embankment load tests on a coal ash basin · embankment load tests on a coal ash basin thomas g....
TRANSCRIPT
Embankment Load Testson a Coal Ash Basin
Embankment Load Testson a Coal Ash Basin
Thomas G. Pace, PEAlan F. Rauch, PE, PhD
Geohazards in Transportation 2009
Outline
Site/Facility Overview
Project Background
Field Test Introduction
Instrumentation Program– Inclinometers– Observation System– Surveying– Settlement Arrays– Piezometers
Findings
E.W. Brown Generating Station Ash Treatment Basin
2000
1990
1980
1970
1960- Basin created
- Basin raised
- Basin raised
- Basin full
Cross-Section through Planned Embankment
Future Gypsum Embankment
Original Dam
1989 Overlay
Existing Ash Deposits
Future Ash Deposits
72 ft
1973 Overlay
Future Flexible Membrane Liner
2005 Field Test
Characterize ash as foundation material
Unscheduled interruption of operations
Dewatered ash basin
1 month to prepare, 1 month to conduct test
Aggressive plan to obtain maximum data
Instruments abandoned in place
Cold, wind, dust
In-situ Testing• Vane shear• Cone penetrometer• T-bar penetrometer• Downhole seismic• Nuclear density probe• Neutron probe
Instrumentation Program
Installed Instruments
Inclinometers
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3Lateral Displacement (ft)
East Fill
-0.1 0.0 0.1
840
850
860
870
880
890
Elevation (ft)
West Fill
Observation System
Purpose– Record of construction progress– Capture events engineers miss
Construction– Color security camera– Time-Lapse VCR
Lessons Learned– Automatic digital stills better– Vantage point difficult– No scale reference
Surveying
Differential GPS
Uses– Construction Layout– Locating Instruments– Monitoring Fill Height
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120Horizontal Offset from Baseline (ft)
880
890
900
910
Elev
atio
n (ft
)
20-Nov 2:00 pm20-Nov 4:30 pm21-Nov 2:30 pm21-Nov 5:15 pm23-Nov 8:18 am29-Nov 2:05 pm
Surface Profile - East Test Fill
Slope = 1.4:1repose = 35.8o
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0Horizontal Offset from Baseline (ft)
880
890
900
910
Elev
atio
n (ft
)
23-Nov 10:00 am23-Nov 4:15 pm28-Nov 9:50 am28-Nov 12:22 pm29-Nov 1:30 pm
Surface Profile - West Test Fill
Settlement Arrays
Installation: Magnetic Extensometers
Challenges– Keep Strings Untangled, Organized– String Strength– Backfill Bridging
0 1 2 3 4Vertical Compression (%)
East Fill
2 1 0
840
850
860
870
880
890
Elevation (ft)
West Fill
Vibrating Wire Piezometers
Purpose: pore pressure
Installation– Direct Burial– Unvented Transducers
Lessons Learned– Measure Elevation– Backfill, Joint Seals– Influence of Weather
Piezometer Readings
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Elapsed Time (days)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Exc
ess
Por
e W
ater
Pre
ssur
e / I
nitia
l Ver
tical
Effe
ctiv
e S
tress
West Fill0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4 East Fill= Periods of Placing Fill
Removing FillFill Height = 23 feet
Fill Height = 9 ftFill Height = 20 feet
Findings
Vibrocompaction reduced settlements ~50%
Excess pore pressures dissipate within a few days
Settlements take place over same time
Staged construction rates
Vibrocompaction not needed
Construction Cost Savings– Less conservative– Better construction bids– ~ 50 times field test cost