effects of third parties in the us political science i

20
Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

Upload: sheryl-watkins

Post on 17-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

Effects of Third Parties in the USPolitical Science I

Page 2: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

2Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Copyright and Terms of Service

Copyright © Texas Education Agency, 2014. These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of TEA, except under the following conditions:

1)  Texas public school districts, charter schools, and Education Service Centers may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for the districts’ and schools’ educational use without obtaining permission from TEA.

2)  Residents of the state of Texas may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for individual personal use only, without obtaining written permission of TEA.

3)  Any portion reproduced must be reproduced in its entirety and remain unedited, unaltered and unchanged in any way.

4)  No monetary charge can be made for the reproduced materials or any document containing them; however, a reasonable charge to cover only the cost of reproduction and distribution may be charged.

Private entities or persons located in Texas that are not Texas public school districts, Texas Education Service Centers, or Texas charter schools or any entity, whether public or private, educational or non-educational, located outside the state of Texas MUST obtain written approval from TEA and will be required to enter into a license agreement that may involve the payment of a licensing fee or a royalty.

Contact TEA Copyrights with any questions you may have.

Page 3: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

3Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

What are the third parties of the US?

Page 4: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

4Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Formation of Third Parties: Goals

• Many third parties are rooted in social movements formed by activists

• The primary goal of these founders is to influence the public policy that supports their cause

• Many times, third parties have attempted to run campaigns to elect their candidates for office, but they have not been as successful as the two major parties

• Third parties also work to raise money so that they can compete in elections with the two major parties

• Even the groups that do eventually become political parties oftentimes have little influence on political elections

Page 5: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

5Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Formation of Third Parties: Sectionalism

• The major third parties find their roots in sectionalism• These are minor parties based on causes often neglected

by the major parties

• Third parties achieve their greatest success when they incorporate new ideas or alienated groups, such as• The Green Party: Environmentalists who broke away from

the Democrats• The Bull Moose/Progressive Party: The faction of the

Republican Party that gave Theodore Roosevelt the platform to run for President

Page 6: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

6Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Formation of Third Parties: Sectionalism (continued)

• Third parties are often the most successful when there is declining trust in the two major political parties

• The two major political parties however eventually adopt some of the ideas of the popular third parties in hopes that they can secure voters who support third party causes

Page 7: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

7Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Types of Third Parties: Issue Advocacy Parties• These parties are formed to promote a stance on a

particular issue• Most of these parties are short-lived since issues are

constantly evolving

• For example, the Green Party promotes environmental protection as a primary issue• Other issues addressed in their 2000 platform were greed,

corruption, globalization, and human rights• The Green Party only obtained 3 percent of the popular vote

in the 2000 presidential election and after the 2004 election, the popular vote had decreased to less than 1 percent

Page 8: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

8Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Types of Third Parties:Ideologically Oriented Parties• The agenda of an ideologically orientated party is typically

broader than that of an issue advocacy party• These parties are structured around ideology, a highly organized

and coherent framework concerning the nature and role of government in society• The political views of these parties are oftentimes more broad than

issue advocacy parties

• This type of third party includes the Libertarian Party and the Socialist Party• Libertarian Party: the ideological position that government should not

interfere with individuals’ social, political, and economic rights• Socialist Party: the ideological position that government should play a

large role in ensuring economic equality for all people

Page 9: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

9Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Types of Third Parties:Splinter Parties• A political party that breaks off, or “splinters”,

from one of the two major political parties• A third party often splinters off from the major

party because of internal disagreement on a particular issue• The Tea Party is considered a splinter party because of

disagreements within the Republican Party• However, the Tea Party has not officially separated

from the Republican Party because they do not run for election as “Tea Party candidates”

Page 10: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

10Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

How do third parties impact the political process?

Page 11: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

11Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Influencing Elections

• Third parties have not won elections in the US; however, they can influence electoral outcomes

• Third parties provide an outlet for voters who are dissatisfied with the major parties

• Although third parties are not necessarily effective at the national level, they can influence politics at the local level

• Third parties tend to help the major out-of-power party that is trying to win a national election

• The two-party system does not favor parties with extreme or unconventional views

Page 12: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

12Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Influencing the National Agenda

• Third parties also attempt to influence the national political agenda by drawing attention to particular issues

• Government officials within the two major parties respond to the concern even if the third party has no chance of winning an election• If the officials do not respond, it can cause backlash

within the electorate• Government officials also alter their political agendas

in hopes of swaying these third-party voters

Page 13: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

13Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

What barriers do third parties face?

Page 14: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

14Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Winner-Take-All System

• Unlike many European nations, the US has a plurality electoral system• Third parties would benefit more from proportional

representation

• Proportional representation is a voting system that would apportion legislative seats according to the percentage of votes a political party receives

• The winner-take-all system encourages the grouping of interests into as few parties as possible• The democratic minimum number of parties is two, such as

the US has

Page 15: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

15Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Campaign Finance

• The rules of public financing for US presidential elections also make it difficult for third parties

• If a candidate does not receive at least 5 percent of the popular vote in the presidential election then their party is not eligible for federal matching funds• In 2000 Ralph Nader missed the federal matching

funds cut off by 2 percent, so the Green Party did not receive funds in the 2004 presidential election

Page 16: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

16Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

How have third parties affected past presidential elections?

Page 17: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

17Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Affecting the Popular Vote: 1992 Presidential Election• Ross H. Perot ran in the 1992 presidential election

against Democratic candidate Bill Clinton and Republican candidate George H. W. Bush

• Ross H. Perot ran as an “independent” in the election• By 1995, Ross H. Perot founded what is known as the

Reform Party

• Perot received 19 percent of the popular vote in the 1992 presidential election

Page 18: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

18Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Affecting the Popular Vote: 1992 Presidential Election (continued)

• Perot ran on issues like cutting the national budget and reducing the national debt• His policies were focused on fiscal issues

• Since Perot’s ideology appealed more closely to that of some Republicans, he likely took votes away from incumbent George H.W Bush• This could have contributed to Bill Clinton’s

victory in 1992

Page 19: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

19Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Affecting the Popular Vote: 2000 Presidential Election• Ralph Nader was the Green Party candidate who ran

against Republican candidate George W. Bush and Democratic candidate Al Gore

• Ralph Nader’s Green Party was focused on environmental issues and appealed to voters who would most likely be voting Democratic

• Although Ralph Nader received a small portion of the popular vote, 3 percent, political scientists argued that it was enough to cost Al Gore the presidency due to the election’s narrow margin

Page 20: Effects of Third Parties in the US Political Science I

20Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 

Resources

• Edwards, George, Martin Wattenberg, and Robert Lineberry. Government in America: People, Politics and Policy. 15. New York City: Longman, 2011. Chapter 17 & 21. Print.

• Harrison, Brigid, and Jean Harris. American Democracy Now. 2. New York City: McGraw-Hill Company, 2011. Chapter 15 & 18. Print.

• O'Conner, Karen, Larry Sabato, and Alixandra Yanus. American Government: Roots and Reform. 2011. New York City: Longman, 2011. Chapter 4 & 18. Print.

• Patterson, Thomas. The American Democracy. 9th. New York City: McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2009. Ch. 15 & 18. Print.

• Schmidt, Steffan, Mack Shelley, Barbara Bardes, and Lynne Ford. American Government and Politics Today. 2011-2012. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2012. Chapter 17 &19. Print.