engineering controls for furniture strippers to meet the new osha pel for methylene chloride cheryl...
TRANSCRIPT
Engineering Controls for Furniture Strippers to Meet the New OSHA PEL for Methylene
Chloride
Cheryl Fairfield Estill, Daniel S. Watkins,
Stanley A. Shulman, Robert W. Kurimo,
Ronald J. Kovein
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Methylene Chloride OSHA PEL
• PEL reduced to 25 ppm
• Action level of 12.5 ppm– exposure monitoring– medical management
• April 10, 2000 – effective date for furniture strippers
Furniture Stripping
• Methylene chloride, methanol, toluene
• One employee
• Alternates between two workstations– stripping, 40% of time– rinsing, 44% of time
Previous Ventilation Design• 1991 study at this facility
• Local exhaust ventilation – strip tank only– two slots, front and back
• Exhaust volume – 2900 cfm
• Employee exposure – 59 ppm
Four Preliminary Surveys
• Survey 1, Aug ‘97 - test existing system,
– unrestricted make-up air
• Survey 2, Mar ‘98 - test existing system,
– no make-up air
• Survey 3, Jun ‘98 - upgrade and clean stripping area ventilation
• Survey 4, Jul ‘98 - add rinsing area ventilation
Results of Preliminary Surveys
334
7339
63
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Survey
Exp
osu
re (
pp
m)
EmployeeExposure (ppm)
Final Survey Ventilation Design• Changes to Stripping Tank
– 60° transition piece
– new fan
– larger ductwork
– eliminated elbows in ductwork
Ventilation Results
• Stripping Tank– exhaust volume 2700 cfm– slot velocity 2600 fpm
• Rinsing Area– exhaust volume 2100 cfm– face velocity 120 fpm
Methods
• Breathing zone samples - one employee• Area samples, stripping and rinsing area• Bulk solution samples• OSHA Method 80 (ORBO tubes)• Two sampling days• 10 - one hour samples
Methods
• Employee Training– Employee watched a one-hour video– Talked with employee about work practices
• Stripping Solution– Height of stripping
solution– Paraffin wax
Results• Stripping solution - 14 inches from top• Paraffin wax was added• Methylene chloride content was 50%
Preliminary Survey 4 Final Survey
Results - Final Survey
0
5
10
15
20
25
BreathingZone
StrippingArea
Rinsing Area
GM MethyleneChloride Conc (ppm)
• Two runs were eliminated.• Geometric mean - 8 ppm• Upper confidence limit - 13 ppm
Comparison of Results
334
7339
8
63
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1st 2nd 3rd 4th Final
Survey
Exp
osu
re (
pp
m)
EmployeeExposure (ppm)
Factors Which Reduced Exposure to Below PEL
• Local ventilation
• Stripping solution height, paraffin wax
• Employee training
Local Ventilation
0500
100015002000250030003500400045005000
Exhaust Volume (cfm)
1st 3rd 4th Final
Survey
StrippingRinsingTotal
Note: No ventilation measurements were taken during Survey 2.
Stripping SolutionEmployee Training
• Solution in the tank must be kept high.
• Paraffin wax must be used in the solution
• Employees must be trained
Costs
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Dollars
Strip Rinse Make-Up
Material Labor
$4545 $4340
$6840
Operating costs of make-up air system - $1000/year
Limitations
• Methylene chloride concentration - 50%• Costs are high• Three factors
– Ventilation– Stripping Solution– Work Practices
• It may take many iterations to reduce exposures to the PEL