electrochemical sulfide removal and caustic recovery from spent …379150/uq379150... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Accepted Manuscript
Electrochemical sulfide removal and caustic recovery from spent caustic streams
Eleni Vaiopoulou, Thomas Provijn, Antonin Prévoteau, Ilje Pikaar, Korneel Rabaey
PII: S0043-1354(16)30038-0
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.039
Reference: WR 11793
To appear in: Water Research
Received Date: 6 October 2015
Revised Date: 30 December 2015
Accepted Date: 18 January 2016
Please cite this article as: Vaiopoulou, E., Provijn, T., Prévoteau, A., Pikaar, I., Rabaey, K.,Electrochemical sulfide removal and caustic recovery from spent caustic streams, Water Research(2016), doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.039.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service toour customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergocopyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Pleasenote that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and alllegal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
1
2
3
4
5
Electrochemical sulfide removal and caustic recovery from spent caustic 6
streams 7
Eleni Vaiopoulou1, Thomas Provijn1, Antonin Prévoteau1, Ilje Pikaar2, Korneel Rabaey1* 8
1Laboratory of Microbial Ecology & Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, University 9
of Ghent; Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 10
2School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia 11
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +32 9 264 5985; fax: +32 9 264 6248; 12
E-mail address: [email protected] 13
14
15
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2
ABSTRACT 16
Spent caustic streams (SCS) are produced during alkaline scrubbing of sulfide containing sour 17
gases. Conventional methods mainly involve considerable chemical dosing or energy 18
expenditures entailing high cost but limited benefits. Here we propose an electrochemical 19
treatment approach involving anodic sulfide oxidation preferentially to sulfur coupled to 20
cathodic caustic recovery using a two-compartment electrochemical system. Batch experiments 21
showed sulfide removal efficiencies of 84 ± 4% with concomitant 57 ± 4% efficient caustic 22
production in the catholyte at a final concentration of 6.4 ± 0.1 wt% NaOH (1.6 M) at an applied 23
current density of 100 A m-2. Subsequent long-term continuous experiments showed that stable 24
cell voltages (i.e. 2.7 ± 0.1 V) as well as constant sulfide removal efficiencies of 67 ± 5 % at a 25
loading rate of 47 g(S) L-1 h-1 were achieved over a period of 77 days. Caustic was produced at 26
industrially relevant strengths for scrubbing (i.e. 5.1 ± 0.9 wt% NaOH) at current efficiencies of 27
96 ± 2 %. Current density between 0-200 A m-2 and sulfide loading rates of 50-200 g(S) L-1 d-1 28
were tested. The higher the current density the more oxidized the sulfur species produced and the 29
higher the sulfide oxidation. On the contrary, high loading rate resulted in a reduction of sulfide 30
oxidation efficiency. The results obtained in this study together with engineering calculations 31
show that that the proposed process could represent a cost-effective approach for sodium and 32
sulfur recovery from SCS. 33
34
Keywords: electrochemical treatment; spent caustic; sulfide; sodium hydroxide; recovery 35
36
37
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
1. Introduction 38
Hydrogen sulfide is a toxic, malodorous and corrosive compound. The removal of sulfide 39
dissolved in wastewater and off-gases from chemical and petrochemical industrial activities 40
represents a considerable cost (Maugans et al., 2010; Paulino and Alfonso, 2012; Veerabhadraiah 41
et al., 2011). The resulting wastewater is known as spent caustic stream (SCS), named after the 42
wasted or used caustic soda. A typical SCS contains 5-12 wt% NaOH and 0.1-4 wt% S2- and can 43
be characterized as sulfidic, cresylic or naphthenic depending on their origin and composition 44
(Alnaizy, R., 2008; Veerabhadraiah et al., 2011). The high pH and sulfide toxicity of SCS limit 45
direct biological treatment, whereas neutralization and dilution may release H2S(g). SCS is a 46
strong reducing agent and has a high oxygen demand (2 mol O2 per mol HS-) (Henshaw and Zhu, 47
2001), resulting in dissolved oxygen depletion. 48
The most commonly used methods to treat SCS involve physico-chemical processes including 49
wet air oxidation and incineration (Alnaizy, R., 2008; Veerabhadraiah et al., 2011), oxidation 50
with oxidant agents addition, precipitation and neutralization/acidification (Tanaka and 51
Takenaka, 1995; Sheu and Weng, 2001), electrochemical (Hariz et al., 2013; Nuñez et al., 2009; 52
Paulino and Alfonso, 2012), biological (De Graaf et al., 2012) or bio-electrochemical processes 53
(Zhang et al., 2013). 54
Despite the variety of available methods to treat SCS, the key limitations that restrict their 55
application are cost, complexity, high consumption of chemicals, safety / handling issues 56
(Alnaizy, R., 2008; Veerabhadraiah et al., 2011) and most importantly the lack of recovered 57
product. Biological processes can alleviate some of these issues, as well as delivering 58
hydrophilic sulfur as recovery product, but require SCS pre-treatment, biomass acclimation and 59
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
sludge handling to overcome limitations imposed by high toxicity, pH and COD load. 60
Therefore, there is a general interest in more cost-effective, energy efficient and chemical free 61
methods such as (bio)electrochemical treatment. Several studies showed its feasibility via in situ 62
production of e.g iron (Hariz et al., 2013), hypochlorous acid (Martinie et al., 2006), oxygen or 63
other alike oxidizing agents, and possible coupling of sulfide removal to energy recovery (Kim 64
and Han, 2014; Wei et al., 2012, 2013; Zhang et al., 2013). While these above mentioned studies 65
revealed the potential and can be considered a step forward, they come with some disadvantages 66
including sacrificial anodes, high-energy input to generate oxidizing agents and short life 67
expectancy of materials. 68
Here we propose a novel method that could avoid these concerns. The method relies on the 69
simultaneous anodic oxidization of sulfide coupled to cathodic caustic generation in a two-70
compartment electrochemical cell. In the anode, sulfide is oxidized to elemental sulfur and other 71
sulfur oxyanions, while in the cathode water is reduced to hydroxide anions. In order to maintain 72
electroneutrality, sodium from the anode migrates through a cation exchange membrane (CEM) 73
that separates the two chambers and allows the selective migration of sodium from the anode to 74
the cathode chamber. Key advantages of this approach would be 1) elimination of chemical 75
dosing for sulfide oxidation and thus, less operational, transport, handling and storage cost of 76
potentially hazardous chemicals, which reduces occupational health and safety concerns, 2) 77
recovery of sodium and oxidized sulfur species that can be re-used in situ or be sold, 3) 78
straightforward process design, 4) potentially low energy demand that can be sourced from 79
renewable supply and 5) a neutralized stream with lower salinity and sulfide is generated towards 80
discharge. Therefore, the overall objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of this 81
approach and identify the key operational aspects. 82
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
2. Materials and Methods 83
2.1 Reactor setup and operation 84
2.1.1 Batch-fed reactor 85
The electrochemical cell consisted of two parallel Perspex frames with internal dimensions of 20 86
× 5 × 2 cm separated by a CEM (Fumasep FKB-PK-130, Fumatech GmbH, Germany) according 87
to (Pikaar et al., 2011). A reference electrode (Ag/AgCl (3M KCl), ALS, Japan, + 0.210 V vs. 88
SHE at 25 °C) was placed in the anode compartment. A flattened mesh shaped tantalum-iridium 89
mixed metal oxide (TaO2/IrO2 : 0.65/0.35) coated titanium electrode (Magneto Anodes BV, The 90
Netherlands) with a projected surface area of 100 cm2 was used as anode material. Stainless steel 91
fine mesh (projected surface area of 100 cm2) was used as cathode (mesh width 44 mµ, wire 92
thickness: 33 mµ, Solana, Belgium) and a stainless steel frame was serving as current collector. 93
A spacer (ElectroCell Europe A/S, Tarm, Denmark) was placed between the electrodes and the 94
CEM to prevent membrane contact with the electrodes. The batch electrochemical cell was 95
galvanostatically controlled using a power source (type PL-3003D, Protek) at a current density of 96
100 A m-2. 97
The anolyte consisted of 4 wt% NaOH and 1 wt% Na2S-S simulating a typical SCS. The 98
catholyte was 4 wt% NaOH at the onset of the experiment which ensured sufficient initial 99
conductivity and avoided putative non-electrically driven diffusion of sodium across the CEM. A 100
recirculation flow of 6 L h-1 was applied to obtain sufficient mixing by a peristaltic pump 101
(Watson-Marlow Inc., Massachusetts, US). Masterflex Norprene tubing with an internal diameter 102
of 6 mm was used for both anolyte and catholyte and recirculation lines. H2 produced in the 103
cathode was collected in the cathode effluent bottle. 104
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
Figure 1 105
2.1.2 Continuous reactor operation 106
The continuous-mode electrochemical cell (Fig. 1 red lines) was set up as a low-volume cell 107
(internal dimensions of the cell compartments were 7 × 2 × 1 cm with 5 × 2 cm effective 108
membrane area). SCS of the same composition as for batch mode was used as anolyte. The 109
catholyte was initially 4 wt% sodium hydroxide and then distilled water was fed continuously at 110
a flow rate of 82 ± 17 mL d-1 (HRT 4 h). Recirculation flow was set at 2 L h-1 to provide 111
sufficient mixing in both compartments. Peristaltic pumps (Watson-Marlow Inc., Massachusetts, 112
US) and flows were verified daily to assure accuracy and calculate standard deviations. 113
Three different sets of experiments were performed. In the first one, the reactor was run in a 114
continuous mode to determine a long-term operation performance at a fixed current density of 115
100 A m-2. The operation time was run in four periods: 1) day 0-25 and 35-49; the anolyte flow 116
rate was 128 ± 5 mL d-1 and sulfide loading rate (SLR) of 40 ± 3 g(S) L-1 d-1, 2) day 25-35; anode 117
flow rate was decreased to 73 ± 6 mL d-1 and SLR was 26 ± 2 g(S) L-1d-1, 3) day 49-104; batch 118
mode operation at 0.5 A m-2 (reactor remains assembled) and 4) day 104-132; anolyte flow rate 119
was increased to 134 ± 6 mL d-1 and SLR was 47 ± 2 g(S) L-1d-1. The catholyte flow rate was kept 120
constant at 82 ± 17 mL d-1. Along with flow rates, cell voltage, sulfur species, sodium and 121
hydroxide concentrations were monitored on a daily basis. The second experiments assessed the 122
impact of current density on reactor performance and sulfur speciation. Experiments were run at 123
50, 100, 150 and 200 A m-2 and the values presented herein are the ones recorded in triplicates 124
once a new steady state was reached (typically following the 5 times the hydraulic residence time 125
thumb rule and as long as concentrations remained constant). Anolyte and catholyte flow rates 126
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
were 121 ± 10 mL d-1 at SLR of 42 ± 4 g(S) L-1d-1 and 73 ± 3 mL d-1 respectively. The third 127
experiments aimed to investigate the impact of SLR - by applying different flow rates ranging 128
from 135 to 530 mL d-1. Experiments were run at 50, 100, 150 and 200 g(S) L-1d-1 at 100 A m-2 129
and the values presented herein are the ones recorded in triplicates once a new steady state was 130
reached. The ratio between the smallest SLR and smallest flow rate is slightly different than the 131
ratio of the highest SLR and highest flow rate due to slight differences in HS- concentration 132
when preparing feeding. An open circuit replicate was run to confirm that sulfide removal and 133
NaOH recovery are only driven by the applied current. To assess whether sulfur species were 134
crossing the membrane, catholyte samples were taken periodically. 135
2.3 Chemical analysis 136
Samples from the reactor were immediately preserved in previously prepared Sulfide 137
Antioxidant Buffer solution prior to analysis as suggested by Keller-Lehmann et al. (2006). 138
Sulfide, sulfite (SO32-) and thiosulfate (S2O3
2-) concentrations were measured by ion 139
chromatography (IC), using an IC930 compact Metrohm IC system (Metrohm, Switzerland), 140
according to Keller-Lehmann et al. (2006). The eluent consists of 3.5 mM Na2CO3 and 3mM 141
NaHCO3 at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min-1. A 0.1 M NaOH solution is used to produce a pH 142
gradient needed for thiosulfate detection in the IC system. Sulfate (SO42-) was determined on an 143
IC761 compact Metrohm IC system (Metrohm, Switzerland) equipped with a Metrosep A Supp 144
5-150 anion exchange column and a conductivity detector, according to Standard Methods 145
(APHA, 1992). The eluent, consisting of 3.2 mM Na2CO3 and 1 mM NaHCO3, had a flow rate of 146
0.7 mL min-1. To measure the polysulfide and elemental sulfur concentrations, all sulfur species 147
were oxidized to sulfate with excess H2O2 as described elsewhere (Dutta et al., 2010). The 148
difference in sulfur equivalent between the sulfate after H2O2 oxidation and other species 149
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
measured before H2O2 oxidation (i.e. sulfide, sulfate, thiosulfate and sulfite) was regarded as the 150
sum of polysulfides and elemental sulfur. 151
Alkalinity, as indicator of NaOH concentration, is measured by titrating the cathode effluent with 152
a 1 M HCl solution. Sodium was determined following procedures outlined in Standard Methods 153
(APHA, 1992), using an IC761 compact Metrohm IC system (Metrohm, Switzerland) equipped 154
with Metrosep C6-250/4.0 cation-exchange column and a conductivity meter. The eluent, 155
consisting of 1.7 mM HNO3 and 1.7 mM dipicolinic acid, ran at a flow rate of 0.9 mL min-1. 156
All samples were run in triplicates. Experimental values are provided as the mean +/- standard 157
deviation. 158
2.4 Electrochemical measurements and calculations 159
During the continuous mode operation, cell voltage was monitored every 3 min with a VSP 160
multichannel potentiostat (Princeton Applied Research, France). The electrical resistance of the 161
cells was monitored by the current interrupt technique as described in the Supplementary 162
Material. Current densities are reported with respect to the projected surface area of the anode. 163
Depending on sulfide oxidation product, the oxidation process can involve different amount of 164
electrons per sulfide consumed. Anodic reactions of sulfide oxidation are described elsewhere 165
(Dutta et al., 2010). The coulombic efficiency (CE) for sulfide conversion was calculated 166
assuming only the 2-electron conversion of sulfide to elemental sulfur as described elsewhere 167
(Dutta et al., 2010). CE for sodium recovery is only restricted by membrane transport and was 168
calculated as the ratio of sodium theoretically transferred due to current applied to hydroxyl 169
anions produced (based on the assumption sodium cations and hydroxyl anions are equal, since 170
no other cations are in solution). 171
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9
3. Results and Discussion 172
3.1 Batch mode reactor 173
At a fixed current density of 100 A m-2, 84 ± 4% of the sulfide was converted (Fig.2) at a 174
coulombic efficiency (CE) of 75 ± 4%. A NaOH solution was recovered at an efficiency over the 175
batch of 57 ± 4% at a CE of 91 ± 5%. The final concentration was 6.4 ± 0.1 wt% NaOH (1.6 M) 176
after 8 h experiments. The pH of the anolyte was initially 13.7 but decreased to 13.2 ± 0.1 at the 177
end of the experiment due to proton production from water splitting in the anode compartment 178
(Fig.2). The remaining high pH cannot be directly discharged, but ensures that residual sulfide 179
remains into solution rather than stripping off (pKa (H2S/HS-) = 6.9). In terms of energy input, 180
cell voltage evolution shows a moderate increase over time from 1.79 to 2.47 V (Fig. S1). This 181
increase is mainly because of sulfide depletion in the anolyte (low conductivity measured); 182
eventually leading to more energy demanding O2 evolution once HS- mass transfer cannot 183
sustain the current applied. This assumption is further based on the low internal resistance of the 184
cell, which was 0.10 ± 0.03 Ω (SI). At this current (1 A), this implies an ohmic drop of 0.10 ± 185
0.03 V accounting for about 4% of the operating voltage. The relatively low ohmic drop is 186
attributed to the high conductivity of both electrolytes. 187
Figure 2 188
The effluent NaOH concentration of 1.6 M (at a fixed current density of 100 A m-2) is considered 189
high, when compared with an electrodialysis SCS treatment that recovered up to 0.15 M NaOH 190
at higher current densities (800 A m-2) (Wei et al., 2012). In the same study, experiments at fixed 191
current density of 300 A m2 resulted in 0.05 M NaOH in 2 h batch experiments at CE of 100%. 192
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10
The higher CE in this case can be explained by the smaller electrode (7 cm2) and bigger 193
catholyte volume leading to lower cathode concentrations ( > 500 cm2). 194
3.2 Continuous mode reactor 195
The electrochemical cell was operated in a continuous mode for 77 d exhibiting stable 196
performance and reproducibility as confirmed by stable cell voltage, sulfide removal efficiency 197
and restored values when disturbed (Fig.3). Cell voltage was constant at 2.74 ± 0.10 V for a 198
sulfide loading rate (SLR) of 47 ± 2.2 g(S) L-1 h-1 and flow rate of 0.13 L d-1 in the anodic 199
chamber. A SLR decrease from 40 ± 3.2 (day 0-25) to 26 ± 2.2 g(S) L-1 h-1 (day 25-34) resulted in 200
higher cell voltage of 3.08 ± 0.26 V. The cell voltage was restored after the SLR increased again 201
to 47 g(S) L-1 h-1 (day 35 - 45) (Fig.3). The same reproducible behavior was recorded after the 202
batch mode operation period (day 49 - 104) and unexpected single day lab implications (day 47 203
and day 124). Sulfide conversion efficiency for the overall 77 d of continuous operation was 67 204
± 5 % at a CE of 54 ± 7 % for both SLR of 47 and 26 g(S) L-1 h-1. For the different SLR applied, 205
sulfide conversion efficiency was 68 ± 5 % at a CE of 69 ± 3 % for a SLR of 47 g(S) L-1 h-1. 206
When the SLR was decreased to 26 g(S) L-1 h-1, these efficiencies were 71 ± 8% and 45 ± 6% 207
respectively, 208
Figure 3 209
Influent sulfide of 10.8 ± 0.3 g(S) L-1 was oxidized for 30% to thiosulfate (3.2 ± 0.3 g(S) L
-1), then 210
to sulfate (1.4 ± 0.1 g(S) L-1) for 13 %, to polysulfide and elemental sulfur (≈ 0.6 ± 0.7 g(S) L
-1) for 211
5.5 %, while 3.7 ± 0.1 g(S) L-1 of sulfide remained unconverted. These values come from analysis 212
data and do not include the elemental sulfur that has been deposited on the electrode or other 213
parts of the reactor. 214
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
Clean NaOH solution was recovered in the catholyte via hydroxide electrogeneration and Na+ 215
migration across the CEM. As Na+ was the only cation present, alkalinity analysis results can be 216
linked to NaOH concentrations. NaOH was produced at high CE (96 ± 2%) with a catholyte 217
effluent concentration of 1.3 ± 0.1 M (5.1 ± 0.4 wt%). 218
The iridium-tantalum oxide coated titanium anode showed stable performance through the whole 219
experimental period of about 5 months, despite the harsh conditions of high sulfide 220
concentrations and high pH. A study applying higher current densities than our range of 0-200 A 221
m-2 reported corrosion and limited lifetime of a mixed iridium-tantalum oxide coated titanium 222
electrode used as anode (Behm & Simonsson, 1997b). Corrosion in this case was attributed to 223
the hydrodynamics, as it occurred mainly on points of turbulence, and at high applied potentials. 224
Electrochemical sulfide oxidation at carbon electrodes can result in an elemental sulfur layer on 225
the anode, causing electrode passivation (Dutta et al., 2008). Here the anode remained fully 226
functional through the whole experimental period due to the different electrode material used 227
(higher oxidizing power) and higher pH (neutral vs highly alkaline). In our study, possible 228
mechanisms of continuous reactivation of the anode could be a de-flaking process by 229
concomitant oxygen generation on the anode surface, sulfur dissolution by polysulfide anions in 230
alkaline condition or further oxidation of sulfur in contact with the electrode to dissolved 231
thiosulfate or sulfate. A joint mechanism could be possible if the inner layer of the elemental 232
sulfur is oxidized to sulfur oxyanions while the remaining sulfur in the outer layer reacts with 233
sulfides to form polysulphide (Behm & Simonsson, 1997a). This appears the most plausible 234
mechanism as there was no observation of flakes or sulfur particles in the reactor or the effluent. 235
3.3.Impact of current density and sulfide loading rate on sulfide oxidation products 236
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12
Current density affects anode potential and thus, further affects anode sulfide oxidation and the 237
formation of more oxidized sulfur species. The higher the current density, the higher the 238
proportion of sulfur oxyanions such as thiosulfate and sulfate became (Fig.4A). Controls in 239
absence of current (OCV) showed no sulfide oxidation. At 50 A m-2 no sulfate but elemental 240
sulfur and polysulfide were produced, at 100 and 150 A m-2 sulfide oxidation was gradually 241
enhanced and concentrations of thiosulfate and sulfate increased, whereas at 200 A m-2 no steady 242
state was achieved due to constantly increasing cell voltage (Fig.S2). Cell voltage attained the 243
same values on the current density steps backwards (Fig.S2). The same trends were also 244
confirmed for sulfur species production when repeating the experiments applying the reverse 245
scheme of current densities, i.e. from 200 to 0 by steps of 50 A m-2 (Fig.4A, S2). The production 246
of more oxidized sulfur species in higher current density is in agreement with the previously 247
described sulfide oxidation mechanism. The same behaviour in high alkaline conditions has been 248
observed elsewhere (Behm & Simonsson, 1997a; Kim and Han, 2014). 249
Figure 4 250
Sulfide removal efficiency reached a maximum of 86 ± 3 % at 150 A m-2. The lowest recorded 251
sulfide removal was 73 ± 1 % at 50 A m-2. The CE of sulfide oxidation decreased with increasing 252
current density, as expected. A CE higher than 100 % for sulfide oxidation at 50 A m-2 is likely 253
related to polysulfide formation occurring at high pH at the electrode interface (Fig.4A) via the 254
chemical reaction between previously formed S0 and dissolved sulfide (Behm & Simonsson, 255
1997a). This reaction is thermodynamically and kinetically favored at high pH (Steudel and 256
Eckert, 2003), which in our study is above 13. High sulfide loading rates (SLR) due to high 257
influent flow rates resulted in lower overall sulfide removal and less oxidized sulfur species, 258
which further induced elemental sulfur and polysulfide formation at high pH (Fig.4B). Higher 259
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
SLR implied lower steady state voltage values and higher CE (Fig.S3). This is an apparent effect 260
as it is mostly linked to the lower anode potential and low mass transfer limiting current for 261
sulfide oxidation. Although it was not possible to differentiate analytically between elemental 262
sulfur and polysulfide, at lower current densities the anode effluent had a characteristic intense 263
yellow color that is indicative of polysulfide (Steudel and Eckert, 2003). Results regarding sulfur 264
speciation, as far as polysulfide and elemental sulfur are concerned, were mostly qualitative 265
based on the color and texture of the anode effluent. 266
The NaOH production rate increased linearly with the current density increase at high CE (98 ± 3 267
%). Effluent concentration of NaOH increased from 2.7 ± 0.1 to 9.8 ± 1.4 wt% at current 268
densities from 50 to 200 A m-2. Theoretically expected NaOH concentration values were 269
calculated according to the current applied to drive the crossing of Na+ from anode to cathode 270
compartment and catholyte flow rate, which was recorded daily (73 ± 3 mL d-1). Production 271
efficiency of NaOH was 76 ± 2 % for current densities of 50 to 150 A m-2, based on the ratio of 272
expected concentrations to actual sodium measurements. These findings imply, as expected, that 273
the current density has within the range tested had no significant effect on CE, whereas caustic 274
strength can have a greater impact as at higher NaOH concentrations, sodium and hydroxyl ion 275
back diffusion might happen. Since the SLR experiments are based on flow rate changes in the 276
anolyte, they have also no impact on the NaOH recovery. Effluent concentration of NaOH ranges 277
from 5.2 ± 0.2 to 6.4 ± 0.8 wt% when SLR ranged from 50 to 150 g(S) L-1 h-1 and current density 278
remained fixed at 100 A m-2. The fluctuations are explained by influent catholyte flow rate 279
fluctuations ranging between 54 and 81 mL d-1. The measured values correspond well with the 280
theoretically predicted values and they are well reproducible on the backwards step from 200 to 281
50 g(S) L-1 h-1. CE is recorded close to 100 ±7 % for all experiments. 282
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
14
3.5 Implications for practice 283
Electrochemical SCS treatment was technologically feasible and resulted in recovery of sodium 284
as a clean sodium hydroxide solution and different sulfide oxidation products, such as elemental 285
sulfur, polysulfide, thiosulfate and sulfate. To implement such process into practice, there are a 286
number of considerations to be addressed as a first step. These include design issues, economic 287
viability, and optimization in terms of anode potential, higher caustic strengths, different 288
membranes to increase stability of the membrane and electrode over longer period of time etc. 289
Further, the presence of other compounds such as organic pollutants need to be considered. 290
Economics of the process would rely on the cost of investment, including materials and 291
engineering cost, the operational cost and possible savings from recovery of chemicals and 292
omission of other costly methods to remove sulfide. An estimation of this cost has been 293
calculated as an indication only (Table S1). Further process optimization and testing with real 294
wastewater is required before up-scaling this technology and calculating in more detail the 295
process cost. Another preliminary techno-economical approach estimated electrochemical NaOH 296
recovery cost from SCS at less than 1 USD per kg NaOH (Wei et al., 2012). 297
4. Conclusions 298
• Electrochemical spent caustic steams treatment has been shown herein to potentially be 299
an economically feasible and environmental friendly process that can recover valuable 300
products from waste. 301
• Sulfide conversion can be driven towards elemental sulfur, polysulfide, thiosulfate and 302
sulfate depending on the current density and sulfide loading rate. 303
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15
• Besides sulfur species, sodium can be recovered at high coulombic efficiencies and 304
alleviate investment and operational costs. 305
• Electrochemical sulfide oxidation and sodium recovery processes were robust and reactor 306
materials remained unaffected during operation. 307
• Before this concept can be applied for more industrial applications and thus, promote 308
implementation of sustainable technology and resource recovery, rigorous economic 309
assessment, process optimization and testing in field conditions are required. 310
311
312
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16
References 313
Alnaizy, R., 2008. Economic Analysis for Wet Oxidation Processes for the Treatment of Mixed 314
Refinery Spent Caustic. Environmental Progress 27 (3), 295–301. 315
American Public Health Association (APHA), Greenberg, A.E., Clesceri, L.S. and Eaton, A.D 316
1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed. Washington, 317
DC, USA. 318
Behm, M. & Simonsson, D. 1997a. Electrochemical production of polysulfides and sodium 319
hydroxide from white liquor Part I: Experiments with rotating disc and ring-disc electrodes 320
Journal of applied electrochemistry 27, 507-518. 321
Behm, M. & Simonsson, D. 1997b. Electrochemical production of polysulfides and sodium 322
hydroxide from white liquor Part II: Electrolysis in a laboratory scale flow cell. Journal of 323
applied electrochemistry 27, 519-528. 324
Buisman, C.J.N, Vellinga, S.H.J., Janssen, G.H.R. and Dijkman, H. 1999. Biological sulfide 325
production for metal recovery. In TMS Congress 1999, Fundamentals of lead and zinc extraction 326
for metal recovery 1–7. 327
Hariz, I. Ben, Halleb, A., Adhoum, N., Monser, L. 2013. Treatment of petroleum refinery 328
sulfidic spent caustic wastes by electrocoagulation. Separation and Purification Technology 107, 329
150–157. 330
Dutta, P.K., Rabaey, K., Yuan, Z., Keller, J. 2008. Spontaneous electrochemical removal of 331
aqueous sulfide. Water Research 42, 4965 – 4975. 332
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17
Dutta, P.K., Rabaey, K., Yuan, Z., Rozendal, R.A., Keller, J. 2010. Electrochemical sulfide 333
removal and recovery from paper mill anaerobic treatment effluent Water Research 44, 2563 – 334
2571. 335
Henshaw, P. F., Zhu, W. 2001. Biological conversion of hydrogen sulphide to elemental sulphur 336
in a fixed-film continuous flow photo-reactor Water Research 35 (15), 3605-3610. 337
Keller-Lehmann, B., Corrie, S., Ravn, R., Yuan, Z., Keller, J., 2006. Preservation and 338
simultaneous analysis of relevant soluble sulfur species in sewage samples. In: 2nd International 339
IWA Conference on Sewer Operation and Maintenance, Vienna, Austria. 340
Kim, K. and Han, J.-I., 2014. Performance of direct alkaline sulfide fuel cell without sulfur 341
deposition on anode International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39, 7142 – 7146. 342
Paulino, J.F. and Alfonso, J. 2012. New Strategies For Treatment and Reuse of Spent Sulfidic 343
Caustic Streams from Petroleum Industry Quim. Nova 35 (7), 1447–1452 344
Pikaar, I., Rozendal, R.A., Yuan, Z., Keller, J., Rabaey, K. 2011. Electrochemical sulfide 345
removal from synthetic and real domestic wastewater at high current densities. Water Research 346
45, 2281 – 2289. 347
Martinie, G.D., Shabrani, F.M.A., Dabrousi, B.O. 2006. Process for treating a Sulfur-containing 348
spent caustic refinery stream using a membrane electrolyzer powered by a fuel cell. Pub. No.: US 349
2006/0254930 A. 350
Maugans, C., Howdeshell, M., De Haan, S. Apr 2010. Update: Spent caustic treatment. 351
Hydrocarbon Processing, 89 (4), 61. 352
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18
Nuñez P., Hansen, H.K., Rodriguez, N., Guzman, J., Gutierrez C. 2009. Electrochemical 353
Generation of Fenton's Reagent to Treat Spent Caustic Wastewater. Separation Science and 354
Technology 44, 2223-2233. 355
Sheu, S.H. and Weng H.S. 2001. Treatment of olefin plant spent caustic by combination of 356
neutralization and Fenton reaction. Water Research 35 (8), 2017–2021. 357
Steudel, R. and Eckert, B. 2003. Solid Sulfur Allotropes. Topics in Current Chemistry, 230, 1–358
79. 359
Tanaka, N. and Takenaka, K., 1995. Control of hydrogen sulfide and degradation of organic 360
matter by air injection into a wastewater force main. Water Science and Technology 31 (7), 273-361
282. 362
Veerabhadraiah, G., Mallika, N., Jindal, S. 2011. Spent caustic management: Remediation 363
review. Hydrocarbon Processing 364
(http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/Article/2925664/Spent-caustic-management-365
Remediation-review.html). 366
Wei, Y. Li, C., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Li, Q., Xu, T. 2012. Regenerating sodium hydroxide from 367
the spent caustic by bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BMED) Separation and Purification 368
Technology 86, 49–54. 369
Wei, Y. Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Xu., T. 2013. Comparative study on regenerating sodium 370
hydroxide from the spent caustic by bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BMED) and electro-371
electrodialysis (EED) Separation and Purification Technology 118, 1–5. 372
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19
Zhang, J. Zhang, B., Tian, C., Ye, Z., Liu, Y., Lei, Z., Huang, W., Feng, C. 2013. Simultaneous 373
sulfide removal and electricity generation with corn stover biomass as co-substrate in microbial 374
fuel cells. Bioresource technology 138, 198–203 375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20
List of figure legends 391
Fig.1 Schematic diagram of the electrochemical cell. The cell was run in batch (proof-of-concept 392
experiments) and continuous (long term experiments) mode. Anode influent consisted of 4 wt% 393
NaOH and 1 wt% Na2S-S, and cathode influent was 4 wt% NaOH for the batch experiments and 394
distilled water for the continuous experiments. 395
Fig. 2 Sulfide removal in the anode at high pH in 8h batch experiments and CE of 75± 4%. 396
Fig. 3 Cell voltage evolution during the long term experiment. Without considering the 397
interruption period (day 49 - 104), the decrease in loading rate (day 25 - 34), and other single day 398
lab implications (day 47 and day 124), a stable cell voltage of 2.74 ± 0.10 V was maintained for 399
77 days of operation at 100 A m-2. 400
Fig. 4 (A) Impact of current density on sulfur speciation in the anolyte effluent. Influent SLR: 42 401
± 4 g(S) L-1d-1, flow rate: 121 ± 10 mL d-1. Higher current densities result in more oxidized 402
species and higher sulfide oxidation. (B) Effect of different sulfide loading rates 50 - 200 g(S) L-1 403
h-1 by a step of 50 g(S) L-1 h-1 on sulfur speciation at 100 A m-2. Higher loading rates result in less 404
sulfide removal, less oxidized sulfur species and induce polysulfide formation. 405
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MANUSCRIP
T
ACCEPTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
• Electrochemical spent caustic treatment allows economical product recovery
• Current density and sulfide loading rate determine sulfide oxidation products
• Sodium is recovered at high coulombic efficiencies and alleviates costs
• Reactor materials remained unaffected during long term electrochemical operation