educational service provider evaluation form · educational service provider evaluation form ... or...

1

Educational Service Provider Evaluation Form The charter contract requires an annual evaluation of the Educational Service Provider (ESP) as per the ESP Policy:

Section A3:

Note to Academy Boards: This instrument has been designed to assist Boards in the evaluation of their Educational Service Provider (ESP) as per the contractual policy of the Ferris State University Charter Schools Office (CSO). The completed form must:

1. Be signed by each member of the Board and a representative of the ESP 2. Reviewed with the ESP in a regular public meeting of the Board 3. Submitted to Epicenter no later than October 31 of each year

The instrument has been broken into key sections for the Board’s consideration: Evidence: In addition to the rating points, the Board must list evidence as to how the score given was reached. The list need not be all inclusive, but should be fairly representative.

Key Sections Points

Educational Goal Achievement 45 points

Instructional Leadership 25 points

Business 15 points

School Culture 25 points

Relationships 25 points

“If an Academy proposes to enter into a new, amended or renewal agreement with an ESP to provide persons to perform work at the Academy, or to extend the term of an existing agreement, the Academy shall, not later than thirty (30) days prior to the proposed date of execution thereof, submit the proposed agreement and a detailed description of the means by which the Educational Service Provider will be held accountable to the Academy Board for the day‐to‐day performance of the Educational Service Provider’s obligations under such agreement for review by the CSO Director as well as a copy of the completed evaluation instrument due by October 31 of each year. The evaluation instrument shall be devised by the CSO with the completed instrument reviewed with the ESP at a regular meeting of the Academy Board prior to submission of the completed evaluation instrument.”

2

Academy Name: Educational Service Provider:

AREA – 1: EDUCATIONAL GOAL ACHIEVEMENT (45 points total) All FSU‐authorized academies are held to the following Educational Goal: “Prepare all students academically for success in college, work, and life”. (All information required for the Board to determine whether these goals have been achieved is in the Academic Performance Report issued by the CSO and the contractual educational goals)

Measure 1: Student Growth

Is this academy currently meeting this goal? Met Target (15 points) Partially Met Target (7.5 points) Did not Meet Target (0 Points)

Measure 2: Student Achievement

Is this academy currently meeting this goal? Met Target (15 points) Partially Met Target (7.5 points) Did Not Meet Target (0 points)

Grade(s) Metric Growth Targets

Grades 2‐8

Growth made by students from fall‐to‐spring in reading and math as measured by scaled scores on the Performance Series by Scantron®.

Students’ academic growth will demonstrate, on average, quantifiable academic progress as specified in Item C in the policy towards the grade‐level reading and math college readiness achievement targets identified in Appendix A.

Grades 8‐12 Growth made by students in reading, math, science, and English as measured by subject scores on the EXPLORE, PLAN and ACT tests.

Students’ academic growth between tests, on average, will demonstrate quantifiable academic progress as specified in Item C in the policy toward the grade‐level reading, math, science and English college readiness achievement targets identified in Appendix A.

Grade(s) Metric Achievement Targets

Grades 2‐8

The average college readiness level based on scaled scores from the Performance Series by Scantron ® reading and math tests administered in the spring.

Students enrolled for three or more years will, on average, achieve scaled scores equal to or greater than the grade‐level reading and math college readiness achievement targets identified in Appendix A.

Grades 8‐12 The average college readiness level based on subject scores from the EXPLORE®, PLAN® and ACT®

tests by ACT, Inc. administered in the spring.

Students enrolled for three or more years will, on average, achieve EXPLORE, PLAN and ACT subject scores equal to or greater than the grade‐level reading, math, science and English college readiness achievement targets identified in Appendix A.

3

Measure 3: Student Achievement‐Relative Performance and State/Federal Accountability

Is this academy currently meeting this goal? Met Target (15 points) Partially Met Target (7.5 points) Did Not Meet Target (0 points) New Academies (in existence for less than three years), and Strict Discipline Academies please note below:

a) New Academies After the first and second year of operation, new academies will be expected to improve academic achievement for all groups of students using the following measures: Measure 1: Student Growth Measure 2: Student Achievement‐ Exempt Measure 3: Relative Performance and State/Federal Accountability

At the completion of the third year, cohorts (students enrolled three years) will be established allowing the FSU‐CSO to measure student achievement using Performance Series testing data.

b) Strict Discipline Academies Academies designated as Strict Discipline Academies as per the Michigan School Code may be exempted from certain parts of these requirements due to their unique nature. In all cases, specific educational goals will be mutually developed and agreed upon by the Academy and FSU‐CSO and shall be attached to this contract.

For the remaining questions, a 5‐point rating scale is used. Boards should select the number that closest aligns with their rating for the question. AREA – 2: INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP (25 POINTS TOTAL) 1. The ESP provides the necessary leadership to ensure that financial and

human resources are appropriately aligned to achieve the academy’s contractual goals.

1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐2‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐3‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐4‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐5 Definitely Definitely Untrue True

Grade(s) Metric Achievement Targets

Grades 3‐9

Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP)

On average, the Academy will score equal to or greater than the performance of its Composite Resident District in reading and math. Grade 11 Michigan Merit Examination

(MME)

Grades 3‐9 and 11

State Accountability Scorecard/MEAP

In order to assure that academies authorized by FSU meet the requirements of the state accreditation system, the Academy will (achieve/sustain) a 75% or higher.

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

4

2. The ESP provides the necessary leadership to ensure that financial and

human resources are appropriately aligned to achieve the academy’s vision, mission, and core values.


3. The ESP takes a leadership role to ensure alignment of the curriculum and

instruction to meet contractual goals that has resulted in improved academic achievement.


4. The ESP sets sufficiently high achievement expectations for teaching and

learning that have resulted in steadily improved academic achievement.


5. The Board of Directors is satisfied with the academic results produced by

the ESP as measured annually on the Academic Performance Report issued by the CSO.


AREA – 3: BUSINESS (15 POINTS TOTAL) 1. The ESP provides sound fiscal management and budget oversight.


lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

5

2. The ESP provides the necessary support for facility management.


3. The ESP provides timely and appropriate professional development for all

staff to keep them abreast of trends and requirements in the educational field.


AREA – 4: SCHOOL CULTURE (25 POINTS TOTAL) 1. The ESP promotes staff collaboration and communication through a

wide variety of methods.


2. The ESP implements procedures to monitor academy climate and culture

and to make modifications in practices if necessary.


3. The ESP takes issues of diversity into consideration and has appropriate

practices and procedures to ensure that all groups are treated equitably.


lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

6

4. The ESP has established a program for coaching and monitoring staff

that meet requirements of State law. 1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐2‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐3‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐4‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐5 Definitely Definitely Untrue True

5. The ESP utilizes fair and consistent evaluations for all staff.


AREA – 5: Relationships (25 points total) 1. Representatives from the ESP corporate office are visible and

approachable to the Board and academy staff.


2. The ESP keeps the Board abreast of upcoming changes in law and

educational practice.


3. The ESP is responsive to requests and directions from the academy

Board.


lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

7

4. The ESP engages in ethical and fair treatment of all staff.


5. The ESP maintains good communication with the Board of Directors

between meetings and provides good support materials for Board meetings in a timely manner.


General comments by the Board of Directors: (Areas of satisfaction during the past year and supplemental goals or areas of growth for the coming year)

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

lewiss26

Typewritten Text

Evidence:

8

Tally Sheet Key Sections Total Points Possible Total Points AwardedEducational Goal Achievement 45

Instructional Leadership 25

Business 15

School Culture 25

Relationships 25

Total Points 135 General Findings: 121‐135 Exceeds Standards 101‐120 Meets Standards 81‐100 *Needs Improvement 80 & Below *Deficient *Any score of “Needs Improvement” or “Deficient” must be accompanied by a plan of correction including the monitoring of the plan by the Board.

9

Board Signatures: _______________________________________ ___________________________

Name Date

_______________________________________ ___________________________ Name Date

_______________________________________ ___________________________

Name Date

_______________________________________ ___________________________ Name Date

_______________________________________ ___________________________

Name Date

_______________________________________ ___________________________ Name Date

_______________________________________ ___________________________

Name Date Educational Service Provider Representative: _______________________________________ ___________________________

Name Date Date of Board Meeting Review: _________________________

educational service provider evaluation form · educational service provider evaluation form ... or...

Documents