edp 2001 planning meeting november 7, 2001 outcomes note: includes several slides from itrs-2001...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
EDP 2001 Planning MeetingNovember 7, 2001OUTCOMES
Note: Includes several slides from ITRS-2001 Design chapter planning. It would be nice if the EDP community could contribute to the evolution of “Design Process” text in the ITRS. Don Cottrell of SI2 is the contact point for this.
Agenda
• Status Update• Call for Papers, web page
• Charter, Scope, Goals• “niche”, objectives
• Constituencies: EDPS, SI2, CANDE, …
• Special Sessions• invited talks, panels
• Call for Participation
• Action Items / Schedule Going Forward
Misc Action Items/Decisions• OK to have ACM SIGDA “in collaboration” sponsorship; David
should seek this• Sponsorship ideas/contacts ($1500 per): send to David• Registration and paper submission process, plus email based paper
submission option, should be up on the web ASAP• Should investigate other hotels in Monterey (same weekend) in case
Monterey Beach Hotel is “not modern enough”: this is on Rik, David• Agreed to go for an EDP summary of interoperability discussion, at the
Interoperability Workshop before DAC-2001• Jose, Dwight add to program committee (put program committee up
on web/organization chart as well); JohnD add to steering / program committee as well? JohnD, is this okay?
• REWRITE THE CFP AND MISSION, based on discussion at this meeting (this is on Andrew, David)
Charter and Scope - SUMMARY“It’s the Methodology, Stupid”Audience: CAD System Integrators and Methodologists Best practices and war stories “from the trenches” Futures (Methodologies, Tools, Interoperability / Initiatives, Technology Drivers) (Issues: - Metrics: Effort/Cost, Productivity, TAT - Human issues / design team complexities and their management / education and training - Scaling the methodology (from pipecleaner to diskbuster)DOMAINS – FOCUS AREAS Functional Verification *** HW/SW Codesign (?) RTL-Down / Timing Closure *** IP Reuse (maybe not as interesting, if we want to focus on 2-3 areas)DRIVER CLASSES (WHERE IS THE SILICON GOING) – FOCUS AREAS Analog/Mixed-Signal, RF, MEMS SOC
Sample Program – Summary (Incomplete – send suggestions)
Interoperability PanelDAPICFormats and Scripting LanguageseDesignHuman Factors and Design Team ScalingMethodology Development and ScalingMethodologies for SOC IntegrationMethodologies for Back-End Timing ClosureMethodologies for Functional VerificationBreakoutsMeasuring the Methodology
Process for UsSpecific targeted invitations (put them into the Call
for Participation bootstrap)
ITRS-2001 Design and System Drivers Chapters
• Scope of Design Technology• Cost, productivity, quality, and other metrics of Design
Technology• Driver classes and associated emphases
– Analog/RF/MEMS– ASIC = compiled HDL gates – High-volume custom = uP, DSP, embedded memories,
reprogrammable…– SOC: high integration, low cost, low TTM
• Resulting needs (e.g., power, reprogrammability, cost-driven design)
Scenario for SoC Productivity
Year 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014Node 180 nm 130 nm 100 nm 70 nm 50 nm 35 nm
% Area New Logic 64% 32% 16% 8% 4% 2%% Area Reused Logic 16% 16% 13% 9% 6% 4%% Area Memory 20% 52% 71% 83% 90% 94%Transistor Logic Density (Mtrans/cm2) 20 54 133 328 811 2000New Logic Productivity (Mtrans/PY) 1,4 2,1 2,9 4,2 6,0 8,6Reused Logic Productivity (Mtrans/PY) 2,9 4,1 5,9 8,4 12,0 17,1Target Design Resource (PY) 10,0 10,5 10,1 9,9 9,7 9,6
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
% Area Memory
% Area ReusedLogic
% Area New Logic
Scenario: major increase in memory content
Core ITRS-2001 Figures and Tables
• Table – Metrics of Design Technology• Figure – Evolution of Design System Architecture• Figure – “Business Design Driver” Classes