energy saving partnership berlin - ecologic institute · energy performance contracting for public...

International Conference“Climate protection potential of energy efficiency”

Brussels, 09 November 2011

Susanne Berger, Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Energy Saving Partnership Berlin

Best Practice Examples and Future Developments

09 November 2011 © Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

ESP Berlin –Best Practice and Future Developments

Foundation� in 1992 as Public-Private Partnership

Shareholders� Federal State of Berlin� Vattenfall Europe� GASAG� KfW Banking Group

Disposes of2.5 m € of capital stock

Annual Turnover9.3 m €526 k € Company earnings (EBIT)

Know-how55 members of staff

Energy Services� Contracting� Consulting� International Know-How Transfer

Based in Französische Straße 2310117 BerlinPhone: (030) 29 33 30 - 0e-mail: [email protected]: www.berliner-e-agentur.de

BEA – Facts and Figures

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH



Building owner

ESCO

SupplyElectricity, gas, district heat …)

Building(s)

payment

Saving guarantee

payment coordinationof measures

Building operation Saving service

Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) Principle



Pool 1 Pool 2 Pool 3 Pool 4,Pankow

Pool 5,Hellersdorf

Pool 6,Spandau

Pool 8,HU

Pool 9,Friedrichshain

Liegenschaften 35 45 34 56 36 24 4 30

Baseline-Kostenin €/a

3.948.526 € 5.476.100 € 2.699.279 € 2.074.988 € 1.478.027 € 671.165 € 956.178 € 1.090.529 €

Baseline-Verbrauchin MWh/a

74.810 100.990 52.540 49.512 27.476 17.121 18.031 21.952

Energiesparpartner ARGE ESPBewag / Landis &

Staefa GmbH

SFW GmbH, ESB Energiesparen &

Betreiben

ARGE ESP Landis & Staefa GmbH /

Bewag

Johnson Controls JCI Regelungs-technik GmbH

HEW Contract GmbH


ARGE ESP HUB(Kieback&Peter/edl)

MVV Energie AG(ARGE mit WFM

wurde 2002 aufgelöst)

VertragsbeginnBeginn HauptleistungsphaseDauer der Hauptleistungspflicht

01.04.199601.04.199612,75 Jahre

01.04.199601.04.1996

12,75 Jahre

01.05.199801.10.1998

12 Jahre

12.04.199901.03.2000

14 Jahre

01.07.200001.01.2001

14 Jahre

01.04.200001.02.2001

14 Jahre

01.05.200401.11.2004

8 Jahre

31.01.200101.10.2001

10 Jahre

Dauer der Hauptleistungspflicht 12,75 12,75 12,00 14,00 14,00 14,00 8,00 10,00Erstinvestitionin €

3.118.880 € 3.530.414 € 1.561.997 € 1.771.339 € 2.291.866 € 598.241 € 1.029.000 € 939.243 €

Garantieeinsparungin %

ca. 20% * ca. 25% * 15,70% 24,20% 23,58% 22,00% 23,43% 19,67%

Garantieeinsparungin €

789.705 € 1.369.025 € 423.787 € 502.147 € 348.519 € 147.656 € 224.000 € 214.507 €

CO2-Einsparungin t/a

8.300 5.400 3.000 2.500 1.100 1.000 1.643 925

Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in %

7,54% 9,28% 7,28% 7,10% 6,72% 4,00% 1,52% 3,46%

Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in €/a

297.719 € 508.102 € 196.637 147.325 € 99.328 € 26.873 € 14.560 37.753 €

Zusätzliche Beteiligung des AGin %

ab 20 % Einsparung: 70ab 25 % Einsparung: 60ab 30 % Einsparung: 50

ab 30 % Einsparung: 50

10 80 50 50 80 90

Bedienung / Instandhaltung von Altanlagen durch AN

ja ja ja ja ja ja nein nein

Energy Saving Partnerships =Energy Performance Contracting for public buildings in Berlin

1995 founded - climate protection targets of the State of Berlin

coordination by: BEA + Senat of Berlin, Division Climate protection

Political back-up by severall political parties and parlamentary groupsin the Berlin City Parliament

Energy Saving Partnership Berlin – a Model of Success



Pool 1 Pool 2 Pool 3 Pool 4,Pankow

Pool 5,Hellersdorf

Pool 6,Spandau

Pool 8,HU

Pool 9,Friedrichshain

Liegenschaften 35 45 34 56 36 24 4 30

Baseline-Kostenin €/a

3.948.526 € 5.476.100 € 2.699.279 € 2.074.988 € 1.478.027 € 671.165 € 956.178 € 1.090.529 €

Baseline-Verbrauchin MWh/a

74.810 100.990 52.540 49.512 27.476 17.121 18.031 21.952

Energiesparpartner ARGE ESPBewag / Landis &

Staefa GmbH

SFW GmbH, ESB Energiesparen &

Betreiben

ARGE ESP Landis & Staefa GmbH /

Bewag


HEW Contract GmbH


ARGE ESP HUB(Kieback&Peter/edl)

MVV Energie AG(ARGE mit WFM

wurde 2002 aufgelöst)

VertragsbeginnBeginn HauptleistungsphaseDauer der Hauptleistungspflicht

01.04.199601.04.199612,75 Jahre

01.04.199601.04.1996

12,75 Jahre

01.05.199801.10.1998

12 Jahre

12.04.199901.03.2000

14 Jahre

01.07.200001.01.2001

14 Jahre

01.04.200001.02.2001

14 Jahre

01.05.200401.11.2004

8 Jahre

31.01.200101.10.2001

10 Jahre

Dauer der Hauptleistungspflicht 12,75 12,75 12,00 14,00 14,00 14,00 8,00 10,00Erstinvestitionin €

3.118.880 € 3.530.414 € 1.561.997 € 1.771.339 € 2.291.866 € 598.241 € 1.029.000 € 939.243 €

Garantieeinsparungin %

ca. 20% * ca. 25% * 15,70% 24,20% 23,58% 22,00% 23,43% 19,67%

Garantieeinsparungin €

789.705 € 1.369.025 € 423.787 € 502.147 € 348.519 € 147.656 € 224.000 € 214.507 €

CO2-Einsparungin t/a

8.300 5.400 3.000 2.500 1.100 1.000 1.643 925

Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in %

7,54% 9,28% 7,28% 7,10% 6,72% 4,00% 1,52% 3,46%

Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in €/a

297.719 € 508.102 € 196.637 147.325 € 99.328 € 26.873 € 14.560 37.753 €

Zusätzliche Beteiligung des AGin %

ab 20 % Einsparung: 70ab 25 % Einsparung: 60ab 30 % Einsparung: 50

ab 30 % Einsparung: 50

10 80 50 50 80 90

Bedienung / Instandhaltung von Altanlagen durch AN

ja ja ja ja ja ja nein nein

Number of contracts / pools: 26, about 1,400 buildings

Guaranteed Savings (all contracts): ca. 11,7 Mio. €/aShare of Berlin (Savings on public budgets): ca. 2.7 Mio. €/a

CO2-Reduction around 69,600 t/a

Investments (all pools): ca. 51,6 Mio. €

Energy Saving Partnership – a Model of Success



Client(State, hospital, etc.)

Berliner Energieagentur

Project Manager

Energy Saving PartnerESCO

Assignment

Consultancy

Technical-economic requirements, Negotiations

Energy Saving Guarantee Contract

BEA – Role in Energy Performance Contracting (EPC)



Energy Saving Partnership (ESP) – A Model of Success

A pool of buildings includes e.g.:

Schools and Kindergarten

Universities, Opera

Swimming Pools

Offices and Administration

Implemented Measures:

Refurbishment ofheating, ilumination,automatic control, etc.

Energy Management

User Motivation



� Pool: 69 buildings (schools, kindergarten, gyms)

� Baseline: 1.84 Mio. €/a

� Guaranteed savings: 29,4 % = 541,679 €/a

� Invest: ca. 2.8 Mio. €

� CO2-reduction : 3,973 t/a

� Duration of contract: 14 years

� Measures: new boilers in 11 buildings, switch from coal/heat oil to gas, building automation, modernisation of lighting

� 100,000 € for Renewable energy technologies, e.g. solar thermal systems

ESP Best Practice: Pool 19 District Steglitz-Zehlendorf



ESP Best Practice: Berliner Bäder-Betriebe (Swimming Pools)

� Pool: 11 buildings/swimming pools

� Baseline: 4.9 Mio. €/a ( incl. water costs )

� Guaranteed savings: 33,5 % = 1.6 Mio. €/a

� Invest: 7.9 Mio. €

� CO2-reduction : 4,938 t/a

� Duration of contract: 10 years

� Measures: water saving technology, optimizing filte r flushes, separating water circulations, modernisation of hot water generation

renovation of air conditioning and lighting



Best Practice – Berliner Immobilienmanagement GmbH (Pool 24)

Re-tender after expiration of first ESP contracts ( Pools 1 + 2)

� Pool: 18 office buildings (ca. 300,000 m² GFA)

� Baseline 2007: 2.066 Mio. €/a

� Guaranteed savings: 21 % = 433,757 €/a

� Investment: ca. 2.4 Mio. €

� CO2-reduction: 2,208 t/a

� Duration: 10 years

� Measures (selected): boiler replacement, CHP-unit, optimizing of ventilation systems, renewal of CBCS,

special feature: obligation of maintenance of all old systems

Contracting model - Project example



� Guaranteed energy savings achieved in most contract s, high savings up to 35 % feasible

� 26 contracts operated by 17 different ESCOs, around 100 subcontractors (regional SMEs) involved in implemen tation and maintenance

� Good quality in saving measures because of expertis e of ESCOs, rising experience and improvement of cost effective ness

� Additional improvement of maintenance situation by central coordination through ESCO

� No legal proceedings or need to use the bank guaran tees so far, successful re-tendering of EPC projects leads to lon g-term savings

ESP – Experiences and Results in Berlin

� Success thanks to reliable legal framework, standar dized procedures and contracts together with professional process ma nagement



Future Challenges

� Ambitious climate and energy efficiency targets- Higher EPC savings necessary through comprehensive

measures - Connection to certification / trade systems and monetization

of savings for EPC investments

� Need for decentralization and energy storage- Focus on load management measures and electricity savings - New M&V methods, stronger connection to smart metering

� Technology development- Focus on renewable energy technologies and CHP- EPC as (financing) instrument to create smart buildings (demand

side management)

Challenges to future EPC projects



� EPC plus- Integration of (comprehensive) building refurbishment measures- Shared financing instruments - First EPC with (small) share of construction measures

� EPC light- Operation and energy management of buildings with saving

guarantee - First pilot project, 12 public buildings district of Pankow, Berlin

� Green EPC - Focus on renewable energy technologies- Specific tender objectives and link to subsidy programs- Primary energy consumption as guaranteed element

Perspectives of further EPC models

Advanced EPC



• Model contracts and tender documents (A, D, F, FIN, GR, I, N, S)• Results: 17 new EPC projects kick-started

• Model contracts and tender documents (LV, LT, PL, CZ, SLO, SK, BG, H)• Results: > 10 contracts signed since 2003

Standards set by BEA realised in several other countries

• Improving EPC and energy efficiency standards (2009-11) (B, SE, NO, CZ, SK, SI, RO, A, F)• European Energy Service Award

Clearcontract – Clearinghouse for Energy Contracting in CEE

Clearcontract – European Energy Service Initiative

• Slovenia, Bulgaria, Latvia, Poland, Mexico, Estonia• Ongoing: Chile, Brazil, India, Romania, Serbia, Monaco

EPC Transferred – International Experiences



Conclusions

� EPC is a high potential instrument for future energy challenges

� Successful EPC projects consist in a balance of standard and flexible elements for the customer

� Experienced project facilitators are needed for successful project implementation

� Availability of tools and model contracts in each European country is crucial

� European policy makers need to establish suitable standards and framework for EPC



Thank you for your attentionFor more information:

www.berliner-e-agentur.dewww.european-energy-service-initiative.net

[email protected]

energy saving partnership berlin - ecologic institute · energy performance contracting for public...

Documents