eg102-2.pdf

64
No. 102 - (Vol. VI) Part 2 MAY 1992 NAMES AND NUMBERS The question how many composers are represented in EG's pages is easily asked but less easily answered. For example, are Komai and Comay two composers or one? Some account of EG's spelling of names, possible because one person has been responsible for a quarter of a century (a situation which may never recur) may therefore be useful. The princi- ple we consciously tried to follow is to repeat the native spelling where possible, and otherwise to approxi- mate in educated English to the pro- nunciation while bearing in mind both traditional spellings and the presence of a majority of non- English readers of EG. We have lear- ned 'on the job' and have tried to be consistent. Of course we failed. Alp- habets, syllable stress patterns (including their absence), pseudo- similarities, strange diacritics, and linguistic ignorance have all contri- buted to our failure. A challenge which thankfully I never encounte- red was the spelling of the name of a Chinese composer, because up to now there have been none. My suc- cessors will, I hope, have to sort that out! Comay (preferred) = Komai, Komay Costeff (preferred) = Kosteff Galushko = Goloshko, etc. (Volgo- grad composer) Garayazli supersedes earlier varia- tions Janosi (now preferred) = Ianosi Joitsa = Joita Kondratev (preferred) = Kondra- tiev, Kondratyev Olympiev = Olimpiev Kozirev = Kozyrev Pogosyants (preferred) = Pogos- jants Senkus is correct (Syankus, Sekus occur in other sources) MISCELLANY Genrikh Kasparyan is the father of Sergei Kasparyan. Likewise there are father and son Manyakhin. The several Kuznetsov's and Ivanov/ Iwanow's must be kept apart. There is a second contemporary Polish composer named Andrzej Lewan- dowski in addition to the well known master from Torun. Gul(y)a(y)ev and Grin are one and the same. Afek was Kopelovich. Carvajal Aliaga (EG36.2040) is the Carvajal of EG89.6586, while for similar Hispa- nic reasons Javier Rodriguez is J.R.Ibran. Benko and Benko are interchangeable, but Benno is not. Belyavsky and Gurgenidze the soviet composers are not the soviet otb IGMs. There are (or have been) seve- ral Kovalenko's, two Vlasenko's and Novikov's, while the New Zealander Emil Melnichenko must not be con- fused with soviet namesakes. Gher- man Umnov is not the late Evgeny Umnov, while EG89.6580 is by a third Umnov. Quite apart from the foregoing are 937

Upload: jazzfusionman

Post on 07-Nov-2014

173 views

Category:

Documents


13 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: eg102-2.pdf

No. 102 - (Vol. VI)Part 2

MAY 1992

NAMES AND NUMBERS

The question how many composersare represented in EG's pages iseasily asked but less easily answered.For example, are Komai and Comaytwo composers or one? Someaccount of EG's spelling of names,possible because one person has beenresponsible for a quarter of a century(a situation which may never recur)may therefore be useful. The princi-ple we consciously tried to follow isto repeat the native spelling wherepossible, and otherwise to approxi-mate in educated English to the pro-nunciation while bearing in mindboth traditional spellings and thepresence of a majority of non-English readers of EG. We have lear-ned 'on the job' and have tried to beconsistent. Of course we failed. Alp-habets, syllable stress patterns(including their absence), pseudo-similarities, strange diacritics, andlinguistic ignorance have all contri-buted to our failure. A challengewhich thankfully I never encounte-red was the spelling of the name of aChinese composer, because up tonow there have been none. My suc-cessors will, I hope, have to sort thatout!

Comay (preferred) = Komai,KomayCosteff (preferred) = KosteffGalushko = Goloshko, etc. (Volgo-grad composer)Garayazli supersedes earlier varia-tions

Janosi (now preferred) = IanosiJoitsa = JoitaKondratev (preferred) = Kondra-tiev, KondratyevOlympiev = OlimpievKozirev = KozyrevPogosyants (preferred) = Pogos-jantsSenkus is correct (Syankus, Sekusoccur in other sources)

MISCELLANY

Genrikh Kasparyan is the father ofSergei Kasparyan. Likewise there arefather and son Manyakhin. Theseveral Kuznetsov's and Ivanov/Iwanow's must be kept apart. Thereis a second contemporary Polishcomposer named Andrzej Lewan-dowski in addition to the well knownmaster from Torun. Gul(y)a(y)evand Grin are one and the same. Afekwas Kopelovich. Carvajal Aliaga(EG36.2040) is the Carvajal ofEG89.6586, while for similar Hispa-nic reasons Javier Rodriguez isJ.R.Ibran. Benko and Benko areinterchangeable, but Benno is not.Belyavsky and Gurgenidze the sovietcomposers are not the soviet otbIGMs. There are (or have been) seve-ral Kovalenko's, two Vlasenko's andNovikov's, while the New ZealanderEmil Melnichenko must not be con-fused with soviet namesakes. Gher-man Umnov is not the late EvgenyUmnov, while EG89.6580 is by athird Umnov.Quite apart from the foregoing are

937

Page 2: eg102-2.pdf

typos, that is, typographical orproof-correcting errors. On balancethe spelling in a solution is morereliable than that above a diagram.For example 'Blinka' (EG96.7279),'Plinka' (EG94 p452) and 'Mlinka'(EG92.6822) are all to be interpretedas Hlinka. These may be 'obvious'corrections, at least to regular rea-ders, but human history and com-mon experience attest that theobvious is often wrong.

Magazines may also confuse. FromSlovakia come PAT A MAT (Brati-slava) and MAT-PAT (Martin), bothof them composition magazines. Itdoes not help that the former's dis-tinguishing motif comprises a 5-let-ter monogram, namely a verticalMAT crossing a horizontal PAT. Ifpossible, one looks to see how amagazine refers to itself.

TWO RUSSIAN ENIGMASWhy did the Russians apparentlynever use their own alphabet todenote the chessboard files? Theirvery first chess books (by Ivan Butri-mov in 1821 and Alexander Petrov in1824) adopted the western a-h sys-tem. This is surely all the odder,given that the Russian alphabet hasno letter 'h' - whence Gitler, Gerb-stman, Giskot for Hitler, Herbstmanand Heathcote. Subsequently theusage was adopted by the first chessmagazine Shakhmatny listok (editedby Viktor Mikhailov from 1859 to1863, and by Mikhail Chigori n from1876 to 1891) and it has never wave-red. The chess historian Dr IsaacLinder of Moscow (in a letter of16iv90) has kindly traced the fore-going basic facts. So we know someof the who, what, where and when.We still want to know why! There iseven the question of the extent towhich the Russian alphabet was ever

used in print or in the hand recordingof positions and game scores. Thepractice is a great convenience forwesterners, but western ease of use isnot likely to have been the reason forits adoption! One reasonable possi-bility is that the impetus was techno-logical rather than caissic, a conse-quence, maybe, of the import ofready-made chess diagram printingtechniques from, say, Germany - onethinks of the very old tradition ofletters along the bottom and top ofthe board and numbers down thesides.Russian took over 'mittelspieF fromGerman, but 'debyut' from French.Now 'etyud' is French, and again wewant to know why - as well as thebasic facts.As one starting-point there is theremarkable fact that the Russian dic-tionary Dal' of the year 1902 includesthe chess meaning of'etyud', while even the largest wes-tern dictionaries we have consultedstill do not today. Dr Linder helpswith facts relating to the first Rus-sians who can be called study com-posers: A.Petrov, Karl A.Jaenischand Ilya Shuwmov. Decouvertes sur lecavalier (Jaenisch) appeared inFrench in St Petersburg in 1837, andthe same author published studies inhis chess column in Sankt Peter-burgskie vedemosti in 1856. Shumovcomposed studies in the 1860's, someof them published in La Strategie inFrance. It has yet to be shown, howe-ver, that the word etyud was appliedunambiguously in any of these ins-tances.Preliminary research has taken usjust this far. Clearly here is just thesubject for a thesis by some diligentresearcher with linguistic skills andthe funds to commute between theDutch Royal Library in the Hagueand the two major libraries of theUSSR (the Lenin Library in Moscowand the Saltykov-Schedrin Libraryin St. Petersburg). We are serious.

938

Page 3: eg102-2.pdf

ERRATA: a postscript toEG702./(pp933-935)EG 32.1851 composer is V.N.DolgovEG 93: the article by Arkady Khait(pp437-440)KH1 alc7 1036.11 c4c5a4g3.g43/5-=.KH10 bPe3 (not bPe2)KH12 2.bSd6KH15h8a6 3012 f5h5a2c8 4/2 = .KH201.cSe2+.KH21 G.A.Nadareishvilic6a8 3002 f4a6d6 3/2=.l.Sc7 + Ka7 2.cSb5 + /i Ka6 3.Sc7 +Ka5 4.Sb7 + Ka4 5.Sc5+ Ka36.Sb5 + Ka2 7.Sc3 + Kal 8.S5a4(Sb3 + ? Kb2;) Qe5 9.Kb6 Qd6 +10.Kb5 draw.i) 2.dSb5 + ? Kb8 3.Sa6 + Kc84.Sd6 + Kd8wins.KH29 hlal 0016.21 h2c2f3.b6g5b34/4+.KH30 5.fSd6.

EG 102.1 The GBR class 0116 end-game' (pp865-866)

1. The essential indication (of a com-puter source) *C* was omitted.2. Lewis B.Stiller, a 25-year-old gra-duate of Johns Hopkins University,Baltimore, was greatly assisted byNoam Elkies of the Department ofMathematics, Harvard University.Our apologies to both gentlemen forthis omission. The CM-2 Connec-tion Machine was located at LosAlamos and used remotely. Stillerand Elkies have not yet actually metface-to-face! [Thinking MachinesCorporation have recently announ-ced a CM-5!!]3. A short article in the November1991 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN hasled to spin-off newspaper publicityincluding a front-page item in theLonden TIMES (30x91) headed 'Atlast - white to win in 100 billionmoves'.

EG102.1p859 The Troitzky 3rd Prize diagram(d6/gl) should have wPe5 (notwPe6), and the applicable solutionsays 'second', despite being printedas third on the page.p874 col.l read: The book is inEnglish so the content is more acces-sible than the Russian ' A-Z' reviewedabove, though whether the volume ismore accessible is an interestingquestion: the Russian edition sizecontrasts with the few hundred of theDutch.p935 col.2 (top) read: EG97.9394 ....W also wins if dark wB can be exc-hanged with check, allowing g2-g3,when wK marches to h6 to win easily.

SNIPPETS1. A posthumous paper by Selmanon reciprocal stalemate has been edi-ted by Jan van Reek and published(in English) in the ARVES series.2. A long and wonderful collectionof Jan Marwitz' studies has appea-red in the ARVES series. They aredeeply commented and annotated bythe composer himself. In Dutch.3. Jan van Reek's comprehensiveHistory of Study Composition in theNetherlands has been completed,sponsors have been found, andpublication is imminent. This is inEnglish.

939

Page 4: eg102-2.pdf

4. The composer of EG 97.7391 is asenior Argentinian otb master.5. *C* Ken Thompson's BELLE (acomplex amalgam of computerhardware and software) succesfullysolved 9 out of 10 studies in the EG 63article (1981).6. For the record. Volume I of EG(EG 1-16) consisted of 524 pages.Volume VI (EG 83-102) has nearly athousand.7. A consolidated index to EG 1-102is not ruled out, but it is not a com-mitment, least of all by AJR.8. For the record, Volume I of EG (ie,EG1-16) consisted of 524 pages.Volume VI (EG83-102.2) has nearly athousand.9. A book 'A to Z of Studies' iscontracted for publication. As thepublisher is Maxwell Macmillan, wemust keep our fingers crossed.Author/compiler: AJR.10. EG 103 and EG 104 should bewith subscribers before EG 102.2.Most awards were prepared by AJR,diagrams prepared by Bas de Heer,and everything else done by Stakha-novite (if one may still use the wordas a comp. lent) stand-in editor Janvan Reek. Full steam ahead!11. Theo van Spijk. EG's printersince EG 3, had af four-fold heartbypass operation in Aug. '91, aftertwo heart attacks while on holidaywith his family in Spain. Aged 58,Theo is recovering well. Our sym-pathy and support reach out to him,to his wife Diny and his son Pascal.12. *C* All of Henri Rinck's claimsto have discovered new draws(not based on the Lolli position) inthe GBR class 1060 are erroneous.(See '1414' passim.)13. Judged by Gh.Umnov, the 10thindividual championship of 'Russia'(ie, the Russian Federation, orRSFSR) was won by A.Maksimovs-kikh with 38 points ahead of V.Kozi-rev, also 38. Next in order: Kopnin,Anufriev, Gromov, Rumyantsev,

Makletsov, Arestov, Osintsev, Rya-binin, Malyshev, Migunov, Seliva-nov and Sidorov. These placings inthe last-ever such soviet champion-ship are 'final'.14. Shakhmatny Bulletin is nowreplaced by Ekspress-Shakhmaty;Ceskoslovensky Sach has breathedits last, no doubt to be replaced.15. Computer specialist AlekseySochniev is now working in SouthAfrica, probably temporarily.16. The British Chess FederationYear Book 1991-92 (in general a uni-que mine of facts about the contem-porary British chess scene) reportson the 1990 Benidorm PCCC andWCSC meeting, but re-locates thewhole event to Basildon (a smalltown in the county of Essex)!!! In1992 Britain is supposed to knowabout Europe!

XXXIV PCCC Meeting (WCSC,etc.) Rotterdam 3-10.8 '91.- studies-related report -1. New holder of title of FIDE judge:Vladimir Kos (Czechoslovakia).2. A new applicant for the title ofFIDE judge must now submit sixawards, two made outside his home-land.3. Studies Sub-Committee3.1 Study EG92.6858 was chosen (by the abovesub-committee using a system of

940

Page 5: eg102-2.pdf

votes) as 'study of the year' for 1986,just as one of its composers, Maksi-movskikh (the other was Dolgov),won the soviet championship - as ithappens, the very last one! At thePCCC banquet the soviet solvingteam expressed shock at this award,alleging the study to be known to beunsound. [Comment: not only hadnobody told us , but the Georgiansclearly were unaware likewise. Typi-cal poor communication, which wemust work in this new world of theCommonwealth of IndependentStates to improve!] The study (1st Pr,Troitzky '120' MT) is not included inthe recent book selecting Maksi-movskikh's best studies.

a7al0440.12g2h6fla4.f6d6h7 4/5 + . I.f7 Rf62.Bc4 Bb5 (else Ra2 +) 3.Bb3/i Bd3/ii 4.Rg8 Bc2 5.Be6 Bf5 6.Rgl + Bbl(Kb2; Rfl) 7.Kb6/iii Kb2 8.Rg8 Bf59.Rg2 + /iv Bc2 10.Kc7 Kc3 ll.Rg8Bf5 12.Rg3 + Bd3 13.Kxd6 wins, i)3.Rgl + ? Kb2 4.Rfl Rxf7 + draws,ii) For Bg6. If d5 4.Bxd5 Bc65.Ra2 + and 6.Ra6. hi) See (iv). Asregards the alleged flaw, ColinCrouch (at the i92 CESC) proposed7.Bc4, threatening 8.Rfl, when d58.Bxd5, seems forced and the gran-diose artistic intention may well beno more than a mirage. But weremain unsure, iv) With wKb7, nowKc3 10.Rf2? Be4+. With wKb8,now Kc3 10.Rf2 Bxe6 ll.Rxf6 Bxf712.Rxf7d5, drawing.3.2 A procedure for voting for astudy for the year 1988 waw agreed.3.3 A set of guidelines for organisingformal international study tourneyswas adopted as a discussion docu-ment.4. Among the mini-lectures deliveredto an ARVES get-together held in acaf some distance from the InntelHotel (PCCC venue), and attendedby nearly 50 enthusiasts, IGM John

Nunn demonstrated how he hasextracted studies from 5-man data-bases (using a ChessBase interface).The very interesting questions are:who/what has composed them, howought they to be described, and howshould judges treat them if enteredfor a tourney (this is happening!)?5. The Match: USSR vs. Rot W stillhangs fire. The Moscow and Tbilisijudges have so far failed to submittheir ranking lists while the Londonjudges (Nunn and Roycroft) did so inJune 1991.6. WCSC. After the studies solvinground was complete it was foundthat all three studies were defective.The round was then cancelled andthe championship (convincingly wonby the USSR) decided on problem-solving alone.7. The FIDE Album 1983-85 shouldbe out 'any day now'. Just like EG.8. No one from ARVES was presentat Rotterdam to accept EG subscrip-tions for 1992, etc. We trust that thispublic relations disaster will not berepeated at any future PCCC mee-ting.9. The XXXV PCCC meeting will beheld in Bonn (Germany)22-29VIII92.

Roll of Honour

+ Norman LITTLEWOODEngeland 311 33-29v89 The versatilecomposer member of the Littlewoodchess clan, but also a formidablechallenger for the British Cham-pionship.+ Gia Anton NADAREISHVILIGeorgia 221X21-3x91. At least he hasbeen spared the sight of his landbeing torn apart.

941

Page 6: eg102-2.pdf

+ Gregor GRZEBAN (Bagdasarian)Poland 28 VIII02-21x91. Veteran ofPiran 1958 4- Osmo Ilmari KAILAFinland llvl6-3 VII91 + AlekseyGrigorevich KOPNIN Russia 17 XII18-17 VI 91 A remarkably prolific,tenacious and inventive sovietcomposer-analyst living in highlypolluted Chelyabinsk, Kopnin willbe sorely missed.EG's pages have seen many of hisstudies, and four significant articles.See EG 58 on Alternating Blockade;EG 70 on GBR class 0107; EG 74 onGBR class 0134; and EG 88 on GBRclass 0310.01.

OK: 22i92 AJRQN vs RR max win in 153 (per Elkiesxi91)

*C* GBR class 1601 - the longest win.

Another 6-man endgame, withclaims to being the strangest yet. Atseveral points both attacker anddefender indulge in what looks liketempo-play! This output is due yetagain to Lewis Stiller and NoamElkies working on aThe Connection Machine.

c6cl 1601 h2a6f4h7 3/3 WTM (incheck).

LKc6-d5 Ra6-a5+ 2.Kd5-e6 Rf4-e4+ 3.Ke6-f7 Ra5-a7+ 4.Kf7-g6Ra7-a6 + 5.Kg6-f5 Re4-c4 6.Qh2-gl + (Qh2-hl + ) Kcl-b2 (Kcl-c2)7.Qgl-f2 + (Qgl-g2 + ) Kb2-a3 (Kb2-b3) 8.Qf2-f3+ Ka3-b4 (Ka3-a4)9.Qf3-b7 + Kb4-a5 10.Qb7-d5 +Ka5-b4

ll.Qd5-d2 + Kb4-b5 12.Qd2-b2 +Rc4-b4 13.Qb2-e5 + Kb5-a4 14.Qe5-e8 + Ka4-a3 15.Qe8-e7 Ra6-a5 +16.Kf5-g6 (Kf5-f6) Ra5-a6 +17.Kg6-g7 Ka3-b3 18.Sh7-f8 Rb4-b619.Sf8-d7 Rb6-g6 + 2O.Kg7-f7 Rg6-h6

21.Qe7-e3 + Kb3-c2 22.Qe3-c5 +(Qe3-e4 + ) Kc2-b3 23.Qc5-d4 Kb3-c2 24.Kf7-e8 Ra6-e6 + 25.Ke8-d8Re6-d6 26.Qd4-e3 Rh6-g6 27.Kd8-c7(Kd8-c8 Qe3-f2 + Qe3-e4 + ) Rd6-c6 + 28.Kc7-b7 Rc6-e6 29.Qe3-f2 +Kc2-c3 30.Kb7-b8 (Qf2-f4) Rg6-h6

31.Qf2-f4 Kc3-c2 32.Qf4-c4+ Kc2-d2 33.Sd7-c5 Re6-b6+ 34.Kb8-a7Rb6-g6 35.Qc4-d3+ (Qc4-d4 + )Kd2-cl 36.Qd3-c3 + Kcl-dl 37.Ka7-b8 (Ka7-a8) Rg6-b6 + 38.Kb8-a8Rb6-g6 39.Qc3-b2 Rg6-f6 4O.Qb2-d4+ (Qb2-b3+ Qb2-bl + ) Kdl-e2(Kdl-c2)

41. Qd4-d3 + Ke2-el 42. Qd2-e3 +Kel-dl 43.Sc5-d7 Rf6-e6 44.Qe3-f2Re6-e8 + (Re6-c6 Rh6-h8 4-) 45.Ka8-b7 (Ka8-a7) Re8-e6 46.Kb7-b8 Re6-e8+ (Rh6-h8 + ) 47.Kb8-c7 Re8-e648.Qf2-g2 Re6-g6 49.Qg2-b2 Rg6-a650.Kc7-b8 (Kc7-c8) Ra6-g6

51.Kb8-b7 Kdl-el 52.Kb7-c8 Rg6-g8+ 53.Kc8-c7 Rg8-g6 54.Kc7-d8Rg6-a6 55.Qb2-c2 Ra6-d6 56.Qc2-cl+ Kel-e2 57.Qcl-f4 Ke2-dl58.Kd8-e8 Rd6-e6+ 59.Ke8-f8 Kdl-c2 60.Qf4-b4Rh6-h8 +

61.Kf8-g7 Rh8-h6 62.Sd7-e5 Re6-f663.Kg7-g8 Rf6-d6 64.Se5-g4 Rh6-g6+ 65.Kg8-f7 Kc2-cl 66.Qb4-b3Rd6-b6 67.Qb3-c3 + Kcl-bl 68.Sg4-e5 Rg6-h6 69.Qc3-el+ Kbl-a27O.Qel-f2+ Ka2-b3 (Ka2-bl Ka2-al)

71.Qf2-f3+ Kb3-a2 (Kb3-b4)72.Qf3-g2+ Ka2-b3 73.Qg2-d5 +Kb3-b4 74.Qd5-d4+ Kb4-b575.Qd4-c4+ Kb5-a5 76.Qc4-a2 +

942

Page 7: eg102-2.pdf

(Qc4-c3 +) Ka5-b5 77.Qa2-b3 +(Qa2-e2 + ) Kb5-a6 78.Qb3-a4 +Ka6-b7 79.Se5-d7 Rb6-c6 8O.Qa4-d4Kb7-c7

81.Sd7-c5 Rc6-g6 82.Qd4-d5 Kc7-b683.Qd5-c4Rg6-f6 + 84.Kf7-e8 Rf6-d6 85.Ke8-e7 Rd6-g6 86.Sc5-d7 +Kb6-a5 87.Qc4-a2 + Ka5-b488.Qa2-b2 + Kb4-a4 89.Sd7-c5 +Ka4-a5 9O.Qb2-e5 Ka5-b4

91.Sc5-d3 + Kb4-c4 92.Qe5-e4 +Kc4-b3 93 .Qe4-b4 + Kb3-c294.Qb4-c4 + Kc2-d2 95.Sd3-e5Rg6-a6 96.Qc4-c5 Rh6-e6 + 97.Ke7-f7Kd2-e2 98.Qc5-c4 + Ke2-e3 99.Qc4-h4 (Qc4-b4) Re6-f6 + 100.Kf7-g8Rf6-e6

101. Qh4-b4 Ra6-a8 + (Re6-e8 +)102.Kg8-f7 Ra8-e8 103.Qb4-c3 +Ke3-f2(Ke3-e2)104.Qc3-d2 + (Qc3-c2 + ) Kf2-fl 105.Qd2-dl + Kfl-f2106.Se5-g4 + Kf2-g2 107.Qdl-c2 +(Qdl-e2 + Qdl-d5 + Sg4-f6) Kg2-f3108.Sg4-f6Re8-e7 + 109.Kf7-g6Re6-e5 110.Qc2-d3 + Kf3-g2

Hl.Sf6-d5Re7-e6 + 112.Kg6-f7 Re6-e8 113.Sd5-f4+ Kg2-f2 114.Sf4-h3 +(Kf7-g6) Kf2-el 115.Sh3-g5 Re5-e2116.Qd3-c4 (Qd3-c3 + ) Re2-e3 (Re8-e3) 117.Qc4-d4 Kel-e2 118.Kf7-g7Re3-g3 119.Qd4-b2+ (Qd4-c4 + )Ke2-ell20.Qb2-b4 + Kel-f2

121.Kg7-f6 Rg3-d3 122.Sg5-e4 +Kf2-f3 123.Se4-d6 Re8-f8 + 124.Sd6-f7 Rd3-d8 125.Kf6-g5 Rf8-g8 +126.Kg5-h4 Rd8-a8 127.Qb4-d2(Qb4-el)Kf3-e4128.Sf7-g5+ Ke4-e5129.Qd2-e3+ (Qd2-c3 + ) Ke5-d513O.Qe3-d3 + Kd5-c5

131.Sg5-e4+ Kc5-b4 132.Qd3-c3 +Kb4-a4 133.Qc3-b2 Rg8-h8 +134.Kh4-g4 Ra8-b8 135.Se4-c3 +Ka4-a5 136.Qb2-a3 + Ka5-b6137.Sc3-d5+ Kb6-c6 138.Sd5-e7-fKc6-b7 (Kc6-b5 Kc6-b6) 139.Qa4-

b4+ Kb7-a6140.Qb4-a4+ Ka6-b6

141.Qa4-c4 Rh8-f8 (Rh8-d8)142.Qc4-c6+ Kb6-a7 (Kb6-a5)143.Qc6-c5+ Ka7-a6 144.Se7-d5Rf8-g8+ 145.Kg4-f5Rb8-f8+ (Rg8-f8 + ) 146.Kf5-e4 Rf8-b8 147.Qc5-a3+ Ka6-b7(Ka6-b5)148.Qa3-b4 +(Qa3-b3 +) Kb7-c6 (Kb7-a6)149.Qb4-c4+ Kc6-b7 15O.Qc4-b5 +Kb7-c8

151.Qb5-c6+ (Qb5-a6+ Qb5-c5 +Sd5-e7 + ) Kc8-d8 152.Qc6-c7 +(Qc6-d6 + ) Kd8-e8 153.Qe7 mate(Qxc8 + ). The accepted 'conversionmetric' algorithm allocates no prio-rity between a checkmating moveand a winning capture move wheneach is equi-optimal. If there is aforced mate in 3 but a forced win-ning capture in 2, the latter is prefer-red unless the alternative 'metric',the 'checkmate metric', is followed.Computers handle either metric,while human specialists prefer theconversion metric until they sensemate. In (won) endings against thelone king there is by definition no'conversion'. It surprises many peo-ple when they realise the logical con-sequence that chessplayers and com-puter programmers will never agreeon a generally applicable definitionof 'best move'.

TOURNEY ANNOUNCEMENTWouter MEES Jubilee Theme Tour-ney -formal and international

Entries to the director:Rene OlthofAchter het Schaapshoofd 7,5211 MC 's-HertogenboschNetherlands

Closing dat: 1VII92Judge: W.J.G.Mees, celebrating his70th birthdayTheme: The en passant capture in a

943

Page 8: eg102-2.pdf

study to win or draw. W makes criti-cal use of the rule of loss of the rightto capture if not exercised immedia-tely. In the try wP plays two squaresand the refutation is by en passantcapture. In the solution the en pas-sant capture is legal but fails.

Example No.l - thematic : PaulKeres, 1943 (end of a study)d2c4 0000.21 .e2f2f4 3/2+...., 6. e4/i Kd4 (fe Kxe3) 7. f3 Kc48.Ke2 Kd4 9.Kf2 Ke5 lO.Kfl, andKd4 ll.Kg2 Ke5 12.Kh3 Kf6 13.Kg4Ke5 14.Kg5, or Ke6 ll.Ke2 Kd612.Kd3 Kc5 13.Kc3, winning.i)6.f3?Kd4 7.e4fe drawn.

Example No.2 - thematicF.Simkhovich, H.M. SchweizerischeSchachzeitung, 1923hlh8 0011.68 h4 gl .b4 c3 d4 f4 g3 h2b3b5c4d5e7f5f6g4 9/9=.l.Bxf6+ ef 2.h4/i b2/ii 3.Kg2/iiiblQ 4.Kf2 Qb2 + 5.Se2 Qal 6.Ke3Qel 7.h5 Kh7 8.h6 Kxh6 stalemate.\)THE THEMATIC TRY! 2.Kg2?b23. Kf2 blQ 4. Se2 Qhl 5. Ke3 Qel6. h4 gh andBl wins! 2. h3? b2, for3...gh, winning.ii) gh 3.Sf3 and 4.Sd2 - and W wins,an acceptable thematic result.iii)3.Se2?blQ + and 4...Qel.

Example No.3 - non-thematic :W.J.G.Mees (schema)ala8 0010.31 gl.a5a6f2.e4 5/2 + .I.f4? ef draw, but I.a7 Kb7 2.a6 +Kxa7 3.f4+ Kxa6 4.f5 wins.This is a counter-exemple. The enpassant capture does not occur (isnot al legal move) in the main line.Example No. 3 is therfor unthematicand unacceptable for the tourney.

TOURNEY ANNOUNCEMENT10th Theme Tourney of DIA-GRAMMESEntries to director:

Louis Azemard5 res. R. Rollandrue FanourisF-13110 Port-de-BoucFrance

Judge: Alexander Hildebrand (Swe-den)Closing dat: 301V92Theme: "W minimal draw - wK +one other W man. Bl force unrestric-ted".

Tourney Announcements

1.Polish Chess Federation:GRZEBAN Memorial TourneyWladyslaw ROSOLAKSadowa 18/20 m. 4791-465 LODZPolandby:31x922.MITROFANOV-60 JT'Sport-Chelovek-Vremya'Fontanka59, ap.549,191023 ST. PETERSBURGRussia[Jury]: chief judge: IGM Yuri Aver-bakhjudges: L.A.Mitrofanov andV.I.Fyodorovsend: 2 copies - with a MOTTOdirector: V.I.Tolstovby: Iv92The award to be published on thecomposer's 60th birthday(2VII92,anoptimistic schedule)Mitrofanov gloriously wears themantle of Korolkov, of the city ofTroitzkyandKubbel.Sponsored by 'LPS Centre Limited*3.OSMO KAILA MTErkki PUHAKKA

944

Page 9: eg102-2.pdf

Miniatontie 1 B 1402360 ESPOOSuomi/Finlandtheme: two stipulations with nochange to the position. The two sti-pulations to be chosen from direct-mate, direct stalemate, helpmate,self mate, or a study,judge: P.Perkonojaby: 3VI924.Enrico PAOLI JT (80th birthday)Viale Piave 2542100 REGGIO EMILIAItalyby: 30IX 925.informal 1991-92PAT-A-MATPeter GVOZDJAKSilvanska 27841 04 BRATISLAVACzechoslovakiajudge: V.Neidze (Georgia)Other tourneys with closing dateslong past, but awards eagerly awai-ted (keeping our fingers crossed):6. AITMATOV-60 c.lv88 (EG 93p448)7. SERETIN DENZEN-60 c.lvi89(EG 94 p456)8. Alexander Hildebrand JT(Springren, Sweden) c.31X11 88

Roland LECOMTE's article received31VIII 91The following article (here transla-ted, condensed and edited by AJR)was prepared by the well knownjournalist Monsieur RolandLecomte expressly in connectionwith the Lyon World Championshipstage held in Lyon in 1990. It has notpreviously been published.

HENRI RINCK(1870-1952)

Chemical engineer, prodigious chessartist, record holder, and distinguis-hed son of Lyon

The supreme and inimitable work ofHenri Rinck, born 120 years ago inLyon, occupies an immense space inthe world of chess: no less than half acentury of research into opposingchess force scarcely studied previou-sly, of composition, of verificationwith meticulous care, ever faithful tohis motto 'with willpower, patienceand perseverance'. His 190 tourneyhonours include 60 first prizes car-ried off in 102 international competi-tions. Nicknamed 'the Victor Hugoof chess' for the fecundity and qua-lity of his artistic endgame studies,his life and work are hardly separa-ble.

The man. Henri Rinck was born inLyon 10il871 at the erstwhile Rinckbreweries located at the Cours duMidi (later Cours Verdun) of Frenchparents and a grandfather fromAlsace. Educated first as a pupil atthe Lyon lyce, and then at the Techni-sche Hochschule ('cole Polytechni-que') of Munich in Bavaria where heleft with a diploma in chemistry, heentered the Lyon Faculty of Sciencewhere he spent two years as assistantto Professor Philippe Barbier in thechemistry laboratory. Thereafter hecontributed much to the prestige andimage of the tablissements Rinck inthe heart and capital of the departe-mentoi Rohne.

In 1897 in the course of specialistwork on chlorophyll Rinck inventeda process for the purification ofgreen vegetable oil. He introducedthe process first into several plants inMarseille, and subsequently into alarge number of refineries for grig-non

945

Page 10: eg102-2.pdf

and olive oil in Barcelona (Spain),where he moved in 1900, and wherehe stayed for the rest of his life.

Rinck's physiognomy expressedcalm energy and goodwill. His gazewas both frank and distant, that of aman of action who is at the sametime thinker and sensitive poet.From this presence (in both literaland figurative senses) a feeling emer-ged which compelled sympathy andrespect. He died at Badalona (Spain)on 1811 1952, aged 82, after a shortbut painful illness.

The passion. From the age of 16Rinck experienced an irresistible lea-ning towards chess, an inclinationand a passion which he was fortu-nate to be able to combine with hisprofessional career.

Already champion of the town ofLyon he played, and won prizes, incorrespondence tourneys organisedby the monthly chess magazine 'LaStratgie'. He also won a two-gamematch against the Algiers chess club,the players of the latter combining inconsultation. At 20 his analyses ofthe Muzio and Kieseritzky Gambits,and the French Defence, were publis-hed in 'La Stratgie'. Games played atthis time show Rinck's mastery.

Only later, in Spain, through contactwith his 'brother in arms' Jos Tolosay Carrera and with the great problemcomposer Valentin Marin (theybecame inseparable friends) didRinck enter the realm of chess com-position - with two-move problems.

The records. Rinck carried 190major honours in 102 competitions.Rinck was always a striver, nevercontent. He swept the board at Malm(Sweden) 1924 with the first threeprizes and first three honourablementions. And he did exactly the

same the following year, despite allopposition. At Florence in 1925Rinck took six prizes in another tour-ney. Enough to put the fear of Godinto other competitors!

The artist. Rinck's first studies datefrom 1902. In 1907 his '150 Fins dePartie' was published (there werethree editions). In 1919 '300 Fins dePartie', and in 1927 '700 Fins de Par-tie'.

In the space of 20 years Rinck hadscaled the peaks of his chosen art.His style was unmatched, characteri-sed above all by its form, which dis-plays absolute beauty and purity. Bythis time his name is celebrated in allthe countries of the world. 'Les sur-prises de la thorie' appeared in 1947in Madrid (in French and Spanish),bringing together 111 endings (and afurther dozen) dedicated to his nep-hew Jacques Rinck, printed in redand black.

The ultimate demanding task, one atwhich he laboured to his last breath,resulted in final victory (among somany others) over death, when hehad the joy, six days before his depar-ture from this world, to hold in hishands the first copy of '1414 Fins dePartie'. In accordance with hiswishes the volume accompanied himto his grave. The original edition,published at its author's expense,was made in an edition of 500 copieson 10U952 by the 'Tipografia LaAcadmica' at Barcelona for the aut-hor's 82nd birthday. It is a master-piece, from the standpoint of bothform and content. The type was enti-rely set by hand, the labour of aBenedictine monk, simply not possi-ble today due to the exorbitant cost.Monsieur J.Guisle, the former spe-cialist bookseller of 13 rue Saint-Jacques (Paris 5e) took charge ofhalf this edition, which was sold out

946

Page 11: eg102-2.pdf

on the spot. The volume is 15cm x27cm, has 760 pages, 238 of themwith diagrams six to a page (at leastone masterpiece per page), and 530for the solutions. The work 'of awhole lifetime is dedicated to thehouse of Rinck and, in the firstplace, to its primary representative,Monsieur Jacques Rinck of Lyon'.1414 Fins de Partie (together with anappendix of a further 26) are asmany pearls of which each, polishedto the last degree, has the purity andsprakle of a diamond.An imperishable jewel - and magic,because what strikes us when we exa-mine a study by the Lyonnais masteris the improbability of the outcome.

The verdict of his contemporaries.Osip S.Bernstein (an internationalgrandmaster of practical play): 'theartistic study shows that the value ofa position, viewed under the lamp ofgenius, differs from its apparentvalue. No one has systematised stu-dies as Henri Rinck has. What anenormous task it is to systematise

exceptions to rules, some of whichare by their nature intangible! Spirittriumphs over matter, will over fate.'Vitaly Halberstadt (artist, masterand eclectic connoisseur of studycomposition): 'A unique model inthe history of the artistic endgame,Henri Rinck possessed in the highestdegree qualities which it is rare tomeet in one man: genial constructor,penetrating visual acuity, great tena-city, and a remarkable capacity forhard work. His clear methodicalmind gave him the tranquil assu-rance that he had worked well. Rus-sian folk-lore has it that the universeis borne on the backs of three greatwhales. We might say that the trio ofwhales supporting our little universeof the endgame are in chronologicalorder the Germans Kling & Horwitz,the Russian Troitzky, and theFrenchman Henri Rinck'.

Roland LecomteFIDE Judge for Chess CompositionParis, III 90

REVIEWS

REVIEW 'The Comprehension ofBeauty', by A.K. Kalinin, 160 pages,Moscow 1990, in Russian. Chess com-positions by the armed forces, and abook on it, would be unthinkable inany other country, let alone in an editi-on of 50.000. The study composers in-clude Kalinin himself (represented by33 studies and very unlucky in EG'sBent JT), Bondarenko (61, ma-ny jointly composed studies), Evreinov(30), (Kanonik, a problemist, but con-ductor of the newspaper ChervonyGirnik's tourneys for 30 years), (Fokin, also a problemist but also an influen-tial columnist, this time of Vecherny

Leningrad) Ulanov (5), Razumenko(19), Tolstoy (6), Asaba (32), NikolayFilippovich Vlasenko (2), Mazur (8).The figures are numbers, not ages!

REVIEW el arte del ESTUDIO de aje-drez, by Zoilo R. Caputto, Vol. 1, Bu-enos Aires, 1990. In Spanish, 318 pa-ges, with many diagrams and copiousillustrations. The is no price. The copyunder review is one of an edition of 50,numbered and signed. We trust that alarger edition will follow for wideravailability. For a private publicationthis work is of exceptionally high qua-lity, due to intensive and extensive re-

947

Page 12: eg102-2.pdf

search over at least five years by Pro-fessor Caputto who has correspondedfar and wide. Academic thoroughnessis repeatedly in evidence, especially inthe footnotes. There are names andsources which are to be found neitherin Bondarenko's Stanovleniye nor inRoycroft's The Chess Endgame Study.Starting with the origins of chess itselfwe are taken in this first volumethrough the mansuba period, themiddle ages, the Spanish and Portugu-ese contribution, the Italian, then thegreat Italian School, the French andEnglish influence, with 1851 as theKling & Horwitz watershed. The selectionsfrom Stamma (18), del Rio (21), Pon-ziani (9 del Rio's), and Lolli (9) are ad-mirable. The numerous drawings andreproductions bringing together themajor nineteenth century personalitiesenable us to observe that the portraitsmight have be made expressly to inti-midate children! A knowledge of Spa-nish (which we do not have) is needed tofollow the text, but there is much plea-sure and gain even without. An appen-dix displays analyses and studies by aselection of 'the modern champions'.A fascinating inclusion here is a pieceof the score, not of a game, but of asoprano duet, from the opera Tom Jo-

nes by Philidor. The author finally gi-ves a tantalising foretaste of the con-tent of Vols 2 and 3, which will respec-tively cover modern composers andcomposing itself.

REVIEW 'The output of a genius', byV. Kirillov, Riga, 1990, in Russian.The introductory matter, including theP-ending win against Capablanca in asimul in Riga in 1913, is the only signi-ficant addition to what has alreadybeen published in Whitworth's book.The subject is German Mattison. True,Whitworth will envy the edition size of20,000. There are 53 studies, 5 supple-mentary positions, a game, 9 pro-blems, an article by Koblents and Mat-tion's tournament record.

REVIEW 'The Truth-seekers', 128 pa-ges, Kurgan 1991, in Russian, soft co-ver. Half of this book covers IGM Yu.Balashov's career, while the other halfdeals with A. Maksimovskikh. Bothare local heroes and each seems to ha-ve authored his part of the book - asi-de from the inevitable introductions byotb IGMs! The 64 Maksimovskikh stu-dies range from 1963 to 1987, of whichsome 15 won high prizes. There arealso a few problems and photos.

*c* *c* *c* *c* *c* *c* *c* *c* *c* *c* *c* *c*Recent otb experience with

GBR class 0312

1.1 0312 occurred in Karpov vs. Kas-parov at Interpolis, x91, with Karpovhaving the upper hand. The gamewas drawn under the 50-move rule,but Karpov found an effective wayto drive Kasparov's king to the edge -and came close to winning. Kaspa-rov's defensive strategy of keepinghis rook out of harm's way andretreating his king towards the cor-ner not controlled by the bishop is

certainly correct, though his play hasa passive flavour. In fact, we learnfrom Stiller/Elkies, at no point in theplay did Karpov have a win.

g4f6 0312.01 d8c6d3f4.h4 4/3.WTM.

63.Kxh4 Rg8 64.Be4 Rgl 65.Sh5 +Ke666.Sg3 Kf6 67.Kg4 Ral 68.Bd5 Ra569.Bf3Ral70.Kf4Ke671.Sc5 + Kd6 72.Se4+ Ke7 73.Ke5

948

Page 13: eg102-2.pdf

Rfl74.Bg4Rgl75.Be6Rel76.Bc8 Rcl 77.Kd4 Rdl + 78.Sd3Kf7 79.Ke3 Ral 8O.Kf4 Ke781.Sb4 Scl 82.Sd5 + Kf7 83.Bd7Rfl 4- 84.Ke5 Ral 85.Sg5 + Kg686.Sf3 Kg7 87.Bg4 Kg6 88.Sf4 +Kg7 89.Sd4 Rel + 9O.Kf5 Rcl91.Be2 Rel 92.Bh5 Ral 93.fSe6 +Kh6 94.Be8 Ra8 95.Bc6 Ral96.Kf6 Kh7 97.Sg5 + Kh8 98.dSe6Ra6 99.Be8 Ra8 100.Bh5 Ral101. Bg6 Rfl+ 102.Ke7 Ral103.Sf7 + Kg8 104.Sh6 + Kh8105.Sf5Ra7 +106.Kf6 Ral 107.Se3 Rel 108.Sd5 Rgl109.Bf5Rflll0.dSf4Rallll.Sg6+ Kg8112.Se7 + drawn, Kh8(forced, and if 113.Sg5 Ra6 +114.Kf7Rf6 + )..

1.2 There are 52 studies starting withthis material in Rinck's '1414'. Nosolution exceeds 7 moves in length.Mostly they are domination studies.All are meticulously analysed. Thefollowing two show the defendingking in the good defensive corner(which Rinck states to be a generaldraw, as opposed to the other corner,which he deems lost).

1.3 Rinck, Bohemia (Prague), 9x211 [648/'1414']

b6b8 0312 c8h2e5g5 4/2 + .

l.Sd7+ Ka8 2.Se6Rb8+ 3.Ka6Rb74.Sc7 + Rxc7 5.Sb6+ Kb8 6.Sd5Ka8 7.Sxc7 + .

1.4 Rinck, Basel tournament pro-gramme, 8iv28 [649/'1414']c6c8 0312! f3clc4c5 4/2 + .

l.Sd6+ Kb8 2.Sd7+ Ka8 (Ka7;Sb5 + ) 3.Sb5, and bR is squeezed,for example Rg3 4.Sb6+, or Rfl4.Sc7+.

1.5 The only argument for a general

win (we know now that there is nogeneral win) would be if the defen-der's king in the good corner cannevertheless be driven out and forcedinto a bad corner - a process thatmight take 150 moves. There is a pre-cedent with the 5-man endgame twobishops against knight, where theone consensus draw turned out notto be a draw. With six men we are innew territory as regards computerinvestigations.

1.6 *C* GBR class 0312

A max-length win follows. As usualthis totally new result in a 6-manpawnless ending is due to the Stiller/Elkies algorithm executed onThe Connection Machine. Allequioptimals are included.

d3al 0312 a6d8a3e4 4 /2+.

l.Sc4 Re6 2.Sf2 Re8 3.Bg5 Rf8 4.SdlRg8 5.Be7Re86.Bb4 Rb8 7.Ba5 Kbl 8.Sc3+ Kal9.Se4 Kbl 10.Bc7 Rc8ll.Bb6 Ka2 12.Kc3 Rb8 13.Bd4 Rd814.cSd6Rb815.Sc5Rg816.Sc4 Rg4 17.Be5 Rg5 18.Bd6 Rg619.Be7 Rg7 2O.Bh4 Rh7 (Rg4)21.Bel Rhl 22.Bd2 Rdl 23.Bf4 Rfl24.Bc7Rcl+ 25.Kd3Kbl26.Bf4 Rgl (Rhl) 27.Kc3 Rg4 28.Bc7Rg7 29.Ba5 Kcl 3O.Sb2 Kbl (Rg5)31.cSd3 Rg5 (Ra7) 32.Bb4 Rb533.Bd6 Rb6 (Rd5) 34.Bf4 Rf635.Bd2Rf7(Rf8,d6)PT11536.Sc4 Rd7 37.Be3 (Bf4,g5,h6) Re738.Bc5 (Bel) Rc7 39.Ba3 Rc8 40.Kb3(Sb4) Rb8 +41.Sb4 Rd8 42.Sb6 Rf8 (Rg8,h8,d2)43.S6d5 (Sa4) Rf2 44.Sc3 + Kal45.Sc6Rg2(Rh2,c2)PT1246.Sd4 Rd2 47.Bel Rf2 (Rg2,h2)

949

Page 14: eg102-2.pdf

48.Ka3 (dSe2) and 49. wins.

Only 49 moves! FIDE will be relie-ved!

*c* *c* *c* *c* *c* *c**C* More maxi-length win info, on6-man pawnless endings

GBR class 0312 49 movesGBR class 032168GBR class 1601153GBR class 320182GBR class 3210101GBR class 4103 71

All due to the Stiller/Elkies duo exer-cising their powerful algorithm onThe Connection Machine in LosAlamos. We learn that all Zugwangsand WTM/BTM statistics have beenextracted, but details are still lac-king. What interesting times we livein and lie ahead!

*c* *c* *c* *c* *c*1.0 Data bases for all!1.1 In ix.90 the 0410 data base cameon sale from ChessBase, the com-pany based in (West) Germany.Distributed on a single high density(1.2 or 1.4 megabyte) diskette it issimple to install on a personal com-puter ( T C ) . Except that it makes noattempt to win any drawn position itperforms beautifully. The depths of

all moves (1-ply) from the displayedposition can be displayed or concea-led.1.2 Further data bases are promisedfrom ChessBase, but there are severedifficulties preventing the compres-sion of data bases (such as 1033 10601006 0023) where draws are theexception. This is because every wonposition has to have an associateddepth. However, we look forward to0014 and 1600/3200.1.3 Ken Thompson has privatelyindicated his interest in generating6-man pawnless databases 'to con-version' (good!), since he has accessto new hardware.AJR has proposed 0321 and 0332,but Ken always makes up his ownmind.1.4 Any 6-man data base needs to bedistributed using CD-ROM techno-logy. To attach CD-ROM to a PCcosts about £ 500 - at present.In 91 Ken Thompson distributedtwenty-two 5-man endgame databasesto friends, using CD-ROM and a Huff-man coding compression technique.The CD-ROM itself weighs just half anounce! The databases are, in GBRcode sequence: 0004.10 0005 0014 00230104 0400.10 0401 0410 0500 1004 10061033 1060 1303 1330 1400 1600 4000.1040014010 4100 5000.2. Zugzwangs identified by compu-ter.2.1 Erratum. EG93 p433, rightmostcolumn, item 184. Add bSf7, tomake the line read: 184 d7f8 f6f5f72.2 There are 17 true zugzwangs inthe GBR class 0410, identified for usby Lars RASMUSSEN of Tranberg,Denmark, who is the database pro-grammer of ChessBase. At ourrequest Lars has added the BTM Wwin depth. WTM draws only - bydefinition of true zugzwang.

wK wR wB bK bRb8 b7 b5 d8 a5 3b8 g2 b7 hi h3 2

950

Page 15: eg102-2.pdf

Bianchetti, 1925 (EG20.1112)c8 f7 h5 e8 e6 2(Andrew Miller, 1966 EG8.262)c7 e7 d3 a7 f6 45A. Zytogorski, 1843(?) (Cheron I, 414)c7 h7 c4 a7 g6 26c7c7d7c6c6c6d6d6d6d6d5d5

c6e5b5c7e7g7b6fla6g6f7g7

g6e7g5d6d3h6c7nng8e5d4

a7a6a8a8b8f8c8c8d8e8a8d8

h6e8f2b8b4d8a8g7b8h8h5f4

131832834414917214116

3.0 Danger! Programmer at work!You have been warned! We givebelow unadulterated computer-generated data (from Ken Thomp-son, on dates as shown) which issometimes self-explanatory, some-times not. Figures within parent-heses are not, repeat not, to be takenliterally. (Evgeny Gik, prolific jour-nalist in Moscow, are you listening?)Some data is in idiosyncratic octal, andthe heading 'CHESS GAMES' simplyidentifies the computer stationery used 'by Ken Thompson - it has no othersiginificance.3.1 Fig. 1 shows the frequency distri-bution of ultimate depths in 4010.

d0/QB.012345

Q:

012345

8685838614224521352875216912239948266874447

B789101112131415IB1718192021222324252627282930313233

B7101112131415IB1720212223242526273031323334353637

' ! '

878473559446261884344773044381561201235128092860416002242738282871912913036773048593546249319571635139088252029619012814419133

3.2 Fig.2 shows the frequency distri-bution ultimate depths in 4001.

d l /QN.Q:0123456

0123456

88098330101031089751314114382810217483S3397064104

951

Page 16: eg102-2.pdf

7891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041

7101112131415161720212223242526273031323334353637' '

' " '

'$''%''&'1 1 T

' ( '

' ) '

768120847863371513116436663167169106334764325041632073206011382092146301433836432804188016121185683358308295262211119956769533755217

Initial PositionB

I £b6t (22) <£>e8 (22)

*c8(-17)(21)

(0)2 . . . £>f8(21)

#f7(0)iBre3(-17)!Bre6t(-18)3 ^e7t (20) £>g8 (20) 4(19)

4 ^d8t (+2)4. . . <£>h7(19)

4. . . #g7( -12)5 &e4t (18)

(+2)5.. . £>g7(18)

(-11)

(17)

(+2)

g#h6(-16)

(-14) (-14)

e7t (+3)6.

(+4)

3.3 Fig.3 shows annotated ultimateplay in 4010.

Chess GamesNovember 14, 1985

10.

11

12.

7 #e7t (16) ^g6 (16) 8(15) *g5 (15)<£>h7 (-9) cj>f5 (-9) £>h6 (-9)9 ^e3t (14) <£>h4 (14)*i6(-5)iBrice3(-8)*g4(-12)10 &e7i (13)

(0) 10 &f2t (+2)10... «?g3(13)*g4( - l l )

11 igre5t (12) *g2 (12)*«3(-9)*g4(-10)

12 #b2t (11) *h l (11)«O(-6)*g3( -8 )

13 1&blt (10)

952

Page 17: eg102-2.pdf

13 igralt (0) 13 # c l t (0)13... <J>g2(10)

13... iBrfl(-8)14 #c2t (9)

14 # g l t (0) 14 #a2t (+2) 14 #b2t (+2)14... $>f3(9)

14... <S?hl (-4) * g 3 (-6)(8)

(+2)15 ... <£e4 (8)

15... » g 4 ( - 6 )16 # f4 t (7)

16 #c2t (+2)16 ... $>d3 (7) 17 ^Td4t (6) <£e2(6)

17... £>c2(-6)18 >grb2t (5)

18 ^c4t (+2) 18 # d 2 t (+4)18... <S>f3 (5)

18... <£xe3 (+4) <£el (-3)19 ^f6+ (4)

19 ^f2+ (+4)19... <&e4(4)

19 ... <£*e3 (+5) # f5 (+3) <£g3 (-1)(-2) $>e2 (-2) $>g2 (-2)

(3)(+1) 20 igrf4t (+4)

20... £>f3 (3) 21 # f 4 t (2)21 #f6t (+2) 21 igrdlt (+8) 21 <&d5t (+11)

21 ... £>e2 (2)21.. . <£>g2(0)

(1)(4-6)

(0) <J>e422 ... $>d3 (1) 23(0)

23

24

25(-I

26.

(9)(-6) 24 #d4t (-6) 24 c2t (0)

24 ... <£xe3 (9) 25 # b 3 t (8)£>f4 (8)

(0)

26 >&x

(-1)

(7)

(-1)

27 <£c5 (0) 27 $>c6 (0) 27 ^Tg4t (0)(0) 27 ^ f l (0) 27 ^h4t (0) 27 ^h5 (0) 27^h6 (0) 27 ^rg3 (0) 27 ^Tc3 (0) 27 ^ra3 (0)27 igrhlt (0) 27 ^c7 (+1) 27 * e 7 (+1) 27

(+1) 27 £>e6 (+1) 27 ^rd7 (+1) 27(+1) 27 ^g2t (+1) 27 ^h7t (+1) 27

27... <S>f4(6)27... * d 4 ( 0 ) * f 5 ( - l )

28 <£>d5 (5)28 ^Td3 (0) 28 cj>e6 (+1) 28>grc4t (+1) 28 ^Td5 (+1) 28^c2 (+1) 28 * d l (+1) 28^b5 (+1) 28 # c 3 (+1) 28<£c7 (+2) 28 <£>e7 (+2) 28£>d7 (+2) 28 cj>c6 (+2) 28^ (+2) 28 ^a2 (+2) 28

(+2) 28 ^b8 ( + 2) 28(+2) 28 ^b2 (+2)28 ... <£g5 (5)

28... * f 5 ( 0 ) * g 4 ( - l )29 # f 3 (4)

29 cj>e5 (0) 29 &>e6 (+1) 29^rc4 (+1) 29 ^b4 (+1) 29>grd3 (+1) 29 >gre3t (+1) 29&>e4 (+2) 29 ^d6 (+2) 29

(+2) 29 ^rc2 (+2) 29(+2) 29 #b6 (+2) 29(+2) 29 <grc3 (+2) 29(+2) 29 «rbl (+2) 29

(+3)29..

#a4t

g£>d4^rdl

<£>c6

(+1) 28(+1) 28(+1) 28(+1) 28(+2) 28(+2) 28(+2) 28(+2) 28

(+1) 29(+1) 29(+1) 29(+2) 29(+2) 29(+2) 29(+2) 29(+3) 29

2 9 . . . *»h4 (0) <£g6 (0)30 ^ g 2 (3)

30 £>e6 (0) 30 ^rg4 (0) 30 ^ g 3 (0) 30 &>d6(+1) 30 ^>e5 (+1) 30 # e 4 (+1) 30(+1) 30 ^ f 5 (+1) 30 ^ f 6 t (+1) 30(+1) 30 >gre3t (+1) 30 ^>c6 (+2) 30(+2) 30 <&e4 (+2) 30 * C 5 (+2) 30(+2) 30 ^ e 2 (+2) 30 «rdl (+2) 30(+2) 30 ^grfBt (+2) 30 ^ d 3 (+2) 30(+2) 30 ^ b 3 (+2) 30 ^ a 3 (+2) 30(+2) 30 # f 2 (+2) 30 «rfl (+2)

30 ... <£>h7 (3)3 0 . . .

<£c4<$>d4

(6)

31 <£>e5 (2)31 <£>e6 (0) 31 s£>e4 (+1) 31 <S>d6 (+1) 31

(+1) 31(+2) 31(+2) 31(+2) 31(+2) 31

<£>c4

(+1) 31 ^ g 3 (+1) 31(+1) 31 >grgl (+1) 31(+2) 31 £>c5 (+2) 31(+2) 31 ^h3t (+2) 31

(+2) 31 ^c2t (+2) 31

953

Page 18: eg102-2.pdf

(+3) 31 >grhlt (+3) 31

igrf2

31 ... <£>h6 (2)

31 ... <£>h8(0)32 £>f6 (1)

32 £>e6 (+1) 32 &>f5 (+1) 32# g 4 (+1) 32 # g 8 (+1) 32<S>d6 (+2) 32 $>d4 (+2) 32£>d5 (+2) 32 <J>e4 (+2) 32^e4 (+3) 32 ^d5 (+3) 32W (+3) 32 ^a8 (+3) 32igrfl (+3) 32 ifirhlt (+3) 32^d2t (+3) 32 ^c2 (+3) 32^a2 (+3) 32 ^h2t (+3) 32

32 ... g>h5 (1) 3333 «f5 (+1) 33 ^e4 (+1) 33&>e7 (+2) 33 <S>g7 (+2) 33<S>f7 (+2) 33 <£>e6 (+2) 33

(+2) 33 ^g7 (+2) 33(+2) 33 grgl (+2) 33

(+3) 33 igrfl (+4) 33(+4) 33 #a2 (+4) 33(+5) 33 <&c6 (+5) 33

(+5) 33 «rhlt (+5)

3.4 Fig.4 shows annotated ultimateplay in 4001.

Chess GamesNovember 14, 1985

(+3) 31

g (+1) 32ifirgl (+1) 32&>f4 (+2) 32igrf3 (+3) 32

(+3) 32(+3) 32(+3) 32(+3) 32

(+4)(0)

(+1) 33(+2) 33(+2) 33(+2) 33(+3) 33(+4) 33(+4) 33(+5) 33

<£e5

g#£2

Initial Position

1 <£>d6t (30)(29) $>f7 (29)

(-ll)(28) S

(-22)(27)

i (-21)

(30) 2

3 (28)(-25); (27)

5 >grf7t (26) <S>e4 (26)5.. . »g4 ( -19 )

6 ^b7t (25)6 ^c5t (0)

6 ... £>d3 (25)6... *a(-6)*e3(-18)

7 #b3t (24) >d2 (24)7 ... *e2(-15)*e4(-16)

8 grb2t (23) < d3 (23)8 ... # e l (-15) <£>e3 (-16)

9 £c5t (22)

9 ... <£>e3 (22)9 ... ^xc5t ( -14)*c4( -20)

10 ^rc3+ (21)10 ^b3t (+2)

10... <3?f4 (21)10... <S>f2(-16)<J>e2(-19)

11 ^e6t (20) £>e4 (20)11... * f 5 ( - 1 2 ) * g 4 ( - 1 3 )

12 #c6t (19) «S>f5 (19)12... <£>e3(-12)

13 ^b5+ (18)13«rc2t(+12)

13... <J>g6(18)13 ... £>e4 (-10) <£>g4 (-11)*f6(-15)

14 ^e8+ (17) ^h7 (17)14 ... <S>f6 (-10) <£h6 (-10) «S

15 # f 7 t (16)15 ^e7t (0) 15 ^h5t (+2)

15 ... <£h6 (16)15... <S>h8(-12)

16 ^f6t (15)16 ifirfBt (+2)

16...16... < h

17 ^h4t (14)17^rh8t (+2)

17 ... # h 5 (14) 1818 #f6t (+2)

18... #h7(13)18... *g6(-4)«rg5(-ll)

(12)

(-16)

(-12)

(-17)

(13)

954

Page 19: eg102-2.pdf

19 ... #h6 (-5) # g 4 (-7) # g 6 (-8)# d l t (-8) «rf7 (-9) ^g5 (-10)(-10) #d5t (-10) ^rc5t (-10)

20 &d7 (11) ^d2t (11)20 ... &h6 (-4) &g3 (-6) ® g l (-6) ^ g(-6) @e5 (-8)d^b2 (-8) ^d6t (-9)<§c7t(-9)

21 $ e 8 (10) # h 6 (10)

21 ... ^ g 2 (-7) # c 3 (-8) # g 5 (-8)(-8) #d7t (-8) &d8t (-8) #b2 (-8)

22 £tf8t (9) <gg8 (9)22... ^xf8t(-3)

23 £g6 (8) # g 7 (8)23 ... #f8t (-4) # e 3 t (-4) $xg6t (-4)£>h7 (-5)

24 £>e7t (7)24 ^f5 (0)

24... <£h7(7)24 ... $>h8 (-3) ^xe7t (-4)

25 ^h4t (6)25 <grf5t (0)

25... # h 6 (6) 26 >gre4t (5)26 # g 4 (+5)

26... <£>h8(5)26... <S>g7(-l)#g6t(-3)

27 ^Tg4 (4)27 >&e5t (0) 27 # d 5 (+2) 27 ^f5 (+2) 27

31

27... # g27 ... W (+3) ^Tg6t (0) >grg5 (-1)(-1) #c6t (-1) ^h5t (-1) > f8t (-2)

(3)(+2) 28 ^h3t (+2) 28 ^f4 (+2)

28 ... ^h7 (3) 29 >&f4 (2)29 ^g5 ( + 2) 29 ^rf6t (+2) 29 >grg3 (+2) 29^g4 (+2) 29 ^rd4t (+2)

29... ^g7(2)29 ... ^ g 8 t (+2) ^rg6t (+2) >grxe7t (+2)

(+1) ^e4 (+1) ^d3 (+1) ^c2 (+1)(+1) ^h4 (+1) ^Th3 (+1) >^h2 (+1)(+I)^f7t (0)>grh5t (0)30 <*d7 (1)

30 ^h2t (+2) 30 ^h4t (+2) 30 ^re3 (+9)30 ^d2 (+9) 30 ^ c l (+9)

30... <£>h7(l)30 ... >£g6 (+4) ^xe7t (+3) >grf8 (+2)(+2) >^d4t (+2) >grg8 (+2) ^f7 (+2)

31 ... ^h6 (0) 32 # c 2 t (9)(9)

32... $>g7 (-2) >&g6 (-7)33 ^c8t (8)

33 >^b2t (-6) 33 # g 2 (-5) 33 >grc3t (-2)33.. .

33... ^rf834 ftf5t (7)

(+4)34... <S>f6(7)

34...35 4>h6 (6)

35 ^a6t (+2) 35 ^c6t (+2)35 ... <£>e5 (6)

35... «>g5(-l)36 &c4 (5)

36 > rc3t (0) 36 #b7 (+1) 36 Ta6 (+1) 36>grb8t (+1) 36 >gra8 (+1) 36 ^e8t (+1) 36

(+1) 36 ^h8t (+1) 36 ^c6 (+1) 36(+1) 36 # c 2 (+1) 36 ^ c l (+1) 36

(+1) 36 £ig4t (+1) 36 ^rd8 (+2) 36>grf8 (+2) 36 >grc7t (+2) 36 ^e8 (+2) 36<£c6 (+2) 36 ^>d8 (+2) 36 <£c7 (+2) 36 £tf5(+2) 36 ^f7t (+2) 36 £>g8 (+2)

36... <S>f6 (5) 37 # c 5 (4)37 &>e8 (0) 37 cj>d6 (0) 37 ftf7 (0) 37 ^b5(0) 37 ^d5 (0) 37 ^c7 (0) 37 ^d4t (0) 37

(0) 37 ^f4t (0) 37 ^g4 (0) 37 ^h4t37 >grc3t (0) 37 &>C6 (+1) 37 <^d8 (+1)<£>c7 (+1) 37 £>g4t (+1) 37 4^g8t (+1)^ra6t (+1) 37 ^re6t (+1) 37 ^b3 (+1)>grd3 (+1) 37 <&e2 (+1) 37 ^ f l t (+1) 37

b4 (+1) 37 ^a4 (-fl) 37 ^c2 (+1) 37(+2) 37 4 f5 (+2) 37 ^rf7t (+2) 37(+2) 37 ^a2 (+2) 37 ^c6t (+2) 37

(+2)37^c l (+2)37. . .

37.. .

38

38 <£>e8 (0) 38 <&e6 (0) 38 <£>d6 (+1)(+1) 38 ^f5 (+1) 38 £>f7 (+1) 38 4 g8 (+1)38 ^Td6t (+1) 38 ^f8 (+1) 38 ^b4 (+1) 38

(+1) 38 ^d4 (+1) 38 <&e3 (+1) 38(+1) 38 ^rd5 (+1) 38 ^e5 (+1) 38(+1) 38 # c 3 (+1) 38 £>c8 (+2) 38

^ (+2) 38 $>d8 (+2) 38 <&c7 (+2) 38>grb6t (+2) 38 >gra7 (+2) 38 ^e7 (+2) 38

(0)373737

955

Page 20: eg102-2.pdf

(+2) 38 #c6t (+2) 38 #c7 (+2) 38(+2) 38 #b5 (+2) 38 #a5 (+2) 38(+2) 38 #c2t (+2) 38 fcl (+2)38... #g7(3)

38... <£h7(-l)<£>xh6(-l)39 # g l t (2)

39 # g 5 t (0) 39 ^rh5 (0) 39 <&e8 (+1) 39$>e6 (+1) 39 &g4 (+1) 39 £>f7 (+1) 39 £>g8(+1) 39 ^ b 6 ( 1 ) 39 ^ 7 ( 1 ) 39 # d 6(+1) 39(+1) 39(+1) 39(+1) 39(+1) 39(+1) 39

(+1) 39(+1) 39(+1) 39(+1) 39

(+1) 39(+1) 39 ^(+1) 39 <£>d6

(4-1) 39, (+1) 39

(4-1) 39(4-1) 39(4-1) 39(4-1) 39

, -, -- _ - (+1) 39 _ _ -, .. . . . .(4-2) 39 <J>d7 (4-2) 39 £>f5t (4-2) 39 <£>d8(+3)

3 9 . . . <£>h7(2)

3 9 . . . <£>xh6(0)

40 * £ 7 (1)

40 <J>f6 (0) 40 £>f5 (0) 40 ^ g 5 (0) 40 <£>f8(4-1) 40 <£e6 (4-1) 40 ftg8 (4-1) 40 >£g2(4-1) 40 ^rg3 (+1) 40 ^ g 4 (4-1) 40 >grg8t(+1) 40 £>d6 (4-2) 40 <£>e8 (4-2) 40 <£>d7(4-2) 40 £>g4 (4-2) 40 ^rf2 (4-2) 40(4-2) 40 ^rd4 (4-2) 40 ^ c 5 (4-2) 40(4-2) 40 ^ra7 (4-2) 40 <grh2 (4-2) 40(4-2) 40 <grel (4-2) 40 # d l (4-2) 40(4-2) 40 i&blt (4-2) 40 ifiral (4-2) 40

40 ... £>h8 (1) 41 ^rg8# (0)

41 <J>f8 (+1) 41£>f5 (+1) 41

(+1) 41(4-1) 41

6 (+1) 41 £g4 (+1) 41(+1) 41 # d 4 t (4-1) 41(4-1) 41 # g 3 (4-1) 41

^g4 (41) 41 ^g5 (4-1) 41 ifiralt (+1) 41iBrhl (4-1) 41 *>e8 (+2) 41 *>e6 (4-2) 41<£>e7 (4-2) 41 iHr!2 (+2) 41 # e 3 (4-2) 41^ 5 (4-2) 41 ^b6 (+2) 41

(+2) 41 ifirel (+2) 41(4-2)

igrdl

()(+2) 41(4-2) 41

3.5 Fig.5 gives 15 examples of unan-notated optimal play (to conversionthis time, not ultimate) in 1033. It isnoteworthy how some solutions skirtthe Karstedt draw, just as optimalplay in 1060 skirts the Lolli draw. Nrepresents knight.

=0b4

d7

=bb=bk1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.

10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.27.28.29.30.31 .32.33.34.35.36.37.38.39.

=0 i

=wq=wk=bn=bb=bk1.2.3.

e3c6Ka8QblQhl4-Qb7+Qc8Qh8QhlKb8Qh7Ka7Qhl4-

Ka6Qh8Kb50hS+Qf3+Kc4Qd54-Qe4Qc6Qb5+Qb2Qb4 +Kd4Ke4Qd2Qf2 +Qb6Qd8+Qd2Kf5Ke6Qd8Kf7Kg8Qd2 +Kh7Qdl +K : g6

alclb2c3b3KblQa2 +Kc2

Bc5Bb6Kc7Kd6Bc7Nc5Bb6Ne6Bd8KcBKdBNd4Ne6Kd5Bg5Ke5Bf4KfBBc7Ke5KdBNf4KeBBe5+Ng6Kf6KQ5

Bh8Kg4Kh5Ne7+Ng6Kh6Ne5+Ng6Kh5BalKh4

Nc4Kb4Be5

956

Page 21: eg102-2.pdf

4. Qa75. Kd3G. Ke47. Qf78. Qd5+9. Qc4

10. Kd511. Ke612. Qb3+13. Kd514. Kc515. Kb516. Ka617. Qg8+18. Qf819. Qc5+20. Kb721. Q--c8+

=0 *=wq gl=wk e5=bn g3=bb h3=bk g41. Qdl+2. Qd4+3. QfZ4. Kf45. Kg56. Qe37. Kf48. Q"-g3+ +

= 0 *=wq a4=wk a8=bn a5=bb c5=bk aG1. Kb82. Kc83. Kd74. Qal5. Qc36. Qc47. Qe6 +8. QcG+9. Ke6

10. Qa8

KbBNa5Nc6Kc5KbBBb8Ne7+

Nc6Kc7Nd8Nb7 +Nd6 +Kc8Kc7Nc8Kd8Kd7

Kh4Bg4Kh3Ne2 +Ng3BdlBe2

KbGNc6Nb4Nd3Nb4NaGKb5Ka5Bd4Kb5

11.12.13.14.15.1G.17.18.19.20.21.

=0=wq=wk=bn=bb=bk1.2.3.4.5.B.7.8.9.

10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19,20,21

2324252627282930313233

Qb7+Qd7 +Qd5+Kd7Qdl +Qf 1 +Qf5+KcBQd3Kb7K = a7

*

gia8c6d6c7Qe3Qd3Qd7Qb7 +Qa6Qg6Qg5Kb8Kc7Qcl +Kd7QflQblQa2KdBQg8

, Kd5. Ke4. Qc4 +. Ke3. Kf2. Ke2. Kdl. Qe2 +. Qc2 +. Ke2. Qd3+. Qh3. Kd3. Qe6 +. Kc4. Qe3. Qf4

Bb6Kc5Kb4Ka4Kb5Ka5Kb4Bc5Nb8 +Ba7

Bf8KbGBb4Kc5Na5Kd4Kc3Nc6 +Nd4Kb3Bc3Bb2Kc3Nc2Nb4Nc2Nb4 +Kc2Bc3Kb2Bd2Bc3Na2Kb3Ka3Bb2Bc3Kb2Kb3Kb2NclBh8Kbl

957

Page 22: eg102-2.pdf

34. Qe4+

35. Qb7+

36. Qh7+

37. Q:h8+

=0 *

=wq gl

=wk a8

=bn c6

=bb d5

=bk c7

1. Qg7+

2. Qb7+

3. Qc7

4. Kb7

5. Qc8

G. Qd7+

7. Kc7

8. Qg7

9. Qh7

10. Kd6

11. Qh3

12. Qh6

13. QeG

14. Qh3

15. Qfl

16. Qgl+

17. Ke5

18. Qc5+

19. Kf4

20. Kf3

Kg3

Qf2 +

Qh2

Kf3

25. Ke3

26. Kd4

27. K c 3

28. Kb4

29. Qf4+

30. Ka3

31. Qh2

32. Qd6

33. Qd2

34. Qb4

35. Q:b2++

=0 #

=wq el

=wk cl

=bn e3

Kb2Kc2Kb2

21.

22 .23.24.

KbG

Kc5

Bg2

Bf3

Kd4

Ke3

Ne5

Kf4

Ke3

Nd3

Ke4

Kd4

Be4

Nel

Nc2

Kc3

Bh7

Kd2

Bg6

Nel +

Bc2

Kdl

Nd3

Nb2

Kcl

Ba4

Ndl +

Bc2

Kbl

Bd3

Bf5

Bc2

Nb2

Bd3

=bb=bk1.2.3.4.5.G.7.8.9.

10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.27.28.29.30.31 .JJ2. .

= 0 *= wq= wk=bn=bb=bk1 .

3.4.5.6.7.8.9.

10.

c3d3Qh4Qd8 +Qe8Qg6 +KdlQe6Ke2Qg4 +

QglQg2 +Qf2 +QglQdlQd2 +Qa5Qa3Qa6 +Qa5 +Qb6 +Kd2Qb5 +Qb7+Qb4 +Ke2Qc5+Qf5Kf3Kg4Qf7Qf8 +Qd6 +Q: d3

eldld4c3d3Qf 1 +

Qh6 +Kc2QdGQa6 +Qe6 +Kd3Qe2 +Ke4

Be5

Ke4

Nc4

Kd4

Ke3

Kd4

BdG

Kd5

Bc7

Kd4

Kc3

Be5

Nb2

Kc4

Bc3

Be5

Kc5

Kd4

Kc4

Kd5

Ke4

Kf4

Kg5

Bh8

KhB

Bg7

Bc3

Bh8

Nd3

Bg7

Kh7

Ke3Nf3Kf2Bd2Ke2Ke3Kf2Bf4Kg3Nh4

958

Page 23: eg102-2.pdf

11. Qel+

12. Qdl+

13. Qb3+

14. QeB+

15. Qg8 +

16. Qd8+

17. Kf5

18. QfG

19. Q:gB++

=0 *

=wq al

=wk a2

=bn c3

=bb d2=bk c2

1. Ka3

2. Ka4

3. Kb4

4. Kb5

5. Qfl

6. Qe2+

7. Qf2

8. Qf7 +

9. KcG

10. Qf2 +

11. Qf5 +

12. Qc2

13. Qa4+

14. Kd5

15. Qe4 +

IB. Kc4

17. Qh7

18. Qd3+

19. Qbl+

20. Kd3

21. Kc2

22. Qal

23.'Kdl

24. QaG

25. Q^e2+

=0 *

= uiq d4=wk e5

=bn d5

=bb b7

*=bk c7

1. Qa7

2. Qa5

3. Qc3+

Kg4Kg3Kg4Kg5Ng6KhbBg3Bel

Nbl +

Nc3+

Ndl +

Nb2Bc3Kb3Be5Kc3Kd2Kd3Kd4Nd3Ke3Bb2Kd2NclNe2KelBelNf4 +

Ne2KflBf4Bc7

NbBKcGKd7

4. Qc5

5. Qc2

6. Qh7 +

7. Qf7

8. Qc4

9. Qcl

10. Qc3

11. Qc5

12. KfB

13. Qf8

14. Ke5

15. Qg7

16. QfB

17. KdB

18. Qf8++

=0 *

=wq h8

=wk a8

-bn e5

=bb c7

=bk bG

1. Qhl

2. Kb7

3. Qe4

4. Kc8

5. Kd8

6. Qc2+

7. Qdl+

8. Kd7

9. Qb3

10. Kc6

11. Kc5

12. Qb2+

13. Qd4+

14. KdG15. Qd5+

1G. Qe6+

17. Qf5

18. Ke6

19. KdS

20. Ke4

21. Qfl

22. KfB

23. KeG

24. Qc4

25. Kf7

26. Qe2+

27. Qg4

28. Qg7+

29. Qh8+

30. Q=d8

Nc8Bc6Kd8Ba4Nb6Be8Nc8Bd7Be8Kd7Ne7Kd8Bb5

Bd3

Kc5BdGNc4Nb6 +

Nd5Kd4Ke5Bb4Bd2Ne7+

Bg5Ke4KfBNgGKfBKg7Bf4+

Nf8+

NgGBe5BfBNh4 +

Bg5KhBKh5KhGBd8Kh5Kg4

959

Page 24: eg102-2.pdf

=0*uq-uk-bn=bb=bk1.2.3.4.5.G.7.8.9.

10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.27.28.29.30.31.

#aBa7e4c6c5Qf8+Qg7+Qb2QclKbGQalQf 1 +Qf4 +Qe3Kc6KdGQd2Ke5Qa5Kd5QelKe4Kd4Ke3Qh4Kd4QelQc3 +Qd2Qb4Qa3Kc3Kd2Qb4Kc3Q:b2++

Kd4Kc4Nc3Bf3Kd4Kc4Be2Kd5Kc4Bd3Ne2Nc3Ne2Kb3Kc2Ba6Nc3+Ne2 +Nc3Ndl +Nb2Bd3KblBc2KclKblNdl +Nb2BdlKcl

4.0 Cheron, Lehr- und Hand-buch derEndspiele. Many 5-man positionswere tested against data bases inx-xi.85 during the fortnight of AJR'svisit to Ken Thompson in New Jer-sey.4.1 All 0401 examples have correctverdicts.4.2 In 0410 two verdicts are in error.409 (a5a8 0410 a5b7cl) is a drawBTM: l...Ra7+ 2.Kb6 Kb8! 3.RflRc7 4.Rf8+ Rc8 5.Rf7 Rc2(c4)6.Bb4 Kc8 7.Bc5 Kd8 (Re2) 8.Kc6

Re2 9.Bb4 Rc2 + (Re-) 10.Kd6 Ke8ll.Rfl Re2 (many!) 12.Kc6 Re6 (Rd8)13.Bd6 Kd8 14.Ral Ke8 15 .Ra7 Rh6(i.a.) 16.Re7 + Kd8 17.Rf7 Re618.Rf8-f Re8 19.Rf6 Rel (i.a.)2O.Bc5Re2 drawn.4.3 In 0410 412 (b6b8 0410 h3c7c6) isadrawWTM:l.Be4Rc3!5.0 Averbakh (Russian edition,1982). Every move in 4000.10 waschecked. Errors were to be expectedand if one includes departures fromoptimality many (far too many toenumerate) were found.5.1 Fig.6 shows the position after3.. .Qh8 in Fontana and Roycroft (1stPrize, British Chess Federation, 1957- see 309 in TTC), and the outputfrom the computer.

Chess GamesNovember 9, 1985

(+2) 1

Initial Position

(14)

(0) 1 £>c6 (+2) 1(+3) 1 &e7 (+6) 1 # d 7 (+6)

(+6) 1 ^ d 3 (+6) 1 ^ a 6 t (+12) 1(+13) 1 #c7 t (+15) 1 # h 2 (+16)

1 ... <£>a4 (14)

1 ... <£>b4 (-10)(13)

(+2) 2 &d7i (+6) 2 #f5 (+6) 2(+7) 2 ^f7 (+14) 2 # d 3 (+14) 2(+16) 2 ^c6 t (+18) 2 # d l t (+24)

2 ... <£>a5 (13)

#a3(-10)3 ^ e 4 (12)

(+2) 3 ^c5t (+2) 3 #a2t (+3) 3

960

Page 25: eg102-2.pdf

g (+7) 3 #h4 (+7) 3 #d3 (+8) 3(+8) 3 Tf7 (+9) 3 ^ra6t (+14) 3 >grc7t(+17)

3 ... $b5 (12)

3 ... ^g7t (0) ^b2t (0) <&c3 (-7) # a l(-8) #f6 (-9) ^f8 (-10) #d8 (-10)

4 <£>c7 (11)

4 # d 5 t (+3) 4 #f5t (+8) 4 ^rblt (+8) 4#e2 t (+8) 4 ^Td3t (+9) 4 &e7 (+9) 4(+11) 4 <£>a7 (+14) 4 <grg6 (+14) 4

(-9)

(-7)(-8)

4. . .4 ... <grc3t (0) $>a5 (0) <£c5 (0)^ b 2 (-9) # a l (-9) # f8 (-9)

5 £>d6 (10)

5 <£>d8 (0) 5 <£c8 (+6) 5 <S>b8 (+25)

5... ^f6t(10)5 ... ^Th6t (0) #f8t (-1)(-8) #c3 (-8) #b2 (-8)(-8)*a6(-8)*a5(-8)

6 &e6 (9)

6 ^>d7 (+1) 6 £>c7 (+2) 6 <£d5 (+2)

6.. . ^f8+(9)

6 ... #d8t (-7) ^g7 (-7)(-7) rc3 (-7) #b2 (-7)

(-7) ^Txe6t (-7) ^rf4t (-7)7 #e7 (8)

(-7)(-7)

7...(-3)

( -

8 <J>c7 (7)

+8) 8 <£d5 (+8)8 ... ^ h 2 t (7)

>grh5 (-1)(-3) #c6t (-3)(-5) ^h l (-5)(-5)

9 <J>c8 (6)

9 $>d7 (0) 9 <&b7 (+7) 9 $>d8 (+8)

9.. .

(-6) ^c8 (-6)(-6) #f3 (-6)

8 (-2)(-3)(-5)

(-2)(-5)(-5)

(-4)(-4)(-4)

9 ... <&a6 (-3) ^c2 t (-3)(-4) &>c4 (-4) s£>b6 (-4)(-4) ^rh6 (-4) # g 2 (-4)(-4) # h l (-4)

10 <£>b8 (5)10 <&b7 (+1) 10 Td7t (+1) 10 c7 (+1) 10

(+1) 10 &d7 (+2) 10 <£>c7 (+2) 10(+3) 10 ^e4 (+6)

10...10 ... «£>a4 (0) <J>c4 (0) 4>c6 (-2) ^»a6 (-3)$b6 (-3) *a5 (-3) # h 6 (-3) ^ h 3 (-3)>grhl (-3)

11 #c7 (4)

11 <£>a8 (+1) 11 <&a7 (+2) 11 £>c8 (+2) 11(+9)

11 ... &h5 (4)

.. -£rh3 (-1) ^rh4 (-1) #xc7t (-2)

(-2) ^rb2 (-2) # h l (-2)12 ^d7t (3)

12 $>a7 (+1) 12 # b 7 t (+2) 12 e 7 (+2) 12£>c8 (+3) 12 ^>a8 (+19) 12 £>b7 (+22) 12>grc2 (+29)

12... <^a6(3)

12 ... £>c5 (0) «>c4 (-1) £>b6 (-1)

13 ^ a 4 t (2)

13 >grc6t (0) 13 >grd3t (0) 13 d 6 t (+1) 13>grc8t (+2) 13 # e 6 t (+2) 13 a 7 t (+2) 13#b7 t (+3) 13 &e7 (+13) 13 <&c8 (+14) 13$>a8 (+20) 13 <S>c7 (+21)

13.. . $>b6 (2) 14 ^rd4+ (1)

14 #b3 t (+2) 14 # b 4 t (+2) 14 a 7 t (+3)

14... <£>b5 (1) 15 h8^r (1)

Yuri Bazlov, from Vladivostok in theSoviet Far East.

(with acknowledgement to "64").

961

Page 26: eg102-2.pdf

6. The 10 study positions of the com-puter micro test reported in EG63(ii81) were also solved, later, and withgreat success, by Ken Thompson'sBELLE - only one move gave trou-ble!7. The sixth conference in the seriesAdvances in Computer Chess tookplace in London in viii90. The papersare now published. They include Tomake dumb skill endgame data basesspeak', jointly authored by Don Bealand AJR.8. Lewis Stiller (see EG98) discardedhis 5-man data bases. And why?Well, why retain what can be regene-rated within a minute or two?! Whata world we live in, when all that weneed is for everyone to have access tothe Connection Machine and to bean ace programmer! In addition topawnless endings Stiller also genera-ted many data bases with a pawn.Bare statistics are in the ICCA Jour-nal.

c4c4c4d4c4d4d4d4c4d4d4

d5d5d3e5d3c5c5e5b5c3c5

e4e6e2f6c2b6d6d6a4b4b4

b7b3b5c3b5e3a3g3d7ele7

3345668891010

Our thanks go to Peter Jensen andHans Rasmussen, leading program-mers of DEEP THOUGHT in theUSA and ChessBase in Germany res-pectively, for supplying the identicalinformation independently.

ZUGZWANGS in GBR class 0014The left-hand column shows theBTM solution depth. The right-handcolumn is a serial number. This list is

*c*ZUGZWANG POSITIONS IN4-MAN PAWNLESS ENDGAMESGBR class 1300-GBR class 0130-GBR class 0103 -0130wK

a3c3c3c3c40103wK

c3c3c4c4c3c4c4

-RvswR

alalg6h5e6

-RvswR

d4d4c3c5c4d5d3

.BbK

c2b5a2a4a3

.SbK

c5e5a4a4a3c6e4

none518

bB

bla4f8clf2

bS

b2b2ala7a6b3bl

depth(BTM)22111314

depth(BTM)1122333

UI UCICU

square.

05030603030505030303070909045262183029595649

wKa2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3

vy v

wBc5d2d2d2d2d4d4elelele4f4b5f2a2a2b4c5c5flc2h5

wSe4d3e4hih3c2d3flf5g2a4b3blb3a7hic3e3f2b2a7g2

UcllC

bKa4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4c2c3alalalalalalalal

W1LI11I

bSdldldldldldldldldldlelflb8bla6c5c5c6c6c6d3d3

1 WIV

001002003004005006007008009010011012013014015016017018019020021022

962

Page 27: eg102-2.pdf

501362131238111135155930302658054825523564283603030603030305050505040404612721453039383821214913400351

a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3

d5b4c2e3e3e3f4f4f4f4h5f4f4f4g4f2g4f4a2e3f3f4e3d3d3d3d3d3d3e2e2e2g2e3e3e3a4ele3b3b4dldldle3e3a4b2b3b2b3

c3e2b2flf5h3a6b7d3d7f8b8d8f8c7f3c7e6h3glh2f8h3d4ele5glh2h4f2f6g3d6flhih5dlb4d4b4e3b2c5f2d4d4a2d4a2d4a2

alalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5blblblblblblblblblblblblblblbl

d4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e5e7e7e7e7flf4f5g3g3g3h4h5d2d2d2d2d2d2d2d2d2d2e2e2e2a2a5a6b2b6clclcld7e4e7e7f8glg7

023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073

410323494818601313020227201727123824102921211818182560152560090708115818060606040501020503060505030303

a3a3a3a3a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2

dlb2b2dlf5a3e2d8d4b4b4c5a3a3cld4g7cld4g6a3a3a3a3a3clc2f4d4e7e3d4e3c5b3a3b7b7b7d3b4c3c4d5e2e4e4e4flflfl

a2d4ela2dlc5f2b3h7dld3d3b5e2d4f8d4e2g6d2c7d6f4glg3d4d3d3d3d5d2g2f3d4d3ela3a5b3b5b5b7a3f4e3a3d2e3glg5h2

blblblblalala2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a6a6a6a6a6blblc3c3c4c5c6a4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4

h2h4h4h4d5f2a3a6a8blblc2c6c6c7c7c7d5d5d6d8d8d8d8d8e7f6g4h7b7cld3d3glc2f7a7a7a7alblb3clelelelelelelelel

074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124

963

Page 28: eg102-2.pdf

070809090101010147103450396301010202590202013139290309332929341023052927192526272928580527172317232626

b2b2b2b2b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3

f4g4g4e3a2a2a2a2e2e2e2e2e2c2a2a2a2a2d5a2a2c4a4dla3e2e2e2b2b2dle3a3b4b2b2b2b2b2b2c5c5fla3a3a3a3b2b2a3a3

b3a3c3a3b4d4ele3b6e3f2f6g5b8a3a3blc4h2blc4b8f4f2h8b5d5e4e6g6e2dlh8a2a8c8a7b6e5f4e3f2b2a7b8e7h6c6f5a6a8

b4b4b4b4alalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala5blblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblbl

flglglh3a3a3a3a3b2b2b2b2b2d3ele3g2g2g3g4g4b4a2a2b2b2b2b2b4b4b5b5b6b7b8b8c2c2c2c2c6c6c6c7c7c7c7c7c7dldl

125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175

212826262222282222082829282826260417236523361220272602311010120812112835121010091423580416222929255704

b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3

a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3e3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a4b2a3a3a3e5a3a3a3a3a3b4e3e3e3e3e3e3f4f4f4f4e7h5a3a3a3f4f4f4g4a3

g2g6a6a8b7c8d7e8f7g2g6h6a6a8b7c8f7b8h6f8f5h3b5e6b6b5c4dlflf3e2dlflf5hih3h5a6b7d3d7f2f8c2c6f5b8d8f8c7a6

blblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblbl

d3d3d5d5d5d5d5d5d5d5d5d6d7d7d7d7d7d8d8d8d8ele2e2e3e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e5e5e6e6e6e7e7e7e7e8

176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226

964

Page 29: eg102-2.pdf

040404240418142709220527112222292201150429312957544749282624032703032703110303031111131723272727271113

b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3

a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3b2a3a3a3a3a3f3f3g4g4a3a3f4a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3b4b2b2a3a3a3a3a3a3

a8b7c8d7f7g8h7a7b2b6c5c7ele3f6g5h4fla7cld8f8g7c5d4c7f6c6e6e6a5a7b6c5c7d6ele3e5g5h2h4f4c6f5a7a7c5c7d4d6

blblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblbl

e8e8e8e8e8e8e8f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f3f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f5f5f5f6f6f6f6f6f6f6f6f6f6f6f6f6f8f8glg3g3g3g3g3

227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277

112134586040472828262628262211291111303029272723102528281412162812161423282830262903252828161616282812

b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3

a3a3e3f3g2g4h7a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3b2b2a3a3a3a3e3f4a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3g3h2a3f4a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3

glg5glh2a2a2d3a6a8b7c8d7e8f7ele3h2h4d8g7b8d8f8h6h6f8a6a8b7c6c8d7e6e8f7h7a6a8h7d5b2elf8a6a8b7c6c8d3d7e6

blblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblblbl

g3g3g3g3g3g3g3g4g4g4g4g4g4g4g5g5g5g5g6g6g7g7g7g7g7g7hihihihihihihihihihih3h3h3h3h3h4h4h5h5h5h5h5h5h5h5

278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328

965

Page 30: eg102-2.pdf

161612303529272702030303030409230137230718050714010413020303030506050507242407162725272728281724176364

b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4

a3a3a3a3e3a3a3a3a3e3e3e3e3f3e4f5e2b7b4f5c3elelelc2b8f4d4a7a7b6d6d6d6e5d7a5a5f5a3e5e5e5e5d4elele5a3f5e6

f5f7h3h7h3b8d8f8a4e4flhih5gla4f6c3b2e3c3c4c2d5g2e4c4c2c2a8e8c6b5c2c6d7c3g3

c3d4c7e3e7f6b5dld3d5e3e3c5

blblblblblblblblb5b5b5b5b5b5b5b7clclclclclclclclclc5dld3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3ela2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2

h5h5h5h5h5h6h6h6a2e2e2e2e2f2h4f2b2b4b6b6c2dldldlhia4b5a4a6a6a6a6a6a6a6a7a8a8b6ala3a3a3a3blblblblb6clcl

329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379

181010101036503717616718536241184029272804434762603213312966575249296260056059225934080424061307210910

b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4

a3a3a3a3a3a3e4a3a3f5f3clf3h7e5a3e5e6e6e6e7b3c6a4a4e4g6e4h6a4a4a4e4e4e4a4f4a4a4f8a4g6h4e3h7c4h2h2f5e5c5

f5a4b5d5e4d6b3f5c5a4dla3a4d3b6e6c4a5d6d8d7hia3a6b3c7d2d5elf8elf2c5e3f2e3a3d7e4f3g2f2a3a3f2a5b2e6f6a5d4

a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a2a6a6a6a6blb2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b2b6b6b6b6b6b7

c8dldldldld2e5flf2f2f6g2g3g3

h3h6b6b6b6b7h2b6b7b7b8d6d7d7d8e5e5e5e5e5e7flf7f7f7g6

hih3h6clcle2f2h5gl

380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427428429430

966

Page 31: eg102-2.pdf

rqr^

firqrirjr^

r^fN

ricococo

rqr^

OD

oX)tiO

oJ)t)ObX

)bX)oobX

)bO o

oX

X^

xJ

x:

^ ctf <rt cs X

) X> X>

X)

u o

o o

o o

o

'O'O

U1

3 o

b/)^ TD

^ W

)X5 £

D u

^

U(*H

o

s

i^

£^

niX

i o rtD

ow

a>

O<

i><

uX

)^

<u

c^

c^

(D

UO

oT

3^

o^

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

co

c^

)fr

)^^

\OC

OC

OV

©V

OC

O'-H

^C

O*

-*r

vJC

<lC

NJ

O>

/^C

4^

VO

C4

CO

«/->

l/^

rtr

trtc

i3rt£

££

££

uo

ou

ou

tjT)T

)'O

i)

rocoT

^

OUU(J(JUUUUUU

fS

fn

N^

H^

H^

^N

^^

^fn

in

^fn

fn

n

Page 32: eg102-2.pdf

535314556146462130160420184101015766565643582555225841563141111123356242322305050202191905160303090408

c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3

c6c6c6c6d7d7d7c2c7c7c7d4d8c2b3b3e8b5dlc6b3f3c4dlc2c6c2d7b8c2d2d2c2c2dlc2dlc2d3d3d3d3a6a6c4f3f3f3c4g3c4

d4ele3e5c5f6g3g4e8h5h7c6g6e7ala5h6a6a6d7c5dlb6b4b4g6b4g3d6f6a7c7d3h5h6d3g7d3a7c7d4d6b4e5d6dlf4gl

hie5

a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a5c5c5c5c5c5

d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d7d7d7d7d7d7d8e3e3e5e6e6a8flflf4f4f6f7g5g5

g7g7g7g8h3h4h5h6h7a3a3a3a3a5a5clflf2f2gl

h2

533534535536537538539540541542543544545546547548549550551552553554555556557558559560561562563564565566567568569570571572573574575576577578579580581582583

070922230507243145360606020240404062333339223030301136422006063020353544393937363832333555454040405157

c3c3c3c3c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4

e2e2f5g5d3d3g5d2f8c3c2c2d4d4dldldlg6b6b6dlc2c3c3c3c2c3dld7d7d7c7d4c3e5e8c3c3c3f4alf5c7f6f3e8c3c3c3f6g7

b4d4f6g6f2f8dle4a4b5a8c8dld3d7a4d7d3e5f4e5e5a6b3d7f4b4g5a5e7f6dla7d3b2d6a7c7d6d5c3d6dldld4e4b7c8e8e8b3

c5c5c7c7d5d5a2a2a2a2a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3

h2h2f2g2a3a3b3c6d8f3a4a4a4a4a6a8a8blb4b4b4b7c6c6c6c7c7c7c7c7c7d7d7e6e6e7f3f3f3f3f8g5g6g6g7g8h2h2h2h3h3

584585586587588589590591592593594595596597598599600601602603604605606607608609610611612613614615616617618619620621622623624625626627628629630631632633634

968

Page 33: eg102-2.pdf

271901320109191913050127030312082910031912141906040429121614142630280125373718142636314040263838312240

c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4

e4d4b4alb4c3d8d8d8c5b4g7clclc3c3c7c7c7d4d8d8d8d8c8c8c5d6b2d2d2e5e5f2b4c7clc3e7d2d4e4e4c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3

f4d3b7d4ble7a5a7d4bla8b7hih3a8d5e8h5h7c6c6f3f7g6h6h8d2alh5c2g2c6f3d5a2blb7e8c6a7b7clf6a6a8blb7c8dld3d5

a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4

a7a8b3b4b5b8b8b8b8c2c8c8dldld7d7d7d7d7d7d7d7d7d7d8d8elele2e2e2e2e2e2e4e4e6e6e6e7e7e7e7f3f3f3f3f3f3f3f3

635636637638639640641642643644645646647648649650651652653654655656657658659660661662663664665666667668669670671672673674675676677678679680681682683684685

403838385919220336142141092813393939322820282833433939363338221722232015202237301010393219543239405326

c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4

c3c3c3c3c3c3c5d2c3c3c3c3c3c7d8b4c3c3c3c5c5c5c5c3c7b4c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3c3b8d2d2c3c3c3c3c3c3d4c3c3

e6e8f5f7ald6b7b5b5c7e3e7f4g7d4e8a7c7e3b3b7c6f3dldlf5c7d6f2g3a8b5c2c8d5e2e8f5f7d6a7c7c2e3f6f3e3h6b7g3fl

a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4a4

f3f3f3f3f4f4f5f5f7f8f8f8f8f8f8glglglglg2g2g2g2g4g4g5g5g5g5g5g6g6g6g6g6g6g6g6g6g7g7g7g8h2h2h3h4h4h4h6h7

686687688689690691692693694695696697698699700701702703704705706707708709710711712713714715716717718719720721722723724725726727728729730731732733734735736

969

Page 34: eg102-2.pdf

371305050202080604060735120918342337165865061957241014583544120809643013131317182106120920070909081559

c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4

c3cld4d4d4d4d6c6dlflflh2clc5c6g7e3c7f2f4f4a3b4d7d8e4d8d7f4h5f3h2glf4b4d7d7f6g3b4f8g4g4g4g4c3e5e5e5g5g5

f5a7a8c8d5d7a8e3f2b2c5a8c8d2g7dld8a5g2d7e7b4g3e5d2e3f3f3e3c5b7d8b2d5f5c8e8b3f4h5f3b3d8h6h8e2b3d3elg2g4

a4a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a6a6a6a8blblb2b2b2b2b2b2b2b6b6b7b7clc2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2

h7ala4a4a4a4a6blclclclclc2c2glg4h7cle2g4dla4e8b7b8b8d7d8f3g5a2e2cldlb8b7b7c6c7e8f7glg5g5g5h5h5h5h5h5h5

737738739740741742743744745746747748749750751752753754755756757758759760761762763764765766767768769770771772773774775776111778779780781782783784785786787

142205060405141413220707070909121113111034181558150514171720183516060917140607030907071116141708626122

c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4d4d4d4

f4f8h2h2h2h2f5f5c5g5g4c5e3e3e3d4a4d7e8d6b2d7d7g6g4d4dldldldldld4d7b4d7d7c3b4c8c7e7b5b5dldldldlc5a4dl*7

f8h4b2f8a4e6e3f6g6g6h2e6b5d5elf5b5a3b5gld4b7g2d4d7f3blflf3g6h4g6a4b3c3c5e6d5d4a8c6d3d4c3d2b5fle4c4d7b7

c2c2c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6c6d2d2d2d2d2d2d2d2d2d6d6d6d6d6d6d7e2e3e3e3e3e4e4e4e4e4e4e4e5e5f6f6g4a2a2a2

h8h8clcle2e2f2f2g2g2g3h3h3h3h3a4a6a6a6a7blc7c7d8a2a4clclclclcld7a8blc7c7a6blb4b7b7b8b8clclclclc8c7g6g8

788789790791792793794795796797798799800801802803804805806807808809810811812813814815816817818819820821822823824825826827828829830831832833834835836837838

970

Page 35: eg102-2.pdf

111618071724392522544412166442051216304125081205090606411313070710182907070714230612101319140814121115

d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4

e8d5d5g8d5dld7d7e4c6a4ele7d7e8e4b5e4e4e8h3d7d5d5d5e4e4d7d7d7d7d7d7d7e4e5e5e5e6c2e6e6f5f5g5d7d7e6d5d7e8

h4c3a2c3f4b4a5d2f4g4g4d5d3a4c4e3h4d3f7e3e5c3c3c7d6c5g4ele3e5f4f8h4h8d6c3c4g5blf4c3c3e3e7c5g4h7bld6e5d6

a3a3a4a5a5b2b2b2b2b2b2b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4

e7h2h2f2h2b8d8d8e7f7g8a6a6a7c8ele7e7e7e7h4a7d8b8d8elele7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e8e8e8flf2f2f6f6f6g2g8g8hih2h4h6

839840841842843844845846847848849850851852853854855856857858859860861862863864865866867868869870871872873874875876877878879880881882883884885886887888889

080908072306031410131808070616061313121212050707080708040711151534

*c*

d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4

d2clc5gla6d3a7a3g5d7e6a4d3d3e4f3f5g4f5f5f5g4e3e3e3e4e4a5ala5a5a4e4

d5d3d3d3d5c3c3e4g7f6f4b2dle5b6c5g6d5e3f4f6h2c5d5elg5d6a7c4c4e4clc7

b5b5b5b5b8c6c6c6c6c7c7d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d8e6e6e6e6f6f6

ZUGZWANGS in GBRThis list shows the

a2dldldlg4a3b2dlg3f2f2a3a3a3b2b2dlflf2f2f2g3h3h3h3h4h4a3a4a4a4a3b4

classsame 922

890891892893894895896897898899900901902903904905906907908909910911912913914915916917918919920921922

0014zug-

zwangs ordered by w K square withinB T M solution depthcolumnprevious

01010101010101

wKb2b3b3b3b3b3b3

is thelist.wBc3a2a2a2a2a2a2

serial

wSb7a3a3b4d4ele3

. The right-handnumber of the

bKa4alalalalalal

bSb3ele3a3a3a3a3

115139140129130131132

971

Page 36: eg102-2.pdf

010101010101010101010102020202020202020202020202020202030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303

b3b3b3b3c3c3c3c4c4c4c4a4a4b2b3b3b3b3b3b3b3c3c3c4c4c4c4a2a2a2a2a2a2a3a3a3a3a3a3a3b2b2b2b2b3b3b3b3b3b3b3

b2c2c4e2b3b3b3b4b4b4b4b4b4c4a2a2a2a2a3a3d4d3d3d4d4d4d4d2d2d2elelelb2b2d3d3d3d3d3e2flflfla3a3a3a3a3a3a3

fle4b8c3ala5a7a2a8blb7dld3a3blblc4c4a4c4c2d4d6dld3d5d7d3hih3flf5g2d4d4d4elglh2h4e3glg5h2a5b6c5d6ele3e5

blcla5cla3a3a3a4a4a4a4a2a2b4alalalalb5bld3a4a4a3a3a5a5a4a4a4a4a4a4blbla5a5a5a5a5b4b4b4b4blblblblblblbl

f3hib4b2e3e3c7e4c8b5b3blblclg2g4g2g4a2e4a4a3a3a4a4a4a4dldldldldldlglh4d2d2d2d2d2elelelelf6f6f6f6h4f6f6

244353146345547548524669645639637083084116141144142145337202356573574596597741742002004005008009010072075046047049050051118122123124257259260262319264265

030303030303030303030303030303030303040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404050505050505050505

b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4c3c3c4c4c4c4c4d4a2a3a3a3a4b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4b4c3c3c4c4c4c4d4a2a2a2a3a3a3a3a3a4

a3a7a7b6e2e3e3e3e3elf3f3clclc7c7d2a7f2e3e3e3d3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3b8f3e3e7c7g3c8c8dlh2a5c5d4d4e2e2e2f2g2b4

g5a8e8c6b5e4flhih5c4f4glhih3a8h7b5c3b3flhih5b5a6a8b7clc2c8f7f7c4gla3d7h7hih6h8f2a4a7e4c2d3f2f6g3f3d6b5

bld3d3d3blb5b5b5b5d3c5c5a4a4e4a4a4c6c3a5a5a5c5blblblblblblblblc5b5b2a6a3c5a4a4a5c6e6a4a4a4a5a5a5ala5c6

f6a6a6a6b2e2e2e2e2a4f2f2dldlb7d7f5b2ble2e2e2ale8e8e8f4e6e8d7e8a4f2h3b7d7g2d8d8cle2a3dldldld2d2d2fld2bl

266357358359150338339340341435579580647648827653693896014056057058113226227228246219229192231354342423400543582659660745792917001006007052053054038055114

972

Page 37: eg102-2.pdf

050505050505050505050505050505050505050505050505050505050506060606060606060606060606060606060606060606

b2b2b2b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4b4b4b4b4b4c3c3c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4d4d4d4a2a3a4a4a4b2b3b4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4

d5e4e4a3a3b4d6d6ele5a4c7d7e6f3f4c4d3d3d3c5d4d4d4h2h2d5e4g4d2d3b7b7b7e4d6c2c4c7d7d7f5f6f6a3b4b4c2c2c6d7

f4d2e3a7c5a2b5c6c2d7a3b5b6d8c5a3d6a7c7f2bla8c8f3b2e6c7e3h2e4e5a3a5b3a3c2c5a5c3c3c7c3c4c4b4b3d5a8c8e3e7

b4b4b4blblbld3d3cld3d3d3d4d4d6b2a4a4a4d5a4a5a5d6c6c6b4b3d6a4a5c3c3c4b4d3d5b6d4d4d4d2c2e2ble3e4a3a3a5a3

elelelc7f2b7a6a6dla6alb7a7a7b2flcla3a3a3c2a4a4a4cle2b8elg3dld2a7a7a7ela6b2clb7a7a7b6b7b7a4blbla4a4blc7

117120121168237158360362350363434437442445452416577571572588644739740813790793862854911003048110111112119361451425449443444433431453758821825594595744613

060606060606060606060607070707070707070707070707070707070707070707070707070707070707070708080808080808

c4c4c4c4c4d4d4d4d4d4d4a2a4b2b3b3b3b3b4b4b4b4c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4a4b2b3b3b4b4c3

d7d8flg4h2d3d3e4e4e6f3e4d4f4d7elf5f5c2c7e3h2d3e2b5b5c3c5c8e3flg4ald3d7d7e3e3e4e5e5e5glg8e3g4a3e3b5h4c4

f6g6b2b3f8c3e5c5g4c3c5a4g2b3c3d5c3c3a6blc5e6f8b4d3d4e2e6d4b5c5h2c4dlf4f8c5d5g5c3c4g5d3c3f3a3g2dld4a3e5

a3a4a5c2c6c6d6b4b4b4d6a4a6b4d3clclelc6d3d5b6d5c5e4e4c2c6e4c6a5c6e6d6b4b4d6d6d6b4b4b4b5a5a6b4blblf4b2c5

c7d7clglcla3a3elelf2b2eld3fla7dlb6b6b2b7ble2a3h2b8b8h5h3b4h3clg3a4a3e7e7h3h3h4e8e8e8dlf2d3gld5e4b8hih2

614658746778791895903864865879905Oil105125364351348367432436450427589584829830782799826800747798918902869870912913915874875876893842106126185207454422583

973

Page 38: eg102-2.pdf

0808OS080808080808080808080909090909090909090909090909090909090909090909090910101010101010101010101010

c3c4c4c4c4c4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4a2a2a4b2b2b3b3b3b3b4c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4d4d4a4b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4b4b4b4b4

d3c3c5d6e5h2a4c5d2d7d7e3e4b5f4e3e3g4a3e2e4f4e5c4e2c3c3c5d7e3e3e5e5e7glg4cld5d4a3a3e2e3e3f4f4a3a3a3a3c5

d2d5e4a8e7d8b2d3d5c3h7eld6blb3d2a3c3b2d5a4d3a5g5d4e7f4d2c3d5elb3d3c6b2h6d3d6g6flf3e3dlh6a6b7a4b5d5e4d4

a2a4g4a5c2b6d6b5b5b4b4d6d8c2a4a6b4b4blblb5blb6c5c5a4a4a5e3c6c6c2c2e4b7c2b5b4a2blblalblblblbla2a2a2a2b7

a3d7c8a6h5e2a3dla2a7g8h3h4b8flclh3glf2b2h4e4h5glh2b8f8c2c7h3h3h5h5b7clg5dld8d5e4e4b2b5g7e4e4dldldldlgl

457650835743785768901892890860885914916013012104128127235151343215429581585640698750822801802783784828769780891863092204205134156302213214381382383384430

101010101010101011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111212121212121212121212121212121212121212

c4c4c4c4c4d4d4d4a3a3a4b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3c3c3c3c4c4c4c4d4d4d4a3a4b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4c3c4c4c4c4c4c4c4d4

c7d2d2d6e4d7f5g5f4f4c5a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3e3c2d2d2a4c2dle8a5d7e8e3d4a3a3a3a3a3b4e3e3c4c2clc3d4d6d8f3g4b5

h5a7c7gle3h4e3g7a6b7d4d4elelelglh2h2h4h4f5e3a7c7b5f4c3b5c4e5h4f5f8b5c6e6e6h3e2flh5e7f5c8a8f5alc6b7d8h4

a4a4a4d2b2b4b4c6alala6blblblblblblblblblbla3a3a3d2a3e5d2e6b4a3ala2blblblblblblblbld4a3a5a4d2a4a4b6c2b3

d7g7g7a7b8e7f6g3e4e4glg3f2f6g5g3f6g5f6g5e4b6g7g7a6c7cla6a4h4e7e4c7e2hihih5h5e4e4e4a7c8c2d7a4eld7a2g5e7

652726727807762871881898029030107276239263292278267294268295209520563564804609831806919888839027089198307310328331206208212441527749649803662655767779855

974

Page 39: eg102-2.pdf

121212121212121313131313131313131313131313131313131313131313131313141414141414141414141414141414141414

d4d4d4d4d4d4d4a3a3a3a4a4b3b3b3b4b4c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4d4d4d4d4d4d4b3b3b3b3b3c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4

d5d5ele6f5f5f5b2b4e3d4d8a3b4f4g6h2d2d2clc5d7d7d7d8d8f6d7d7d7f5f5g4a3a3a3elf4c6elc3c3dldld2d2d2d8d8f4f5

c3d6d5c3e3f4f6d4e2flh7b3d6f4c2d2b2b5b5a7g6a3c8e8d4d4b3e3e5f6e7g6d5b7f7h7g2d7e3b5c7e6blb5a7c2g2f3f3f8e3

b4b4b3b4d6d6d6blalala2a2blbldlb2b6a2a2a5c6d2c2c2a4a4c2b4b4c7b4d6d6blblblclbla3a2a4e4d6f6a4a4a4a4b2c2c6

d8h2a6f6f2f2f2e7e4e4a8a6g3f6b5d6clb6e7alg2a6b7b7b8f8c6e7e7f2f6dlflhihie8dle4d6f5f8a6clcle7e2e2d7d7h8f2

861887850880908909910070024026082081277269355406426468484738796805111773643700774867868899882906907306312233352216535495695824814833674664665656763788794

141414141415151515151515151515151516161616161616161616161616161616161616161617171717171717171717171717

c4d4d4d4d4a3a4b3c3c3c4c4c4c4d4d4d4b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4c3c3c3c3c4c4c4c4d4d4d4d4a4b3b3b3b3b4b4b4c3c3c3c3c3

f5a3d7e6e6f4f4a3b2elc3d7g4g5a4a5e8a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3c7ele7f3b2dld7f2d5e4e4e7a3a3a3b2b2a3a3ela6b2clclel

f6e4g4blbld7d3a7d3c7e2g2d7g2cle4d6b7c6c6c8c8e8f5f7d4h5b5d5dlh5d2a4g2c3b6d3d3e2b8e7c6c6c5e3d3b2e2a3e3a7

c6c6b4b4b4ala2bla2a2a4d2d6c2f6e6b4blblblblblblblbla2a3a2a2a5a4e5e3a6a3d6b3b3a2blblblbla2a2a2a3a2a2a2a2

f2dlg8flhie4g4f4b3g7g6c7a2h5a3a4h6h5e6h5hih5hih5h5ald7g4e6fle2cla8e2h2b2e7a6c6d8c7c7f8f2b6bla7b3a7e7e7

795897884877886032101245465510721810812786921920889323220324308325311329330368542503481578663832820755840904856851087193170172270388377375518466461482509

975

Page 40: eg102-2.pdf

171717171717171818181818181818181818181818181818181818181919191919191919191919191919202020202020202020

c4c4c4c4c4c4d4a3a4a4a4a4a4b3b3b4b4b4c3c3c4c4c4c4c4d4d4d4b3c3c3c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4d4a4b3c3c3c3c4c4c4c4

c3dldldld7g3d5b4a3a3a3a3a3a3c3a3a3clb2d8b4c6dld7e7d5d7e6b2a5a6a6b2b4c3c3d4d4d8d8d8

LA

I

a3a3cld4d8c3c3c5dl

b5flflf3c5f4f4c3c5elf4glg3

c4e6f5a3glg6h5g7h4b7c6a2h8f4a7b6b4e5g3g3d6f6c6d3a5a7f7c5b5e6c8c6e7d5e8b7g6

a4d6f6d6e3c2a5alalbla2a2a2blcla2a2a2a2a3c2a5d7d2a4a4b4c7bla3a4a4a2bla4a4a4a4a4a4a4b4a2bla2a3a3a4a4a4d6

g6clclclc7c7h2c5f2f7d8d8d8e8c2h3c8g2ald7e8glclc7e6h2e7f2c2a6a5a5ale8f4h2d7a8b8b8d7g2c6e2c6d7b8g6g6g2cl

717815834816823775843017079109096097098232349395380391455545776751818809673841872900161517575576456759691730654636641642657883086199472544523720722706817

202020212121212121212121212121212121222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222323232323

c4c4c4a3a3a3a4a4b3b3b4c3c3c3c3c3c4c4b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4b4b4b4c3c3c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4d4d4a3b3b3b3b3

d4d7g4e3e3e3a3a3a3a3f5clc2c2c5f6c3f8a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a4a4a4f8b2b8c2f5c2c3c3c3c3c5f8g5e4g7b2a3a3a3a3

a7a5h8d4d4d4c7d6g2g5f6c2f5g4g3c2e3f3b6b7c8e3e8f5f6f7f 7h4f7g4g6f3c6b2b4f6e5a8c2d3f5b7h4g6f4b7elh6h6h6h7

a3a3c2blblbla2a2blblb6a2a3a3a2a2a4c2blblblblblblblblblbld4d4d4b2a2a3a3c7a3a4a4a4a4a4c2c6b2a2blblblblbl

d7c7

a6d7e4d8d8d3g3f2c6b7d7f4c6f8f7f2d5d5f2d5e6f2d5g4f2alalalf7b3c8f6f2b7g6g6f3g6f5h8g2e7g8h4c7d8g7hi

616612781061067068094095176279428471522540490473696777236180181240183221241184291243438439440419464526557586605716718684723692789797847838076171194301313

976

Page 41: eg102-2.pdf

232323232323232323232323232323232323232324242424242424242424242525252525252525252525252526262626262626

b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4b4b4c3c3c3c3c3c3c4c4d4d4a4b3b3b3b3b4b4c3c4c4d4a3a4a4b3b3b3b3b4c3c3c4d4d4a3b3b3b3b3b3b3

a3b2b2b2b4elf5a5a5a5c2c2c5d8e5g5c3e3a6c2cla3a5a5f4e5h7f2d8g5dlf4cld4b2f4f4f4e5c4c5c7d7h3f4a3a3a3a3a3a3

h8f5f5f5e3f2f6f2g3g5d3d3d2b2c2g6c8d8d5f4e2d7g3g5e6d5f2d2d2dlb4e6d4d3b6f8f8f8e3b6glbld2e5f8a6a6a8a8b5b7

blblblblclblb7d4d4d4a3a3a2a3a2c7a4a5b8b4a2bld3d3bla2b2a2b2a2b2ala2a2blblblbla2a3a2a4b2b3alblblblblblbl

b6c7d8f8b6e5f2a8a8a8g8h7f4c8clg2g6h7g4f2d5e8a8a8f5blh6g2b8b3b8f5e7h7c2e7g7h4a3f4f4e4d8h4e7dld5dld5e4d7

157173196271347217344446447448565570488529469587719753894878091230365366256376424501761590844040099102162224303320370555489670846859036174178175179201190

262626262626262626262627272727272727272727272727272727272727272727272727272727272828282828282828282828

b3b3b3b3b3b3b3c4c4c4c4a3a4a4b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b4b4b4b4c3c3c3c3c4c4a3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3b3

a3a3a3a3a3b2g3c3c3d4e5elclc5a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3b2b2e5e5e5e5e6b2b2c5e5e4g7f4a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3

b7c8c8e6e8e5d5blflb7c6b4d4d3a7a7a7a7b8c5c7c7c7d8d8f8f8c8f4b6c7e7f6d6glg3hic4f4b7f8a6a6a6a6a6a8a8a8a8a8

blblblblblblbla4a4a4a4bla2a2blblblblblblblblblblblblblblblbla2a2a2a6a2a2a2a2a4a4alblblblblblblblblblbl

g4d7g4f5g4c2h3f3h7e7e2a5c7c2f2f6glg3c7g3f2f6g3g7h6g7h6b8c2e3a3a3a3b6a5a5g2a7a7c8h4d7g4hih3h5d7g4hih3h5

287191288255290163317680736675666060088085234258272273169274238261275299335300336160164200369371372398459460500462635646044188285304314321189286305315322

977

Page 42: eg102-2.pdf

vo

^v

Ov

o<

x>

00

PO

Q^

^^

^^

^^

^i

i^

o^

p&

jp

&j

pp

p

Q-O

Q

»» O

O

* O

- C

L O

* C3

* ^

CTQ

OQ

D

- CL

CL

D-

D-

O

P P

P P

a'a

-crc

ra-c

rcrc

T'c

ra-

CLCT

Q O

Q 5

* s

r «

o1«

a «

arc

ucr<

T>CT

QCTQ

a'c

ra*

^ o

o-o

-sr

trap

a.

tr

r+>

^0

OO

O0

jj

0N

4t

OO

00

00

K)

Ui

hJbs

JtO

bO

po

.o

on

oo

oa

^a

'a

'c

ro

on

oo

oo

on

cr

on

oo

oo

oo

oc

j'

oo

no

no

cr

cr

a'

cr

D-

oo

nn

oo

oo

Qu

P

< D

-D

-^

^C

l.

^'

^D

-C

LC

TP

C

L |+

)(T

Q

OQ

CT

OQ

c

r P

OQ O

Q a

* O

*OQ

OQ

OQ

a* c

r o

OQ

C

LP

r

D

CD r

o

CL

OO

OO

Q

cr

^

Page 43: eg102-2.pdf

353535353535353535353535353636363636363636363636373737373737373738383838383838383838383839393939393939

a3b3b3c3c3c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4a3b3b4c3c3c4c4c4c4c4c4b3b4c4c4c4c4c4c4a3a3a3a4c3c4c4c4c4c4c4c4a3b3b3c4c4c4c4

f4e3e3c2e3e5e7c3d4e5f4f6h2e3a3a3e5e5c3c3c3c3e4f4b7a3clc3c3c3c3c7dldle3g7e5alc3c3c3c3c3c3dldle2b4b4c3c3

d3h3h3h5a8e6f7d3g6b2e3dla8h3h3d6b6b6b4b5b5d6cld5b2f5b7d6e8f5na5c5f2h3d4b2c3b7c8e8f5f7g3b2f2g5e8f5a7a7

alblbla3a2a2a2a3e2a3b2a3a5albla2a2a2a3a2a4a4a4a3cla2a4a3a4a4a4a6blblala2a2a3a4a4a4a4a4a4blblala4a4a3a4

e4e4h5h3f3c8g4e6d7e6f3g6clh5eld2e7h4c7f3f7g5e7f3b4fle6f3e6h7g6clclcle4c7h6f8f3f3f3f3f3g5cla2b2glg5f3gl

031211333566486475504617819618765627748045197385485513610593694713676623346387671622672737724754065066028090516624681682687688689715064148137701711620702

393939393939394040404040404040404040404040414141414141414141424242434343444444444545454646464747474748

c4c4c4c4c4c4d4a3b3b4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4c4a3b4c3c3c3c3c4d4d4c3c4d4b4c3c4c3c4c4d4a3c4c4c3c3c3b3b3b3b4a3

c3c3c3c3c3dld7b3g4e5c3c3c3c3c3c3c3dldldld4dle5c2c2c2f8c3d7e8c2dle8b3b3c7e8e8h5a4b3e8f8b5d7d7e2g4h7c6g4

c2c7c7c7h6e5a5a2a2c4a6a8b7c8d5e6e8a4d7d7b7a2b6b4e7f6dle7ele3d3g5c4hic5dldld6c5g4b4e4a4flf6g3b6c7d3a3c7

a4a3a4a4a4a3b2blbla2a4a4a3a3a4a4a3a3a3a3a4bla2a3a3a3a2a4b4b3a3a3b3bla3a4a2a3b2b2bla3a2a2a3a3alblblb2al

g8f3glg5h4b4d8f8g3h6f3f3h2h2f3f3h2a8a6a8h4h2g8g5d8g7f5f8e7e7h5c7c8h2flg4a3e7g5g8b2g8d8b3d6d6b2f4g3b6f4

728621703.712733604845071283396678679630631685686632599598600734074394559546562497697866858568611853401553710458619766849062629592467538539133252284402039

979

Page 44: eg102-2.pdf

^W

WW

WW

bO

tJ

tO

K)

OO

O^

V0

^^

ac

ja

P^

pc

Ta

Pa

cj

PP

PP

o- o

- £

^ u

>a

^o

o ^O

Q p

a

cr

cr

cr

a

D-O

QO

O^

CL n»

OQ P

trap

« a

ro-p

^o

-crn

> o

-

tO^

a\^

°5O

tra>

g-o

CLP

CLCT

Q

PP

a-P

PP

pp

pp

po

-c

r'a

'PP

PP

PP

PP

PP

cT

ar

'PP

PP

PP

a-a

'c7

*c

rc

r'P

PP

op

pc

Tc

rp

pp

a-

o- o

tr

OQ

trc

FQ C

TOQ

CL

P C

L^

^O

Q

O C

LO

a^

o

STO

P a>

OT

^O

CF

Q

a-o

r-b

p

n> *

+>

<jr

(jQ

C

TP

t

rt

^ C

LOQ

^

OQ

a> o

Page 45: eg102-2.pdf

DIAGRAMS AND SOLUTIONS

No. 8179Gerchen-Gubanov (iv-vi.79)1st Prize, Themes-64, 1978-179

award: x-xii.80

Draw 4 + 5

No.8179: Gerchen-Gubanov(USSR). Judge: Yohanan Afek(Israel). The composer is otherwiseunknown. We have been unable totrace a final award. l.Se4Bxe4 + 2.Kxe4 Sc5+ 3.Kd5 Sf4 +4.Kc4 Bal 5.h8Q/i Bxh8 6.Bd7 +Sxd7 stalemate.i) 5.Bd7 + ? Sxd7 6.h8Q Sb6 + wins.'A typical passage of arms withminor pieces leads to a charmingmodel stalemate. Charming!

Rxf2 4.Rxf2 Rel+ 5.Kd5 Rdl + /i6.Kc6 alQ 7.Rf8+ Ka7 8.Ra5 +Qxa5 9.Ra8 + Kxa8 stalemate,i) alQ 6.Rf8+ Kb7 7.Rf7 + Kb68.Rc6 + Kb5 9.Rb7+ draw.'In his endeavours to escape a net ofperpetual checks Bl delays promo-ting with the aim of making an inter-mediate check - and having done sofinds that he has constructed a sur-prising stalemate net for his oppo-nent!

No. 8181 G. Zakhodyakin (i-iii.79)3rd Prize, Themes-64, 1978-79

Draw

No. 8180 D. Gurgenidze andG.A. Nadareishvili (x-xii.79)

2nd Prize, Themes-64, 1978-79

4 + 5

No.8181: G.Zakhodyakin (USSR).l.Sa3+ Kd2 2.Rd5 + Ke2 3.Re5 +Kf2 4.Rf5 + Kg2 5.Rb5 hlQ 6.RblQh5 7.Rb2 + Kf3 8.Rb3 + Ke49.Rb4 + drawn.'This version of an idea ofKozlowski's (Swiat Szachowy, 1932)has a superior introduction and asto-nishing economy. It leads in the mostnatural way to the central idea!There is a Zakhodyakin versiondated 1947, but the present miniatureis perfect. See EG18 p45, K12.

No.8180: D.Gurgenidze and No.8182: Eduard Asaba (Moscow).G.A.Nadareishvili (Georgian SSR). I.c7/i Rh7 + 2.Kg6 (Kxh7?l.Rc5 + Kb8 2.Rxe2 Rf7+ 3.Ke4 Rxd7 + ;)Rg7 + 3.Kf6 Rf7 + 4.Kxe6

981

Page 46: eg102-2.pdf

fRxd7 5.Bf6 + /ii Ke4 6.Sf2 + Kf47.Sh3 + /iii Ke4 8.Sg5 + Kf4 9.Be5 +Rxe5 + 10.Kxd7Rd5+ ll.Ke7wins.i) l.Bxb6 + ? Kxd3 2.c7 Rf6 + 3.Kg7Rxd7 + 4.Kxf6 Rxd7 5.Bxd7 Kc2draw. l.Sb4? R5xd7 2.cd Rxd73.Bxb6 + Kc4 4.Sc2 Kc3 draw,ii) 5.c8Q? Rxd8 6.Qc2 R8d6+, withperpetual check.iii) 7.Be5 + ? Rxe5 + 8.Kxd7 Rd5 +9.Ke6 Re5+ 10.Kd6 Re8. 7.Bg5 + ?Kxg5 8.c8Q R7d6+ 9.Ke7 Rd7 +10.Qxd7Rxd7-f- H.Kxd7Kf412.Kc6Ke3.'BPs heroic fight to stop promotioncomes up against a clever manoeuvreby the pair of W pieces having thetask of stopping the perpetual check!Or mate!

No. 8182 E. Asaba (x-xii.79)1. Hon. Mention,

Themes-64, 1978-79

No. 8183 A. Maksimovskikh andYu. Makletsov (iv-vi.79)

2 Hon. Mention, Themes-64,1978-79

No.8183: A.Maksimovskikh andYu.Shupletsov (USSR). l.a8Q + /iKxa8 2.Kc7 Qd6+ 3.Kxd6 Kb74.f8Q hlQ 5.Qa8 + Kxa8 6.Kc7Qh2 + 7.d6 Qxd6+ 8.Kxd6 Kb79.h7 b2 10.h8Q blQ ll.Qa8 + Kxa812.Kc7 wins.i) l.fSQ? Qg5 + draws, l.dc + ? Qxc6draws.'I have always liked it when bothsides sacrifice the same piece type -the effect of this splendid idea isenhanced when the piece is the Q.But there petition of the same criticalsquares is a little mechanical! Cf.Korolkov and Mitrofanov (1957),No.l2 82in'1357\

No. 8184 E. Pogosyants (i-iii.79)1 Comm., Themes-64,

1978-79

No.8184: Ernest Pogosyants. l.Kd8/i, with: Rb6 2.c8S/ii Rxb8 (Rb7;Bd6) 3.Bc6+ Rb7 4.Sd6 wins, orRg8+ 2.Be8 Rh8 3.Ba7/iii (c8Q?Rxe8 + ;) Kxa7 4.c8Q wins,i) l.Be6? Rxe6/iv 2.Kd7 Rc6 3.Kxc6stalemate.ii) 2.Ba7 + ? Kxa7 3.c8Q Rb8 draw,iii) 3.c8Q? Rxe8 + . 3.c8R? Kb64.Kd7 Rh7 + 5.Kd8 Rh8 6.Kd7Rh7+ draw.iv) Rg8 + ; is given a '? ' because of3.Kd7, but it draws too: Rxb84.Bd5 + Ka7.'Efficacious promotion in a minia-ture, whose main merit lies in thepositional draw after 3.c8R? Kb7!The 0410 data base (which the com-poser never experienced) confirmsthe draw after 4.R- Kxb8.

982

Page 47: eg102-2.pdf

B5 M. Zinar(iv2 Comm.,

Themes-64, 1978-79

Draw 5 + 4

No.8185: M.Zinar (USSR). l.Kb7 d52.b4 + Kxb4 (Kxa4; Kc6) 3.Kb6 d44.a5 d3 5.a6 d2 6.a7 dlQ 7.a8QQd6 + /i 8.Qc6/ii Qxc6 + 9.Kxc6Kc4 10.Kd6(d7) Kd4, and the secondphase starts, ll.Ke6 Ke3 12.Kf5 g313.Kg4 Kf2 14.Kh3 h5 stalemate,i) Otherwise there is no forced Q-ec-xhange.ii) On other moves the subsequentQ-swap wins for Bl, for example:8.Ka7? Qc5 + ,and a8 becomes theexchanging-off square.'This is the best of the article's (inThemes-64 in 1979) interestingendeavours to synthesise classicthemes into P-studies!

No. 8186 P. .loit-lst Prize, Schwei/erischeSchachzeitung 1981-1982

award: vi.83

No.8186: P.Joitsa (Romania).Judge: A.J.Roycroft. l.Sh6 + /i

Kf4/ii 2.Bg3 + Kg5/iii 3.Sf5 Rd2 +4.Kh3Rxg6 5.Sh4,with:Rf6 6.Sf3 + Rxf3 pin stalemate, orRh6 6.Bf4 + Kxf4 pin stalemate,i) l.Se7? Rd2+ 2.Kgl Kxh4 3.Sf5 +Kg5 4.Sxg7 Kxg6 5.Se6 Kf5 6.Sc5Rd5 7.Sb3 Rd 38.Sc5 Rc3 9.Sa4 Rc2wins.ii) Kf3 2.Bh5 + Ke4 3.Sg4 draw,iii) Kf3 3.Sf5 Rd2 + 4.Kh3 Rxg65.Sh4 + draw.'The whole impact is in the finalecho, which happens so quickly thatit might even be overlooked: wBsacrifices for a stalemate where bS ispinned, and wS sacrifices for a stale-mate where wB is pinned. This logi-cal symmetry occurs in pure, paw-nless form, and all pieces move.True, to be a top class study some-thing additional is desirable, butthere should be no complaints aboutthis placing! An earlier version (withwKg2) provisionally took 1st Prize inthe Mandil MT (1979-80) award (seeEG71 for the final), but this allowedthe fatal dual draw 4.Kf3 in the main-line.'In making his award the judge hasrestricted his activities to the twin-functions of (a) identifying anticipa-tions, and (b) ranking. He has nottested the studies for soundness,believing that this is not the primeresponsibility of a judge ~ althoughsome talented judges nobly acceptthis burdensome additional chore.He acknowledges his debt to SSZ sol-vers.'Just 17 studies remained after theefforts of SSZ solvers had revealed anumber of unsoundnesses, and aftera few others had also been eliminatedfor reasons of duals or relatively lowinterest value, this latter criterionmeaning clearly anticipated or of tri-vial content in the context of aninternational tourney.Using scissors and paste, the judgeconcocted a 'scroll' of all 17 dia-grams and solutions and comments

983

Page 48: eg102-2.pdf

published in the column, and carriedit about with him for a fortnight.The result of this familiarisationexercise follows. There is much toenjoy in the studies honoured!

No.8188: C.M.Bent (Newbury).l.Sd3 (Kxc2? Sf4;) clQ+ 2.Sxcl Sf43.Se2 Sxg2 4.Bd5 Kh3 5.Sgl + Kh26.Sf3 + Kh3 (KM; Sh4) 7.Be6 mate.'Economy, surprise, neatness, and acheckmate!

S. Tkachenko ( \ . 8 I )= 2/3 Prizes,SSZ 1981-82

No. 8189 Em. Dobrescu1 Hon. Mention,

SSZ 1981-82

Draw 4 + 3

No.8187: S.Tkachenko (USSR).l.Bf4+ Ka8/i2.Sc7 + (Kc6?Rg6 + )Kb7 3.Sd5/ii b24.Sc3 Rcl 5.SblRxbl 6.Be5 Rel 7.Bxb2 Rbl 8.Ka5Rxb2 stalemate.i) Kc8 2.Sd6 and 3.Sc4. Ka7 2.Be3 +and3.Bd4.ii) 3.Be5? Rg5 4.Kc4 Rxe5 5.Sb5Rxb5 wins.'A single-line miniature of decepti-vely simple construction and Platov-like conclusion!

Win

No.8189: Em.Dobrescu (Bucharest).l.Rf5/i Rf8/ii 2.Ra3 g4 3.Ra4 Kh7(Kg8; or f4) 4.aRf4/iii Kg8 5.Kb6/ivRb8 + 6.Kc7 Rf8 7.Kd6 Rd8 +8.Ke7 Re8+ 9.Kd7 Rf8 10.Kc7 Ra8H.Kb7Rf812.Ka7wins.i)l.Rd7?Rf8 2.Ra5Bxh5.ii)Be6 2.Re5Re8 3.aRel.iii) 4.Rd4? g6 5.hg Kxg6 6.fRf4 h5.4.Rxg4? Be6 5.Rxf8 Bxg4.iv) 5.Ka6? Bc4 + . 5.Kb7? Bd5 + .'Probably the most original entry,but the pin on the f-file is somewhatheavy, taking away from theundoubted wit of wK's zugzwang-created duel with bR!

No.8188 No. 8190 Gh.A. Umnov2 Hon. Mention,

SSZ 1981-82

Win

984

Page 49: eg102-2.pdf

No.8190: Gh.A.Umnov (USSR).l.Rh7 + Bg7 (Kd8; Rxc6) 2.hRxg7 +Kc8/i 3.a8Q + Qxa8 4.Rg8 + Kb75.R8g7+ Kb8 6.Rg8 + Ka77.Rxa8 + Kxa8 8.Rb6 Ka7 9.Rb5Ka8 10.Rb6 Ra7 ll.Rb5 R5a612.Rb6, positional draw.i) Kd8 3.Rxc6 Rxc6 4.a8Q + Rxa85.Rg8+.'An unsatisfactory introduction, butthe infinite wR offers in the finalecannot be denied their humour andcharm!

No. 8191 W. Naef3 Hon. Mention,

SSZ 1981-82

Draw

No.8191: W.Naef (Switzerland).l.Sc6+ Kxa4 2.Sc5 + (Sb6 + ?Kb5;)Kb5 (Ka3; Sxb3)3.Sxb3 Kxc6 4.Scld2 (Se5; Kd2) 5.Sb3 Bf4 6.Sd4 +(Ke2? Kd5;) Sxd4 stalemate.'Well constructed stalemate, ifsomewhat familiar. "Each of thenext 3 studies adds something to analready known field!

No.8192: Gh.A.Umnov. I.b7 Sa6/i2.Rc6 + /ii Kg5 3.Rxa6 Rbl 4.Ra7Kf5 5.Kc2 Rb6 6.Kc3 Ke5 7.Kc4 Kd68.Ra6 wins.i) Rh2 + 2.Kc3 Rc2 + 3.Kb3 Rxc54.b8Q, with material loss for Bl.ii) 'Solvers found an alternative:2.Ra5 Sb8 (Rbl; Rxa6 + ) 3.Ra8!Was this eliminated?

No. 8193 Corvan Wijgerden(ix.81)Commended,SSZ 1981-82

Win 5 + 4

No.8193: Cor van Wijgerden (Ne-therlands). I.c6/i Rxd6/ii 2.Kb6 Re63.Kb7 Re7 + 4.c7 Ke6 5.Kb8 Re8 +(Kd6; Sc8 +) 6.c8R Re7 7.Rc6 + Kf78.Rf7 wins.i) l.Kb6? Ke6 2.Kc6 Rh6 3.Kb7 Rh4,and if 4.Be5 Rxg4 5.c6 Rgl 6.c7Rbl + , or if 4.Bf8 Rxg4 5.c6 Rxd4.Anticipation: Kamensky, 1HMChervony Girnik, 1967. EG19.1020(with wPd3, not bPd3).

o. 8194 Gh.A.Umnov (x.81)Commended,

Schweizerische Schachzeitung,1981-82

Draw

985

Page 50: eg102-2.pdf

No.8194: Gh.A.Umnov. l.Kc2 Sf22.Rf3 Ral 3.Kb2 Rfl 4.Kc2/i Sg55.Ra3+ Kb7 6.Rb3 + Kc6 7.Rbldraw.i)4.Ra3 + ?Kb7 5.RalSd3 + .

No. 8195 B. Neuenschwander (\ii.81)Special Prize,

Schweizerische Schachzeitung,1981-82

ment, both as it happens by BeatNeuenschwander. My personal opi-nion is that composition prizesshould not be awarded for difficultyof solution, but there is no doubtthat if such a prize were to be awar-ded it would go to No.8196. ... Theingenious introduction is a solutionon its own, but artistically it is notrelated to the quite incredible mainline contortions.

No.8195: seems to be different: It is asplendid introduction to the field ofretroanalysis in the study, for it hasmany of the latter 's standard compo-nents without the drawbacks oflengthy justifying variations!

No.8195: Beat Neuenschwander(Switzerland), l.fg hg+ 2.Kxg6 flQ3.Qg7 4- Sxg7 4.hg mate. The en pas-sant capture can be demonstrated tobe legal by considering all of Bl'spossible alternatives to g7-g5; on hismove to create the diagram.d7-d6; is ruled out by bSg8, whichcannot be the result of a promotion,and f6xe5; implies that Bl has made 6captures, which is ruled out becausewBB,since they move on light anddark squares, cannot both have beencaptured by bPP.'The wealth of possibilities offeredby the studies genre can make a moc-kery of a straightforward tourneyaward. Judges have long recognisedthis fact, and have developed the cus-tom of awarding 'Special' prizes,'Special' honourable mentions, and'Special' commendations - and evenplacing together special sectionsaltogether, for instance of 'minia-tures' (maximum of 7 men on theboard), although the tourneyannouncement may have made nomention of such separation. In thepresent tourney two studies standout as candidates for special treat-

No. 8196 B. Neuenschwander (iii.81)Schweizerische Schachzeitung

1981

No.8196: Beat Neuenschwander. Lf7(Bd6? Sxh3;) Rf4 (Sg4; Bd6) 2.f8QRxf8 3.Bxf8 Sg4 (else wBxc5) 4.Bd6(hg? hg;) Sh2 + /i 5.Bxh2 h4 6.Bbl/iiKxh2 7.Rd2 Khl 8.Rc2/iii Kh29.Rb2 Khl 10.Bc2/iv Kh2 ll.Rbl Khl12.Ral Kh2 13.Bbl Khl 14.Rdl Kh215.Rd2 Khl (Kxh3;K gl) 16.Kel Kg2/v 17.Kdl Kf2/vi 18.Kc2 Kel 19.Rdl +

•Kf2 2O.Rhl Kg2 21.Rel Kf2 22.KdlKg2 23.Bc2/vii Kf2 24.Rbl Kg225.Rb2 Kf2 26.Bbl Kg2/viii 27.Rc2/ix Kf2 28.Rd2 Kg2 29.Kc2 Kf23O.dRdl and W wins,i) Sh6 5.Rd2 Sf5 6.Bf4 h4 7.eRdlwins.

986

Page 51: eg102-2.pdf

ii) Here and elsewhere some moveinversion is possible: 6.Rd2.iii) See (v) for 8.Rb2? iv) wR mustplay to al. Not so doing might leadto: lO.Rdl Kh2 ll.Rld2 Khl 12.KelKg2 13.Kdl Kxh3 14.Kc2 ed 15.e4(Kxd2,ab;) de 16.Se2 Kg2 17.Kdl ab18.d4h319.Sf4 + Kfl20.Rd3+ e2 +21.Bxe2 + (Sxe2,h2;)Kf2 22.Sxh3 +Ke3 and it is Bl who wins,v) Had W played 8.Rb2? then bKwould now stand on h2 and therewould follow Kxh3 17.Kdl Kg218.Kc2 ed 19.Kxd2 h3 2O.e4 h2 andW is one tempo too late,vi) But now W is in time: Kxh318.Kc2 ed 19.Kxd2 Kg2 2O.e4 h321.Se2h2 22.Bc2wins.vii) And now wRal can be reawoken.viii) ab 27.a4 bcQ + 28.Kxcl Kxel29.Bc2 Kxe2 3O.a5 Kfl 31.Bdl wins,ix) 27.Rd2 Kf2 28.Kc2? Kxel since Whas not enough to win with.Among the last to be reluctantly dis-carded from the honours list were thenext three.

No. 8197 E. MelnichenkoSchweizerische Schachzeitung

1981

No. 8198SSZ 1982

Win 7 + 7

No.8197: Emil Melnichenko (NewZealand). I.d6 Qc8 2.Re8 Kf2 3.BdlKfl 4.Bf3 Kf2 5.Be2 Kg3 6.Rf8 Kg27.Bg4 Kg3 8.Bf3 Kh4 9.Rg8 Kh310.Bh5 Kh2 (Kh4; Bg4) ll.Bg4 Khl12.Bf3 + Kh213.Bg2wins.This was an improvement on an ear-lier effort in SSZ.

No.8198: T.Amirov (USSR). I.a7Re3 + (Re8; Rb8) 2.Kc2 (Kd2? Ra3;)Re2 + (Ra3; Rb3 + ) 3.Kbl Rel +4.Ka2 Re8 5.Rb8 Re2 + 6.Ka3 Re3 +7.Rb3 wins.

No. 8199 R. Knobel

No.8199: R.Knobel (Switzerland).l.Qc3 Qc4 for stalemate) 2.Qxc4b2 + 3.Kd2 blQ 4.Qc5 + Kb35.Qb+ Ka2 6.Sc3 + wins.

No.8200: M.Gromov (Vladimir).Judge: Anatoly G.Kuznetsov. l.BblKe4 2.Sg4/i Kd4 3.Sc6 + Kc3/ii4.Sf2 Rd5/iii 5.Bg6/iv Kc4 6.Se4/vKb5 7.Sc3 + Kxc6 8.Be4 wins.i) 2.Sfl? Kd4 3.Sc6 + Kc3 and it's adraw.ii) Kc44.()Se5 +., or Ke44.Sf2+ . Weleave the reader to count the forks inthe variations of this fine study.

987

Page 52: eg102-2.pdf

iii) Alternatives lead to S-forks eitherat once or after an intervening move,iv) This very quiet move completelytames bR.v) The third domination, the firstbeing after 4.Sf2.

N o . 8200 M. Gromov (iii.87)1st Prize, Shakhmaty

v SSSR, 1987award: iv.90

No. 8202 V. Anufriev (iii.87)3rd Prize, Shakhmaty

v SSSR, 1987

Win

201 D. Gurgenidze andL. Mitrofanov (viii.87)

2nd Prize, Shakhmatyv SSSR, 1987

No.8201: David Gurgenidze (Geor-gian SSR) and Leopold Mitrofanov(Leningrad).I.a6 Ral/i 2.Bgl + /ii Rxgl/iii3.Kh6/iv Rhl+ (Rfl; Kg8) 4.Kg8/vRdl 5.a7 Rgl + 6.Kf8 Rfl+ 7.Ke8winning.i) Rf8 2.a7 Ke4 3.d7 Rd8 4.Bc7Rxd7+ 5.Kg6.ii) 2.a7? Rxa7+. 2.d7? Rdl 3.a7Rxd7 + andRxa7.iii)Ke4 3.a7and4.d7.iv) Now there is no way bR can reachhis home rank.iv)4.Kg7?Rdl5.a7Ral.

Win 5 + 6

No.8202: V.Anufriev (Tula). l.Kb7Rf3/i 2.d3/ii Rxd3 3.Rgl (Rhl?Kf8;) Rc7 + /iii 4.Kb6/iv Rc6 +5.Kb5 Rc5 + 6.Kxc5 clQ + 7.RxclRxa3 8.Kb4 Ra8 9.Rhl Rb8 +10.Kc5 Kd8 ll.Kc6 Rc8+ 12.Kb7Rc7 + 13.Kb6wins.i) Rd8 2.Ra8, 3.Rxd8 + and mates.Kd8 2.Rc3 wins.ii) 2.Rhl? clQ 3.Rxcl Rb3 + 4.Rxb3Rxcl.iii) Kf8 4.Rxd3 clQ 5.Rf3+ Ke86.Rg8 mate.iv) 4.Kxc7? clQ + 5.Rxcl Rxa3.

No. 8203 V. Yakovenko (xi.87)4th Prize, Shakhmaty

v SSSR, 1987

No.8203: V.Yakovenko (Donetsk).l.Bg4 + Kc6/i 2.d7 Kc7 3.Sg5 (Sc5?Bf7;) Bbl/ii 4.d8Q + (Sf7? Bf6;)Kxd8 5.Sf7 + Ke7 6.Sxh8 Kf6 7.Bh5Ba2/iii 8.Be8/iv Bb3 + 9.Kel/v Bc210.Bb5/vi Kg7 ll.Bd3 Bxd3 12.edKxh8 13.Ke2 Kg7 14.Kxe3 wins.

988

Page 53: eg102-2.pdf

i) Kd8 2.Sc5 Be8 3.Sb7 mate.ii) There was the threat 4.Se6+ Kxd75.Sf4(f8)+ and6.Sxg6.iii) For Kg7 9.Sg6 Kh6 10.Sf4 Kg5.iv) 8.Kc2? Kg7 9.Sf7 Bxf7 10.Bxf7Kxf7 ll.Kd3 Ke6 12.Kxe3 Ke5.v) 9.Kcl? Bc4 lO.Kdl Bb3 + is nomore than repetition.vi) 10.Bh5? Bb3. Bl was threateningthe symmetry-based continuationKg711.Sf7Kf812.Sd6Ke7.

No. 8205 P. Arestov (xii.87)6th Prize, Shakhmaty

v SSSR, 1987

4 + 5

No. 8204 O. Pervakov (iii.87)5th Prize, Shakhmaty

v SSSR, 1987

No.8204: Oleg Pervakov (Moscow).LBd8/i g2 2.Bf6 + Sc3 3.Sxc3 Bh4(ghQ; Sdl + ) 4.Bd4/ii Bg5 + 5.Kc2Be3 6.Bf6 + /iii Bg5 7.Bg7 Bh68.Bh8 Bg7 9.Bxg7 glQ/iv 10.Sg3Qxg3/v ll.Bd4 wins, and the pointof leaving bPd6 on the board finallyemerges -its presence prevents thedefensive pinning move bQg3-c7.i) l.Se3? Bd2 + 2.Kc2 Bxe3 3.Bxd6Bd4. l.Bxd6? would not win, as willbe seen.ii) 4.Bg7? glQ + . 4.Bh8? Bg5 + andghQ.iii) 6.Bxe3? ghQ 7.Bd4 Qc6, pinning,iv) Bl seems to have outwitted W, forif now 10.Bf6? Qc5 ll.Bg7 (Sg3,Qf2 + ;) Qc7 12.Bd4 Qc4, with a per-petual pursuit.v) Qc5 ll.Se4 Qc7 12.Sd2 a4 13.Bd4,with 14.Kcl, and wS will mate.

No.8205: Pavel Arestov (Rostovregion). I.a7 Rh4 + 2.Kg7 (elseRh8;) Se6 + 3.Kg8 Sc7 4.Rf7 (Rcl?Rc4;) Sa8/i 5.Rf8 Kc6 6.Rxa8 Kb77.Rb8 + /ii Kxa7 8.Rxb5 Rh59.Rc5Rxc5 10.bc Kb7, and now 'cha-sing two hares' as Russian puts it,draws: ll.Kf? g5 12.Ke6 g4 (else Kf5)13.Kd7, supporting wPc5 and dra-wing.i) Rxb4 5.Rd7 + Ke6 6.Rxc7 Ra47.Rb7.ii) 7.Rf8? Kxa7 8.Rf7 + Kb69.Rf6 + Kc7 10.Rxg6 Rxb4, with aneasy win. 'The wellknown 'Reti' iscombined with the less familiar Fritzidea (Prace, 1953):' dlbl 0401.11d3hlfl.a2f6 4/3 + . I.a3 Rxfl +2.Ke2 Rf4 (else wRdl) 3.Rb3 + Ka24.Rb4 wins, this version being a cor-rection.

No. 8206 V. Lovtsov (ii.87)= 1/2 Hon. Mention,

Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

989

Page 54: eg102-2.pdf

No.8206: V.Lovtsov (Magadanregion). I.c7 Kxc7 2.f6 Kb7(b8)/i3.f7 Ka7 4.Kbl/ii 5. Kc2/iii Ka7 6.Kcl Ka8 7. Kbl Ka7 8. Ka2 a3 9. a6Ka8 10.Kxa3 Ka7 ll.Ka4 Kxa612.Kb4 Ka7/iv 13.Ka5 Ka8 14.Ka6wins.i) Kc6 3.f7 Kb5 4.a6 Kxa6 5.Sd7 Se66.Sc5-Kii) 4.Ka3? Sf5 5.Se6 Bf6 6.f8QBe7+. 4.a6? a3 (zugzwang) 5.Kb3Kxa6 6.Kxa3 Ka5 7.Kb3 Kb5 8.Kc2Kc6.iii) 5.Kcl? Ka7 6.Kc2, fails to Sf57.Se6 Sd4 + 8.Sxd4 Bg7 9.Se6 Bh610.Kc3 a311.Kb3 Ka6, and a draw.iv)Sf513.Se6Bf614.Sc5 + .

No. 8207 V. Vinichenko (vi.87)= 1/2 Hon. Mention,

Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

No. 8208 N. Kondrafiuk, M. Kreimerand O. Pervakov (iii.87 and viii.88)

3 Hon. Mention, Shakhmatyv SSSR, 1987

No.8207: V.Vinichenko (Novosi-birsk). I.g6/i Se4/ii 2.Bxb2 Sd2 +3.Ke2 Sxbl 4.g7 Rc2 + /iii 5.Kel Rc86.Kdl/iv, and KM 7.g8Q Rxg88.Kc2 Rgl 9.Bcl+ drawing (with)acheck (cheque), or Kh4 7.g8Q Rxg88.Kc2 Rgl 9.Bcl Sc3 10.Be3 Rg3ll.Bf2, this time with a drawing-pin,i) l.Bxb2? Rb6 2.g6 Rb3 + 3.Kf4Rxb2 4.g7Rg2wins.ii) dSc4 2.g7 Rxf6 + 3.Kg3 Rfl4.Bg6 + and5.g8Q.iii) To provoke the error 5.Kdl? Rc8,with W in zugzwang: 6.g8Q Rxg87.Kc2 Rgl 8.Bel Sc3 9.Be3 Rg3.iv) The kernel. Bl is in zugzwang, asbK has no good move.

No.8208: N.Kondratiuk, M.Kreimerand O. Pervakov. I.c4 + /i Kxc42. Rxa2 Bxa2/ii 3. Re4 -I- /iii,and:Kb5 4.Re5 + Kb6 5.f8Q Qb4 +6.Rc5 Qxc5 + 7.Kd7 Qxf8 stale-mate, or Kd3 4.f8Q/iv Qa3 + 5.Rb4Qxb4 + 6.Ke5 Qd4-f 7.Kf5 Qf2 +8.Ke5 Qxf8 stalemate,i) l.Rxa2? Bxa2 2.c4 4- Qxc4 3.Re5 +Kb6 4.f8QQc7mate.ii) Qxa2 3.Rxbl and 4.Ke7.iii) 3.Re8? Qg3 + 4.Ke7 Qg5 +5.Kd7Qg7.iv) 4.Re3 + ? Kxe3 5.f8Q Qb4 +6.Ke5Qd4 + 7.Kf5Qf4+. This jointeffort arose out of a quick compo-sing tourney (theme: echoed stale-mate) at Odessa in 1986.The study had a chequered careertowards soundness: * Quick compo-sing is good,but maybe medium-speed is better!*

No. 8209 M. Matous (vii.87)4 Hon. Mention,

Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

990

Page 55: eg102-2.pdf

No.8209: Mario Matous (Prague).LRe4/i Sd5 + /ii 2.Kg3 Sf6 3.Rh4 +Sh5 + (Kg5; g7) 4.Rxh5 + Rxh5 5.g7Rg5 + 6.Kh4 Bd3 (Bxe8; g8Q) 7.Bg6Bc4 8.Bf7 Bxf7 9.g8S + (g8Q?Rh5 + ;) Kg6 10.Se7-f Kf6 ll.Sg8 +Kf5 12.Se7 + /iii Kf4 13.Sd5 + Kf514.Se7 + Kf6 15.Sg8 + , drawing dueto latent stalemates.i)l.Re3?Sd5 + .l.Rel?Sd3 + .ii) Sh5+ 2.Ke3 Sf6 3.Bxb5 Sxe44.Bd3.iii) 12.Sh6 + ? Kg6 13.Sxf7 Rd514.Sg5Rd4+.

). 8210 A.G. Kopnin andV. Kondratev (viii.87)

5 Hon. Mention, Shakhmatyv SSSR, 1987

No. 8211 I. Galushko (i.87)= 6/7 Hon. Mention,

Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

Draw 6 + 6

No.8210: A.G.Kopnin and V.Kon-dratev (Chelyabinsk). l.Rg8/iRxb6+ 2.Kd5 Rf6/ii 3.Bd6 Re64.Rf8 + Rf6 5.Rg8 Rf7 6.Be5/iiiRd7 + 7.Bd6 Rf7 8.Be5 Rd7 +9.Bd6 Kf6 10.Rf8 + Rf7 ll.Be5 +Ke7 12.Bd6 + Kf6 13.Be5 + Kg614.Rg8 + Kxh6 15.Rd8/iv Kg616.Rg8 + Kh6 17.Rd8 Rf6 18.Bxf6flQ 19.Bg5+ Kg6 2O.Rd6 + Kf721.Rd7 + Ke8 22.Rd8 + perpetualcheck.i) l.Rg7? Rxb6 + 2.Kd5 Rf6 3.Bd6Rxd6 + 4.Kxd6 Kf6 5.Rg8 Kf7.ii) Rb5 + 3.Bc5 Rxc5+ 4.Kxc5 Ke45.Rf8Ke3 6.Kb4 drawn,iii) 6.Rg7? Kf6 7.Be5 + Ke7 8.Bd6 +Ke8 9.Rg8 + Kd7 10.Rb8 Rf5 +wins, avoiding flQ? ll.Rb7 + .iv) The only way!

No.8211: I.Galushko (Volgograd).l.Bd5 + Kgl 2.Ke2/i Kh2 3.Kf2 Kh34.Kf3 Kh 25.Kg4(f4) Kgl 6.Kf5 Kf27.Ke6 Ke3 8.Kd7 Kd4 9.Kc6 (Kc8?Kc5;), 10.Kb7, and ll.Kxb8 wins,i) 2.Kc4? Kf2 3.Kb4 Ke3 4.Kb5 Kd35.Kc6 Kd4, and W is in zugzwang.

No. 8212 B. Rivkin (vii.87)= 6/7 Hon. Mention,

Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

No.8212: B.Rivkin (Moscow). I.g7Kh5/i 2.Be6/ii Rfl+ 3.Kh2/iiiRf2 + 4.Kg3 Rfl 5.Bh3 Rf7(f6)6.g8Q Rg7+ 7.Bg4+, the winninginterpolating check,i) Kf3 2.Be6 Kf2 3.Kh2 wins, but not3.Bh3?Rf3 4.Bg4Rf6.ii) 2.BH + ? Kh6 3.g8Q Rfl + 4.Kh2Rhl+ 5.Kg2 Rgl+ 6.Kxgl stale-mate.iii) 3.Kg2? Rf6 4.Bg4+ Kh6 5.g8QRf2+ 6.Kg3 Rf3+ 7.Kh4 Rh3 +and stalemate.

991

Page 56: eg102-2.pdf

No. 8213 A. Ivanov (iv.87 and iv.88)Commended, Shakhmaty

v SSSR, 1987

i) Kxf5? 2.Bxel, and 3.Sc3. Kg72.Be5 + Kf8 3.Bg6.ii) The h4 square is now blocked.iii) Threatening 7.Bdl+ Qxdl8.Se3 + .iv) Bc8 7.Bdl + Kf5 8.Bc2 + Qxc29.Se3 + Ke4 10.Sxc2 Kd3 ll.Bg5Kxc212.b5 Bd713.Be3 Bxb5 14.Bxa7Bd715.Bf2.v) Qe4 10.Be2+ Qxe2 ll.Sf4+.

No.8213: A.Ivanov (Chuvash auto-nomous region). l.Rf8 Bc3/i 2.Bxc3Sxc3+ 3.Kd4 Sb5 + 4.Ke3 Bh55.Rh8+ Kg5 (Kg6; Rxe8) 6.f4 +Kh4 7.Sf3+ Kg4 8.Se5 + Kh49.Sg6 + Kg4 10.Rxe8 Bxg6 ll.Re5 S-12.Rg5 + , and 13.Rxg6 wins.In the initial version wBa5 (nowwBel) allowed a draw by l.Rf8 Sd6 +2.Ke3 Bg7 3.Rb8 Bh5 4.Rb6 Be5 5.f4Sa3.i) Sd6 + 2.Ke3 Bg7 3.Rb8 Bb5 4.Rb6Bf8 5.Bb4wins.

8215 A. Maksimovskikh andV. Shupletsov (vi.87)

Commended, Shakhmatyv SSSR, 1987

Win 4 + 3

No. 8214 G. Slepyan (iv.87)Commended,

Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

No.8214: G.Slepyan (Minsk).LSd5+ Kg5/i 2.Bxel Bxf5+ 3.Kg3h4 + /ii 4.Kh2 blQ 5.Bd2 + Kg46.Ba4/iii Bc2/iv 7.Bd7 + Kh58.Be8 + Bg6 9.Bb5 Bd3/v 10.Be8 +Kg4 ll.Bd7 + Bf5 12.Ba4, positionaldraw.

No.8215: A. Maksimovskikh andV.Shupletsov (USSR). l.Sb5/i Ka22.Sd3/ii, with: blQ/iii 3.Ra8 + Kb34.Ra3 + Kc2 5.Rc3 + Rxc3 6.Sd4mate, or Rc2+ 3.Ke3 blQ/iv4.Ra8 + Kb3 5.Sd4 + Kc4 6.Rc8 +Kd5 7.Rd8+ Kc4 8.Se5+ Kc3/v9.Rc8+ Kb2 10.Sd3+ Ka2 ll.Ra8mate.i) l.Sd3? Kal 2.Rxb2 Re4+ 3.Kf2Rf4+ 4.Kg2 Rg4+ 5.Kh2 Rh4+,bR being a desperado,ii) 2.Ra8 + ? Kb3 3.Sa3 Ra4.iii) blS 3.Ra8+ Kb3 4.Ke3 Sc35.Sd4+ . Ra4 3.Sc3+ Kal, and now4.Sc5, but not 4.Sxb2? Rb4 5.Rxb4stalemate."iv)blS4.Ra8+ Kb3 5.Sd4+.v) Kc5 9.Se6 + and 10.Rb8 + .*A pair of checkmates with self-blocks/

992

Page 57: eg102-2.pdf

No. 8216 S. Osintsev (vii.87)Commended, Shakhmaty

v SSSR, 1987

i) Bl hopes to transfer bR to d7 andhide bK on d6. Rg3 6.Kxa4 Rh3 7.h6Kb7 8.h7 Rh6 9.Kb5, heading for theg7 square.ii) 6.Kb5? is premature, Kb7 7.h6Rg3 8.h7Rh3 9.Kb4a3.iii) Try: 7.h7? Kd6 8.Kxc4 Rc7 +9.Kd4 Rd7 10.Ra8 e5 + ll.fe-hKe6 + andRxh7.iv) a3 8.h7 a2 9.Rc8+ Kxc810.h8Q + Rd8 ll.Qc3 Rxd212.Kc6.

No.8216: S.Osintsev (Sverdlovsk).l.Qb4/i Qc8 + /ii 2.Kg7 Ke8 + /iii3.Kg8 (Kg6? Rf7;) Ke7 + 4.Rd8 +Kxd8 5.Qd6 + Rd7 6.c7 + Qxc77.Qf8 mate.i) LRd7 + ? Rxd7 2.Qh7+ Kf63.Qxd7Qb5 4.Qd6 + Kf7.ii) Qal+ 2.Kg8 Ra8+ 3.Rd8 +Kxd8 4.Qd6+ mates.iii) Qf8 + 3.Kg6 Qe8+ 4.Kg5 Kf75.Qf4 + Kg8 6.Rg6 + Rg7 7.Rxg7 +Kxg7 8.Qf6 + Kh7 9.Qh6+.

No. 8218 B. Rivkin(xii.87)Commended, Shakhmaty

v SSSR, 1987

No. 8217 V. and L. Kalsnelson (x.87)Commended, Shakhmaty

v SSSR, 1987

Win 6 + 7

No.8217: V. and L.Katsnelson (theLeningrad brothers). l.Rb8 + Rd82.c7 Rc8 3.Rxc8 + Kd7 4.Rh8 Kxc75.h5 Rg7/i 6.h6/ii Rd7 7.Kc5/iiiRd5 + /iv 8.Kxc4 Rd7 9.h7 Kd610.Ra8 Rc7 + ll.Kd4 Rxh712.Ra6+, 13.Ra7 + and 14.Rxh7,winning.

No.8218: B.Rivkin. l.Se5+ Kb72.Rf7+ Kc8/i3.Rf8 + Kb7 4.Rb8 +Ka6 (Kxb8; Sf3 + ) 5.Ra8 + Kb76.Ra7 + Kc8 7.Sc6 Rcl+ 8.Kd5Rdl + 9.Ke6 Rel+ 10.Kf7 Rfl +ll.Kg8 Rf4 12.Bxf4 glQ+ 13.Rg7Qb6 14.Sa7+ Kd8 15.Bg5+ Ke816.Re7+ Kd8 17.Rb7(e6)+ and18.Rxb6 wins,i) Ka6 3.Ra7 + Kxa7 4.Bf2 4- wins.

No.8219: V.Israelov and the late A. V.Sarychev. I.f6 g2/i 2.Bxg2+ Kxg23.f7 Bh5 4.Sf4+ Kxhl 5.Sxh5 d26.Sg3 + Kg2/ii 7.Sfl (Sf5? Kf2;) dlQ(Kxfl; f8Q +) 8.Se3 + ,one last fork,winning.i) d2 2.f7 dlQ 3.f8Q+ Ke4 4.Sc3 +wins.ii) Kh2 7.Sfl + . Kgl 7.Se2+ and8.Sc3.

993

Page 58: eg102-2.pdf

No. 8219 V. Israelov andA.V. Sarychev (v.87)

Commended, Shakhmatyv SSSR, 1987

Win

No. 8220 V. Kondratev (xi.87)Prize, Special Section,

Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

No.8220: V.Kondratev (Gavrilovposad). This section was for 'roman-tic ideas'.I.f7+ Ka2 2.Qxal + Kxal 3.Bxf5/ief 4.Kb7 Ra2 5.c8Q Rb2 + 6.Ka6Ra2+ 7.Kb5 Rb2 + 8.Ka4 Ra2 +9.Kb3 Rb2 + 10.Kc3/ii Bg7 +ll.Kd3 Rb3 + 12.Ke2 Rb2 + 13.KHRbl + 14.Kf2 Rb2 + /iii 15.KglRbl + 16.Kh2 Be5+ 17.g3 Rb2 +18.Kh3g4 + 19.Kh4Bf6 + 2O.Kh5/ivRh2 + 21.Kg6wins.i) Wait for note (iv)! 3.Kb7? Ra24.Bxf5 Rb2 + 5.Ka6 Ra2 + 6.Kb5Rb2 + and now 7.Ka4 Rb4 + 8.Ka5Rc4.ii) Crossing the c-file, but there's along way to go yet.iii)Bd4+ 15.Ke2Rb2+ 16.Kd3.

iv) Is it all over yet? Yes, but onlybecause wK has the square g6 availa-ble.The 'Special section' was for'romantic ideas'.

No. 8221 K. Sumbatyan (xi. 86)Hon. Mention, Special

Section,Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

No.8221: K.Sumbatyan (Moscow).I.b7 Rb4 + 2.Kal a5 3.b8B/i Rxe44.bBd6 + Rb4 5.Bc7R-/ii6.gBd6 +Rb4 7.Be5 R- 8.cBd6 + Rb4 9.Bb2mate.i) 3.b8Q? Rbl + and stalemate.3.b8S? Rxe4 4.Bd6 + Rb4 5.Bxb4 +ab.ii) Well, Rbl + 6.Kxbl Kb4 7.eitherBd6+ and8.a3.Columnist Kuznetsov decreed thatthis genuine 1986 study qualified forthe 1987 tourney because Sumbatyandisqualified himself in 1986 - bybeing that year's judge! A differentway to resolve this ethical dilemma isfor a second judge to be responsiblefor judging a judge's entry. An alter-native alternative is for the study notto compete in any tourney. To mymind the 'second judge' solution isthe best as being fairest to all concer-ned - and the tidiest, for it causes-least confusion in the long run, sinceonly one question has to be answe-red, namely: how did a judge judgehis own entry?

994

Page 59: eg102-2.pdf

No. 8222 E. Kolesnikov (xii.87)Hon. Mention, Special

Section,Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

No. 8224 A. Kolovand V. Razumenko (x.87)

Commended, Special Section,Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

No.8222: E.Kolesnikov (Moscow).l.Sg2 e2/i 2.Se4 (Sf3? Bc3;) Bxa33.Sc3 + Kb4 4.Sxe2 de 5.Sf4 elB/ii6.Sd5 + Ka4 7.Sb6 + Kb4 8.Sd5 +Kc5 9.Se3 eBb4 10.Sc2 Sc4 ll.Kb3Sd2 + /iii 12.Ka4 Sbl 13.Kb3 Sd2 +l.Ka4, positional draw.i)Sc4 2.abd2 3.Se4.ii) elQ 6.Sd3 + . elS 6.Sd5+ Ka47.Sb6 + Kb4 8.Sd5 + with perpetualcheck. Now wehave the 'Veitch'force of two like B's and S against S.iii) Kb5 12.Sd4+ Kc4 13.Se6+, per-petual.

o. 8223 V. Vinichenko(vi.86 and iii.87)

Commended, Special Section,Shakhmaty v SSSR, 1987

Win 6 + 6

No.8223: V.Vinichenko (Novosi-birsk). l.Be6 + Kg5 (Kxe6; Qf7 + )2.Rd5 + Qxd5 3.Bxd5 clQ 4.Bd2 g25.Bxg2 Qxc6 6.Kd3 + Kf5 7.Qxf6 +Qxf6 8.Bh3 + Ke5 9.Bc3 + wins.

No.8224: A.Kotov and V.Razu-menko (Leningrad). l.f8Q flQ2.Ra7 + /i Sxa7 3.Qxfl Rbl +4.Kxbl de+ 5.Kal, with: efB 6.Be2Bg2/ii 7.Bf3 Bh3 8.Bg4 Bg2 9.Bf3Bfl 10.Be2, with perpetual pursuitofthe promoted bB, or efS 6.Bc2Bg8/iii 7.Bh7 Bf7 8.Bg6 Be6 9.Bf5Bd5 10.Be4 Bc4 ll.Bd3 Bb3 12.Bc2Ba2 13.Bbl, with perpetual pursuitof the unpromoted bB.i) 2.Qxfl? Rbl+ 3.Kxbl de + andefQ.ii) Sc6 7.Bxfl Sd4 8.Bc4 Sc2 + 9.KblSe3 + lO.Kal draw.iii) Sd2 7.Bxh7 Sc6 8.Bc2 Sd4 9.Bdldrawn.Again with 'extra' pieces.

No. 8225 E. Janosi (i.90)1st Prize, CHESS LIFE,

1988-89award: xii.90

No. 8225: Ervin Janosi (now ofHungary, was Romania). Judge: Pal

995

Page 60: eg102-2.pdf

Benko. Prizes were supplied byHeraldica Imports. Chess Lifecolumnist Benko has worked withdate of receipt rather than date ofpublication. Consequently, somestudies in this '1988-89' event werepublished in 1990. This is irregularfor an informal tourney, but weknow that space for Benko's columnwas restricted.l.Be2/i Sf2 + /ii 2.Kxg3 KH/iii3.Rh6 S6e4+ 4.Kh4 Rbl/iv 5.Bf3Rb3 6.Rh5/v Rxf3 7.Rf5 + Rxf5 sta-lemate.i) l.Bd5? is a thematic try, based onSf2 + ? 2.Kxg3 S6e4 + 3.Kh2 Rxg64.Bf7+ Kxf7 stalemate, but g2!2.Rxg2 Sf2+ 3.Kh4 Kf7, and4.Rg5(g3) Rb4+, or 4.Rh6 Kg7.LKxg3?Se5 2.Bb5+ Kf7withawin.l.Bfl? Sf2+ 2.Kg2 S2e4 and willalso win.ii) Kf7 2.Rxg4 Sxg4 3.Bxg4 Rb34.Kg2Kf6 5.Bf3drawn.iii) S6e4 -h 3.Kf4 Rxg6 4.Bh5 draw,iv) Rxh6+ 5.Bh5 + and stalemate.Rb4 5.Bh5 + Kg7 6.Rg6 + , and Kh77.Rgl Sf6+ 8.Kg3 S2e4 + 9.Kh4, orKf6 7.Bg4 Rg3 8.Rf5 + and 9.Rxf2,drawing.v) 6.Bg2? Rg3 7.Rh7 + Kg8 8.Bxe4Rh3 + 9.Kg5 Sxe4 + wins. 6.Bg4?Rg3 7.Bf5 Rf3 8.Bc8 Rf4 + 9.Kh5Shi 10.Be6+ Kf8 ll.Rh8 + Kg712.Rg8 + Kh713.Rg4Slg3 + 14.Kh4Rf6 15.Bg8+ Kh8 16.Kh3 Sf2 +wins.

No. 8226 R. Becker (x.88)2nd Prize, CHESS LIFE,

1988-89also: best American entry

No. 8226: Richard Becker (Oregon,USA). l.Kg3 Re2 2.Kf4 Kf7 3.Kf5Rf2 + 4.Ke4 Ke6 5.a7 clQ 6.RxclRa2 7.Rc6 + Kd7 8.Rh6 Rxa7 9.e6 +(Rh7 + ? Ke6;) Kd6 10.e7 + Kd7ll.e8Q + Kxe8 12.Rh8+ Kf713.Rh7 + wins.

No. 8227 S. Polgar (vi.88)3rd Prize, CHESS LIFE,

1988-89

Draw 6 + 5

No. 8227: Zsuzsa (Susan) Polgar(Hungary). l.Sel/i Rxel 2.Rbl Sxe43.Qxe4 Rxe4 4.Rb4 Bd4 5.Rb5 +Be5 6.Rb4 Rel (Re3; Re4) 7.Rbl Re4(Re2; Rel) 8.Rb4 Bd4 9.Rb5 +drawn.'All three Polgar sisters are quiteinterested in the artistic side of chess!Which, being interpreted, can onlymean that they will always put thegame first!i) l.Rbl? Rxbl 2.Qxbl Sxbl 3.Se3Sc3 4.Sc4Bf4wins.

No. 8228 R. Becker (i.90)1 Hon. Mention,

CHESS LIFE, 1988-89

Win 4 + 3

No. 8228: R.Becker. I.c3/i Sf5 2.c4Sd6/ii 3.c5 Sb7 4.c6 Sxd8/iii 5.c7Sb7 6.c8R Sxa5 7.Rc5 Sb7 8.Rc6mate.

996

Page 61: eg102-2.pdf

i) I.c4? Sf5 2.c5 Se7 3.c6 Sd5 4.Sb7Sc3 + 5.Kb4Sd5 + 6.Kc5 Se7 7.Kd6Sxc6 8.Kxc6 stalemate, just one pos-sibility, naturally.ii) Se7 3.c5 Sd5 4.c6 Sc3 + 5.Kb4Sd5 + 6.Kc5Se7 7.Kd6Sf5 + 8.Kd7wins.iii) The Dutch composer Weenink'sstudy (year 1918) starts here.

No. 8229 J. Lerch (vii.88)2 Hon. Mention,

CHESS LIFE, 1988-89

No. 8229: Jan Lerch (Trinec, Czech-oslovakia). l.Se3 Sxe5 2.Sxg4/iSd7+ 3.Ke7 Sxb6 4.Se5 (Se3?Sd5 + ;) Sxa4 5.Sc4 + Kb5 6.Sd6 +Ka5 7.Kd7/ii Sc5 + (Sxb2; Kc6)8.Kc6 Sxb3 9.Sb7 + Ka4 10.Kb6 a5ll.Ka6 and mates.i)2.Sc4 + ?Sxc4 3.Sxc4 + Qxc4 4.bcKxa4 5.Ke7a5 6.c5Kb5.ii) 7.Sb7 + ? Kb6 8.ba Kxb7 9.Kd6Kb6.

No. 8230 K. Shira/i (v.88)3 Hon. Mention,

CHESS LIFE, 1988-89

No. 8230: Kamran Shirazi (NewYork). l.Qf7 + /i Kxf7 2.Bb3 + Kf6/ii 3.Bb2 + Kf5 4.Be6+ Kxe45.Rg4 + Kd3 6.Bf5 + Be4 7.Rxe4

Kc2 8.Rb4 + Kd2 9.Rd4 mate,i) l.Bxe7? hopes for Rxe7? 2.Bb3 +Kh8 (Kf8; Rf4 + ) 3.Qxh7 + win-ning, but Qb6+! 2.Kel (Kg3,Sf6;)Rxe7 3.Rxe7Qb4+.ii) Kf8 3.Rf4 + Sf6 4.Rxf6+. Bd53.Bxd5+ Kf6 4.Bb2+ Kf5 5.Be6 +Kxe4 6.Rg4+ Kd3 7.Bf5 + .

No. 8231 J.C. Aliaga (iii.90)Commended,

CHESS LIFE, 1988-89

Draw 3 + 3

No. 8231: Juan Carvajal Aliaga(Bolivia). l.Rg8+ Ka7/i 2.Rg7 +Ka6 3.Rg6+ Ka5 4.Rgl/ii Sb3 5.e4/iii Kb6 6.Ke3 Scl 7.Rg6+ Kc58.Rg5+ Kc4 9.Rg8 blQ 10.Rc8 +Kb3 11.Rb8+ drawn.i) Kb7 2.Rg7 + Kc6 3.Rgl Sb3 4.Ke2Scl+ 5.Kd2blQ6.Rxcl+ drawn.ii) 4.Rg5 + ? Ka4 5.Rgl Sb3 6.e4 Ka37.Ke3 Scl 8.Rg8 blQ 9.Ra8+ Kb2wins.iii) 5.Kf4? Scl 6.Rg8 Sd3+ 7.Kf3Ka4 8.Rgl Scl 9.Rg8 Sb3 lO.RglKa3.

No. 8232 G. Amiryan (ix.89)Commended,

CHESS LIFE, 1988-89

997

Page 62: eg102-2.pdf

No. 8232: Gamlet Amiryan (Arme-nia). l.Bg3 Bc5+ 2.Kf3 Bd5 + 3.e4Bxe4-f 4.Kxe4 Bgl 5.Kf3 Bxh26.Bg2 + Kgl 7.Bf2 mate.

No. 8233 R. Brieger (vii.88)Commended,

CHESS LIFE, 1988-89

No. 8233: Robert Brieger (Texas,USA). LSd8Sa6+ 2.Kb7Sc7 3.Se6/i Sa5+ 4.Kb6 Sc4 + 5.Kc5 Sxe6 +6.Kxc4 Sc7 7.Sd5 Sa8 8.Kc5 Kc89.Kc6 Kd8 10.Kb7 Kd7 ll.Sb6 +wins.i) 3.Sc6? Sc5+ 4.Kb6 S5e6, and5.Sb5 Sa8+ 6.Kb7 Sc5 + 7.Kxa8Kxc6 8.Kb8 Sd7+ 9.Kc8 Sb6+, or5.Se4 Kc8 6.Se7 4- Kd7 7.Sg6 Sa8 +8.Kb7 Sd4 9.Kxa8 Sb5, drawing.

No. 8234 R. Brieger (v.89)Commended,

CHESS LIFE, 1988-89

No. 8234: R.Brieger. I.f7 a3 2.Rc2/ia2 3.Rxa2 Rb8 4.Rb2 Rc8 5.Rc2 Ra86.Kf2 (Ke2? Rd8;) Rf8 7.Kg2 Rd88.Re2 (Kg3? Rd3 + ;) Rg8 + 9.fgQ +wins.i) 2.Rxa3? Rb8 3.Rb3 Ra8 4.RblRd8, drawing by perpetual check orstalemate.

235 J.C. Infantozzi (v.90)Commended,

CHESS LIFE, 1988-89

Win 8 + 6

No. 8235: Julio Cesar Infantozzi(Uruguay). l.Sf3 e5/i 2.Sh4 Kxh43.h3a24.f4ef5.Bd4f3 + 6.Kh2Kg57.c4 Kf4 8.Kgl wins, but not 8.c5?alQ 9.Bxal Ke3 lO.Kgl Ke2 ll.Bd4Bd4 a3 'and Bl is still alive',i) a2 2.h3 + , and Kf5 3.Sh4+ Kg54.Be3 + Kxh4 5.f4, or Kf4 3.Be3 +Kf5 4.Sh4 + Ke5 5.Bd4 + Kd5 6.Sf3with 7.c4 + , winning.The final study in the Americanaward was not clearly identified: weread 'Rusinek' and '1574', but thelatter is by Brieger. However, theadjacent Rusinek numbered 1575 is anice pin stalemate number, so I'massuming that's the one that Benkochose. The Brieger started with acapture.

No. 8236 J. Rusinek (ix.90)Commended,

CHESS LIFE, 1988-89

Draw 5 + 6

No. 8236: Jan Rusinek (Warsaw). 1.Se2 + /i Sxe2 (Kd2; Sxc3) 2. gf a2/ii3. Kxa2 (f8Q? alQ;) dSc3 + 4. Ka3/

998

Page 63: eg102-2.pdf

iii Sbl+ 5. Ka2/iv bSc3 + (eSc3 + ;Kal) 6. Ka3 Sb5 + 7. Ka4/v eSc3 +8. Kb3 Be6+ 9. Sc4 Bxf7 stalemate,i) 1. gf? a2 2. f8Q (Be2 + , Kd2/) alQ3. Kc4 Qa2+ and 4. Sb3 + Kb2 5.Kc5 Qa7, of 4. Kc5 Qf2 + 5. Kd6Qd4 + 6. Kc7 (Ke7, Qxb4 + ;) Sd5 +wins,ii) Be6 + 3. Kxa3 Bxf7 (dSc3; Sb3 +)

4. b5 Sd4 5. Kb4 (b6? Sc2+ ;) Se3 6.b6 draw.iii) 4. Kal? Sd4 mates. 4. Kb3?Be6+.iv) 5. Ka4? eSc3 + 6. Kb3 Be6 +wins.v) The bl square is available for Bl,so 5. Ka2? Bbl + 6. Kb3 eSd4 + 7.Kc4Ba2+ wins.

*C* GBR class 1601With acknowledgement to the ICCAJournal (1 of 1992) we reproduce thefirst computer-generated (Stiller,Elkies et al.) reci-zugs in a 6-manending.

999

Page 64: eg102-2.pdf

*C* GBR class 1300.01This stardjAg sample of optimal playin the 5-man endgame queen againstrook ancUpawn, a classic hunting-ground of endgame theory, is due toLars Rasmussen of Denmark. Theannotations were readily extractedwith the user-friendly ChessBaseinterface. The commentary is largelyRasmussen's also.

h6b21300.01 h7 c5.c4 2/3 + .l.Qb7+ Kcl2.Qhl+ Kb2 3.Dh2 +Kb3 4. Qb8 + Kc2 5. Qd6 Rb5 6. Qc6Rb4 7. Qe4+ Kb3 8. Qbl+ Kc3 9.Qa2 Rb3 10. Qa4/i Rb4 11. Qa3 +Rb3 12. Qc5 Rb4 13. Kg7/ii Kb3 14.Qd5 Ka3 15. Qc6Kb3 16. Qe6Ka3 17.Qe3+ Kb2 18. Qe4 Ra4/iii 19.Qe2 + /iv Kcl 20. Qe3 + Kc2 21. Qd4Rb4 22. Qe4 + Kb3 23. Qbl + Kc324. Qa2 Kd3/v 25. Qa3 + Rb3 26.Qa6 Rb2 27. Kf6 Re2 28. Qb5 Kd429. Qa4 Rel 30. Kg5/vi Kd3 31.Qd7 + Kc3/vii 32. Kf4 Re2 33. Qa4Kd3 34. Qdl+ Rd2 35. Qbl + Kd436. Qb4 Rf2 + 37. Kg3 Ra2 38. Kf3Kd3 39. Qd6+ Kc3 40. Ke3 Rb2 41.Qa3 + Rb3 42. Qcl + Kb4 + 43. Ke2Rd3 44. Qg5 Ra3 45. Qg7 Rd3 46.Qb7+ Kc3 41. Kel Rd2 48. Qf3 +Rd3 49. Qf6+ Kb3 50. Qb6 + Kc351. Qa5+ Kb3 52. Qb5 + Kc3 53.Qa4 Rd5/viii 54. Qa8! Rd3 55.Qa3 + Kd4/ix 56. Qa5 Rb3 57. KdlRbl + 58. Kc2 Rb3 59. Kcl Rc3 + 60.Kb2 Rd3 61. Qb6 + Kd5 62. Qb5 +Kd4 63. Ka2 Rb3 64. Qc6 Kc3 65.Qd6/x Rb2 + 66. Ka3 Rb3 + 67. Ka4Rb2 68. Qe5 + Kc2 69. Qd4 c3/xi 70.Qe4 + Kcl/xii 71. Ka3 Kd2 72.Qd4+ Kc2 73. Qc4 Kbl 74. Qfl +

Kc2 75. Qe2 + Kcl76. Qd3 Rc2 77.Qd4 Kbl 78. Qdl+ Rcl 79. Qb3 +Kal 80. Qa2 mate.i)10. Kg5?Kb4, andc4-c3.ii) Explained by (iii).iii) With wKg7 there is no check frombR followed by bPc4-c3.iv)19. Kf6? c3, draws, but notRa6 + ? 20. Ke5 c3 21. Qb7 + Kcl 22.

Qxa6c2 23.Qa2Kdl24.Kd4clQ25.Kd3.v) Rb3 25. Kf6 Kb4 26. Ke4, and if c3(Rd3 is 'better') 27. Kd4 Ra3 28.qc4+ Ka5 29.Kc5.vi) The square f5 is needed for wQ.vii) With wKf5 Bl can play bKc2, notblocking his pawn. Here, however,bKc2 fails tot 32. Qf5+ Kd2 33.Qd5 + Kc3 34. Qa5 + .viii) Cheron III 1445c C, after move2, continues: 54. Qa3+ Kc2 55.Qb4? Re5 + 56. Kf2 c3, draw,ix) Kc2 56. Qb4 Re3 + (c3; Qe4) 57.Kf2, and wins by gaining a tempo onbR.x) Cheron III 1445b.xi) The first P-move. Note that 'con-version' (out of the database) is bywinning promotion or capture, notP-advance. The database is thereforevery large,xii) cheron prefers Kd2 71. Ka3.

OBITUARY

JAN H. MARWITZDutch FidemasterChesscomposition.

*8Oct. 1915-16dec. 1991

Former problem-composer, he pre-ferred Endgames.He has seen his last book "Eind-speelkunst" issued 30 Nov. 1991, oneweek before he died.

1000