electrochemistry lecture 2 voltammetrysites.usm.edu/electrochem/che 729 current topics in... · •...
TRANSCRIPT
1
ElectrochemistryLecture 2
Voltammetry
CHE 729
Dr. Wujian Miao
Reference Books
Electrochemical Cell Working electrode:
place where redox occurs, surface area few mm2 to limit current flow.
Reference electrode:constant potential reference
Counter (Auxiliary) electrode: inert material, plays no part in redox but completes circuit
•Supporting electrolyte:alkali metal salt does not react with electrodes but has conductivity
1
2
3
2
Electrochemical Instrumentation
Voltammetry Electrochemistry techniques based on
current (i) measurement as function of voltage (Eappl)
Voltammetry — Usually when the working electrode is solid, e.g., Pt, Au, GC.
Polarograph — A special term used for the voltammetry carried out with a (liquid) MURCURY electrode.
Voltammogram — The plot of the electrode current as a function of potential.
Linear sweep voltammetryThe potential is varied linearly with time with
sweep rates v ranging from 10 mV/s to about1000 V/s with conventional electrodes and up to106 V/s with ultramicroelectrodes (UMEs).
It is customary to record the current as afunction of potential, which is equivalent torecording current versus time.
Linear sweep voltammetry, linear scanvoltammetry (LSV), or linear potential sweepchronoamperometry.
4
5
6
3
X = 0
(Ox + ne Red) (reversible)
x = ∞ (“bulk”)
x = 0
Linear Sweep/Scan VoltammetryPeak-shaped i~E profile
For A + e = A- reversible reaction, E0(A/A-) = E0
(1) E >> E0, i ~ 0
(2) E = E0 + dE, i >> 0, increases
(3) E = E0, i >> 0, [A] = [A-] =[A*]/2
(4) E = E0 - 28.5 mV, i maximum, [A]x =0 ~ 0.25[A*]
(5) E << E0, i >> 0, decreases, as the depletion effect
DigiSim demonstration
0
00
A A
[A]ln
[A ]
where , [A] = [A ]x
e
RTE E
nF
E E
7
8
9
4
Cyclic Voltammetry (CV)
DigiSim demonstration
Potential: E(t) = Ei - t (V), 0 < t
E(t) = Ei - 2 + t (V), t >
CV is not an ideal method for quantitative evaluation ofsystem properties. It is powerful in qualitative and semi-quantitative reaction behavior.
Cyclic Voltammetry- i vs time
DigiSim demonstration
NERNSTIAN (REVERSIBLE) SYSTEMS
Semi-infinite linear diffusion, only O exist initially
LSV: potential changes linearly at a sweep rate of v (\//s)
0'
0'
0'
(0, )( ) ln
(0, )
(0, )exp ( ) ( )
(0, )
( ) , =( / ) ; exp ( / )( )
O
R
Oi
R
ti
C tnFE t E
RT C t
C t nFE t E S t
C t RT
S t e nF RT v nF RT E E
Nernst equation
10
11
12
5
Mass Transfer/Transport
-
rx
2
n mt
rxn
mt
m
-1
d
For a process:
/ flux ( )
: net rate of electrode reaction
: rate of mass transfer
: current; : area
unit : m
of electrod
ole cm
e
s
total c
Nernst
v v i nFA J
v
v
i A
i i i i
J
If use short times ( < 10 s) and don’t stir (quiescent),
then itotal = id + im
Nernst-Planck Equation(governing the mass transport to an electrode)
xx
x
RT
F
x
xx CCDzCDJ iii
iiii
Diffusion Migration Convection
Ji(x) = flux of species i at distance x from electrode (mole cm-2 s-1)Di = diffusion coefficient (cm2/s)Ci(x)/x = concentration gradient at distance x from electrode(x)/x = potential gradient at distance x from electrode(x) = velocity at which species i moves (cm/s)
“-”: flux direction opposites the concentration gradient change
13
14
15
6
If We Use High Concentration of Good Electrolyte in Quiescent Solution...
Nernst-Planck Equation reduces to...
Fick’s First Law
• Flux of substance is proportional to its concentration gradient:
i.e., flux concentration gradient
0
,, o
o
x t ix t
x nFACJ D
LSV Reversible System
( ( / ) )nF RT
( ) is a pure number at any given point
and can be solved .numerica
where t
lly
After the Laplace transformation and a series of mathematical treatments of the diffusion equations:
𝜒 [“kai”]
Excel Calculation of t
0.446295
My Excelcalculation
16
17
18
7
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
-200-1000100200
t
)
n(E-E1/2) (mV)
Reversible system0
max{ ( )} 0.4463 when ( - ) 28.5t n E E mV
Peak current and potential
31/2 3/2 * 1/2 1/2
p
5 3/2 * 1/2 1/2
0.4463( )
= (2.69 10 ) at 25 C.
O O
O O
Fi n AC D
RT
n AC D
p 1/2 28.5 / (mV) 25E E n at C
Peak current ip
Peak potential Ep
0' 1/ 21/ 2 ( / ) ln( / )R OE E RT nF D D
Ep is independent of scan rate.
Units: Amperes, cm^2, cm^2/s, mol/cm^3, V/s
1/2pi v
19
20
21
8
E0’
Cur
rent
i (A
)
E (mV, vs. ref electrode)
p 1/2
p/2 1/2 1/2
0' 1/2 0'R1/2
o
1.109 / 28.5/ mV @ 25 C
1.109 / 28.5/ mV @ 25 C
ln( )
E E RT nF n
E E RT nF E n
DRTE E E
nF D
p p/2
1/2p p
| | 2.22 / 57.0/ mV@ 25 C
( ) ( )
E E RT nF n
E f v i f v
o Rne
Cyclic Voltammetry
Cyclic Voltammograms for a Reversible Reaction
pc pa
pa pc
o
0'pa pc
3/2 1/2 * 1/2p
o 5
/ 1.0
( ) 2(1.109 )
57 mV/n at 25 C
(independent of the scan rate)
= ( ) / 2
= constant
(at 25 C, constant = 2.69 10 )
o o
i i
RTE E
nF
E E E
i n AD c v
22
23
24
9
Diffusion Controlled Reversible Process
p
For electrode adsorption process
i v
Peak separation potentials, although close to 57 mV, are slightly a function of switching potentials.
Reversibility of Electrochemical System Can be Changed via the Change of Scan Rate
At small v (or long times),systems may yield reversiblewaves, while at large v (orshort times), irreversiblebehavior is observed.
/ lamda
f = nF/RT
25
26
27
10
0
0
Electron Transfer Rate
, ,p p
k
k E i
Totally Irreversible System
(NO Reversal Peak)
CV Applications in Diagnosing Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
EC Reaction (Electron Transfer followed by A Chemical Reaction
28
29
30
11
EC Reaction: Scan Rate Dependent
(a) At Fast Scan Rate (b) At Slow scan Rate
ECE Process
(a) S is more difficult to reduce than O (i.e., E0’S < E0’O)
(b) S is easier to reduce than O (i.e., E0’S > E0’O)
OR ST
TS
OR
(ST)
TS
(2nd ST)
Multi-step Systems
O + n1e R1 (E10)
R1 + n2e R2 (E20)
E0 = E20 - E1
0
E0: (a) -180 mV; (b) -90 mV; (c) 0 mV; (d) 180 mV.
0 (2 / ) ln 2 36E RT F mV
The CV looks the same as one electron-transfer process.
31
32
33
12
Ohmic Potential, IR Drop
• Potential change (drop) due to electrochemical solution resistance
• Eir = IRI—current of the electrochemical cell,R—resistance of the electrolyte solution.
• Ecell = Ecathode-Eanode- IR
• Question: In electrochemical study, an inert electrolyte is always added to the analyte solution. Why?
A A + e = B
R = 0R = 10 Ohm
Ep = 58 mVEp = 100 mV
cA =1 mM50 mV/sArea = 1 cm2
Faradaic and Nonfaradaic Processes
Faradaic• Charges or electrons are transferred
across the electrode|electrolyte interface as a result of electrochemical reactions
• Governed by Faraday’s law
A
A
A
where = # of e transfered
= Faraday constant (96, 485 C/mol)
= # of moles of electroactive species
Q nFN n
F
N
dNdQi nF
dt dt
34
35
36
13
Nonfaradaic Process• Charges associated with movement of
electrolyte ions, reorientation of solvent dipoles, adsorption/desorption of species, etc. at the electrode|electrolyteinterface.
• Changes with changing potential and solution composition
• Charges do not cross the interface but external currents can still flow
• Regarded as “background current”
Nonfaradaic Processes and the nature of electrode|electrolyte interface; the Double layer
• Electrons transferred at electrode surface by redox reactions occur at liquid/solid interface (heterogeneous)
• (1) A compact inner layer (d0 d1)• (2) a diffuse layer (d1 –d2)
com
pact
inne
r la
yer
diff
use
laye
r
Charging current ic
10-40 F/cm2
Potential dependent
37
38
39
14
Equivalent Circuits of Electrochemical Cell
CSCE >> Cd
RC Circuit-Voltage Ramp (Potential Sweep)
S d
s d
d s d
( / ) /
if 0 at 0
[1 exp( / )]
R CE vt E E
vt R dq dt q C
q t
i vC t R C
ic = f(v)
General Equivalent Circuit
c f
f
c
Overall current
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) =
SNR , limit of detection (LOD)
I i i
ii
40
41
42
15
Cyclic Voltammetry
v = dE/t
c d s d
c c
[1 exp( / )]
( ; , )
v
v
i C t R C
i t i
f
f
pc 5 3/2 1/2 1/2Ox
1/2
Ox
pc
2.69 10
( )
i n AD C
i
v
v
f1/2
c
-5 -6
1SNR
small at fast and low
LOD of CV ~ 10 -10 M
ii v
v C
Itotal
How do we eliminate the charging current so that
electrochemical techniques could be used in quantifying low
concentrations of redox species?
(Pulse Voltammetry)
RC Circuit-Potential Step
RsCd time constantin s
I = 5% (E/Rs) at t = 3
43
44
45
16
A is reduced to A- at potential E2
(A)
(A-)
This kind of experiment is called chronoamperometry, because current
is recorded as a function of time.
0 0
* * *
* 1/ 2 *
1/ 2 1/ 2
Cottrell Equation
( ) ( ) , δδ
0 0 ( ) ( )
δ
o oo x o x
o o o oo o
o o o o
c ciD D Dt
nFA x
c c D cD
D c nFAD ci nFA
tD
DDt
t
Curves 1, 2, 3, Co(0, t) not 0-not diffusion controlled(electrode reaction-controlled)
46
47
48
17
Sampled Current Voltammetry(Normal Pulse Voltammetry)
Eliminating ic: Potential Step/Pulse Voltammetry
(LOD~10-8 M)
if
Po
ten
tial E
Time
E
t
sample point
ic
c s d cs
*1/2Ox Ox
f f
c
When applying :
exp( / )
( )
at , 0, so SNR
t
E
Ei t R C i e
R
nFAD Ci t i t
t
i
Staircase Voltammetry
Normal Pulse VoltammetryDifferential Pulse Voltammetry
Additive Cyclic Square Wave Voltammetry (ACSWV)
faci
fcci
fac c
fcc c
rac c
rcc c
: forward
: forward
: reverse
: reverse
i anodic i
i cathodic i
i anodic i
i cathodic i
Fci
Rci
fa fcc c
r
Fc
Rc
F Rc
a rcc c
c
c c
additive
0
i i
i i
To
i
i
i i
tal I
I
j j'
2H+1
4H+1
49
50
51
18
Pulse Voltammetric Techniques
• All pulse techniques are based on the difference in the rate of the decay of the charging and the faradaic currents following a potential step (or "pulse").
• The rate of decay: ich much faster than if.-- ich is negligible at a time of 5RsCd (time constant, ~µs to ms) after the potential step.
• The sampled i consists solely of the faradaic current.
*
ch fexp( ); ( .)o
s s d
nFA DCE ti i Cottrell Eq
R R C t
Important parameters
Pulse amplitude: the height of the potential pulse. This may or may not be constant depending upon the technique.
Pulse width: the duration of the potential pulse.
Sample period: the time at the end of the pulse during which the current is measured.
52
53
54
19
Staircase Polarography/Voltammetry
Digital potentiostats use a staircase wave form as an approximation to a linear wave form. This approximation is only valid when E is small (< =0.26 mV) and analog current integration filtering is used.
Normal Pulse Polarography/Voltammetry
55
56
57
20
Differential Pulse Voltammetry (DPV)
58
59
60
21
Square Wave Voltammetry (SWV)
Peak Current:
=1 for large pulse amplitudes
Charging current (smaller more than an order of magnitude than that of NPV) with LOD 10 nM.
C60 reductions
61
62
63
22
Square Wave Voltammetry (SWV)
64
65
66
23
SWV Response
67
68
69
24
Comparison between SWV and CV
• Low electrochemical background.
• Much low detection limit.
• Much less distortion of voltammogram-easy to fit theoretical data.
• Better for evaluating quantitative parameters.
• More intuitively in chemical terms for most practitioners.
• Reversal of CV covers a large span of E—more readily highlights linkages b/w processes occurring at widely separated potentials.
• Wider range of time scales.
SWV Strengths CV Strengths
Applications of Voltammetry
• Dopamine detection in mice brains
• ……
• Au or Si NPs redox behavior
• ……
Anodic Striping Voltammetry (ASV)
Principle of anodic stripping. (a) Preelectrolysis at Ed; stirred solution, (b) Rest period; stirrer off. (c) Anodic scan.
70
71
72
25
ASV-Electrode Dependence
HMDE
Pyrolytic graphite
Unpolished GC
Polished GC
Sensitivity and Limit Detection
73
74