employed physician engagement 2014
DESCRIPTION
Changing employed physician culture can help build market shareTRANSCRIPT
Building Market Share
through Employed
Physician Engagement
SHSMD
San Diego 2014
Ed Henegar, D.O.VP Medical Affairs at OMC,Interim President of Gainesville Community Hospital
Adrian R. ByrnePresident, Lund Byrne Associates
What we will cover
OMC Description and Market overview
OMC medical staff
OMC challenges and strategies
EPC creation, culture and expectations
EPC evolution
Goal of 4 days to diagnosis and implications
Initial survey EPC reactions
Development of new processes
Practice style implications
Implementation challenges
“Eureka” moments
Follow up referral survey
Moving to self governance
Q&A
Ozarks Medical Center
(OMC) in context!
OMC is a 114-bed, not-for-profit
medical referral center
OMC employs approximately
1,300 people
67 local and rural physicians
One dominant and organized PCP
group
Others scattered, mostly non aligned
OMC employs 40 + physicians
Location
The primary service area
Service area
The County market +/- 89,000
Primary Service area is an 11-county area in south central Missouri and north central Arkansas that has a population of 160,000.
Average IP market share in 2008 = 46.5%
Hospital was losing basic cases to Springfield, MO and to Mountain Home, AR
Many lacked confidence in OMC specialists and ease of access to care
OMC strategy
Strategy:
Stop being seen as a “band-aid” station
Keep appropriate care local
Build capacity
Expand ER
Aggressively import and employ physicians
Supporting Physician Strategy:
Maintain quality
Protect and grow market share by recruiting more specialists in need areas
Create attractive working environment
Reduce leakage by owning more rural PCP practices
Improve internal referral processes
Recruitment
Significant success with recruitment:
Orthopedics
Cardiology
Oncology
General Surgery
Hospitalists
Family practice
Why Physicians sign on
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
Strongly Disagree -1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Stongly Agree - 10
Expectation of Cultural Fit as Determining Factor for Physician Employment
Expectations and reality
We discovered
The recruited and employed physicians were busy and productive but operated as though they were in private practice
Rapidly accepted the independent practice culture
Using W/rvu productivity for pay incentives was working to build practice volume but did not always support hospital goals
Practice staff worked for the physicians and not for the hospital
Patient experience was at the whim of the physicians
True or False?
Employed Physicians can be a solution
to developing new Hospital business?
Employed physicians need to be a part of theteam and to do that they must be accepted aspart of the whole team!
The traditional and separate cultures ofPhysician and Hospital must be merged.
Why is “culture” important?
Culture is an expression of:
The driving values of the organization
How people work, how the priorities are set and how they are reinforced
How success is measured
How people interact within the organization
AND
“the way things are done around here”
How cultures can develop
What can define the behaviors in a desired culture
Force of character of an individual
A focus on unifying goals
Leading by example
Building the company lore on getting there
Articulating the acceptable processes
Active support of protocols and standards of care
Communications – who/what/when/how
Being prepared to intercept and correct “undesirable” actions
Culture as a competitive
advantage
We recognized that:
Culture can create competitive
differentiation
A good culture is hard to duplicate
Also
If there is a fit, the new people will easily
adapt to the culture
People will become loyal to a culture,
not to strategies
Culture drives and confirms
the BRAND
Richard Branson: Quote
“Brands exist as a means of communicating
what to expect from a product or service.
The Virgin brand tells you that using this
credit card is rather like using this airline,
which, in turn, is rather like using this health
club, staying in our hotels, and paying into
this pension fund.
It is a guarantee you'll be treated well, get
a high-quality product and get more out of
your purchase than you expected.”
At OMC was there more
than one culture?
YES !
Hospital Culture
Medical Staff Culture
Employed Physician Culture
Independent Physician Culture
Community Culture
Do they co exist?
Should they co exist?
Can you articulate your
culture
Defined as (E.G.) Supported by
Rate as important in
your culture
(1 = low to 10)
Physician friendly?
Quality oriented?
Patient focused
Collegial
Profit motivated
Area leader in
services
What do physicians want?
Not want?
19
• Respect
• Information
• Input on decisions
• Things-that-work
• Incentives
• Presence
• Freedom
• Inefficiency
• Time wasters
• “Small-mindedness”
• Bureaucracy
• No toleration for “fools”
• Slow decision making
Want Not-Want
Setting the framework for
culture change
Clarity of Vision:
The hospital needs to present physicians
with a clear plan for its future in which
physician participation is a core element.
This is a compelling plan that resonates
with the new realities around the three
basic needs of many physicians
respect,
clinical autonomy and
income.
Setting the framework for
culture change
Physician leadership:
Respected physicians with demonstrated competence as leaders and managers to play a prominent role in the employment strategy, process improvement and ongoing culture.
Branding and marketing:
Access to patients is important tophysicians and the hospital. The hospital’sbranding strategy and marketing supportto be seen as a differentiator in employingphysicians.
Cultural transformation
Current
Culture
2
2
Desired Culture
Time and Effort
We are here
Gap
How do we close the gap?
Elements of cultural
transformation
Path:
Operational management and
process improvement
2
3
People:
New leadership
- Change
management
Plan:
Strategy -
development and
execution
Setting the Vision
Mobilizing Commitment
Sustaining Improvement
Creating the Need
Monitoring Progress
Opening people’s minds to change
2
4
Stating the “good” that will result
Bringing people along
Eliminating slippage
Confirming delivery of the “good”
Supported by a foundation of
leadership and reinforcing agreed processes
Change as a process
“Employed Physician Council”
10 employed physicians who are respected and interested in making a difference
Provided:
Information about changes to practice nationwide
Site visit to Geisinger and to a central scheduling program
Created sub committee to review comp. plans
Selected “areas of pain” to explore and resolve
“Employed Physician Council”
Early activities
The EPC set a goal of 4 days to a working diagnosis for specialty care patients
Identified the existing referral process as an impediment to speedy patient access
Initiated a survey to study the process and systems
Survey process
Tracked time taken to execute referrals of all types
Identified obstacles to access
1. Clinical barriers
2. Process barriers
3. Productivity barriers
Discovered there was not a global issue
Specific to Pain, Neuro and Behavioral Health
Pain ManagementSample Study ResultsBased on Avg. # Daily Encounters
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
w/rvu's Encntrs w/rvu's Encntrs w/rvu's Encntrs w/rvu's Encntrs w/rvu's Encntrs
Jan Feb March April May
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Next steps
EPC was shown tactics to use when working on process improvement (eg: 6 Sigma)
EPC decided to:
Revise referral protocols to the noted specialties by involving affected physicians
Recommend changes in care management to improve access to the specialist
Have clinic directors work on necessary administrative changes
Results
Eureka Moments
The moment the group determined some other physicians were not in support of the agreed process and decided to censure them
Changes to practice style can affect patient access and satisfaction
The discovery that the Compensation Committee needed to represent the interests of all the employed physicians.
The recognition that they needed a strong leader
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Avg. Number of Encounters each day for Each Month FY 2013NeuroScience and NeuroSurgery
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
MGMA Neuro
MGMA NSurg
Avg. Work/Rvu's per Encounter each Month FY 2013NeuroScience and Neurosurgery
Market share
2008-2012 Inpatient Discharges Compared to 5 Key Hospitals
% Market
Hospital County 2008 2012
Ozarks Medical Center HOWELL 60.3% 67.2%
OREGON 54.5% 66.8%
OZARK 20.3% 28.7%
SHANNON 26.7% 36.4%
FULTON AR 58.8% 73.5%
Total OMC 44.1% 54.5%
Source: Missouri Hospital Assoc
Questions