effect of habitat structure on reproduction and prey capture of...

36
Effect of Habitat Structure on Reproduction and Prey Capture of Pinguicula lutea a Rare Carnivorous Plant Samantha B. Primer, University of Illinois (UIUC) Brenda Molano-Flores, Illinois Natural History Survey Jenna Annis, Eastern Illinois University Janice Coons, Eastern Illinois University Mary Ann Feist, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Upload: others

Post on 16-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Effect of Habitat Structure on Reproduction and Prey Capture of Pinguicula lutea

    a Rare Carnivorous Plant

    Samantha B. Primer, University of Illinois (UIUC) Brenda Molano-Flores, Illinois Natural History Survey

    Jenna Annis, Eastern Illinois University Janice Coons, Eastern Illinois University

    Mary Ann Feist, University of Wisconsin-Madison

  • Habitat Modification

    TIME

  • Habitat Modification

  • Plant-Insect Interactions

  • Plant-Insect Interactions

  • “This plant, commonly called Venus’ fly-trap…is one of the most wonderful in the world.”

    Carnivorous Plants

  • “This plant, commonly called Venus’ fly-trap…is one of the most wonderful in the world.”

    Carnivorous Plants

  • …But So Much More

  • Pinguicula lutea

    Family: Lentibulariaceae

    Common Name: Yellow Butterwort

    Status: Threatened in FL

  • Habitat Structure

    • Cover class determined (% cover) using Daubenmire method

    • At each site, 5 1m2 quadrats were established along alternating sides of 30m transect.

    • At each site, 10 buds were randomly marked, monitored for fruit development.

    Maintained Grassy Woody

  • Ellison graph instead

    Pinguicula spp. Characteristics

    nectar spur

    anthers receptacle

    stigma

  • Ellison graph instead

    Pinguicula spp. Characteristics

    leaf margin

    stalked gland sessile gland

  • Overarching Question

    Does habitat structure affect plant-insect interactions of Pinguicula lutea?

  • Overarching Question

    Does habitat structure affect plant-insect interactions of Pinguicula lutea?

    Background Information:

    1. Determine reproductive ecology

    2. Survey arthropod abundance and prey capture

  • Reproductive Ecology

    Breeding System Pollinator Observations

    Pollen : Ovule High Low

    Previous Research

  • Floral Morphology Suggest Insect vector Breeding System Self-compatible, pollen vector required Pollinator Observations Insect vector on video Pollen to Ovule Ratio Consistent with facultative selfing

    Reproductive Ecology Summary

  • Treat. 1876. The Harper’s Monthly. Gibson.1991. American Midland Naturalist.

    Prey Community Previous Research

  • Prey Community Summary

    Prey Capture Main prey are Collembola and Diptera Collembola is most common Arthropod Availability Collembola and Diptera most abundant Some available Diptera too large trap

  • Overarching Question

    Does habitat structure affect reproduction and prey capture of Pinguicula lutea?

    Background Information:

    1. Determine reproductive ecology

    2. Survey arthropod abundance and prey capture 1. Determine reproduction and prey capture in

    three habitat structures

  • Cover class determined (% cover) At each site, 5 1m2 quadrats were established along alternating sides of 30m transect.

    • Reproduction

    – Fruit Set – Seed Set

    • Prey Capture • Prey Availability

    • Total sites = 13

    Sites = 13

    1m2 quadrats established

    Cover class determined (% cover)

    Quadrats = 5

    Vegetation Surveys

    Determining Structure

  • Determining Structure

    Cover class determined (% cover) At each site, 5 1m2 quadrats were established along alternating sides of 30m transect.

    • Reproduction

    – Fruit Set – Seed Set

    • Prey Capture • Prey Availability

    • Total sites = 13

    Maintained

    Grassy

    Woody

  • Reproduction

    Fruit Set Seed Set

    N = 10

    Sites = 13

  • Fruit Set

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    maintained grassy woody

    FinalFruitSet

    Pro

    po

    rtio

    n o

    f Fr

    uit

    s Fo

    rmed

    ANOVA F = 0.57, P = 0.58

  • 0.75

    0.8

    0.85

    0.9

    0.95

    maintained grassy woody

    SeedSet

    Seed Set P

    rop

    ort

    ion

    of

    Seed

    s Se

    t

    F = 1.54, p = 0.22

    ANOVA:

  • Habitat Structure on Reproduction

    High fruit set

    High seed set

    Habitat structure does not affect reproductive success

  • Prey Community Assessment

    Prey Capture Arthropod Availability

    N = 5

    Sites = 13

  • 0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    Total Collembola Diptera

    Maintained

    Grassy

    Woody

    Arthropod Availability M

    ean

    # A

    rth

    rop

    od

    s

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    Total ColembolaDiptera

    Maintained

    Grassy

    Woody

    F = 4.66, p = 0.01

    F = 4.3, p = 0.02

    F = 38.7,p

  • Prey Capture M

    ean

    # A

    rth

    rop

    od

    s

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Total Collembola Diptera

    Maintained

    Grassy

    Woody0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Total Collembola Diptera

    Maintained

    Grassy

    Woody

    F = 26.0, p

  • Habitat Structure on Prey Capture

    Habitat structure does affect prey capture and availability

    Microclimatic Conditions

    Light Availability Temperature

    Humidity

  • Habitat Structure on Prey Capture

    Habitat structure does affect prey capture and availability

    Microclimatic Conditions

    Light Availability Temperature

    Humidity

    Arthropods Trapping Mechanism

  • Microclimate affecting insects Microclimate affecting trapping mechanism Temperature humidity moisture

    Zamora.1995. Oikos.

    F

    Habitat Structure on Prey Capture

  • So I’ve established the patterns of these plant insect interactions

    Habitat Structure on Prey Capture

  • In Summary….

    • First comprehensive study of plant-insect interactions for SE

    Pinguicula spp.

    • In a fire dependent community these findings provide insight into how this species response to changes in habitat structure… i.e. What management or lack of management could mean for this species

    • Provides evidence that’s presents or absence of management does not seems to have an impact in terms of reproduction; however there are differences in terms of prey capture.

    First comprehensive study of plant-insect interactions for SE Pinguicula spp.

  • In Summary….

    First comprehensive study of plant-insect interactions for SE Pinguicula spp.

    • In a fire dependent community these findings provide insight into how this species responds to changes in habitat structure… i.e. What management or lack of management could mean for this species

    • Provides evidence that’s presents or absence of management does not seems to have an impact in terms of reproduction; however there are differences in terms of prey capture.

    Provides insight into how this species respond to changes in habitat structure

  • In Summary….

    First comprehensive study of plant-insect interactions for SE Pinguicula spp.

    Provides insight into how this species responds to changes in habitat structure

    Presence/absence of management may impact prey capture.

  • Acknowledgements COAUTHORS Brenda Molano-Flores Jenna Annis Janice Coons Mary Ann Feist BMF LAB Danielle Ruffatto David N. Zaya Ian Pearse Charlie Helm UNDERGRADUATE HELP Marialicia Chavez

    FIELD ASSISSTANTS/ HELP Caroline George Jean Mendelkoch Kevin Christman Melissa Primer Bill Booth Robin Kennedy TYNDALL AIRFORCE BASE Wendy Jones ST. JOE COMPANY Jim Moyers MASTER NATURALISTS

    FLORIDA FOREST SERVICE Michael Jenkins David Morse US FISH AND WILDLIFE Vivian Negron-Ortiz BUFFER PRESERVE Dylan Shoemaker Barry Townsend Sandra Chafin Allix North Lisa Duglecki Max & Pat Prucell Dave & Joy Peterson