endangered seas programme 1 oecd workshop on iuu activities paris, 19-20 april 2004 what data do...
TRANSCRIPT
Endangered SeasProgramme
1
OECD Workshop on IUU activitiesParis, 19-20 April 2004
What data do NGOs have?
Dr. Simon Cripps
Director - Global Marine Programme
WWF-International
Switzerland
Endangered SeasProgramme
2
Approach to Presentation
• Role of NGO's• Steps to eliminate IUU• Examples of NGO contributions re. Information to fulfill
steps• Recommendations to the Taskforce• The bigger picture• Conclusions
Endangered SeasProgramme
3
Role of NGOs
• Agents provocateurs• Public pressure• Setting a high bar• Brokering solutions behind the scenes• Preparation of advocacy material / briefs• Focussing on solutions and outcomes• Investigation and intelligence
Several points require data / intelligence - but commonly for strategic or communications
Endangered SeasProgramme
4
Steps to address IUU
• Eliminate flags of convenience• Close ports, markets & companies• FOA plan of action to prevent deter & eliminate IUU• National legislation • Ratify UN Fish Stocks & Compliance Agreements• Strengthen RFMOs• Strengthen cooperation e.g. MCS
Endangered SeasProgramme
5
Eliminate flags of conveniencee.gs of NGO contributions
• Revealing tricks of the trade– e.g Patagonian toothfish - COLTO (Pacific Andes)
• Identifying major offenders and their locus and modus operandi– e.g transshipment - Greenpeace, WWF
• Reviewing available legislation and gaps– IUCN, WWF, Oceana, TRAFFIC
• Quantifying extent and impacts - pressure– Greenpeace high seas, WWF / TNC local presences
Endangered SeasProgramme
6
Close ports, markets & companies
For particular fisheries and situations:– Which ports are primary vectors?– What are the trade flows and the pinch-points (e.g.
small number of wholesalers)?– Which companies are involved and who are the
investors?– Which consumers commonly purchase IUU
products?• Why?• Can they be influenced - how?
Endangered SeasProgramme
7
National legislation
• Advocacy and lobbying material• Evidence for litigation• "Data" & analysis on legal opportunities, existing or
new• Messages that increase political will– e.g. effect on jobs and incomes– subsidies– trade disparities
• Local / regional examples– socio-economic effects
Endangered SeasProgramme
8
RFMOs
• Varying roles / mandates of RFMOs
• Varying methodologies for tackling IUU - if at all
• Varying effectiveness
• Comparisons / reviews necessary
• One of few ways to govern the high seas
– WWF producing CCRF Analysis, RFMO Scorecard
Endangered SeasProgramme
9
IUU loopholes
• Patagonian toothfish– Traffic, COLTO, moratorium, consumer pressure,
MSC?• Tunas– TRAFFIC, "dolphin friendly" coalition, WWF-MPO
• High Seas e.g. Indian Ocean Orange Roughy– WWF, Greenpeace, Industry, TRAFFIC
• Fisheries critically impacting habitat or particular species e.g. turtles, cetaceans, sharks and seabirds– various specialist or regional, local NGOs– forthcoming bottom trawl campaigns
Endangered SeasProgramme
10
Recommendations to the Taskforce
• Develop sharp, decisive recommendations to eliminate particular IUU situations.
– e.g. WWF Tuna Trans-shipment Case Study
• Establish 'up-to-date/real time' information collation mechanism
• Describe the baseline situation
• Strong focussed leadership by Taskforce
• Involve stakeholders appropriately and innovatively
• Work with differing roles and strengths of stakeholders
Endangered SeasProgramme
11
The Bigger Picture
• Taskforce - leaders in fisheries management community– problem of IUU in perspective with respect to poorly
managed 'managed fisheries'– if IUU were absent, would fisheries be sustainable?– clear opportunity to establish a forum for innovation
in fisheries management– piece by piece, steps to elimination • identify application of suite of specific tools for
those situations.• WWF facilitate particular stakeholder engagement
Endangered SeasProgramme
12
Conclusions
Within a framework of a work-plan to tackle IUU there are several steps / approaches
Each have data sets required for: intelligence, strategic planning, communications, evidence, advocacy etc
Different NGOs have both different areas of interest and hence engagement and approach
Many seemingly peripheral data can be of much use - e.g. trade, investment, consumer preference
The OECD taskforce can establish a clearing house mechanism for this data and pull all the threads together within defined, implementable themes