employee ownership: a look at the evidence...employee ownership: a look at the evidence nj/ny center...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence
NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership
presentation, July 31, 2017
Doug Kruse
Rutgers University, NBER, and Beyster Faculty Fellow
![Page 2: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline of talk
I. Why are we interested? 4 broad reasons
II. Current prevalence of employee ownership
III. Research evidence on:
a. Economic performance
b. Economic stability and layoffs
c. Employee pay, wealth, and quality of work life
d. Inequality
IV. The two big objections
V. Implications for companies and policy-makers
2
![Page 3: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
I. Why are we interested?
Employee ownership may:
1. Affect economic performance through effort, cooperation, info-sharing, commitment, turnover, etc.
2. Increase economic stability and decrease unemployment by enhancing job security and company survival
3. Affect overall employee pay and wealth, employee-mgt. relations, and quality of work life
4. Affect societal income and wealth distribution and generally broaden participation in the economic system
3
![Page 4: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
II. Current prevalence of employee ownership
• Most following stats from General Social Survey (GSS)
• Representative sample of adult Americans
• Conducted every two years by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago
• Support from the Employee Ownership Foundation has supported modules on employee ownership and profit sharing in 2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014
4
![Page 5: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Employee owners among all private sector employees, 2002-2014 (GSS data)
20.1%
17.1% 17.8%
19.5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2002 2006 2010 2014
5
![Page 6: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ESOP participants among all private sector employees, 1999-2012 (DOL data)
6
![Page 7: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Employee ownership is common across occupations (GSS data 2002-2014)
7
![Page 8: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Employee ownership is common across industries (GSS data 2002-2014)
8
![Page 9: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ESOPs in NJ and NY (from 2014 Form 5500 data)
Total plans
Total active participants
Total plan
assets (billion
s)
Average assets
per participan
t
ESOPs based in:
New Jersey 148 500,584 $108.0 $215,677
New York 304 728,145 $134.8 $185,066
9
![Page 10: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
III. Research evidence on source of interest #1: Economic performance
6.96
7.27
6.64
7.05
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.8
7
7.2
7.4
2002 2006
Me
an
Le
ve
l o
f W
ork
pla
ce
Eff
ort
on
0-1
0
Sc
ale
Employee-estimated Workplace Effort and Employee Ownership (GSS)
Employee owner Not employee owner 10
![Page 11: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
New meta-analysis of 102 samples with combined 56,984 firms:
• Positive but small relation to hard performance measures on average (4-5% higher productivity)
• Similar results in pre/post comparisons of ESOP adoption as in comparing EO and non-EO firms
• Similar results among small and large firms
• Positive effect has grown stronger over time
• But substantial dispersion in outcomes: some firms do great and others do not
Ernest O’Boyle et al., “Employee ownership and firm performance: a meta-analysis,” Human Resource Management Journal, forthcoming 2017
11
![Page 12: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Results from workers also support positive performance effects.
Analysis of GSS, NBER dataset (40,000+ employees) and Great Place to Work applicants (780 companies, 300,000+ employees) show that employee owners are:
• Less likely to look for other jobs
• More likely to take action when co-worker not working well
But effects depend on other workplace policies . . .
12
![Page 13: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Complementary policies
In all three datasets, employee ownership and profit sharing:
• are linked to policies of greater employee empowerment (employee involvement, training, job security)
• are linked to lower turnover and other favorable outcomes only when combined with employee empowerment policies
(Blasi, Freeman, and Kruse, “Do Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing Help the Best Firms do Even Better?” British Journal of Industrial Relations)
13
![Page 14: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
BJIR results on Shared Capitalism, Empowerment, and Voluntary Turnover
15.3% 14.4%
17.6%
6.3%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
Low employeeempowerment
High employeeempowerment
No shared capitalism
High shared capitalism
14
![Page 15: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
What We Think Is Happening?
The increased productivity is not caused mainly by increased effort.
One major factor is mutual monitoring by employees.
Another major factor is low levels of supervision with greater employee discretion.
Another major factor is lower turnover and better selection of workers (better workers want you.)
15
![Page 16: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Research evidence on source of interest #2: Economic stability and layoffs
3.0% 2.3% 2.6%
1.3%
9.2% 8.5%
12.3%
9.5%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
2002 2006 2010 2014
Percent Laid Off in Prior Year (GSS)
Employee owner Not employee owner16
![Page 17: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Stability of publicly-traded ESOP companies, based on S&P Compustat matched to Form 5500
Kurtulus and Kruse, How Did Employee Ownership Firms
Weather the Past Two Recessions? (Upjohn Institute 2017) 17
![Page 18: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Apart from stability, other research shows greater survival of EO firms compared to similar non-EO firms
Why the greater stability? Results cast doubt on compensation flexibility as explanation. More likely that EO firms retain workers to maintain ownership culture and promote long-term productivity.
Policy implications: Fewer layoffs and greater survival help decrease unemployment and increase macroeconomic stability, creating positive externalities for economy and society that can justify supportive public policy.
18
![Page 19: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Research evidence on source of interest #3: Employee outcomes
Several studies show:
• EO companies have higher total compensation levels
• ESOP firms generally do not cut base pay when adopting ESOP: base pay is stable or increases (despite occasional concessions)
• ESOPs add to employee wealth (not substituting for other assets)
19
![Page 20: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
How can this be? Why doesn’t employee ownership substitute for wages or other benefits?
Employee ownership may often function like an “efficiency wage” from economic theory: The cost of paying above market can be offset by
• attracting better workers
• decreasing turnover
• discouraging shirking
• increasing morale
So employee ownership may increase worker performance if on top of standard wages and benefits, but have no effect if used as wage substitute
--If a substitute, workers see it as shift of financial risk rather than empowerment 20
![Page 21: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Other employee outcomes
43.0%
34.4%
27.9% 28.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
2006 2014
Employee owners are more likely to be in employee involvement teams where workers make decisions
(GSS)
Employee owner Not employee owner21
![Page 22: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
64.8% 69.0%
44.1% 42.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2006 2014
Employee owners are more likely to receive company-sponsored training (GSS)
Employee owner Not employee owner
22
![Page 23: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Employee owners are also more likely than non-owners to report:
• Better views of management-employee relations
• Company is fair to employees
• Co-workers can be relied on for help
• Greater job security (consistent with layoff data)
• Higher job satisfaction, but only if combined with other “high-performance” policies (training, job security, employee involvement, pay at or above market)
23
![Page 24: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Research evidence on source of interest #4:
Economic inequality Productivity has been going up, but most workers haven’t benefited from
productivity gains since 1970’s
Cumulative change in total economy productivity and real
hourly compensation of production/nonsupervisory workers,
1948–2015
24
![Page 25: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Where have the productivity gains gone?
Disproportionately to those with high
incomes
25
![Page 26: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Other evidence shows that:
•Part of the growth in inequality is due to a shift in favor of capital income at the expense of labor income
•Capital income is more concentrated than labor income
•The shift to capital income is unlikely to change soon (Piketty)
26
![Page 27: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Can employee ownership and profit sharing play a role here, tempering inequality through broader access to capital ownership and income for middle and lower classes?
•Was key motivation for Sen. Russell Long who put ESOPs into 1974 ERISA law
•Freeman argues that “Who owns the robots (i.e. technology) rules the world!” and that we need broader capital ownership: workers need to own the “robots” that are increasingly taking their jobs in order to keep economic progress broadly shared and avoid a two-tiered society
27
![Page 28: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
IV. Two key objections: 1) Free rider problem
28
![Page 29: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2) Risk aversion
29
![Page 30: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
What about the free rider problem?
Productivity is generally higher in EO firms. As shown earlier, a study of over 40,000 worker reports finds that worker co-monitoring helps overcome the incentives to free ride: workers with a greater stake in performance monitor each other more closely and are more willing to take action against shirkers.
Such efforts work best with other “high-performance” empowerment policies and practices (training, job security, employee involvement in decisions, and pay at or above market level).
30
![Page 31: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
What about the risk aversion problem?
Excessive risk is a danger, but:
•Even among the most risk-averse of 4,000+ employees surveyed, two-thirds want at least some ownership, profit sharing, or stock options in their pay package
•These plans generally come on top of market level pay and benefits, greatly reducing risk since workers are not sacrificing fixed pay.
•The biggest financial risk faced by most workers is job loss, which studies suggest is reduced by employee ownership.
•Harry Markowitz, a Nobel winner for portfolio theory, explicitly rejects the idea that risk aversion condemns employee ownership. His theory concludes that workers can prudently have 10-15% of assets in employee ownership if rest of their household wealth portfolio is well-diversified.
31
![Page 32: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
V. Implications for Companies and Policy-makers
For companies:
Employee ownership can improve performance, commitment, retention, innovation, but a company can’t just install a plan and expect automatic positive effect
--may even be harmful if employees just see it as attempt to shift financial risk without giving employees discretion and skills to improve performance (“We want you to work harder because you own stock, but we’re still going to look over your shoulder every minute”)
32
![Page 33: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Maximize the value of employee ownership by combining it with supportive HR policies to give employees the skills and opportunities to make a difference.
Such policies can include:
• employee involvement in decisions (informal or formal)
• information-sharing
• increased training
• selective recruitment
• fewer levels of hierarchy and lower levels of supervision
• more job security
33
![Page 34: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
For policy-makers:
• U.S. has rich history, going back to the founding fathers, of support for sharing economic rewards and ownership broadly
• A variety of policies are
available to increase broad-based sharing, from low-cost ideas (e.g., commissions, bully pulpit) to more aggressive approaches (e.g., restructuring tax incentives) 34
![Page 35: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Rutgers National Fellowship Program
• Created in 2008 -- more than 100 fellows to date
• Most are junior scholars, with senior professors from many universities as faculty mentors
• Kelso Workshop supported by John Menke and Employee Ownership Foundation every January
• Beyster Symposium supported by Employee Ownership Foundation and Foundation for Enterprise Development every June
• Growing number of young scholars now tenured around the country
35
![Page 36: Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence...Employee Ownership: A Look at the Evidence NJ/NY Center for Employee Ownership presentation, July 31, 2017 Doug Kruse Rutgers University,](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042303/5ece9cd9c5d6336ece78405b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
A new way of working?
Bicycle built for seven, where riders all face each other (made by Hammacher Schlemmer) 36