endodontic new zealand journal. 34 july 2006.pdfnew zealand endodontic journal vol 34 july 2006 page...

26
Endodontic Journal Vol 34 JULY 2006 ISSN 0114-7722 New Zealand Contents 3 Editorial Peter Cathro 4 Intracanal Medicaments Revisited Jack Lin 16 New Root Canal Filling Materials Rajneesh Roy 25 2006 Annual General Meeting 26 Abstracts Root-end Filling Materials: Bun San Chong & Rationale and Tissue Response Thomas R Pitt Ford Surgical Preparation: Kenneth Hargreaves & Anaesthesia & Hemostasis Asma Khan Comparative Evaluation of Thomas R Dunavant, Endodontic Irrigants against John D Regan, Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Gerald N Glickman, Eric S Solomon, Allen L Honeyman New Zealand Society of Endodontics (Inc) President Peter Cathro PO Box 12025 Maori Hill Dunedin Secretary Mike Jameson 2 Granville Terrace Belleknowes Dunedin Treasurer Sarah Jardine PO Box 7788 Wellesley Street Auckland Journal Editor Peter Cathro PO Box 12025 Maori Hill Dunedin Front Cover: Intracanal medicaments

Upload: others

Post on 29-May-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 1

EndodonticJournalVol 34 JULY 2006 ISSN 0114-7722

New

Zea

lan

d

Contents

3 Editorial Peter Cathro 4 Intracanal Medicaments Revisited Jack Lin

16 New Root Canal Filling Materials Rajneesh Roy

25 2006 Annual General Meeting

26 Abstracts Root-end Filling Materials: Bun San Chong & Rationale and Tissue Response Thomas R Pitt Ford

Surgical Preparation: Kenneth Hargreaves & Anaesthesia & Hemostasis Asma Khan

Comparative Evaluation of Thomas R Dunavant, Endodontic Irrigants against John D Regan, Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Gerald N Glickman, Eric S Solomon, Allen L Honeyman

New Zealand Societyof Endodontics (Inc)

PresidentPeter CathroPO Box 12025Maori HillDunedin

SecretaryMike Jameson2 Granville TerraceBelleknowesDunedin

TreasurerSarah JardinePO Box 7788Wellesley StreetAuckland

Journal EditorPeter CathroPO Box 12025Maori HillDunedin

Front Cover: Intracanal medicaments

Page 2 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

Editorial NoticEs

The New Zealand Endodontic Journal is published twice yearly and sent free to members of the New Zealand Society of Endodontics (Inc). The subscription rates for membership of the Society are $35 per annum in New Zealand or $45 plus postage for overseas members. Graduates of the University of Otago School of Dentistry enjoy complimentarymembershipforthefirstyearafter graduation. Subscription inquiries should be sent to the Honorary Secretary, Dr Mike Jameson, 2 Granville Terrace, Dunedin. Contributions for inclusion in the Journal should be sent to the Editor, Dr Robert Love, PO Box 12025, Dunedin. Deadline for inclusion in the May or November issue is the firstdayoftheprecedingmonth. All expressions of opinion and statements of fact are published on the authority of the writer under whose name they appear and are not necessarily those of the New Zealand Society of Endodontics, the Editor or any of theScientificAdvisers.

iNformatioN for authorsThe Editor welcomes original articles, review articles, case reports, views and comments, correspondence, announcements and news items. The Editor reserves the right to edit contributions to ensure conciseness, clarity and consistency to the style of the Journal. Contributions will normally be subjected to peer review. It is the wish of the Editor to encourage practitioners and others to submit material for publication. Assistance with word processing and photographic and graphic art production will be available to authors.

arraNgEmENtArticles should be typewritten on one side of A4 paper with double spacing and 3cm margins. The author’s name should appear under the title and name and postal address at the end of the article. If possible, the manu-script should also be submitted on computer disc, either Macintosh or PC compatible.

rEfErENcEsReferences cited in the text should be placed in parenthesis stating the authors’ names and date, eg (Sundqvist & Reuterving 1980). At the end of the article references should be listed alphabetically giving surnames and initials of all authors, the year, the full title of the article, name of periodical, volume number and page numbers.

The form of reference to a journal article is:Sundqvist G, Reuterving C-O (1980) Isolation of

Actinomyces israelii from periapical lesion. Journal of Endodontics 6, 602-6.

The form of reference to a book is:Trowbridge HO, Emling RC (1993) Inflammation,

4th edn, pp 51-7. Chicago, USA: Quintessence Publishing Company Inc.

IllustratIonsIllustrations should be submitted as clear drawings, black & white or colour photographs and be preferably of column width. Radiographs are acceptable. However a black & white photograph is preferred. Illustrations must be numbered to match the text and bear the author’s name and an indication of the top edge on the back. Legends are required for all illustrations and should be typewritten on a separate page.

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 3

EdItorIal / PrEsIdEnt’s rEPort

There have been some exciting developments in Endodontics over the last few years, in particular the areas of irrigation, medication and obturation. Rajneesh Roy’s article details some of the new products available for obturation. Jack Lin’s article on intra-canal medication revisits the age-old dilemma – does Ledermix still have a place in our medication armamentarium? I am reminded by a comment made by Dr. Cliff Ruddle at the European Society of Endodontists meeting in Greece – “ I hear so many different waystoclean,shapeandfillcanals.Whatdoesthismean?Itmeanswestillreallydon’tknow what we’re doing. If we did, there would be one gold standard!” It remains the clinician’sjobtointerpretscientificresultsandapplythemtotheirdailypractice.

ObituaryDr.BernieHoskinhadavariedcareerfromfighterpilot,tocharteredaccountantandthendentistry. Bernie’s contribution to Endodontics is enormous and he was founder of The New Zealand Society of Endodontics and a Life Member. Bernie gave a great deal of his time and energy to the profession, holding many positions in the NZDA and other special societies. Bernie was a highly respected practitioner and colleague and an inspiration to many.

Editor RetiresAfter a number of years of involvement as secretary then President and Editor I feel that itistimetostandaside.TherewillbeanelectionofofficersattheAGMinSeptember,but I would be particularly interested in hearing from anyone who feels they would like to take on the role as editor. The team at Otago University Print is delightful and easy to work with and we are most fortunate to have a steady stream of material thanks to our post-graduate students who are producing excellent assignments.

Endodontic LectureIn mid-march 2007, the Society will be bringing Ramachandran Nair on a tour with lectures in Auckland, Wellington Christchurch and Dunedin. Dr. Nair is a Senior Scientist in the Department of Oral Structural Biology, Centre of Dental Medicine, University ofZurich.HeisalsotheChairmanoftheSwissSocietyforEndodontologyScientificCommittee. He has numerous publications and is perhaps best known for his chapter in Pathways of the Pulp textbook and his long-term light and electron microscopic study on therapy resistant periodical lesions. The dates and venues are to be advised, but don’t miss out on this fantastic opportunity.

Peter Cathro

Page 4 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

Intracanal MEdIcaMEnts rEvIsItEd

Jack lIn

IntroductIon

Endodontic treatment is usually performed when apical periodontitis is present. The aetiology of pulpal and periapical tissue inflammation is microbial infection (Kakehashi et al. 1965; Paterson 1976; Gomes et al. 1996). Mechanical instrumentation and irrigation are the main methods of removing bacteria from the root canal space (Kettering & Torabinejad 1998). Microorganisms can survive after instrumentation and irrigation, and show an increase in numbers in empty canals between visits without any intracanal medicament (Bystrom & Sundqvist 1981, 1983, 1985). The complexity of the root canal system (Meyer 1970) and the ability of microorganisms to penetrate dentinal tubules and lateral canals (Love 1996; Siqueira et al. 1996) may account for this. Intracanal medication has been advocated individually or in combination to:1. Eliminate remaining microbial populations in the

root canal system after canal instrumentation.2. Reduce inflammation of pulp remnants (and

thereby reduce pain).3. Prevent contamination between appointments.4. Inducehealingofcalcifiedtissue.5. Render canal contents inert and neutralise tissue

debris.6. Act as a barrier against leakage from the

temporaryfilling.7. Controlinflammatoryrootresorptionfollowing

traumatic injuries.8. Help to dry persistently wet canals (Abbott

1990a; Chong & Pitt Ford 1992).

Antibacterial intracanal medicament is used to eliminate residual bacteria after chemomechanical instrumentation. The toxicity and potency of the antibacterial agent will eliminate microorganisms, but also has the potential to damage the periapical tissue. Therefore the biocompatibilities of medicaments need to be considered (Taylor et al. 1989; Abbott et al. 1990; Tepel et al. 1994). Medicaments with an anti-inflammatory agent are used to reduce postoperative pain and acute

exacerbations. Corticosteroids have been used to reduce interappointment pain (Negm 2001; Ehrmann et al. 2003). This paper will a review the current use of Ledermix® paste (Lederle Pharmaceuticals, Cyanamid GMBH, Wolfratshausen, Germany) and other current intracanal medicaments.

lEdErMIx® rEvIsItEd

Ledermix can be classified as a setting (not tobe reviewed here) or non-setting material. The non-setting Ledermix paste consists of two active compounds, which are an anti-inflammatory cortisone derivative triamcinolone acetonide (glucocorticosteroid 1%) combined with a tetracycline antibiotic, demethylchlortetracycline (demeclocyline 3.021%). The remaining components form a water-soluble cream base (Lederle Pharmaceuticals 1981). Non-setting Ledermix paste is used as an endodontic medicament.

antIbactErIal EffEct of lEdErMIxThe antibacterial action of Ledermix paste is from the broad-spectrum tetracycline antibiotic. This is effective against the Gram-negative and Gram-positive anaerobic microorganisms normally found in endodontic infections (Dahlen & Haapasalo 1998). Heling and Pecht (1991) reported that Gram-positive microorganisms were affected by lower concentrations of tetracycline than the Gram-negative microorganisms, and other antibiotics showed a more potent antibacterial effect than Ledermix. In experimental conditions, clindamycin was more effective in the agar diffusion test and showed on ability to penetrate dentinal tubules up to 400 µm (Lin et al.2003).Thustheefficacyofthe Ledermix paste as an ideal endodontic antibiotic may be suspect.

Demeclocycline is generally effective against common endodontic bacteria at concentrations raging from 0.05 to 128mg/L (Abbott et al. 1990). Since Ledermix paste produces a demeclocycline concentration of 50,000 mg/L it should be able to inhibit bacteria (Sutter & Finegold 1976).

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 5

However, the concentration of demeclocycline achieved within the dentinal tubules, periodontal tissues and periapical tissues varies as a function of time and position. Abbott et al. (1988) used absorption spectrophotometric analysis in extracted human tooth roots which were endodontically prepared and dressed with Ledermix. They found the great majority of demeclocycline diffused through dentine, and little through the root apex. Withinthefirstdaytherateofthedemeclocyclinerelease was the highest and concentration adjacent to the root canal achieved the bacterial inhibitory level (Abbott et al. 1990). This level dropped withinthefirstweekto21.1mg/L(Abbott et al. 1988) and inhibited only three of thirteen strains of bacteria in another study (Abbott et al. 1990). The rate of release of demeclocycline at day one was about 10 times more than the rate after one week. Therefore demeclocycline might be effective against bacteriawithin the first few days afterLedermix placement, but would not be suitable as a long term dressing.

MIxturEs of lEdErMIx PastEA mixture of Ledermix paste and calcium hydroxide has been used as a canal dressing. The aim was toproduceadressingthatwasanti-inflammatoryand antibacterial in its action and also capable of inducing hard tissue formation. Mixing these two medicaments alters the release and diffusion of the active components of the Ledermix paste (Abbott et al. 1989a), but did not decrease their individual antibacterial potency when tested on Lactobacillus casei and Streptococcus mutans (Taylor et al. 1989). However, in Seow’s study reported that a mixture of calcium hydroxide and Ledermix paste decreased their individual antibacterial effectiveness when tested on Streptococcus sanguis and Staphylococcus aureus (Seow 1990).

PEnEtratIon of lEdErMIx through dEntInE

Dentine is a calcified tissue traversed by dentinal tubules. The diameter of these tubules is approximately 1 µm at the dentinoenamel junction, reaching 3 µm at the pulp chamber surface (Tagger & Tagger 1998). The release and dentine diffusion characteristics of triamcinolone and demeclocycline have been investigated under different conditions (Abbott et al. 1988; Abbott et al. 1989b, 1989a). Abbott (1989a) demonstrated using tracer molecules from Ledermix paste

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

and spectrophotometer analysis that the active components of Ledermix diffused through the dentinal tubules and neither a smear layer nor cementum completely blocks diffusion. However, the removal of cementum and the smear layer did increase dentinal permeation of the experimental tracer molecules (Abbott et al. 1989b).

tIssuE toxIcIty and bIologIcal consIdEratIons

Ledermix paste was found to be non irritating to periapical tissues and a normal histological appearance of periapical tissues was observed 3 months after application (Barker & Lockett 1972). However, Tepel et al.(1994)foundaninfiltrateofinflammatory cells in the periapical tissue afterthe use of Ledermix in rats with experimentally induced apical periodontitis. The periapical lesions were larger than the untreated teeth with periapical periodontitis. Therefore the combination of a corticosteroid and an antibiotic appears to impair healing. In an in vitro study by Taylor et al (1989), it was found that Ledermix paste killed the fibroblastsofmiceataconcentrationof10-3 mg/mL and above. It also killed S. mutans at the same concentration but required a one thousand-fold greater concentration to kill Lactobacillus casei.

The corticosteroid component of Ledermix, triamcinolone acetonide, was reported to be approximately five times more potent than cortisol on an effect/weight basis (Fauci et al. 1976). Shortly after the introduction of Ledermix, opposition arose to its use due to a perceived risk of systemic side effects (Klotz et al. 1965). De Deus & Han (1967) reported that hydrocortisone applied directly to the dental pulp in hamsters could be detected in other organs within 2 minutes. Hargreaves (2002) and Seltzer (2000) state that the intracanal use of corticosteroids reduces the inflammatory response, suppresses vasodilationand limits neutrophil migration. They also interfere with phagocytosis and protein synthesis. As a result, infections became rampant and tissue repair was delayed. Abbott (1992) calculated that the highest possible amount of Ledermix paste can be used as an intracanal dressing, and analysed the release and diffusion characteristics, making comparisons with known endogenous levels of corticosteroids. He suggested that the intracanal use of Ledermix paste is unlikely to result in any systemic side effects.

Page 6 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

Post-trEatMEnt PaIn

and flarE uPs

Triamcinolone could be used effectively to reduce oreliminateinflammationandcontrolpostoperativeendodontic pain (Wolfsohn 1954; Schneider 1968; Hargreaves & Seltzer 2002). Abbott (1992) demonstrated that triamcinolone released from Ledermix in the root canal, enters the systemic circulation via diffusion through dentinal tubules, lateral canals and the apical foramen. He also found30%wasreleasedafterthefirst24hours,andthe remaining 70% by the end of 14 weeks. The Ledermix dressing was found to be most effective in controlling postoperative pain associated with acute apical periodontitis, with a rapid onset of pain (Negm 2001; Ehrmann et al. 2003). Researchers have found that an asymptomatic tooth with a necrotic pulp (with or without radiographic radiolucencies) treated endodontically with the accepted methods may have an acute exacerbation of symptoms(“flare-up”)(Bystrom&Sundqvist1985).Matthews et al (1994) described the effectiveness of pain relieving treatments provided for acute dental pain from irreversible pulpitis and acute apical periodontitis and evaluated these after 24 hours. By usingfivedifferenttreatmentmodalities,includingextraction, Ledermix was shown to give the greatest pain relief (Matthews et al. 1994). Rimmer (1991) foundthatthemeanflare-upscoresoftheintracanalmedicaments that contained corticosteroid/antibiotic mixturesweresignificantlylowerinbothsystemicantibioticandnon-antibioticgroupsthantheflare-up score of the control groups. Trope (1990) revealedthatpostoperativeflare-upswereclinicalmanifestationsofanacuteperiapicalinflammationassociated with infection. Importantly, he found theincidenceofflare-upswasindependentoftheintracanal medicament used. In the study, the patient’s responses to various clinical manifestations were purely subjective. Pain described as severe and very distressful by one patient may be described as mildormoderatebyothers.Therefore“flare-up”isa subjective term for which the psychological effect cannot be eliminated (Rimmer 1991).

ExtErnal InflaMMatory androot rEsorPtIon

The action of the triamcinolone component of Ledermix can biologically inactivate clastic cells associated with root resorption (Heithersay 1994).

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

The corticosteroid directly inhibits the spreading of dentinoclasts, suggesting that it acts by detaching resorption dentinoclasts from the root surface (Pierce et al. 1988).

Other studies showed that replanted teeth after extraction followed by mechanical instrumentation and medicated with Ledermix inhibited inflammatoryrootresorptionorinflammationoftheperiodontal membrane (Pierce & Lindskog 1987; Thong et al. 2001). Wong and Sae-Lim 2002 in an in vivo study showed that immediate replantation of extracted teeth had a high occurrence of complete healing, and 1 hour delayed (bench dry) teeth were shown to have a high occurrence of replacement resorptionwiththeassociatedinflammatoryrootresorption. The study also suggested improved healing and reduced root resorption with roots treated with Ledermix paste compared to untreated dried replanted teeth, but the difference was not statisticallysignificant(Wong&Sae-Lim2002).Bryson et al (2002) in an in vivo study also used dogs teeth with extended dry times. They found thatLedermixtreatedrootshadsignificantlymorehealing and less resorption than the roots treated with calcium hydroxide. Immediate intracanal placement of Ledermix paste was therefore recommended at the emergency visit after an avulsion injury to decrease resorption and increase favourable healing (Abbott et al. 1990; Bryson et al. 2002).

dIscolouratIon

Discolouration of teeth dressed with Ledermix paste may be due to the tetracycline antibiotic. It was initially thought that the uptake of tetracycline into hardtissuesrequiredactivecalcification.However,a study has shown that tetracycline uptake may take place in a fully mineralised tooth (Kim & Abbott 2000). Further studies demonstrated Ledermix paste used as an intracanal medicament may cause discolouration of both mature and immature teeth after it had been in the canals for more than 4 weeks (Kim et al. 2000b, 2000a). Immature teeth had a greater degree of discolouration than mature teeth. ExposingLedermix paste filled teeth tosunlight caused teeth to become dark. Therefore when using Ledermix paste clinically in anterior teeth especially those of the young, caution should be taken. Ledermix paste should not left in the coronal portion of the tooth or another intracanal medicament should be considered.

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 7

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

currEnt rEcoMMEndatIons rEtrEatMEntsThe microorganisms present after endodontic treatment failure are different from those normally found in an untreated necrotic dental pulp. E. faecalis appears to be highly resistant to medicaments used during treatment, and is one of the few microorganisms that have been shown in vitro to resist the antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide (Stevens & Grossman 1983; Bystrom & Sundqvist 1985; Haapasalo & Orstavik 1987; Orstavik & Haapasalo 1990; Safavi et al. 1990; Camoes et al. 2003). E. faecalis was commonly recovered from previously endodontically treated teeth (Molander et al. 1998; Sundqvist et al. 1998; Pinheiro et al. 2003). E. faecalis has also been reported to have the ability to survive in root canals as single organisms without the support of other bacteria (Fabricius et al. 1982), and it also survived in an environment with restricted nutrient supply (Sundqvist et al. 1998). The virulence of E. faecalis in root canals associated with endodontic failures might be related to the ability of E. faecalis cells to maintain a capacity to invade dentinal tubules and adhere to collagen in the presence of human serum (Love 2001). When retreating failed cases alternative intracanal medicaments and intracanal irrigants should be considered.

calcIuM hydroxIdECalcium hydroxide has been used for various endodonticproceduressinceitwasfirstdescribedin 1920 as an endodontic adjunct (Hermann 1920, 1930).Calciumhydroxidepastescanbeclassifiedas setting pastes (not reviewed here), generally used as cavity liners or endodontic sealers. Non-setting calcium hydroxide pastes are used primarily as intracanal medicaments. Other successful applications are as a pulp capping and pulpotomy dressing (Spångberg 1998). The efficacy of calcium hydroxide in endodontic therapy is from its bactericidal effects (Hermann 1930; Bystrom & Sundqvist 1985), its destructive effect on bacterial cell membranes and protein structures (Gordon et al. 1985; Safavi & Nichols 1993), inhibition of tooth resorption (Tronstad 1988), and induction of repair by hard tissue formation (Foreman & Barnes 1990).

chEMIcal and antIbactErIal charactErIstIcs of calcIuM hydroxIdE Calcium hydroxide is a strongly alkaline substance, which has a pH of approximately 12.5 (Tronstad et al. 1981; Estrela et al. 1994; Beltes et al. 1997). The main actions of calcium hydroxide come from the ionic dissociation of Ca2+ and OH- ions. These ions acted on vital tissue and bacteria to initiate the induction of hard tissue deposition and the antibacterial effects (Holland et al. 1979). Calcium hydroxide needs to diffuse through tissues and the hydroxyl concentration is decreased because of the dentine hydroxyapatite buffering property (Nerwich et al. 1993; Haapasalo et al. 2000). Tronstad et al (1981) found the placement of calcium hydroxide in a root canal will increase the pH of root dentine. Furthermore, the pH values around the canal space decreased toward the peripheral dentine, which indicates the hydroxide ion diffuses through the dentine. However, a larger apical foramen size allows more calcium hydroxide to diffuse through the apical region and results in a higher pH value around the apical tissues (Robert et al. 2005).

Intracanal medicaments might prevent the penetration of bacteria from saliva to the root canal by their antibacterial properties acting as a chemical barrier against leakage and killing bacteria. Siqueira et al (1998) in an in vitro study evaluated the calcium hydroxide paste as more effective than camphorated paramonochlorophenol (CMCP) in preventing root canal recontamination by bacteria from saliva. Despite the vehicle used, calcium hydroxide is an effective physical barrier, which can kill remaining microorganisms by withholding substrates for growth and by limiting space for multiplication (Dahlen & Haapasalo 1998; Siqueira & de Uzeda 1998). Studies have shown that after 7 days of calcium hydroxide dressing, the highest pH value was reached and maintained (Pacios et al. 2004, Camoes 2003), which gives the most antibacterial effect (Estrela et al. 1998).

InhIbItIon of calcIuM hydroxIdECalcium hydroxide’s antibacterial effectiveness might be reduced or impeded by dentine, acids, proteins and carbon dioxide (Siqueira et al. 1996; Siqueira & de Uzeda 1998; Haapasalo et al. 2000; Portenier et al. 2001). When Ca2+ ions come into contact with carbon dioxide (CO2) or carbonate ions (CO3

-) in tissue, calcium carbonate was formed which alter the mineralisation process by the overall consumption of the Ca2+ ions (Holland

Page 8 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

et al. 1979). However, calcium carbonate has neither biological nor antibacterial properties (Estrela 1994). Kwon et al (2004) used Fourier transform – (FT) Raman spectroscopy to identify the calcium hydroxide converted into calcium carbonate at the apical region. They also reported that calcium hydroxide reduced its pH in the apical regions which might be neutralised by carbon dioxidedissolvedinbodyfluidsthathadpenetratedthrough the apical foramen (Kwon et al. 2004). An in vitro study investigating the efficacy ofintracanal calcium hydroxide paste found it might be affected by carbon dioxide (Cohen & Lasfargues 1988). Microorganisms require carbon dioxide for survival within necrotic pulps. By altering the carbon dioxide concentration an environment may be created which was unfavourable for the microorganisms (Kontakiotis et al. 1995). A naturalagentthathadthecapabilityofinfluencingthe pH value was carbon dioxide. It might originate from the bacterial metabolism in the canals or dentinal tubules. An in vitro study by Fuss et al (1996) revealed the calcium hydroxide pH value was decreased when examined by introducing carbon dioxide gas in sealed receptacle. However, the pH value was decreased to a mean of 12.54, which was still bactericidal according to Bystrom et al (1985).

Haapasalo et al (2000) used dentine powder to investigate the inactivation of antibacterial activity with various root canal medicaments. They concluded the dentine powder model was an efficient tool that interactedbetweenendodonticmedicaments, dentine, and microbes. They also found that calcium hydroxide and dentine powder reduced the effectiveness against E. faecalis. They indicated that dentine acts as an effective buffer of the alkalinity of calcium hydroxide and inhibited a deeper penetration of hydrogen ions into the dentinal tubules (Haapasalo et al. 2000). SimilarfindingswerereportedbyPortenieret al (2001), concluding that calcium hydroxide was sensitive to inhibition by both inorganic and organic compounds (Portenier et al. 2001).

InfluEncE on antIbactErIal EffEctEndodontic infections are multimicrobial and no medicaments can effectively eliminate all the bacteria found in infected root canals. A combination of two or more medicaments might be produced an additive or synergistic effect. Siqueira and Uzeda (1997) in an in vitro study using agar diffusion tests found calcium hydroxide/CMCP

paste to be effective against all bacterial strains. They demonstrated that calcium hydroxide mixed with distilled water or glycerin failed to show a zone of bacterial inhibition due to the limitations of the diffusion test. Calcium hydroxide had a low solubility and does not diffuse well through an agar culture medium (Siqueira & de Uzeda 1997). Similar results were also reported in their earlier study (Siqueira & de Uzeda 1996) showing calcium hydroxide/glycerin/CMCP pastes effectively killed bacteria in the tubules. In contrast, Morrier et al (2004) demonstrated that calcium hydroxide/glycerin mixes showed the largest zone of bacterial inhibition. Other studies revealed that calcium hydroxide was superior to CMCP against anaerobic microorganisms (Bystrom et al. 1985; Stuart et al. 1991; Georgopoulou et al. 1993). Overall, calcium hydroxide combined with CMCP has been reported to be more effective in eliminating Enterococci than calcium hydroxide paste used alone (Stevens & Grossman 1983; Haapasalo & Orstavik 1987; Siqueira & de Uzeda 1997, 1998; Gomes et al. 2002). Evidence suggests that the association of calcium hydroxide with CMCP has a broader antibacterial spectrum, a higher radius of antibacterial action and kills bacteria faster than if calcium hydroxide is mixed with inert vehicles. CMCP should be considered as an additional medicament with calcium hydroxide (Siqueira & Lopes 1999).

Siren et al (2004) looked at the antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine or iodine potassium iodide (IKI) in vitro. The model they used for dentinal tubule infection of root canals was originally described by Haapasalo and Orstavik (1987). Chlorhexidine/calcium hydroxide and IKI/calcium hydroxide combinations showed disinfection in 1 week. Fuss et al (2002) and Lin et al (2005) in in vitro studies demonstrated the addition of IKI or electrically activated copper to calcium hydroxide significantly increased its antibacterial activity and penetration in to the dentinal tubules (Fuss et al. 2002; Lin et al. 2005). Behene et al (2001) suggested that thick mixtures (high viscosity) of calcium hydroxide were not ideal for use as an intracanal antimicrobial agent. The degree of calcium hydroxide antibacterial levels depended on release of the hydroxyl ions. The ability of these ions to diffuse through dentine should exceed the buffering ability of the dentine. Therefore, the lower the viscosity of the paste, the

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 9

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

higher the ionic dissociation which allows it to penetrate deeper into the dentine tubules (Behnen et al. 2001).

aPExIfIcatIonApexificationisamethodofinducingacalcifiedbarrier in a root with an open apex or the continued apical development of an incompletely formed root in teeth with a necrotic pulp (American Association of Endodontists 2003).

Induction of apical closure provides more favourable clinical conditions for conventional endodontic treatments. The most commonly used medicament inapexificationwascalciumhydroxide,howeverthe introduction of mineral trioxide aggregate provides and alternative material which allows single-visitapexification(Rafter2005).

Calcium hydroxide introduced into the periapical region appeares to be well tolerated and subsequently resorbed (Martin & Crabb 1977). Holland et al (1977) demonstrated that the reactions of the periapical tissues to calcium hydroxide were similar to the pulp tissues. Calcium hydroxide produced a multi-layered necrosis with subjacent mineralisation. Spångberg (1969) found that calcium hydroxide implanted in guinea-pig bone caused an inflammatory responsewith inhibitedbone healing after 2 weeks of a calcium hydroxide dressing. It was replaced by new bone within 12 weeks. Supporting Spångberg’s finding, Cvek (1972) observed apical root closure and bone healing following intracanal placement of calcium hydroxide in 50 of 55 maxillary incisors with immature roots. The high pH of calcium hydroxide was an important factor to induce hard tissue formation. Javelet et al (1985) compared the ability of calcium hydroxide (pH 11.8) and calcium chloride (pH 4.4) to induce formation of hard tissue barriers in pulpless immature monkey teeth. He found more rapid periapical repair and apical barrier formation in the presence of calcium hydroxide.

An in vitro study using calcium hydroxide demonstrated an increased inhibition of attached humangingivalfibroblasts,althoughthiswasnotstatisticallysignificant.Theauthorsalsoproposedthat calcium hydroxide should be avoided as an interim medicament when trying to regenerate or establish new attachment in tissues adjacent to endodontically involved teeth (Breault et al. 1995). On the other hand, calcium hydroxide did

not affect the healing of reimplanted monkey teeth with intact cementum and only temporarily in those undergoing cemental repair (Hammarstrom et al.1986). Similarfindingsalso revealed thatperiodontal healing associated with infected root canals filled with calcium hydroxide was not hindered 6 months after experimental periodontal surgical injury in dogs (Holland et al. 1998).

Although calcium hydroxide has been the material choiceforapexification,recentinteresthascentredon mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). MTA has a pH of 12.5 after setting (similar to calcium hydroxide) and has antibacterial properties (Torabinejad et al. 1995). Studies show MTA has a greater consistency than calcium hydroxide in inducing induced hard tissue formation when it used for the repair of perforations in roots, furcations and apexification (Lee et al. 1993; Pitt Ford et al. 1995; Arens & Torabinejad 1996; Shabahang & Torabinejad 2000).

Calciumhydroxideapexificationremainsthemostcommonly used technique for treatment of necrotic teeth with immature apices. However, apical healing takes at least 3-4 months and often requires multiple appointments. Patient compliance problems and the quality of the temporary seal might result in failure or prolonged treatments (Rafter 2005). Single-visitapexificationhasbeensuggested.Therationale is to establish an apical stop which enables therootcanaltobefilledimmediately(Morse et al. 1990). Although MTA has been shown to be superior to calciumhydroxide in apexification,prospective clinical trials and long term studies are required to comparing the techniques.

PhEnol and PhEnol-dErIvatIvEsPhenol and phenol-derivative compounds have bactericidal activity (Menezes et al. 2004). They disrupt bacterial cytoplasmic membranes, denature proteins and inactivate enzymes. They also liberate chlorine, a strong oxidizing agent that inactivates enzymes with sulphydryl groups (Siqueira & de Uzeda 1996). Various formulations of chlorine, phenol and camphor have been used for root canal sterilization. However, because of their toxicity, small amounts have been used, and they have been employed only in the pulp chamber. The assumption had been that the vapours would kill bacteria throughout the root canal system. Spangberg et al (1979) demonstrated that the vapours of camphorated paramonochlorophenol (CMCP) could not kill bacteria. Furthermore,

Page 10 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

Messer and Chen (1984) showed that almost 95% of the CMCP from a cotton pellet placed inside the pulp chamber was lost within 24 hours. The duration of the intracanal medication was short, due to a rapid inactivation process that occurs a fewhours after its exposure to tissue or fluids.CMCP applied alone has shown lower antibacterial activity to calcium hydroxide (Stevens & Grossman 1983; Orstavik & Haapasalo 1990; Menezes et al. 2004).

chlorhExIdInEChlorhexidine is active against a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms as well as yeast, fungi, facultative anaerobes and aerobic microorganisms (Fardal & Turnbull 1986; Cervone et al. 1990; Lindskog et al. 1998). Its efficacy is basedon the interactionbetween thepositive charge of the chlorhexidine molecule and negatively charged phosphate groups on the bacterial cell wall. This increases the permeability of the cell wall, which allows the chlorhexidine molecule to penetrate into the bacteria with intracellular toxic effects (Leonardo et al. 1999). In endodontics, chlorhexidine had been proposed both as an irrigant and an intracanal medicament (Delany et al. 1982; Ohara et al. 1993; Siqueira & de Uzeda 1997; Ferraz et al. 2001). Used as an intracanal medicament in a sustained-release device, it was composed of a crosslinked protein with chlorhexidine gluconate embedded as the active agent (Friedman & Steinberg 1990; Heling et al. 1992a; Heling et al. 1992b).

Chlorhexidine gluconate was found to be an effective antimicrobial agent when used as an irrigation solution and when used as an intercanal antimicrobial dressing, further reducing remaining bacteria within root canal systems (Delany et al. 1982; Gomes et al. 2001; Gomes et al. 2003b). In in vitro studies chlorhexidine also proved better in eliminating bacteria from dentinal tubules than calcium hydroxide, and prevented secondary infection (Heling et al. 1992a; Heling et al. 1992b; Menezes et al 2004)reportedsimilarfindings.

It appears that E. faecalis is susceptible to chlorhexidine (Gomes et al. 2003b). A prolonged application of chlorhexidine proved advantageous, particularly when used in retreatment cases (Komorowski et al. 2000; Gomes et al. 2003a; Siren et al. 2004). Komorowski et al 2000 in an in vitro study reported that the root dentine

after treatment with chlorhexidine could inhibit reinfections of the canal subsequent to treatment.

Itishardertoeliminatebacteriainbiofilmsthaninplanktonic suspension in vitro if the antibacterial agents did not possess any organic tissue dissolving properties (Abdullah et al. 2005). Thus, the strategieswere to treat biofilm infection in rootcanals with mechanical instrumentation, and dissolution of the matrix polymers using irrigation and intracanal medicaments. These procedures might enhance the antibacterial effects by using sodium hypochlorite, iodine or chlorhexidine.

IodInE PotassIuM IodIdE (IkI)IKI is effective against a variety of microorganisms found in root canals, and a 2 % solution had a lower toxicity to tissue culture cells than other intracanal medicaments other than calcium hydroxide (Spångberg et al. 1973; Orstavik & Haapasalo 1990). Iodine is a strong oxidizing agent. It reacts with free sulfhydryl groups of bacterial enzymes, resultingindisulfidelinkages(Siren et al. 2004). The disadvantage of iodine is an allergic reactions in some patients. Safavi et al (1990) reported that IKI eliminated Streptocococcus faecium from infected dentinal tubules in 10 minutes. In contrast, calcium hydroxide took 24 hours. Orstavik and Haapasalo (1990) revealed that IKI was able to penetrate the dentinal tubules to eliminate S. sanguis at a depth greater than 1000 µm within 5 minutes. A clinical study by Peciuliene et al (2001) investigated the ability of single appointment chemomechanical preparation followed by 5 minutes irrigation with IKI to eliminate yeasts, enteric Gram-negative rods and Enterococcus species from the root canals of previously root filled teethwith chronic apicalperiodontitis. Initial microbial sampling showed growth from 82.5% of the teeth with E. faecalis present in 64% of the culture positive teeth; only 1 sample(2.5%)yieldedgrowthfollowingthefinalflushwithIKI.ThestudybyBakeret al (2004) used calcium hydroxide and IKI as intracanal medicaments andfilled the lumenof thebovineincisor roots for the 24 hour period. They found IKI was capable of eliminating E. faecalis when used as a 24 hour medicament. More importantly, IKI had a very high probability of eliminating E. faecalis when the contact time was as short as 15 minutes, which corresponds to the clinical contact time of an endodontic irrigant. In contrast, Safavi et al (1985) found a significantly lower rate ofreinfection due to intervisit microleakages in teeth

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 11

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

whosecanalswerefilledwithcalciumhydroxidecompared to those having a cotton pellet soaked with IKI placed in the pulp chamber.

conclusIon

Currently the recommendation is for teeth with infected root canals to be treated in multiple visits, with placement of an intracanal medicament such as calcium hydroxide to attempt to eradicate all pathogens (Trope et al. 1999). Unfortunately multiple visits entail considerable additional time and expense for both patient and dentist. Unrestoredandtemporaryfilledteetharesubjectto culture reversals – reinfection due to intervisit microleakages (Sundqvist 1992). Ideally, an agent couldbeidentifiedthatwouldavoidthenecessityof placing an intracanal medicament between visits by sterilising the root canal with a contact time of minutes rather than days, allowing immediate obturation and restoration of the tooth.During root canal retreatment of previous endodontic failure cases, calcium hydroxide is not effective against the dominant species (E. faecalis), which may re-colonise the root canal system rapidly between appointments. Various medicaments are available and the choices of usage should be based on the therapeutic properties and the toxicity potential of the material. Although IKI and chlorhexidine have shown greater antibacterial effect than calcium hydroxide, further clinical investigation is required.

rEfErEncEs Abbott PV, Heithersay GS, Hume WR (1988) Release

and diffusion through human tooth roots in vitro of corticosteroid and tetracycline trace molecules from Ledermix paste. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 4, 55-62.

Abbott PV, Hume WR, Heithersay GS (1989a) Effects of combining Ledermix and calcium hydroxide pastes on the diffusion of corticosteroid and tetracycline through human tooth roots in vitro. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 5, 188-92.

Abbott PV, Hume WR, Heithersay GS (1989b) Barriers to diffusion of Ledermix paste in radicular dentine. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 5, 98-104.

Abbott PV (1990a) Medicaments: aids to success in endodontics. Part 1. A review of the literature. Australian Dental Journal 35, 438-48.

Abbott PV (1990b) Medicaments: aids to success in endodontics. Part 2. Clinical recommendations. Australian Dental Journal 35, 491-6.

Abbott PV, Hume WR, Pearman JW (1990) Antibiotics and endodontics. Australian Dental Journal 35, 50-60.

Abbott PV (1992) Systemic release of corticosteroids following intra-dental use. International Endodontic Journal 25, 189-91.

Abdullah M, Ng YL, Gulabivala K, Moles DR, Spratt DA (2005) Susceptibilties of two Enterococcus faecalis phenotypes to root canal medications. Journal of Endodontics 31, 30-6.

Alacam T, Yoldas HO, Gulen O (1998) Dentin penetration of 2 calcium hydroxide combinations. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 86, 469-72.

American Association of Endodontists (2003) Glossary of endodontic terms. Chicago: American Association of Endodontists,

Arens DE, Torabinejad M (1996) Repair of furcal perforations with mineral trioxide aggregate: two case reports. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 82, 84-8.

Baker NE, Liewehr FR, Buxton TB, Joyce AP (2004) Antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide, iodine potassium iodide, betadine, and betadine scrub with and without surfactant against E faecalis in vitro. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodotology 98, 359-64.

Barker BC, Lockett BC (1972) Reaction of dog pulp and periapical tissue to two glucocorticosteroid preparations. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 33, 249-62.

Behnen MJ, West LA, Liewehr FR, Buxton TB, McPherson JC, 3rd (2001) Antimicrobial activity of several calcium hydroxide preparations in root canal dentin. Journal of Endodontics 27, 765-7.

Beltes PG, Pissiotis E, Koulaouzidou E, Kortsaris AH (1997) In vitro release of hydroxyl ions from six types of calcium hydroxide nonsetting pastes. Journal of Endodontics 23, 413-5.

Breault LG, Schuster GS, Billman MA, Hanson BS, 3rd, Kudryk VL, Pashley DH, Runner RR, McPherson JC, 3rd (1995)Theeffectsofintracanalmedicaments,fillers,andsealersontheattachmentofhumangingivalfibroblaststoan exposed dentin surface free of a smear layer. Journal of Periodontology 66, 545-51.

Bryson EC, Levin L, Banchs F, Abbott PV, Trope M (2002) Effect of immediate intracanal placement of Ledermix Paste (R) on healing of replanted dog teeth after extended dry times. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 18, 316-21.

Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1981) Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy ofmechanical root canal instrumentationin endodontic therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 89, 321-8.

Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1983) Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent sodium hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 55, 307-12.

Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1, 170-5.

Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. International Endodontic Journal 18, 35-40.

Camoes IC, Salles MR, Chevitarese O, Gomes GP (2003) InfluenceonpHofvehiclecontainingglycerinusedwithcalcium hydroxide. Dental Traumatology 19, 132-8.

Cervone F, Tronstad L, Hammond B (1990) Antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine in a controlled release delivery system. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 6, 33-6.

Page 12 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR (1992) The role of intracanal medication in root canal treatment. International Endodontic Journal 25, 97-106.

Cohen F, Lasfargues JJ (1988) Quantitative chemical study of root canal preparations with calcium hydroxide. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 4, 108-13.

Cvek M (1972) Treatment of non-vital permanent incisors with calcium hydroxide. I. Follow-up of periapical repair and apical closure of immature roots. Odontologisk Revy 23, 27-44.

Dahlen G, Haapasalo M (1998) Microbiology of apical periodontitis. In: D Orstavik, TR Pitt Ford eds. Essential Endodontology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd, pp. 106-30.

de Deus QD, Han SS (1967) The fate of H3-cortisone applied on the exposed dental pulp. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 24, 404-18.

Delany GM, Patterson SS, Miller CH, Newton CW (1982) The effect of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation on the root canalfloraoffreshlyextractednecroticteeth.Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 53, 518-23.

Ehrmann EH, Messer HH, Adams GG (2003) The relationship of intracanal medicaments to postoperative pain in endodontics. International Endodontic Journal 36, 868-75.

Estrela C (1994) Análise química de pastas de hidóxido de calcio frente à liberacão de ions calcio,de ions hidroxila e formacão de carbonato de calcio na presença de tecido con i untivo de cao São Paulo.

Estrela C, Pesce HF, Sidney GB, Figueiredo JA (1994) Apicalleakageusingvarioussealersandrootcanalfillingtechniques. Brazil Dental Journal 5, 59-63.

Estrela C, Pimenta FC, Ito IY, Bammann LL (1998) In vitro determination of direct antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide. Journal of Endodontics 24, 15-7.

FabriciusL,DahlenG,HolmSE,MollerAJ(1982)Influenceof combinations of oral bacteria on periapical tissues of monkeys. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 90, 200-6.

Fardal O, Turnbull RS (1986) A review of the literature on use of chlorhexidine in dentistry. Journal of the American Dental Association 112, 863-9.

Fauci AS, Dale DC, Balow JE (1976) Glucocorticosteroid therapy: mechanisms of action and clinical considerations. Annals of Internal Medicine 84, 304-15.

Fava LR, Saunders WP (1999) Calcium hydroxide pastes: classification and clinical indications. International Endodontic Journal 32, 257-82.

Ferraz CC, Figueiredo de Almeida Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, de Souza-Filho FJ (2001) In vitro assessment of the antimicrobial action and the mechanical ability of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant. Journal of Endodontics 27, 452-5.

Foreman PC, Barnes IE (1990) Review of calcium hydroxide. International Endodontic Journal 23, 283-97.

Friedman M, Steinberg D (1990) Sustained-release delivery systems for treatment of dental diseases. Pharmaceutical Research 7, 313-7.

Fuss Z, Rafaeloff R, Tagger M, Szajkis S (1996) Intracanal pH changes of calcium hydroxide pastes exposed to carbon dioxide in vitro. Journal of Endodontics 22, 362-4.

Fuss Z, Mizrahi A, Lin S, Cherniak O, Weiss EI (2002) A laboratory study of the effect of calcium hydroxide mixed with iodine or electrophoretically activated copper on bacterial viability in dentinal tubules. International Endodontic Journal 35, 522-6.

Georgopoulou M, Kontakiotis E, Nakou M (1993) In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of calcium hydroxide and paramonochlorophenol on anaerobic bacteria from the root canal. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 9, 249-53.

Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB (1996) Associations of endodontic symptoms and signs with particular combinationsofspecificbacteria.International Endodontic Journal 29, 69-75.

Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ (2001) In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. International Endodontic Journal 34, 424-8.

Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Garrido FD, Rosalen PL, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, de Souza-Filho FJ (2002) Microbial susceptibility to calcium hydroxide pastes and their vehicles. Journal of Endodontics 28, 758-61.

Gomes BP, Sato E, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Zaia AA, Souza-Filho FJ (2003a) Evaluation of time required for recontamination of coronally sealed canals medicated with calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine. International Endodontic Journal 36, 604-9.

Gomes BP, Souza SF, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Zaia AA, Valdrighi L, Souza-Filho FJ (2003b) Effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis in bovine root dentine in vitro. International Endodontic Journal 36, 267-75.

Gordon TM, Ranly DM, Boyan BD (1985) The effects of calcium hydroxide on bovine pulp tissue: variations in pH and calcium concentration. Journal of Endodontics 11, 156-60.

Haapasalo HK, Siren EK, Waltimo TM, Orstavik D, Haapasalo MP (2000) Inactivation of local root canal medicaments by dentine: an in vitro study. International Endodontic Journal 33, 126-31.

Haapasalo M, Orstavik D (1987) In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. Journal of Dental Research 66, 1375-9.

Hammarstrom L, Blomlof L, Feiglin B, Andersson L, Lindskog S (1986) Replantation of teeth and antibiotic treatment. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 2, 51-7.

Hargreaves K, Seltzer S (2002) Pharmacologic control of dental pain. In: K Hargreaves, H Goodis eds. Seltzer and Bender’s Dental pulp. Illinois, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, pp. 216-7.

Heithersay GS (1994) External root resorption. Annual Report of the Australasia Royal College of Dental Surgeons 12, 46-59.

Heling I, PechtM (1991) Efficacy of Ledermix paste ineliminating Staphylococcus aureus from infected dentinal tubules in vitro. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 7, 251-4.

Heling I, Sommer M, Steinberg D, Friedman M, Sela MN (1992a)Microbiological evaluation of the efficacy ofchlorhexidine in a sustained-release device for dentine sterilization. International Endodontic Journal 25, 15-9.

Heling I, Steinberg D, Kenig S, Gavrilovich I, Sela MN, FriedmanM(1992b)Efficacyofasustained-releasedevicecontaining chlorhexidine and Ca(OH)2 in preventing secondary infection of dentinal tubules. International Endodontic Journal 25, 20-4.

Hermann B (1920) Calciumhydroxyd als Mittel Zum Behandel und Füllen von Zahnqurzelkanälen Würzburg.

Hermann B (1930) Dentinbliteration der Wurzelkanäle nach Behandlung mit Calcium. Zahnärtzliche Rundschau 46, 888-99.

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 13

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

Holland R, de Mello W, Nery MJ, Bernabe PF, de Souza V (1977) Reaction of human periapical tissue to pulp extirpationandimmediaterootcanalfillingwithcalciumhydroxide. Journal of Endodontics 3, 63-7.

Holland R, Souza V, Nery M, Mello W, Bernabe P (1979) A histological study of the effect of calcium hydroxide in the treatment of pulpless teeth of dogs. Journal of the British Endodontic Society 12, 1-6.

Holland R, Otoboni Filho JA, Bernabe PF, de Souza V, Nery MJ,Dezan JuniorE (1998)Effect of root canalfillingmaterial and level of surgical injury on periodontal healing in dogs. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 14, 199-205.

Javelet J, Torabinejad M, Bakland LK (1985) Comparison of two pH levels for the induction of apical barriers in immature teeth of monkeys. Journal of Endodontics 11, 375-8.

Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ (1965) The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps In germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 20, 340-9.

Kettering J, Torabinejad M (1998) Microbiology and immunology. In: S Cohen, R Burns eds. Pathways of the pulp. St. Louis, USA: Mosby, pp. 471.

Kim ST, Abbott P (2000) The effects of Ledermix paste as an intracanal medicament on the discolouration of teeth. Australian Dental Journal 26, 86-7.

Kim ST, Abbott PV, McGinley P (2000a) The effects of Ledermix paste on discolouration of mature teeth. International Endodontic Journal 33, 227-32.

Kim ST, Abbott PV, McGinley P (2000b) The effects of Ledermix paste on discolouration of immature teeth. International Endodontic Journal 33, 233-7.

Klotz MD, Gerstein H, Bahn AN (1965) Bacteremia after topical use of prednisolone in infected pulps. Journal of the American Dental Association 71, 871-5.

Komorowski R, Grad H, Wu XY, Friedman S (2000) Antimicrobial substantivity of chlorhexidine-treated bovine root dentin. Journal of Endodontics 26, 315-7.

Kontakiotis E, Nakou M, Georgopoulou M (1995) In vitro study of the indirect action of calcium hydroxide on the anaerobicfloraoftherootcanal.International Endodontic Journal 28, 285-9.

Koppang HS, Koppang R, Solheim T, Aarnes H, Stolen SO (1989)Cellulosefibersfromendodonticpaperpointsasanetiological factor in postendodontic periapical granulomas and cysts. Journal of Endodontics 15, 369-72.

Kwon TY, Fujishima T, Imai Y (2004) FT-Raman spectroscopy of calcium hydroxide medicament in root canals. International Endodontic Journal 37, 489-93.

Lederle Pharmaceuticals (1981) Product pamphlet. Wolfratshausen, Germany. Lederle.

Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M (1993) Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. Journal of Endodontics 19, 541-4.

Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA, Nelson Filho P, Bonifacio KC, Ito IY (1999) In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. Journal of Endodontics 25, 167-71.

Lin S, Levin L, Peled M, Weiss EI, Fuss Z (2003) Reduction of viable bacteria in dentinal tubules treated with clindamycin or tetracycline. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 96, 751-6.

Lin S, Tsesis I, Zukerman O, Weiss EI, Fuss Z (2005) Effect of electrophoretically activated calcium hydroxide on bacterial viability in dentinal tubules--in vitro. Dental

Traumatology 21, 42-5.Lindskog S, Pierce AM, Blomlof L (1998) Chlorhexidine

as a root canalmedicament for treating inflammatorylesions in the periodontal space. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 14, 186-90.

Love RM (1996) Regional variation in root dentinal tubule infection by Streptococcus gordonii. Journal of Endodontics 22, 290-3.

Love RM (2001) Enterococcus faecalis--a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. International Endodontic Journal 34, 399-405.

Martin DM, Crabb HS (1977) Calcium hydroxide in root canal therapy. A review. British Dental Journal 142, 277-83.

MatthewsRW,Peak JD, ScullyC (1994)The efficacy ofmanagement of acute dental pain. British Dental Journal 176, 413-6.

Menezes MM, Valera MC, Jorge AO, Koga-Ito CY, Camargo CH, Mancini MN (2004) In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of irrigants and intracanal medicaments on microorganisms within root canals. International Endodontic Journal 37, 311-9.

Meyer W (1970) Anatomy of root canals, demonstrated on microscopic reconstruction models. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 25, 1064-77.

Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, Kvist T (1998) Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis. International Endodontic Journal 31, 1-7.

Moller AJ (1966) Microbiological examination of root canals and periapical tissues of human teeth. Methodological studies. Odontol Tidskr 74, Suppl:1-380.

Moller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Ohman AE, Heyden G (1981)Influenceonperiapicaltissuesofindigenousoralbacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 89, 475-84.

Morrier JJ, Benay G, Hartmann C, Barsotti O (2003) Antimicrobial activity of Ca(OH)2 dental cements: an in vitro study. Journal of Endodontics 29, 51-4.

MorseDR,O’Larnic J,YesilsoyC (1990)Apexification:review of the literature. Quintessence International 21, 589-98.

Nair PN, Sjogren U, Krey G, Kahnberg KE, Sundqvist G (1990) Intraradicular bacteria and fungi in root-filled,asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a long-term light and electron microscopic follow-up study. Journal of Endodontics 16, 580-8.

Nair PN (1998) New perspectives on radicular cysts: do they heal? International Endodontic Journal 31, 155-60.

Negm MM (2001) Intracanal use of a corticosteroid-antibiotic compound for the management of posttreatment endodontic pain. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 92, 435-9.

Nerwich A, Figdor D, Messer HH (1993) pH changes in root dentin over a 4-week period following root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. Journal of Endodontics 19, 302-6.

Ohara P, Torabinejad M, Kettering JD (1993) Antibacterial effects of various endodontic medicaments on selected anaerobic bacteria. Journal of Endodontics 19, 498-500.

Orstavik D, Haapasalo M (1990) Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 6, 142-9.

Pacios MG, de la Casa ML, de los Angeles Bulacio M, Lopez ME (2003) Calcium hydroxide’s association with different vehicles: In vitro action on some dentinal components. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral

Page 14 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

Radiology and Endodontics 96, 96-101.Pacios MG, de la Casa ML, de Bulacio MA, Lopez ME (2004)

Influence of different vehicles on the pH of calciumhydroxide pastes. Journal of Oral Science 46, 107-11.

Paterson RC (1976) Bacterial contamination and the exposed pulp. British Dental Journal 140, 231-6.

Peciuliene V, Reynaud AH, Balciuniene I, Haapasalo M (2001) Isolationofyeastsandentericbacteriainroot-filledteethwith chronic apical periodontitis. International Endodontic Journal 34, 429-34.

Pierce A, Lindskog S (1987) The effect of an antibiotic/corticosteroid paste on inflammatory root resorption invivo. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 64, 216-20.

Pierce A, Heithersay G, Lindskog S (1988) Evidence for direct inhibition of dentinoclasts by a corticosteroid/antibiotic endodontic paste. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 4, 44-5.

Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Sousa EL, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ (2003) Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teethwith periapical lesions. International Endodontic Journal 36, 1-11.

Pitt Ford TR, Torabinejad M, McKendry DJ, Hong CU, Kariyawasam SP (1995) Use of mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of furcal perforations. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 79, 756-63.

Portenier I, Haapasalo H, Rye A, Waltimo T, Orstavik D, Haapasalo M (2001) Inactivation of root canal medicaments by dentine, hydroxylapatite and bovine serum albumin. International Endodontic Journal 34, 184-8.

RafterM(2005)Apexification:areview.Dental Traumatology 21, 1-8.

Rimmer A (1991) Intracanal medications and antibiotics in the control of interappointmentflare-ups.Quintessence International 22, 997-1005.

Robert GH, Liewehr FR, Buxton TB, McPherson JC, 3rd (2005) Apical diffusion of calcium hydroxide in an in vitro model. Journal of Endodontics 31, 57-60.

Safavi KE, Dowden WE, Introcaso JH, Langeland K (1985) A comparison of antimicrobial effects of calcium hydroxide and iodine-potassium iodide. Journal of Endodontics 11, 454-6.

Safavi KE, Spangberg LS, Langeland K (1990) Root canal dentinal tubule disinfection. Journal of Endodontics 16, 207-10.

Safavi KE, Nichols FC (1993) Effect of calcium hydroxide on bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Journal of Endodontics 19, 76-8.

Schneider DW (1968) Triamcinolone acetonide-demethylchlortetracycline HCl treatment in endodontic practice. Journal of Oral Medicine 23, 51-5.

Seltzer S (2000) Endodontology, design and production in. In: A Sigurdsson, M Trope eds. Pain. Chapel Hill, pp.

Seow WK (1990) The effects of dyadic combinations of endodontic medicaments on microbial growth inhibition. Pediatric Dentistry 12, 292-7.

Shabahang S, Torabinejad M (2000) Treatment of teeth with open apices using mineral trioxide aggregate. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry 12, 315-20; quiz 22.

Siqueira JF, Jr., de Uzeda M (1996) Disinfection by calcium hydroxide pastes of dentinal tubules infected with two obligate and one facultative anaerobic bacteria. Journal of Endodontics 22, 674-6.

Siqueira JF, Jr., De Uzeda M, Fonseca ME (1996) A scanning

electron microscopic evaluation of in vitro dentinal tubules penetration by selected anaerobic bacteria. Journal of Endodontics 22, 308-10.

Siqueira JF, Jr., de Uzeda M (1997) Intracanal medicaments: evaluation of the antibacterial effects of chlorhexidine, metronidazole, and calcium hydroxide associated with three vehicles. Journal of Endodontics 23, 167-9.

Siqueira JF, Jr., deUzedaM (1998) Influence of differentvehicles on the antibacterial effects of calcium hydroxide. Journal of Endodontics 24, 663-5.

Siqueira JF, Jr., Lopes HP (1999) Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. International Endodontic Journal 32, 361-9.

Siqueira JF, Jr. (2002) Endodontic infections: concepts, paradigms, and perspectives. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 94, 281-93.

SiqueiraJF,Jr.(2003)Microbialcausesofendodonticflare-ups. International Endodontic Journal 36, 453-63.

Siren EK, Haapasalo MP, Waltimo TM, Orstavik D (2004) In vitro antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine or iodine potassium iodide on Enterococcus faecalis. Europan Journal Oral Science 112, 326-31.

Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K (1990) Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. Journal of Endodontics 16, 498-504.

Spangberg L, Rutberg M, Rydinge E (1979) Biologic effects of endodontic antimicrobial agents. Journal of Endodontics 5, 166-75.

SpångbergL (1969)Biological effects of root canalfillingmaterials. 7. Reaction of bony tissue to implanted root canalfillingmaterialinguineapigs.Odontologisk Tidskrift 77, 133-59.

Spångberg L, Engstrom B, Langeland K (1973) Biologic effects of dental materials. 3. Toxicity and antimicrobial effect of endodontic antiseptics in vitro. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 36, 856-71.

Spångberg L (1998) Endodontic treatment of teeth without apical periodontitis. In: D Orstavik, TR Pitt Ford eds. Essential Endodontology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd, pp. 225-6.

Stevens RH, Grossman LI (1983) Evaluation of the antimicrobial potential of calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament. Journal of Endodontics 9, 372-4.

Stockdale CR, Chandler NP (1988) The nature of the periapical lesion--a review of 1108 cases. Journal of Dentistry 16, 123-9.

Stuart KG, Miller CH, Brown CE, Jr., Newton CW (1991) The comparative antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 72, 101-4.

Sundqvist G (1976) Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps. (Umeå University Odontological Dissertations No. 7): Umeå University. Umeå, Sweden.

SundqvistG(1992)Ecologyoftherootcanalflora.Journal of Endodontics 18, 427-30.

Sundqvist G (1994) Taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity oftherootcanalflora.Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 78, 522-30.

Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U (1998) Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 85, 86-93.

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 15

Intracanal Medicaments Revisited

Sutter VL, Finegold SM (1976) Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to 23 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 10, 736-52.

Tagger E, Tagger M (1998) Endodontic treatment of primary teeth. In: D Orstavik, TR Pitt Ford eds. Essential Endodontology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd, pp. 309.

Taylor MA, Hume WR, Heithersay GS (1989) Some effects of LedermixpasteandPulpdentpasteonmousefibroblastsand on bacteria in vitro. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 5, 266-73.

Tepel J, Darwisch el Sawaf M, Hoppe W (1994) Reaction of inflamedperiapicaltissuetointracanalmedicamentsandroot canal sealers. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 10, 233-8.

Thong YL, Messer HH, Siar CH, Saw LH (2001) Periodontal response to two intracanal medicaments in replanted monkey incisors. Dental Traumatology 17, 254-9.

Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Pitt Ford TR, Kettering JD (1995) Antibacterialeffectsof some rootendfillingmaterials.

Journal of Endodontics 21, 403-6.Tronstad L, Andreasen JO, Hasselgren G, Kristerson L, Riis

I (1981) pH changes in dental tissues after root canal fillingwithcalciumhydroxide.Journal of Endodontics 7, 17-21.

Tronstad L (1988) Root resorption--etiology, terminology and clinical manifestations. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 4, 241-52.

Trope M (1990) Relationship of intracanal medicaments to endodontic flare-ups. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 6, 226-9.

Trope M, Delano EO, Orstavik D (1999) Endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: single vs. multivisit treatment. Journal of Endodontics 25, 345-50.

Wolfsohn BL (1954) The role of hydrocortisone in the control of apical periodontitis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 7, 314-21.

Wong KS, Sae-Lim V (2002) The effect of intracanal Ledermix on root resorption of delayed-replanted monkey teeth. Dental Traumatology 18, 309-15.

Page 16 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

nEw root canal fIllIng MatErIals

raJnEEsh roy

IntroductIon

Primary aetiological agents of necrotic pulps and apical periodontitis are bacteria and their by-products(Kakehashi et al. 1965). Hence, the primary objectives of endodontics are debridement of the pulpal space, the development of a coronal and apical seal and total obliteration of the root canal system.

The main cause of failure of root canal treatment is persistence of micro organisms after therapy (Molander et al. 1998; Sundqvist et al. 1998) and the effect they have on the periapical tissues.

crItErIa for obturatIon

Sjogren et al (1990), found that after 5 years 94% of cases exhibiting negative cultures at the time of obturation were completely successful. In contrast, only68%ofthecasesfilledwithpositivecultureswere successful after 5 years (Sjogren et al. 1990). The results of this study imply that there was some leakage of bacteria or their by-products through the apical foramenand that therootfillingofgutta-percha did not provide an ideal seal.

It is not practical to use culture techniques routinely. The root canal is considered to be ready forfillingwhen the canal is shaped to anoptimum size, cleaned with appropriate irrigants and medicaments. and can be dried (Bystrom & Sundqvist 1981).

MatErIals usEd In obturatIon

Historically, materials used for root canal obturation have been legion, running the gamut from feathers to orangewood sticks to precious metals(Ingle et al. 2002).

Most materials have been shown to be inadequate and are rejected as impractical or biologically unacceptable.Grossman grouped acceptable materials into plastics, solids, cements and pastes. He also

enumerated requirements for an ideal root canal fillingmaterial.These apply equally tometals,plastics and cements: 1. It should be easily introduced into a root

canal. 2. It should seal the canal laterally as well as

apically. 3. It should not shrink after being inserted. 4. It should be bacteriostatic or at least not

encourage bacterial growth. 5. It should be impervious to moisture. 6. It should be radiopaque. 7. It should not stain tooth structure. 8. It should not irritate periradicular tissue. 9. It should be sterile or easily and quickly

sterilized immediately before insertion.10. It should be removed easily from the root canal

if necessary (Grossman 1982b).

Gutta-percha (GP) is by far the most universally usedsolid-corerootcanalfillingmaterialandmaybeclassifiedasaplastic.

gutta-PErcha (gP)

Gutta-perchahasbeenusedforrootcanalfillingsfor over 100 years. It is a form of rubber obtained from a number of tropical trees. In its pure form it is hard, brittle and less elastic than natural rubber. It is mixed with various other materials to produce a blend, which can be used effectively within the root canal.

Constituents added to GP include zinc oxide and various waxes, colouring agents, antioxidants and metal salts. The proportions vary from brand to brand, thus causing considerable variation in the stiffness, brittleness and tensile strength of commercially available points (Friedman et al. 1977).

Gutta-percha has many advantages. It is:1. Inert.2. Dimensionally stable.3. Non-allergenic.4. Antibacterial.5. Non- staining to dentine.

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 17

New Root Canal Filling Materials

6. Radiopaque.7. Compactable.8. Softened by heat.9. Softened by organic solvents.10. Removable from the canal easily when

necessary.

It has some disadvantages. These are:1. It lacks rigidity.2. It does not adhere to dentine.3. It can be stretched.

Despite these disadvantages, GP is the most widely used material for root canal obturation. The biggest drawback is that it does not adhere to dentine. This leads to movement of bacteria between the canal walls and GP in absence of an adequate coronal seal (Torabinejad et al. 1990), leading to failure of root canal treatment.

MEdIcatEd gutta-PErcha PoInts

In order to overcome some of the problems of GP various additions have been made. New innovations include GP points impregnated with chlorhexidine (CHX) (Activ points, Roeko, Langenau, Germany) and metronidazole. Calcium hydroxide containing gutta-percha points are also available commercially (Roeko calcium hydroxide).

gutta-PErcha PoInts wIth calcIuM hydroxIdERoot canal infections are caused by a polymicrobial florathatincludesfacultativeandobligateanaerobicbacteria (Sundqvist 1994). Although mechanical instrumentation and the use of irrigants like sodium hypochlorite removes the bulk of the bacteria, some bacteria can persist in dentinal tubules and in the smear layer. Thus, intracanal disinfectants like calcium hydroxide are used between appointments, to eliminate bacteria prior to sealing the canal (Sjogren et al. 1991).

Calcium hydroxide pastes have been shown to be appropriate for elimination of bacteria because they exhibit a bactericidal activity. In addition, the constant release of hydroxyl ions inactivates bacterial lipopolysaccharide, thereby reducing the local inflammatory response. It promotes dissolution of remnant necrotic tissue and produces an alkalising osteogenic environment in the surrounding tissues (Podbielski et al. 2000).

The use of impregnated GP points is a convenient way of inserting calcium hydroxide into the instrumented canal. Some studies have demonstrated the applicability and efficacy of these points in comparison to calcium hydroxide paste (Holland et al. 1996). However, the study by Podbielski and colleagues to compare the efficacyofdifferent typesofgutta-perchapointsconsisting of a variety of medicaments (ZnO, CHX, Calcium hydroxide, iodine-polyvinyl pyrrolidine and combinations thereof) on a wide spectrum of endodontic pathogens showed that none possessed an inhibitory activity strong or broad enough to sterilize root canals contaminated with a moderately high number of single pathogens or a mixture of common endodontic pathogens. The authors reiterated the importance of careful mechanical removal of contaminated material and abundant intermittent irrigation for the reduction of bacterial numbers.

Economides and colleagues (1999) designed an in-vitro study to compare the alkalising potential of calcium hydroxide GP points to chemically pure calcium hydroxide mixed with distilled water and Reogan rapid, a non setting preparation of calcium hydroxide. This study found that the GP points with calciumhydroxide showed a significantlylower alkalising potential than the other two. The authors suggested that GP matrix probably binds the hydroxyl ions and blocks their release at the site of application (Economides et al. 1999).

Two subsequent studies also show similar results (Azabal-Arroyo et al. 2002; Ho et al. 2003).

chlorhExIdInE-IMPrEgnatEd

gutta-PErcha PoIntsInfections of untreated root canals with necrotic pulps and apical periodontitis are typically polymicrobial, with approximately equal proportions of Gram-positive and Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria (Sundqvist 1976). However in retreatment cases, the microbialfloraischaracterisedasmonoinfectionsof predominantly Gram-positive micro-organisms, with approximately equal proportions of facultative and obligate anaerobes (Molander et al. 1998; Hancock et al. 2001). Enterococcus faecalis, a facultative Gram-positive coccus, is the most frequently isolated species and may sometimes be the only isolate (Molander et al. 1998; Sundqvist et al. 1998; Hancock et al. 2001).

Page 18 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

New Root Canal Filling Materials

Several studies have shown that E. faecalis is relatively resistant to calcium hydroxide (Bystrom et al. 1985; Haapasalo & Orstavik 1987). Chlorhexidine, a cationic bisguanide with the ability to adsorb onto dentine (Parsons et al. 1980) is considered a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent. It acts by adsorbing onto the bacterial cell wall and causing intracellular component leakage. There is some evidence suggesting the efficacyof chlorhexidine as an irrigant (Delaney et al. 1982; Jeansonne & White 1994) and an intracanal medicament because of its ability to disinfect dentinal tubules against E. faecalis (Heling et al. 1992; Vahdaty et al. 1993). In order to take advantage of this antibacterial property of chlorhexidine, a new formulation of a chlorhexidine-impregnated gutta-percha point, ‘Activ point’ (Roeko, Langenau, Germany), has recently been marketed. According to the manufacturer, ‘activ points’ contains gutta-percha matrix embedded with 5% chlorhexidine diacetate.

Several studies have been undertaken to investigate the antimicrobial activity of ‘activ points’(Podbielski et al. 2000; Lui et al. 2004).

All of these studies concluded that ‘Activ points’ did not possess an inhibitory activity strong enough to completely eliminate a moderately large number of E. faecalis organisms from infected human dentinal tubules.

An in-vitro study conducted by Szep et al in 2002 to test the cellular toxicity of medicated and non-medicated GP points found that chlorhexidine-impregnated GP were the most cytotoxic, as compared to calcium hydroxide impregnated GP points and non-medicated GP points (Szep et al. 2003).

gutta-PErcha PoInts IMPrEgnatEd

wIth MEtronIdazolEAccording to an abstract of a study conducted at Dentistry school of Shandong University in China (Wang et al. 2003), controlled-release delivery gutta-percha points (CDGMC) containing metronidazole compounds were prepared and placed in routinely prepared extracted teeth. The non-drug CDGMC was used as the control. The absorbency of the drugs in normal saline (37 degrees C, ph 7.4) was determined. The percentage

of release and cumulated release of the drugs were calculated according to the concentrations of drugs in medium.

The authors concluded that the CDGMC could continuously release effective drug concentrations for more than 10 days. (This article is in Chinese; only the abstract is available in English. Hence, the details available are quite sketchy).

rEsIlon

Recently, a new product has been introduced to the endodontic marketplace for obturation of root canals. Resilon (Pentron corp., Wallingford, CT, USA) is a thermoplastic, synthetic polymer substituteshown tosealsignificantlybetter thanGP. This obturation system is also available as Real Seal (Sybron Endo, Orange CA, USA). It consists of a core obturation material and a sealer. The core material is available as master cones in all ISO sizes and accessory cones in all sizes, similar to GP. In addition, it is available as pellets, which can beusedforthebackfillinwarmthermoplasticisedtechniques.

At present this obturation system is available under 3 brand names, namely, Resilon, Real Seal and Epiphany. They have all received regulatory clearance from the FDA in the USA.

Chemical compositionResilon is a thermoplastic synthetic resin material based on the polymers of polyester and contains a hydrophilic difunctional methacrylate resin, bioactiveglassandradioopaquefillers,bismuthoxychlorideandbariumsulphate.Theoverallfillercontent is 65%.

The sealer contains UDMA, PEGDMA, EBPADMA and Bis- GMA resins, silane treated barium borosilicate glasses, barium sulphate, silica, calcium hydroxide, bismuth oxychloride with amines, peroxide, photo initiator, stabilizers and pigment and is available as a two paste system. Overallfillercontentis70%byweight.

The primer is a self etch primer, which contains a sulfonic acid terminated functional monomer, HEMA, water and polymerisation initiator.

Handling characteristicsIn virtually all its handling characteristics, Resilon

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 19

New Root Canal Filling Materials

is similar to GP. It can be used with all present forms of endodontic obturation (vertical compaction of warm GP, cold lateral condensation, lateral/vertical combinations) and there is virtually no learning curve to its use. This allows the clinician to use this new technology with only two added steps; clearing the smear layer and placing the self etch primer.Resilon cones are very flexible and pellets areavailable for the Obtura gun (Spartan Obtura, Fenton, MO).

TechniqueMounce and Glassman (Mounce & Glassman 2004) described the following technique for the use of Real Seal in Oral Health, July 2004: Canal preparationCanal preparation protocol is followed as with GP. No alterations are required to facilitate the use of this material.

Smear layer removalSmear layer is the layer of organic and inorganic debris that is created along the walls of canals during instrumentation. Use of 17% EDTA and sodium hypochlorite in an alternating sequence is recommended throughout the entire instrumentation protocol. After the instrumentation is completed, 17%EDTAmaybeusedasafinalcanalrinse.Asan alternative, the authors recommend the use of Smear Clear (Sybron Endo, Orange, CA, USA) as afinalrinse.Thisproductcontainssurfactantsthatenhance wetting of the canal walls and provides optimal smear layer removal. However, neither sodium hypochlorite nor absolute alcohol should be usedasafinalrinseaftersmearlayerisremoved,because sodium hypochlorite will disrupt the sealer bond and absolute alcohol will act as a drying agent. The walls do not need to be fully dry as the sealer is hydrophilic.

Chivian advises the use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconateasthefinalrinse(Chivian2004).

Primer applicationCanals are dried with paper points. Self etch primer is introduced into the coronal third of the canal with a brush or paper point. The primer should be dispersed evenly on the canal walls.

Mixing of the resin sealerThe two components of the sealer may be either hand mixed on a paper pad using a spatula or in mixing tips provided with the dual syringe, which

mixes the two components as they are expressed.Sealer is placed in canal with a master cone or lentulo spiral kept 3 mm from the apex and rotating no faster than 300RPM.

ObturationThecanalisfilledwithResiloncorematerialusingthepreferred technique.When thecorefilling iscompleted, the coronal surface is light cured for 40 seconds to create an immediate coronal seal. The deeper resin sealer then polymerises by chemical curing during the following 30 to 60 minutes.

Post space preparationIf required, post space preparation may be done at thesameappointmentafterthecanalsarefirstfilledtotheleveloftheorifices.Ifanylateral/accessorycanals and/or dentinal tubules have not been sealed during the down pack, perhaps they may besealedduringthebackfill.Ifpostspaceneedsto be prepared after the material has set and the monoblock created, a small amount of chloroform can be used to dissolve the material.

PropertiesThe most important property of Resilon is that it is a synthetic, polymer based composite material. The resin sealer attaches to it as well as to the bonding agent used to penetrate into the dentinal tubules, forming a “monoblock” composed of filling material, resin sealant, bonding agent and dentine. This monoblock does not occur when GP is used as the core material because the sealer, even if resin based, does not bind to GP and tends to pull away from the GP on setting (Teixeira et al. 2004a).

A recent study by Shipper et al (2004) found that a comparison of bacterial leakage through both GP and Resilon over a 30-day period demonstrated that Resilon showed minimal leakage, compared to GP. They used Streptococcus mutans and Enterococcus faecalisforthestudy.Twofillingtechniqueswereused - lateral and vertical condensation.

In the same study, a scanning electron microscope studywasmadeofthedentin-fillinginterfaceofthelongitudinalsectionsfor teethfilledwithGPas well as Resilon. In the GP specimens, there was a uniform gap between the dentine and the filling of approximately 10micrometerswidth.This gap existed mainly between the resin sealer that penetrated the dentine and GP. By comparison, there was no gap between the Resilon material and sealer. High-power scanning electron micrograph

Page 20 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

(SEM)ofadecalcifiedspecimenshowedthattheresin tags had penetrated the dentin (Shipper et al. 2004).

A recent study (Tay et al. 2005) reported that the apical seal achieved by Resilon and Epiphany was no superior to that achieved by GP and AHPlus.

Resilonisquiteflexible.IthandlesandfeelslikeGP. It is easy to use with both cold and heated root canalfillingtechniques.

Resilon has the potential to strengthen roots. A recent in-vitro study found that the resistance to root fracture with Resilon was superior to GP/AH26 sealer (Dentsply Maillefer). In this study theauthorsusedsinglerootedteethfilledwithGPand Resilon and stored them in 100% humidity for 2 weeks prior to subjecting them to forces to determine the point of fracture of the various groups. Thedifferencebetweenthecontrolgroup(unfilled)andgutta-perchafilledgroupwerenotsignificant,buttherewasastatisticallysignificantdifferencebetween Resilon and GP groups. Additionally, not muchdifferencewasnotedbetweendifferentfillingtechniques (lateral and vertical condensation) (Teixeira et al. 2004b). The results however must be interpreted with caution as the results had large standard deviations.

Removal from canalsAccording to the manufacturers, Resilon can be removed from canals quite easily if retreatment is required. It can be dissolved by chloroform.

Biological propertiesSome basic studies have been done on Resilon to test

New Root Canal Filling Materials

its toxicity and mutagenicity. Toxikon Corporation (ISO project no 01-442-G1) performed Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay, which demonstrated that Resilon is non mutagenic. The sealant was evaluated and scored using the skin sensitisation Kligman maximization test (Magnusson & Kligman 1969) and received a gradeIreaction,whichisconsiderednotsignificant(Teixeira et al. 2004a).

In a recent study performed on Beagle dogs (Shipper et al. 2005) an attempt was made to assessandcompareinvivotheefficacyofGPandAH26 versus Resilon with Epiphany primer and sealerfilledrootsinpreventingapicalperiodontitissubsequent to coronal inoculation with oral micro organisms. The results suggested that the Resilon monoblock system was associated with less apical periodontitis, which may be due to its superior resistance to coronal micro leakage.

Resilon is as yet a new material on the endodontic market. There is very little research available on it. Most has been done at the University of North Carolina. More research would be required before conclusively establishing Resilon as superior to GP. However, the initial reports appear to be very encouraging. The studies available to date seem to indicate that it is superior to GP when it comes to creating a seal in the canal.

Its toxicity has been tested. The FDA has approved itforuseasarootcanalfillingmaterial.Accordingto Chivian (2004) a recent survey showed that in thefirst 8months since its introduction, 8%ofthe responding endodontists are using the Resilon Obturating system.

SEM picture of interface between Resilon and Dentin (X650).

SEM picture of interface between Dentin and gutta-percha (X650).

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 21

New Root Canal Filling Materials

root canal sEalErs

Grossman listed 11 requirements and characteristics of a good root canal sealer:

1. It should be tacky when mixed, to provide good adhesion between it and the canal wall when set.

2. It should make a hermetic seal. 3. It should be radiopaque so that it can be

visualised on the radiograph. 4. Theparticlesofpowdershouldbeveryfineso

that they can mix easily with the liquid. 5. It should not shrink upon setting. 6. It should not stain tooth structure. 7. It should be bacteriostatic or at least not

encourage bacterial growth. 8. It should set slowly. 9. Itshouldbeinsolubleintissuefluids.10. It should be tissue tolerant, that is, non-irritating

to tissues.11. It should be soluble in a common solvent if it

isnecessary to remove the root canalfilling(Grossman 1982a).

Requirement 10 might be expanded a little to say that an ideal sealer should not provoke an immune response in periradicular tissues and it should be neither mutagenic nor carcinogenic(Ingle et al. 2002).

Commonly used sealers can be divided into four groups based on their constituents (Regan & Gutmann 2004): 1. Zinc oxide-eugenol sealers – Commercial

products include Tubliseal (Kerr, Romulus, MI, USA), Pulp canal sealer (Kerr) and Roth sealer (Roth, Chicago, USA).

2. Calcium hydroxide sealers – Sealapex (Kerr), Apexit (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein).

3. Resin sealers – AH26, AHPlus (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany).

4. Glass ionomer sealers – Ketac Endo (Espe, Seefeld, Germany).

Inevitably, no single material satisfies the requirements of an ideal sealer but several materials function adequately in clinical practice. However the search is always on for a new material that will improve upon the ones already in use. Some of the new materials being researched are as follows:

glass IonoMEr cEMEnt (gIc) sEalEr wIth an addEd antIMIcrobIal-contaInIng zEolItE (zut)GIC exhibits antimicrobial properties because offluoride release, lowpHvalueswhen settingand the presence of cations such as strontium and zinc(Herrera et al. 2001). Recently, an experimental GIC based root canal sealer (ZUT) has been developed at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, with an emphasis on enhanced antimicrobial properties.

ZUT consists of a GIC base combined with antimicrobial zeolites. A zeolite is a porous ceramic (aluminosilicate) structure that can enclose a core material, which can be either an alkali earth metal ion or organic molecule (e.g., pharmaceuticals). The proportion of the zeolite in the GIC powder can vary, depending on the desired physical properties of the material and the level of antimicrobial dose required (Patel et al. 2000).

These workers conducted a study to compare the antimicrobial effects of ZUT with Ketac Endo. E.faecalis was used as the test organism. Ketac Endo was reported to suppress E. faecalis effectively 24 hours after preparation, but failed to do so 1week later. ZUT formulations showed a strong antimicrobial effect that was sustained much longer.

Thom and coworkers (2003) tested the haemolytic and cytotoxic properties of ZUT and compared themtothoseoftheunmodifiedGICcomponent,Ketac-Endo and two AH26 (with and without silver) formulations. ZUT showed either better or similar cytotoxicity to standard materials currently applied in endodontic practice (Thom et al. 2003).

EndorEz

Recently EndoRez (Ultradent Products, South Jordan, UT, USA) has been introduced to the market. According to the manufacturer, EndoRez is a two part chemical set material containing zinc oxide, barium sulphate, resins and pigments in a matrix of urethane dimethacrylate resin supplied in a mixing and delivery syringe (Zmener & Pameijer 2004).

According to the manufacturer, EndoRez (ER) is biocompatible and has satisfactory sealing properties, hydrophilic characteristics and an

Page 22 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

New Root Canal Filling Materials

easy delivery system. It has been reported by the manufacturer that EndoRez may be used in slightly moist canals because of its hydrophilic property. As it is not possible to obtain a completely dry surface, this characteristic may be advantageous.

ProPErtIEs

BiocompatibilityAccording to studies conducted in-vitro on cell cultures and in rabbits and nonhuman primates, EndoRez proved to be biocompatible when compared to several controls currently in use (ZOE and AHPlus) (Becce & Pameijer 2001). Another study by Louw and coworkers in nonhuman primates also showed it to be biocompatible. This study used histology to study the effects of EndoRez on periradicular tissues (Louw et al. 2001).

In a clinical study conducted by Zmener’s group the performance of ER, used in conjunction with GP was evaluated for up to 24 months in 180 patients. It seemed to be well tolerated by tissues (Zmener & Pameijer 2004).

Sealing propertiesSeveral studies have tried to evaluate the strength of the bond between dentine and ER.

Sevimay and Kalayci (2005) compared the apical sealing ability and adaptation to dentine of ER and AHPlus. AHPlus showed a much lower mean apical leakage value than ER. The difference was statisticallysignificant.SEMexaminationrevealedthat ER sealer showed less penetration than AHPlus in the coronal and middle thirds of canal. In the apical third, penetration into dentinal tubules of ER was not observed and the adaptation to dentinal walls was poorer than that of AHPlus (Sevimay & Kalayci 2005).Eldeniz and coworkers compared the shear bond strength of Diaket, AHPlus and EndoRez to dentin. EndoRez showed the lowest bond strength to dentine of all three and AHPlus showed the highest (Eldeniz et al. 2005).

othEr nEw rEsIn sEalErsKataoka and colleagues (2000) reported having developed an experimental resin sealer composed of70wt%vinylidenefluoride/hexafluoropropylenecopolymer, methyl methacrylate, zirconia and tributylborane catalyst. They evaluated the dentine bonding and sealing ability of this new sealer. They found that it showed good adhesion to both dentine

and GP as compared to the control group (EWT and Sealapex). This product was given the name Endoresin (Kataoka et al. 2000).

Imai and Komabayashi (2002) reported the development of Endoresin-2,whichisamodifiedversion of Endoresin, because of the problem of supply of the fluoropolymer,whichwas a keycomponentofthefirstversion.Theysubstituteditwith polymethylmethacrylate. This team tested the properties of this new material. It was found to have good sealing ability, adhesiveness to dentin, and easy removability (Imai & Komabayashi 2003).

rEfErEncEsAzabal-Arroyo M, Menasalvas-Ruiz G, Martin-Alonso J,

Arroquia JJ, Vega-del Barrio JM (2002) Loss of hydroxyl ions from gutta-percha points with calcium hydroxide in their composition: an in vivo study. Journal of Endodontics 28, 697-8.

Becce C, Pameijer C (2001) SEM study of a new endodontic root canal sealer. J Dent Res 80, 144.

Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1981) Bacteriologic evaluation of theefficacyofmechanicalrootcanalinstrumentationinendodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 89, 321-8.

Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1983) Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent sodium hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 55, 307-12.

Bystrom A, Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. International Endodontic Journal 18, 35-40.

Bystrom A, Sundqvist G, Claesson R (1985) The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1, 170-5.

Chivian N (2004) Resilon--the missing link in sealing the root canal. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 25, 823-4.

Delaney G, Patterson S, Miller C, Newton C (1982) The effect ofchlorhexidinegluconateirrigationontherootcanalfloraof freshly extracred necrotic teeth. Oral Surgery,Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 53, 518-23.

Economides N, Koulaouzidou EA, Beltes P, Kortsaris AH (1999) In vitro release of hydroxyl ions from calcium hydroxide gutta-percha points. Journal of Endodontics 25, 481-2.

Eldeniz A, Erdemir A, Belli S (2005) Shear bond strength of three resin based sealers to dentin with and without the smear layer. Journal of Endodontics 31, 293-5.

Friedman CE, Sandrik JL, Heuer MA, Rapp GW (1977) Composition and physical properties of gutta-percha endodonticfillingmaterials.Journal of Endodontics 3, 304-8.

Grossman L (1982a) Obturation of the root canal. Endodontic Practice, 10th edn; (pp.297). Lea and Febiger.Philadelphia

Grossman L (1982b) Obturation of the root canal. Endodontic Practice, 10th edn; (pp.279). Lea and Febriger.Philadelphia, USA

Haapasalo M, Orstavik D (1987) In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. Journal of Dental

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 23

New Root Canal Filling Materials

Research 66, 1375-9.Hancock HI, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Moiseiwitsch J

(2001) Bacteria isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in a North American population. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 91, 579-86.

Heling I, Sommer M, Steinberg D, Friedman M, Sela MN (1992) Microbiological evaluation of the efficacy of chlorhexidine in a sustained-release device for dentine sterilization. International Endodontic Journal 25, 15-9.

Herrera M, Carrion P, Baca P, Liebana J, Castillo A (2001) In vitro antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements. Microbios 104, 141-8.

Ho CH, Khoo A, Tan R, Teh J, Lim KC, Sae-Lim V (2003) pH changes in root dentin after intracanal placement of improved calcium hydroxide containing gutta-percha points. Journal of Endodontics 29, 4-8.

Holland R, Murata SS, Dezan E, Garlipp O (1996) Apical leakage after root canal filling with an experimental calcium hydroxide gutta-percha point. Journal of Endodontics 22, 71-3.

Imai Y, Komabayashi T (2003) Properties of a new injectable typeofrootcanalfillingresinwithadhesivenesstodentin.Journal of Endodontics 29, 20-3.

Ingle J, Newton C, West J, Gutmann J, Glickman G, Korzon B, Martin H (2002) Obturation of the radicular space. J Ingle, L Bakland eds. Endodontics, 5th edn; (pp.571-668). B C Decker Inc. Ltd.Hamilton Ontario, Canada

Jeansonne MJ, White RR (1994) A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. Journal of Endodontics 20, 276-8.

Kakehashi S, Stanley H, Fitzgerald R (1965) The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 340-9.

Kataoka H, Yoshioka T, Suda H, Imai Y (2000) Dentin bonding and sealing ability of a new root canal resin sealer. Journal of Endodontics 26, 230-5.

Louw N, Pameijer C, Norval G (2001) Histopathological evaluation of root canal sealer in subhuman primates. J Dent Res 80, 654.

Lui JN, Sae-Lim V, Song KP, Chen NN (2004) In vitro antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine-impregnated gutta percha points on Enterococcus faecalis. International Endodontic Journal 37, 105-13.

Magnusson B, Kligman AM (1969) The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 52, 268-76.

Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, Kvist T (1998) Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis. International Endodontic Journal 31, 1-7.

Mounce R, Glassman G (2004) Bonded endodontic obturation: Another quantum leap forward for endodontics. Oral Health.

Parsons G, Patterson S, Miller C, Katz S, Kafrawy A, Newton C (1980) Uptake and release of chlorhexidine by bovine pulp and dentin specimens and their subsequent acquisition of antibacterial properties. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 49, 455-9.

Patel V, Santerre JP, Friedman S (2000) Suppression of bacterial adherence by experimental root canal sealers. Journal of Endodontics 26, 20-4.

Podbielski A, Boeckh C, Haller B (2000) Growth inhibitory activity of gutta-percha points containing root canal

medications on common endodontic bacterial pathogens as determined by an optimized quantitative in vitro assay. Journal of Endodontics 26, 398-403.

Ray HA, Trope M (1995) Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. International Endodontic Journal 28, 12-8.

Regan J, Gutmann J (2004) Preparation of the root canal system. T Pitt Ford ed. Harty’s endodontics in clinical practice, 5th edn; (pp.82). Wright.Edinburgh, UK

Sevimay S, Kalayci A (2005) Evaluation of apical sealing ability and adaptation to dentine of two resin-based sealers. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 32, 105-10.

Shipper G, Orstavik D, Teixeira FB, Trope M (2004) An evaluation ofmicrobial leakage in roots filledwith athermoplasticsyntheticpolymer-basedrootcanalfillingmaterial (Resilon). Journal of Endodontics 30, 342-7.

Shipper G, Teixeira FB, Arnold RR, Trope M (2005) Periapical inflammationaftercoronalmicrobialinoculationofdogroots filled with gutta-percha or Resilon. Journal of Endodontics 31, 91-6.

Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K (1990) Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. Journal of Endodontics 16, 498-504.

Sjogren U, Figdor D, Spangberg L, Sundqvist G (1991) The antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing. International Endodontic Journal 24, 119-25.

Sundqvist G (1976) Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps (Dr. Odont), Univ. Umea,Umea (Sweden).

Sundqvist G (1994) Taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity of therootcanalflora.Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 78, 522-30.

Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U (1998) Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 85, 86-93.

Szep S, Grumann L, Ronge K, Schriever A, Schultze M, Heidemann D (2003) In vitro cytotoxicity of medicated and nonmedicated gutta-percha points in cultures of gingivalfibroblasts.Journal of Endodontics 29, 36-40.

Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Pashley DH, Mak Y-F, Lai C-NS, Raina R, Williams MC (2005) Ultrastructuralevaluationoftheapicalsealinrootsfilledwithapolycaprolactone-basedrootcanalfillingmaterial.Journal of Endodontics 31, 514-18.

Teixeira F, Teixeira E, Thompson J, Leinfelder K, Trope M (2004a) Dentinal bonding reaches the root canal system. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 16, 348-54.

Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson JY, Trope M (2004b) Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a newresinfillingmaterial.[erratumappearsinJAmDentAssoc. 2004 Jul;135(7):868]. Journal of the American Dental Association 135, 646-52.

Thom D, Davies J, Santerre J, Friedman S (2003) The hemolytic and cytotoxic properties of a zeolite-containing rootfillingmaterialinvitro.Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 95, 101-8.

Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD (1990) In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Endodontics 16, 566-9.

Vahdaty A, Pitt Ford T, Wilson R (1993) Efficacy of chlorhexidine in disinfecting dentinal tubules in vitro. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 9, 243-8.

Page 24 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

Wang D, Wang Z, Gao J (2003) The developement and in vitro release rate determination of controlled-release delivery gutta-percha point containing metronidazole compound.(Chinese). Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 21, 361-3.

Zmener O, Pameijer CH (2004) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a resin-based root canal sealer. American Journal of Dentistry 17, 19-22.

New Root Canal Filling Materials

New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006 Page 25

2006 annual gEnEral MEEtIng

frIday 8 sEPtEMbEr 2006

nzda confErEncErydgEs hotEl, auckland

kIngston rooM 2

5:05PM

NOTICE OF MEETING

The New Zealand Society of Endodontics 2006 AGM will be held at Rydges Hotel, Auckland.Electionofofficerswilltakeplacesopleaseforwardnominationsandany items of General Business to Dr. Mike Jameson, Secretary, 2 Granville Terrace, Belleknowes, Dunedin.

Page 26 New Zealand Endodontic Journal Vol 34 July 2006

root-End fIllIng MatErIals:ratIonalE and tIssuE rEsPonsE

bun san chong & thoMas r PItt ford

Endodontic Topics 2005, 11,114-130

coMParatIvE EvaluatIon of EndodontIc IrrIgants agaInst EntErococcus faEcalis bIofIlMs

thoMas r dunavant, John d rEgan, gErald n glIckMan,ErIc s soloMon, allEn l honEyMan

TheaimofthisstudywastocomparetheefficacyofrootcanalirrigantsagainstE.faecalisbiofilms.Biofilmsgrowninaflowcellsystemweresubmergedintestirrigantsforeither1or5minutes.Nostatisticallysignificantrelationshipbetweentimeandpercentagekillwasfound.Thepercentagekillofthebiofilmbacteriawas:6%NaOCl(>99.99%),1%NaOCl(99.78%),SmearClear(78.06%),2%chlorhexidine (60.49%), REDTA (26.99%), and BioPure MTAD (16.08%). Within the parameters ofthisstudy,both1%NaOCland6%NaOClweremoreefficientineliminatingE.faecalisbiofilmthan the other solutions tested. J Endod 2006,32, 527-531

Theneedforaroot-endfillingshouldbedecidedatthetimeofsurgery,afterroot-endresection,whenthereisopportunitytoexaminethequalityoftheexposedrootcanalfillingwithmagnification.Iftheportion of root apex that is inaccessible to instrumentation and consequently a source of infection isremoved,providedtheexposedrootfillingisofagoodqualityandtherearenoadditionalcanalsorcanalextensions,aroot-endfillingisnotnecessary.

Currently,theredoesnotappeartobean‘ideal’rootendfillingmaterialasnonefulfilsallthedesiredrequirements.Althoughthereisinsufficientevidencetospecifyasinglematerialforroot-endfilling,the evidence points to ZOE cements, MTA, Diaket and Retroplast as being acceptable.

surgIcal PrEParatIon: anaEsthEsIa & hEMostasIs

kEnnEth M hargrEavEs & asMa khan

Endodontic Topics 2005, 11, 32-55

Effective intra-operative hemostasisoftenrequirestheslowinfiltrationinjectionofonetotwocartridges of local anaesthetic containing 2% lidocaine with 1 : 50 000 epinephrine and waiting for tissue blanching as a sign of effective vasoconstriction. Excellent surgical skills including carefuldesignofflaps,handlingoftissues,positioningofretractors,etc,toreducetraumatothetissue. Hemostasis in the surgical crypt can be managed by any of several techniques, including resorbable sponges containing epinephrine or direct application of ferric sulfate. A reasonable alternative, particularly for patients at cardiovascular risk, might be the local application of a calcium sulfate paste on the surgical crypt. Good tissue approximation with appropriate suturing techniques combined with 5-10 minutes of wound compression is effective for promoting post-operative hemostasis in otherwise healthy patients.