electronic journals of meteorology publishing research online ejssm
DESCRIPTION
Electronic Journals of Meteorology Publishing Research Online http://www.EJSSM.org. EJSSM - To improve understanding, prediction, preparedness and mitigation of severe storm hazards, through: Theoretical development of conceptual and predictive models - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Electronic Journals of Meteorology
Publishing Research Online
httpwwwEJSSMorg
bull EJSSM - To improve understanding prediction preparedness and mitigation of severe storm hazards through 1048707 Theoretical development of conceptual and predictive models
1048707 Observational and diagnostic studies
1048707 Operational forecasting techniques and methods
1048707 Historical and biographical studies
1048707 Review articles
1048707 Interdisciplinary studies of risks and impacts including storm damage analyses social implications and economic effects
bull EJSSM will publish research articles research and technical notes book reviews letters and comments on prior papers Papers on theory prediction methods and techniques causes impacts and measuring and monitoring in the following areas are welcome 1048707 Severe convective weather 1048707 Lightning and related storm electrification 1048707 Severe tropical weather systems 1048707 Damage analysis and mitigation 1048707 Scientific documentation and analysis of extreme andor rare events 1048707 Forecast development and verification concepts 1048707 Climatology of andor influencing severe storm events 1048707 Severe winter storms 1048707 Heavy rainfall events 1048707 Pyroconvective storms and fire storms
bull EJSSM Core Principles Open access
Uphold high standards
Encourage participation
Rapid dissemination and immediate feedback
bull Founders include Dr Robert Maddox Dr CA Doswell III Dr John
Monteverdi Dr Erik Rasmussen Dr David Schultz Brian Curran Albert Pietrycha Al Moller Jim Johnson Roger Edwards Elke Edwards
bull Current Editors Roger Edwards ndash Editor in Chief
Dr David Schultz ndash Assistant Editor in Chief
Albert Pietrycha ndash Section Editor
bull Why an operational forecaster should publishhellip More familiar with forecasting difficulties
Witness more of the quirks of the ldquorealrdquo atmosphere
Can identify research problems for pure researchers
Career advancement
Why Publish Online
Costhellip
Formathellip
Availabilityhellip
Immutabilityhellip
Qualityhellip
Acceptancehellip
bull Costhellip AMS = $ 135 per paper page (BampW)
$ 490$390$190 first second and third color piece
NWA = Apparently free to NWA members
EJSSM = $50 per entire article (50mb) ndash Color Free
bull Formathellip Standard Formats =
bull Abstract only HTML amp PDF
++ PLUS ++
bull Encourages color multimedia animations and new graphic techniques
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull EJSSM - To improve understanding prediction preparedness and mitigation of severe storm hazards through 1048707 Theoretical development of conceptual and predictive models
1048707 Observational and diagnostic studies
1048707 Operational forecasting techniques and methods
1048707 Historical and biographical studies
1048707 Review articles
1048707 Interdisciplinary studies of risks and impacts including storm damage analyses social implications and economic effects
bull EJSSM will publish research articles research and technical notes book reviews letters and comments on prior papers Papers on theory prediction methods and techniques causes impacts and measuring and monitoring in the following areas are welcome 1048707 Severe convective weather 1048707 Lightning and related storm electrification 1048707 Severe tropical weather systems 1048707 Damage analysis and mitigation 1048707 Scientific documentation and analysis of extreme andor rare events 1048707 Forecast development and verification concepts 1048707 Climatology of andor influencing severe storm events 1048707 Severe winter storms 1048707 Heavy rainfall events 1048707 Pyroconvective storms and fire storms
bull EJSSM Core Principles Open access
Uphold high standards
Encourage participation
Rapid dissemination and immediate feedback
bull Founders include Dr Robert Maddox Dr CA Doswell III Dr John
Monteverdi Dr Erik Rasmussen Dr David Schultz Brian Curran Albert Pietrycha Al Moller Jim Johnson Roger Edwards Elke Edwards
bull Current Editors Roger Edwards ndash Editor in Chief
Dr David Schultz ndash Assistant Editor in Chief
Albert Pietrycha ndash Section Editor
bull Why an operational forecaster should publishhellip More familiar with forecasting difficulties
Witness more of the quirks of the ldquorealrdquo atmosphere
Can identify research problems for pure researchers
Career advancement
Why Publish Online
Costhellip
Formathellip
Availabilityhellip
Immutabilityhellip
Qualityhellip
Acceptancehellip
bull Costhellip AMS = $ 135 per paper page (BampW)
$ 490$390$190 first second and third color piece
NWA = Apparently free to NWA members
EJSSM = $50 per entire article (50mb) ndash Color Free
bull Formathellip Standard Formats =
bull Abstract only HTML amp PDF
++ PLUS ++
bull Encourages color multimedia animations and new graphic techniques
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull EJSSM will publish research articles research and technical notes book reviews letters and comments on prior papers Papers on theory prediction methods and techniques causes impacts and measuring and monitoring in the following areas are welcome 1048707 Severe convective weather 1048707 Lightning and related storm electrification 1048707 Severe tropical weather systems 1048707 Damage analysis and mitigation 1048707 Scientific documentation and analysis of extreme andor rare events 1048707 Forecast development and verification concepts 1048707 Climatology of andor influencing severe storm events 1048707 Severe winter storms 1048707 Heavy rainfall events 1048707 Pyroconvective storms and fire storms
bull EJSSM Core Principles Open access
Uphold high standards
Encourage participation
Rapid dissemination and immediate feedback
bull Founders include Dr Robert Maddox Dr CA Doswell III Dr John
Monteverdi Dr Erik Rasmussen Dr David Schultz Brian Curran Albert Pietrycha Al Moller Jim Johnson Roger Edwards Elke Edwards
bull Current Editors Roger Edwards ndash Editor in Chief
Dr David Schultz ndash Assistant Editor in Chief
Albert Pietrycha ndash Section Editor
bull Why an operational forecaster should publishhellip More familiar with forecasting difficulties
Witness more of the quirks of the ldquorealrdquo atmosphere
Can identify research problems for pure researchers
Career advancement
Why Publish Online
Costhellip
Formathellip
Availabilityhellip
Immutabilityhellip
Qualityhellip
Acceptancehellip
bull Costhellip AMS = $ 135 per paper page (BampW)
$ 490$390$190 first second and third color piece
NWA = Apparently free to NWA members
EJSSM = $50 per entire article (50mb) ndash Color Free
bull Formathellip Standard Formats =
bull Abstract only HTML amp PDF
++ PLUS ++
bull Encourages color multimedia animations and new graphic techniques
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull EJSSM Core Principles Open access
Uphold high standards
Encourage participation
Rapid dissemination and immediate feedback
bull Founders include Dr Robert Maddox Dr CA Doswell III Dr John
Monteverdi Dr Erik Rasmussen Dr David Schultz Brian Curran Albert Pietrycha Al Moller Jim Johnson Roger Edwards Elke Edwards
bull Current Editors Roger Edwards ndash Editor in Chief
Dr David Schultz ndash Assistant Editor in Chief
Albert Pietrycha ndash Section Editor
bull Why an operational forecaster should publishhellip More familiar with forecasting difficulties
Witness more of the quirks of the ldquorealrdquo atmosphere
Can identify research problems for pure researchers
Career advancement
Why Publish Online
Costhellip
Formathellip
Availabilityhellip
Immutabilityhellip
Qualityhellip
Acceptancehellip
bull Costhellip AMS = $ 135 per paper page (BampW)
$ 490$390$190 first second and third color piece
NWA = Apparently free to NWA members
EJSSM = $50 per entire article (50mb) ndash Color Free
bull Formathellip Standard Formats =
bull Abstract only HTML amp PDF
++ PLUS ++
bull Encourages color multimedia animations and new graphic techniques
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull Founders include Dr Robert Maddox Dr CA Doswell III Dr John
Monteverdi Dr Erik Rasmussen Dr David Schultz Brian Curran Albert Pietrycha Al Moller Jim Johnson Roger Edwards Elke Edwards
bull Current Editors Roger Edwards ndash Editor in Chief
Dr David Schultz ndash Assistant Editor in Chief
Albert Pietrycha ndash Section Editor
bull Why an operational forecaster should publishhellip More familiar with forecasting difficulties
Witness more of the quirks of the ldquorealrdquo atmosphere
Can identify research problems for pure researchers
Career advancement
Why Publish Online
Costhellip
Formathellip
Availabilityhellip
Immutabilityhellip
Qualityhellip
Acceptancehellip
bull Costhellip AMS = $ 135 per paper page (BampW)
$ 490$390$190 first second and third color piece
NWA = Apparently free to NWA members
EJSSM = $50 per entire article (50mb) ndash Color Free
bull Formathellip Standard Formats =
bull Abstract only HTML amp PDF
++ PLUS ++
bull Encourages color multimedia animations and new graphic techniques
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull Why an operational forecaster should publishhellip More familiar with forecasting difficulties
Witness more of the quirks of the ldquorealrdquo atmosphere
Can identify research problems for pure researchers
Career advancement
Why Publish Online
Costhellip
Formathellip
Availabilityhellip
Immutabilityhellip
Qualityhellip
Acceptancehellip
bull Costhellip AMS = $ 135 per paper page (BampW)
$ 490$390$190 first second and third color piece
NWA = Apparently free to NWA members
EJSSM = $50 per entire article (50mb) ndash Color Free
bull Formathellip Standard Formats =
bull Abstract only HTML amp PDF
++ PLUS ++
bull Encourages color multimedia animations and new graphic techniques
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
Why Publish Online
Costhellip
Formathellip
Availabilityhellip
Immutabilityhellip
Qualityhellip
Acceptancehellip
bull Costhellip AMS = $ 135 per paper page (BampW)
$ 490$390$190 first second and third color piece
NWA = Apparently free to NWA members
EJSSM = $50 per entire article (50mb) ndash Color Free
bull Formathellip Standard Formats =
bull Abstract only HTML amp PDF
++ PLUS ++
bull Encourages color multimedia animations and new graphic techniques
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull Costhellip AMS = $ 135 per paper page (BampW)
$ 490$390$190 first second and third color piece
NWA = Apparently free to NWA members
EJSSM = $50 per entire article (50mb) ndash Color Free
bull Formathellip Standard Formats =
bull Abstract only HTML amp PDF
++ PLUS ++
bull Encourages color multimedia animations and new graphic techniques
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull Formathellip Standard Formats =
bull Abstract only HTML amp PDF
++ PLUS ++
bull Encourages color multimedia animations and new graphic techniques
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull Availabilityhellip AMS = Full E-Journals Access to fees paid members
only
NWA = Full E-Journal Access FREE
EJSSM = Full Journals Access FREE
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull Immutabilityhellip ldquoLOCKSSrdquo ndash lockssorg ndash Stanford University
bull Replication amp Format Migration ndash
LOCKSS used by
bull AMS Oxford University Press British Medical Journal Brookings Institute Library of Congress
bull US Universities ndash Hawaii Duke Nebraska Rice Michigan State Penn State Penn Illinois C-U Yale Emory NC State Kentucky many morehellip
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull Qualityhellip AMS - Double blind peer review ndash closed review
process ndash 3 reviewers - 18 mos ndash 2 yrs turn around
NWA - Double blind peer review ndash closed review process ndash 1 to 2 reviewers
EJSSM - Open peer review ndash open review process (reviews and replies published too) ndash 3 reviewers ndash several mos turn around
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
REVIEWER COMMENTS[Authorsrsquo responses in orange serif ]REVIEWER A (Richard L Thompson)Initial ReviewRecommendation Accept with major revisionThe paper provides an overview of several common parametersindices used in severe storm forecasting and outlines a process for developing proper forecast parameters On the surface this topic appears worthy of consideration but I have several concerns regarding the tone of the paper and the apparent motivation of the authors Without providing supporting evidence the authors infer that a substantial number of forecasters have no clue how to interpret the convective parametersindices they discuss Can the authors site anything more specific than a few vague references It is important to establish reasonable motivation for this work because that motivation identifies the target audience At this point it could be anyone in severe storm meteorology but this work seems most appropriate for undergraduate meteorology students I can only
speak for myself but I found this paper to be mildly degrading to professional forecasters
We regret that you had this reaction to the manuscript as that surely was not our intention Our intention was to educate forecasters not degrade them Our intended audience was anyone in severe storms meteorology as we believe that even experts would benefit from revisiting the ideas in this manuscript In the revised manuscript we have softened the tone and rewritten the introduction so that our intentions and
intended audience are more clear
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
Given the structure of the existing manuscript I find it somewhat difficult to insert this in some appropriate place Although I obviously believe in the importance of this Irsquom not sure it represents a major milestone in the research process Hence Irsquove not followed the suggestion with some lingering misgivings about not doing so
3) Section 6c You mention that scientific storm chasing began with the Tornado Intercept Project that had the goal of filming tornado debris clouds You then mention the use of mobile field observations to provide quantitative data in the last paragraph When did scientists start bringing data collection platforms beyond cameras into the field
An interesting point This is sort of hard to know hellip just what sort of system constitutes quantitative sampling during storm chases I have discovered that the Knights began collecting hailstones as they were falling for the purpose of studying them later in their lab during 1966 There might be others but I might not know of them[Minor comments omitted]
Comments on this articlebull Comments Open Elke Edwards (2007-01-04) View all comments | Add comment
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull Acceptancehellip EJSSM International Standard Serial Number
(ISSN ndash 1559-5404)
Listed as scientific resource with Meteorological and Geophysical Abstracts (MGA) Scientific Commons Notes In The Margin Univ of Melbourne (AU) Board of Greek Librarians (GR) Biblioplanets (FR) Tutor Gig Encyclopedia Universitaumlts du Frankfurt amp Darmstadt (DE) Deutsche Nationalbibliotek (DE) Institut de Lrsquoinformation Scientifique et Technique (FR) Instituto Brasileiro de Informaccedilatildeo (PO) Internet Public Library (IPL 11999341hellip
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull How to publish in EJSSMhellip Download authorrsquos template
Cut paste and edit your manuscript into template including colour figures animationshellipetchellip
Upload completed submission
Editors will contact you and assign reviewers
On completion of open review process and acceptance of manuscript work is published immediately
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
bull EJSSM ndash Current Challengeshellip
Need to publish 5 articles per quarter to achieve recognition from Thomson Citation Indexhellip
Need additional copy editor volunteershellip
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-
httpwwwlockssorg
httppkpsfuca
httpwwwEJSSMorg
Questions
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
-