3 a 3514 a 52.3 a4 120,000 95208 d 80 a 21.5 a 55.5 b 4.1 a 36.6 a 0.35 b 0.75 c 72 a 10.4 a 9.0 a 21.9 a 3067 b 45.6 b


Notes:Planting Date: June 5, 2015Harvest Dates: September 15 (103 DAP)

Conclusions:* plant populations were lower for Zorro, dispite being adjusted for seed germination* plant height was shorter for 40% plant populations* plant dry weight increased as the plant population decreased* Greenseeker scores decreased as plant population decreased for both rating dates* higher PPFD scores (more light penetration) were found at 40% plant populations. *100 seed weight was not affected by plant population*a yield decrease was measured only at 40% plant population

0.23000.587811.0

0.01630.4383NS

0.01550.5148NS

0.00010.26940.04

0.00010.29723.8

0.00010.2972256.7

0.95830.04243.0

0.14550.89982.1

0.04700.54923.7

0.01830.34650.9

0.00320.13107.223195.0

0.41850.837711.0

0.26880.3334NS

Factor A

Factor B

0.00010.5936

NS

Dry Weight(g)

July 16

0.0052

0.9

PlantPlant Population

(#/ha) (% of desired)

PlantPlant Height

(cm)(g)

Pod

Aug 6 Aug 4 (%) (kg/ha) (bu/ac)Yield

PPFDGreenseeker(0‐1) Maturity Seed Wt

100

July 7 July 7 July 16 July 13 July 13Aug 11 Aug 10

0.00010.0019 0.00010.0009 0.0011 0.0001 0.0295 0.1224 0.00010.3322 0.0811 0.0236 0.0001

NS7.2 3.823195.0 NS 3.7 0.04 4.0 NSNS 0.06 NS 256.7NSNS NSNS NS NS NS NS 6NS NS NS NS

36

Fungicide efficacy of dry bean white mold [Sclerotinia sclerotiorum(Lib.) de Bary, causal organism] and economic analysis at moderate tohigh disease pressure

Cara M. McCreary a, *, Donald Depuydt a, Richard J. Vyn b, Chris L. Gillard a

a Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, Ontario, N0P 2C0 Canadab Department of Food, Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, Ontario, N0P 2C0 Canada

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 3 May 2015Received in revised form3 October 2015Accepted 28 December 2015Available online xxx

Keywords:Phaseolus vulgarisSynthetic fungicideBiofungicideDisease managementProfit margin

a b s t r a c t

White mold [Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, causal organism] is an economically damaging diseaseof dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Producers often require fungicides to control moderate to high diseaselevels. Evaluation of fungicide efficacy and cost is critical to make cognisant management decisions. Fourfield studies were conducted at the Huron Research Station, near Exeter, Ontario in 2012 and 2013.Commercially available synthetic fungicides and a biofungicide seed treatment were evaluated for effi-cacy in suppressing white mold of dry bean and a subsequent economic analysis was conducted. Areaunder the disease progress curve (AUDPC) was calculated using disease intensity (incidence� severity)ratings. The untreated control and biofungicide seed treatment had the highest AUDPC values, and inaddition to the two applications of the low rate of fluxapyroxad þ pyraclostrobin and two applications ofpenthiopyrad, had the lowest yields. The most efficacious products with regard to disease suppressionand yield response were two applications of boscalid, all rates of fluazinam and thiophanate-methyl, andtwo applications of the high rate of fluopyram þ prothioconazole. Two applications of the high rate offluazinam had the lowest AUDPC, which was nearly 60% lower than the untreated control. Two appli-cations of the high rate of thiophanate-methyl was the highest yielding treatment, recovering 70% ofyield lost from untreated plots. Economic impacts varied with planting dates. For the first planting, profitmargins for all fungicide treatments, with the exception of two applications of penthiopyrad, two ap-plications of the low rate of fluxapyroxad þ pyraclostrobin, and the biofungicide seed treatment, weresignificantly greater than the untreated control. For the second planting, only profit margins for allfluazinam treatments were significantly greater than the untreated control. This study identifies neweconomically viable fungicide options for dry bean producers to control white mold.

© 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1. Introduction

White mold [Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, causal or-ganism] is a serious and economically damaging disease of drybean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Development of white mold occurswhen sclerotia, the overwintering bodies of S. sclerotiorum, produceapothecia that release ascospores that infect senescent blossomsbefore spreading to green plant tissue (Abawi and Grogan, 1979;McDonald and Boland, 2004). Timing of infection, thick crop can-opies and high levels of moisture have been identified as important

indicators of disease incidence and severity (Tu, 1989; McDonaldand Boland, 2004). Infection can lead to necrosis, girdling andpossibly plant death, resulting in significant yield and quality re-ductions (Kerr et al., 1978; Boland and Hall, 1987; McDonald andBoland, 2004).

Dry bean yield reductions caused by white mold infection andsymptom development have been previously studied. Estimatedyield losses as great as 23 kg ha�1 for each percentage increase inwhite mold incidence (del Rio et al., 2004; Ramasubramaniamet al., 2008) have been reported in both irrigated and nonirri-gated fields. During a year with high white mold pressure, totalyield loss estimates for commercial dry bean operations in NorthDakota averaged 524 kg ha�1 (Ramasubramaniam et al., 2008). Kerret al. (1978) observed that severe white mold epidemics resulted in

Abbreviations: AUDPC, area under the disease progress curve.* Corresponding author.

E-mail address: [email protected] (C.M. McCreary).

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Crop Protection

journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/cropro

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.12.0200261-2194/© 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Crop Protection 82 (2016) 75e81

37

edible bean agronomy and pest management research results 2015 · this report is a compilation of...

Documents