electric motor thermal management r&d end winding . rotor . ... • the rate of decrease in the...

29
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Electric Motor Thermal Management R&D Kevin Bennion Organization: NREL Email: [email protected] Phone: 303-275-4447 Team members/collaborators: Justin Cousineau, Charlie King, Gilbert Moreno, Caitlin Stack (NREL) Tim Burress, Andy Wereszczak (ORNL) DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Electric Drive Technologies FY15 Kickoff Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee November 18 – 20, 2014 This presentation does not contain any proprietary or confidential information. NREL/PR-5400-63004

Upload: hoanganh

Post on 30-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Electric Motor Thermal Management R&D

Kevin Bennion Organization: NREL Email: [email protected] Phone: 303-275-4447 Team members/collaborators: Justin Cousineau, Charlie King, Gilbert Moreno, Caitlin Stack (NREL) Tim Burress, Andy Wereszczak (ORNL)

DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Electric Drive Technologies FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee November 18 – 20, 2014

This presentation does not contain any proprietary or confidential information.

NREL/PR-5400-63004

2

Thermal Management Enables More Efficient and Cost-Effective Motors

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

State of the Art • Water-ethylene glycol stator

cooling jacket • Automatic transmission fluid

(ATF) impingement on motor end windings

Why Motor Cooling • Current Density

o Size o Weight o Cost

• Material Costs o Magnets o Rare-earth materials o Price variability

• Reliability • Efficiency

Stator Cooling Jacket

Stator End Winding

Rotor Stator

Photo Credit: Kevin Bennion, NREL

Photo Credit: Kevin Bennion, NREL

3

Passive and Active Cooling

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Passive Thermal

Stack

Active Convective

Cooling

Motor Thermal

Management

Passive Thermal Stack •Motor geometry •Material thermal properties •Thermal interfaces

Active Convective Cooling •Cooling location •Heat transfer coefficients •Available coolant •Parasitic power

Photo Credit: Kevin Bennion, NREL

4

Challenges

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Stator Laminations

Slot Winding

Rotor Laminations Rotor

Hub

Case

Air Gap

Stator-Case Contact

Nozzle/Orifice

ATF Impingement

Shaft ATF Flow

ATF Flow

Stator Cooling Jacket

End Winding

Motor Axis

Motor Cooling Section View

4

1

1

2 3

5

6

Problem Extracting heat from within the motor to protect the motor and enable high power density

Challenges 1. Orthotropic (direction

dependent) thermal conductivity of lamination stacks

2. Orthotropic thermal conductivity of slot windings

3. Orthotropic thermal conductivity of end windings

4. Convective heat transfer coefficients for ATF cooling

5. Thermal contact resistance of stator-case contact

6. Cooling jacket performance

5

Proposed Research Objectives

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Problem

Core Thermal Capabilities and Research Tasks

Objective Support broad industry demand for data, analysis methods, and experimental techniques to improve and better understand motor thermal management

Stator Laminations

Slot Winding

Rotor Laminations Rotor

Hub

Case

Air Gap

Stator-Case Contact

Nozzle/Orifice

ATF Impingement

Shaft ATF Flow

ATF Flow

Stator Cooling Jacket

End Winding

Motor Axis

Motor Cooling Section View

6

Research Focus

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

•Measure convective heat transfer coefficients for ATF cooling of end windings •Measure interface thermal resistances

and orthotropic thermal conductivity of materials

Support broad industry demand for data to improve and better understand motor thermal management

Objective

Research Tasks

Automatic Transmission Fluid Heat Transfer

Material and Thermal Interface Testing

Photo Credit: Jana Jeffers, NREL

Photo Credit: Justin Cousineau, NREL

7

Active Cooling

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Measure heat transfer coefficients

for ATF cooling of end windings

Direct Impingement on Target Surfaces

Impingement on Motor End Windings

Average Heat Transfer Coefficients • Establish credibility of experiment and data through comparison of plain target

surface results to existing correlations in literature • Produce new data for textured surfaces representative of end-winding wire

bundles Spatial Mapping of Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient

• Jet local convective heat transfer • Large-scale end-winding convective heat transfer mapping

Photo Credit: Jana Jeffers, NREL Photo Credit: Kevin Bennion, NREL

Accomplishments to Date – FY14

8

ATF Impingement Target Surfaces

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Baseline 18 AWG 22 AWG 26 AWG

Radius (wire and insulation), mm

N/A 0.547 0.351 0.226

Total wetted surface area, mm2 126.7 148.2 143.3 139.2

• ATF impingement baseline target is plain, polished copper with 600-grit sandpaper • Additional targets mimic wire bundles with insulation (18, 22, and 26 AWG)

AWG = American Wire Gauge

18 AWG 22 AWG 26 AWG Credit: Gilbert Moreno, NREL

9

Comparison to Plain Surface Correlations

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

0 2 4 6 8 10

Hea

t tra

nsfe

r coe

ffici

ent (

W/m

2 -K

)

Jet velocity (m/s)

50°C70°C90°CMetzger et al., 1974 (90°C)Ma et al., 1997 (50°C)Ma et al., 1997 (70°C)Ma et al., 1997 (90°C)Leland and Pais, 1999 (50°C)Leland and Pais, 1999 (70°C)Leland and Pais, 1999 (90°C)

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Comparison of test results to literature correlations on flat target surface

ATF fluid properties provided by Ford

10

Spatial Mapping of Heat Transfer

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

• Jet impingement heat transfer coefficients are not uniform over the entire cooled surface

• The highest heat transfer coefficients occur at the jet impact zone

• The rate of decrease in the heat transfer coefficient is unknown

Heated surface

Stagnation zone

Wall jet zone

d, nozzle diameter

Tw

Liquid jet

Air

r / d

Heat transfer coefficient

Local convective heat transfer coefficient

11

TLC Experimental Apparatus • Fabricated a test section to spatially

measure jet impingement heat transfer coefficients on a discrete heat source.

• Initial tests will be conducted using thermochromic liquid crystals (TLCs), followed by infrared imaging

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

vessel ATF inlet

2-mm-diameter nozzle

Test article fixture

Foil: heated via joule heating

Lexan insulation/support

Bus bars

Test article cross-sectional view

Teflon insulation/ support

Test article bottom view

Bottom side view of heated foil with camera

12

Passive Thermal Stack

Measure interface thermal resistances and

orthotropic thermal conductivity of materials

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Material Measurements

Effective Thermal Properties for Motor Design and Simulation

Stacked lamination thermal conductivity • Quantified thermal contact resistance between motor laminations • Supports improved thermal models for motor design and thermal analysis

Winding effective thermal properties • Initiated work to measure orthotropic thermal properties • Supports improved thermal models for motor design • Enables analysis to improve thermal properties of motor materials

Case-to-stator thermal contact resistance • Developed ability to measure case-to-stator thermal contact resistance

Photo Credit: Kevin Bennion, NREL Photo Credit: Justin Cousineau, NREL

Accomplishments to Date – FY14

13

Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Measured Stack Thermal Resistance

Lamination-to-Lamination Thermal Contact Resistance

Effective Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

Cold Plate

Hot Plate

Copper Spreader

Copper Spreader

Copper Metering Block

Copper Metering Block

Lamination Stack

Thermal Grease

Thermal Grease

Force Applied

Photo Credit: Justin Cousineau, NREL

14

Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

Measured Stack Thermal Resistance

Lamination-to-Lamination Thermal Contact Resistance

Effective Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mea

sure

d La

min

atio

n St

ack

Ther

mal

Res

istan

ce (m

m²-

K/W

]

Number of Contacts

M19 29 Gauge, 138 kPa Data

Data with Systematic Error

Weighted Curve Fit

• Lamination-to-lamination thermal contact resistance calculated from slope of weighted curve fit

Cold Plate

Hot Plate

Copper Spreader

Copper Spreader

Copper Metering Block

Copper Metering Block

Lamination Stack

Thermal Grease

Thermal Grease

Force Applied

Error bars represent 95% confidence level 14

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

15

Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

• The lamination-to-lamination thermal contact resistance is affected by the surface topography and contact pressure

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

138 276 414 552

Lam

inat

ion-

to-L

amin

atio

n Th

erm

al C

onta

ct R

esist

ance

[m

m²-

K/W

]

Pressure [kPa]

M19 26 Gauge

M19 29 Gauge

HF10

Arnon7

Error bars represent 95% confidence level 15

Measured Stack Thermal Resistance

Lamination-to-Lamination Thermal Contact Resistance

Effective Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

16

Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

1.51.71.92.12.32.52.72.93.13.3

0 10 20 30 40 50Thro

ugh-

Stac

k Th

erm

al C

ondu

ctiv

ity

[W/m

-K]

Number of Laminations (NL)

M19 29 Gauge, 138 kPa Example

Effective Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

Asymptote (𝑁𝑁𝐿𝐿 → ∞)

• The effective through-stack thermal conductivity approaches the asymptote within 30–50 laminations

16

Measured Stack Thermal Resistance

Lamination-to-Lamination Thermal Contact Resistance

Effective Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

17

Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting 17

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

0 200 400 600

Asym

ptot

ic T

hrou

gh-S

tack

The

rmal

Co

nduc

tivity

[W/m

-K]

Pressure [kPa]

M19 26 Gauge

M19 29 Gauge

HF10

Arnon7

Error bars represent 95% confidence level

Measured Stack Thermal Resistance

Lamination-to-Lamination Thermal Contact Resistance

Effective Through-Stack Thermal Conductivity

• Asymptotic thermal conductivity increases with pressure

• Asymptotic thermal conductivity depends on inter-lamination thermal contact resistance, lamination thermal conductivity, and lamination thickness

18

In-Plane Lamination Thermal Conductivity

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

1. Based on measured thermal conductivity of similar material 2. Calculated assuming 99% stacking factor 3. Average of measured orthotropic property in setup shown in figure

21.9 21.7 21.8

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

BulkMaterial

CalculatedValue

Measured

In-P

lane

The

rmal

Con

duct

ivity

[W/m

-K]

M19 29 Gauge Laminations

1 2

3

Photo Credit: Justin Cousineau, NREL

• Confirmed in-plane thermal conductivity is close to bulk material thermal conductivity

19

FY15 Tasks to Achieve Key Deliverable

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

2014

Oct

Nov

Dec

2015

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

ATF impingement experiments to measure variation in local convective heat transfer coefficients

Deliverable

Publications for End-

Winding Heat Transfer

Go/ No-Go

Select passive thermal materials for bench-level testing in partnership with ORNL

End-winding spatial mapping of ATF convective heat transfer coefficients on end-winding features

Thermal measurements of passive thermal stack elements in collaboration with Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) • Winding thermal properties • Contact interfaces • Thermal analysis support in collaboration with ORNL

motor research

20

Local ATF Jet Heat Transfer Mapping

111°C

64°C

Bottom view of test article Heated foil temperature distribution

Thermal-electrical finite element analysis (FEA) reveals edge effects mostly associated with copper bus bars • ∆T across foil 47°C (most of heat loss to copper bars) • 85% of foil heater power dissipated by jet

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Spatially measure jet impingement heat transfer coefficients on a discrete heat source.

21

Local ATF Jet Heat Transfer Mapping

Bottom view of test article Heated foil temperature distribution

Use of guard heaters minimize edge effects through the use of guard heaters • ∆T across foil 7°C (heat loss to copper decreased) • 98% of foil heater power dissipated by jet

Guard heaters 112°C

105°C

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Spatially measure jet impingement heat transfer coefficients on a discrete heat source.

22

Spatial Mapping of Heat Transfer

• Map the large-scale spatial distribution of the heat transfer coefficients over motor end windings

• Study effects of

o Oil jet placement

o ATF free flow over end-winding surfaces

o Jet interactions

Large-scale end-winding convective heat transfer mapping

Photo Credit: Kevin Bennion, NREL

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

23

Spatial Mapping of Heat Transfer

• Target surfaces installed on three surfaces to measure heat transfer coefficients o Outside diameter surface o Inside diameter surface o Axial end surface

Custom heat transfer sensor package in end winding

Large-scale end-winding convective heat transfer mapping

Example ATF jets

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

24

Spatial Mapping of Heat Transfer

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

ATF jets

2

1

Large-scale end-winding convective heat transfer mapping

1. Fluid Jet Geometry • Location and

orientation of ATF fluid jets

• Nozzle type/geometry • System flow rate • Jet velocity • Parasitic power

2. Relative positon between measured heat transfer and jet location • Impact of gravity and

free fluid flow • Fluid interactions

between jets

25

Passive Thermal Stack

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

• Case thermal contact resistance o Case surface characteristics

• Slot and end-winding effective thermal conductivity

• Potting materials for end-winding cooling

Sample Case-Stator Contact Surface for Motor Cooling

Example Interference Fit with Stator and Cooling Jacket Case Sample Motor End Windings

Photo Credits Kevin Bennion, NREL

26

Publications: K. Bennion and J. Cousineau, “Sensitivity Analysis of Traction Drive Motor Cooling,” in IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), 2012, pp. 1–6.

Project Summary

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

Project Duration: FY14–FY16 Overall Objective: Provide data to support broad Industry demand for improving motor thermal management FY14 Focus: Characterized ATF impingement average heat transfer coefficients and completed lamination-to-lamination thermal contact resistance measurements

Deliverable: Completed measurement of average convective heat transfer coefficients with ATF and compared results of plain surface data to correlations in the open literature. Completed lamination-to-lamination thermal contact measurements and stack effective thermal conductivity

Go/No-Go: Developed test apparatus to measure local impingement heat transfer results with ability to measure local heat transfer coefficients. Developed test hardware design and plan for representative wire bundle geometries

FY15 Focus: Spatially map ATF impingement convective heat transfer coefficients and measure passive thermal stack thermal resistances

Deliverable: Publish end-winding heat transfer performance data

Go/No-Go: In collaboration with ORNL select passive thermal stack materials for bench-level thermal testing

FY16 Focus: Confirm convective heat transfer performance on in-situ motor thermal performance tests.

Deliverable: Report heat transfer performance and model validation

Go/No-Go: Complete in-situ motor thermal tests for ATF cooling

27

Technology-to-Market Plan

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

• This research impacts industry needs because … o The heat flow, temperature distribution, and fluid dynamics for motor

thermal management are complex problems o Data on cooling convective heat transfer coefficients and heat spreading

within the motor are needed to improve motor performance within cost, efficiency, and reliability constraints

• This research is on the path to commercialization because … o The research is reviewed by and shared with industry experts o The data are used by industry experts in the analysis and design of electric

motors

28

Partners/Collaborators

DOE APEEM FY15 Kickoff Meeting

• Industry o Motor industry suppliers, end users, and researchers

– Input on research and test plans – Sharing of experimental data, modeling results, and analysis methods – Companies providing research input, requesting data, or supplying data

include: Ford, Chrysler, GM, Tesla, UQM Technologies, Remy, Magna, John Deere, Oshkosh

• Other Government Laboratories o ORNL

– Support from benchmarking activities – Collaboration on motor designs to reduce or eliminate rare-earth

materials – Collaboration on materials with improved thermal properties

Potting materials for end windings for improved heat transfer Slot winding materials

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

For more information, contact:

Principal Investigator Kevin Bennion [email protected] Phone: (303)275-4447 APEEM Task Leader: Sreekant Narumanchi [email protected] Phone: (303)275-4062

Acknowledgments:

Susan Rogers and Steven Boyd U.S. Department of Energy

Team Members:

Justin Cousineau Charlie King Gilbert Moreno Caitlin Stack Tim Burress (ORNL) Andy Wereszczak (ORNL)