el camino college ipeds data feedback report 2016 summary of … · 2019. 5. 19. · ecc are...

Research & Planning i March 2017

El Camino College IPEDS Data Feedback Report 2016 Summary of Findings The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) distributes a standard report to college and university leaders each year entitled IPEDS Data Feedback Report. The report summarizes demographic, enrollment and achievement data from the previous year (in this report, data through 2014-15 academic year and Fall 2015) and includes comparative references from earlier reports. Median results from a comparison group developed by each institution are displayed next to institutional results. The darker bars on all charts represent El Camino College (ECC) while the lighter bars represent the comparison group median. The median is the value for the college located in the middle of an ordered list of college values; each measure may have a different institution at its median. Methodological notes are on pages 8 through 10 of the report.

Current comparison group members, or peers, include the following, some of which serve as the same comparison group used for ECC’s Academic Performance Profile: • Cerritos • East Los Angeles • Glendale • Long Beach

• Los Angeles Harbor • Los Angeles Pierce • Mt. San Antonio • Pasadena

• Rio Hondo • Riverside • San Diego Mesa • Santa Monica

Note: Members of the comparison group may be changed annually by the institution

Figure 1. Race/Ethnicity and Gender The racial/ethnic and gender distributions at El Camino College are similar to comparison colleges, with ECC having a slightly lower percentage of Hispanic/Latino students and a greater percentage of African-American students. These similarities and differences have remained consistent over the past few years.

Figure 2. Headcount, FTE While full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment is a good indicator of relative institutional size, full-time (student) enrollment is a positive indicator of college persistence and goal completion. ECC is one of the larger schools in the comparison group, serving 4% more students and generating 10% more FTE enrollment than the medians for the group during the 2014-2015 school year. ECC experienced a slight decline of 4% in the number of full-time students enrolled at ECC in Fall 2015 (7,960) compared to Fall 2014 (8,298). However, ECC served 12% more full-time students in Fall 2015 compared to the peer institutions’ median (7,137). ECC continues to be among the top colleges within the comparison group in enrolling full-time students.

Figure 3. Number of Degrees and Certificates ECC awarded more degrees than the peer median in 2014-2015 (40%). In contrast, the number of medium-term certificates earned are notably fewer in number at ECC compared to the majority of our peer institutions. Most of the certificate growth at ECC was found among short-term awards.

Board of Trustees Agenda/Student and Community Advancement - April 17, 2017

http://www.elcamino.edu/administration/ir/docs/regional/2014AcademicProfile_ECCPeers.pdf

Research & Planning ii March 2017

Figures 4-5. Academic Year Tuition and Fees These figures show 3- or 4-year trends of college costs. Figure 4 shows that ECC’s academic year tuition and fees in 2015-16 were slightly lower ($1,142) compared to its peer group ($1,220). However, Figure 5 indicates that the average net price of attendance in 2014-15 was higher for ECC students ($9,939) than the peer group median ($7,324).

Figures 6-9. Grant/Scholarship Recipients The percentage of all students from ECC receiving some form of reported financial aid was 56% in 2014-15, which is lower than the peer group median of 63% (see Figure 8). Although a slightly greater percentage of ECC students received Pell grants in 2014-15 (30%) compared to 2013-2014 (28%), this percentage is lower compared to 34% for the comparison group. Average award amounts (in dollars) were similar to the peer median. Figure 9 also shows that ECC students received no federal loans (see Figure 9). As of August 2013, ECC no longer participates in the Federal Direct Loan Program.

Figure 6 shows that the percentage of first-time, full-time, degree/certificate-seeking (FTF) students at ECC who received financial aid (66%) was lower than the median college (74%). Two percent of FTF students received institutional grants (scholarships), compared to no institutional grants reported for peer group median in 2014-15. In terms of levels of aid (in dollars), FTF students received similar grant awards as the peer group median (Figure 7). ECC reported no loans.

Figures 10-13. Graduation & Transfer-Out Rates These figures reflect a variety of graduation and transfer rates along with fall-to-fall persistence (IPEDS refers to this rate as Retention).

Graduation levels in this report indicate that ECC’s graduation rates for the Fall 2012 FTF cohort are higher than at least half of its peer institutions. Graduation rates for first-time, full-time degree-/certificate-seeking students in 2015 (Figure 11) were considerably higher for ECC than the peer median, with a graduation rate of 32% which is 5 percentage points higher than the median.

Figure 12 represents graduation rates disaggregated by student ethnicity. It shows that although ECC’s overall graduation rate is higher than the median group, Black or African American students (14%) graduated at rates lower than the group median (18%). However, these rates largely depend on the structure of the cohort. While Fall 2012 cohort shows lower graduation rates for Black or African American students, Fall 2011 cohort indicated graduation rates that were 2 points higher than the median. For disaggregated completion rates of all students who received program awards in the 2015-16 academic year, please see the 2015-16 Time to Completion Report.

The data in Figure 11 also shows a transfer-out rate of 10%, which is slightly lower than the peer median of 12%. This rate, mandated under Student Right-to-Know, measures all college transitions, including to other community colleges. California Community College and local transfer rates, such as reported in the Annual Factbook, are better measures of actual 4-year transfer.


http://www.elcamino.edu/administration/ir/docs/acadperformance/TimeToCompletionReport2015-2016ECC.pdf

http://www.elcamino.edu/administration/ir/docs/acadperformance/TimeToCompletionReport2015-2016ECC.pdf

http://www.elcamino.edu/administration/ir/factbook.asp

Research & Planning iii March 2017

College retention rates in Figure 10 show higher retention rates for full-time students (78% versus 74% for peers) and slightly lower for part-time students (49% versus 52% for peers). Looking at time-to-degree measure in Figure 13, ECC had slightly higher rates of completion for all time spans (normal time, 150% time, 200% time) compared to the peer median.

Figure 14-17. Staffing, Salaries, Revenues & Expenses Similar to Figure 3, the comparative staffing levels reported in Figure 16 may reflect differences in enrollment levels, local definitions and institutional organization, so comparison is less meaningful. Also, revenue sources and expenses as detailed in Figures 14 and 15 are affected by institutional size and local definition.

Figure 17, which compares average salaries of full-time instructional staff, shows that salaries at ECC are slightly higher than the median institution.

Conclusion Despite demographic similarities with peer institutions, ECC had better student outcomes in many categories of the 2016 report than the median institution, especially in terms of degree and certificate counts, time to graduation rates, and persistence rates. The report does not give an indication of where ECC ranks numerically within the peer group but the rates demonstrate that El Camino College is continuing to perform among top colleges in the group in these outcomes.


Image description. Cover Image End of image description.

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICSWhat Is IPEDS?

The Integrated Postsecondary Education DataSystem (IPEDS) is a system of survey componentsthat collects data from about 7,500 institutions thatprovide postsecondary education across the UnitedStates. IPEDS collects institution-level data onstudent enrollment, graduation rates, studentcharges, program completions, faculty, staff, andfinances.

These data are used at the federal and state level forpolicy analysis and development; at the institutionallevel for benchmarking and peer analysis; and bystudents and parents, through the College Navigator(http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), an online tool to aidin the college search process. For more informationabout IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds.

What Is the Purpose of This Report?

The Data Feedback Report is intended to provideinstitutions a context for examining the data theysubmitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is toprovide institutional executives a useful resource andto help improve the quality and comparability ofIPEDS data.

What Is in This Report?

As suggested by the IPEDS Technical Review Panel,the figures in this report provide selected indicatorsfor your institution and a comparison group ofinstitutions. The figures are based on data collectedduring the 2015-16 IPEDS collection cycle and arethe most recent data available. This report provides alist of pre-selected comparison group institutions andthe criteria used for their selection. Additionalinformation about these indicators and the pre-selected comparison group are provided in theMethodological Notes at the end of the report.

Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data?

Each institution can access previous Data FeedbackReports as far back as 2005 and customize thislatest report by using a different comparison groupand IPEDS variables of its choosing. To downloadarchived reports or customize the current DataFeedback Report (DFR), please visit our web site athttp://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Home/UseTheData.

El Camino Community College DistrictTorrance, CA


http://collegenavigator.ed.gov

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Home/UseTheData

El Camino Community College District

COMPARISON GROUPComparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s statistics. If your institution did not define a customcomparison group for this report by July 17, NCES selected a comparison group for you. (In this case, the characteristics used to define thecomparison group appears below.) The Customize Data Feedback Report functionality on the IPEDS Data Center(http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/) can be used to reproduce the figures in this report using different peer groups.

The custom comparison group chosen by El Camino Community College District includes the following 12 institutions:

Cerritos College (Norwalk, CA)East Los Angeles College (Monterey Park, CA)Glendale Community College (Glendale, CA)Long Beach City College (Long Beach, CA)Los Angeles Harbor College (Wilmington, CA)Los Angeles Pierce College (Woodland Hills, CA)Mt San Antonio College (Walnut, CA)Pasadena City College (Pasadena, CA)Rio Hondo College (Whittier, CA)Riverside City College (Riverside, CA)San Diego Mesa College (San Diego, CA)Santa Monica College (Santa Monica, CA)

The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas:

1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) [No charts applicable] 2) Student Enrollment Fig. 1 and 2 Pg. 33) Awards Fig. 3 Pg. 34) Charges and Net Price Fig. 4 and 5 Pg. 45) Student Financial Aid Fig. 6, 7, 8 and 9 Pg. 4 and 56) Military Benefits* [No charts applicable] 7) Retention and Graduation Rates Fig. 10, 11, 12 and 13 Pg. 5 and 68) Finance Fig. 14 and 15 Pg. 6 and 79) Staff Fig. 16 and 17 Pg. 710) Libraries* [No charts applicable]

*These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFR), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT2Board of Trustees Agenda/Student and Community Advancement - April 17, 2017

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/

Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, American Indian or Alaska Native.Item 1, Your institution 0.01, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01, hover text on image.Group 2, Asian.Item 1, Your institution 13, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 11, hover text on image.Group 3, Black or African American.Item 1, Your institution 15, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 5, hover text on image.Group 4, Hispanic/Latino.Item 1, Your institution 51, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 57, hover text on image.Group 5, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.Item 1, Your institution 1, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01, hover text on image.Group 6, White.Item 1, Your institution 13, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 14, hover text on image.Group 7, Two or more races.Item 1, Your institution 5, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 3, hover text on image.Group 8, Race/ethnicity unknown.Item 1, Your institution 0.01, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 2, hover text on image.Group 9, Nonresident alien.Item 1, Your institution 2, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 2, hover text on image.Group 10, Women.Item 1, Your institution 52, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 53, hover text on image.Race/ethnicity or gender Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Enrollment measureHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of students.Group 1, Unduplicated headcount - total.Item 1, Your institution 32634.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 31264.Group 2, Total FTE enrollment.Item 1, Your institution 14990.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 13657.Group 3, Full-time fall enrollment.Item 1, Your institution 7960.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 7137.Group 4, Part-time fall enrollment.Item 1, Your institution 16041.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 14956. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Level of awardHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of awards.Group 1, Associate's.Item 1, Your institution 1977.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1414.Group 2, Certificates of at least 2 but less than 4 years.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 3, Certificates of at least 1 but less than 2 years.Item 1, Your institution 163.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 325.Group 4, Certificates of less than 1 year.Item 1, Your institution 247.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 275. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.


Figure 1. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2015

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

American Indian orAlaska Native

Asian Black orAfrican American

Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian or other

Pacific Islander

White Two or more races Race/ethnicityunknown

Nonresident alien Women

0 0

13 1115

5

5157

1 0

13 14

5 30 2 2 2

52 53

Race/ethnicity or gender

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12)

NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See "Use ofMedian Values for Comparison Group" for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2015, Fall Enrollment component.

Figure 2. Unduplicated 12-month headcount (2014-15), total FTEenrollment (2014-15), and full- and part-time fallenrollment (Fall 2015)

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000

Number of students

Part-timefall enrollment

Full-timefall enrollment

Total FTEenrollment

Unduplicatedheadcount - total

14,956

16,041

7,137

7,960

13,657

14,990

31,264

32,634

Enrollment measure


NOTE: For details on calculating full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, see CalculatingFTE in the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, 12-monthEnrollment component and Spring 2016, Fall Enrollment component.

Figure 3. Number of subbaccalaureate degrees and certificatesawarded, by level: 2014-15

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000

Number of awards

Certificates of lessthan 1 year

Certificates of at least 1but less than 2 years

Certificates of at least 2but less than 4 years

Associate's

275

247

325

163

0

0

1,414

1,977

Level of award


NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, Completionscomponent.


Image description.Academic yearHorizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Tuition and fees.Group 1, 2015-16.Item 1, Your institution $1142.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1220.Group 2, 2014-15.Item 1, Your institution $1142.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1198.Group 3, 2013-14.Item 1, Your institution $1142.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1202.Group 4, 2012-13.Item 1, Your institution $1142.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1179. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Academic yearHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Net price.Group 1, 2014-15.Item 1, Your institution $9939.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $7324.Group 2, 2013-14.Item 1, Your institution $9936.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $7405.Group 3, 2012-13.Item 1, Your institution $11648.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $7336. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of students.Group 1, Any grant aid.Item 1, Your institution 66.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 74.Group 2, Federal grants.Item 1, Your institution 51.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 56.Group 3, Pell grants.Item 1, Your institution 51.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 56.Group 4, State/local grants.Item 1, Your institution 64.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 72.Group 5, Institutional grants.Item 1, Your institution 2.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 6, Any loans.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 2.Group 7, Federal loans.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 2.Group 8, Other loans.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Aid dollars.Group 1, Any grant aid (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $5113.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $5128.Group 2, Federal grants (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $4574.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $4623.Group 3, Pell grants (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $4466.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $4536.Group 4, State/local grants (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $1577.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $1577.Group 5, Institutional grants (N=3).Item 1, Your institution $1029.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $404.Group 6, Any loans (N=9).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $4107.Group 7, Federal loans (N=9).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $4107.Group 8, Other loans (N=0).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.


Figure 4. Academic year tuition and required fees for full-time,first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates:2012-13 to 2015-16

$0 $250 $500 $750 $1,000 $1,250

Tuition and fees

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

$1,179

$1,142

$1,202

$1,142

$1,198

$1,142

$1,220

$1,142

Academic year


NOTE: The tuition and required fees shown here are the lowest reported from thecategories of in-district, in-state, and out-of-state. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, InstitutionalCharacteristics component.

Figure 5. Average net price of attendance for full-time, first-timedegree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, whowere awarded grant or scholarship aid: 2012-13 to 2014-15

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000

Net price

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

$7,336

$11,648

$7,405

$9,936

$7,324

$9,939

Academic year


NOTE: Average net price is for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students and is generated by subtracting the average amount of federal,state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship awarded aid from the totalcost of attendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and requiredfees, books and supplies, and the average room and board and other expenses. Fordetails, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparisongroup.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, InstitutionalCharacteristics component; Winter 2015-16, Student Financial Aid component.

Figure 6. Percent of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students who were awarded grant orscholarship aid from the federal government, state/localgovernment, or the institution, or loans, by type of aid:2014-15

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of students

Other loans

Federalloans

Any loans

Institutionalgrants

State/localgrants

Pellgrants

Federalgrants

Any grantaid

00

20

20

02

7264

5651

5651

7466

Type of aid


NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federalgovernment, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grantsand other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded tostudents. For details on how students are counted for financial aid reporting, see CohortDetermination in the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 7. Average amounts of grant or scholarship aid from thefederal government, state/local government, or theinstitution, or loans awarded to full-time, first-timedegree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, bytype of aid: 2014-15

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000

Aid dollars

Other loans (N=0)

Federalloans (N=9)

Any loans (N=9)

Institutionalgrants (N=3)

State/localgrants (N=12)

Pellgrants (N=12)

Federalgrants (N=12)

Any grantaid (N=12)

$4,107

$4,107

$404$1,029

$1,577$1,577

$4,536$4,466

$4,623$4,574

$5,128$5,113

Type of aid

Your institution Comparison Group Median

NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federalgovernment, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grantsand other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded tostudents. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aid awarded by thetotal number of recipients in each institution. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group. Medians are not reported for comparison groups with less than threevalues.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, StudentFinancial Aid component.


Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent of students.Group 1, Any grant aid.Item 1, Your institution 56.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 63.Group 2, Pell grants.Item 1, Your institution 30.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 34.Group 3, Federal loans.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Type of aidHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Aid dollars.Group 1, Any grant aid (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $3126.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $2953.Group 2, Pell grants (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $3568.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $3695.Group 3, Federal loans (N=9).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $4150. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.MeasureHorizontal Bar chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Group 1, Full-time retention rate.Item 1, Your institution 78.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 74.Group 2, Part-time retention rate.Item 1, Your institution 49.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 52. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.MeasureHorizontal Bar chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Group 1, Graduation rate, Overall.Item 1, Your institution 32.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 27.Group 2, Transfer-out rate.Item 1, Your institution 10.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 12. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.


Figure 8. Percent of all undergraduates awarded aid, by type ofaid: 2014-15

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent of students

Federalloans

Pell grants

Any grant aid

1

0

34

30

63

56

Type of aid


NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federalgovernment, state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loansincludes only federal loans awarded to students. N is the number of institutions in thecomparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 9. Average amount of aid awarded to all undergraduates, bytype of aid: 2014-15

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000

Aid dollars

Federal loans (N=9)

Pell grants (N=12)

Any grant aid (N=12)

$4,150

$3,695

$3,568

$2,953

$3,126

Type of aid


NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid from the federal government,state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loans includes federalloans to students. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aidawarded by the total number of recipients in each institution. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, StudentFinancial Aid component.

Figure 10. Retention rates of full-time, first time degree/certificateseeking students (Fall 2014 cohort)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Part-time retentionrate

Full-time retention rate

52

49

74

78

Measure


NOTE: Retention rates are measured from the fall of first enrollment to the following fall.Academic reporting institutions report retention data as of the institution's official fallreporting date or as of October 15, 2014. Program reporters determine the cohort withenrollment any time between August 1-October 31, 2014 and retention based on August1, 2015. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions inthe comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2015, Fall Enrollmentcomponent.

Figure 11. Graduation and transfer-out rates of full-time, first-timedegree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150%of normal time to program completion (2012 cohort)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Transfer-out rate

Graduation rate,Overall

12

10

27

32

Measure


NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seekingundergraduate students. Graduation and transfer-out rates are the Student Right-to-Knowrates. Only institutions with mission to prepare students to transfer are required to reporttransfer out. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number ofinstitutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, GraduationRates component.


Image description.Bar chart with 10 groups with 2 items per group.Y scale titled Percent.Group 1, Graduation rate, Overall (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 32, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 27, hover text on image.Group 2, American Indian or Alaska Native (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 0.01, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01, hover text on image.Group 3, Asian (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 50, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 42, hover text on image.Group 4, Black or African American (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 14, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 18, hover text on image.Group 5, Hispanic /Latino (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 27, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 21, hover text on image.Group 6, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (N=9).Item 1, Your institution 43, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 0.01, hover text on image.Group 7, White (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 39, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 31, hover text on image.Group 8, Two or more races (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 34, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 26, hover text on image.Group 9, Race/ethnicity unknown (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 50, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 30, hover text on image.Group 10, Nonresident alien (N=12).Item 1, Your institution 38, hover text on image.Item 2, Comparison Group Median 36, hover text on image.Graduation rates by race/ethnicity Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Time to program completionHorizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Graduation rate.Group 1, Normal time.Item 1, Your institution 11.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 9.Group 2, 150% of normal time.Item 1, Your institution 30.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 26.Group 3, 200% of normal time.Item 1, Your institution 39.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 36. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Revenue sourceHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Percent.Group 1, Tuition and fees.Item 1, Your institution 8.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 7.Group 2, State appropriations.Item 1, Your institution 33.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 37.Group 3, Local appropriations.Item 1, Your institution 22.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 11.Group 4, Government grants and contracts.Item 1, Your institution 33.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 32.Group 5, Private gifts, grants, and contracts.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 0.01.Group 6, Investment return.Item 1, Your institution 1.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1.Group 7, Other core revenues.Item 1, Your institution 5.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 8. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.


Figure 12. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time to programcompletion, by race/ethnicity: 2012 cohort

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cent

Graduation rate,Overall (N=12)

American Indian orAlaska Native

(N=12)

Asian (N=12)

Black or African

American (N=12)

Hispanic/Latino (N=12)

Native Hawaiian orother Pacific Islander (N=9)

White (N=12)

Two ormore races

(N=12)

Race/ethnicityunknown (N=12)

Nonresidentalien

(N=12)

3227

0 0

50

42

1418

2721

43

0

39

3134

26

50

30

38 36

Graduation rates by race/ethnicity


NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. The graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rates. Medianvalues for the comparison group will not add to 100%. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, Graduation Ratescomponent.

Figure 13. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates withinnormal time, and 150% and 200% of normal time tocompletion: 2011 cohort

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Graduation rate

200% of normal time

150% of normal time

Normal time

36

39

26

30

9

11

Time to program completion


NOTE: The 150% graduation rate is the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rates; the Normaltime and 200% rates are calculated using the same methodology. For details, see theMethodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, 200%Graduation Rates component.

Figure 14. Percent distribution of core revenues, by source: Fiscalyear 2015

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Percent

Other corerevenues

Investment return

Private gifts, grants,and contracts

Government grantsand contracts

Localappropriations

Stateappropriations

Tuition and fees

85

11

00

3233

1122

3733

78

Revenue source


NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the comparisongroup that report finance data using the same accounting standards as the comparisoninstitution. For a detailed definition of core revenues, see the Methodological Notes. N isthe number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2015, Financecomponent.


Image description.Expense functionHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Dollars per FTE.Group 1, Instruction.Item 1, Your institution $5075.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $4852.Group 2, Research.Item 1, Your institution $0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $0.01.Group 3, Public service.Item 1, Your institution $410.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $207.Group 4, Academic support.Item 1, Your institution $1013.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $913.Group 5, Institutional support.Item 1, Your institution $1873.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1449.Group 6, Student services.Item 1, Your institution $1736.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1291.Group 7, Other core expenses.Item 1, Your institution $3867.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $2404. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Staff categoryHorizontal Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Number of staff.Group 1, Postsecondary Teachers and staff.Item 1, Your institution 528.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 453.Group 2, Instructional support occupations.Item 1, Your institution 28.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 24.Group 3, Management.Item 1, Your institution 53.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 32.Group 4, Business and financial operations.Item 1, Your institution 65.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 14.Group 5, Computer, engineering, and science.Item 1, Your institution 24.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 10.Group 6, Community service, legal, arts, and media.Item 1, Your institution 25.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 15.Group 7, Healthcare.Item 1, Your institution 0.01.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 2.Group 8, Other.Item 1, Your institution 268.Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 189. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.

Image description.Academic rankHorizontal Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group.X scale titled Average salary.Group 1, All ranks (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $79578.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $78039.Group 2, Professor (N=0).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data.Group 3, Associate professor (N=0).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data.Group 4, Assistant professor (N=0).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data.Group 5, Instructor (N=12).Item 1, Your institution $79578.Item 2, Comparison Group Median $78039.Group 6, Lecturer (N=0).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data.Group 7, No academic rank (N=0).Item 1, Your institution No data.Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data. Shapeline, Label: ShapeInstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution ShapeComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: ShapeComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description.


Figure 15. Core expenses per FTE enrollment, by function: Fiscalyear 2015

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000

Dollars per FTE

Other coreexpenses

Student services

Institutional support

Academic support

Public service

Research

Instruction

$2,404$3,867

$1,291$1,736

$1,449$1,873

$913$1,013

$207$410

$0$0

$4,852$5,075

Expense function


NOTE: Expenses per full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, particularly instruction, may beinflated because finance data includes all core expenses while FTE reflects credit activityonly. For details on calculating FTE enrollment and a detailed definition of core expenses,see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, 12-monthEnrollment component and Spring 2015, Finance component.

Figure 16. Full-time equivalent staff, by occupational category: Fall2015

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Number of staff

Other

Healthcare

Community service, legal,arts, and media

Computer, engineering,and science

Business and financialoperations

Management

Instructional supportoccupations

Postsecondary Teachersand staff

189268

20

1525

1024

1465

3253

2428

453528

Staff category


NOTE: Graduate assistants are not included. For calculation details, see theMethodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2015, HumanResources component.

Figure 17. Average salaries of full-time instructional non-medicalstaff equated to 9-month contracts, by academic rank:Academic year 2015-16

$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000

Average salary

No academic rank (N=0)

Lecturer (N=0)

Instructor (N=12)

Assistant professor (N=0)

Associate professor (N=0)

Professor (N=0)

All ranks (N=12)

$78,039$79,578

$78,039$79,578

Academic rank


NOTE: Average salaries of full-time instructional non-medical staff equated to 9-monthcontracts was calculated by multiplying the average monthly salary by 9. The averagemonthly salary was calculated by dividing the total salary outlays by the total number ofmonths covered by staff on 9, 10, 11 and 12-month contracts. Medians are not reportedfor comparison groups with less than three values.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2015, HumanResources component.



METHODOLOGICAL NOTES

Overview

This report is based on data supplied by institutions to IPEDS during the 2015-16 data collection year. Response rates exceeded 99% formost surveys. Detailed response tables are included in IPEDS First Look reports at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010.

Use of Median Values for Comparison Group

The value for the comparison institution is compared to the median value for the comparison group for each statistic included in the figure. Ifmore than one statistic is presented in a figure, the median values are determined separately for each indicator or statistic. Medians are notreported for comparison groups with fewer than three values. Where percentage distributions are presented, median values may not add to100%. To access all the data used to create the figures included in this report, go to ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website(http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds).

Missing Statistics

If a statistic is not reported for your institution, the omission indicates that the statistic is not relevant to your institution and the data were notcollected. Not all notes may be applicable to your report.

Use of Imputed Data

All IPEDS data are subject to imputation for total (institutional) and partial (item) nonresponse. If necessary, imputed values were used toprepare your report.

Data Confidentiality

IPEDS data are not collected under a pledge of confidentiality.

Disaggregation of Data by Race/Ethnicity

When applicable, some statistics are disaggregated by race/ethnicity. Data disaggregated by race/ethnicity have been reported using the1997 Office of Management and Budget categories. Detailed information about the race/ethnicity categories can be found athttp://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/reic/resource.asp.

Cohort Determination for Reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates

Student cohorts for reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates data are based on the reporting type of the institution. Forinstitutions that report based on an academic year (those operating on standard academic terms), student counts and cohorts are based onfall term data. Student counts and cohorts for program reporters (those that do not operate on standard academic terms) are based onunduplicated counts of students enrolled during a full 12-month period.

DESCRIPTION OF STATISTICS USED IN THE FIGURES

Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools)

Admissions and Test Score Data

Admissions and test score data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time,degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. Applicants include only those students who fulfilled all requirements for considerationfor admission and who were notified of one of the following actions: admission, non-admission, placement on a wait list, or applicationwithdrawn (by applicant or institution). Admitted applicants (admissions) include wait-listed students who were subsequently offeredadmission. Early decision, early action, and students who began studies during the summer prior to the fall reporting period are included. Forcustomized Data Feedback Reports, test scores are presented only if they are required for admission.


http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/reic/resource.asp


Student Enrollment

FTE Enrollment

The full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment used in this report is the sum of the institution’s FTE undergraduate enrollment and FTE graduateenrollment (as calculated from or reported on the 12-month Enrollment component). Undergraduate and graduate FTE are estimated using 12-month instructional activity (credit and/or contact hours). See “Calculation of FTE Students (using instructional activity)” in the IPEDSGlossary at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/.

Total Entering Undergraduate Students

Total entering students are students at the undergraduate level, both full- and part-time, new to the institution in the fall term (or the priorsummer term who returned in the fall). This includes all first-time undergraduate students, students transferring into the institution at theundergraduate level, and non-degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates entering in the fall. Only degree-granting, academic year reportinginstitutions provide total entering student data.

Charges and Net Price

Average Institutional Net Price

Average net price is calculated for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who were awarded grant or scholarship aidfrom the federal government, state/local government, or the institution anytime during the full aid year. For public institutions, this includesonly students who paid the in-state or in-district tuition rate. Other sources of grant aid are excluded. Average net price is generated bysubtracting the average amount of federal, state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship aid from the total cost ofattendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and required fees, books and supplies, and the average room and boardand other expenses.

For the purpose of the IPEDS reporting, aid awarded refers to financial aid that was awarded to, and accepted by, a student. This amountmay differ from the aid amount that is disbursed to a student.

Retention and Graduation Rates

Graduation Rates and Transfer-out Rate

Graduation rates are those developed to satisfy the requirements of the Student Right-to-Know Act and Higher Education Act, as amended,and are defined as the total number of individuals from a given cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates whocompleted a degree or certificate within a given percent of normal time to complete all requirements of the degree or certificate programbefore the ending status date of August 31, 2014; divided by the total number of students in the cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates minus any allowable exclusions. Institutions are permitted to exclude from the cohort students who died or weretotally and permanently disabled; those who left school to serve in the armed forces or were called up to active duty; those who left to servewith a foreign aid service of the federal government, such as the Peace Corps; and those who left to serve on an official church mission.

Transfer-out rate is the total number of students from the cohort who are known to have transferred out of the reporting institution (withoutearning a degree/award) and subsequently re-enrolled at another institution within the same time period; divided by the same adjusted cohort(initial cohort minus allowable exclusions) as described above. Only institutions with a mission that includes providing substantial preparationfor students to enroll in another eligible institution are required to report transfers out.

Retention Rates

Retention rates are measures at which students persist in their educational program at an institution, expressed as a percentage. For four-year institutions, this is the percentage of first-time bachelors (or equivalent) degree-seeking undergraduates from the previous fall who areagain enrolled in the current fall. For all other institutions this is the percentage of first-time degree/certificate-seeking students from theprevious fall who either re-enrolled or successfully completed their program by the current fall. The full-time retention rate is calculated usingthe percentage of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates, while the part-time rate is calculated using the percentage ofpart-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates.

Finance

Core Revenues

Core revenues for public institutions reporting under GASB standards include tuition and fees; state and local appropriations; governmentgrants and contracts; private gifts, grants, and contracts; sales and services of educational activities; investment income; other operating and

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT9


http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/


non-operating sources; and other revenues and additions (federal and capital appropriations and grants and additions to permanentendowments). Core revenues for private, not-for-profit institutions (and a small number of public institutions) reporting under FASB standardsinclude tuition and fees; government appropriations (federal, state, and local); government grants and contracts; private gifts, grants, andcontracts (including contributions from affiliated entities); investment return; sales and services of educational activities; and other sources.Core revenues for private, for-profit institutions reporting under FASB standards include tuition and fees; government appropriations, grants,and contracts (federal, state, and local); private grants and contracts; investment income; sales and services of educational activities; andother sources. At degree-granting institutions, core revenues exclude revenues from auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores, dormitories),hospitals, and independent operations. Nondegree-granting institutions do no report revenue from auxiliary enterprises in a separatecategory. These amounts may be included in the core revenues from other sources.

Core Expenses

Core expenses include expenses for instruction, research, public service, academic support, institutional support, student services,scholarships and fellowships (net of discounts and allowances), and other expenses. Expenses for operation and maintenance of plant,depreciation, and interest are allocated to each of the other functions. Core expenses at degree-granting institutions exclude expenses forauxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores, dormitories), hospitals, and independent operations. Nondegree-granting institutions do not reportexpenses for auxiliary enterprises in a separate category. These amounts may be included in the core expenses as other expenses.

Endowment Assets

Endowment assets, for public institutions under GASB standards, and private, not-for-profit institutions under FASB standards, include grossinvestments of endowment funds, term endowment funds, and funds functioning as endowment for the institution and any of its foundationsand other affiliated organizations. Private, for-profit institutions under FASB do not hold or report endowment assets.

Equated Instructional Non-Medical Staff Salaries

Institutions reported total salary outlays by academic rank and gender, and the number of staff by academic rank, contract length (9-, 10-, 11-,and 12-month contracts), and gender. The total number of months covered by salary outlays was calculated by multiplying the number of staffreported for each contract length period by the number of months of the contract, and summing across all contract length periods. Theweighted average monthly salary for each academic rank and gender was calculated by dividing the total salary outlays by the total number ofmonths covered. The weighted average monthly salary was then multiplied by 9 to determine an equated 9-month salary for each rank.

Salaries, Wages, and Benefits

Salaries, wages, and benefits, for public institutions under GASB standards, and private, not-for-profit institutions under FASB standards,include amounts paid as compensation for services to all employees regardless of the duration of service, and amounts made to or on behalfof an individual over and above that received in the form of a salary or wage. Frequently, benefits are associated with an insurance payment.Private, for-profit institutions under FASB standards do not report salaries.

Staff

Student-to-Faculty Ratio

The guidance provided to institutions for calculating their student-to-faculty ratio is as follows: the number of FTE students (using FallEnrollment data) divided by the total FTE instructional staff (using the total Primarily instruction + Instruction/research/public service staffreported on the EAP section of the Human Resources component and adding any not primarily instructional staff that are teaching a creditcourse). For this calculation, FTE for students is equal to the number of full-time students plus one-third the number of part-time students;FTE for instructional staff is similarly calculated. Students enrolled in "stand-alone" graduate or professional programs (such as medicine, law,veterinary, dentistry, social work, or public health) and instructional staff teaching in these programs are excluded from the FTE calculations.

Additional Methodological Information

Additional methodological information on the IPEDS components can be found in the publications available athttp://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010.

Additional definitions of variables used in this report can be found in the IPEDS online glossary available at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/.


http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/

el camino college ipeds data feedback report 2016 summary of … · 2019. 5. 19. · ecc are...

Documents