elective colorectal resection – how to hasten the recovery? dr. lily ng rhtsk

43
Elective Colorectal Resection – How to Hasten the Recovery? Dr. Lily Ng RHTSK

Upload: anna-russell

Post on 24-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Elective Colorectal Resection – How to Hasten the Recovery?

Dr. Lily NgRHTSK

Background Elective colorectal resection is comm

on operation in general Surgery Laparoscopic / Laparoscopic-assisted

resection was known to be associated with a faster recovery by reducing pain and post-op ileus

Means to hasten recovery in open resection

Conventional Management No standard protocol Wide variations in

Use of Peri-operative Pain Control Use of Tubes, Drains and Catheters Timing of Feeding Timing of Mobilization

Depends on attending anaesthetist, surgeon, physiotherapist and nursing staff

Means to Hasten Recovery

Use of Perioperative Pain Control Use of Tubes, Drains and Catheters Timing of Feeding Timing of Mobilization

Peri-operative Pain Control Wide variation

Systemic opioid e.g. PCA Epidural anaesthesia

Opioid LA Opioid – LA mixture

Best if provide best pain control, without increasing undesirable side effects or post-op ileus

Effects of Peri-operative Analgesic Technique on Rate of Recovery after Colon Surgery

Liu, Spencer S. MD, et al.Anaesthesiology Vol 83(4), Oct 1995, p757-765

Results – Pain score

P<0.01

Anaesthesiology Vol 83(4), Oct 1995, p757-765

Results – Return of GI function and LOS

Anaesthesiology Vol 83(4), Oct 1995, p757-765

Conclusion

Use of epidural analgesia with bupivacaine or bupivacaine and morphine: Best balance of analgesia and side effects Faster recovery of GI function Shorter time to fulfill discharge criteria

Anaesthesiology Vol 83(4), Oct 1995, p757-765

Means to Hasten Recovery

Use of Perioperative Pain Control Use of Tubes, Drains and Catheters Timing of Feeding Timing of Mobilization

NG Tube Decompression Prophylactic nasogastric decompression aft

er laparotomy was common Underlying reasons:

? Hasten return of bowel function ? Reduce risk of aspiration thus pulmonary com

plications ? Decrease patient discomfort by lessen abdomi

nal distension ? Protect anastomoses and prevent anastomoti

c leakage

Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal s

urgery [Review]

Nelson, R, et alThe cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The Cochrane collaboration Vol (4) 2005

Results - Time to Flatus

The Cochrane collaboration Vol (4) 2005

Results – Complications

The Cochrane collaboration Vol (4) 2005

Pulmonary Complication

Anastomotic Leakage

Conclusion

Routine NG decompression in elective colonic surgery Slower return of GI function No significant difference in terms of pulm

onary complication / anastomotic leakage

Routine NG decompression is not recommended

The Cochrane collaboration Vol (4) 2005

Means to Hasten Recovery

Use of Perioperative Anaesthesia and Analgesia

Use of Tubes, Drains and Catheters Timing of Feeding Timing of Mobilization

Anastomotic Drainage Prophylactic anastomotic drainage was co

mmonly used worldwide Intention to:

Prevent accumulation of fluids in pelvic or peritoneal cavity

Permit early detection of anastomotic dehiscence

Treat or ?prevent anastomotic dehiscence

Can it really improve the outcome?

Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery [Review] Jesus, EC, et al

ResultsDrain No Drain 95%CI

Mortality 3% 4% 0.39-1.31 Anastomotic dehiscence

Clinical 2% 1% 0.61-3.95 Radiological 3% 4% 0.42-1.61

Wound infection 5% 5% 0.60-1.76 Re-intervention 6% 5% 0.73-2.05 Extra-abdominal Cx 7% 6% 0.66-1.85

The Cochrane Collaboration Vol (4) 2005

Conclusion

No evidence that prophylactic anastomotic drainage in colorectal surgery can decrease mortality or other post-op complications

Prophylactic anastomotic drainage is not recommended

The Cochrane Collaboration Vol (4) 2005

Means to Hasten Recovery

Use of Perioperative Anaesthesia and Analgesia

Use of Tubes, Drains and Catheters Timing of Feeding Timing of Mobilization

Urinary Catheterization To prevent post-op urinary retention

esp. those with epidural anaelgesia Prolong catheterization increase risk

of UTI Optimal duration is unknown Common practice: catheter was kept

at least until epidural analgesia was taken off

Is urinary Drainage Necessary During Continuous Epidural Analgesia After Colonic Resection ? Linda Basse, et al

Patients were put on urinary drainage for 24 hours and epidural analgesia for 48 hours

Results Urinary retention 9% (CI 2%-16%)

Urinary tract infection 4% Voiding complaint at D30 0% (CI 0%-3.6%)

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Vol 25 No 5, 2000; p498-501

Conclusion

Routine urinary bladder catheterization is not required despite ongoing continuous thoracic epidural analgesia

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Vol 25 No 5, 2000; p498-501

Means to Hasten Recovery

Use of Perioperative Pain Control Use of Tubes, Drains and Catheters Timing of Feeding Timing of Mobilization

Post-op Enteral Feeding No consensus in the timing of

feeding Two schools of thoughts

NG catheter and fasting until passage of flatus,

No NG tube and allow oral intake soon after operation

Early Oral Feeding After Colorectal Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study Carlo V. Feo, et al

ANZ J. Surg. 2004; 74: 298-301

Conclusion

Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection can be started on oral feeding on the first post-op day

Early post-op oral feeding was safe without increase in post-op complications

ANZ J. Surg. 2004; 74: 298-301

Summary

Means to Hasten Recovery Epidural analgesia provides good pain co

ntrol No routine use of nasogastric tube / anas

tomotic drainage Routine urinary catheterization is not nec

essary despite use of epidural Early enteral feeding is safe

Fast Track Surgery Multimodal rehabilitation program

Pre-operative patient education Newer anaesthetic, analgesic and surgica

l techniques Aggressive post-operative rehabilitation

Early enteral nutrition Early mobilization Minimal use of tubes, drains and catheters

Aim to shorten time to recovery

A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection Linda Basse, et al. A prospective study to test for feasibili

ty of a 48-hour postoperative stay program after colonic resection

Well-defined post-op care program

Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia Enforced early mobilization Early enteral nutrition Planned 48-hour post-op hospital stay

Ann Surg July 2000

Ann Surg July 2000

Results

Ann Surg July 2000

Return of GI Function Length of Hospital Stay

95% patient defecate within 48 hrs

Median LOS: 2 days

Conclusion

Multimodal rehabilitation program may significantly reduce Post-op ileus Post-op hospital stay

Ann Surg July 2000

Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical c

are in patients undergoing

major colonic resection

M. Gatt, et alBJS 2005; 92: 1354-1362

Optimization Package

BJS 2005; 92: 1354-1362

Outcome Measures Physiological Function Psychological Function

Pain Score Gut Function

Time to tolerate diet Clinical Outcome

Length of hospital Stay Complications and death Need for readmission

BJS 2005; 92: 1354-1362

Results

P=0.042

BJS 2005; 92: 1354-1362

Return of GI function

P=0.027

Length of Hospital Stay

Post-op Morbidity / Mortality

BJS 2005; 92: 1354-1362

Conclusion

Use of multimodal opitmization Earlier return of GI function Shorter length of hospital stay No increase in post-op morbidity / mortal

ity

BJS 2005; 92: 1354-1362

Summary Revision of traditional surgical care program

s, Minimal use of tubes, drains, bladder catheter Optimal pain relief with continuous thoracic epi

dural analgesic with LA and opioids, Early enteral nutrition Enforced mobilzation

may enhance recovery after elective colonic resection.

In future, large randomized or multi-center studies, using identical protocols should be conducted

Our Experience at RHTSK Objective: To develop a standardized treat

ment protocol (clinical pathway) in managing patients who undergo elective colorectal resection

All patients undergoing elective colorectal resection with anastomosis during Jun 2005 to Aug 2005 (total 13 patients) were compared with those during Sept 2003 to Aug 2004 (total 37 patients)

Results – No. of Days (median)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Epidural Catheter

Urinary Catheter

N-G tube

Sips of Water

Fluid Diet

Normal Diet

Sitting out

Walking Exercise

Post-op length of stay

Day (Median)

~ The End ~