electricity advisory committee - energy.gov · sgig progress - jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of...

9
Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Electricity Advisory Committee Hank Kenchington - Deputy Assistant Secretary March 27, 2015

Upload: others

Post on 20-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Electricity Advisory Committee - Energy.gov · SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion Progress as

Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability

Electricity Advisory Committee

Hank Kenchington - Deputy Assistant Secretary March 27, 2015

Page 2: Electricity Advisory Committee - Energy.gov · SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion Progress as

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

Challenging times – looking back at 2009

2

Dow Jones Average 2005 - March 2015

2009 2009

2009

Page 3: Electricity Advisory Committee - Energy.gov · SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion Progress as

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

Recovery Act – Smart Grid Programs

3

Originally authorized by the Energy Infrastructure Security Act 2007, EISA 1306 and EISA 1304

One-Time Appropriation: $4.5 Billion Recovery Act Funds

Page 4: Electricity Advisory Committee - Energy.gov · SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion Progress as

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

ARRA Smart Grid Strategy

Continued Grid

Modernization Investments

Goal: Catalyze and accelerate grid modernization across the U.S

1. Deploy smart grid technologies

2. Measure and evaluate costs &

benefits

3. Communicate results and benefits to reduce

uncertainty

4. Address policy, technology & market

barriers to deployment

5. Catalyze more smart grid deployments and

investments

4

Page 5: Electricity Advisory Committee - Energy.gov · SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion Progress as

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

SGIG projects span the nation

5

99 Projects involving 228 Utilities and other Organizations

Page 6: Electricity Advisory Committee - Energy.gov · SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion Progress as

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion

Progress as of January 12, 2015

6

1 2 4 10

78

4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0% -10%

10% -20%

20% -30%

30% -40%

40% -50%

50% -60%

60% -70%

70% -80%

80% -90%

90% -100+%

Nu

mb

er o

f P

roje

cts

% of Total Expenditures to Date

SGIG Completion of Projects by Percentage of Total Expenditures to Date

POP Ended

POP Ongoing

96 of 99 projects are 70% or more

complete

4 of which have an expired period of performance

(POP) as of Jan. 12, 2015

Page 7: Electricity Advisory Committee - Energy.gov · SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion Progress as

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

SGIG Deployment Status - Sept 30, 2014

$4,318

$669

$2,050

$499

$4,506

$771

$2,086

$537 $0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

AMI Customer Systems Distribution Transmission

SGIG

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

($M

M)

Reported as of September 2014 Estimated at Completion

1,360 networked

PMUs, exceeding

800 expected at

completion

8,939 automated

switches, exceeding

7,500 expected at

completion, and

12,915 of 18,500

automated

capacitors expected

at completion

16.3 million smart

meters,

exceeding 15.5

million expected

at completion

677,000 direct load

control devices,

programmable

communicating

thermostats, and in-

home displays

Page 8: Electricity Advisory Committee - Energy.gov · SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion Progress as

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

SGIG Technology Performance

1. Reliability improvements

2. Reductions in peak and overall electricity demand

3. Reductions in operation costs

4. Improvements in asset management

5. Improvements in outage management and reliability

6. Improvements in system efficiency

7. Reductions in environmental emissions

Results - Examples 1. Reliability- up to 50% improvements in

distribution system reliability on select feeder groups

2. Peak Demand - reductions of more than 30% for customers participating in time-based rate programs

3. Operating Costs - reductions up to 50% in projects that have completed full deployment of AMI and smart meters

4. Asset Management - health monitoring systems provide “early warning” systems to identify impending failures for transformers and cut costs by 25%

5. Outage Management - reductions in the frequency and duration of power outages from distribution automation and AMI

6. Systems Efficiency - improvements in distribution system efficiency by approximately 3% for targeted feeder groups employing conservation voltage reduction techniques during summer reporting periods

7. Environmental – AMI and smart meters provide significant reductions in emissions due to reduced truck rolls

SGIG Goals

Page 9: Electricity Advisory Committee - Energy.gov · SGIG Progress - Jan 12, 2015 $7.536 billion spent of the $7.900 ( 94%) billion of total funding estimated at completion Progress as

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

For More Information

Website: www.smartgrid.gov

Reports: SGIG Progress Report (July 2012)

Peak Demand Reductions – Initial Results (December 2012) AMI O&M Savings – Initial Results (December 2012) Reliability Improvements – Initial Results (December 2012) Voltage Optimization – Initial Results (December 2012) Economic Impact (April 2013) Customer Enrollment Patterns in Time-Based Rate Programs (June 2013) Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Recovery Act Smart Grid

Programs (August 2013) Voices of Experience – Insights on Smart Grid Customer Engagement Plus, Case studies Reports by recipients (CBS evaluation studies, technology performance reports)

9

Contact: [email protected]