engineering law and ethics mississippi state university

Upload: kappanjk7584

Post on 02-Jun-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    1/106

    Engineering Law and Ethics

    Mississippi State University

    http://www.ie.msstate.edu/courses/L&E/

    IE 4553/6553ENGINEERING LAW

    AND ETHICS

    Chapter 1

    THE ENGINEER INMANAGEMENT

    What is an Engineer?

    A Thinker?

    An "Action Figure?"

    An Organizer?

    A Pro!e #o!$er?

    %hat aout "Huan" pro!e&?

    What is a Manager?

    'ua!itie& o( a Manager

    Counication #ki!!&

    Han)!ing Peop!e

    #en&e o( Co&t

    *no+!e)ge o( the ,a+

    http://www.ie.msstate.edu/courses/L&E/http://www.ie.msstate.edu/courses/L&E/
  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    2/106

    Exe!ti"e #!a$ities

    ,ea)er&hip

    -e!egating

    -eci&ion&

    . e!eent& o( Top Manageent -eci&ion&

    -i&cip!ine

    Engineering %r&'ets

    Pro/ect& +e &ee 0 0 0

    Pu!ic Pro/ect&

    Pri$ate Pro/ect&

    Pro/ect& +e )ont u&ua!!2 &ee0 0 0

    Manu(acturing pro/ect&

    %ho& nee)e)?

    %here i& +ork )one?

    Man!(at!ring Engineering

    Conception o( the I)ea

    Fea&ii!it2 #tu)2

    Re)uction to Practice

    P!anning

    3i&ion

    Re(ineent an) O$er&ight

    La) an* Engineers

    Engineers Act as Agents of Owners

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    3/106

    Engineers deal with rights of others

    Engineers responsible for contract documents

    Engineers may be mediators

    . . . therefore, a knowledge of the Law isnecessary!

    Cha+ter ,

    ETHICS

    %hat i& Ethic&?I& Ethic& !earne)?

    %h2 )o Engineer& c!ai a "co)e o( ethic&?"

    What is Ethis?

    Hi&torica!!2 &peaking

    Three Traditional Professions

    The first separate calling --

    o John Smeaton / 1!" / #i$il Engineering

    o %nstitution of #i$il Engineers / 1&1& / 'reat (ritain

    De(initi&n- %R.ESSI.NAL

    %e&ter& -ictionar2) *A calling re+uiring speciali,ed nowledge and

    often long and intensi$e academic preparation.*

    4!ack& ,a+ -ictionar2)*A $ocation or occupation re+uiring specialusually ad$anced education and the labor and sill in$ol$ed...

    La0&r Manage1ent Re$ati&ns At

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    4/106

    *Professional Employee* means) any employee engaged in wor

    o pre)oinate!2 inte!!ectua! an) $arie)5

    o in$o!$ing con&i&tent e6erci&e o( 5

    o o( &uch a character that the output pro)uce)5

    o re7uiring kno+!e)ge o( an a)$ance) t2pe5

    any employee who

    o has completed the courses of speciali,ed intellectual instructionand study described in...

    o is performing related wor under the super$ision of a professionalperson to +ualify himself to become a professional employee as

    defined in paragraph 0a 2abo$e3.

    Plus some re+uirements. . .

    other re+uirements fre+uently added

    o regi&tration re7uireent& (or 5

    o pro(e&&iona! &ociet2 to repre&ent 5

    o pu!ic &er$ice nature o( the occupation8 an)5

    o a)herence to a co)e o( ethic&5

    State Registrati&n La)s

    State laws in each of the states re+uire...

    o -e(ine "right to practice"5

    o Regi&tration in one &tate0 0 0

    o Reciproca! agreeent&

    Primary purpose of state laws

    o te&t

    o oar) o( e6ainer&

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    5/106

    One court decision

    %r&(essi&na$ S&ieties

    Accreditation (oard of Engineering and Technology

    o 19:; < Engineer& Counci! (or Pro(e&&iona! -e$e!opent . enta!it2?

    C&*e &( Ethis

    5E8%4%T%O4

    o %e&ter& -ictionar2 "the )i&cip!ine )ea!ing +ith +hat i&goo) an) a) an) +ith ora! )ut2 an) o!igation0"

    Establishment of 9oral Patterns

    o gro+& out o( the e6perience an) o&er$ation& o( one& !i(e

    #odes of Ethics are guideposts. . .

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    6/106

    La) an* Ethis

    Are unethical practices illegal7

    o (ora! reproo( (ro engineering &ocietie&

    o near!2 a!! eng0 &oc0 are concerne) +ith 0 0 0

    4o A9A or A(A

    Some states do and some states don:t;

    %nformal sanctions can be effecti$e

    People who are honest and loyal in dealing with others . . .

    T)& Areas &( Dis!ssi&n

    'ifts and 8a$ors

    #i$il Action

    #riminal statutes answer ? +uestions. . .

    Physical and 9ental Element to a crime

    Degrees &( a Cri1e

    Treason

    5efine Treason

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    7/106

    8elony

    5efine 8elony

    9isdemeanor

    5efine 9isdemeanor

    T& S!1 it a$$ !+2 2 2

    %hat i& Ethic&?

    I& Ethic& !earne)?

    %h2 )o Engineer& c!ai a "co)e o( ethic&?"

    Cha+ter 3De"e$&+1ent &( the La)

    or

    ",a+& Br &D"

    Wh& nee*s La)s? Alone on a desert island7

    Two people interacting together7

    6hat about the =rban Society7

    5efine *@aw*

    * A set of rules and principles set up by society to restrict the conductand protect the rights of its members.* 0p B1

    eginnings &( the La)

    5i$ine @aws

    o #ode of Cammurabi 2c. B""" (.#.3

    o Ten #ommandments

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    8/106

    #i$il @aw 2Dual Meaning3

    o #ommon @aw

    o @aw of the Twel$e Tables 2c. D!" (.#.3

    En(&re1ent

    Punishment

    o 8ines or %mprisonment

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    9/106

    Stare Decisis -- Abiding by pre$ious decisions

    6hen Fudged decision becomes law injurisdiction 2def ftnote p. BD3

    Cenry (racton:s compilation of all decisions in 25ate73 (lacstone:s #ommentaries 25ate73

    ent:s #ommentaries gi$es def. 2p. BD3

    (usiness #ustom

    o Trade tal *@aw 9erchants* etc.

    #hanges in the law

    O$erruled 5ecisions ha$e what effect7 6hat role do Statutes play in #ommon @aw7

    E!it

    %n the beginning #ommon @aw was administered by

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    10/106

    Thus new courts were #ourts of #hancery

    o To)a28 in o&t &tate& 0 0 0

    o To)a2 in Mi&&i&&ippi 0 0 0

    nu&ua! Ree)ie&

    o Coon ,a+ act& in rem

    o E7uit2 act& in personem

    Temporary %nFuctions 2pendente lite3

    Permanent %nFunctions

    Specific Performance

    eat!res &( E!it

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    11/106

    Courts, Trial Procedure and Evidence

    T+es &( C&!rts Federal Courts

    o The Supreme Court

    o Courts of Appeals

    o District Courts

    State Courts

    e*era$ C&!rts

    The Supree Court

    o Jurisdiction limited to nine categories

    Only cases in$ol$ing ambassadors etc. or to which a state is a

    party may originate in Supreme #ourt

    Appeals come from =.S. #ourts of Appeals or from State Supreme

    #ourts.

    Appeals in$ol$ing the =.S. #onstitution may come from any court

    o Writ of Certiorari- only 5% successful

    o Nine Justices appointed by sitting President

    Courts of ppeals

    o Thirteen eist

    o Three !udges preside

    o "stablished by Congress in #$#

    o Appellate courts only & do not conduct trials

    "istrict Courts ## Trial Courts of Federal Syste

    o #'' ( District Courts

    o No State is )ithout one*

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    12/106

    o Number of Judges depends on No+ of Cases

    o Criteria for Case to be tried ,see p+ ./

    o 0ost cases are 12ederal 3uestions1 or 1Di4ersity Cases1

    o "amples p+ .-5+

    State C&!rts

    $ot unifor throughout states

    Each state has %nal court of appeal

    o Supreme court

    Trial courts of general &urisdictiono Circuit courts etc+

    'arious unicipal courts

    7!ris*iti&n

    (ight or authority

    o 6gi4en by legislature or constitution7

    o to hear and determine causes of action presented to it+

    (elates to

    o geographical region

    o types of cases

    o amount of money or types of relief

    )urisdiction over property

    )urisdiction over persons

    o constructive service

    Liited to types of cases handled

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    13/106

    %retria$ %r&e*!re

    Pleadings

    "iscovery

    o Depositions

    o 8e9uest for Production of Documents

    o :nterrogatories

    Pretrial *otions

    )oining dditional Parties + Clais

    Trial Procedure The )ury

    Courtroo Procedure

    $ew Trial

    o =nfairness

    o PreFudice

    o 9isconduct

    o Error by Fudge

    o PerFury

    o =nforeseen accident

    If motion for new trial unsuccessful

    o ppeal!

    o :n ci4il case -- either party

    o :n criminal case -- only defendant

    o based on 9uestions of the la)

    Euity Suits

    Cases

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    14/106

    E"i*ene

    -sed to prove uestions of fact

    o

    in criminal case -- al)ays assumed by State

    (eal Evidence Testiony

    o 8eal e4idence

    Fudge Fury can see for themsel$es

    o Testimony

    )udicial $otice

    Presuptions

    o Conclusi4e e4idence

    o Prima facie evidence

    "irect and Circustantial Evidence

    /est or Priary Evidence

    0earsay Evidence

    Res gestae

    Parole Evidence (ule

    1pinion Evidence

    2itnesses

    The Engineer as an Ex+ert Witness

    The average witness can3t e4press an opinion

    2hat is an e4pert5

    E4pert ssistance

    o Ad4ice and Consultation

    o Trial Assistance

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    15/106

    o Testimony

    o Depositions

    o Decision to ta;e case

    o 2ees

    Chapter .

    6ntroduction to Contracts

    6ntroduction

    Every transaction we ake is aC1$T(CT

    "e%nition of Contract

    o 4!ack& ,a+ -ictionar2- "an agreeent et+een t+o or ore

    per&on& +hich create& an o!igation to )o or not to )o aparticu!ar thing0

    o CC- *total legal obligation that results from the parties:agreement as affected by applicable law

    "e%nition of greeent

    "the argain o( the partie& in (act a& (oun) in their !anguage

    or 2 ip!ication (ro other circu&tance& inc!u)ing cour&e

    o( )ea!ing or u&age o( tra)e or cour&e o( per(orance5whether an agreement has legal consequences

    is determined by applicable law of contracts.

    Contract # 7an agreeent enforcea8leat law.7

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    16/106

    S1-(CES 1F C1$T(CT L2

    "eveloped in Coon Law

    (estateent of the Law of Contracts

    (estateent 9Second:

    -nifor Coercial Code

    -nited $ations Convention on

    Contracts for the 6nternational Sale of;oods

    ELE*E$TS 1F 'L6"C1$T(CT

    greeent

    o O((er

    O((eror

    O((eree

    o Acceptance

    Copetent Parties Consideration

    Lawful Purpose

    For

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    17/106

    o E6ecutor2 Contract

    o Partia!!2 E6ecute) Contract

    o E6ecute)

    Parties

    o oint8 #e$era! or oint an) #e$era!

    o Thir) Part2 4ene(iciarie&

    *eans of cceptance

    o ni!atera! or 4i!atera! reciproca!

    "i

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    18/106

    o Foral

    Negotia!e In&truent (eature&8 p0 .

    or)er or earer

    )ra+ee

    Proi&&or2 Note

    4i!! o( E6change

    o $egotiation

    o 4earer paper

    o Or)er paper

    o En)or&eent&

    En)or&eent in !ank

    #pecia! en)or&eent

    Re&tricti$e en)or&eent

    o Ho!)er in )ue cour&e

    Chapter

    Partie&

    INANTS Age of :nfancy

    o in(ant J inor

    o eancipate) inor

    Partnership

    Agency

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    19/106

    Disainding Contracts

    o Nece&&itie&?

    Parents? @iability

    0inors? Torts

    .ther %arties 0arried omen

    :nsane Persons

    :ntoicated Persons

    Corporations

    o Organize) un)er &tate !a+&

    o Contracting proce)ure )i((erent

    Ultra-ViresContracts

    o Torts and Crimes of Corporations

    o

    The Corporate Beil

    .ther !siness Entities Sole Proprietorship

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    20/106

    Joint Bentures

    eneral Partnerships

    @imited Partnerships

    .THER %ARTIES B"8N0"NTS

    P82"SS:NA@ P"8SNS

    Respondeat Superior

    o Con&u!tant&

    Chapter E

    A8""0"NT

    Contract Foration 1FFE(

    o -e(inition > "the ani(e&tation o( +i!!ingne&&

    to enter into a argain8 &o a)e a& to /u&ti(2

    another per&on in un)er&tan)ing that hi&

    a&&ent to that argain i& in$ite) an) +i!!

    conc!u)e Kthe argainL0"

    o #poken or +ritten?

    o 6ntent

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    21/106

    Rea&ona!e Man

    Court +i!! con&i)er partie& intention& 0

    o 2hat a8out dvertiseents5

    o Continuing 1

    (eality of greeent

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    22/106

    Let3s talk a8out 7(EL7greeents

    a 7*eeting of the *inds7 assues

    o both parties "know the score"

    o nobody has been prohibited from learning allof the facts

    assuption especially applies to

    o a contract reected by a written and signedinstrument

    2hen is an greeent not

    7(EL57 *istake

    Fraud

    6nnocent *isrepresentation

    "uress

    -ndue 6n?uence. . . Or when ASSE! IS O! O#$!AR%&

    Types of *istakes

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    23/106

    $nilateral 'istake

    a mistake which one party to a contract makesabout the material circumstances surrounding thetransaction

    o RELIEF

    not usually

    o REISSI!"

    one party ay take advantage

    clerical error, atheatical iscalculation

    '$!$A# or (I#A!ERA# 'istakes

    o 2hen is a contract )oidable*

    *istakes a8out identity

    *istakes a8out e4istence

    o 2hen the value is di

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    24/106

    o reliance 8y the in&ured party 9ledto:

    o his or her detrient

    Auestions a8out F(-"

    2hat a8out oission of inforationBor facts not o8viously untrue5

    Euivalent uality5 2hat is a fact5 2hat a8out opinions5 2hat a8out

    7e4pert opinions57

    2hat is fraudulent representation5(eckless disregard of the truth5

    2hat if party doesn3t act on a

    fraudulent stateent5 0ow a8out athird party5

    6f in&ury doesn3t occur5

    Chapter 9 > CON#I-ERATION

    Engineering ,a+ an) Ethic&

    !his is the tie that "inds. . .

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    25/106

    E&&entia!& o( Con&i)eration

    Con&i)eration u&t ha$e $a!ue

    Con&i)eration u&t e !ega!

    Con&i)eration u&t e po&&i!e at the tie the

    contract i& a)e

    Con&i)eration u&t e either pre&ent or (uture

    o Unli#uidated $"ligation

    Seal as onsideration

    o %ncient !imes . . .

    o ow it may "e composed . . .

    o otary seals

    #heories of onsideration

    o 'argain !heory

    %dhesion (ontracts

    o )njurious *eliance !heory

    Estoppel

    o Moral (onsideration !heory

    o"ligation to pay

    Legal Detriment

    o +romisor agrees,to give up some right

    Forbearance

    o +romise to give up a legal right

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    26/106

    $ree%isting Duty

    o (annot use same per-ormance as consideration in another

    contract

    #hapter 1"

    ,a+(u! #u/ect Matter

    *&hen is a contractnot a contract. . . '*

    ,EGA, #4ECT MATTER

    INTRO-CTION

    o 'uaranteed

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    27/106

    o Intentof parties at the timeof the contract.

    INTENT

    o %f both parities intended illegality . . .

    o %f only one party intends . . .

    o 9ost contracts can be perfomed both ways

    o %f one party nows that . . .

    o will not (!ID the contract

    o EGception) =nlawful use in$ol$es heinous crime

    CONTRACT# CONTRAR TO #TATTE OR

    COMMON ,A%

    #ontract may be unlawful if wording either e6pre&&e&or ip!ie&illegality

    o %f a law passes following contract formation

    o After passage. . .

    o Prior to passage . . .

    TPE OF #TATTE

    o @aws passed for protection of public

    o Hoid and unenforceable

    o @aws passed for the raising of re$enue

    o Enforceable 2usually3 subFect to penalties for a$oidance of statute

    o #ourts loo at primary purpose of statute

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    28/106

    HARM TO A THIR- PER#ON

    o %f a ?rd persons would be harmed by a crime or tort in re. contract

    performance

    o contract will be held unlawful

    o #ontract is an inducement to commit a crime or tort but

    o #ommission not necessary to contract perf. . . .

    o #ourts loo at strength of inducement and . . .

    CONTRACT# THAT RE#TRAIN TRA-E

    o #ontracts that create monopolies or main-tain price le$els areunlawful

    o =nder Sherman Antitrust #layton Act S.S.

    o Penalty for $iolation --

    up to triple damages shown

    Payment of #ourt #osts I Plaintiff legal fees

    o Employment #ontracts - 4oncompetition

    o *#o$enants not to compete* are considered restraints of trade

    o Enforceable only to eGtent necessary to protect the legitimatebusiness interests of employer.

    tra)e &ecret&

    goo) +i!!

    CONTRACT# FOR THE #A,E OF A 4#INE##

    o #ourts will protect the purchaser of a business and the *good will*that goes with it.

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    29/106

    o %f restrictions 2see below3 are reasonable courts will upholdrestrictions.

    t2pe o( u&ine&&8 arket area

    tie o( re&triction

    o #ontracts for professional employment

    o 5etail obligations to employer

    con(i)entia!it2

    in$ention&

    Some employers want A@@ in$entions

    Some employers set a time restriction after employment

    o Enforceability of such contracts $ary state-to-state.

    #R

    9ost states ha$e laws limiting the rate of interest

    o 6hen laws are $iolated attitudes $ary state-to-state

    o In &oe &tate&8 court& +i!! not ai) in co!!ection o( principa! or intere&t

    o In &oe &tate& a!! intere&t a& a re&u!t o( u&ur2 a2 e (or(eite)

    o co!!ection o( principa! an) a60 a!!o+0 Int0

    CONTRACT# CONTRAR TO P4,IC

    PO,IC

    #ontracts 2to be lawful and enforceable3 must conform to . . .

    o #ommon law and the applicable statutes

    o 6ritten and unwritten laws of the community

    o 5ifficult because public policy constantly . .

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    30/106

    o 5ef. -- #ontracts that if enforced and encouraged would beinFurious to society in some way

    o 5oes a member of society ha$e to be inFured7

    o

    )E*il #endency) -- unenforceableE$i! Ten)enc2 - contracts in which the Fudgement or decision of publicofficials might be 2or has been3 altered by the contracts.

    Any contract that tends to cause corruption of a public official may be

    sub+ect to censure in the courts. So what about ,o2ing7

    CON-ONE- ACT# OF ,O44ING

    o 6ould impro$e or is harmless to public welfare

    o 9eans used is abo$e reproach

    o 4T #ontingent fees based on outcome of legislation areunlawful.

    FRA- OR -ECEPTION

    o #ontract which has the effect of practicing fraud or deception on athird person is against public policy and $oi).

    o Employment recommendations . . .

    4REACH OF TR#T OR CONFI-ENCE

    o #ontracts that breach a trust or confidential relationship areagainst public policy.

    o will not be supported in court

    o Agency is an eGample

    o agent acts for his principle while . . .

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    31/106

    #ORCE# OF P4,IC PO,IC

    o 8ederal and State #onstitutions

    o Statutes

    o Judicial 5ecisions

    o 5ecisions and Practices of 'o$ernment Agencies

    o #ourt:s sense of moral duty and Fustice

    EFFECT OF I,,EGA,IT ON CONTRACT#o 'enerally no action in law or in e+uity can succeed if it is based

    on an illegal agreement.

    o The 5efense of %llegality is allowed . . .

    a& a )i&ai!it2 to the p!ainti((

    o Public %nterest is the determining factor

    5isaffirmance of an illegal contract while the illegal portion isstill eGecutory allows . .

    Chapter 11

    #TATTE OF FRA-#

    ,&hen a contract needs to be in writing

    INTRO-CTION

    %f an Oral #ontract is generally as binding as a 6ritten #ontract why isa written contract better7

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    32/106

    Terms easier to ascertain

    Establishes relationship

    #ontracts of more than a tri$ial nature . . .

    ENG,I#H #TATTE OF FRA-#

    6hy7

    PerFured testimony on oral agreements

    *An Act for the Pre$ention of 8rauds and PerFuries*

    1K

    9inimum writing re+uired

    See p. 1B 2teGt3

    #ECTION >> CONTRACT# %HICH M#T 4E %RITTEN TO

    4E ENFORCEA4,E

    Promises of eGecutor or administrator

    Promises to act as surety

    Promises based on marriage as consideration

    Promises in$ol$ing real property

    Promises taing more than a year to perform

    Se$enteenth Section -- Sale of goods etc.

    #ontracts will be unenforceable unless following actions taen)

    o Part o( goo)&8 etc08 u&t e accepte) 2 u2er

    o 4u2er u&t pa2 &oe earne&t one2 (or goo)&

    o #oe note or eoran)u o( agreeent u&t e &igne)

    #onsideration) 1" pounds sterling - L!""

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    33/106

    PROMI#E# >> MORE THAN ONE EAR

    @egal %nterpretation of a *year*

    Time limit should be stated - e$en orally

    o %mprobable contracts7

    o #ontracts for *life7*

    o %ncremental additions of time7

    Partial Performance7

    #A,E# OF GOO-#

    =## adopted 1th section and changed wording slightly

    Oral agreement $alid only if

    o Some goods accepted by buyer or

    o (uyer pays part of purchase price in earnest or

    o (uyer signs note or memorandum or

    o Party to be charged admits contract or

    o 'oods specially made

    PROMI#E# OF EECTOR#8 ETC0

    !estator Eecutor and %dministrator

    PROMI#E# TO ACT A# #RET

    +rimaryor SecondaryPromises

    o (ollateralPromise - Oral secondary promise

    o %ndemnity contracts do not ha$e to be in writing. 6hy7

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    34/106

    PROMI#E# IN CON#I-ERATION OF

    MARRIAGE

    9arriage is the highest consideration nown to law

    o an agreement based on marriage settlement

    o or neither is bound

    Oral promises to marry are actionable under common law if. . .

    REA, PROPERT TRAN#ACTION#

    . . .*lands tenements and hereditaments.*

    o Immo*ables -permanently attached to real property

    o E$erything else is MMMMMMMMMMMM property.

    6hat about *natural fruits of the land7*

    o %mmediate remo$al

    EFFECT OF THE #TATTE

    %n some states contracts are $oid if

    o in compliance with Statute of 8rauds 2S of 83

    %n most states contracts not complying with S of 8 are merely $oidable

    o S of 8 operates as a defense to enforcement

    Performance under an oral contract

    o E+uity court enforceable

    #hapter 1B

    THIR->PART RIGHT#

    +ho bene,ts- and who is liable*

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    35/106

    HI#TORICA, E3O,TION

    +rivity o- (ontract - the relationship between the parties to a contract

    o Early English law refused to recogni,e attempts to assign contractrights

    o 6ealth was tangible

    o 4ow wealth is embodied in intangibles

    #ourts recogni,e three eGceptions 2or third-party rights3

    THIR->PART RIGHT# -e(inition0 *ights assigned by a party to a contract are enforceable by

    the third party.

    o

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    36/106

    o Assignment would materially impair . . .

    6hat about rights to personal ser$ices7

    Assignment of rights in nature of trust or confidence7

    RIGHT# AN- -TIE#

    Rightsare assignedN dutiesare delegated.

    o %n absence of obligee:s assent duties 2can cannot3 be freely delegated.

    o One who delegates is still responsible for performance of duties

    "o*ation- rights and duties are effecti$ely transferred -- a 4E6

    contract;

    A##IGNEE# RIGHT#

    %f the obligor has made partial payment to the assignor or has a counterclaimagainst same the right obtained by assignee may be subFect to such claims.

    Assignee may ha$e rights against assignor for a breach of any eGpress orimplied warranties made by the assignor.

    /ratuitous ssignment creates no rights.

    NOTICE

    A debtor cannot be charged with non-payment of a debt if debtorinnocently pays a creditor who has assigned the obligation.

    o "otificationwill mae the assignment legally effecti$e agains debtor.

    o Assignee notifies the obligor

    Subse+uent assignments are unlawful.

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    37/106

    %AGE#

    Assignment of future earnings for a present debt . . .

    o 'o$erned by Statute in most states -- $ary

    o PART 4ENEFICIAR CONTRACT#

    9ost third-party beneficiary contracts do not recei$e uniform treatment

    in all Furisdictions

    Only %nsurance contracts are treated e+uitably across states

    IN#RANCE

    %f insured purchases the insurance then subse+uently dies . . .

    o Third party has right of action

    %f beneficiary purchases insurance. . .

    o must show an insurable interest

    I"S0R"E1 cont.

    o insurable interest in property -- ownership or lien . . .

    %nsurable interest is limited by an economic tie

    o to the amount of economic benefit eGpected

    o or ris of loss eGpected

    Time as factor in insurable interest

    o life ins.- eGists at time insurance contract made

    o property ins. - eGists when loss is suffered

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    38/106

    -ONEE 4ENEFICIAR

    =nsealed promise of future gift is unenforceable by donee as a contract

    "ut

    A donee beneficiary has the right to enforce a contract created to benefitthat person

    CRE-ITOR 4ENEFICIAR

    (lac owes 'ray L!"". 6hite and (lac mae a contract saying 6hite

    will pay 'ray the L!"" owed by (lac.

    o 6ho is the creditor beneficiary7

    o 6ho can she sue7

    INCI-ENTA, 4ENEFICIAR

    6hen contracts indirectly benefit third parties

    o The incidental beneficiary does not necessarily ha$e the right to tae legal

    action

    o 4o legally enforceable interest

    #ontracts in which go$ernment is a party

    o are citi,ens incidental beneficiaries7

    4ew rule reformulates donee creditor and incidental beneficiaries into anew category--

    Inten)e) ene(iciarie&- third party must show that recogni,ing a right toperformance is appropriate to gi$e effect to the parties: intentions and either

    performance will satisfy obligation. . .

    Promisee intended to gi$e third party . . .

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    39/106

    %ARRANTIE#

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    40/106

    o #ommercial 8rustration

    Pre4ention of Performance

    ai4er

    Agreement

    o reach2repudiation3

    o #hoices for other party

    o 5oes not apply to payment of a debt.

    ( OPEan;ruptcy

    o Cistorically America was built by MMMMMMMMMM

    o =.S. #onstitution

    o (anruptcy Act of 1&&

    o (anruptcy

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    41/106

    (anruptcy an;ruptcy

    Chapter ## >an;ruptcy

    0eeting of :nterested Parties

    Chapter E >an;ruptcy

    Chapter # >an;ruptcy

    The "state

    Discharge

    o @ist of debts not dischargable 2p. 1!-1K"3

    o 5ischarge denied for . . .2p. 1K"3

    Creditors? Compositions

    Chapter #. 8emedies

    *ay8e oney isn3t enough5

    :NT8DFCT:N

    (euireents for foration of lawful contract "ischarge of o8ligations under contract

    "e%ned a contract

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    42/106

    Types of 8emedies

    "aages

    (estitution

    Speci%c Perforance

    6n&unction

    (escission

    (eforation

    DA0A"S "ef.# Copensation in oney awarded 8y a court

    to one who has su

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    43/106

    o Attempts to compensate the plainti/ for theplainti/0s actual losses

    !%1ES- 2O'1ESA!OR% 3A'A4ES

    4eneral 3amage

    o 3amages that logically ow from wrongfulconduct or breach

    Special 3amages

    o 3amages resulting from a party0s particular

    circumstances Eemplary 51uniti)e6 3amages

    o 'ore 3amages than "Reasonable2ompensation."

    o 1rimary 1urpose 7 punishing the defendant forreprehensible conduct and addedcompensation for shame- degradation- ormental anguish su/ered by the plainti/

    #i8uidated 3amages

    o 3amages that are a known amount or measure59:;;

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    44/106

    o (ased on plainti/0s good faith parting withconsideration > defendant0s breached duty

    Only restores what is lost or )alue of thing gi)en

    E?$I!A(#E RE'E3IES

    Speci,c 1erformance

    o $ni8ue piece of property in)ol)ed

    In@unction

    o Originally- 1rohibiti)ein nature

    o ow- also 'andatory

    o $sed where irreparable in@ury toproperty is iminent- i.e. )eryprobable.

    EOR2E'E! O RE'E3IES

    +rit of Eecution

    o Addressed to law enforcement authority

    o 4i)es oBcer right to seiCe losers0 property

    4arnishment

    Attachment

    'echanic0s #ien

    2ontempt of 2ourt

    C0PTE( D

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    45/106

    SLES $" 2(($T6ES

    12$E(S06P

    2hats a Sale5

    Can refer to a transfer of personalproperty

    2hats 1wnership5

    sale involves the transfer ofownership

    Then, whats (isk of Loss5

    (isk of Loss can involveTitle 91wnership:

    6nsurance

    $egotiation

    "aage to goods

    Tie of Transfer

    !itle

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    46/106

    2ho ust 6"E$T6F= thegoods5

    /oth parties 98uyer + seller:

    2hen can identi%cationhappen5

    at any tie

    in any anner

    as long as there is eplicit agreement

    "o goods need to 8e in a"EL6'E(/LE C1$"6T61$5

    Generally, title passes in any manner and

    on any conditions explicitly agreed to by

    the parties

    2hat if there is no e4plicitagreeent5

    Title passes to 8uyer at the tie andplace at which the seller copletesperforance re. physical delivery ofgoods.

    Risk of #oss

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    47/106

    2hat if goods are S06PPE"fro seller to 8uyer5

    2hen does risk pass froseller to 8uyer5

    F.1./. # Freight on /oard

    F..S. # Freight a8oard Ship

    C. + F. # Cost and Freight

    C.6.F. # Cost, 6nsurance, + Freight

    Security Interest

    2hats the e

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    48/106

    2hat if the 8uyer cant akeall the payents5

    "efault happens

    "oes seller have rights5

    (epossession

    (esale

    2hat are other types of

    reedies5Court &udgeent, (epo and Lease, ...

    Sale on Appro)al and Sale and

    Return2hats a SLE 1$PP(1'L5

    Letting the 8uyer have the goods for aperiod of tie.

    Title rests with seller

    pproval ay 8e e4press or iplied

    2hats a SLE 1( (ET-($5

    (isks of ownership pass to 8uyer

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    49/106

    (eturn revests title and ownership

    SLES C1$T(CTS

    2hen does a provisioncontrol a contract5

    2hen 8oth parties agree to provision

    2hen 8oth parties dontagree5

    -CC rules 7%lls any gaps7 in partiesagreeent.

    'any agreements under common law

    of contracts would be unenforceable-but would be enf. under the $22.

    2(($T6ES

    2hats a 2(($T=5dded ssurance for 8uyer

    re there di

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    50/106

    E4press 2arranties

    1pinions

    "escription or Saple6plied 2arranties

    "isclaiers

    Epress +arranties

    2hy is a warranty like aproissory note5

    Seller akes a contract siilar toinsurance. . .

    2hats the di

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    51/106

    2hy is an opinion not awarranty5

    2arranty is a stateent of FCT.

    2hat is 2AEA! E'1!OR*

    Latin phrase eaning. . .

    7Let the 8uyer 8eware!7

    *ore responsi8ility is placed on the

    seller

    2hat happens when a sellero

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    52/106

    2hat are the types of6*PL6E" 2(($T6ES5

    ;11" T6TLEF6T$ESS F1( P(ESC(6/E" P-(P1SE

    *E(C0$T/6L6T=

    ;11"S ust at least

    9D: pass without o8&ection.

    9: 8e of fair or average uality

    9G: 8e %t for ordinary purposes

    *E(C0$T/6L6T=, cont.

    9H: 8e of even kind, uality, and uantity withineach unit . . .

    9: adeuately packaged . . .

    9I: confor to proises or . . .

    3isclaimers

    2hat is a "6SCL6*E(5

    Clauses that state that there are nowarranties 9e4press or iplied:, and

    that 8uyer takes goods at 8uyers risk.

    2hat a8out erchanta8ility5

    ny disclaier a8out erchanta8ilityust 8e conspicuous

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    53/106

    0ow do courts construedisclaiers5

    PE(F1(*$CE + /(EC0

    0ow does seller 7tenderdelivery57

    Seller places conforing goods at8uyers disposal...anner, tie, place

    2hat, then, are the 8uyersrights5

    To inspect goods in a reasona8leanner 8efore accepting or paying for

    the.

    6f goods dont confor, whatare the 8uyers options5

    9D:ccept, Pay, then sue at his option

    9: (e&ect entire shipent

    9G: ccept conforing coercialunits and re&ect the rest

    2hat should the 8uyer dothen5

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    54/106

    6nfor seller within a reasona8le tieand give reason

    /-=E(S (E*E"6ES

    6f seller 8reaches thecontract, what can 8uyer do5

    9D:Liuidated "aages clause

    9: 6f contract repudiated,

    a. procure## 5damages would include price toco)er6

    8. seek daages 8ased on . . .

    9G: (ight to (eplevin 9recoverpossession of goods:

    9H: 6f goods are uniue. . .

    6f 8uyer rightfully re&ects orrevokes acceptance..

    /uyer has a security interest and rights are thoseof a secured party

    2hat if goods are non#conforing when delivered5

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    55/106

    "aages ay take for of seto< or deduction froprice to 8e paid

    SELLE(S (E*E"6ES

    2hat are -CC reedies forthe seller5

    9D:2ithholding "elivery

    9: Sellers (esale#hapter 1K

    CONTRACTING PROCE-RE

    %hat )o +e )o a(ter +e &hake han)&?

    PA8T:"S T A CNT8ACT2ho are the parties to a contract5

    TGP"S 2 CNST8FCT:N

    P8:BAT" 8HS

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    56/106

    Def+ - those that are underta;en for an indi4idual or acompany

    Pro=t moti4e is the usual reason for P

    PF>@:C 8HS 0oti4e is public demand or need

    o4erned by statutes

    o to pre4ent d+++ c+++ and f+++ among bidders and bet)eenbidders and public o

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    57/106

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    58/106

    Antagonistic interests of )ner and Contractor

    Changes can be costly

    Fp-front cost to contractor

    reater uncertainty reater spread+++

    CST-P@FS-P"8C"NTA" CST

    Ad4antagesO 0ost rapid means of starting apro!ect ,::/ and most Qeible

    CST-P@FS-P"8C"NTA" CST cont+

    Disad4antagesO 8is;s of construction assumed by +

    C?s pro=t tied to costs so+ + +

    2ed?s don?t li;e this type of contract

    CST-P@FS-2:M"D-2"" CNT8ACT

    Def+-C is paid a =ed fee as pro=tR pic;s up epenses for

    all of contractor?s costs+

    Ad4antagesO

    >est for both parties

    Changes )ould be )orse for C

    Disad4antagesO

    Precludes a timely start+ hyK

    FN:T-P8:C" CNT8ACT

    hat does unit-price includeK

    ho 2igures the 9uantities for FP

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    59/106

    Ad4antagesO 2leible C?s uncertainty isrelie4ed

    Disad4antagesO

    Cannot begin immediately

    has no precise ;no)ledge of cost until termination

    BA8:AT:NS

    :ncenti4e system

    Pro=t-sharing

    8e4erse @i9uidated Damages

    0anagement Contract

    STA"S 2 A P8J"CT

    2easibility StudiesDesign

    @egal Arrangements

    Preparation of Contract Documents

    Ad4ertisement

    :nstructions for >iddersThe Proposal

    Agreement

    STA"S 2 A P8J"CT cont+

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    60/106

    >onds

    >id >ond

    Performance >ond

    @abor and 0aterial Payment >ond

    eneral Conditions

    2inal Considerations

    Collusion

    @o)est 8esponsible >idder

    CNT8ACT8?S CSTS

    Direct @abor

    Fringes

    or;er?s Compensation

    Social Security

    oliday and Bacation Pay

    0edical and @ife :nsurance

    4ertime and shift premiums

    8etirement 2unds

    Stoc;-buying Pro=t-sharing

    Availability and Transportation of Personnel

    0aterials

    Availability and Transportation ofMaterials

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    61/106

    Storage

    isposal and Clean-up

    4erhead Contingencies Pro=tChapter #E

    SP"C:2:CAT:NSEverything you wanted to know, 8ut were afraid to ask!

    INTRO-CTIONSPEC6F6CT61$S

    "efJ "escription of work to 8e done or things to 8epurchased

    o 1ccur in every area of engineering

    o /uilding Construction

    o *achinery and Euipent

    2hy are specs in writing5

    Create a peranent record

    /ecoe part of the contract

    Prevent costly lawsuits 9freuently:

    ssure planning

    /ased on practicality and eKciency

    #PECIFICATION %RITING

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    62/106

    ST=LE

    Should 8e written with great clarity

    P(EC6SE 21("6$;

    2hat if writing were reviewed in court

    (EFE(E$CE SPEC6F6CT61$S

    2hy are they needed5

    ARRANGEMENT

    ;E$E(L P(1'6S61$S

    Schedule of 2ork

    Changes and E4tra 2ork

    o 0ow to pay for E4tra 2ork5

    1ther Suppliers

    "rawings

    ;E$E(L P(1'6S61$S 9Continued:

    o 6nforation ;iven

    o Services Furnished

    o (eceipt and Storage of *aterials

    o 2age (ates

    o Safety

    "ET6L SPEC6F6CT61$S

    o *aterials

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    63/106

    o A2ork Auality

    o r8itrary Speci%cations

    o (elations 8etween 1wnerContr.

    o Eual or 7*asterServant7

    #hapter 1&

    A"NCG%hen 2ou act (or an) repre&ent 2our copan20

    INTRO-CTION

    T=PES 1F /-S6$ESS (ELT61$S06PS

    "mployer-employee relationship

    2Sometimes called 9aster-Ser$ant3

    )ner-independent contractor relationship

    Agency 8elationship

    Principal

    o has right to control conduct of the agent

    Agent

    o has authority to affect the principal:s legal relationship with others

    o) does Agency diLer from the "mployer-"mployee relationshipK

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    64/106

    hat determines )hether the relationshipis "mployer-"mployee or )ner-:ndependent ContractorK

    hy is this importantK

    Are there only t)o parties in an AgencyK

    CREATION OF AGENC

    Agreement %ntent - eGpress or implied

    Power of attorney

    8ati=cation

    Authority is

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    65/106

    bedience

    Care and S;ill

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    66/106

    Fndisclosed Principal

    TERMINATION

    >y @a)

    >y Acts of Parties

    Agency )ith an :nterest

    Notice

    hat about PARTNER#HIP#K

    hat about CORPORATION#K

    Chapter 19

    TANGIBLE PROPERTY

    T=PES 1F P(1PE(T=

    REAL PROPERTY

    Land and anything firmly attached theret

    PER!ONAL PROPERTY all prperty ther than real prperty

    gd"

    chattel"

    choses in action

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    67/106

    mney

    acc#nt" recei$a%le r ther e$idence" fde%t

    PE(S1$L P(1PE(T= CHATTELS& "ynnym#" 'ithPer"nal Prperty

    Chattels Personal in Possession

    tangi%le item"

    Chattels Personal in Action (Choses in

    Action)

    intangi%le right" ari"ing frm a trt rcntract

    patent"( cpyright"( trademar)" *!eeChapter +,-

    AC./I!ITION

    ORIGINAL AC./I!ITION

    cc#pancy

    creatin

    acce""in

    PROCE0/RE O LA2

    2hen a per"n die" 3 3 3

    2hen a mrtgagr defa#lt"3 3 3

    2hen prperty i" "ld t "ati"fy a 4#dgement fthe c#rt3 3 3

    2hen a%andned prperty i" f#nd3 3 3

    2hen prperty f a %an)r#pt indi$id#al i" "ld3 33

    ACT! O OT5ER PER!ON!

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    68/106

    2ill

    Gift

    Cntract *!ee Chapter 16-

    QCnf#"in

    *8ungible 'oods*

    A%andnment( L"t r mi"laid prpertie"

    BAIL7ENT

    A relatin"hip 'hich re"em%le"prperty 'ner"hip

    Re8#irement" f Bailment Title remain" 'ith %ailr

    P""e""in f Prp3 I" cmpletely"#rrendered t Bailee

    Partie" intend ret#rn at end f %ailment

    0#ty f Care

    Primary Cn"ideratin"

    nat#re f prperty in$l$e

    p#rp"e f %ailment

    2hat i" Ordinary Care:

    Bailee;" Right" and 0#tie" *p3 +T/RE!

    Per"nal prperty that %ecme"attached t real prperty

    Generally( 'ner"hip f a fi?t#re ge" t the'ner f the real e"tate3 3 3

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    69/106

    Unless something appears to the contrary

    *Intentin f partie" 'hen the fi?t#re i"attached3-

    (EL P(1PE(T=INTRO0/CTION

    *definitin( re$i"ited-&Land andanything affi?ed firmly theret3

    2hat are the limitatin" t'ner"hip f real prperty:

    E@OL/TION O PROPERTY RIG5T!

    e#dal !y"tem and 2illiam theBa"tard

    Land %elnged t 3 3 3 :

    Parceled #t t Gentry

    2h:

    2hat 5appened at death:

    Replaced 'ith pr$i"in" that 3 3 3

    IN0! O E!TATE!

    REE5OL0 && e"tate f #ndeterminedd#ratin in real prperty

    E"tate in Fee Simple

    Rights of holder in fee simple

    Life E"tate

    Rights of holder of life estate

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    70/106

    Le"" than reehld

    #t#re E"tate

    T($SFE( 1F (EL P(1PE(T=2AY! TO TRAN!ER

    By 2ill r Inheritance

    By !ale

    By Gift

    By Legal Actin

    TRAN!ER BY 2ILL

    2ill( Te"tament( *La"t- 2ill andTe"tament

    Age f te"tatr

    7ental Capacity f te"tatr !#fficient capacity t cmprehend prperty

    Capacity t cn"ider all per"n"3 3 3

    /nder"tanding that he"he i" ma)ing a 'ill

    2h 7ay Inherit:

    Type" f 'ill"

    Ordinary 'ill 'ritten 'ith 'itne""e"

    5lgraphic 'ill"

    N#nc#pati$e 'ill

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    71/106

    2itne""e" *'h( 'hat( 'hen( 'here('hy:-

    E""ential" f a @alid 2ill

    In 'riting

    !igned *%y 'hm and 'here- and "ealed*'here-

    7#"t %e 'itne""ed *e?ceptin:-Te"tatr m#"t "ign in pre"ence f'itne""e"3

    7#"t %e p#%li"hed

    Cdicil" *2hen( 2hat( 2h( Legal"ignificance-

    Pr%ate *2hat( 2hen( 2h( 5'lng-

    TRAN!ER BY 0EE0

    Cn$eying real prp3 By "ale rgift re8#ire"3 3

    ind" f 0eed"

    .#it&Claim

    2arranty

    E""ential" f a 0eed

    Name grantr( grantee( and cn"ideratin

    Prperty de"cri%ed r identified

    2rd" f cn$eyance 'itne""ed( deli$ered(and accepted

    Recrding

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    72/106

    *t ha$e f#ll "tanding at la'( a m#"tD-

    Title !earch

    2hat( 'h( h' far %ac):

    Title In"#rance

    2hy:

    2h "earche":

    O#tcme:

    TRAN!ER BY 7ORTGAGE

    Cntract %et'een mrtgagr*%rr'er- and mrtgagee *lender-

    7rtgage Therie"

    0efea"i%le cn$eyance"

    E8#ity f Redemptin

    Lien Thery

    Title Thery

    rmality *m#"t %e in 'riting"imilar t deed-

    R7rtgagr;" 0#tie"

    aste *'hat( 'hen( 'here( 'hat happen"-

    m#"t pay all ta?e"( a""e""ment"( and

    in"#rance

    m#"t ma)e payment" 'hen they are d#e

    2hat a%#t early payment:

    7rtgagr;" right"

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    73/106

    Rea"na%le #"e f prperty *p3 +9-

    A" lan %alance decrea"e"( right" increa"e*+91-

    prperty may %e 'illed( "ld( r gi$ena'ay *"#%4ect t3 3 3-

    7rtgagee;" right"

    Right" f a""ignment *ntificatin-

    Right t frecl"e3 !eficiency decree

    *2hat( 'h( 'hat happen":-

    TRAN!ER BY LAN0 CONTRACT! /nder Title Thery( re"em%le"

    mrtgage 8#ite cl"ely

    The p#rcha"er( ma)e" d'npayment( then agree" t a "erie" fpayment"3 2hen he red#ce" the%alance %y "me "et am#nt( the"eller 'ill deed the prperty t

    the %#yer and ta)e a fir"tmrtgage3

    Incl#de all payment" d#e immediately if%#yer mi""e" a payment3 n'n a" strictforeclos"re#

    TRAN!ER BY E7INENT 0O7AIN

    *A pri$ate party ha" a

    le""er right t p""e""in and#"e f prperty than de" ap#%lic %dy-

    !metime" )n'n a"condemnation#

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    74/106

    Cmpen"atin i"made accrding t ana""e""ment f the

    mar)et $al#e f theprperty ta)en3

    TRAN!ER BY 0E0ICATION

    2hen 'ner" dnate pri$ate land fr p#%lic #"e3

    N frmality i" re8#ired fr ffer

    2hen an ffer i" e?pre""ly made(it i" #"#ally an"'ered %y e?pre""ed

    acceptance3

    5'e$er( maintenance fp#%lic prperty maycn"tit#te impliedacceptance

    Trt lia%ility ma)e" thedeterminatin f 'h 'n" theprperty $ery imprtant3

    TRAN!ER BY A0@ER!EPO!!E!!ION

    Ad$er"e p""e""inre"#lt" in an entirely ne'title %eing i""#ed*in"tead f 3 3 3-

    #r general re8#irement"

    #.P""e""in m#"t %e pen(ntri#" act#alcc#patin3

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    75/106

    + P""e""in andcc#patin m#"t %e ad$er"et 'ner;" intere"t3

    +7#"t %e cntin##" $er the

    "tat#try perid re8#ired3

    .+7#"t %e claim of rightr color of title%y thep""e""r3

    F1(*S 1F 12$E(S06P

    0IERENT TYPE! O PROPERTY

    O2NER!5IP

    Tr#"t"

    Tr#"tee r Beneficiary

    2h ha" legal title( and'h ha" e8#ita%le title(and 'hat are the"e:

    Right" in Cmmn Partner"hip

    Fint Tenancy

    Tenancy in cmmn

    Tenancy %y the Entiretie"

    Cmm#nity Prperty

    Real Prperty Lea"e"

    Creatin and Characteri"tic"

    Le""r and Le""ee( rLandlrd and Tenant

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    76/106

    Right" t #"eand en4yment area%#t the "ame a"that f'ner"hip3

    Pr$i"in" f Lea"e cntract %indthe partie"

    2hat a%#t OralPrmi"e":

    C$enant" e?pre""ed inlea"e agreement 'ill %eadhered t in c#rtinterpretatin

    Tie liits5 0efiniteperid f time mnth tmnth( etc3 tenancy at'ill and tenancy at"#fferance3

    o Tenant;" right" may %e a""igned t ther"(#nle"" 3 3 3

    o Landlrd;" Right"

    cmpen"atin

    cme peacea%ly n premi"e"t cllect rent 'hen it i" d#e

    E@ICTION

    may %ring an actin fr'a"te again"t the tenant

    ha" right t pre$ent third

    partie" frm in4#ring prpertyr3 3 3

    Tenant;" Right"

    right t prperty freefrm interference %ylandlrd3

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    77/106

    Right tapp#rtenance" nthe prperty("#ch a"%#ilding"3

    Impr$ement" n theprperty:

    Lia8ility ##Tenant, usuallyB8ut what a8outtenant3s in&uries5

    Ta?e" and a""e""ment"again"t the prperty:

    0IERENT TYPE! OPROPERTY O2NER!5IP

    EA!E7ENT!

    2ATER RIG5T! *RIPARIAN RIG5T!-

    /N0ERGRO/N0 2ATER

    PRIOR APPROPRIATION

    #hapter B"

    %4TE@@E#T=A@ P

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    78/106

    Engineers and %n$ention

    The Patent

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    79/106

    ASS%'49E4T 2#ont.3

    Shop

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    80/106

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    81/106

    @icensing and 8ranchising

    #OP

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    82/106

    9easures of Actual 5amages

    Plaintiff:s Actual @osses

    5efendant:s Profits

    A reasonable royalty

    Chapter 21

    COMMON TORTS

    NEGLIGENCE

    Most torts based on NegligenceDefinition

    The o!ission to do so!ething "hich a reasonable !an# g$ided

    b% those ordinar% considerations# "hich ordinaril% reg$late

    h$!an affairs# "o$ld do&

    'laintiff needs to pro(e& & &

    The e)istence of d$t%

    a breach of that d$t%

    a sho"ing that the breach ca$sed in*$r%

    da!ages d$e to in*$r%&

    Legal D$t% + I!portant ,actors

    ,oreseeabilit% of in*$r%

    -cti(e or 'assi(e Cond$ct

    Reasonable Care

    Ser(ices necessar% for protection

    E)istence of Contract$al Obligations

    Standard of Care

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    83/106

    De(eloped $nder Co!!on La"

    Degree of care e)ercised b% a

    Reasonabl% 'r$dent 'erson

    Nor!al Intelligence

    Me!or%

    Capacit%

    S.ill

    Modifications in appropriate sit$ations

    See p&/02# col& 2# last paragraph

    'ro)i!ate Ca$se

    M$st be a s$bstantial ,actor in In*$r%

    Ca$se in ,act

    b$t for& & & standard

    Legal Ca$sation

    depends on the connection bet"een ca$se and effect&

    NEGLIGENCE + Cont&

    Res Ipsa Lo3$it$r

    The thing spea.s for itself

    'laintiff !$st sho" N& and that Defendant had control of the

    instr$!entalit% ca$sing in*$r% and that 'laintiff in no "a%

    contrib$tes to in*$r%&

    Defense $s$all% consists of sho"ing that he or she did e)ercise

    the re3$isite care&

    Gross Negligence

    Rec.less Disregard for conse3$ences

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    84/106

    '$niti(e Da!ages

    Negligence Defenses

    -ss$!ption of Ris.

    Contrib$tor% Negligence

    Co!parati(e Negligence

    TORTS -G-INST - 'ERSON

    -ssa$lt

    Threat of 4iolence

    5atter%

    Intentional and $nla"f$l to$ching

    ,alse I!prison!ent

    Malicio$s 'rosec$tion

    -b$se of 'rocess

    TORTS -G-INST RE'6T-TION

    Defa!ation

    Slander + oral defa!ation

    Libel + "ritten defa!ation

    Defenses

    Tr$th + no defa!ation

    'ri(ilege

    Co!!on La" + strict liabilit%

    1st -!end!ent

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    85/106

    're(ents Strict Liabilit% "hen s$b*ect is a p$blic fig$re or spea.er is a !edia

    person

    TORTS -G-INST 'RO'ERT7Trespass

    Repeated

    8ho controls the propert% incl$ding renters

    'ersonal rights ta.e precedence o(er propert% rights&

    Trespass E)ceptions + Co!!on La" in(ol(ed no

    finding of intent or Negligence

    Ease!ent or License

    -ttracti(e N$isance

    Con(ersion

    Tort Co$nterpart to the cri!e of theft

    8rongf$l retention of another9s personal propert%

    8rongf$l alteration and "rongf$l $se of propert% b% persons

    other than the o"ner&

    Con(ersion !a% arise in instances of 5ail!ent

    Re!edies

    S$e on tort of con(ersion

    Maintain an action in reple(into regain propert%

    TORTS -G-INST ECONOMIC RIG:TS

    Co$rts tend to enco$rage efficience lo"er cons$!er

    prices e)cept in cases of ;;;;&

    ,ra$d

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    86/106

    Ele!ents of ,ra$d

    Negligent Misrepresentation a tort

    Ind$cing 5reach of Contract

    tortio$s interference

    ,alse -d(ertising

    6nder Co!!on La" + -ction for ,ra$d

    ,TC + See.s to pre(ent decepti(e ad(ertising

    Lanha! -ct trade!ar. st$ff# re!e!ber

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    87/106

    ?$stification e)ists if defendant can pro(e that an

    ine(itableaccidentca$sed in*$r%&

    TIME LIMIT-TIONS'ro!pt -ction is called for

    Laches + definition

    'laintiff slept on his rights too long

    DISC:-RGE O, TORTS

    Defendant !a% discharge obligation to pa% forda!ages b%

    -gree!ent bet"een parties

    If *$dge!ent is for defendant# tort is discharged&

    -!o$nt of *$dge!ent

    O$t+of+poc.et plaintiff costs

    Co!pensation for pain and s$ffering

    Tort feasor !a% ha(e to pa% e(en after ;;;;;&

    Chapter ;;

    PRO-CT# ,IA4I,IT

    2IS#!R3 !F $R!D0#S LI4ILI#3

    Early 1istory 2Seller3s De-enses 4a*eat Emptor

    ,a+ )i) not &upport 4u2er& Neg!igence

    $ri*ityo( Contract

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    88/106

    !he 56th (entury

    McPher&on $0 4uick Motor Co0

    Neg!igence Theor2Producer:s duty

    5uty 4eglected

    4eglected duty ProGimate #ause of Pl. %nFury

    %arrant2 Theor2

    %mplied 9erchantability

    Promise

    =.S.A.-2=niform Sales Act3 - 6arranty protected thePurchaser only

    =## - EGpanded protection -- howe$er the action wasbased on the contract.

    S#RI# LI4ILI#3

    9ost states generally follow the rule of productsliability as it appears in sec. D"BA of the

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    89/106

    !he +L%)!)773S (ase 2cont.4

    Plaintiff:s Proof

    *Out of Pocet* costs@asting effects of inFury

    Producer:s neglect of safety considerations.

    8888888888888888

    5efecti$e Product

    5esign 5efects

    9anufacturing 5efects

    9areting 5efects

    Cidden 5efects

    5isco$ery

    5amages

    =ser or #onsumer

    !he DE7ED%!3S (ase

    5efendant:s #ase

    Product Alteration

    Ob$iousness 2#ontributory negligence3

    Abusi$e use of product

    8unctional necessity of design product or warnings and state ofthe art.

    #ompliance with standards

    4o proGimate cause

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    90/106

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    91/106

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    92/106

    6ho hires the administrator after appointment7

    A59%4%ST

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    93/106

    Procedural 8airness

    Q 6hy is it needed7

    Q Administrati$e Procedure Act

    Q 8ederal

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    94/106

    Ad$isory Opinions

    #O4T

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    95/106

    Other nin Cnstraints

    e$$w +g Cntract

    Lar In7&nctin

    nin S#rti-e Legis$atin

    0204,C$a%tn Act

    0238,Nrris,LaG&ardia Act

    Natina$ Lar 9e$atins Act , 0235

    a:a Wagner Act

    set the NL9;

    secndar% %ctt? 7&risdictina$stri:es and !eatheredding a$$ &t$awed

    6,da% stri:e ntice re@&ired

    edera$ "ediatin and cnci$iatin ser-ice

    Made &nins res#nsi$e !r trts s the% c&$d e s&ed(

    S"eti"es ca$$ed the S$a-e Lar Act

    nins sti$$ eB#anded 'AL and CIO)

    A&si-e ractices

    * the MC$e$$an C&11ittee

    HI#TORICA, 4AC*GRON- cont

    Landr&",Gri!!en Act ,'Lar,ManagDt 9e#rtingand +isc$s&re Act ! 0252)

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    96/106

    Ca&sed e"#$%ers? $ar rgani.atins? and their !!icia$st adhere t high standards ! res#nsii$it%? ethica$ cnd&ct

    Had teeth '!ines and i"#risn"ent)?

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    97/106

    &nctins as an% ther edera$ Agenc%

    &risdictinF E"#$%er in Interstate C""(

    * A$s? e"#$%erDs -$&"e ! &siness eBceeds set d$$ar$i"its !r a #artic&$ar ind&str%

    What ha##ens when NL9; re!&ses 7&risdictin

    E1+$&ee Re+resentati&n 8ste+s in se$eting a 0argaining agent9

    etitin

    In-estigatin

    E$ectins

    &a$i!ied ters

    Ca"#aigning

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    98/106

    Law!&$ nin Cercin

    Stri:es

    I! the &nin has n cntract #r-isin arring it

    !r" stri:e orcntract ti"e has r&n &t? then ( ( (

    Ecn"ic Stri:e

    n!air Lar ractice Stri:e

    Sit,dwn Stri:e

    ic:eting

    C&rts ha-e -iewed #ic:eting s"ewhat $ess that a

    !&$$ ( ( (

    ;$ac:"ai$ ic:eting

    Methds? Changes and rtected Wr:

    reser-atin C$a&se

    eatheredding

    Chapter ;. %OR*ER#COMPEN#ATION

    IE ..:

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    99/106

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    100/106

    Some state laws re+uire co$erage 2with *teeth*3

    pro$ides employer with immunity from suits eGcept grossnegligence intentional misconduct.

    6orer ne$er has to pay for co$erage

    Employer may self-insure in some states

    EGceptions in e$ery state

    agricultural employees

    domestic ser$ants

    independent contractors

    casual worers and/or worers in religious or charitableorgani,ations

    minimum number of employees

    owners as employees

    @aws tend to eGpand with time

    Premiums

    #osts reflects employer:s insurance company:s premiumre+uirement

    Premium for co$erage on a gi$en Fob in insurance company:s ratemanual

    usually based on L1"" of payroll costs 2the more ha,ard thehigher the premium3

    8uture Premiums may be raised or lowered according toemployer:s eGperience rating.

    Second %nFury funds

    6hat they are

    4early all laws limit the second employer:s responsibility to theinFuries suffered in second employer:s Fob.

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    101/106

    #reated mostly by legislati$e appropriation

    Amount of #ompensation

    5epends on

    nature of the inFury

    specifications of worer:s compensation law

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    102/106

    %ntentional self-inflicted inFury

    Cha+ter ,6 SAET;

    IE 4553/6553Engineering Law and Ethics

    AC

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    103/106

    !ree !r" recgni.ed ha.ards

    $i:e$% t ca&se death r seri&s #h%sica$ har"

    Sha$$ c"#$% with OSH standards #r"&$gated &nder thisAct(

    E"#$%eeDs res#nsii$ities

    t c"#$% ( ( ( With a$$ r&$es which are a##$ica$e t his wnactins and cnd&ct

    A##$icai$it%

    Cngress #assed OSHA ( ( (

    OSHA is $i"ited in 7&risdictin t c"#anies that a!!ect

    interstate c""erce(

    C&rts tend t ta:e an eB#anded -iew ! what cnstit&tesinterstate c""erce

    Nt intended t re#$ace c-erage % ther !edera$ acts rwr:erDs c"#ensatin

    .SHA- cntin&ed

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    104/106

    +irectr res#nsi$e t SecD% HHS? &t is re@&ired t wr:c$se$% with SecD% Lar

    9esearch and Ed&catin !&nctins

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    105/106

    Standards

    What is sa!e en&gh

    When OSHA was created? gi-en 8 %ears t eBa"ine and

    ad#t cncens&s standards

    wh$esa$e ad#tin ! ind&str% standards? state standards?ANSI standards? standards !r" ther s&rces(

    High$% &se!&$? "di!ied? &se$ess

    EBa"#$eF gr&nd,!a&$t #rtectin standard(

    'see #( 446,4=)

    Standard Setting and 9&$e Ma:ing

    ariances

  • 8/10/2019 Engineering Law and Ethics Mississippi State University

    106/106

    A##ea$

    ena$ties

    Seri&s i$atin r Wi$$!&$ i$atin

    Aate"ent erid

    9ecrd Jee#ing

    A$$ &t !air$% tri-ia$ wr:,re$ated in7&ries r i$$nesses "&st erecrded

    9ecrds "&st e a-ai$a$e !r c"#$iance

    E-en S"a$$ &sinesses "&st :ee# recrds

    E-en recrd ccatina$ in7&ries res&$ting in death? $stwr:da%s? restrictin ! "tin? $ss ! cnsci&sness? 7trans!er? "edica$ treat"ent ther than !irst aid(

    OSHA and the $itica$ En-irn"ent

    When OSHA was rn

    When the : was written