electromagnetism - question regarding inverse relation of resistance with area of cross section -...

2
4/4/2015 electromagnetism Question regarding inverse relation of resistance with area of cross section Physics Stack Exchange http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/67608/questionregardinginverserelationofresistancewithareaofcrosssection 1/2 sign up log in tour help Take the 2minute tour × Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required. Question regarding inverse relation of resistance with area of cross section It is said that resistance is inversely proportional to area of cross section. But greater area will have greater electric flux, and greater electric flux will have greater magnetic flux, and greater the magnetic flux will have greater eddy current, which is opposite to the current flowing. So this will oppose the current hence resistance increases. Am I right? electromagnetism electrostatics resistance edited Jun 10 '13 at 18:51 Qmechanic 44.1k 6 61 138 asked Jun 10 '13 at 17:22 kuldeep singh 11 1 3 Answers Even if the claim were correct, you would not be ; you would be while the statement you are making would be . ;) true right true But the explanation you are offering isn't right. The reason why the resistance goes like is simply that for a constant current , the current per unit area – current density – is and according to the microscopic , it's the current density that dictates the voltage per unit length of the wire (also known as the electric field): Comparing this equation with the usual Ohm's law , we see that Because you're only changing while are kept fixed, you see that . Magnetic fields don't play any role here at all while electric fields do play role but we never calculate any "electric flux" to construct the right justification. Ohm's law answered Jun 10 '13 at 17:39 Luboš Motl 110k 7 162 323 well the resistance you are talking about is the resistance which the flow of current experiences because of collision of electrons with fixed kernels. the value of this resistance is inversely proportional to area of conductor answered Jun 13 '13 at 19:22 manuja 1 1 Let's analyse each segment of your post: It is said that resistance is inversely proportional to area of cross section. Yes, that is true for an conductor when other physical parameters are fixed (length, resistivity, temperature) But greater area will have greater electric flux... Yes. ...and greater electric flux will have greater magnetic flux... The Electric current in the conductor will cause a magnetic field that wraps around the conductor, the field (or flux density) will be proportional to the current.

Upload: tapasrout

Post on 27-Sep-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

vvf

TRANSCRIPT

  • 4/4/2015 electromagnetismQuestionregardinginverserelationofresistancewithareaofcrosssectionPhysicsStackExchange

    http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/67608/questionregardinginverserelationofresistancewithareaofcrosssection 1/2

    signup login tour help

    Takethe2minutetour PhysicsStackExchangeisaquestionandanswersiteforactiveresearchers,academicsandstudentsofphysics.It's100%free,noregistrationrequired.

    Questionregardinginverserelationofresistancewithareaofcrosssection

    Itissaidthatresistanceisinverselyproportionaltoareaofcrosssection.Butgreaterareawillhavegreaterelectricflux,andgreaterelectricfluxwillhavegreatermagneticflux,andgreaterthemagneticfluxwillhavegreatereddycurrent,whichisoppositetothecurrentflowing.Sothiswillopposethecurrenthenceresistanceincreases.AmIright?

    electromagnetism electrostatics resistance

    editedJun10'13at18:51Qmechanic 44.1k 6 61 138

    askedJun10'13at17:22kuldeepsingh11 1

    3Answers

    Eveniftheclaimwerecorrect,youwouldnotbe youwouldbe whilethestatementyouaremakingwouldbe .)

    true righttrue

    Buttheexplanationyouareofferingisn'tright.Thereasonwhytheresistancegoeslike issimplythatforaconstantcurrent ,thecurrentperunitareacurrentdensityis andaccordingtothemicroscopic ,it'sthecurrentdensitythatdictatesthevoltageperunitlengthofthewire(alsoknownastheelectricfield):

    ComparingthisequationwiththeusualOhm'slaw ,weseethat

    Becauseyou'reonlychanging while arekeptfixed,youseethat .Magneticfieldsdon'tplayanyrolehereatallwhileelectricfieldsdoplayrolebutwenevercalculateany"electricflux"toconstructtherightjustification.

    1/AI j = I/A

    Ohm'slaw J = E

    | | = V

    E

    1

    I

    A

    V = RI

    R =

    A

    A , V 1/A

    answeredJun10'13at17:39LuboMotl110k 7 162 323

    welltheresistanceyouaretalkingaboutistheresistancewhichtheflowofcurrentexperiencesbecauseofcollisionofelectronswithfixedkernels.thevalueofthisresistanceisinverselyproportionaltoareaofconductor

    answeredJun13'13at19:22manuja1 1

    Let'sanalyseeachsegmentofyourpost:

    Itissaidthatresistanceisinverselyproportionaltoareaofcrosssection.

    Yes,thatistrueforanconductorwhenotherphysicalparametersarefixed(length,resistivity,temperature)

    Butgreaterareawillhavegreaterelectricflux...

    Yes.

    ...andgreaterelectricfluxwillhavegreatermagneticflux...

    TheElectriccurrentintheconductorwillcauseamagneticfieldthatwrapsaroundtheconductor,thefield(orfluxdensity)willbeproportionaltothecurrent.

    http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/electrostaticshttp://physics.stackexchange.com/users/2451/qmechanichttp://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/67608/question-regarding-inverse-relation-of-resistance-with-area-of-cross-sectionhttps://physics.stackexchange.com/users/login?returnurl=http%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67608%2fquestion-regarding-inverse-relation-of-resistance-with-area-of-cross-sectionhttp://physics.stackexchange.com/users/2451/qmechanichttp://physics.stackexchange.com/posts/67608/revisionshttps://physics.stackexchange.com/users/signup?returnurl=http%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67608%2fquestion-regarding-inverse-relation-of-resistance-with-area-of-cross-sectionhttp://physics.stackexchange.com/tourhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm%27s_lawhttp://physics.stackexchange.com/users/24934/manujahttp://physics.stackexchange.com/tourhttp://physics.stackexchange.com/users/24934/manujahttp://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/resistancehttp://stackexchange.com/http://physics.stackexchange.com/users/1236/lubo%c5%a1-motlhttp://physics.stackexchange.com/users/25615/kuldeep-singhhttp://physics.stackexchange.com/users/25615/kuldeep-singhhttp://physics.stackexchange.com/users/1236/lubo%c5%a1-motlhttp://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/electromagnetism
  • 4/4/2015 electromagnetismQuestionregardinginverserelationofresistancewithareaofcrosssectionPhysicsStackExchange

    http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/67608/questionregardinginverserelationofresistancewithareaofcrosssection 2/2

    ...andgreaterthemagneticfluxwillhavegreatereddycurrent,whichisoppositetothecurrentflowing.

    Thatwouldbethecase ifthemagneticfluxchanges,whichinturnmeansthatthecurrentandvoltagehastochangewithtime.Inotherwords:itdoesnotmatterforDC.IwillignorethevariousformsoffluctuatingcurrentandonlyfocusonsinusoidalAC.

    only

    TheeddycurrentsinhighfrequencyACcauseavarietyofeffects,themostrelevantofwhich,inthiscaseofasingleconductoris' '.Buteveninthatcase,theresistanceisinverselyproportionaltodiameter(decreaseswithincreaseinarea):

    Skineffect

    whereiscalledtheskindepth.Theskindepthisthusdefinedasthedepthbelowthesurfaceoftheconductoratwhichthecurrentdensityhasfallento1/e(about0.37)ofcurrentdensityatsurface.

    Sothiswillopposethecurrenthenceresistanceincreases.AmIright?

    Yes,resistancedoesincreasewhenyoutakeintoaccounttheeffectofeddycurrentincertainsituations(fluctuatingvoltagelikehighfreqAC) justDCwithouteddycurrents.Butifyouimpliedthatlargerareadoesnotdecreaseresistance,youarewronginthiscase.

    comparedto

    answeredJul13'13at22:44mehfoos923 1 4 15

    http://physics.stackexchange.com/users/26633/mehfooshttp://physics.stackexchange.com/users/26633/mehfoos