ee141 1 language janusz a. starzyk

14
EE141 1 Language Language Janusz A. Starzyk http://grey.colorado.edu/CompCogNeuro/index.php/CECN_CU_Boulder_OReilly http://grey.colorado.edu/CompCogNeuro/index.php/Main_Page Based on book Cognition, Brain and Consciousness ed. Bernard J. Baars courses taught by Prof. Randall O'Reilly, University of Colorado, and http://wikipedia.org/ Cognitive Cognitive Architectures Architectures

Upload: arabella-oconnor

Post on 30-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE1411

LanguageLanguage

Janusz A. Starzyk

http://grey.colorado.edu/CompCogNeuro/index.php/CECN_CU_Boulder_OReillyhttp://grey.colorado.edu/CompCogNeuro/index.php/Main_Page

Based on book Cognition, Brain and Consciousness ed. Bernard J. Baars

courses taught by Prof. Randall O'Reilly, University of Colorado, and http://wikipedia.org/

Cognitive ArchitecturesCognitive Architectures

Page 2: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE1412

Modeling speechModeling speechModels account for:distributed lexicon, orthography, phonology, semantics.

The same learning mechanisms in the brain, but different inputs/outputs.

Levels of processing: phonemes/syllables, letters, words, ideas, phrases, sentences, situations, stories.

Distributed representations, great possibilities of combining many representations

Semantic representations of word co-occurrence.

Semantic representations on the level of sentence shapes.

Phonological neighborhood density of words = the number of words that sound similar to a given word, so creating similar activations in the brain.

Semantic neighborhood density of words = the number of words with a similar meaning (widened activation subnetwork).

Page 3: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE1413

Learning based on processing temporal sequencesWord sequences must produce meaning representationsLanguage is the result of unpacking distributed meaning

representations in the brain and communicating them to other

people through communication channels, with the expectation

that their corresponding representations will be created in the

brain of the receiver

Learning to read

dyslexia

Sign recognition, mapping orthography onto phonology (not trivial for

English) and intonations (important in Chinese)

Regularities and exceptions

creating too-regular past tenses.

Modeling speechModeling speech

Page 4: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE1414

Biological foundationsBiological foundations

Controlling the vocal apparatus is responsible for the correct pronunciation of syllables. Mainly responsible for this control is Broca's area in the frontal cortex; for speech analysis, Wernicke's area in the superior temporal lobe. Broca's: surface representation, Wernicke's: deep representation.

Page 5: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE1415

QuestionsQuestionsWe will try, with the help of computer simulations, to find and verify with

the help of models, the answers to several questions:

What processes are involved in the reading process and why do they sometimes let us down (dyslexia)?

How do we read known words: cat, yacht, and how do we read invented words, eg. nust, deciding on some pronunciation?

Why do children say "I goed” instead of "I went”?

Where does the meaning of words come from?

How to go from words to sentences?

Page 6: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE1416

Distributed lexicon and dyslexiaDistributed lexicon and dyslexiaPhonological level of dyslexia:

nonexistent words don't activate

deeper areas (Wernicke's).

Deep level: phonological and

semantic errors (cat – cot, cat - dog),

mistakes in sign recognition.

Surface dyslexia: new words don't create a problem, but there is a lack of access to the semantic level + difficulties in reading exception words + mistakes in recognition.

A model of reading and dyslexia has two paths from orthography to phonology: direct (by mapping) and indirect, via semantics. Uncommon and difficult words are pronounced through the indirect pathway.

Page 7: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE1417

ReadingReading

Reading models: mapping orthography onto phonology.

Two issues: can one system learn to pronounce regular words and simultaneously

deal with exception words? simulating pronunciation of nonexistent words requires the discovery

of subtle regularities of pronuncation.

Mint, hint, flint => "i" is the same, but in pint it's different...

Regularities are often modified, depending on the context, they have

groupings (neighborhoods), and exceptions are on the extremes of

these modifications.

Regularities and exceptions form a continuum.

Page 8: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE1418

ReadingReading: distributed lexical model: distributed lexical model

Representations are not localized in one region.

Interactions lead to an interesting division of labor.

Page 9: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE1419

Word meaningWord meaning

Idea semantics is the result of

activations distributed across

many areas.

Simplest model: Strong Hebbian

correlations between words, like

correlations between elements of

images or phonemes creating

syllables.

LSA- Latent Semantic Analysis,

type of PCA, which can be

realized by Hebbian learning.

Page 10: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE14110

Words in the brainWords in the brainPsycholinguistic experiments about speech show that in the brain we have discrete phonological representations, and not acoustic ones.

Acoustic signal => phonemes => words => semantic concepts.

Semantic activations follow 90 ms after phonological activations (N200 ERPs).

F. Pulvermuller (2003) The Neuroscience of Language. On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order. Cambridge University Press.

Action networks – observations, findings of ERP and fMRI tests.

Page 11: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE14111

WordsWords: : simple modelsimple modelGoals: making the simplest model of creative thinking; creating interesting new names, conveying product features; understanding new words, which aren't in the dictionary.

A model inspired by overlapping brain processes which happen during invention of new words. Given is a set of key words, which activate the auditory cortex.

Phonemes are resonances, orderly activation of phonemes activates known words and new combinations equally; context + inhibition in the winner-takes-all process leaves one word.

Creativity = imagination (fluctuations) + filtering (competition)Imagination: many temporary resonances arise in parallel, activating representations of words and non-words, depending on the connection strength of oscillators. Filtering: associations, emotions, phonological/semantic density.

Page 12: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE14112

Associations - revisionAssociations - revision

Why does priming neutral for simple associations and nonsensical words worsen results for creative people?

Weak creativity = weak associations (connections) between oscillators; adding noise (nonsensical words) strengthens already overlapping oscillations, enabling mutual activations; for a strongly connected neural network and simple associations, it leads to confusion, when it activates many states.

For difficult associations, adding noise in weakly creative people won't help because of a lack of connections, priming words cause only chaos.

For orthographically similar priming words with close associations, this activates the representation of the second word, always increasing the chance of resonance and shortening latency.

Page 13: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE14113

QuizQuiz

Project sem.proj.gz, description 10.6.2

An already trained network responds to questions...

Page 14: EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk

EE14114

Questions/answers concerning languageQuestions/answers concerning languageWhat processes are involved in the reading process and why do they

sometimes betray us (dyslexia)? Distributed lexical representations, interactions between sign recognition, level of spelling (orthography), phonology and semantics.

How do we read known words: cat, yacht, and how do we read invented words, eg. nust? Thanks to contextually activated representations, giving a continuum between regular forms and exceptions.

Why do children say "I goed” instead of "I went”? Because of the dynamic equilibrium between mapping regular forms and exceptions.

Where does the meaning of words come from? Statistics of co-occurrence, interactions with representations of sensory data.

How to go from words to sentences? This is enabled by the "Sentence Gestalt" (a theory in psychology).