el paso county, colorado · and surveyors, dated may 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the...

34
1 FINAL DRAINAGE LETTER FOR LOT 48, HIGH FOREST RANCH FILING NO. 2 EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO AUGUST 2017 Prepared for: Alan D. Butterfield 4324 Candlewood Lane Port Orange, FL 32127 Prepared by: 20 Boulder Crescent, Suite 110 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 955-5485 Project #70-048 PCD Project #CDR-17-001

Upload: others

Post on 06-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

1

FINAL DRAINAGE LETTER

FOR

LOT 48, HIGH FOREST RANCH FILING NO. 2

EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO

AUGUST 2017

Prepared for:

Alan D. Butterfield

4324 Candlewood Lane

Port Orange, FL 32127

Prepared by:

20 Boulder Crescent, Suite 110

Colorado Springs, CO 80903

(719) 955-5485

Project #70-048 PCD Project #CDR-17-001

Page 2: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

2

FINAL DRAINAGE LETTER

FOR

LOT 48, HIGH FOREST MEADOWS FILING NO. 2

DRAINAGE PLAN STATEMENTS

ENGINEERS STATEMENT

The attached drainage plan and report was prepared under my direction and supervision and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Said drainage report has been prepared according to the criteria established by the County for drainage reports and said report is in conformity with the applicable master plan of the drainage basin. I accept responsibility for any liability caused by any negligent acts, errors of omission on my part in preparing this report.

____________________________________

Virgil A. Sanchez, P.E. #37160 For and on Behalf of M&S Civil Consultants, Inc

DEVELOPER’S STATEMENT

I, the developer have read and will comply with all the requirements specified in this drainage report

and plan. BY:___________________________________

TITLE:__________________________

DATE:__________________________

ADDRESS: Alan D. Butterfield 4324 Candlewood Lane Port Orange, FL 32127

EL PASO COUNTY'S STATEMENT

Filed in accordance with the requirements of El Paso County Land Development Code, Drainage Criteria Manual Volumes 1 and 2, and the Engineering Manual, as amended.

BY:______________________________ DATE:___________________ Jennifer Irvine, P.E.

County Engineer

CONDITIONS:

Page 3: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

3

FINAL DRAINAGE LETTER

FOR

LOT 48, HIGH FOREST MEADOWS FILING NO. 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PURPOSE 4

GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 4

SOILS 4 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 4

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS 5

FLOODPLAIN STATEMENT 5

DRAINAGE CRITERIA 5 EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS 5

PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS 5 EROSION CONTROL 6 CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION 6 DRAINAGE & BRIDGE FEES 6

SUMMARY 6

REFERENCES 7

APPENDIX

Vicinity Map

Soils Map

FIRM Panel

Hydrologic Calculations

Hydraulic Calculations Grading Erosion Control Plan

Drainage Maps

Page 4: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

4

FINAL DRAINAGE LETTER

FOR

LOT 48, HIGH FOREST MEADOWS FILING NO. 2

PURPOSE This document is intended to serve as the Final Drainage Letter for Lot 48, of High Forest Meadows

Filing No. 2. The purpose of this document is to identify and analyze the on and offsite drainage patterns

and to ensure that post development runoff is routed through the site safely and in a manner that satisfies

the requirements set forth by the El Paso County Drainage Criteria Manual. The proposed principal use

for the site consist a single family residential home site.

GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Lot 48, of High Forest Meadows is located in the east half of Section 26, Township 11 South, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. in El Paso County, Colorado. The site is bound on the northwest by the existing Open Sky Way asphalt roadway. To the east by Lots 49 and 50 of High Forest Meadows Filing No. 2, both are currently vacant. To the west by Lots 45, 46 and 47 of High Forest Meadows Filing No. 2, all are developed with a residential single family home on each lot. To the south by a vacant parcel of land that currently has a single family residential home site and several outbuildings. The site lies within the East Cherry Creek Drainage Basin. Flows from this site are tributary to Black Squirrel Creek, which travels onto City of Colorado Springs land (Northgate). Then crosses under I-25 and then continues across U.S.A.F.A property. Lot 48, of High Forest Meadows Filing No. 2 consists of 15.96 acres in which is presently undeveloped. The majority of the site is characterized by rolling hills with natural valleys and swales drainage southeasterly of the site. Ground cover is fair with the primarily vegetation consisting of native grasses with a few Ponderosa pine trees.

SOILS

Soils for this project (see soils map provided in the appendix) consist of #41 Kettle gravely loamy sand, #67, Peyton sand loam, and #92 Tomah-Crowfoot loamy sands. All soils are characterized as Hydrologic Type "B"soils as mapped by S.C.S. in the "Soils Survey of El Paso County Area".

HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS This site is subject to the findings within the MDDP for High Forest Ranch prepared by JR Engineering,

date June 2000, and by the Final Drainage Report for High Forest Ranch Filing No. 2 & No. 3 prepared

by Classic Consulting Engineers and Surveyors, dated May 2001. Hydrologic calculations were

performed using the El Paso County and City of Colorado Springs Storm Drainage Design Criteria

manual and where applicable the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. The Rational Method was

used to estimate stormwater runoff anticipated from design storms with 5-year and 100-year recurrence

intervals.

Page 5: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

5

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS Hydraulic calculations were estimated using the Manning's Formula and the methods described in the El

Paso County and City of Colorado Springs Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. The relevant data

sheets are included in the appendix of this report.

FLOODPLAIN STATEMENT

According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)

Panel No. 08041C0325 F, effective date March 17, 1997, no portion of this site is located within a

floodplain.

DRAINAGE CRITERIA

This drainage analysis has been prepared in accordance with the current City of Colorado Springs/El

Paso County Drainage Criteria Manual. Calculations were performed to determine runoff quantities for

the 5-year and 100-year frequency storms for developed conditions using the Rational Method as

required for basins having areas less than 100 acres.

EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS

Lot 48, of High Forest Meadows Filing No. 2 consists of 15.96 acres in which is presently undeveloped.

The majority of the site is characterized by a few rolling hills with natural valleys and swales.

Vegetation is sparse, consisting of Ponderosa Pines and native grasses. A ridge line runs north to south

along the western portion of the property, directing runoff from 1.0 acres of the nearly 16.0 acres site to

the west, while the majority of the drainage is directed to the eastern boundary of the lot. Offsite runoff

impacting the subject site, reaches as sheet flow smaller local basins along the east and west perimeter,

and as concentrated flow from three existing corrugated metal culverts (21”, 24” and 30”) which convey

concentrated flow under Open Sky Way from portions of 4 larger residential lots and portions of

roadway located to the north of the site. As shown on the Existing Conditions Map provided in the

appendix drainage easements were previously provided across Lot 48, from the outfall of the 21 and 30”

CMPs, while no easement was provided from the 24” pipe. Runoff reaching the eastern boundary at

Design Points E3, E5, and E10 in the existing condition in the 100 year event is 36.3cfs, 8.2cfs, and

36.8cfs respectively, while runoff at the western discharge point at E4 is 2.3 cfs (100 year event).

PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS General Concept Drainage Discussion

Lot 48, of High Forest Meadows Filing No. 2 consists of a total of 15.96 acres in which is presently

undeveloped. The proposed site improvements shall consists of an approximately 4000 SF (footprint)

single family residence located near the northeastern corner of the site, outside of the preservation area.

A 12’ wide proposed impervious driveway (10,500 sq ft) and embankment will connect the proposed

residence to Open Sky Way (private roadway). The total site disturbance shall be approximately 7.10

acres. No import or export of dirt is anticipated. It should be noted that during the writing of this report

the actual driveway surface materials have not been determined at this time and will most likely be

constructed of concrete or asphalt.

Page 6: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

6

With the exception of the noted improvements, the majority of the Lot 48’s natural topography and drainage patterns shall be left in its natural state. The proposed drainage improvements include a proposed 36” RCP pipe with a 36” FES at each end. A proposed 17’long x 14’ wide x 1.5’thick riprap apron (D50=9”) shall be recommended to be constructed at the outlet to slow discharge from the culvert. The purpose for the drainage improvements is to ensure the existing flow patterns continue on their natural course without hindrance. Runoff reaching the eastern boundary in the proposed condition at Design Points 3, 5, and 10 in the existing condition in the 100 year event is 36.7cfs, 8.5cfs, and 36.8cfs respectively, while runoff at the western discharge point at 4 is 2.3 cfs (100 year). The total impervious acreage for the subject site is approximately 0.33 acres. When divided across the 15.96 acres results in about 2% total site imperviousness. This is less than the average anticipated imperviously percentage provided in the drainage planning documents of 7 to 8%. As such the proposed development is in line with the development plan assumptions made within the approved MDDP for High Forest Ranch prepared by JR Engineering, date June 2000, and by the Final Drainage Report for High Forest Ranch Filing No. 2 & No. 3 prepared by Classic Consulting Engineers and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development.

EROSION CONTROL

It is the policy of the El Paso County that we submit a grading and erosion control plan with the drainage

report. Proposed silt fence, vehicle traffic control, and concrete washout area are proposed as erosion

control measures.

CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION

Private Drainage Facilities NON-Reimbursable: Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Cost

1. 36" RCP 83 LF $124/LF $ 10,292.00 2. 36” RCP FES 2 EA $450/EA $ 900.00 3. D50= 9” RIP RAP 14 CY $98/CY $ 1,372.00

Total $ 12,564.00

DRAINAGE & BRIDGE FEES

No drainage fees are due as the site has been previously platted.

M & S Civil Consultants, Inc. (M & S) cannot and does not guarantee the construction cost will not vary from these opinions of probable costs. These opinions represent our best judgment as design professionals familiar with the construction industry and this development in particular. The above is only an estimate of the facility cost and drainage basin fee amounts in 2017.

SUMMARY The proposed development of Lot 48, of High Forest Ranch is in line with the development plan assumptions made within the approved MDDP for High Forest Ranch prepared by JR Engineering, date June 2000, and by the Final Drainage Report for High Forest Ranch Filing No. 2 & No. 3 prepared by Classic Consulting Engineers and Surveyors dated May 2001 and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development.

Page 7: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

7

REFERENCES

1.) "El Paso County and City of Colorado Springs Drainage Criteria Manual". 2.) "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual"

3.) SCS Soils Map for El Paso County.

4.) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Effective date

March 17, 1997.

5.) "Final Drainage Report for High Forest Ranch Filing No. 2 and High Forest Meadows Filing No. 3, dated May 2001, by Classic Consulting Engineers & Surveyors, LLC.

6.) " MDDP for High Forest Ranch”, dated May 2001, by JR Engineering.

Page 8: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

 

 

APPENDIX

Page 9: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

 

VICINITY MAP

Page 10: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that
Page 11: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

 

SOILS MAP

Page 12: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that
Page 13: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

Soil Map—El Paso County Area, Colorado

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey

7/15/2017Page 1 of 3

4323

850

4323

900

4323

950

4324

000

4324

050

4324

100

4324

150

4324

200

4324

250

4323

850

4323

900

4323

950

4324

000

4324

050

4324

100

4324

150

4324

200

4324

250

522620 522670 522720 522770 522820 522870 522920

522620 522670 522720 522770 522820 522870 522920

39° 4' 2'' N10

4° 4

4' 1

9'' W

39° 4' 2'' N

104°

44'

5'' W

39° 3' 47'' N

104°

44'

19'

' W

39° 3' 47'' N

104°

44'

5'' W

N

Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS840 100 200 400 600

Feet0 30 60 120 180

MetersMap Scale: 1:2,190 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.

Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Page 14: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

 

FLOOD PLAIN MAP

Page 15: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that
Page 16: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

 

HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS

Page 17: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

BASIN

TOTAL

AREA

TOTAL

AREA

AREA

C5

C100

AREA

C5

C100

AREA

C5

C100

C5

C100

(SF

)(A

cres

)(A

cres

)(A

cres

)(A

cres

)

EX

114

8784

.03.

420.

430.

900.

960.

060.

590.

702.

920.

080.

350.

190.

43

EX

217

9106

.04.

110.

430.

900.

960.

060.

900.

963.

630.

080.

350.

180.

42

EX

356

198.

01.

290.

160.

900.

960.

150.

900.

960.

980.

080.

350.

270.

49

EX

434

7007

.07.

970.

000.

900.

960.

000.

300.

507.

970.

080.

350.

080.

35

EX

544

480.

01.

020.

000.

900.

960.

000.

300.

501.

020.

080.

350.

080.

35

EX

615

1044

3.47

0.00

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

3.47

0.08

0.35

0.08

0.35

EX

741

4867

9.52

0.12

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

9.40

0.08

0.35

0.09

0.36

DE

VE

LO

PE

DU

ND

EV

EL

OP

ED

WE

IGH

TE

D

LO

T 4

8, H

IGH

FO

RE

ST

RA

NC

HE

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

INA

GE

CA

LC

UL

AT

ION

S(A

rea

Ru

nof

f C

oeff

icie

nt S

um

mar

y)

ST

RE

ET

S /

DE

VE

LO

PE

D

EX

741

4867

9.52

0.12

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

9.40

0.08

0.35

0.09

0.36

EX

810

370

0.24

0.12

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

0.12

0.08

0.35

0.48

0.65

EX

915

2487

3.50

0.00

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

3.50

0.08

0.35

0.08

0.35

EX

1019

1799

4.40

0.15

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

4.26

0.08

0.35

0.11

0.37

EX

1197

960.

220.

120.

900.

960.

000.

300.

500.

100.

080.

350.

520.

68

EX

1223

216

0.53

0.00

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

0.53

0.08

0.35

0.08

0.35

Cal

cula

ted

by:

Dat

e:C

heck

ed b

y:

CM

N7/

17/2

017

VA

S

MS

CIV

IL, I

NC

Lot 4

8 H

igh

For

est R

anch

(E

xist

ing)

700

487/

18/2

017

Page 18: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

OV

ER

LA

ND

ST

RE

ET

/ C

HA

NN

EL

FL

OW

Tim

e of

Tra

vel (

Tt)

BASIN

AREA

TOTAL

C5

C100

C5

Length

Height

TC

Length

Slope

Velocity

Tt

TOTAL

I 5I 100

Q5

Q100

(Acr

es)

(ft)

(ft)

(min

)(f

t)(%

)(f

ps)

(min

)(m

in)

(in/

hr)

(in/

hr)

(c.f

.s.)

(c.f

.s.)

EX

13.42

0.19

0.43

0.19

100

59.

680

66.

6%3.

93.

513

.13.

76.

32.

59.

3

EX

24.11

0.18

0.42

0.18

100

78.

871

08.

3%4.

32.

711

.53.

96.

62.

911

.4

EX

31.29

0.27

0.49

0.27

100

87.

50

0.0%

0.0

0.0

7.5

4.6

7.7

1.6

4.9

EX

47.97

0.08

0.35

0.08

100

510

.880

53.

0%2.

65.

216

.03.

55.

92.

216

.5

EX

51.02

0.08

0.35

0.08

100

128.

151

02.

7%2.

53.

411

.53.

96.

60.

32.

3

EX

63.47

0.08

0.35

0.08

100

98.

943

06.

7%3.

91.

810

.84.

06.

71.

18.

2

EX

79.52

0.09

0.36

0.09

100

510

.785

07.

0%4.

03.

614

.33.

66.

03.

120

.6

EX

80.24

0.48

0.65

0.48

502

5.0

120

5.0%

3.4

0.6

5.6

5.0

8.4

0.6

1.3

EX

93.50

0.08

0.35

0.08

100

89.

345

04.

0%3.

02.

511

.83.

96.

51.

18.

0

EX

104.40

0.11

0.37

0.11

100

411

.352

56.

7%3.

92.

213

.63.

76.

21.

710

.1

EX

110.22

0.52

0.68

0.52

502

4.7

150

4.0%

3.0

0.8

5.5

5.0

8.4

0.6

1.3

EX

120.53

0.08

0.35

0.08

100

411

.70

0.0%

0.0

0.0

11.7

4.0

6.8

0.2

1.3

* In

tens

ity e

quat

ions

ass

umes

a m

inim

um tr

avel

tim

e of

5 m

inut

es.

Cal

cula

ted

by:

Dat

e:C

heck

ed b

y:

TO

TA

L F

LO

WS

VA

S

EX

IST

ING

DR

AIN

AG

E C

AL

CU

LA

TIO

NS

LO

T 4

8, H

IGH

FO

RE

ST

RA

NC

H

CM

N

Fro

m D

CM

Tab

le 5

-1

7/17

/201

7

INT

EN

SIT

Y *

(Are

a D

rain

age

Sum

mar

y)F

rom

Are

a R

unof

f Coe

ffic

ient

Sum

mar

y

Che

cked

by:

VA

S

MS

CIV

IL, I

NC

.Lo

t 48

Hig

h F

ores

t Ran

ch (

Exi

stin

g) 7

0048

7/18

/201

7

Page 19: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

OV

ER

LA

ND

PIP

E /

CH

AN

NE

L F

LO

WIN

TE

NSI

TY

*T

OT

AL

FL

OW

S

DE

SIG

N P

OIN

TC

ON

TR

IBU

TIN

G B

ASI

NS

CA

5C

A10

0C

5L

engt

hH

eigh

tT

CL

engt

hSl

ope

Vel

ocit

yT

tT

OT

AL

Loc

atio

nI5

I 100

Q5

Q10

0

(ft)

(ft)

(min

)(f

t)(%

)(f

ps)

(min

)(m

in)

(in/

hr)

(in

/hr)

(c.f

.s.)

(c.f

.s.)

E1

EX

-10.

661.

4813

.13.

76.

32.

59.

3

E2

DP

E1,

EX

21.

393.

2213

.13.

76.

35.

220

.1

E3

DP

E2,

EX

3, E

X4

2.38

6.64

13.1

805

3.5%

2.8

4.8

17.9

3.3

5.5

7.7

36.3

E4

EX

50.

080.

3611

.53.

96.

60.

32.

3

E5

EX

60.

281.

2110

.84.

06.

71.

18.

2

E6

EX

70.

863.

4114

.33.

66.

03.

120

.6

E7

DP

E6,

EX

80.

983.

5614

.310

02.

0%2.

80.

614

.93.

55.

93.

521

.1

BA

SIN

EX

6 T

c U

SED

BA

SIN

EX

Tc

USE

D

Fro

m A

rea

Run

off C

oeff

icie

nt S

umm

ary

Tim

e of

Tra

vel (

Tt)

(Bas

in E

X1

Tc

Use

d)

BA

SIN

EX

5 T

c U

SED

BA

SIN

EX

7 T

c U

SED

(Bas

in E

X7

Tc

Use

d)

LO

T 4

8, H

IGH

FO

RE

ST

RA

NC

HE

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

INA

GE

CA

LC

UL

AT

ION

S(B

asin

Rou

ting

Su

mm

ary)

BA

SIN

EX

1 T

c U

SED

E8

EX

100.

471.

6313

.63.

76.

21.

710

.0

E9

DP

E8,

EX

110.

591.

7813

.610

01.

0%2.

00.

814

.43.

66.

02.

110

.7

E10

DP

E7,

DP

E9,

EX

9 1.

896.

7614

.956

03.

9%3.

03.

218

.03.

25.

46.

136

.8E

X12

Cal

cula

ted

by:

Dat

e:C

heck

ed b

y:V

AS

7/17

/201

7C

MN

BA

SIN

EX

10 T

c U

SED

(Bas

in E

X10

Tc

Use

d)

(DP-

7 T

c U

sed)

MS

CIV

IL, I

NC

.Lo

t 48

Hig

h F

ores

t Ran

ch (

Exi

stin

g) 7

0048

7/18

/201

7

Page 20: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

Inte

nsi

ty*

Flo

wP

ipe

Siz

e

PIP

EC

ontr

ibu

tin

gP

ipes

/Des

ign

Poi

nts

Equ

ival

ent

CA

5

Equ

ival

ent

CA

100

Max

imu

mT

CI

5I

100

Q5

Q10

0

1DPE1

0.66

1.48

13.1

3.7

6.3

2.5

9.3

Exi

stin

g 18

" C

MP

2DPE2

1.39

3.22

13.1

3.7

6.3

5.2

20.1

Exi

stin

g 24

" C

MP

3DPE6

0.86

3.41

14.3

3.6

6.0

3.1

20.6

Exi

stin

g 30

" C

MP

4DPE8

0.47

1.63

13.6

3.7

6.2

1.7

10.0

Exi

stin

g 21

" C

MP

* In

tens

ity

equa

tion

s as

sum

e a

min

imum

trav

el ti

me

of 5

min

utes

.C

alcu

late

d by

:D

P -

D

esig

n P

oint

Dat

e:E

X -

E

xist

ing

Des

ign

Poi

ntC

heck

ed b

y:IN

T-

Inte

rcep

ted

Flow

fro

m D

esig

n P

oint

VA

S

LO

T 4

8, H

IGH

FO

RE

ST

RA

NC

HE

XIS

TIN

G D

RA

INA

GE

CA

LC

UL

AT

ION

S(S

torm

Sew

er R

outi

ng S

um

mar

y)

CM

N F

B-

Flow

By

from

Des

ign

Poi

nt7/

17/2

017

MS

CIV

IL, I

NC

Lot 4

8 H

igh

For

est R

anch

(E

xist

ing)

700

487/

18/2

017

Page 21: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

PR

OP

OS

ED

DR

AIN

AG

E C

AL

CU

LA

TIO

NS

LO

T 4

8, H

IGH

FO

RE

ST

RA

NC

H

OV

ER

LA

ND

ST

RE

ET

/ C

HA

NN

EL

FL

OW

Tim

e of

Tra

vel (

Tt)

BASIN

AREA

TOTAL

C5

C100

C5

Length

Height

TC

Length

Slope

Velocity

Tt

TOTAL

I 5I 100

Q5

Q100

(Acr

es)

(ft)

(ft)

(min

)(f

t)(%

)(f

ps)

(min

)(m

in)

(in/

hr)

(in/

hr)

(c.f

.s.)

(c.f

.s.)

OS

13.42

0.19

0.43

0.19

100

59.

680

66.

6%3.

93.

513

.13.

76.

32.

59.

3

OS

24.11

0.18

0.42

0.18

100

78.

871

08.

3%4.

32.

711

.53.

96.

62.

911

.4

OS

31.29

0.27

0.49

0.27

100

87.

50

0.0%

0.0

0.0

7.5

4.6

7.7

1.6

4.9

A4.34

0.10

0.37

0.10

100

510

.637

53.

2%2.

72.

312

.93.

86.

31.

710

.1

OS

51.02

0.08

0.35

0.08

100

128.

151

02.

7%2.

53.

411

.53.

96.

60.

32.

3

B3.51

0.12

0.38

0.12

100

69.

838

53.

4%2.

82.

312

.13.

86.

51.

68.

6

C3.59

0.08

0.35

0.08

100

98.

943

06.

7%3.

91.

810

.84.

06.

71.

28.

5

OS

79.52

0.09

0.36

0.09

100

510

.785

07.

0%4.

03.

614

.33.

66.

03.

120

.6

OS

80.24

0.48

0.65

0.48

502

5.0

120

5.0%

3.4

0.6

5.6

5.0

8.4

0.6

1.3

D3.50

0.08

0.35

0.08

100

89.

345

04.

0%3.

02.

511

.83.

96.

51.

18.

0

OS

104.40

0.11

0.37

0.11

100

411

.352

56.

7%3.

92.

213

.63.

76.

21.

710

.1

OS

110.22

0.52

0.68

0.52

502

4.7

150

4.0%

3.0

0.8

5.5

5.0

8.4

0.6

1.3

OS

120.53

0.08

0.35

0.08

100

411

.70

0.0%

0.0

0.0

11.7

4.0

6.8

0.2

1.3

* In

tens

ity e

quat

ions

ass

umes

a m

inim

um tr

avel

tim

e of

5 m

inut

es.

Cal

cula

ted

by:

Dat

e:C

heck

ed b

y:

(Are

a D

rain

age

Sum

mar

y)F

rom

Are

a R

unof

f Coe

ffic

ient

Sum

mar

yT

OT

AL

FL

OW

S

VA

S

PR

OP

OS

ED

DR

AIN

AG

E C

AL

CU

LA

TIO

NS

CM

N

Fro

m D

CM

Tab

le 5

-1

7/17

/201

7

INT

EN

SIT

Y *

MS

CIV

IL, I

NC

.Lo

t 48

Hig

h F

ores

t Ran

ch (

Pro

pose

d) 7

0048

7/18

/201

7

Page 22: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

BASIN

TOTAL

AREA

TOTAL

AREA

AREA

C5

C100

AREA

C5

C100

AREA

C5

C100

C5

C100

(SF

)(A

cres

)(A

cres

)(A

cres

)(A

cres

)

OS1

1487

84.0

3.42

0.43

0.90

0.96

0.06

0.59

0.70

2.92

0.08

0.35

0.19

0.43

WE

IGH

TE

D

LO

T 4

8, H

IGH

FO

RE

ST

RA

NC

HP

RO

PO

SED

DR

AIN

AG

E C

AL

CU

LA

TIO

NS

(Are

a R

un

off

Coe

ffic

ient

Su

mm

ary)

ST

RE

ET

S /

DE

VE

LO

PE

DD

EV

EL

OP

ED

UN

DE

VE

LO

PE

D

OS1

1487

84.0

3.42

0.43

0.90

0.96

0.06

0.59

0.70

2.92

0.08

0.35

0.19

0.43

OS2

1791

06.0

4.11

0.43

0.90

0.96

0.06

0.90

0.96

3.63

0.08

0.35

0.18

0.42

OS3

5619

8.0

1.29

0.16

0.90

0.96

0.15

0.90

0.96

0.98

0.08

0.35

0.27

0.49

A18

9142

.04.

340.

110.

900.

960.

030.

300.

504.

200.

080.

350.

100.

37

OS5

4448

0.0

1.02

0.00

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

1.02

0.08

0.35

0.08

0.35

B15

2694

.03.

510.

140.

900.

960.

060.

730.

813.

310.

080.

350.

120.

38

C15

6214

3.59

0.00

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

3.59

0.08

0.35

0.08

0.35

OS7

4148

679.

520.

120.

900.

960.

000.

300.

509.

400.

080.

350.

090.

36

OS8

1037

00.

240.

120.

900.

960.

000.

300.

500.

120.

080.

350.

480.

65

D15

2487

3.50

0.00

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

3.50

0.08

0.35

0.08

0.35

OS1

019

1799

4.40

0.15

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

4.26

0.08

0.35

0.11

0.37

OS1

197

960.

220.

120.

900.

960.

000.

300.

500.

100.

080.

350.

520.

68

OS1

223

216

0.53

0.00

0.90

0.96

0.00

0.30

0.50

0.53

0.08

0.35

0.08

0.35

Cal

cula

ted

by:

Dat

e:C

heck

ed b

y:

CM

N7/

17/2

017

VA

S

MS

CIV

IL, I

NC

Lot 4

8 H

igh

For

est R

anch

(P

ropo

sed)

700

487/

18/2

017

Page 23: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

OV

ER

LA

ND

PIP

E /

CH

AN

NE

L F

LO

WIN

TE

NSI

TY

*T

OT

AL

FL

OW

S

DE

SIG

N P

OIN

TC

ON

TR

IBU

TIN

G B

ASI

NS

CA

5C

A10

0C

5L

engt

hH

eigh

tT

CL

engt

hSl

ope

Vel

ocit

yT

tT

OT

AL

Loc

atio

nI5

I 100

Q5

Q10

0

(ft)

(ft)

(min

)(f

t)(%

)(f

ps)

(min

)(m

in)

(in/

hr)

(in

/hr)

(c.f

.s.)

(c.f

.s.)

1O

S1

0.66

1.48

13.1

3.7

6.3

2.5

9.3

2D

P1,

OS2

1.39

3.22

13.1

3.7

6.3

5.2

20.1

2AD

P2,

OS3

, A2.

195.

4513

.147

53.

4%2.

82.

916

.03.

45.

87.

531

.3

Fro

m A

rea

Run

off C

oeff

icie

nt S

umm

ary

Tim

e of

Tra

vel (

Tt)

(Bas

in O

S1

Tc

Use

d)

LO

T 4

8, H

IGH

FO

RE

ST

RA

NC

HP

RO

PO

SED

DR

AIN

AG

E C

AL

CU

LA

TIO

NS

(Bas

in R

outi

ng S

um

mar

y)

BA

SIN

EX

1 T

c U

SED

BA

SIN

EX

Tc

USE

D

3D

P2A

, B2.

626.

7816

.037

03.

2%2.

72.

318

.33.

25.

48.

436

.7

4O

S5

0.08

0.36

11.5

3.9

6.6

0.3

2.3

5C

0.29

1.26

10.8

4.0

6.7

1.2

8.5

6O

S7

0.86

3.41

14.3

3.6

6.0

3.1

20.6

7D

P6,

D0.

983.

5614

.310

02.

0%2.

80.

614

.93.

55.

93.

521

.1

8O

S10

0.47

1.63

13.6

3.7

6.2

1.7

10.0

9D

P8,

OS1

10.

591.

7813

.610

01.

0%2.

00.

814

.43.

66.

02.

110

.7

10D

P7,

DP

9, O

S9

1.89

6.76

14.9

560

3.9%

3.0

3.2

18.0

3.2

5.4

6.1

36.8

OS

12

Cal

cula

ted

by:

Dat

e:C

heck

ed b

y:V

AS

7/17

/201

7C

MN

(DP2

A T

c U

sed)

BA

SIN

EX

5 T

c U

SED

BA

SIN

EX

6 T

c U

SED

BA

SIN

EX

7 T

c U

SED

(Bas

in O

S7

Tc

Use

d)

BA

SIN

EX

10 T

c U

SED

(Bas

in O

S10

Tc

Use

d)

(DP7

Tc

Use

d)

MS

CIV

IL, I

NC

.Lo

t 48

Hig

h F

ores

t Ran

ch (

Pro

pose

d) 7

0048

7/18

/201

7

Page 24: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

Inte

nsi

ty*

Flo

wP

ipe

Siz

e

PIP

EC

ontr

ibu

tin

gP

ipes

/Des

ign

Poi

nts

Equ

ival

ent

CA

5

Equ

ival

ent

CA

100

Max

imu

mT

CI

5I

100

Q5

Q10

0

LO

T 4

8, H

IGH

FO

RE

ST

RA

NC

HP

RO

PO

SE

D D

RA

INA

GE

CA

LC

UL

AT

ION

S(S

torm

Sew

er R

outi

ng S

um

mar

y)

1DP1

0.66

1.48

13.1

3.7

6.3

2.5

9.3

Exi

stin

g 18

" C

MP

2DP2

1.39

3.22

13.1

3.7

6.3

5.2

20.1

Exi

stin

g 24

" C

MP

3DP6

0.86

3.41

14.3

3.6

6.0

3.1

20.6

Exi

stin

g 30

" C

MP

4DP8

0.47

1.63

13.6

3.7

6.2

1.7

10.0

Exi

stin

g 21

" C

MP

5DP2A

2.19

5.45

16.0

3.4

5.8

7.5

31.3

Pro

pose

d 36

" R

CP

* In

tens

ity

equa

tion

s as

sum

e a

min

imum

trav

el ti

me

of 5

min

utes

.C

alcu

late

d by

:D

P -

D

esig

n P

oint

Dat

e:E

X -

E

xist

ing

Des

ign

Poi

ntC

heck

ed b

y:IN

T-

Inte

rcep

ted

Flow

fro

m D

esig

n P

oint

VA

S

CM

N F

B-

Flow

By

from

Des

ign

Poi

nt7/

17/2

017

MS

CIV

IL, I

NC

Lot 4

8 H

igh

For

est R

anch

(P

ropo

sed)

700

487/

18/2

017

Page 25: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

 

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

Page 26: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that
Page 27: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that
Page 28: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that
Page 29: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN

Page 30: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that
Page 31: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP

Page 32: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that
Page 33: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that

PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP

Page 34: EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO · and Surveyors, dated May 2001, and thus shall not adversely affect the downstream development. EROSION CONTROL It is the policy of the El Paso County that