emerald st - city of philadelphia: city of philadelphia emerald st... · emerald street (on city...

CIVIC DESIGN REVIEWDate: 11.14.2017

2601-15 Emerald St.

2601-15 Emerald St

2601-15 Emerald St. CONTEXT MAP6 BLOCK RADIUS

1

2

4

3

5

6

7

8

The Site (2601-15 Emerald St)

BVM Roman Catholic Parish

Temple University Hospital

Huntingdon Train Station

Sankofa Freedom Charter School

Henry A. Brown Elementary School

Kensington High School

Pops Playground

FRANKFORD AVE.

6 BLOCK

RADIUS

KENSINGTON AVE.E. LEHIGH AVE.1

6

7

8

3

4 2

5

2601-15 Emerald St. SITE CONTEXTSTREET IMAGES

1

4

2

5

3

12

34

5

E. HUNTINGTON ST. - LOOKING EAST

E. HUNTINGTON ST. - LOOKING WEST

E. HUNTINGTON ST. - LOOKING NORTH

BRADDOCK ST. - LOOKING SOUTH

SITE

EMERALD ST

E. HUNTINGTON ST

BRADDOCK ST

BRADDOCK ST. - LOOKING NORTH

2601-15 Emerald St. SITE CONTEXTZONING / LAND USE

1 2ZONING MAP

SITE SITE

CMX-1NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL MIX-USE-1 RESIDENTIAL - LOWCMX-2NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL MIX-USE-2 RESIDENTIAL - MEDIUM

CMX-2.5NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL MIX-USE-2.5 COMMERCIAL CONSUMERICMXINDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL MIX-USE COMMERCIAL MIXED RESIDENTIALIRMXINDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL MIX-USE INDUSTRIALRM-1RESIDENTIAL MIX-USE-1 CIVIC/INSTITUTION

RSA-5RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED-5 TRANSPORTATIONSP-PO-AACTIVE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE VACANT

LAND USE MAP

2601-15 Emerald St. CIVIL SURVEY-

LOT AAREA = 18932.75SF

18'-1

0 1/2"

PROP

ERTY

LINE

16'-1

3/16

"16

'-8"

16'-8

"16

'-8"

16'-8

"16

'-8"

17'-2

"

9'-0"

4'-0"

12'-0" SIDEWALK

5'-6"WALKZONE

FURN.ZONE

3'-0"BLDG.ZONE

3'-6"

WAL

KZO

NEFU

RN.

ZONE

N32°24'26"W 162.373'(U.S.S.)

N57°

35'34

"E13

5.477

'(U.S

.S.)

S57°

35'34

"W13

5.477

'(U.S

.S.)

S32°24'26"E 162.373'(U.S.S.) 162.000'(P.D.S.)

UNITS 1-24 STORY DUPLEX

2615 EMERALD STREETLOT C

LOT_ 1,532.49 GSFVACANT LOT

2618 BRADDOCK STREETLOT B

LOT_ 1,532.49 GSFVACANT LOT

E HUNTINGTON STREET(ON CITY PLAN - LEGALLY OPEN)CITY NEIGHBORHOOD STREET

(60' WIDE - 13'-34'-13')

PARKINGPARKING

N

BR

AD

DO

CK

STR

EE

T(O

N CI

TY P

LAN

- LEG

ALLY

OPE

N)LO

CAL S

TREE

T(5

0' W

IDE

- 12'-

26'-1

2')

PARK

ING

PARK

ING

EM

ER

ALD

STR

EE

T(O

N CI

TY P

LAN

- LEG

ALLY

OPE

N)CI

TY N

EIGH

BORH

OOD

STRE

ET(5

0' W

IDE

- 12'-

26'-1

2')

PARK

ING

PARK

ING

DRIVE AISLE /EASEMENT

58'-8" BUILDING DIMENSION3'-0 1/2" S.W.

18'-0" PARKING STALL 24'-0" DRIVE AISLE 58'-8" BUILDING DIMENSION

17'-2

"16

'-8"

16'-8

"16

'-8"

16'-8

"16

'-8"

16'-1

3/16

"18

'-10 1

/2"PR

OPER

TY LI

NE

24'-0" PROPOSED CURB CURT

13'-0

" SID

EWAL

K

12'-0" SIDEWALK 79'-8 1/4"3'-0"79'-8 1/4"

5'-6"WALKZONE

FURN.ZONE

3'-0"BLDG.ZONE

3'-6" 2620 BRADDOCK STREETADJACENT 2 STORY

STRUCTURE

2617 EMERALD STREETADJACENT 2 STORY

STRUCTURE

DN

DN ROOFDECK

PROPOSED STREET TREE(TYP)

42" H SETBACKGUARDRAIL

ROOFDECK

42" H GUARDRAIL /PARAPET



±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL

RECESS PORTION@ 1ST FLOOR

UNITS 3-54 STORY TRIPLEX

DN

DN ROOFDECK


ROOFDECK




±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL



DN

DN ROOFDECK


ROOFDECK




±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL



DN

DN ROOFDECK


ROOFDECK




±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL



DN

DN ROOFDECK


ROOFDECK




±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL




DN

DNROOFDECK


ROOFDECK




±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL



5'-0"

DN

DN

ROOFDECK42" H SETBACK

GUARDRAIL

ROOFDECK


42" H PARAPET


±9'-1

1"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL

±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL3'-0"

E.W.

6'-0"

E.W

.



DN

DNROOFDECK


ROOFDECK




±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL



5'-0"


DN

DNROOFDECK


ROOFDECK




±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL



5'-0"


DN

DNROOFDECK


ROOFDECK




±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL



5'-0"


DN

DNROOFDECK


ROOFDECK




±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL


±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL



5'-0"



DN

ROOFDECK


ROOFDECK


42" H PARAPET(TYP)


±9'-1

1"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

±3'-6"WELL

42" H PARAPET(TYP)

±9'-1

0"EX

T. S

TAIR

WEL

L

3'-6"WELL

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL




8' x 18' ADA VANPARKING

STALL

8.5' x 18'PARKING

STALL

8.5' x 18'PARKING

STALL

10

8.5' x 18'PARKING

STALL

9

8.5' x 18'PARKING

STALL

8

7

8.5' x 18'PARKING

STALL

6

8.5' x 18'PARKING

STALL

5

8.5' x 18'PARKING

STALL

4

8.5' x 18'PARKING

STALL

3

8.5' x 18' PARKING STALL

2

1

6'-0"

8'-6"

8'-6"

8'-6"

8'-6"

8'-6"

8'-6"

8'-6"

8'-6"

8'-6"

8'-0"

16'-1

3/16

"16

'-8"

16'-8

"16

'-8"

16'-8

"16

'-8"

16'-8

"16

'-8"

16'-8

"16

'-8"

16'-8

"16

'-8"

18'-0

"

18'-0" 21'-4 1/2" 35'-0"

35'-0"

35'-0" 18'-0"

162'-4 1/2" PROPERTY LINE

18'-0

"17

'-5 11

/16"

18'-0

1/2"

PROPOSED STREET TREE(TYP)

PROPOSEDSTREET TREE(TYP)

PROPOSEDSTREET TREE(TYP)

116'-

7 3/16

" PRO

PERT

Y LIN

E

116'-

7 3/16

"

2601EMERALDSTREETLOT A

40 DWELLING UNITS

18'-1

0 1/2"

81'-2 1/4"81'-2 1/4"

4'-0"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

4'-0"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

4'-0"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

4'-0"

STAI

R7'-

7"ST

AIR

7'-7"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

3'-0"STAIR

3'-0"STAIR

4'-0" HIGH FENCE & GATE50% OPAQUE MAX.

4'-0" HIGH ENTRY GATE50% OPAQUE MAX.

4'-0"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

4'-0"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

4'-0"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

4'-0"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

4'-0"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

4'-0"

STAI

R

3'-0"STAIR

51'-0" BUILDING DIMENSION

PILOT HOUSE(TO CONTAIN STAIRS AND LANDING ONLY)

(90 SF MAX)±4'-4

"P.

H.


42" H GUARDRAIL/PARAPET



±19'-2" PILOT HOUSE

ROOFDECK 42" H GUARDRAIL /

PARAPET

46'-0" 5'-0"

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL

51'-0" BUILDING DIMENSION

PILOT HOUSE(TO CONTAIN STAIRS AND LANDING ONLY)

(90 SF MAX) ±4'-4

"P.

H.


42" H GUARDRAIL/PARAPET



±19'-2" PILOT HOUSE

ROOFDECK

ROOF

DEC

K@

3RD

FLR


42" HGUARDRAIL/PARAPET(TYP ALL SIDES)

46'-0"5'-0"

3'-0"E.W.

6'-6"

EGRE

SS W

ELL

116'-

7 3/16

" BUI

LDIN

G DI

MENS

ION







18'-0"ACCESSORY SHED(NOT TO EXCEED 15'-0" IN HEIGHT)

TO CONTAIN 14 BIKE STALLS

5'-0" (TYP)SETBACK

5'-0" (TYP)SETBACK

1Z.1

1Z.1

2Z.1

3Z.1

8' x 18' VAN ACCESS AISLE

EXISTINGSTREET POLE

EXISTINGSTREET POLE

4'-0"

3'-0"

PROPOSED ADACORNER RAMPW/ DETECTABLEWARNING

EXIST. STREETSIGN

PROPOSED ADACORNER RAMPW/ DETECTABLEWARNING

3'-0"

5'-0"

(TYP

)SE

TBAC

K 42" H PARAPET

5'-0"

(TYP

)SE

TBAC

K

LANDSCAPEDAREA

LANDSCAPED ROOF

8'-0"

5'-0"

24'-0" DRIVE AISLE(OPEN AREA)

TREE 3

ROOF

DEC

K@

3RD

FLR

13'-1

1/4"

TREE 2

TREE 1

24'-0"LANDSCAPED BUFFER

(3) SHRUBS

LANDSCAPEDAREA

LANDSCAPEDAREA

42" HGUARDRAIL/

PARAPET(TYP ALL SIDES)

7'-8"10'-8 1/2" 18'-0"

LANDSCAPEDAREA

EXTENTS OF PARKINGLOT LANDSCAPED AREA

EXTENTS OF PARKINGLOT LANDSCAPED AREA

OPENTO BELOW

OPENTO BELOW

STREETS DEPARTMENT NOTES:

1. WORK TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, APPROVEDDRAWINGS, AND REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STREETS, PHILADELPHIA WATERDEPARTMENT, PHILADELPHIA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND SPECIAL PROVISIONSOF THE PROPOSAL.

2. NEW CURB PER CURB, FOOTWAY AND ROADWAY RESTORATION STANDARD DRAWINGNUMBER SC-0101

3. MINIMUM PEDESTRIAN, BUILDING, AND FURNISHING ZONES PER COMPLETE STREETSPOLICY, CHAPTER 11-900

4. PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF PENNSYLVANIA ACT 287 (1974), AND AS AMENDED,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE PENNSYLVANIA ONE CALL SYSTEM AT 1-800-242-1776,AT LEAST 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION.

- PENNSYLVANIA ONE CALL SYSTEM #2017 250 3269- WARD #31

5. UTILITIES SHOWN ARE TAKEN FROM PUBLIC RECORD.

6. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL, LINE AND GRADE STAKES FOR CURB, PAVING, ETC.WILL BE FURNISHED BY THE 5TH SURVEY DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA BASED ONITEM #4-1040.NOTE: THIS ITEM, ENGINEERING SERVICES, IS A PRE-DETERMINED AMOUNT TO BEDETERMINED BY THE SURVEYOR & REGULATOR AND TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTOR'SBID.

7. PERMITS FOR BOLLARDS, CURB, AND SIDEWALK PAVING WILL BE FURNISHED BY THE 5THHIGHWAY DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.

8. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA SHALL PROVIDE INSPECTION SERVICES FOR PAVING ANDRELATED WORK, TO BE PAID UNDER ITEM #4-1041 AT A COST OF $345 PER DAY. THECONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CONSTRUCTION UNIT OF THE DIVISION OF SURVEYS,DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION AT (215) 686-5539, A MINIMUM OF 2 WEEKS PRIOR TO THE START OFWORK. THIS ITEM, INSPECTION SERVICES, SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTOR'S BID.

9. STREET TREES MUST BE PERMITTED BY THE PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS &RECREATION. CONTACT THE STREET TREE MANAGEMENT DIVISION AT (215) 685-4363.

10. ALL EGRESS/ LIGHT WELLS TO BE CAPPED FLUSH WITH SIDEWALKWITH WALKABLE STEEL GRATE.

11. SIDEWALK SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TAKEN FROM PUBLIC RECORD. MEASUREMENTS ARESET ABOVE PHILADELPHIA DATUM (A.P.D.). ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE EXISTING AND DO NOTNECESSARY REFLECT PROPOSED CONDITIONS.

12. STREET LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS ARE NOT FINAL. THE STREETS DEPARTMENT STREETLIGHTING ENGINEER WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF THE STREET LIGHT POLESDURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT THE STREET LIGHTING ENGINEER AT (215) 686 5517 TOCOORDINATE STREET LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS.

13. FOR PROJECTS ON STATE ROUTES, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE RECEIPT OF APERMIT FROM EITHER THE PHILADELPHIA STREETS DEPARTMENT, OR THE PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (PennDOT) DOESN NOT IMPLY A PERMIT FROM THE OTHER.ALL PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.

14. EGRESS WELLS IN SIDEWALK SHALL BE CAPPED FLUSH W/ FINISHED SIDEWALK SURFACEW/ WALKABLE STEEL BAR GRATING

PROJECT SUMMARY: 2601 EMERALD STREET (LOT 1)ZONING: RM-1ABUTTING ZONING DISTRICT: RSA-5ZONING DISTRICT ACROSS STREET: RSA-5, SP-POA-ALOT AREA: 18932.75USE: PROPOSED 40 DWELLING UNITS

ALLOWED PROPOSEDDWELLING UNITS 40.4 40

DIMENSIONAL STANDARDSREQUIRED / ALLOWED PROPOSED

OPEN AREA 3786.55 SF (20%) 5370.75 SF (28.4%)OCCUPIED AREA 15146.2 SF (80%) 13562 SF (71.6%)FRONT YARD SETBACK 0' 0'SIDE YARD 5' IF USED 0' NOT USEDREAR YARD NA NAHEIGHT 38' MAX 38' MAXGFA NA 53,582 GSF

TYPICAL ENCROACHMENTS INTO RIGHT OF WAYS:EMERALD STREET & BRADDOCK STREET N HUNTINGTON STREETPEDESTRIAN ZONE 5'-6" PEDESTRIAN ZONE 9'-0"FURNISHING ZONE 3'-6" FURNISHING ZONE 4'-0"BUILDING ZONE 3'-0' BUILDING ZONE 0'-0"

STAIR ENCROACHMENT - 3'-0"EGRESS WELLS (TYP. THROUGHOUT:) 3'-0"

EGRESS WELLS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A WALKABLE STEEL GRATE FLUSH WITH THESIDEWALK AND ACCESSIBLE.

ZONING NOTES:

1. PILOT HOUSES ARE TO CONTAIN STAIRS AND LANDINGS ONLY.

2. PROPOSED ROOF DECKS ARE TO BE SETBACK MIN. 5'-0" FROM RIGHT OF WAYS.

3. GUARD RAILS/TYPICAL PARAPETS ARE 42" AFF

4. 6' TALL FENCE PROPOSED AT REAR AND SIDE YARDS WHERE APPLICABLE

PROJECT SUMMARY: 2601 EMERALD STREET (LOTS 2 & 3) (IDENTICAL)ZONING: RSA-5ABUTTING ZONING DISTRICT: RSA-5, RM-1ZONING DISTRICT ACROSS STREET: RSA-5LOT AREA: 1532.49 GSFUSE: PROPOSED VACANT LOT

REQUIRED PROPOSEDAUTO PARKING 0 SP (0) ADA 11 SP (1) ADABIKE PARKING 14 SP 14 SP

LANDSCAPING SUMMARYPARKING LOT OPEN TO SKY: 5044.9 SF.

REQUIRED PROPOSEDLANDSCAPED AREA 504.49 SF(10%) 514.24 SF(10.2%)REQUIRED PLANTING (1 TREE PER 300 SF) 1.7 TREES 2 TREESSTREET TREES 12 TOTAL 19 TOTAL

LANDSCAPE NOTES:

1. LANDSCAPING SHALL COMPLY WITH ON-SITE LANDSCAPE AND TREE REQUIREMENTSOF THE ZONING CODE, SECTION 705.1.

2. ALL PLANTS, TREES, SHRUBS AND GRASS SHALL BE ON THE COMMISSION'SAPPROVED PLANTINGS LIST.

3. TREES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CALIPER OF 2.0 INCHES.

4. SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT AN INTERVAL SUCH THAT THERE ARE NOT LESS THANTHREE (3) SHRUBS PER 25' OF LINEAR PARKING LOT FRONTAGE ALONG PUBLIC STREET AND HAVE A MATURE HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN 2'-0".

5. PROJECTS WITH PARKING ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OR PUBLICSTREETS SHALL HAVE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER OR ORNAMENTAL FENCE/WALL.

6. STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN PROJECT INCLUDES 3 LOTS AND/OR A LOTAREA OF 5,000 SF , USED FOR MORE THAN A 1,2 FAMILY DWELLING.

7. STREET TREES TO BE PLANTED AT 1 PER 35' OF BUILDING FRONTAGE. SPACINGBETWEEN TREES SHOULD BE AT LEAST 15' APART.

Z.0

ZONING SITE PLAN

Z.01 ZONING PLAN

1/4" = 1'-0"

harmandeutsch631 N. 12th Street, 1st FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19123

(P): 267.324.3601(F): 267.324.3603(E): [email protected] www.hdarchitecture.com

HARMAN DEUTSCH HEREBY RESERVES IT'S COMMONLAW COPYRIGHT AND ALL PROPERTY RIGHTS INTHESE DRAWINGS, IDEAS AND DESIGNS. THEINFORMATION ON THIS SHEET IS NOT TO BEREPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR COPIED IN ANY MANNER.THE INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET IS NOT TO BEASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THEEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF HARMANDEUTSCH.

# DATE ISSUE / REVISION

© 2017 HARMAN DEUTSCH ARCHITECTURE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

DRAWINGS CHECKED BY:

DRAWING TITLE:

DRAWING NUMBER:

DRAWINGS PREPARED BY:

40 DWELLING UNITS

2601-15 EMERALD STREET(LOTS 1, 2, 3)

PHILADELPHIA, PA

PROJECT TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

CONSULTANTS:

SEAL:

ARCHITECTURE

RS

ZONING SUBMISSION09.11.2017

BL

ZON

ING

ON

LY

ZONING REVISION09.19.2017

1

1

1

B

2601-15 Emerald St. ZONING PLAN-

ZONING CHARTBASE DISTRICT: RM-1ABUTTING DISTRICT: RSA-5DISTRICT ACROSS STREET: RSA-5, SP-POA-ALOT AREA: 18,932.75 SFUSE: Proposed 40 Dwelling Units (40.4 allowed)

DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS: REQUIRED / ALLOWED PROPOSEDOPEN AREA: 3,786.55 SF (20%) 5,370.75 SF (28.4%)OCCUPIED AREA: 15,146.2 SF (80%) 1,3562 SF (71.6%)FRONT YARD SETBACK: 0’-0” 0’-0” SIDE YARD: 5’ IF USED 0’-0”REAR YARD: N/A N/AHEIGHT: 38’-0” MAX 38’-0” MAXGFA: N/A 53,582 GSF

PARKING: REQUIRED PROPOSEDAUTO PARKING: 0 STALLS / (0) ADA 9 STALLS + (1) VAN BIKE PARKING: 14 STALLS 14 STALLS

LANDSCAPING:PARKING LOT OPEN TO SKY: 4961.33 SF REQUIRED PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREA 496.13 (10%) 505.91 (10.2%)REQUIRED PLANTING 1.7 TREES 3 TREESSTREET TREES 12 TOTAL 19 TOTAL

RIGHT-OF-WAY COMPONENTS:EMERALD ST. & BRADDOCK ST. N. HUNTINGTON ST.PEDESTRIAN ZONE: 5’-6” PEDESTRIAN ZONE 9’-0”FURNISHING ZONE: 3’-6” FURNISHING ZONE 4’-0”BUILDING ZONE: 3’-0’ BUILDING ZONE 0’-0”

RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENTS (TYP.):STAIR ENCROACHMENT: 3’-0”EGRESS WELLS: 3’-0”

2601-15 Emerald St. SITE PLANGROUND FLOOR PLAN

BLDG A BLDG H

BLDG B BLDG I

BLDG C BLDG J

BLDG D BLDG K

BLDG E BLDG L

BLDG F BLDG M

BLDG G BLDG N

2601-15 Emerald St. RECESSED ENTRY DETAIL-

DETAILED PLAN DETAILED SECTION

UN

IT 1

UN

IT 1

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 3

UN

IT 3

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 3

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 3

TRASHROOM

TRASHROOM

TRASHROOM

2601-15 Emerald St. TRIPLEX FLOOR PLANSBLDG: B-F

BLDG: I-M (MIRRORED)

BASEMENT 1ST FL 2ND FL 3RD FL 4TH FL ROOF

TRASHROOM

TRASHROOM

TRASHROOM

UN

IT 1

UN

IT 1

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 3

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 3

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 3

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 3

2601-15 Emerald St. TRIPLEX FLOOR PLANSBLDG: G

BLDG: N (MIRRORED)


COND

COND

UN

IT 1

UN

IT 1

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 2

UN

IT 1

3 2.5

TRASHROOM

BALCONYBELOW

TRASHROOM

2601-15 Emerald St. DUPLEX FLOOR PLANSBLDG: A

BLDG: H (MIRRORED)


2601-15 Emerald St. ELEVATIONEMERALD STREET

E. HUNTINGTON STREET

2617 EMERALDSTREET

LOT-C2615 EMERALD

STREET

BLDG A BLDG B BLDG C BLDG D BLDG E BLDG F BLDG G

2601-15 Emerald St. ELEVATIONEMERALD STREET REAR

E. HUNTINGTONSTREET

BLDG G BLDG F BLDG E BLDG D BLDG C BLDG B BLDG A 2617 EMERALDSTREET

LOT-C2615 EMERALD

STREET

2601-15 Emerald St. ELEVATIONE. HUNTINGTON STREET

BRADDOCKSTREET

EMERALD STREET

BLDG G PEDASTRIANSIDEWALK

PARKINGAREA

DRIVEAISLE

BLDG N

2601-15 Emerald St. ELEVATIONBRADDOCK STREET

2620BRADDOCK

STREET

LOT-B2618

BRADDOCKSTREET

E. HUNTINGTONSTREET

BLDG N BLDG M BLDG L BLDG K BLDG J BLDG I BLDG H

2601-15 Emerald St. ELEVATIONBRADDOCK STREET REAR

E. HUNTINGTONSTREET

BLDG H BLDG I BLDG J BLDG K BLDG L BLDG M BLDG N2620BRADDOCK

STREET

LOT-B2618

BRADDOCKSTREET

2601-15 Emerald St. Front Elevation FacadeMaterial

BUILT-IN PLANTERWALL MOUNTED LED DOWN LIGHT

METAL REVEAL

METAL PANELATAS INTERNATIONALCOLOR: CHARCOAL GREY

JELD-WENPREMIUM VINYL WINDOWSCOLOR: BLACK

BRICKGLEN-GERY IRONSPOT SERIESCOLOR: OYSTER GREY(SIS56)

1

2

4

3

5

6

2601-15 Emerald St. Rear Elevation FacadeMaterial

42” HIGH, BLACK POWER COATED METAL GUARDRAIL

FULL LITE DOOR

FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDINGJAMES HARDIE4” EXPOSED BEADDED SMOOTHCOLOR: COBBLE STONE

BRICKGLEN-GERY IRONSPOT SERIESCOLORE: OYSTER GREY(SIS56)

FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDINGJAMES HARDIE4” EXPOSED BEADDED SMOOTHCOLOR: IRON GREY

FIBERCEMENT LAP SIDINGJAMES HARDIE7” EXPOSED BEADDED SMOOTHCOLOR: COBBLE STONE

RECESSEDEGRESS WELL

BEYOND

RECESSEDEGRESS WELL

BEYOND

1

2

4

3

5

6

EMERALD STREET(ON CITY PLAN - LEGALLY OPEN)CITY NEIGHBORHOOD STREET

(50' WIDE - 12'-26'-12')

BRADDOCK STREET(ON CITY PLAN - LEGALLY OPEN)

LOCAL STREET(50' WIDE - 12'-26'-12')

3'-6"

PARA

PET

5'-0"SETBACK

3'-6"

PARA

PET

RECESS PORTION@ 1ST FLOOR RECESS PORTION

@ 1ST FLOOR

FIRST FLOOR: 25.67'

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR

FIRST FLOOR: 23.8'

CELLARCELLAR

±38'-

0 1/8"

(38'-

0" M

AX)

BUILD

ING

HEIG

HT

58'-8 1/16"BUILDING DIMENSION

3'-0 1/2"SIDEWALK

18'-0" PARKING STALL 24'-0" DRIVE AISLE / EASEMENT 58'-8" BUILDING DIMENSION

PROP

ERTY

LINE

PROP

ERTY

LINE

PROP

ERTY

LINE

PROP

ERTY

LINE

2600BLOCK OF

BRADDOCK ST.2-STORY

1941E. HUNTINGTON ST.

VACANT LOT

2620 EMERALD ST.2-STORY, BEYOND

3'-6"

PARA

PET

ROOF DECK

EXTERIOR STAIRWELLTO ROOF DECK

5'-0"SETBACK


3'-6"

PARA

PET

ROOF DECK



FIRST FLOOR: 25.67'

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR

±38'-

0" (3

8'-0"

MAX

)BU

ILDIN

G HE

IGHT

EXTERIOR STAIRWELL TOROOF DECK


FRONT YARD

2000-BLOCK OFE. HUNTINGTON ST.

3-STORYE HUNTINGTON STREET

(ON CITY PLAN - LEGALLY OPEN)CITY NEIGHBORHOOD STREET

(60' WIDE - 13'-34'-13')

PROP

ERTY

LINE

PROP

ERTY

LINE

2620BRADDOCK

ST.2-STORY

PROP

ERTY

LINE

2622BRADDOCK

ST.2-STORY

PROP

ERTY

LINE

'UNIT C'

'UNIT C'

'UNIT C'

'UNIT B'

'UNIT B'

'UNIT B'

'UNIT A'

'UNIT A'

'UNIT C'

'UNIT C'

'UNIT C'

'UNIT B'

'UNIT B'

'UNIT B'

'UNIT A'

'UNIT A'

GRADEFIRST FLOOR: 25.67'

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR

CELLAR

PARAPET

ROOF DECK








±10'-

0" P

ILOTH

OUSE

(10'-

0" M

AX)

±4'-4"PILOT HOUSE

2601 EMERALD STREET (LOT A)40 DWELLING UNITS

2618 BRADDOCK ST.'LOT B'

VACANT LOT

3'-6"

PARA

PET

3'-6"

PARA

PET

3'-6"

PARA

PET

±38'-

0" (3

8'-0"

MAX

)BU

ILDIN

G HE

IGHT

13'-0"SIDEWALK

12'-0"SIDEWALK

PILOT HOUSE BEYONDPILOT HOUSE BEYOND

±20'-

8"±30'-

0"

SITE SECTIONS-

-1 SITE SECTION LOOKING NORTH

3/32" = 1'-0"

2603-15 EMERALD STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA

# DATE ISSUE / REVISION

DEED / FEASIBILITY05.19.2017

2603

-15

EMER

ALD

STR

EET

© 2017 HARMAN DEUTSCH ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

DEED / FEASIBILITY07.12.20172

1

3 SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS08.10.2017

4 SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS09.1.2017

5 PRELIM. RCO PRESENTATION10.12.17

-2 SITE SECTION THROUGH BRADDOCK ST. LOOKING WEST

3/32" = 1'-0"

2601-15 Emerald St. Site Section-

SECTION A

SECTION B

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

N

E. HUNTINGTON ST.

BRAD

DOCK

STR

EET

EMER

ALD

STRE

ET

AA

B

B

2601-15 Emerald St. Sustainability-

Civic Design Review, Philadelphia Sustainability Questionnaire

Categories Benchmark

Meets or Exceeds the Benchmark (yes or no)?

If yes, please describe how or reference the applicable document in the CDR

submission.

Location and Transportation

Access to Quality Transit

Locate a functional entry of the project within a ¼-mile (1312-feet) walking distance of existing or planned bus, streetcar,or rideshare stops, bus rapid transit stops, light or heavy rail stations.

Reduced Parking Footprint

All new parking areas to be located in the rear yard of the property or under the building, and unenclosed or uncovered parking areas are 40% or less of the site area.

Green Vehicles

Designate 5% of all parking spaces used by the project as preferred parking for green vehicles or car share vehicles. Clearly identify and enforce for sole use by car share or green vehicles, which include plug-in electric vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles.

Bike Share StationIncorporate a bike share station in coordination with and conformance to the standards of Philadelphia Bike Share.

Sustainable Sites

Pervious Site Surfaces

Provides vegetated and/or pervious open space that is 30% or greater of the site's Open Area, as de�ned by the zoning code. Vegetated and/or green roofs can be included in this calculation.

Rainwater Management

Conform to the stormwater requirements of the Philadelphia Water Department(PWD) and either: A)Develop a green street and donate it to PWD, designed and constructed in accordance with the PWD Green Streets Design Manual, OR B) Manage additional runo� from adjacent streets on the development site, designed and constructed in accordance with speci�cations the PWD Stormwater Management Regulations

Heat Island Reduction (excluding roofs)

Reduce the heat island e�ect through either of the following strategies for 50% or more of all on-site hardscapes: A) Hardscapes that have a high re�ectance, an SRI>29. B) Shading by trees, structures, or solar panels.

Yes. - Bus 39 @ corner of Huntington St. and Emerald St. - MFL @ Huntington Station- Bus 5 @ corner of Frankford and E. Lehigh

Yes, additional runnoff from adjacent streets will be managed on-site in accordance with the PWD stormwater management regulations.

Yes, parking is in rear yard, uncovered.Lot = 18933sfParking + drive aisle = 4563sf = 24.1%

Yes, space 1 = EV11 x (.05) = .55 = 1 EV Space

No, there are no bike share station on this site.

No, Site = 18933sfLandscape = 5097sf = 26.9%

No. - Aisle open on south side - Braddock bldg may shade in early AM / late PM

(yes or no)? Categories Benchmark

Meets or Exceeds the Benchmark (yes or no)?

If yes, please describe how or reference the applicable document in the CDR

submission.

Water E�ciency

Outdoor Water Use

Maintain on-site vegetation without irrigation. OR, reduce the watering requirements to at least 50% from the calculated baseline for the site's peak watering month.

Energy and Atmosphere

Energy Commissioning

Acquire a separate, independent commissioning service to insure that the energy related systems are installed, calibrated, and perform as intended.

Energy Performance

The project will reduce energy consumption by: Achieving 10% energy saving or more from an established baseline using ASHRAE standard 90.1-2010, OR by conforming to ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for Commercial Buildings.

On-Site Renewable Energy

Produce renewable energy on-site that will provide at least 3% of the project's anticipated energy usage.

Innovation

InnovationAny other sustainable measures that could positively impact the public realm.

Civic Design Review, Philadelphia Sustainability Questionnaire

Yes, on-site vegetation will be maintained without irrigation.

No, independent commioning services will not be contracted.

Yes, the design team will evaluate how to reduce energy consumption to be above ASHRAE standards.

No, renewable energy will not be produced on-site.

No applicable.

2601-15 Emerald St. RENDER VIEW 1 EMERALD ST AND E. HUNTINGTON ST

2601-15 Emerald St. RENDER VIEW 2 BRADDOCK ST

2601-15 Emerald St. RENDER VIEW 3E. HUNTINGTON ST

2601-15 Emerald St. COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST-

COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission

1

INSTRUCTIONS This Checklist is an implementation tool of the Philadelphia Complete Streets Handbook (the “Handbook”) and enables City engineers and planners to review projects for their compliance with the Handbook’s policies. The handbook provides design guidance and does not supersede or replace language, standards or policies established in the City Code, City Plan, or Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

The Philadelphia City Planning Commission receives this Checklist as a function of its Civic Design Review (CDR) process. This checklist is used to document how project applicants considered and accommodated the needs of all users of city streets and sidewalks during the planning and/or design of projects affecting public rights‐of‐way. Departmental reviewers will use this checklist to confirm that submitted designs incorporate complete streets considerations (see §11‐901 of The Philadelphia Code). Applicants for projects that require Civic Design Review shall complete this checklist and attach it to plans submitted to the Philadelphia City Planning Commission for review, along with an electronic version.

The Handbook and the checklist can be accessed at http://www.phila.gov/CityPlanning/projectreviews/Pages/CivicDesignReview.aspx

PRELIMINARY PCPC REVIEW AND COMMENT:

DATE

FINAL STREETS DEPT REVIEW AND COMMENT:

DATE


2

INSTRUCTIONS (continued) APPLICANTS SHOULD MAKE SURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:

� This checklist is designed to be filled out electronically in Microsoft Word format. Please submit the Word version of the checklist. Text fields will expand automatically as you type.

� All plans submitted for review must clearly dimension the widths of the Furnishing, Walking, and Building Zones (as defined in Section 1 of the Handbook). “High Priority” Complete Streets treatments (identified in Table 1 and subsequent sections of the Handbook) should be identified and dimensioned on plans.

� All plans submitted for review must clearly identify and site all street furniture, including but not limited to bus shelters, street signs and hydrants.

� Any project that calls for the development and installation of medians, bio‐swales and other such features in the right‐of‐way may require a maintenance agreement with the Streets Department.

� ADA curb‐ramp designs must be submitted to Streets Department for review

� Any project that significantly changes the curb line may require a City Plan Action. The City Plan Action Application is available at http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/survey‐and‐design‐bureau/city‐plans‐unit . An application to the Streets Department for a City Plan Action is required when a project plan proposes the:

o Placing of a new street; o Removal of an existing street; o Changes to roadway grades, curb lines, or widths; or o Placing or striking a city utility right‐of‐way.

Complete Streets Review Submission Requirement*:

EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale

o FULLY DIMENSIONED

o CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES

o TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING

o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS

o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS

PROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale

o FULLY DIMENSIONED, INCLUDING DELINEATION OF WALKING, FURNISHING, AND BUILDING ZONES AND PINCH POINTS

o PROPOSED CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES

o PROPOSED TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING

o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS

o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS

*APPLICANTS PLEASE NOTE: ONLY FULL‐SIZE, READABLE SITE PLANS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ADDITIONAL PLANS MAY BE REQUIRED AND WILL BE REQUESTED IF NECESSARY



3

GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1. PROJECT NAME

2601‐15 Emerald St.

10.24.2017

2. APPLICANT NAME

Rustin Ohler [Harman Deutsch Arch]

3. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION

Harman Deutsch Architecture 0 631 N. 12th st. Phila pa

4. PROJECT AREA: list precise street limits and scope

18,932.75 sf

5. OWNER NAME

Streamline Group

6. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION

2301 Washington Ave

7. APPLICANT NAME

Rustin Ohler [Harman Deutsch Arch]

8. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION

Harman Deutsch Architecture 0 631 N. 12th st. Phila pa

9. STREETS: List the streets associated with the project. Complete Streets Types can be found at www.phila.gov/map under the “Complete Street Types” field. Complete Streets Types are also identified in Section 3 of the Handbook.

STREET FROM TO COMPLETE STREET TYPE

Emerald St. Huntington St Harold St City Neighborhood St.

Braddock St. Huntington St E. Lehigh Ave. Local St.

E. Huntingdon St. Emerald St Braddock St City Neighborhood St.

11. Does the Existing Conditions site survey clearly identify the following existing conditions with dimensions?

a. Parking and loading regulations in curb lanes adjacent to the site YES NO

b. Street Furniture such as bus shelters, honor boxes, etc. YES NO N/A

c. Street Direction YES NO

d. Curb Cuts YES NO N/A

e. Utilities, including tree grates, vault covers, manholes, junction boxes, signs, lights, poles, etc.

YES NO N/A

f. Building Extensions into the sidewalk, such as stairs and stoops YES NO N/A

APPLICANT: General Project Information

Additional Explanation / Comments:


4

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: General Project Information

Reviewer Comments:



5

PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.3) 12. SIDEWALK: list Sidewalk widths for each street frontage. Required Sidewalk widths are listed in Section 4.3 of the

Handbook. STREET FRONTAGE TYPICAL SIDEWALK WIDTH

(BUILDING LINE TO CURB) Required / Existing / Proposed

CITY PLAN SIDEWALK WIDTH Existing / Proposed

Emerald St. 12 / 26 / 12 12 / 12

E. Huntington St 13 / 34 / 13 13 / 13

Braddock St. 12 / 26 / 12 12 / 12

/ / /

13. WALKING ZONE: list Walking Zone widths for each street frontage. The Walking Zone is defined in Section 4.3 of the Handbook, including required widths.

STREET FRONTAGE WALKING ZONERequired / Existing / Proposed

Emerald St. 6 / 12 / 6

E. Huntington St. 6 / 12 / 6

Braddock St. 5 / 12 / 6

/ /

14. VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS: list Vehicular Intrusions into the sidewalk. Examples include but are not limited to; driveways, lay‐by lanes, etc. Driveways and lay‐by lanes are addressed in sections 4.8.1 and 4.6.3, respectively, of the Handbook.

EXISTING VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT

Depressed curb 125.66’ Emerald St

Depressed curb 41.81’ Braddock St

Depressed curb 58.07’ Braddock St

Depressed curb 16.85’ Braddock St.

PROPOSED VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT

Curb cut 24’ Huntington St.

0’ Emerald St.

0’ Braddock St.


6

PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (continued) DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

15. When considering the overall design, does it create or enhance a pedestrian environment that provides safe and comfortable access for all pedestrians at all times of the day?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Pedestrian Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Pedestrian Component

Reviewer Comments:



7

BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.4) 16. BUILDING ZONE: list the MAXIMUM, existing and proposed Building Zone width on each street frontage. The Building

Zone is defined as the area of the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the building face, wall, or fence marking the property line, or a lawn in lower density residential neighborhoods. The Building Zone is further defined in section 4.4.1 of the Handbook.

STREET FRONTAGE MAXIMUM BUILDING ZONE WIDTHExisting / Proposed

Emerald St. 0 / 3’‐0”

Huntington St. 0 / 3’‐0”

/

/

17. FURNISHING ZONE: list the MINIMUM, recommended, existing, and proposed Furnishing Zone widths on each street frontage. The Furnishing Zone is further defined in section 4.4.2 of the Handbook.

STREET FRONTAGE MINIMUM FURNISHING ZONE WIDTHRecommended / Existing / Proposed

Emerald St. 4’‐0” / 3’‐6” / 3’‐6”

Huntington St. 4’‐0” / 3’‐6” / 3’‐6”

Braddock St. 4’‐0” / 3’‐6” / 4’‐0”

/ /

18. Identify proposed “high priority” building and furnishing zone design treatments that are incorporated into the design plan, where width permits (see Handbook Table 1). Are the following treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

Bicycle Parking YES NO N/A YES NO Lighting YES NO N/A YES NO Benches YES NO N/A YES NO Street Trees YES NO N/A YES NO Street Furniture YES NO N/A YES NO

19. Does the design avoid tripping hazards? YES NO N/A YES NO

20. Does the design avoid pinch points? Pinch points are locations where the Walking Zone width is less than the required width identified in item 13, or requires an exception

YES NO N/A YES NO


8

BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (continued)

APPLICANT: Building & Furnishing Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Building & Furnishing Component

Reviewer Comments:

21. Do street trees and/or plants comply with street installation requirements (see sections 4.4.7 & 4.4.8)

YES NO N/A YES NO

22. Does the design maintain adequate visibility for all roadway users at intersections?

YES NO N/A YES NO



9

BICYCLE COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.5) 23. List elements of the project that incorporate recommendations of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, located online at

http://phila2035.org/wp‐content/uploads/2012/06/bikePedfinal2.pdf

24. List the existing and proposed number of bicycle parking spaces, on‐ and off‐street. Bicycle parking requirements are provided in The Philadelphia Code, Section 14‐804.

BUILDING / ADDRESS REQUIRED SPACES

ON‐STREETExisting / Proposed

ON SIDEWALK Existing / Proposed

OFF‐STREETExisting / Proposed

Emerald St. 14 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 14

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

25. Identify proposed “high priority” bicycle design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that are incorporated into the design plan, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” elements identified and dimensioned on the plan?


Conventional Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO Buffered Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO Bicycle‐Friendly Street YES NO N/A YES NO

26. Does the design provide bicycle connections to local bicycle, trail, and transit networks?

YES NO N/A YES NO

27. Does the design provide convenient bicycle connections to residences, work places, and other destinations?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Bicycle Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Bicycle Component

Reviewer Comments:


10

CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.6) DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

28. Does the design limit conflict among transportation modes along the curb?

YES NO YES NO

29. Does the design connect transit stops to the surrounding pedestrian network and destinations?

YES NO N/A YES NO

30. Does the design provide a buffer between the roadway and pedestrian traffic?

YES NO N/A YES NO

31. How does the proposed plan affect the accessibility, visibility, connectivity, and/or attractiveness of public transit?

YES NO

APPLICANT: Curbside Management Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Curbside Management Component

Reviewer Comments:



11

VEHICLE / CARTWAY COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.7) 32. If lane changes are proposed, , identify existing and proposed lane widths and the design speed for each street

frontage; If not, go to question No. 35 STREET FROM TO LANE WIDTHS

Existing / Proposed DESIGN SPEED

/

/

/

/


33. What is the maximum AASHTO design vehicle being accommodated by the design?

P YES NO

34. Will the project affect a historically certified street? An inventory of historic streets(1) is maintained by the Philadelphia Historical Commission.

YES NO YES NO

35. Will the public right‐of‐way be used for loading and unloading activities?

YES NO YES NO

36. Does the design maintain emergency vehicle access? YES NO YES NO

37. Where new streets are being developed, does the design connect and extend the street grid?

YES NO N/A YES NO

38. Does the design support multiple alternative routes to and from destinations as well as within the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

39. Overall, does the design balance vehicle mobility with the mobility and access of all other roadway users?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Vehicle / Cartway Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Vehicle / Cartway Component

Reviewer Comments:

(1) http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/images/uploads/documents/Historical_Street_Paving.pdf


12

URBAN DESIGN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.8) DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

40. Does the design incorporate windows, storefronts, and other active uses facing the street?

YES NO N/A YES NO

41. Does the design provide driveway access that safely manages pedestrian / bicycle conflicts with vehicles (see Section 4.8.1)?

YES NO N/A YES NO

42. Does the design provide direct, safe, and accessible connections between transit stops/stations and building access points and destinations within the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Urban Design Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Urban Design Component

Reviewer Comments:



13

INTERSECTIONS & CROSSINGS COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.9) 43. If signal cycle changes are proposed, please identify Existing and Proposed Signal Cycle lengths; if not, go to question

No. 48. SIGNAL LOCATION EXISTING

CYCLE LENGTH PROPOSEDCYCLE LENGTH


44. Does the design minimize the signal cycle length to reduce pedestrian wait time?

YES NO N/A YES NO

45. Does the design provide adequate clearance time for pedestrians to cross streets?

YES NO N/A YES NO

46. Does the design minimize pedestrian crossing distances by narrowing streets or travel lanes, extending curbs, reducing curb radii, or using medians or refuge islands to break up long crossings?

If yes, City Plan Action may be required.

YES NO N/A YES NO

47. Identify “High Priority” intersection and crossing design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that will be incorporated into the design, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” design treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

YES NO

Marked Crosswalks YES NO N/A YES NO Pedestrian Refuge Islands YES NO N/A YES NO Signal Timing and Operation YES NO N/A YES NO Bike Boxes YES NO N/A YES NO

48. Does the design reduce vehicle speeds and increase visibility for all modes at intersections?

YES NO N/A YES NO

49. Overall, do intersection designs limit conflicts between all modes and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Intersections & Crossings Component


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Intersections & Crossings Component

Reviewer Comments:


14

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

APPLICANT


DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW

Additional Reviewer Comments:

emerald st - city of philadelphia: city of philadelphia emerald st... · emerald street (on city...

Documents