electric pulse fishing what do we know and what is the research agenda? 17-11-2014, a.d. rijnsdorp...

31
Electric pulse fishing What do we know and what is the research agenda? 17-11-2014, A.D. Rijnsdorp & M.M.M. Rasenberg [email protected]

Upload: caleb-marshman

Post on 15-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Electric pulse fishing

What do we know and what is the research agenda?

17-11-2014, A.D. Rijnsdorp & M.M.M. Rasenberg

[email protected]

Introduction

Background

Beam trawl fishery for flatfish (sole & plaice)

●Tickler chain impact on sea bed and benthos

●Small mesh large bycatch of undersized fish

●High fuel cost (heavy gear and high towing speed)

Pulse trawl

●Since 2009 based on temporary licences

●Indications of an increase of sole catches & decrease bycatch (fish and benthos)

●Reduction in fuel costs: about 50% (lighter gear and lower towing speed)

Regulation

1988 2001 2011 20142007

No. of pulse trawlers in the Netherlands

1-Ja

n-09

1-Ju

l-09

1-Ja

n-10

1-Ju

l-10

1-Ja

n-11

1-Ju

l-11

1-Ja

n-12

1-Ju

l-12

1-Ja

n-13

1-Ju

l-13

1-Ja

n-14

1-Ju

l-14

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90N

um

ber

of

acti

ve v

essels

84 licences

Experimental phase

Targeting flatfish & shrimp

isolator

conductor

Electric field: non homogeneous

V/mV/m

V/m

Conductor

Isollator

Pulse parameters

Pulse type

●Delmeco

●HFK

Amplitude (V)

Frequency (Hz)

Pulse width (ms)

Current settings

40-80 Hz, 120 V

Amplitude(V)

Frequency (Hz)

Pulse width (µs)

DELMECO

HFK

Concerns

Possible adverse effect of electricity on marine organisms

●Mortality

●Injuries

●Ulcers

Increase in fishing efficiency and risk of over-exploitation

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

% V

oo

rko

men

Zweren op schar

Totaal letsels zweren

% dab with ulcers (Belgian coast)

(ILVO: Devriese, L., 2014)

No evidence that this is caused by the pulse technique

What do we know?

Conducted research

Research started in 1998 and focussed on:

●Catch efficiency & selectivity

●Catch composition

●Effect of electricity on marine organisms

●Ecosystem effects

Catch efficiency & selectivity

Comparative fishing experiment in 2011: TX36 (HFK), TX68 (Delmeco), GO4 (Tickler chain beam trawl)

Van Marlen et al. (2014) Fisheries Research

Catch efficiency

Tickler chain n=33

Pulse n=2*33

Ratio Puls

/tickler

Plaice (kg/hectare) 1.34 1.26 94%

Sole (kg/hectare) 0.59 0.61 103%

Landings(baskets / hectare) 0.10 0.08 81%

Discards (baskets / hectare) 0.59 0.25 43%

Van Marlen et al. 2014

Selectivity (plaice & sole):

lower by-catch undersized flatfish

Van Marlen et al. 2014

Schol

Tong

Catch per unit area sweptPulse / Tickler chain

1:1

Puls lower

Puls higher

Catch composition

Self-sampling & observer program

December 2011 - March 2013

25 pulse trawl vessels

Type of fishery

Plaice Sole

L DC %DC L DC %DC

Pulse self-sampling

37 27 42% 35 6 15%

Pulse observer

61 66 52% 32 4 10%

Beam trawl (DCF)

90 87 49% 29 6 17%

Rasenberg et al., 2013, IMARES report C122/13

Effects on marine organisms

Lab experiments (ILVO, University Gent, IMARES)

Exposure 2 sec

●Cod & Sole & Dogfish

●Brown shrimp & Nereis

Measurements

●Survival (2 weeks) & behaviour

●Macroscopic

●X-ray & Histology Uni Gent: Marieke Depestele; Maarten Soetaert; Annemie Decostere; ILVO: Hans Polet;IMARES: Dick de Haan; Bob van Marlen

Experiments:effects on COD

Wild cod

● 4% (1/25)

Aquaculture cod

● 0% (0/145)

● 2% (1/53)

●17% (5/29)

●48% (125/260) large cod

●0% (0/122) small cod

Results of the effect studies

Behavioural response Injuries Mortality FeedingCod Escape (<20 Hz)

Cramp (>20Hz)Epileptic (120V)

Fractures Haemorrhages

No Resume normal feeding

Sole Escape (<20 Hz) Cramp (>20Hz)

Epileptic (extreme)

None No Resume normal feeding

Dog-fish Escape None No Resume feeding; deposition viable

eggsShrimp Jump (<20 Hz)

Cramp (>20Hz)None No -

Nereis movement None No -

Depestele et al (in prep); Soetaert et al (2014) ICES JMS; De Haan et al. (in prep)

Effects on dab: experiment to study ulcers

Three groups of 50 dab

Maximal exposure

●DELMECO (60V)

●HFK (70V)

●Reference group (not exposed)

After 1 week killed and examined for lesions, ulcers, wounds, parasites

No ‘injuries’ observed

de Haan et al (in prep)

Ecosystem effects compared to traditional beam trawl

Reduction in

●Bycatch of undersized fish

●Bycatch of benthic invertebrates

●Penetration depth

Trawl path mortality

●Under study

Change in distribution pattern

●Consequences to be studied

Upscaling experimental results to fleet level

Change distribution pulse trawlers:consequences for ecosystem effects

Tickler chain beam trawls

Pulse trawls

What is still unknown?

Knowledge gaps

Effect on physiology marine organisms (what & why!)

●What type of organisms are sensitive?

●Sensitivity of different life stages

●What is long-term effect on organisms that are exposed repeatedly?

●Effect on electro sense organs (rays and sharks)

Effect on geo-chemistry

●Electrolysis (release of nutrients or contaminants)

Effect on functioning benthic ecosystem

Upscaling effects to fleet level and ecosystem level

Management challenges

What is the range of pulse parameters that is safe for marine organisms?

Technological creep and its implications for sustainable management

Application pulse technique in other fisheries

How to control and enforce the application of pulse techniques?

Research agenda

I. Governance research

II. Economic performances

III.Control and enforcement

IV. Ecological effects (in relation with the technique)

Ecological effects: impact assessment

1. Effect on the by-catch of undersized fish

2. Effect of the use of electricity on marine organisms and the marine ecosystem

3. The development of the pulse technique

1. By-catch of undersized fish

To what extend does the by-catch of undersized fish change when the sole and plaice quota are fished with a fleet of pulse vessels compared to a fleet of traditional beam trawl vessels?

Sub-project 1: Change in by-catch of undersized fish

1.3 Distribution (logbook data, VMS)

1.1 Catch efficiency & selectivity

1.2 Discards monitoring

(part of DCF)

2. Effect of electricity on marine organisms and the marine ecosystem

2.1. PhD-1Lab experiments fish & benthos

2.2. PhD-2Ecosystem functioning

2.3. PhD-3Modelling fleet dynamics & ecosystem functioning

Sub-project 2: Effect of electricity on marine organisms and the ecosystem

2.4. Field experiments:

Effect on seabed ecosystem

2.5. Field strength measurements in

situ

3. Development of the pulse technique

Pulse technique is still under development

Changes must be monitored

Synthesis: Impact assessment of the Dutch North Sea pulse trawl fishery targeting flatfish

Sub-project 3: Monitoring the development of

the pulse technique

Sub-project 1: Change in by-catch of undersized fish

1.3 Distribution (logbook data,

VMS)

1.1 Catch efficiency & selectivity

1.2 Discards monitoring

(part of DCF)

2.1. PhD-1Lab

experiments fish & benthos

2.2. PhD-2Ecosystem functioning

2.3. PhD-3Modelling fleet

dynamics & ecosystem functioning

Sub-project 2: Effect of electricity on marine organisms and the ecosystem

2.4. Field experiments: Effect on sea-

bed ecosystem

2.5. Field strength measurements in

situ

Questions or feedback?