email regarding review of nq documents

17
From: Kiefer, Robyn V CIV USARMY CENWK (US) To: Barker, Justin Subject: West Lake review of NQ documents Date: Monday, November 13, 2017 5:15:37 PM Attachments: TMP Results.xlsx Justin: I asked our Mechanical engineer to review the NQ Annual report and asked she address the two key questions you and I discussed via the phone. Following are key points from our mechanical engineer's review of the NQ Annual report. 1. There was significant frustration in reviewing the report that the reports are inconsistently presenting data. Data is either presented in a different format or from different locations. While all reports included the classic TMP temperature graphs, the three monthly reports from Oct through Dec 16 only include the four TMP-SMP1 through 4, which were installed with the heat extraction barrier. The study report, date Nov 15, included TMP from 40 different locations. This latest report for the one year mark includes a total of 57 TMP locations of which 17 are either new or newly reported. These 17 are stated to be located in the neck area or the north quarry. However, no map can be found. 2. Question: Is the heat extraction infrastructure that is in place let us know if the SSE is moving (temp probes located to tell if the heat is increasing in an area, any indication of rising heat in any areas)?. Answer: Yes and no. What is in place are TMP locations in an approximate line through the north quarry from a point slightly north and on the west side of the neck that is parallel to the east edge of the north quarry closet to the neck from the neck north. (These are the following TMP; 21-23,16, 25, 17, 27, 18, 28 and 29, list in increasing distance from the neck. This values are either stable or cooling.) There is a line of TMP located across the neck. (These are the following TMP; 2-4, including 3R and 4R, list from west to east. This values are stable.) There are the two new ones north of the HEB, TMP-SPM-3 and 4. (These are cooling.) There are the two new ones south of the HEB, TMP-SPM-1 and 2. (One is cooling, while the cooler one is warming. The average is lower.) There are a few located between the original wells and the new wells. (These are the following TMP; 11 and 14R, list in increasing distance from the neck. This values are either stable or cooling.) There are TMP scattered around the original piolet wells. (These are the following TMP; 19,20,10-9N, 10-5N, 10-5S, 10-9S, 5-9N, 5-5N, 5-5S, and 5-9S. This values are cooling.) And there are a few TMP extending into the south quarry. (These are the following TMP; 15, 7R, 8, 31 and 32, list in increasing distance from the neck. This values are cooling.) The initial installation appeared to be rather scattered vs. uniform grids. We recognize that TMP locations can be based upon where there is access. However, there is the possibility that if there is an irregular spread of a heat front, it could sneak past the TMPs. It is the reviewer's opinion that TMP should be both reported relative to the location, which this last report attempted to do, but more information is required. What is the relative position and distance from the heat extraction barrier for each TMP location? This information goes a long way in evaluating the performance of the system. 3. Question: Is the heat extraction system cooling the surrounding area? (YES) Can we state that the cooling loops are in place and can assist in cooling the area, so if there is evidence that heat is rising that the existing system will help slow any northward advancement of the SSE? Answer: Most likely yes, but there are too many possible variables to give a definitive answer. Please keep in mind the large mass of the waste we are attempting to cool. The changes plus or minus are subtle. The heat extraction barrier included the addition of 4 new temperature monitoring wells; two just north of the new

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Email Regarding Review of NQ documentsFrom: Kiefer, Robyn V CIV USARMY CENWK (US) To: Barker, Justin Subject: West Lake review of NQ documents Date: Monday, November 13, 2017 5:15:37 PM Attachments: TMP Results.xlsx
Justin:
I asked our Mechanical engineer to review the NQ Annual report and asked she address the two key questions you and I discussed via the phone. Following are key points from our mechanical engineer's review of the NQ Annual report.
1. There was significant frustration in reviewing the report that the reports are inconsistently presenting data. Data is either presented in a different format or from different locations. While all reports included the classic TMP temperature graphs, the three monthly reports from Oct through Dec 16 only include the four TMP-SMP1 through 4, which were installed with the heat extraction barrier. The study report, date Nov 15, included TMP from 40 different locations. This latest report for the one year mark includes a total of 57 TMP locations of which 17 are either new or newly reported. These 17 are stated to be located in the neck area or the north quarry. However, no map can be found.
2. Question: Is the heat extraction infrastructure that is in place let us know if the SSE is moving (temp probes located to tell if the heat is increasing in an area, any indication of rising heat in any areas)?.
Answer: Yes and no.
What is in place are TMP locations in an approximate line through the north quarry from a point slightly north and on the west side of the neck that is parallel to the east edge of the north quarry closet to the neck from the neck north. (These are the following TMP; 21-23,16, 25, 17, 27, 18, 28 and 29, list in increasing distance from the neck. This values are either stable or cooling.) There is a line of TMP located across the neck. (These are the following TMP; 2-4, including 3R and 4R, list from west to east. This values are stable.) There are the two new ones north of the HEB, TMP-SPM-3 and 4. (These are cooling.) There are the two new ones south of the HEB, TMP-SPM-1 and 2. (One is cooling, while the cooler one is warming. The average is lower.) There are a few located between the original wells and the new wells. (These are the following TMP; 11 and 14R, list in increasing distance from the neck. This values are either stable or cooling.) There are TMP scattered around the original piolet wells. (These are the following TMP; 19,20,10-9N, 10-5N, 10-5S, 10-9S, 5-9N, 5-5N, 5-5S, and 5-9S. This values are cooling.) And there are a few TMP extending into the south quarry. (These are the following TMP; 15, 7R, 8, 31 and 32, list in increasing distance from the neck. This values are cooling.)
The initial installation appeared to be rather scattered vs. uniform grids. We recognize that TMP locations can be based upon where there is access. However, there is the possibility that if there is an irregular spread of a heat front, it could sneak past the TMPs.
It is the reviewer's opinion that TMP should be both reported relative to the location, which this last report attempted to do, but more information is required. What is the relative position and distance from the heat extraction barrier for each TMP location? This information goes a long way in evaluating the performance of the system.
3. Question: Is the heat extraction system cooling the surrounding area? (YES) Can we state that the cooling loops are in place and can assist in cooling the area, so if there is evidence that heat is rising that the existing system will help slow any northward advancement of the SSE?
Answer: Most likely yes, but there are too many possible variables to give a definitive answer.
Please keep in mind the large mass of the waste we are attempting to cool. The changes plus or minus are subtle.
The heat extraction barrier included the addition of 4 new temperature monitoring wells; two just north of the new
NEW OR NEWLY REPORTED without a map of the locations
NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS
TMP-34
110
TMP-35
110
TMP-36
80
TMP-37
100
TMP-38
120
TMP-39
120
TMP-40
130
TMP-41
130
TMP-42
120
TMP-43
130
TMP-44
155
TMP-45
90
TMP-46
90
TMP-47
80
TMP-48
75
TMP-49
70
TMP-16R
170
TMP-25R
160
TMP-28R
130
TMP-6
160
160
20
TMP-24
140
140
nuetral
2
TMP-SPM3
135
150
155
155
cooling
1
Northern boundary conditions
4
TMP-10-9N
165
170
180
cooling
13
TMP-7R
260
Southern boundary conditions
TMP-31
275
280
280
cooling
TMP-32
260
280
280
cooling
14
TMP-5
>160
160
heating
S HEW/N OHEW
TMP-7R
260
TMP-8
>140
TMP-9
200
220
cooling
TMP-31
275
280
280
cooling
TMP-10
170
TMP-12
200
TMP-13
140
TMP-30
TMP-7
TMP-7R
260
TMP-8
>140
TMP-9
200
220
cooling
TMP-10
170
TMP-10-9N
165
170
180
cooling
TMP-12
200
TMP-13
140
TMP-14
200
equalizing
TMP-16
160
160
nuetral
TMP-17
160
160
nuetral
TMP-20
270
270
270
nuetral
TMP-21
90
90
nuetral
TMP-26
120
120
equalizing
TMP-29
130
heating
TMP-32
260
280
280
cooling
TMP-33
90
TMP-34
110
TMP-35
110
TMP-36
80
TMP-37
100
TMP-38
120
TMP-39
120
TMP-40
130
TMP-41
130
TMP-42
120
TMP-43
130
TMP-44
155
TMP-45
90
TMP-46
90
TMP-47
80
TMP-48
75
TMP-49
70
Report Content
Nov-15
table
map
map
details
tmp
heat kw
map
details
Appendix J - Performance Monitoring Plan
EXPANDED HEAT REMOVAL PILOT STUDY QUARTERLY REPORT
Jan-16
tmp
heat kw
map
map
field notes
Oct-16
tmp
table
heat kw
TABLE, NOT F
map
Nov-16
tmp
TABLE, NOT F
TABLE, NOT F
Appendix B Attachment 3 GIW Locations FieldMeasured Temperature and FLOW
TABLE
Appendix B Attachment 4 HEW Locations FieldMeasured Temperature and FLOW
TABLE
map
Dec-16
tmp
TABLE, NOT F
TABLE, NOT F
Appendix B Attachment 3 GIW / HEW Flow Meter / Raw Temperature Results
TABLE, NOT F
Appendix B Attachment 4 GIW Locations FieldMeasured Temperature and FLOW
MANUAL DATA
Appendix B Attachment 6 – Density and Heat Capacity Properties of GLYCOL
GRAPH
map
heat extraction wells (HEW-1 thru 16) and two just south of the new wells and north of the original pilot project wells. During the course of the last year the two sets of temperatures north of the HEW-1 thru 16 are lower, dropping 10 to 20 degrees F. The two sets of temperatures just south of the HEW-1 thru 16 have mixed results, but in average are cooler or the same. For all four probes, the maximum temperature is at or below 200 F, when before one was over 200 F by as much as 10 degrees F. The fact that some temperatures are higher to the south of the HEW-1 thru 16 does not deter from the heat that has been extracted as the rise in temperature can be a function of the heat (energy) moving toward the system to be extracted and not necessarily the SSE spreading.
Please note that "The original model also predicted rising temperatures in the region between the southern line of Gas Interceptor well extractors (GIW) and the line of heat extractor well (HEW) units." This is the movement of energy toward the wells for removal discussed above.
Out of 14 TMP located south of the new HEB, one close to the barrier is warming and another located between the rows of the piolet wells is neutral. All others, 12 out of 14 are cooling at this time.
Out of the 20 TMP north of the new HEB with more than one data report, all but 2 or 3 are either stable or cooling. Two show slight signs of warming while a third appears to be equalizing its temperature along its length.
See the excel sheet attached with a summary of TMP reports. The temperatures noted are the maximum along a length of a TMP.
Keep in mind the report's claim that "The 220 degree F isotherm line has either been stationary or has retreated south in the vicinity of GIW-10 (See Appendix E)."
Only time will tell if this statement is correct: "For all dates the model depicts lowering temperatures within the vicinity of the HEW line and temperatures below 170 degrees F at all locations from 40 feet south of the HEB line northward. The model results also show the HEB line acts as a line with overlapping zones of influence, negating the need for any additional heat exchange devices between the current HEB units."
The analysis did claim the following:
1) The SSE or the heat generated from it is reducing on its own. 2) "In general the inflowing water to the exchange units was warmer than assumed, and varied hourly as opposed to monthly." 3) "...energy removed was approximately 70% of the actual measured amounts on the HEW..." 4) "increasing the heat conduction of the waste from 1.4 to 1.6 W/mK" to better simulate the measured conditions. (They tweaked the model to match measured results.) 5) Increasing "the heat capacity of the waste from 2.4 to 2.6 Mjoule/m3" to better simulate the measured conditions. (They tweaked the model to match measured results.) 6) They also tweaked some correction factors to better simulate the measured conditions. 7) Remodeling into September 2019 "predicted continuing reduced temperatures in vicinity of the HEW line and a reduction in the rate of energy extraction." 8) " the energy released via decomposition of the waste under normal conditions diminishes with time and becomes near zero when temperatures elevate above 167 °F, above this temperature the bacteria responsible for generating methane die." 9) Southern boundary conditions were based on " readings from TMP-8 and TMP-7R from earlier dates (prior to failure of the units)." Higher than implied by TMP-31 &32. 10) Model assumed a more constant average inlet temperature vs. the measured inlet temperatures that varied too much for the model. The model would crash. (They tweaked the model to match measured results.) 11) "... a slight increasing of the temperatures closer to the ground surface."
Let us know when you'd like to discuss. Note that we'll need some advance notice for any discussion due to our mechanical engineer's workload.
Thanks, Robyn
Hi Robyn,
I left you a voice message earlier today regarding a request to have your team review two North Quarry related documents that were recently provided by the Parties. The specific documents are:
Heat Extraction Barrier Performance Report
* One-Year Report - Oct. 11, 2017 <Blockedhttp://dnr.mo.gov/env/swmp/facilities/documents/year1heatextractionbBarrierperformancereport10-11- 17.pdf> (posted 10/13/17)
* Construction Quality Assurance Acceptance Report October 2017 <Blockedhttp://dnr.mo.gov/env/swmp/facilities/documents/bt-125certreport10112017.pdf> (posted 10/13/17)
For further reference the web-link below is to the MDNR - Bridgeton Landfill web-site.
Blockedhttp://dnr.mo.gov/env/swmp/facilities/BridgetonSanitaryLandfill-RCP.htm
Let's plan to discuss this item during an upcoming project call/meeting. These items are not the highest priority at this time.
Thanks,
Phone: 913-551-7789
Cell 816-372-0844
10/11/2017 Dec-16 Nov-16 Oct-16 Jan-16 11/1/2015 TMP-33 90 TMP-34 110 TMP-35 110 TMP-36 80 TMP-37 100 TMP-38 120 TMP-39 120 TMP-40 130 TMP-41 130 TMP-42 120 TMP-43 130 TMP-44 155 TMP-45 90 TMP-46 90 TMP-47 80 TMP-48 75 TMP-49 70 TMP-16R 170 TMP-25R 160 TMP-28R 130 TMP-6 160 160 TMP-24 140 140 nuetral TMP-26 120 120 equalizing TMP-29 130 heating TMP-28 140 140 cooling TMP-18 > 150 150 heating TMP-27 160 160 nuetral
TMP-17 160 160 nuetral TMP-25 160 160 nuetral
TMP-16 160 160 nuetral TMP-23 140 140 cooling TMP-22 125 130 cooling TMP-21 90 90 nuetral TMP-1 140 140 nuetral TMP-2 2R - 160 160 nuetral TMP-3 <160 <160 nuetral TMP-3R 160 160 nuetral TMP-4R <130 130 cooling TMP-SPM4 165 175 175 175 cooling TMP-SPM3 135 150 155 155 cooling
Approximent Max Temperature Action or Reaction
NEW OR NEWLY REPORTED without a map of the locations
HEAT EXTRACTION BARRIER
TMP-SPM1 200 200 200 195 warming TMP-SPM2 195 210 210 210 cooling
TMP-19 240 250 250 cooling TMP-20 270 270 270 nuetral TMP-10-9N 165 170 180 cooling TMP-10-5N 120 130 140 cooling TMP-10-5S 200 235 240 cooling TMP-10-9S 220 260 260 cooling TMP-5-9N 160/260 <270 270 cooling TMP-5-5N 120/250 255 260 cooling TMP-5-5S 260 <270 <270 cooling TMP-5-9S 260 270 270 cooling TMP-15 TMP-7R 260 TMP-8 >140 TMP-31 275 280 280 cooling TMP-32 260 280 280 cooling
TMP-5 >160 160 heating
TMP-11 11R - 130 170
different location - both north of HEW
TMP-14 200 equalizing TMP-14R 200 200 200 nuetral TMP-7 TMP-7R 260 TMP-8 >140 TMP-9 200 220 cooling TMP-31 275 280 280 cooling
TMP-10 170 TMP-12 200 TMP-13 140 TMP-30
Location
NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS 20 Far NORTH QUARRY TMPS 19 Far NORTH QUARRY TMPS 18 NORTH QUARRY TMPS bed rock 17 NORTH QUARRY TMPS 16 NORTH QUARRY TMPS 15 NORTH QUARRY TMPS 14
NORTH QUARRY TMPS
Northern boundary conditions 11
NORTH QUARRY TMPS 10 NORTH QUARRY TMPS 9 NORTH QUARRY TMPS bed rock 8 NECK AREA bed rock 7 NECK AREA 6 NECK AREA 5 NECK AREA 4 NECK AREA bed rock 3 19 feet north of the HEB line 2 14 feet north of the HEB line 1
S HEB 1 S HEB 2
B -GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS
Northern boundary conditions 3
B -GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 4 GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 5 GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 6 GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 7 GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 8 GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 9 GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 10 GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 11 GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 12 Far S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 13 S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS Far S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS 14
NORTHERN MOST
HISTORIC SSE
Southern boundary conditions
S HEW/N OHEW
S HEW/N OHEW S HEW/N OHEW S HEW/N OHEW S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS
10/11/2017 Dec-16 Nov-16 Oct-16 Jan-16 11/1/2015 TMP-SPM1 200 200 200 195 TMP-SPM2 195 210 210 210 TMP-SPM3 135 150 155 155 TMP-SPM4 165 175 175 175 TMP-1 140 140 nuetral TMP-2 2R - 160 160 nuetral TMP-3 <160 <160 nuetral TMP-3R 160 160 nuetral TMP-4R <130 130 cooling TMP-5 >160 160 heating TMP-5-9N 160/260 <270 270 cooling TMP-5-5N 120/250 255 260 cooling TMP-5-5S 260 <270 <270 cooling TMP-5-9S 260 270 270 cooling TMP-6 160 160 TMP-7 TMP-7R 260 TMP-8 >140 TMP-9 200 220 cooling TMP-10 170 TMP-10-9N 165 170 180 cooling TMP-10-5N 120 130 140 cooling TMP-10-5S 200 235 240 cooling TMP-10-9S 220 260 260 cooling TMP-11 11R - 130 170 TMP-12 200 TMP-13 140 TMP-14 200 equalizing TMP-14R 200 200 200 nuetral TMP-15 TMP-16 160 160 nuetral TMP-16R 170 TMP-17 160 160 nuetral TMP-18 > 150 150 heating TMP-19 240 250 250 cooling TMP-20 270 270 270 nuetral TMP-21 90 90 nuetral TMP-22 125 130 cooling TMP-23 140 140 cooling TMP-24 140 140 nuetral TMP-25 160 160 nuetral TMP-25R 160 TMP-26 120 120 equalizing TMP-27 160 160 nuetral TMP-28 140 140 cooling
Approximent Max Temperature Action or Reaction
diffe
TMP-28R 130 TMP-29 130 heating TMP-30 TMP-31 275 280 280 cooling TMP-32 260 280 280 cooling TMP-33 90 TMP-34 110 TMP-35 110 TMP-36 80 TMP-37 100 TMP-38 120 TMP-39 120 TMP-40 130 TMP-41 130 TMP-42 120 TMP-43 130 TMP-44 155 TMP-45 90 TMP-46 90 TMP-47 80 TMP-48 75 TMP-49 70
Location
NECK AREA NECK AREA NECK AREA NECK AREA NECK AREA S HEW/N OHEW GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS
GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS
S HEW/N OHEW S HEW/N OHEW Far S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS B -GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS B -GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS Far NORTH QUARRY TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS Far NORTH QUARRY TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS
erent location - both north of HEW
NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NORTH QUARRY TMPS
S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS Far S of GIW PILOT SYSTEM TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS NECK AREA AND NORTH QUARRY TMPS
TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF A HEAT EXTRACTION BARRIER Nov-15
EXPANDED HEAT REMOVAL PILOT STUDY QUARTERLY REPORT Jan-16
Neck Heat Extraction System Monthly Report Oct-16
Neck Heat Extracon System Monthly Report Nov-16
Neck Heat Extracon System Monthly Report Dec-16
Appendix A – Settlement Map map Appendix B - Settlement Volume Analysis table Appendix C - Neck Area Conditions map
map details
Appendix E - Temperature Monitoring Probe Graphs tmp Appendix F - Heat Extraction Point Data heat kw
map details
Appendix H - Thermal Modeling Study Appendix I - Heat Extraction Barrier Design Plans Appendix J - Performance Monitoring Plan Appendix A – Temperature Monitoring Probe Graphs (Fourth Quarter 2015) tmp Appendix B – Heat Removal Point Data Graphs (Fourth Quarter) heat kw Appendix C – Temperature Monitoring Probe Layout map Appendix D – Heat Removal System Plan View map Appendix E – Heat Extraction System Operating Log (Fourth Quarter) field notes Appendix A – Temperature Monitoring Probe Graphs (October 2016) tmp
table heat kw
Appendix B - Attachment 1 – GIW Collector Heat Extraction Graphs heat kw Appendix B - Attachment 2 - HEW Heat Extraction Raw Data TABLE, NOT F Appendix C – Neck Heat Extraction System Plan View map Calculated Heat Energy Removal table Appendix A – Temperature Monitoring Probe Graphs (November 2016) tmp Appendix B - Attachment 1 – GIW Locations Raw Temperature Measurement TABLE, NOT F Appendix B - Attachment 2 - HEW Locations Raw Temperature Measurement TABLE, NOT F Appendix B - Attachment 3 - GIW Locations Field-Measured Temperature and FLOW TABLE Appendix B - Attachment 4 - HEW Locations Field-Measured Temperature and FLOW TABLE Appendix C – Neck Heat Extraction System Plan View map Calculated Heat Energy Removal table Appendix A – Temperature Monitoring Probe Graphs (December 2016) tmp Appendix B - Attachment 1 – GIW Locations Raw Temperature Measurement TABLE, NOT F Appendix B - Attachment 2 - HEW Locations Raw Temperature Measurement TABLE, NOT F Appendix B - Attachment 3 - GIW / HEW Flow Meter / Raw Temperature Results TABLE, NOT F Appendix B - Attachment 4 - GIW Locations Field-Measured Temperature and FLOW MANUAL DATA Appendix B - Attachment 6 – Density and Heat Capacity Properties of GLYCOL GRAPH Appendix C – Neck Heat Extraction System Plan View map
Appendix D - Temperature Monitor Probe Layout and Typical Detail
Appendix G - Current Heat Removal System
Appendix B – Heat Removal Point Data (October 2016)
A
DOC29 "Kiefer, Robyn V CIV USARMY CENWK (US)" 11/13/2017 West Lake review of NQ documents.pdf
DOC30 Attachment:1 TMP Results.xlsx