eea and norway grants programme risk management
DESCRIPTION
EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management. Inger K. Stoll , Head of Communication, Reporting and Evaluation, Financial Mechanism Office November 2012. Results and risks. What is Results Based Management (RBM) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EEA and Norway GrantsProgramme risk management
EEA and Norway GrantsProgramme risk management
Inger K. Stoll, Head of Communication, Reporting and Evaluation, Financial Mechanism OfficeNovember 2012
Inger K. Stoll, Head of Communication, Reporting and Evaluation, Financial Mechanism OfficeNovember 2012
1
![Page 2: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Results and risks
What is Results Based Management (RBM)RBM is a management strategy by which all actors, contributing directly or indirectly to achieving a set of results, ensure that their processes, products and services contribute to the achievement of desired results (outputs, outcomes and impact)
What is a result and a risk?
In the context of the Grants: A result is the output, outcome or impact of a development intervention
A risk is an event that may occur and impede the objective
2
![Page 3: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
KEY CONCEPTS
Results achievement
Beneficiary oriented
Managing for results and reduced risks
3
![Page 4: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Risks
• Risks are an expression of uncertainty• Risks are events that may occur, and if they occur,
have harmful or negative effects on the achievement of results
• Risks are closely related to the results and should consequently be analysed against the results framework of a programme
• Risk analyses strengthen the basis for choosing realistic objectives and level of ambitions
4
![Page 5: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Risk management process in 8 steps
5
Establish strategy and processes
1.Develop a strategy for integrating risk management in results management
2.Establish risk leadership integrated in results management
Analysis, actions and follow-up on several levels
3. Identify objectives at all levels4. Identify critical success factors (assumptions) at all levels
![Page 6: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Risk management process in 8 steps
6
5. Identify risks at all levels
6. Assess and prioritise the risks, in terms of likelihood and impact; high – medium – low
7. Address risks: avoid, reduce, share, accept
8. Mitigate and manage risks
Learning – change - communication
![Page 7: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Step 1. Develop a risk strategy
• Develop a risk strategy for integrating risk management in results management.
• This presentation gives some basic tools to risk management at Programme level.
FMO’s risk management strategy (in process):http://www.eeagrants.org/asset/4814/1/4814_1.pdf
7
![Page 8: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Risk management levels
Risk strategy at each level, according to roles and responsibilities
8
ProgrammeProgrammeCountry
Projects
Total Grants
![Page 9: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Step 2: Establish risk leadership
• All actors shall ensure that relevant risks are identified and analysed, and that actions are taken, if possible, to reduce the likelihood of negative incidents and limit any adverse effects to acceptable levels
• Assign roles at each level• Programme Operator must actively take
leadership at programme and for project levels
9
![Page 10: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Step 3: Identify objectivesat all levels, exampleObjective (impact)Widespread improvements in societ or a sectorGender equality and work-life balance promoted
Outcome(s)Intermediate effects on target groups and systemsGender pay gap reduced
OutputsProducts and services delivered1. Wage negotiations are gender sensitive. 2. Training is carried out.
ActivitiesTasks transforming inputs to outputs.1.Present statistics on gender wage differences2. Train trade unions and employers associations in g. pay gap reduction
InputsFinancial, human and material resourcesBudget: X € , Input from DPP (y people z €), Resources from local institutions10
![Page 11: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Step 3. Identify objectives at all levels
11
Increased share of renewable energy in energy use
Increased renewable energy production
Increased awareness of and education in renewable energy solutions
More energy efficient RES in place
X policies at local and regional level to stimulate RES developed
100 MW capacity RES constructed and in operation
X awareness raising programmes at local level carried through
X training courses in RES provided to officials at local and regional level
Objective (pre-defined)
Expected outcome(s) (pre-defined)
Outputs
Types of projects
•Modernised RES infrastructure
•R&D on RES
•Feasibility of RES mapped out in relation to local conditions
•Training in RES planning competence
•Plans/policy development
•Windmills
•Solar systems
•Hydropower
•Bioenergy
•Awareness raising campaigns at local level
•Train the trainers
•Training courses for officials at regional level
•Training courses for officials at regional level
Example – Renewable Energy
![Page 12: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Step 4: Identify assumptions
• Assumptions are the necessary positive conditions that allow for a succesful cause-and-effect relationship between the different levels of results.
• Assumptions are critical success factors.• Assumptions are expressed as positive
statements.• Assumptions are formulated after the objectives
to ensure results chain realism12
![Page 13: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Step 4: Identify assumptionsat all levelsObjective (impact)Widespread improvements in society or a sector
Assumptions and risks
Outcome(s)Intermediate effects ontarget groups and systems
Assumptions and risk
OutputsProducts and servicesdelivered
Assumptions and risks
ActivitiesTasks transforming inputs to outputs
Assumptions and risks
InputsFinancial, human and material resources
Assumptions and risks
13
![Page 14: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Step 4: AssumptionsAn example
• Outcome: Participation in local election increases from 63% in 2012 to 75% in 2016.
• Output: Voters registration increases from 70% in 2012 to 90% in 2016.
• Assumption: Voting centres are operational and in place on voting day.
14
![Page 15: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Step 5: Identify risks at all levels
• Risk identification is done in all phases of a programme, but early identification gives the best effect.
• Normally requires several contributers.• If a critical assumption is likely to occur but
not certain, it may represent a risk.• Risks are expressed as negative statements in
relation to achievement of the desired result.
15
![Page 16: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Step 5. Risk identification
• Identify the risk, monitor, manage and try to influence. A risk registry can be useful.
• There might be a conflict of interest regarding sharing information of risks.
• Keep in mind: Always document your risk identification, analysis and mitigation
16
![Page 17: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Identification of a riskAn example
Impact (Objective) Assumptions Risks
OutcomeParticipation in local election increases from 63% in 2012 to 75% in 2016.
OutputVoters registration increases from 70% in 2012 to 90% in 2016.
Voting centres are operational and with all logicistics in place on voting day.
Voting material is not available in all local languages.
Activities
Inputs17
![Page 18: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Risk categories
It is common to group the risks in categories. We have identified nine risk categories:
•Policy and politics•Governance: Institutional, management, transparency and accountability•Corruption and procurement issues •Socio-cultural and gender equity, minorities, Roma, rights and values
18
![Page 19: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Risk categories
• Financial issues• Economic issues• Environmental and climate issues• Technical and technological issues• Role of DPPs and project partners
19
![Page 20: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Risk dimensions
Each risk category consists of certain risk dimensions (expressed as critical sucess factor or assumptions): Example Governance category:
•Competence and capacity, skills available•Supportive legal framework conditions•Institutional framework is conducive•Control systems in place•Open and transparent systems in place
20
![Page 21: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Cross cutting issues
Keep in mind the cross-cutting issues:•Governance•Gender equality•Sustainable development: - Environmental - Economic - Social
These are reflected in the risk categories. Cross-cutting issues are asssessed and addressed in all phases of the Program Cycle
21
![Page 22: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Step 6: Assess and prioritisethe risks
A risk analysis contains an assessment of the risks in terms of•Probability or likelyhood of the occurence of the risks•Consequences if the event occursAs the risk assessment is a forward-looking exercise, the assessment should take into account the whole agreement period - and beyond - to ensure sustainability of the results
22
![Page 23: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Risk probability and consequence
23
![Page 24: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Risk Analysis
High riskKiller assumption
“Black Swan”
24
Low Medium High
Consequence
![Page 25: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Narrative risk summary
• The risk rating is accompanied by a narrative assessment highlighting the major risks identified.
• All the high or substantial risk ratings are named as major risks
Keep in mind: Distinguish probability and consequence
25
![Page 26: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Step 7: Address the risks – Risk tolerance levels
Risks are inevitable.
It is not an aim to avoid risks at all costs.
A higher risk may be acceptable in contexts where the expected impact and benefits are higher than the potential risks.
26
![Page 27: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Risk tolerance
• Decisions regarding tolerance of major risks can be divided in the folllowing strategies:
Avoid/terminate: Redesign programme or terminate the programme or parts of it.
Transfer/share: Share risk with other partners (ex DPPs) or pass the impact
of the risk to third part (e.g. via an insurance policy)
27
![Page 28: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Risk tolerance
Accept: Accept the risks without any mitigating actions, but monitor and
manage if the risk level increases
Reduce, prevent, mitigate: Prepare a mitigation plan and implement measures.
28
![Page 29: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Step 8: Mitigate and manage risks
• Establish a system for risk monitoring and handling.
• During implementation it is good practice to incorporate the mitigating measures in the regular work plan of the programme or projects, assign staff members responsible for actions and resources required.
29
![Page 30: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Mitigation and management
• Assess the implementation progress of the mitigating measures, manage and report.
• Identify any new risks or changes in circumstances and add to your risk registry and work plan.
• Sometimes we need to redesign our risk mitigation strategy and actions.
30
![Page 31: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Risk mitigation
31
![Page 32: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Reporting and dialogue
• The programme risk management will be reported in the Annual Programme Report and in the NFP’s Annual Strategic Report
• The risk picture and the possible mitigating actions will be a central element in the dialogue between donors, beneficiaries and the FMO
32
![Page 33: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Risks to achievment of outcomes
• At the programme level, the FMO bases its risk assessment on the Programme Proposal, the Annual Programme Report the Annual Strategic Report from the NFP and the dialogue. EU analyses are also used.
• The FMO especially focuses on likelihood and consequence of risks to achievement of the outcomes = output to outcome review
33
![Page 34: EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56813827550346895d9fd621/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Results for the beneficiaries
• We are interested in achieving results for the beneficiaries, e g the higher level objectives, and correspondingly interested in the higher level risks
We are in it together!
34