engineering advisory committee meeting

50
1 Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting National Science Foundation October 24-25, 2007 National Science Foundation Directorate for Engineering Richard O. Buckius Assistant Director

Upload: others

Post on 25-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

1

Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

National Science FoundationOctober 24-25, 2007

National Science FoundationDirectorate for Engineering

Richard O. BuckiusAssistant Director

Page 2: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

2

Engineering Advisory Committee Agenda

National TrendsAmerica COMPETESACI

NSF and Engineering TrendsProposal and award trendsENG programs updateSolicitations

Broadening ParticipationResearch TopicsAdvisory Committee Discussion Topics

Page 3: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

3

Engineering Advisory Committee Role of Advisory Committees

Provide advice, recommendations, and oversight of Directorate activities. Assist in assessing the impact on the Directorate’s community of NSF-funded efforts. Advise Directorate on program management, overall program balance, and other aspects of program performance.Facilitate partnerships.

Page 4: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

4

National Trends

Page 5: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

5

America COMPETES

America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education and Science Act was passed in August 2007 by Congress and signed by President Bush.

Education plays a significant role in America COMPETES. Pictured are two students at the University of Texas-El Paso. Zubia, 0521650.

The Act states: “support and promote innovation research in the United States through high-risk, high-reward projects that meet fundamental scientific and technological challenges, involve multidisciplinary work, and involve a high degree of novelty."Outlines specific allocations for initiatives at NASA, NIST, NOAA, DOE, and NSF, with an emphasis on education.

Page 6: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

6

America COMPETES

Authorizes funding that would increase the NSF budget by 20 percent between FY 2007 and FY 2009.

Authorizes $115M for Major Research Instrumentation program in FY 2008 and $123.1M for FY 2009.Calls on NSF to give priority in selecting awards that meet “critical national needs” in innovation, competitiveness, safety and security, physical and natural sciences, technology, engineering, social science and mathematics.

Page 7: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

7

American Competitiveness InitiativeThe centerpiece of American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI) is to double the federal investment in key agencies that support basic research in physical sciences and engineering. Over the next 10 years, the Federal agencies impacted are NSF, DOE Science, and NIST.ACI includes three broad components:

Research in physical sciences and engineering (including 12 specific goals with 7 related to NSF).Research and Development tax incentives.Education and workforce.

Page 8: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

8

American Competitiveness InitiativeFY 2007–FY 2016

Source: OSTP, Feb. 2006

Page 9: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

9

ACI-Driven NSF Budget Projections

$0.00$1.00$2.00$3.00$4.00$5.00$6.00$7.00$8.00$9.00

$10.00$11.00$12.00

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

NSF NSF Projections

FY 2006 through FY 2016 budgets are estimates based on White House data.

Dol

lars

in B

illio

ns

Page 10: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

10

NSF and ENG Trends

Page 11: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

11

7.7%$365.7415.3%$682.44$5,131.69$4,765.95$4,449.25Research & Related Activities

2.8%0.0427.4%0.32$1.49$1.45$1.17U.S. Arctic Research

Commission

13.7%31.6312.7%29.70263.00231.37$233.30IA

6.1%26.8019.0%74.37464.90438.10$390.54OPP

10.8%4.395.6%2.3945.0040.61$42.61OISE

9.6%17.5857.3%72.86200.00182.42$127.14OCI

3.9%8.2410.3%20.78222.00213.76$201.23SBE

8.9%102.7015.3%166.391,253.001,150.30$1,086.61MPS

6.3%47.1512.5%88.05792.00744.85$703.95GEO

6.9%7.5317.5%17.34116.41108.88$99.45SBIR/STTR

9.1%47.2216.6%80.50566.89519.67$486.01ENG (less SBIR/STTR)

9.0%47.3115.6%77.65574.00526.69$496.35CISE

4.1%$25.159.0%$52.10$633.00$607.85$580.90BIO

%Amt%Amt

Change overFY 2007 Request

Change over FY 2006 Actual

FY 2008 Request

FY 2008Request

FY 2007Plan

FY 2006 ActualDirectorate

NSF Budget by Research DirectorateDollars in Millions

Page 12: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

12

PI and Co-PI SubmissionsENG Research Grants

Num

ber o

f PIs

and

Co -

PIs

Subm

ittin

gA

ve rage Num

be r of Pr oposa ls pe r PI and Co-PI0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

FY 2000FY 2001FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006FY 20071

1.05

1.1

1.15

1.2

1.25

1.3

1.35

1.4

1.45

1.5

Number of PIs and CoPIs Average Number of Proposals per PI and CoPI

Page 13: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

13

ENG and NSF Funding RatesResearch Grants

ENG

Pr o

posa

ls a

nd A

war

ds Funding Rate Percent

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007Plan

FY 2008Projection

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

ENG Proposals ENG Awards ENG Funding Rate NSF Funding Rate

Page 14: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

14

Annual Award SizeAverages for ENG Research Grants

Award size data annualized.

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007

Ave

rage

Ann

ual A

war

d Si

ze

$232,000 Ave +• EFRI• NIRT• PFI• NEES Research• HSD

$117,000 Ave +• NER• EXP

$97,700 Ave• Unsolicited• CAREER

ENG NSF

Page 15: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

15

Average Award Duration in YearsENG Research Grants in Comparison to NSF

Ave

rage

Dur

atio

n in

Yea

rs

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007

ENG NSF

Page 16: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

16

ENG Funding AnalysisFenced vs. Constrained vs. Unfenced

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008

Fenced Constrained Unfenced

Page 17: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

17

ENG Research CollaborationsPercent of Single PI vs. Multiple Investigator Awards

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Multi % by $ Single % by $ Single % by # Multi % by #

Page 18: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

18

CybersystemsECCS

CybersystemsScott Midkiff

Supports fundamental research that integrates physical devices with distributed sensing and actuation, communications, storage, computation and control of complex systems that enables visualization, analysis and reconfiguration for reliable and agile infrastructures for domain-specific applications.Two submission windows each year—October 7, 2007 and February 7, 2008. 63 proposals reviewed in FY 2007.Areas supported include: Hybrid and integrative networks, integrated signal processing for high-performance computing and networking, and new algorithms and architectures for secure and robust computing.

Page 19: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

19

Environmental SustainabilityCBET

EnvironmentalSustainabilityBruce Hamilton

EnvironmentalSustainabilityBruce Hamilton

Supports engineering research with the goal of promoting sustainable engineered systems that support human well-being and that also are compatible with sustaining natural (environmental) systems, which provide ecological services vital for human survival.Two submission windows each year—September 15, 2007 and March 1, 2008.48 proposals received in one window in FY 2007.Areas supported include:

Green EngineeringEcological EngineeringIndustrial EcologyEarth Systems EngineeringOther

Page 20: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

20

Energy for SustainabilityCBET

Energy forSustainability

Trung Van Nguyen

Energy forSustainability

Trung Van Nguyen

Supports fundamental research and education in the areas of

Energy production, conversion, and storage, andEnergy sources that are environmentally friendly and renewable.

Two submission windows each year—September 15, 2007 and March 1, 2008.190 proposals reviewed from one window in FY 2007.Areas supported include:

Fuel CellsHydrogen storageBio-relatedOthers – solar-related, renewable energy sources, wind-related

Page 21: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

21

Cyber-Enabled Discovery & Innovation (CDI) Employ advances in computational concepts, methods, models, algorithms, and tools (computational thinking) for revolutionary science and for generating and applying new knowledge.CDI seeks ambitious, transformative, multidisciplinary research proposals within or across the following three thematic areas: • From Data to Knowledge: enhancing human cognition

and generating new knowledge from a wealth of heterogeneous digital data.

• Understanding Complexity in Natural, Built, and Social Systems: deriving fundamental insights on systems comprising multiple interacting elements.

• Building Virtual Organizations: enhancing discovery and innovation by bringing people and resources together across institutional, geographical and cultural boundaries.

Page 22: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

22

Cyber-Enabled Discovery & Innovation (CDI) A competitive CDI proposal will:• Describe an ambitious research and/or education

agenda that, through computational thinking, promises paradigm-shifting advances in more than one field of science or engineering;

• Provide a compelling rationale for how innovations in, and/or innovative use of, computational thinking will yield the desired project outcomes; and

• Draw on productive intellectual partnerships that capitalize upon synergies of knowledge and expertise. These partnerships will cross multiple fields or sub-fields of science or engineering, and/or multiple types of organizations, including academic, for-profit, and not-for-profit entities, both foreign and domestic.

Please note, CDI review criteria are fully compliant with the updated NSF review criteria, which can be found on:http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/in130/in130.jsp

Page 23: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

23

National Nanotechnology InitiativeFunding Opportunities at NSF in FY 2008

www.nsf.gov/nanoNSF supports nanoscale science and engineering in FY 2008 through:

Competitive awards in existing (core) programs, including interdisciplinary team research proposals. Competitive awards via the FY 2008 "Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (CEIN)” solicitation (NSF 07-590). FY 2008 EPA-NSF-DOE research solicitation: "Nanotechnology Research Grants Investigating Fate, Transport, Transformation, and Exposure of Engineered Nanomaterials.”FY 2008 “NSF-SIA/NRI Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Fellow Supplements to NSF Centers in Nanoelectronics” (NSF 07-051).

Page 24: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

24

Recent SolicitationsADVANCE: Increasing the Participation of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers—NSF 07-582, Jan. 7, 2008 ARI: Joint Domestic Nuclear Detection Office/National Science Foundation: Academic Research Initiative— NSF 07-545, first Wednesday in April, annually through 2011.BRIGE: Broadening Participation Research Initiation Grants in Engineering—NSF 07-589, Feb. 8, 2008.CEIN: Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology—NSF 07-590, Prelim. Proposals; March 17, 2008.CDI: Cyber-Enabled Discovery and Innovation—NSF 07-603, Letter of Intent Oct. 30, 2007–Nov. 30, 2007.GOALI: Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry—NSF 07-522.RET and REU (Research Experiences for Teachers, Undergraduates)—NSF 07-557, NSF 07-569, Nov. 19, 2007; August 18, 2008.

Page 25: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

25

ENG Broadening Participation Activities

Page 26: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

26

Engineering Diversity Working Group (EDWG)Representatives from all ENG divisions.Developing a draft plan for broadening participation in ENG.These recommended initiatives and programs focus on all members of the engineering academic community, from K–20 to faculty.

Engineering Diversity GoalsRealize excellence through diversity.Enable the integration and success of a diverse engineering workforce, both inside and outside NSF.Make the demographics of engineering disciplines representative of the US census.

ENG Broadening Participation ENG Diversity Working Group and Goals

Page 27: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

27

ENG Broadening Participation Draft Recommendations – K through Postdoc

K–12: Expand the Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) program significantly and maintain overall success in broadening participation.

Undergraduate: Expand the Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program to include a broadening participation theme.Initiate specific programs to address the needs of each underrepresented group.

Graduate: Develop a broadening participation graduate award that is portable—similar to the Graduate Research Fellowship Program—and encompasses all ENG divisions.

Post-doctoral research: Develop a portable research initiation grant to broaden participation of post-docs in ENG.

Page 28: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

28

ENG Broadening ParticipationBRIGE

Broadening Participation Research Initiation Grants in Engineering (BRIGE)

Research initiation grant funding opportunity intended to increase the diversity of researchers through research program support early in their careers, including under-represented groups, engineers at minority serving institutions, and persons with disabilities.Up to $175,000 over two years.Early career faculty (fewer than three years).Announced in September 2007 with a submission date of February 8, 2008. NSF 07-58 at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf07589/nsf07589.htm

Page 29: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

29

ENG Broadening Participation Draft Recommendations – Faculty

Implement the BRIGE (Broadening Participation Research Initiation Grants in Engineering) program.

Expand the BRIGE to provide funding for a faculty mentor.Initiate a career advancement award to broaden participation of senior faculty and complement the BRIGE program.

Hold broadening participation workshops for department chairs from each of the major ENG disciplines, e.g., chemical, mechanical, electrical, computer, civil, industrial, materials, ...To promote technical collaboration with international scholars, hold periodic international workshops for U.S. women ENG faculty and grad students.Promote collaboration between non-minority- and minority-serving institutions through expanded research-oriented workshops at minority-serving institutions.

Page 30: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

30

Funding rates for research proposals among all ENG, women, and minorities

010002000300040005000600070008000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Num

ber

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Perc

ent

Actions for ENG Actions for Women Actions for M inoritiesENG Funding Rate Women Funding Rate M inority Funding Rate

ENG Broadening Participation Current ENG Activities

Page 31: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

31

0

50

100

150

200

2003 2004 2005 2006 20070%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Awards - Women Actions - Women % Women % ENG

ENG Broadening Participation Current ENG Activities

CAREER funding rates for women and all ENG

Page 32: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

32

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2003 2004 2005 2006 20070%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Awards Actions % Minority % ENG

ENG Broadening Participation Current ENG Activities

CAREER funding rates for minorities and all ENG

Page 33: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

33

ENG Broadening ParticipationENG Proposals from Women and Undeclared Gender

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

< 19

7019

70-1

979

1980

-198

919

90-1

999

2000

-200

7ytd

< 19

7019

70-1

979

1980

-198

919

90-1

999

2000

-200

7ytd

< 19

7019

70-1

979

1980

-198

919

90-1

999

2000

-200

7ytd

< 19

7019

70-1

979

1980

-198

919

90-1

999

2000

-200

7ytd

< 19

7019

70-1

979

1980

-198

919

90-1

999

2000

-200

7ytd

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Number of Proposals

FY/Year of PI Degree

Num

ber o

f Pro

posa

ls

UndeclaredWomen

Page 34: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

34

ENG Broadening ParticipationENG Proposals from Minorities and Undeclared Ethnicity

FY/Year of PI Degree

Num

ber o

f Pro

posa

ls

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450<

1970

1970

-197

919

80-1

989

1990

-199

920

00-2

007y

td<

1970

1970

-197

919

80-1

989

1990

-199

920

00-2

007y

td<

1970

1970

-197

919

80-1

989

1990

-199

920

00-2

007y

td<

1970

1970

-197

919

80-1

989

1990

-199

920

00-2

007y

td<

1970

1970

-197

919

80-1

989

1990

-199

920

00-2

007y

td

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Number of Proposals

MinorityUndeclared

Page 35: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

35

National AverageRET teachers 2001–2003

non-Hispanic white non-Hispanic white

Hispanic Hispanic

African AmericanAfrican American

Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) Includes both sites and supplements.Two supplements per grant allowed if one teacher is disabled, or a minority or a woman.

ENG Broadening Participation Current ENG Activities

Source: Evaluation of the Research Experiences for Teachers Program Final Report, SRI International, NSF Contract Number EEC-9815426, Sept. 30, 2005

2% Asian<1% American Indian

46% women54% men

Page 36: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

36

ENG Broadening Participation Current ENG Activities

Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) supplements to research awards include underrepresented groups.Tribal College activities

Initial award at Oglala Lakota College, South Dakota.Several ENG awardees include local tribal colleges and reservations in outreach.

Graduate Research Supplements (GRS)Supported by all ENG divisions.Provides stipend for an additional Ph.D. student to broaden participation.

Page 37: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

37

ENG Broadening Participation Current ENG Activities

Engineering Research Centers (ERCs)Each ERC is required to craft a diversity plan that includes underrepresented groups. Each ERC is required to collaborate with at least one of the minority-focused programs in the Directorate for Education and Human Resources.Each ERC is required to engage in K–12 outreach.

Page 38: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

38

ENG Broadening Participation Current ENG Activities

Broadening Participation Research Initiation Grants in Engineering (BRIGE).Research-oriented workshops at minority-serving institutions to promote collaboration with other institutions.Numerous divisional workshops and sessions at grantees meetings to explain and promote broadening participation.Proposal-writing workshops for faculty from underrepresented groups.Quality Education for Minorities (QEM) CAREER Faculty Workshop.

Page 39: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

39

Research Topics

Page 40: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

40

Directorate for Engineering Research and Education Topics

To more effectively support fundamental research and education, ENG identifies research and education topics.The topics represent a convergence of fields, disciplines, and frontier opportunities that crosscut divisions, and give general guidance on the potential future directions of engineering research.

Engineering contributes at all scales. Examples are nanotechnology, computational simulation, health, and alternative energy.

Engineering research spans the frontiers

Topic designations will evolve over time, reflecting the maturation of certain fields, the emergence of new fields, and the shift in demand from society for significant progress on grand challenges.

Page 41: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

41

Directorate for Engineering Research and Education Topics

Combining EEG with functional MRI data (left image is EEG, right image shows both) enables precise mapping of brain activity. He, 0411898.

Supports engineering methods and systems for improving understanding of brain and nervous system.Enables research on how to mimic nervous system processes to engineer better systems, machines and technologies.Provides a foundation for competitive innovations—such as intelligent machines that analyze and adapt—called for in ACI.

Cognitive Engineering: Intersection of Engineering and Cognitive Sciences

Page 42: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

42

Directorate for Engineering Research and Education Topics

Nanoparticles compose a lightweight biocompatible material for bone implants (left); or they enhance the efficiency of a flexible solar cell (middle). Nanorods can be layered as a coating (bottom) that reflects almost no light and could potentially increase solar cell efficiency.

Research supports innovation for understanding and thus specifying how materials are made at many scales.Development of efficient systems provides foundation for better delivery of services, such as making health care and health information more accessible.ACI goal for advances in materials science and engineering; and to create world-class capacity in nanomanufacturing.

Groza, 0523063.

Konarka Technologies Inc., 0450532.

Schubert, 0725615.

Competitive Manufacturing and Service Enterprises

Page 43: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

43

Combining maps (gray square) and density of cell-phone usage (shown as red and yellow 3-D peaks) can yield complex system response unplanned events. Dahleh, 0735956 .

Directorate for Engineering Research and Education Topics

Addresses unifying principles that enable modeling, prediction, and control of emergent behavior in complex systems.Impacts specific national research goals, including materials for improving structural performances during natural disasters, overcoming barriers to quantum information processing, and world-leading automation and control technologies.

Complexity in Engineered and Natural Systems

This research enhances our ability to understanding of natural systems, engineered systems, and interface of natural and engineered systems.

Page 44: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

44

Directorate for Engineering Research and Education Topics

Enables breakthroughs essential to harness, efficiently store, and economically distribute energy from alternative sources.Fosters research on materials and methods for assuring a supply of clean water. Advanced water purification and

desalinization begins with a detailed understanding of how ions in water interact with purification membranes. This dynamic computer simulation shows sodium (pink) and chlorine (green) ions inside a polyamide membrane. Shannon, 0120978.

Energy, Water and the Environment

Develops new technologies needed to make energy use more efficient and thus to lessen energy demand.Meets the ACI goal of efficient, economic and sustainable use ofenergy.

Page 45: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

45

Directorate for Engineering Research and Education Topics

Next frontier: create controllable systems built from nanoscale components.Wide application: new materials, petascalecomputing, organ regeneration, biological sensors for health monitoring, high-specificity sensors for national security.Meets the ACI goal for nanomanufacturing, as well as for developing high-end computing capability; overcoming technological barriers to efficient and economic use of energy; and improvement of sensor detection capabilities.

Systems Nanotechnology

Integrated circuits that are smaller and faster are possible with microfluidics systems built from or incorporating nanocomponents. Ferreira, 0328162.

Page 46: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

46

Advisory Committee Discussion

Page 47: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

47

Advisory Committee DiscussionQuestions

EFRI ProcessesShould EFRI repeat topics for more than years (e.g., two consecutive years)? What are pros and cons?Should ERFI have an "open” category where the topic is not pre-specified? What are pros and cons?Do you have any suggestions on improving this mechanism particularly in terms of receiving more EFRI-inspired input from the broader Engineering community?

IPAMMFor ENG, what are the appropriate funding rates and award sizes? What is an appropriate balance?What are the appropriate uses of and approaches to limiting proposal submissions? – by PI, Institution, other… range of limitations based upon institution size, type, ..?

Page 48: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

48

Advisory Committee DiscussionQuestions

Future Engineering TopicsRecognizing the scope of programs in the Directorate for Engineering, are there other frontier topics and/or focused subtopics of these areas that should be emphasized? Are there topics that should not be considered?

University-Industry PartnershipsAre there other themes that the subcommittee should include?

Broadening ParticipationHow can we encourage reviewers to provide demographic data? Please provide feedback on how you think the community could most effectively receive information about broadening participation.

Page 49: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

49

Engineering Advisory Committee Future Meeting Dates

Spring 2008April 24-25, 2008

Fall 2008October 15-16, 2008

Spring 2009April 22-23, 2009

Fall 2009October 14-15, 2009

Page 50: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting

50

Thank you