enhanced student teaching cooperating teacher

41
1 ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER HANDBOOK 2015-16 Master of Education in Initial Teacher Licensure Program Carter & Moyers School of Education Carter & Moyers School of Education Lincoln Memorial University Harrogate, TN 37752 865-531-4116 [email protected][email protected]

Upload: vanxuyen

Post on 05-Jan-2017

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

1

ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING

COOPERATING TEACHER HANDBOOK

2015-16

Master of Education in

Initial Teacher Licensure Program

Carter & Moyers School of Education

Carter & Moyers School of Education

Lincoln Memorial University

Harrogate, TN 37752

865-531-4116

[email protected] 31T

[email protected]

Page 2: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

2

Table of Contents

31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31T31TDirectory ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3

Program Faculty ........................................................................................................................................................ 3

Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 4

MEdITL Program Mission ............................................................................................................................................ 5

Program Theme and Beliefs ...................................................................................................................................... 5

Teacher Education Candidate Professional Dispositions .......................................................................................... 6

Student Teaching ........................................................................................................................................................... 7

Roles and Responsibilities of the MEdITL Candidate .............................................................................................. 7

Student Teaching Policies ......................................................................................................................................... 7

Attendance ............................................................................................................................................................ 7

Corporal Punishment ............................................................................................................................................ 8

Course Work ......................................................................................................................................................... 8

Dress and Grooming ............................................................................................................................................. 8

Liability Insurance ................................................................................................................................................ 8

Licensure Questions .............................................................................................................................................. 8

Professional Activities .......................................................................................................................................... 9

Schedule ................................................................................................................................................................ 9

Substitute Teaching ............................................................................................................................................... 9

Termination of Student Teaching ......................................................................................................................... 9

Transportation ....................................................................................................................................................... 9

Visits from LMU Professional Education Faculty (PEF) ..................................................................................... 9

Requirements for Student Teaching .............................................................................................................................. 9

Cooperating Teachers’ Roles ....................................................................................................................................... 12

Cooperating Teacher Expectations .............................................................................................................................. 12

Clinical Practice Co-Teaching Guidelines ................................................................................................................... 13

Appendix A -F ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..15

INTASC Standards, Goals, and Performance Expectations 14

Disposition Form ………………………………………………………………………………………………….21

LMU Lesson Plan Format ....................................................................................................................................... 24

Modified TEAM Rubrics ..... …………………………………………………………………………………… 26

Modified TEAM Observation Form …………………………………………………………………………… .. 38

Helpful Key Terms .................................... ……………………………………………………………….…… ..40

Page 3: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

3

Directory

Dean, Carter & Moyers School of Education…….............. ............................. Dr. Michael Clyburn (423) 869-6223

Associate Dean, Carter & Moyers School of Education...... ............................... Dr. Teresa Bicknell (865) 531-4108

Director of MEd in Initial Teacher Licensure Program ....................................... Dr. Tammy Barnes (423) 361-3171

Program Counselor ...................................................................................................... Jamie Rutland (865) 531-4116

Director of Clinical/Field Experiences .................................................................. Dr. Cherie Gaines (865) 531-4154

Director of Testing/Certification ...................................................................................... Erin Brock (423) 869-6405

Director of Financial Aid ................................................................................................ Jonah Scent (423) 869-6274

Student Accounts ..........................................................................................................Joyce Stanley (423) 869-6305

Program Faculty

Dr. Tammy Barnes Assistant Professor, Program Director

Phone: 423-361-3171 E-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Rebecca Burleson Assistant Professor

Phone: 423-741-9656 E-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Kevin Jones Associate Professor

Phone: 423-489-0525 E-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Tony Maxwell Adjunct Professor

Phone: 423-869-6257 E-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Ashley Stanley Assistant Professor

Phone: 423-276-661 E-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Susan Wagner Assistant Professor

Phone: E-mail:

Dr. Vicki Clevinger Adjunct Faculty, Education

Phone: 423-335-5341 E-mail [email protected]

Professional Certification and Licensure Disclaimer

Authorization for the University to provide a program for the preparation of teachers or

administrators does not guarantee eligibility for certification or licensure. It is the sole

responsibility of the candidate to be knowledgeable about specific state certification/licensure

requirements, qualify for certification or licensure, and apply for the same.

Page 4: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

4

Introduction

Welcome to student teaching! This experience will be one of the most rewarding, exciting, and challenging

experiences of a lifetime. The faculty and staff at Lincoln Memorial University are dedicated to helping our teacher

candidates have a successful experience which can lead to a lifetime career in education.

This MEd in Initial Teacher Licensure (MEdITL) Cooperating Teacher Handbook is intended to assist

cooperating teacher mentors of these teacher candidates pursuing teacher licensure for Elementary, K-12, and

Secondary Education. This handbook is a dated publication; an online version may be found at

http://www.lmunet.edu/education/storage/. The complete Enhanced Student Teaching Handbook can also be

found at that site.

This graduate level teacher licensure program is designed to conform to current Tennessee and University guidelines

and requirements. Candidates should be aware that teacher education requirements are subject to change in order to

maintain compliance with state and university requirements. The Program reserves the right to make

programmatic changes and to implement such changes as deemed necessary by the Tennessee Department of

Education or Lincoln Memorial University.

Each MEdITL student is responsible for current information regarding his/her specific program of study. Each

student should review the program website on a regular basis. Faculty and staff will disseminate program

information as needed and are always available to answer questions. Candidates seeking inter-state reciprocity for

licensure are responsible for obtaining and completing all licensing and testing requirements for those states in

which they are seeking reciprocity.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Any student with a disability (learning or physical) should bring

documentation for the disability to the ADA Compliance Office of Student Services. When documentation has been

reviewed, a form will be completed stating the reasonable accommodations to be granted to the student with a

disability. The contact number for the Office of Student Services is (423) 869 6213.

Statement of Nondiscrimination: Lincoln Memorial University shall not discriminate against any person based

on age, color, creed, disability, ethnic/national origin, gender, military status, race, religion, or sexual orientation.

Unit Commitment to Diversity – The School of Education recognizes differences among groups of people and

individuals based on ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, gender, exceptionalities, language, religion, sexual

orientation, and geographical area. The unit designs, implements, and evaluates curriculum and provides

experiences for candidates to acquire and demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions necessary

to help all students learn. Assessments indicate that candidates can demonstrate and apply proficiencies related to

diversity. Experiences provided for candidates include working with diverse populations, including higher

education and K-12 school faculty, candidates, and students in K-12 schools.

Social Networking Policy: Lincoln Memorial University supports use of blogs and social networking sites* by

University departments/programs. Users must recognize that:

All information posted on a University department/program blog and/or social networking site must: be in

compliance with the LMU's Acceptable Use Policy (outlined in the faculty/staff and student handbooks)

and all other University policies, follow acceptable social behaviors and comply with federal and state

regulations.

If an activity on a social networking site is reported as violating University policy as outlined in the

appropriate handbook, it will be investigated and handled according to the disciplinary process.

University department/program blogs and social networking websites/pages created in the University's

name are representatives of Lincoln Memorial University and therefore subject to the guidelines, policies

and branding of the LMU. Adherence to the University style manual is mandatory.

Page 5: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

5

University representatives can and do monitor these web sites regularly. LMU reserves the right to disable,

change or modify University department/program blog and or social networking sites if University policies

are not followed.

Personal blogs identifying a person as an LMU employee or student should have clear disclaimers that the

views expressed by the author in the blog is the author’s alone and do not represent the views of the

University. Sample disclaimer: This is my personal account and the content included here does not

represent the opinions of my employer.

Be respectful of the University, faculty, staff, students and University constituents.

Information published on University department/program or personal blogs and social networking sites

shall comply with the University’s confidentiality and HIPPA policies. Information which is confidential

and proprietary to the University shall not be posted. These restrictions also apply to comments posted on

other blogs, forums and social networking sites.

Respect copyright laws and reference or cite sources appropriately. All official University

department/program blogs and/or social networking sites must include this disclosure statement: This is an

officially recognized entity of Lincoln Memorial University. Any questions about content can be directed to

the Office of Public Relations and Marketing.

When considering creating a University department/program blog and/or social networking site, users are asked to

contact the director of social networking for assistance in setting up the page to match the look and feel of the

University branding and website. Additionally all official University department/program blogs and/or social

networking sites must be registered with the director of social networking, who should be added as an admin (where

available).

*Social networking sites include, but are not limited to: Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, Youtube, Flickr, LinkedIn,

etc.

(Proposed 9/4/09)

MEdITL Program Mission

The MEdITL Program supports the Lincoln Memorial Teacher Education Program’s mission and is dedicated to

preparing quality practitioners who are highly effective in their teaching and learning as a result of abilities acquired

through rigorous and diverse academic studies, and in collaboration with K-12 schools. This Program strives to

develop teacher-leaders who inspire renewal, who are capable of meeting the challenges of an ever increasingly

global society, and who possess an understanding of the moral, social, and political dimensions of education.

Program Theme and Beliefs

The MEdITL Program supports the theme and beliefs of the Lincoln Memorial Teacher Education Program that

provides the philosophical base, direction, and parameters for the faculty to prepare teachers for tomorrow’s

educational demands. Therefore, our candidates and the program should:

1. share a joint responsibility with Lincoln Memorial University and K-12 schools;

2. have a strong foundation in general education courses, academic majors, and specialty areas;

3. possess a strong background in professional methodology and pedagogy;

4. establish a firm teaching foundation based on the constructivist theory;

5. prepare reflective teachers who continuously assess their teaching and learning processes;

6. collaborate with a variety of K-12 schools for the purpose of promoting best practices to our K-12

stakeholders;

7. encourage an interdisciplinary and interactive approach to the teaching and learning process that

engages the candidate in professional development;

8. integrate coursework with clinical and field experiences by promoting the collaborative process with

participating schools;

9. provide experiences for candidates to understand and appreciate individuals with special needs and

abilities;

10. provide experiences for candidates to understand and appreciate diversity among teachers, students,

Page 6: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

6

and the community;

11. incorporate viable research on effective teaching and effective teacher education practices;

12. incorporate the use of new technology appropriate for the classroom;

13. prepare teachers to help students expand their horizons toward a world view while preserving the local

culture;

14. prepare teachers to disseminate scholarly knowledge in language understood by the local culture;

15. support Program graduates, and provide assistance during their first year of teaching, where possible;

and

16. prepare teachers to provide an education that gives students positive options for their futures.

Teacher Education Candidate Professional Dispositions

CAEP Standard 1 requires that teacher candidates exhibit Professional Dispositions, defined as

professional attitudes, values, and beliefs demonstrated through both verbal and non-verbal behaviors as

educators interact with students, families, colleagues, and communities. These positive behaviors support

student learning and development.

Candidate recommended from LMU to be certified by Tennessee must exhibit Professional Dispositions in their

interactions with all stakeholders, including classmates, K-12 mentoring teachers, K-12 administrators, cooperating

teachers, students, and university faculty, staff and supervisors while in the university environment and in field

placements. Reports of behavior, actions, or attitudes that are not considered professional or meeting the

Professional Disposition requirements could result in termination from the Teacher Education Program. Candidate

dispositions will be measured during all three Program Modules. Candidates, whose dispositions are in question,

regardless of academic achievement, are subject to a developmental plan or dismissal at any time during the

program when concerns are raised by Program faculty. Students dismissed during any stage of the program can

appeal using the Appeals Policy stated in the Graduate Education catalog.

Review boards will be held at the end of each semester for those students whose dispositions and/or academic

achievement are in question.

The following is a summary list of Professional Dispositions indicators:

1. Attendance and Punctuality

2. Initiative

3. Work Habits

4. Oral Communication

5. Written Communication Skills

6. Collegiality

7. Respect (in action and speech)

8. Commitment to Profession

9. Professionalism in Clinical & Field Placement (Ethics, Professional Growth, and

Confidentiality)

Page 7: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

7

Student Teaching

Student teaching is a professional semester that will focus on direct teacher experience in at least two classrooms

which may be at different schools that requires the teacher candidate to teach full-time in approved K-12 public

school(s) for a minimum of one semester (approximately 16 weeks total). Students are required to join STEA or

maintain equivalent professional liability insurance.

Roles and Responsibilities of the MEdITL Candidate

The roles and responsibilities of the MEdITL Candidate, throughout his/her student teaching experience, is one of a

learner. A student teacher should:

1. understand that she/he is a guest in the K-12 public school;

2. acquire a student handbook from the school administrator’s office;

3. become familiar with and abide by the K-12 school rules, regulations, and expectations, including

dress code and professional behavior listed in this handbook;

4. become familiar with the school, its community, faculty, organization, curriculum, and physical plant;

5. make her/his day at school the same (as a minimum) as that of the cooperating teacher regarding and

length of the school day, extra-curricular assignments, duties, etc.;

6. ask questions: know definitively what the expectations are of the cooperating teacher, the field

supervisor, and the seminar instructor;

7. attend and participate in school functions such as faculty meetings, school board meetings, staff

development, and parent conferences;

8. be punctual and dependable regarding all school related activities;

9. notify, as far in advance as possible, the cooperating teacher(s), university supervisor, and school

office secretary or administrator, if she/he must be late or absent from student teaching;

10. inquire about making up any missed time regarding a tardy or absence, as soon as possible;

11. demonstrate effective pedagogical skills, as learned in class and on the job;

12. display competence in the content knowledge area, while exerting both an effort and a willingness to

learn more from an experienced teacher;

13. be action-oriented and creative; make teaching and learning come alive;

14. seek assistance from cooperating teachers regarding appropriate curriculum and methodology for each

student and accept the teachers’ decisions;

15. develop written instructional plans for all classes for which he or she is responsible, and have the plans

approved and initialed by the cooperating teacher at least 24-hours prior to implementation;

16. accept the cooperating teacher’s advice and decisions regarding the content material to be taught;

17. endeavor to establish and maintain effective professional working relationships with the cooperating

teacher, administration, and the faculty and staff at the host school;

18. accept cooperating teacher’s suggestions as a constructive critique and review and study intently any

feedback from cooperating teachers regarding subjects such as planning, teaching, student assessment,

classroom management, conferences, and evaluations, using this information to make necessary

adjustments;

19. protect confidential information, such as student records, in a professional and responsible manner;

20. attend all student teacher seminars as scheduled by the program;

21. demonstrate professionalism and a positive attitude to all university and public school faculty and staff;

and

22. diligently and continually strive to develop one’s self as a well-rounded teaching professional, thus

promoting a positive image of the teaching profession.

Student Teaching Policies

22TAttendance 22T: Student teaching consists of a minimum of one semester of observation and student teaching. The student

teacher is expected to be in attendance EVERY DAY throughout the entire period of student teaching, and to be there,

at a minimum, for the same school hours as his/her cooperating teacher. If it is necessary to be late or absent from

student teaching, the candidate must notify, as soon as possible, the cooperating teacher, the university PEF, and the

school to which they are assigned. Absences of more than two consecutive days must be cleared through the Program

Director.

Early dismissal from the student teaching day is not permitted except where necessary to attend a scheduled function

that has been pre-approved by the LMU supervisor. Student teaching is a planned professional semester that requires

Page 8: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

8

a student teacher to adhere to their cooperating teacher’s schedule.

Background Check: In addition to the Tennessee Cogent TBI-L1 Background Check completed at program

admission, some school systems may require additional testing at the candidate’s expense before candidates may enter

the school for field experiences or student teaching.

Cancellation of an Assignment: When change/cancellation/reassignment of a field experience assignment becomes

necessary, the appropriate LMU field supervisor should notify the Field Placement Coordinator and Program Director.

These changes will be made only after the approval of the Program Director, Director of Clinical/Field Placement,

Field Placement Coordinator and the appropriate school and district personnel. Students should not leave their

assigned schools without the direct permission of their university supervisor(s).

Cell Phones and Laptops: Cell phones are not to be used during student teaching hours. It is intended for laptops to

be used for assignments only. The unnecessary use of laptops during discussion, lecture, or other classroom

activities will be considered inappropriate.

Children

Children are not to be brought to the host school during student teaching and/or other activities at the school unless

these are extra-curricular activities.

22TCorporal Punishment 22T: Student teachers may not administer corporal punishment to students or arrange to have

someone else administer it. Also, they may not serve as witness if school staff members administer corporal

punishment.

22TCourse Work22T: No other course work may be taken by candidates during their Enhanced Student Teaching semester.

In exceptional cases, student teachers may seek the approval of the head of the college or department of education to

take no more than one additional course during this semester provided: (1) the course does not interfere with the

student teacher’s full participation in all activities associated with student teaching, and (2) no other opportunity exists

for the student to take the course before completion of the teacher education program.

–Tennessee Licensure Standards and Induction Guidelines

22TDress and Grooming 22T: The attire and grooming of the student teacher while in the K-12 public school should conform

to the standards and expectations of the school for its faculty and of the teaching profession in general (i.e., blue jeans

and t-shirts are NOT acceptable attire). Failure to conform to dress code standards will result in disciplinary action

and may jeopardize the successful completion of student teaching and teacher certification.

Ethical Behavior

Candidates must sign a Statement of Ethics (see Appendix C) and a Certificate of Authorship (see Appendix D) to

indicate professional behavior in all work, both inside and outside of the LMU classes as well as student teaching.

22TLiability Insurance 22T:22T All candidates enrolled in any field or clinical experiences in the MEdITL program are required

to be protected by professional liability insurance prior to working or visiting any K-12 school to complete coursework

requirements. Insurance through a personal provider must be approved by the university and be equivalent to the

amount provided through a professional academic organization. This liability insurance must be current through

all field experiences until the end of student teaching.

22TLicensure Questions22T: For questions regarding additional licensure recommendations, please contact Director of

Testing/Certification, Erin Brock, (423) 869-6405.

Materials: All student teachers must acquire and maintain: a lesson plan book, a personal grade book, a listing of

all students in their classrooms, a copy of classroom discipline plans, personal student teacher time log (see format).

These materials should be brought to seminar with you each scheduled class meeting.

Placement Request: Candidates may request a county for placement during student teaching; however, there is no

guarantee of any placement in any county, even the one requested. Student teachers should not be placed at schools

in which an immediate relative or close family friend is a student or staff member.

Page 9: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

9

22TProfessional Activities 22T: The student teacher should attend and participate in professional meetings. These include

staff development, faculty meetings, PTO meetings, parent conferences, departmental meetings, and other

involvement at the invitation of the cooperating teacher or school administrator.

Professionalism: In order to begin the student teaching experience and to remain in the experience, each student must

not only be successful in coursework but must also exhibit the Professional Dispositions required by the School of

Education. Students who are not doing well in coursework or who do not exhibit the required Professional

Dispositions are subject to either a developmental plan or dismissal from the program based on the recommendations

of the faculty. Students in EDUC 570, EDUC 571, or EDUC 591 whose progress is in question will meet with a board

comprised of faculty members and the Program Director.

Social Activities: It is expected that student teachers will lead normal lives, both professionally and socially. Student

teachers should seek to broaden contacts with people in the community through social activities open to a teacher in

the community. Use tact, discretion, and caution in social interactions and with social media with students and parents.

Under no conditions should a student teacher date or develop a non-professional relationship with a student.

22TSchedule 22T: It is the student teacher’s responsibility to keep the PEF informed of her/his teaching schedule and

changes made to that schedule. The student teacher is required to send weekly reflections about each week’s

experience in reflections to both the PEF and the seminar instructor.

22TSubstitute Teaching 22T: Student teachers must not serve as substitute teachers. In case of an emergency, the school

administrator should appoint a faculty member to monitor and assist the student teacher until a substitute arrives.

Student teachers must not receive payment for any school-related activity during the academic school day. This is a

regulation from the Tennessee State Board of Education.

Travel Requirements: LMU, in accordance with CAEP accreditation, requires candidates be able to teach all students

from all backgrounds. Due to this requirement, candidates may be required to travel up to 65 miles from your

institutional school base to complete the requirements for field experiences and/or clinical experience.

22TTermination of Student Teaching 22T: A student teacher whose progress is considered unsatisfactory by the LMU PEF,

the cooperating teacher, the Director of Clinical/Field Placement, and the Program Director may be administratively

withdrawn from student teaching. Success must be attained during the first 8-week placement to advance to the

second placement. The possibility of re-entry into student teaching will be decided on a case-by-case basis and may

include remediation of classes/coursework, a personal developmental plan, and other requirements as determined by

the program administration and appropriate stakeholders.

22TTransportation 22T: It is the responsibility of the student teacher to arrange for transportation to and from the teaching

site.

Vacations: Student teachers will follow the vacation schedules of school systems to which they are assigned rather

than university vacation schedules. Teacher Candidates are required to attend all seminars, even those that may be

scheduled during the school system’s scheduled vacation.

22TVisits from LMU Professional Education Faculty: The LMU MEdITL program maintains a cadre of experienced

field supervisors who are educators with advanced degrees and experience and who are committed to the preparation

of professional educators of distinction to make a positive impact on this generation and the next. The LMU field

supervisor will visit the student teacher periodically during student teaching. Usually, a visit will be made early in the

period before the student teacher assumes complete teaching responsibility. Additional visits will be made when full-

time teaching begins. A minimum of five evaluations are required during the semester of student teaching. The total

number of visits will depend on the student teacher’s progress and will be at the discretion of university employees.

Requirements for Student Teaching

as Delineated by the Department of Education and the MEdITL Program

Page 10: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

10

at Lincoln Memorial University

Each candidate will show evidence of achieving the program goals in a Professional Program Portfolio and in an

Educator Work Sample (EWS) which will come from designated assignments throughout the program. Upon

successful completion of the student teaching experience, each candidate will give a final demonstration of

achievement of the Program Goals in an Exit Interview before faculty and peers. The EWS will be discussed in

classes in each module. *Be sure to keep a copy of all paperwork submitted. This is good practice and may prevent

many unforeseen problems. General requirements include the following:

1. Collect and organize materials for professional/exit interview portfolio; this portfolio and selected works

from previous courses will be selected to develop and present an online portfolio to be used for exit interview

and Teacher Work Sample (EWS).

2. Complete full-time student teaching in two different grade level placements or with two different cooperating

teachers. Elementary student teachers must have both primary and intermediate placements. Secondary

must teach with two different cooperating teachers at two different grade levels during the semester (Ex:

teacher A teaching at sophomore level and teacher B teaching at senior level).

3. Be in attendance throughout the entire period of student teaching. Observe the same school hours and

assigned duties as the cooperating teacher. Attend all school functions such as faculty meetings, professional

development activities, and in-service. It is advised that student teachers ask permission from the cooperating

teacher or school administrator before attending those meetings that might be considered “confidential.”

4. Attendance at all 591 seminar classes is mandatory. Dates for all seminar sessions are listed on the syllabus.

Dates for all seminar sessions should be provided to the cooperating teachers and the school administrator.

Students should not ask to arrive late or leave seminar early. Schools district scheduled vacations or break

times are not excused absences from attendance at scheduled seminars. Failure to attend seminar or complete

all assigned work will affect course completion.

5. Complete and submit all assignments on time as given by the EDUC 591 seminar instructor.

6. Assist cooperating teacher with all assignments (e.g., lunch duty, bus duty, hall monitoring, etc.) that are

required of the cooperating teacher.

7. Tour the school building; familiarize yourself with school policy, disciplinary policy, emergency exits,

fire-escape routes, other grade levels, departments, and disciplines. Student teachers are responsible for

executing the same school and discipline policy/emergency procedures required of their cooperating teachers.

8. Familiarize yourself with available school equipment: copy machine, overhead, DVD, iPad, Smartboard, etc.

9. Acquaint yourself with the school library, policies, and materials available as well as the check-out process.

10. All student teachers must participate in a minimum of one Service Learning Project during the semester.

**All student teachers should plan, develop and demonstrate the appropriate use of a wide variety of teaching

strategies and activities in the classroom which may include Learning Centers; Learning Stations; Thematic

Units; Plays, Trials, and Debates; Musicals; and Cooperative Learning Activities. Be sure to document the

use of these activities and, where possible, take pictures for the portfolio.

Service Learning Requirements

All service learning activities must meet, at a minimum, the following requirements:

Must be approved by faculty member before service learning activity is performed;

Must be a major community or school activity;

Must involve children or a school;

Must include a minimum of 5-7 hours;

Must include a written reflection, minimum of 1 page;

Must include 1-3 pictures; and

Must be submitted electronically and in hard copy to seminar class instructor and placed in the

electronic portfolio.

Student Teacher Weekly Reflection and Log

On a weekly basis, the student teacher will be expected to submit a student teaching reflection. This should be

Page 11: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

11

submitted via e-mail to both the field supervisor and seminar instructor. This reflection must be submitted each

week by Saturday at noon (or earlier, as required by field supervisor and/or seminar instructor).

Failure to turn in this weekly reflection, or to submit it on time, may have an adverse effect upon the student

teacher’s final evaluation.

Weekly reflections must include the following information.

1. Weekly accomplishments

2. Notes on things the student teacher might have done, or will do, differently

3. Specific goals or areas on which the student teacher is concentrating

4. Problems or concerns that the student teacher may have

5. Specific areas of support that might be needed

6. The total number of hours spent in teaching/planning per week and a running total of hours logged

during this student teaching experience. (e.g., This week I spent 35 hours teaching science, math

and spelling. I also spent 12 hours after school grading paperwork and planning for this week’s

teaching. So far, I have logged 148 hours of teaching and planning for the semester.)

A weekly Time Log will be maintained in both hard copy and electronic format. This time log will be turned in with

all student teaching requirements at your exit interview. Hours may be counted toward student teaching if used in

the following manner:

1. Required hours during the school day;

2. Planning/grading outside the regular school day, up to 2 hours per day;

3. Extra-curricular duties assigned by the school administrator or cooperating teacher (i.e., bus,

cafeteria breakfast, after school detention, supervising ball games, or after school activities);

4. After school meetings, including parent meetings, parent’s night, school board meetings,

PTA/PTO; and

5. Two hours per day on the weekends (total 4 hours) if used for planning, grading, or preparation for

teaching.

NOTE: Hours acquired/required for coaching an athletic team may not be counted toward logged hours for

student teaching.

Evaluation Format

The lesson plan (see Appendix C) format has been approved by LMU MEdITL program faculty and staff and should

be used for all student teaching evaluations. Student teachers will be evaluated five times with a modified version of

the Tennessee Educator Acceleration Model (TEAM), based on the evaluation system used by the Tennessee

Department of Education (see Appendix D and Appendix E). A minimum of five evaluations is required during the

semester of student teaching; however, the total number of visits will depend upon the student teacher’s progress.

In addition, the student teacher will be required to video a portion of their lesson for self-assessment.

Steps for Evaluation

48 hours (minimum) before teaching the lesson, or as instructed by the field supervisor, the student teacher must do

the following:

1. Complete LMU format lesson plan and e-mail to field supervisor, and

2. Gather and have copies of all paperwork needed, including an extra copy of lesson plan with

cooperating teacher’s signature, a seating chart (not identifying students by name), and other relevant

forms.

Day of Evaluation:

1. Have a seat for the field supervisor out of the immediate sight range of students. Have all paperwork,

including lesson plan and seating chart, readily available for the field supervisor.

3. Meet with field supervisor after the lesson to reflect on the lesson and complete paperwork.

4. Make a copy of all paperwork for your files—field supervisor needs to keep originals.

5. Use the information/feedback from the evaluation to prepare for future lessons.

Page 12: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

12

Cooperating Teachers/Mentors

Cooperating Teacher Selection

Cooperating teachers are selected based on the following criteria.

At least 4 years of full-time teaching experience

Appropriate certification

Highly competent based on local, state, or national evaluation

Willingness to assume the role of mentor by

o Supervising candidate’s instructional activities, observing candidate, and providing and

documenting formative performance feedback,

o Demonstrating effective classroom instruction to candidate,

o Being present in classroom with candidate (or designate another appropriate individual for

unexpected short-term absences),

o Meeting daily with candidate to provide assistance in planning curriculum and instruction,

diagnosing learner needs and differences, evaluating student progress, developing classroom

management skills, selecting teaching strategies and instructional materials, and adapting to school

culture,

o Meeting with field supervisor to identify candidate needs, plan assistance strategies, discuss

candidate progress, and participate in orientation and training for candidate teams,

o Providing pedagogical instruction to candidate as determined in cooperation with student teaching

team, and

o Assisting in candidate evaluation.

Principal recommendation.

Cooperating Teacher Expectations

During the semester, the cooperating teacher will be asked to do the following:

Serve as a mentor by supervising student teachers in instructional activities and providing and documenting

formative performance feedback

Participate in co-teaching with the student teacher in the classroom

Demonstrate effective classroom instruction and classroom management techniques to candidates

Be present in classroom while clinical experience candidates are in the classroom

Meet regularly with student teacher to provide assistance in planning and instruction, diagnosing learner

needs and differences, evaluating student progress, developing classroom management skills, selecting

teaching strategies and instructional materials, and adapting to school culture

Communicate with field supervisors to identify candidate needs, plan assistance strategies, and discuss

candidate progress

Contact appropriate LMU personnel immediately if problem arises

Attend training by LMU

Complete Cooperating Teacher Profile (online form)

Evaluate candidates monthly

Evaluate Initial Teacher Licensure Program at end of placement (online form)

**It is extremely important that the student teacher have common preparation/planning period with the

cooperating teacher(s). This planning period should be used to reflect and plan subsequent teaching, to

observe strategies and techniques in other classrooms, and to complete assigned teaching experiences.

Clinical Practice Co-Teaching Guidelines

Given the renewed emphasis in Tennessee on teacher assessment and accountability, LMU candidates will serve as

co-teachers in clinical practice and teaching assistants in field experiences.

Page 13: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

13

Clinical Practice: Instead of the focus of clinical practice being on the student teacher easing in and out of

classroom teaching, the student teacher will co-teach with the cooperating teacher to enhance the candidates’

learning opportunities. While most LMU student teachers possess a high level of content knowledge, what is still

needed is the application of that knowledge to diverse teaching strategies, individual learning styles, and classroom

management skills. The tutelage of the cooperating teacher will continue to be of paramount importance during

clinical practice as the student teacher develops the knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary for a highly

qualified and proficient teacher. Co-teaching will commence as near to the beginning of each clinical practice

placement as is feasible. Components of this co-teaching partnership between the clinical practitioner and the

cooperating teacher will be as follows:

Shared instructional responsibility

Primarily in a single classroom or workspace with one group of students

Presentation of content that meets state standards and prepares students for competency, TCAP, and/or end-

of-course tests

Mutual ownership, pooled resources, and joint accountability

Varying levels of participation in daily presentations and routines

With input and direction from the LMU supervisor, building principal, and other professional colleagues, the school-

specific co-teaching partnership may manifest itself on any given day or throughout the entire placement in any of

the following ways:

One teaches while the other observes and gathers data that can help shape instruction for future lessons of

the whole class or for tutoring or guided instruction of individuals and small groups.

One teaches while the other assists with student participation, understanding, and interaction offering

unobtrusive assistance as needed.

Parallel teaching has both teachers presenting the same information simultaneously to a divided class thus

creating smaller groups and enhancing opportunities for participation and questioning.

Station teaching has each teacher presenting different content to half of the student simultaneously. Then

teachers switch groups. A third station could require students to work independently.

Alternative/differentiated teaching is structured so that one teacher instructs a small group needing

specialized attention while the other teacher teaches the majority of the class.

Team teaching or the one brain in two bodies approach is the most complex of the co-teaching

manifestations and is the most dependent on individual teaching styles. With this approach, there is an

invisible flow of instruction between the two co-teachers.

It is strongly suggested that a combination of these are utilized during student teaching, with the LMU candidate

assuming the role as the lead teacher before the end of the semester. Co-teaching does not take the place of solo

teaching. While a specific period of solo teaching is no longer a requirement, it is strongly recommended that the

student teacher be allowed to have teaching time on his/her own.

Appendix A

Page 14: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

14

INTASC Standards, Goals, and Performance Expectations

A primary purpose of the Masters in Initial Teacher Licensure Program is to prepare teachers who demonstrate

acquisition of appropriate content knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions, that enable them to be effective

and successful in the classroom, to make a positive impact on this generation and the next. Each goal below is

accompanied by one or more performance expectations that are required to be met by the candidate. Course syllabi

are directly connected to the goals and performance expectations, the Institutional Standards, and linked to the

Tennessee Licensure Standards, InTASC (Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium), and NCATE

Standards.

The goals and performance expectations are introduced in Module I and are sequenced throughout Module II and

Module III. Evidence that each candidate has achieved and/or accomplished each goal and performance expectation

is assessed systematically beginning in Module I and culminating with the Exit Interview in Module IV.

Goal 1: Learner Development

The candidate understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development

vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas, and designs and

implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences.

Performances:

1.P(a): The candidate regularly assesses individual and group performance in order to design and modify

instruction to meet learners’ needs in each area of development (cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and

physical) and scaffolds the next level of development.

1.P(b): The candidate creates developmentally appropriate instruction that takes into account individual learners’

strengths, interests, and needs and that enables each learner to advance and accelerate his/her learning.

1.P(c): The candidate collaborates with families, communities, colleagues, and other professionals to promote

learner growth and development.

Knowledge:

1.K(a): The candidate understands how learning occurs – how learners construct knowledge, acquire skills, and

develop disciplined thinking processes – and knows how to use instructional strategies that promote student

learning.

1.K(b): The candidate understands that each learner’s cognitive, linguistic, social emotional, and physical

development influences learning and knows how to make instructional decisions that build on learners’ strengths

and needs.

1.K(c): The candidate identifies readiness for learning, and understands how development in any one area may

affect performance in others.

1.K(d): The candidate understands the role of language and culture in learning and knows how to modify

instruction to make language comprehensible and instruction relevant, accessible, and challenging.

Goal 2: Learning Differences

The candidate uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive

learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards.

Performances:

2.P(a): The candidate designs, adapts, and delivers instruction to address each student’s diverse learning strengths

and needs and creates opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning in different ways.

2.P(b): The candidate makes appropriate and timely provisions (e.g., pacing for individual rates of growth, task

demands, communication, assessment, and response modes) for individual students with particular learning

differences or needs.

2.P(c): The candidate designs instruction to build on learners’ prior knowledge and experiences, allowing learners

to accelerate as they demonstrate their understandings.

2.P(d): The candidate brings multiple perspectives to the discussion of content, including attention to learners’

personal, family, and community experiences and cultural norms.

2.P(e): The candidate incorporates tools of language development into planning and instruction, including

strategies for making content accessible to English language learners and for evaluating and supporting their

development of English proficiency.

2.P(f): The candidate accesses resources, supports, and specialized assistance and services to meet particular

learning differences or needs.

Knowledge:

Page 15: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

15

2.K(a): The candidate understands and identifies differences in approaches to learning and performance and knows

how to design instruction that uses each learner’s strengths to promote growth.

2.K(b): The candidate understands students with exceptional needs, including those associated with disabilities

and giftedness, and knows how to use strategies and resources to address these needs.

2.K(c): The candidate knows about second language acquisition processes and knows how to incorporate

instructional strategies and resources to support language acquisition.

2.K(d): The candidate understands the learners bring assets for learning based on their individual experiences,

abilities, talents, prior learning, and peer and social group interactions, as well as language, culture, family, and

community values.

2.K(e): The candidate knows how to access information about the values of diverse cultures and communities and

how to incorporate learners’ experiences, cultures, and community resources into instruction.

Goal 3: Learning Environments

The candidate works with others to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, and that

encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation.

Performances:

3.P(a): The candidate collaborates with learners, families, and colleagues to build a safe, positive learning climate

of openness, mutual respect, support, and inquiry

3.P(b): The candidate develops learning experiences that engage learners in collaborative and self-directed

learning and that extend learner interaction with ideas and people locally and globally.

3.P(c): The candidate collaborates with learners and colleagues to develop shared values and expectations for

respectful interactions, rigorous academic discussions, and individual and group responsibility for quality work.

3.P(d): The candidate manages the learning environment to actively and equitably engage learners by organizing,

allocating, and coordinating the resources of time, space, and learners’ attention.

3.P(e): The candidate uses a variety of methods to engage learners in evaluating the learning environment and

collaborates with learners to make appropriate adjustments.

3.P(f): The candidate communicates verbally and nonverbally in ways that demonstrate respect for and

responsiveness to the cultural backgrounds and differing perspective learners bring to the learning environment.

3.P(g): The candidate promotes responsible learner use of interactive technologies to extend the possibilities for

learning locally and globally.

3.P(h): The candidate intentionally builds learner capacity to collaborate in face-to-face and virtual environments

through applying effective interpersonal communication skills.

Knowledge:

3.K(a): The candidate understands the relationship between motivation and engagement and knows how to design

learning experiences using strategies that build learner self-direction and ownership of learning.

3.K(b): The candidate knows how to help learners work productively and cooperatively with each other to achieve

learning goals.

3.K(c): The candidate knows how to collaborate with learners to establish and monitor elements of a safe and

productive learning environment including norms, expectations, routines, and organizational structures.

3.K(d): The candidate understands how learner diversity can affect communication and knows how to

communicate effectively in differing environments.

3.K(e): The candidate knows how to use technologies and how to guide learners to apply them in appropriate,

safe, and effective ways.

Goal 4: Content Knowledge

The candidate understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches

and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to

assure mastery of the content.

Performances:

4.P(a): The candidate effectively uses multiple representations and explanations that capture key ideas in the

discipline, guide learners through learning progressions, and promote each learner’s achievement of content

standards.

4.P(b): The candidate engages students in learning experiences in the discipline(s) that encourage learners to

understand, question, and analyze ideas from diverse perspectives so that they master the content.

Page 16: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

16

4.P(c): The candidate engages learners in applying methods of inquiry and standards of evidence used in the

discipline. 4.P(d): The candidate stimulates learner reflection on prior content knowledge, links new concepts to

familiar concepts, and makes connections to learners’ experiences.

4.P(e): The candidate recognizes learner misconceptions in a discipline that interfere with learning, and creates

experiences to build accurate conceptual understanding.

4.P(f): The candidate evaluates and modifies instructional resources and curriculum materials for their

comprehensiveness, accuracy for representing particular concepts in the discipline, and appropriateness for his/her

learners.

4.P(g): The candidate uses supplementary resources and technologies effectively to ensure accessibility and

relevance for all learners.

4.P(h): The candidate creates opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master academic language in their

content.

4.P(i): The candidate accesses school and/or district-based resources to evaluate the learner’s content knowledge

in their primary language.

Knowledge: 4.K(a): The candidate understands major concepts, assumptions, debates, processes of inquiry, and ways of

knowing that are central to the discipline(s) she/he teaches.

4.K(b): The candidate understands common misconceptions in learning the discipline and how to guide learners

to accurate conceptual understanding.

4.K(c): The candidate knows and uses the academic language of the discipline and knows how to make it

accessible to learners.

4.K(d): The candidate knows how to integrate culturally relevant content to build on learners’ background

knowledge.

4.K(e): The candidate has a deep knowledge of student content standards and learning progressions in the

discipline(s) she/he teaches.

Goal 5: Application of Content

The candidate understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical

thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem solving related to authentic local and global issues.

Performances:

5.P(a): The candidate develops and implements projects that guide learners in analyzing the complexities of an

issue or question using perspectives from varied disciplines and cross-disciplinary skills (e.g., a water quality study

that draws upon biology and chemistry to look at factual information and social studies to examine policy

implications).

5.P(b): The candidate engages learners in applying content knowledge to real world problems through the lens of

interdisciplinary themes (e.g., financial literacy, environmental literacy).

5.P(c): The candidate facilitates learners’ use of current tools and resources to maximize content learning in varied

contexts.

5.P(d): The candidate engages learners in questioning and challenging assumptions and approaches in order to

foster innovation and problem solving in local and global contexts.

5.P(e): The candidate develops learners’ communication skills in disciplinary and interdisciplinary contexts by

creating meaningful opportunities to employ a variety of forms of communication that address varied audiences

and purposes.

5.P(f): The candidate engages learners in generating and evaluating new ideas and novel approaches, seeking

inventive solutions to problems, and developing original work.

5.P(g): The candidate facilitates learners’ ability to develop diverse social and cultural perspectives that expand

their understanding of local and global issues and create novel approaches to solving problems.

5.P(h): The candidate develops and implements supports for learner literacy development across content areas.

Knowledge:

5.K(a): The candidate understands the ways of knowing in his/her discipline, how it relates to other disciplinary

approaches to inquiry, and the strengths and limitations of each approach in addressing problems, issues, and

concerns.

5.K(b): The candidate understands how current interdisciplinary themes (e.g., civic literacy, health literacy, global

awareness) connect to the core subjects and knows how to weave those themes into meaningful learning

experiences.

Page 17: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

17

5.K(c): The candidate understands the demands of accessing and managing information as well as how to evaluate

issues of ethics and quality related to information and its use.

5.K(d): The candidate understands how to use digital and interactive technologies for efficiently and effectively

achieving specific learning goals.

5.K(e): The candidate understands critical thinking processes and knows how to help learners develop high level

questioning skills to promote their independent learning.

5.K(f): The candidate understands communication modes and skills as vehicles for learning (e.g., information

gathering and processing) across disciplines as well as vehicles for expressing learning.

5.K(g): The candidate understands creative thinking processes and how to engage learners in producing original

work.

5.K(h): The candidate knows where and how to access resources to build global awareness and understanding,

and how to integrate them into the curriculum.

Goal 6: Assessment

The candidate understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to

monitor learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s and learner’s decision making.

Performances:

6.P(a): The candidate balances the use of formative and summative assessment as appropriate to support, verify,

and document learning.

6.P(b): The candidate designs assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimizes

sources of bias that can distort assessment results.

6.P(c): The candidate works independently and collaboratively to examine test and other performance data to

understand each learner’s progress and to guide planning.

6.P(d): The candidate engages learners in understanding and identifying quality work and provides them with

effective descriptive feedback to guide their progress toward that work.

6.P(e): The candidate engages learners in multiple ways of demonstrating knowledge and skills as part of the

assessment process.

6.P(f): The candidate models and structures processes that guide learners in examining their own thinking and

learning as well as the performance of others.

6.P(g): The candidate effectively uses multiple and appropriate types of assessment data to identify each student’s

learning needs and to develop differentiated learning experiences.

6.P(h): The candidate prepares all learners for the demands of particular assessment formats and makes appropriate

accommodations in assessments or testing conditions, especially for learners with disabilities and language

learning needs.

6.P(i): The candidate continually seeks appropriate ways to employ technology to support assessment practice

both to engage learners more fully and to assess and address learner needs.

Knowledge:

6.K(a): The candidate understands the differences between formative and summative applications of assessment

and knows how and when to use each.

6.K(b): The candidate understands the range of types and multiple purposes of assessment and how to design,

adapt, or select appropriate assessments to address specific learning goals and individual differences, and to

minimize sources of bias.

6.K(c): The candidate knows how to analyze assessment data to understand patterns and gaps in learning, to guide

planning and instruction, and to provide meaningful feedback to all learners.

6.K(d): The candidate knows when and how to engage learners in analyzing their own assessment results and in

helping to set goals for their own learning.

6.K(e): The candidate understands the positive impact of effective descriptive feedback for learners and knows a

variety of strategies for communicating this feedback.

6.K(f): The candidate knows when and how to evaluate and report learner progress against standards.

6.K(g): The candidate understands how to prepare learners for assessments and how to make accommodations in

assessments and testing conditions, especially for learners with disabilities and language learning needs.

Goal 7: Planning for Instruction

Page 18: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

18

The candidate plans instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon

knowledge of content areas, curriculum, cross-disciplinary skills, and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of learners and

the community context.

Performances:

7.P(a): The candidate individually and collaboratively selects and creates learning experiences that are appropriate

for curriculum goals and content standards, and are relevant to learners.

7.P(b): The candidate plans how to achieve each student’s learning goals, choosing appropriate strategies and

accommodations, resources, and materials to differentiate instruction for individuals and groups of learners

7.P(c): The candidate develops appropriate sequencing of learning experiences and provides multiple ways to

demonstrate knowledge and skill.

7.P(d): The candidate plans for instruction based on formative and summative assessment data, prior learner

knowledge, and learner interest.

7.P(e): The candidate plans collaboratively with professionals who have specialized expertise (e.g., special

educators, related service providers, language learning specialists, librarians, media specialists) to design and

jointly deliver as appropriate learning experiences to meet unique learning needs.

7.P(f): The candidate evaluates plans in relation to short- and long-range goals and systematically adjusts plans to

meet each student’s learning needs and enhance learning.

Knowledge:

7.K(a): The candidate understands content and content standards and how these are organized in the curriculum.

7.K(b): The candidate understands how integrating cross-disciplinary skills in instruction engages learners

purposefully in applying content knowledge.

7.K(c): The candidate understands learning theory, human development, cultural diversity, and individual

differences and how these impact ongoing planning.

7.K(d): The candidate understands the strengths and needs of individual learners and how to plan instruction that

is responsive to these strengths and needs.

7.K(e): The candidate knows a range of evidence-based instructional strategies, resources, and technological tools

and how to use them effectively to plan instruction that meets diverse learning needs.

7.K(f): The candidate knows when and how to adjust plans based on assessment information and learner responses.

7.K(g): The candidate knows when and how to access resources and collaborate with others to support student

learning (e.g., special educators, related service providers, language learner specialists, librarians, media

specialists, community organizations).

Goal 8: Instructional Strategies

The candidate understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep

understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways.

Performances:

8.P(a): The candidate uses appropriate strategies and resources to adapt instruction to the needs of individuals and

groups of learners.

8.P(b): The candidate continuously monitors student learning, engages learners in assessing their progress, and

adjusts instruction in response to student learning needs.

8.P(c): The candidate collaborates with learners to design and implement relevant learning experiences, identify

their strengths, and access family and community resources to develop their areas of interest.

8.P(d): The candidate varies his/her role in the instructional process (e.g., instructor, facilitator, coach, audience)

in relation to the content and purposes of instruction and the needs of learners.

8.P(e): The candidate provides multiple models and representations of concepts and skills with opportunities for

learners to demonstrate their knowledge through a variety of products and performances.

8.P(f): The candidate engages all learners in developing higher order questioning skills and metacognitive

processes. 8.P(g): The candidate engages learners in using a range of learning skills and technology tools to

access, interpret, evaluate, and apply information.

8.P(h): The candidate uses a variety of instructional strategies to support and expand learners’ communication

through speaking, listening, reading, writing, and other modes.

8.P(i): The candidate asks questions to stimulate discussion that serves different purposes (e.g., probing for learner

understanding, helping learners articulate their ideas and thinking processes, stimulating curiosity, and helping

learners to question).

Knowledge:

Page 19: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

19

8.K(a): The candidate understands the cognitive processes associated with various kinds of learning (e.g., critical

and creative thinking, problem framing and problem solving, invention, memorization and recall) and how these

processes can be stimulated.

8.K(b): The candidate knows how to apply a range of developmentally, culturally, and linguistically appropriate

instructional strategies to achieve learning goals.

8.K(c): The candidate knows when and how to use appropriate strategies to differentiate instruction and engage

all learners in complex thinking and meaningful tasks.

8.K(d): The candidate understands how multiple forms of communication (oral, written, nonverbal, digital, visual)

convey ideas, foster self-expression, and build relationships.

8.K(e): The candidate knows how to use a wide variety of resources, including human and technological, to engage

students in learning.

8.K(f): The candidate understands how content and skill development can be supported by media and technology

and knows how to evaluate these resources for quality, accuracy, and effectiveness.

Goal 9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice

The candidate engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice,

particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (learners, families, other professionals, and the

community), and adapts practice to meet the needs of each learner.

Performances:

9.P(a): The candidate engages in ongoing learning opportunities to develop knowledge and skills in order to

provide all learners with engaging curriculum and learning experiences based on local and state standards.

9.P(b): The candidate engages in meaningful and appropriate professional learning experiences aligned with

his/her own needs and the needs of the learners, school, and system.

9.P(c): Independently and in collaboration with colleagues, the candidate uses a variety of data (e.g., systematic

observation, information about learners, research) to evaluate the outcomes of teaching and learning and to adapt

planning and practice.

9.P(d): The candidate actively seeks professional, community, and technological resources, within and outside

the school, as supports for analysis, reflection, and problem-solving.

9.P(e): The candidate reflects on his/her personal biases and accesses resources to deepen his/her own

understanding of cultural, ethnic, gender, and learning differences to build stronger relationships and create more

relevant learning experiences.

9.P(f): The candidate advocates, models, and teaches safe, legal, and ethical use of information and technology

including appropriate documentation of sources and respect for others in the use of social media.

Knowledge:

9.K(a): The candidate understands and knows how to use a variety of self-assessment and problem-solving

strategies to analyze and reflect on his/her practice and to plan for adaptations/adjustments.

9.K(b): The candidate knows how to use learner data to analyze practice and differentiate instruction accordingly.

9.K(c): The candidate understands how personal identity, worldview, and prior experience affect perceptions and

expectations, and recognizes how they may bias behaviors and interactions with others.

9.K(d): The candidate understands laws related to learners’ rights and teacher responsibilities (e.g., for educational

equity, appropriate education for learners with disabilities, confidentiality, privacy, appropriate treatment of

learners, reporting in situations related to possible child abuse).

9.K(e): The candidate knows how to build and implement a plan for professional growth directly aligned with

his/her needs as a growing professional using feedback from teacher evaluations and observations, data on learner

performance, and school- and system-wide priorities.

Goal 10: Leadership and Collaboration

The candidate seeks appropriate leadership roles and opportunities to take responsibility for student learning, to

collaborate with learners, families, colleagues, other school professionals, and community members to ensure learner

growth, and to advance the profession.

Performances:

10.P(a): The candidate takes an active role on the instructional team, giving and receiving feedback on practice,

examining learner work, analyzing data from multiple sources, and sharing responsibility for decision-making and

accountability for each student’s learning.

10.P(b): The candidate works with other school professionals to plan and jointly facilitate learning on how to meet

diverse needs of learners.

Page 20: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

20

10.P(c): The candidate engages collaboratively in the school-wide effort to build a shared vision and supportive

culture, identify common goals, and monitor and evaluate progress toward those goals.

10.P(d): The candidate works collaboratively with learners and their families to establish mutual expectations and

ongoing communication to support learner development and achievement.

10.P(e): Working with school colleagues, the candidate builds ongoing connections with community resources to

enhance student learning and well-being.

10.P(f): The candidate engages in professional learning, contributes to the knowledge and skill of others, and

works collaboratively to advance professional practice.

10.P(g): The candidate uses technological tools and a variety of communication strategies to build local and global

learning communities that engage learners, families, and colleagues.

10.P(h): The candidate uses and generates meaningful research on education issues and policies.

10.P(i): The candidate seeks appropriate opportunities to model effective practice for colleagues, to lead

professional learning activities, and to serve in other leadership roles.

10.P(j): The candidate advocates to meet the needs of learners, to strengthen the learning environment, and to

enact system change.

10.P(k): The candidate takes on leadership roles at the school, district, state, and/or national level and advocates

for learners, the school, the community, and the profession.

Knowledge:

10.K(a): The candidate understands schools as organizations within a historical , cultural, political, and social

context and knows how to work with others across the system to support learners.

10.K(b): The candidate understands that alignment of family, school, and community spheres of influence

enhances student learning and that discontinuity in these spheres of influence interferes with learning.

10.K(c): The candidate knows how to work with other adults and has developed skills in collaborative interaction

appropriate for both face-to-face and virtual contexts.

10.K(d): The candidate knows how to contribute to a common culture that supports high expectations for student

learning.

Page 21: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

21

Appendix B

Professional Disposition Form

The Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) Standard 1 requires that education professionals

exhibit professional dispositions. Candidates recommended from LMU to be certified by Tennessee must

exhibit professional dispositions in their interactions with all stakeholders, including classmates, P-12

cooperating classroom teachers, P-12 administrators, cooperating teachers, students, and university faculty,

staff and supervisors while in the university environment and in field placements.

Teacher Candidate’s Name: Date:

University Class (Prefix/Course Number): / Semester / Year /

Evaluator Name: Position:

CHECK Self/

Student: Professional Education

Faculty: P-12 School

Personnel:

RATE THE DISPOSITION INDICATOR STATEMENTS BY PLACING AN X IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX

4 = Above Expectations; 3 = At Expectations; 2 = Below Expectations;

1 = Significantly Below Expectations; 0 = Not Applicable.

Explain Below Expectations (1 or 2) Evaluation Scores at the end of the form in the comment section and document an

Action Plan for improvement of these scores. Also, document if such plan is accomplished at end of semester.

A. Attendance and Punctuality 4 3 2 1 0

Meets attendance requirements

Arrives at required time/Remains until required departure time

Comments:

B. Initiative 4 3 2 1 0

Demonstrates self-initiative

Has good ideas, works with limited supervision

Creative and resourceful

Works independently, when appropriate, of cohorts/teammates

Comments:

C. Work Habits 4 3 2 1 0

Completes lesson plans/forms/assignments correctly and on time

Responsible, attends to necessary paperwork, makes no excuses except under dire distress

Works independently needing a minimum of help

Demonstrates commitment to achieve professional, program of studies’ goals*

Reaches beyond the minimum and does excellent work

Engages in and values both long term and short term planning*

Effectively uses instructional technology in the field placement/university classes*

Committed to reflection, assessment, and learning as an ongoing process

Establishes and maintains a positive climate in the field placement/university classes *

Observes modeling of cooperating classroom teachers and effectively uses modeling techniques

in the field placement/university classes*

Page 22: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

22

Comments:

D. Oral Communications 4 3 2 1 0

Easily express self

Articulate, uses standard English grammar without colloquial expressions

Recognizes power of language for fostering self-expression, identity development, and learning*

Thoughtful and responsive listener*

Comments:

E. Written Communication Skills 4 3 2 1 0

Written work uses standard English grammar without colloquial expressions

Writing is clear and organized

Frequently and effectively communicates with others

Comments:

F. Collegiality 4 3 2 1 0

Works well on a team while encouraging, assisting, and inspiring peers to excel*

Values planning as a collegial activity*

Willing to give and receive help*

Comments:

G. Respect (in action and speech) 4 3 2 1 0

Does not create classroom disruptions (such as using cell phone)

Diplomatic, sensitive to other’s needs

Avoids sharing information that is confidential*

Demonstrates respect to all stakeholders as defined on first page

Demonstrates respect for diverse and individual cultures*

Participates in discussions, shares ideas and opinions

Comments:

H. Commitment to Profession 4 3 2 1 0

Strives to promote a caring, non-discriminatory, and equitable environment.

Seeks help from others to develop professional skills

Attempts to implement suggestions for improvement without being defensive

Interested in profession and displays enthusiasm for improving one’s own skills

Actions imply commitment to teaching

Committed to continuous learning and engages in professional discourse about subject matter

knowledge and students’ learning of the discipline*

Makes positive decisions about professional growth and development *

Makes positive changes in attitude suggested by instructors

Comments:

I. Professionalism in Clinical and Field Placement (Ethics, professional

growth, and confidentiality) 4 3 2 1 0

Dresses appropriately (initial licensure students) Records (i.e., observation logs, journals, applications, etc.) are accurate without any misrepresentation of

facts

Page 23: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

23

All documents are free of any plagiarism* Adheres to all rules and requirements and supports decisions made by the Carter & Moyers School of

Education*

Demonstrates honesty and integrity in all circumstances*

Comments:

Comment Section Regarding Weakness(es) (if applicable):

Action Plan (if weakness cited): (Teacher candidate must complete with person filling out the

disposition checklist.)

____Accomplished _____ Not accomplished

Teacher Candidate Signature: Date:

Faculty/Teacher Signature: Date:

Page 24: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

24

Appendix C

Lesson Plan Format Lincoln Memorial University

Name of Candidate __________________________________ Date of Lesson______________________________________ Title of Lesson/Unit__________________________________ Grade/Subject______________________________________

State /Common Core Standard(s) Learning Target(s) (e.g., Essential Question, Goal, I Can Statement): What should the student be able to answer and do at the end of the lesson?

Objectives(s): Clear, Specific, Observable, Demanding, High Quality, Measurable, Aligned to Standard(s) Theory/Reflection: Which learning theorist(s) will be the basis for your planning/instruction? Theorist:

How was his/her theory used in the lesson?

Materials/Technology: What do you need for this lesson? Identify the specific technologies that you AND your students will use. Instructional Procedures: Hook/Motivator (How will you engage students’ attention and focus on learning?): Step-by-Step Procedures (What will the teacher and student be doing during the lesson (e.g., direct instruction, modeling, questioning, grouping strategies, differentiated strategies, etc.): Differentiated Instruction Strategies:

(Please Check)

Undergraduate: _____ or

MEd: ______

Page 25: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

25

Assessment/Evaluation: Students should show evidence of proficiency through a variety of assessments. These should be aligned with the objectives. Formative Assessment(s) (Required): Summative Assessment (If Applicable): Co-Teaching Strategies: Circle all that apply AND explain. One Teach, One Observe: One Teach, One Assist: Station Teaching: Parallel Teaching: Supplemental Teaching: Alternative (Differentiated): Team Teaching:

Closure/Wrap Up: (summarizing, reminding, reflecting, restating, connecting) Cross-Curricular Connections: Show connections to other disciplines/subjects, if applicable. List standards, activities, and assessments that connect with other subject areas. Reflection: (After teaching the lesson)

____________________________________________________________________________________

Page 26: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

26

Appendix D

Modified TEAM Evaluation Rubrics

NOTE: Evaluation standards are directly connected to the goals and performance expectations, the

Institutional Standards (IS), and linked to the Tennessee Licensure Standards (TLS), and Interstate

Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) standards.

Planning Rubric

Above Expectations

4

At Expectations

3

Below

Expectations 2

Significantly

Below

Expectations 1

Not

Observed

0

Not

Applicable

N/A

Instructional

Plans

TLS: 1, 2, 7

InTASC: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,

8, 9

Instructional plans

include:

measurable and

explicit goals aligned to state

content standards;

activities,

materials, and

assessments that:

o are aligned to state standards.

o are sequenced

from basic to complex.

o build on prior

student knowledge, are

relevant to

students’ lives, and integrate

other disciplines.

o provide appropriate time

for student work, student

reflection, and

lesson and unit closure.

evidence that plan

is appropriate for the age,

knowledge, and

interests of all learners;

evidence that the plan provides

regular

opportunities to accommodate

individual student

needs.

Instructional plans

include:

measurable

and explicit goals aligned

to state content

standards;

activities,

materials, and

assessments that:

o are aligned to

state standards. o are sequenced

from basic to

complex. o build on prior

student

knowledge, are relevant to

students’ lives,

and integrate other

disciplines. o provide

appropriate

time for student work,

student

reflection, and lesson and unit

closure.

Instructional plans

include:

goals aligned to

state content standards;

activities,

materials, and

assessments

that:

o are aligned to state standards.

o are sequenced

from basic to complex.

o build on prior

student knowledge.

o provide

appropriate time for student

work, and

lesson and unit closure.

evidence that plan is

appropriate for

the age, knowledge, and

interests of

most learners;

evidence that

the plan provides some

opportunities to

accommodate individual

student needs.

Instructional plans

include:

few goals

aligned to state content

standards;

activities,

materials, and

assessments that:

o are rarely aligned to state

standards.

o are rarely logically

sequenced.

o rarely build on prior student

knowledge.

o inconsistently provide time for

student work,

and lesson and unit closure.

little evidence that the plan is

appropriate for

the age, knowledge, or

interests of the

learners;

little evidence

that the plan provides some

opportunities to

accommodate individual

student needs.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Page 27: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

27

Planning Rubric, Page 2 of 2

Above Expectations

4

At Expectations

3

Below Expectations

2

Significantly

Below Expectations

1

Not

Observed

0

Not

Applicable

N/A

Student Work

TLS: 7

InTASC: 5, 6, 7

Planned assignments require students to:

organize, interpret, analyze,

synthesize, and

evaluate information rather

than reproduce it;

draw conclusions, make

generalizations,

and produce arguments that are

supported through

extended writing;

connect what they

are learning to

experiences,

observations,

feelings, or situations

significant in their

daily lives both inside and outside

of school.

Planned assignments require students to:

interpret information

rather than

reproduce it;

draw

conclusions

and produce arguments that

are supported

through writing;

connect what they are

learning to

prior learning

and some life

experiences.

Planned assignments require

students to:

demonstrate application of

information rather than

reproduce it;

draw conclusions and

support them

through writing;

connect what

they are learning to prior

learning and

some life

experiences.

Planned assignments require

students to:

mostly reproduce information;

rarely draw conclusions and

support them

through writing;

rarely connect

what they are learning to prior

learning or life

experiences.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not applicable

for this

lesson

Assessment

TLS: 2, 7, 8

InTASC: 1, 2, 6

Assessment plans:

are aligned with

state content

standards;

have clear

measurement criteria;

measure student performance in

more than three

ways (e.g.,

project,

experiment,

presentation, essay, short

answer, or

multiple choice test);

require written tasks;

address clear

illustrations of student progress

toward state

content standard;

include

descriptions of how assessment

results will be

used to guide future instruction.

Assessment plans:

are aligned

with state

content standards;

measure student

performance

(e.g., project, experiment,

presentation,

essay, short answer, or

multiple choice

test);

include

performance checks

throughout the

school year.

Assessment plans:

are aligned with

state content

standards;

have

measurement criteria;

measure student performance

(e.g., project,

experiment,

presentation,

essay, short

answer, or multiple choice

test).

Assessment plans:

are rarely aligned

with state content

standards;

have ambiguous

measurement criteria;

include performance

checks, although

the purpose of

these checks is

not clear.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not applicable

for this

lesson

Page 28: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

28

Environment Rubric

Above

Expectations

4

At Expectations

3

Below

Expectations

2

Significantly

Below

Expectations

1

Not

Observed

0

Not

Applicable

N/A

Expectations

TLS: 1, 5

InTASC: 1,

2, 3, 8

Teacher sets

high and

demanding

academic

expectations for

every student.

Teacher

encourages

students to

learn from

mistakes.

Teacher creates

learning

opportunities

where all

students can

experience

success.

Students take

initiative and

follow through

with their own

work.

Teacher

optimizes

instructional

time and

demands better

performance

from every

student.

Teacher sets

high and

demanding

academic

expectations

for every

student.

Teacher

encourages

students to

learn from

mistakes.

Teacher creates

learning

opportunities

where all

students can

experience

success.

Students take

initiative and

follow through

with their own

work.

Teacher sets

high and

demanding

academic

expectations for

every student.

Teacher

encourages

students to learn

from mistakes.

Teacher creates

learning

opportunities

where most

students can

experience

success.

Students

complete their

work according

to teacher

expectations.

Teacher

expectations

are not

sufficiently

high for every

student.

Teacher

creates an

environment

where

mistakes and

failure are not

viewed as

learning

experiences.

Students

demonstrate

little or no

pride in the

quality of their

work.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Classroom

TLS: 5

InTASC: 2,

3

Environment:

welcomes all

members and

guests;

is organized

and

understandable

to all students;

provides

supplies,

equipment, and

resources that

are easily and

readily

accessible and

used

effectively;

displays work

of all students.

Environment:

welcomes most

members and

guests;

is organized

and

understandable

to most

students;

provides

supplies,

equipment, and

resources that

are easily and

readily

accessible;

displays

student work.

Environment:

is organized

and

understandable

to some

students;

provides

supplies,

equipment,

and resources

that are

accessible;

displays

student work.

Environment:

is somewhat

cold and

uninviting;

is not well

organized and

understandable

to students;

provides

supplies,

equipment,

and resources

that are

difficult to

access;

does not

display student

work.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not applicable

for this

lesson

Page 29: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

29

Environment Rubric, Page 2 of 2

Above Expectations

4

At Expectations

3

Below

Expectations

2

Significantly

Below

Expectations

1

Not

Observed

0

Not

Applicable

N/A

Managing

Student

Behavior

TLS: 5

InTASC: 2, 3

Students are

consistently well-behaved and on

task.

Teacher and students establish

clear rules for

learning and behavior.

The teacher uses several techniques,

such as social

approval, contingent

activities, and

consequences, to

maintain

appropriate

student behavior.

The teacher

overlooks inconsequential

behavior.

The teacher deals with students who

have caused disruptions rather

than the entire

class.

The teacher

attends to

disruptions quickly and

firmly.

Students are

mostly well-behaved and on

task.

Teacher and students

establish rules

for learning and behavior.

The teacher uses some

techniques, such

as social approval,

contingent

activities, and

consequences,

to maintain

appropriate student

behavior.

The teacher overlooks some

inconsequential behavior.

The teacher deals with

students who

have caused disruptions.

Students are

mostly well-behaved and on

task, some

minor learning disruptions

may occur.

Teacher establishes

rules for

learning and behavior.

The teacher uses some

techniques,

such as social

approval,

contingent

activities, and consequences,

to maintain

appropriate student

behavior.

The teacher overlooks some

inconsequential behavior, but at

other times

addresses it, stopping the

lesson.

The teacher deals with

students who

have caused

disruptions, yet

sometimes he or she

addresses the

entire class.

Students are not

well-behaved and are often off

task.

Teacher establishes few

rules for learning

and behavior.

The teacher uses

few techniques to maintain

appropriate

student behavior.

The teacher

cannot distinguish

between

inconsequential behavior and

inappropriate

behavior.

Disruptions

frequently interrupt

instruction.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable

for this lesson

Respective Culture

TLS: 3, 9, 10 InTASC: 1, 2,

3, 9, 10

Teacher-student interactions

demonstrate caring and respect for one

another.

Students exhibit caring and respect

for one another.

Teacher seeks out

the interests and opinions of all

students.

Positive relationships and

interdependence

characterize the classroom.

Teacher-student interactions are

generally friendly.

Students exhibit respect for the

teacher, and are

generally polite to each other.

Teacher is usually receptive to the

interests and

opinions of students.

Teacher-student

interactions are generally

friendly, but

may reflect occasional

inconsistencies,

or favoritism.

Students

exhibit respect for the teacher,

and are polite

to each other.

Teacher is

receptive to the interests and

opinions of

students.

Teacher-student interactions are

authoritarian, negative, or

inappropriate.

Students exhibit respect for the

teacher.

Student

interaction is characterized by

conflict,

sarcasm, or put-downs.

Teacher is not

receptive to interests and

opinions of

students.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not applicable

for this

lesson

Page 30: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

30

Instruction Rubric

Above Expectations

4

At Expectations

3

Below

Expectations

2

Significantly

Below

Expectations

1

Not

Observed

0

Not

Applicable

N/A

Standard and Objectives

TLS: 1, 7 InTASC: 1, 3,

6, 7

All learning objectives and

state content

standards are explicitly

communicated.

Instructional objectives are: (a)

consistently connected to what

students have

previously learned, (b) know

from life

experiences, and (c) integrated

with other

disciplines.

Expectations for

student performance are

clear, demanding,

and high.

State standards

are displayed and referenced

throughout the

lesson.

There is evidence

that most students

demonstrate mastery of

objective.

All learning objectives and

state content

standards are explicitly

communicated.

Instructional objectives are: (a)

consistently connected to what

students have

previously learned, (b) know

from life

experiences.

State standards

are displayed and referenced

throughout the

lesson.

There is evidence

that many students

demonstrate

mastery of objective.

Most learning objectives and

state content

standards are communicated.

Instructional objectives are

connected to

what students have previously

learned.

Expectations for student

performance are clear.

State standards

are displayed.

There is

evidence that some students

demonstrate

mastery of the objective.

Few instructional

objectives and

state content standards are

communicated.

Instructional objectives are

rarely connected to what students

have previously

learned.

Expectations for

student performance are

vague.

State standards are displayed.

There is evidence that

few students

demonstrate mastery of the

objective.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not applicable

for this

lesson

Motivating Students

TLS: 2, 5 InTASC: 1, 2,

3, 5, 8

The teacher organizes the

content so that it is personally

meaningful and

relevant to all students.

The teacher

develops learning experiences

where inquiry,

curiosity, and exploration are

valued.

The teacher

regularly

reinforces and rewards efforts of

all students.

The teacher organizes the

content so that it is personally

meaningful and

relevant to the majority of the

students.

The teacher develops learning

experiences

where inquiry, curiosity, and

exploration are valued.

The teacher

reinforces and rewards efforts of

all students.

The teacher attempts to

organize the content so that it

is personally

meaningful and relevant to the

majority of the

students.

The teacher

sometimes

develops learning

experiences where inquiry,

curiosity, and

exploration are valued.

The teacher

sometimes

reinforces and

rewards effort.

The teacher attempts to

organize the content so that it

is personally

meaningful and relevant to

students.

The teacher attempts to

develop learning

experiences where inquiry,

curiosity, and exploration are

valued.

The teacher attempts to

reinforce and

reward effort.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not applicable

for this

lesson

Page 31: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

31

Instruction Rubric, Page 2 of 8

Above Expectations 4

At Expectations 3

Below Expectations

2

Significantly

Below Expectations

1

Not

Observed 0

Not

Applicable N/A

Presenting

Instructional Content

TLS: 1, 4 InTASC: 1, 5,

8

Presentation of

content always includes:

visuals that establish the

purpose of the

lesson, preview the organization

of the lesson, and

include internal summaries of the

lesson;

examples, illustrations,

analogies, and labels for new

concepts and

ideas;

modeling by the

teacher to demonstrate his or

her performance

expectations;

concise

communication;

logical sequencing and

segmenting;

all essential

information;

no irrelevant,

confusing, or non-essential

information.

Presentation of

content most of the time includes:

visuals that establish the

purpose of the

lesson, preview the organization

of the lesson, and

include internal summaries of the

lesson;

examples, illustrations,

analogies, and labels for new

concepts and

ideas;

modeling by the

teacher to demonstrate his

or her

performance expectations;

concise

communication;

logical

sequencing and segmenting;

all essential information;

no irrelevant, confusing, or

non-essential

information.

Presentation of

content some of the time includes:

visuals that establish the

purpose of the

lesson, preview the organization

of the lesson,

and include internal

summaries of the

lesson;

examples,

illustrations, analogies, and

labels for new

concepts and ideas;

modeling by the teacher to

demonstrate his

or her performance

expectations;

concise communication;

logical sequencing and

segmenting;

all essential information;

no irrelevant, confusing, or

non-essential information.

Presentation of

content rarely includes:

visuals that establish the

purpose of the

lesson, preview the organization

of the lesson,

and include internal

summaries of the

lesson;

examples,

illustrations, analogies, and

labels for new

concepts and ideas;

modeling by the teacher to

demonstrate his

or her performance

expectations;

concise communication;

logical sequencing and

segmenting;

all essential information;

no irrelevant, confusing, or

non-essential information.

Appropriate

but not evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Lesson

Structure and

Pacing

TLS: 2, 4

InTASC: 2

The lesson starts

promptly.

The lesson's

structure is

coherent, with a beginning,

middle, end, and time for

reflection.

Pacing is brisk and provides

many

opportunities for individual

students who

progress at different learning

rates.

Routines for distributing

materials are seamless.

No instructional time is lost during

transitions.

The lesson starts

promptly.

The lesson's

structure is

coherent, with a beginning,

middle, and end.

Pacing is

appropriate and

provides opportunities for

students who

progress at different learning

rates.

Routines for distributing

materials are efficient.

No instructional time is lost during

transitions.

The lesson starts

promptly.

The lesson has a

structure, but

may be missing closure or

introductory elements.

Pacing is

appropriate and sometimes

provides

opportunities for students who

progress at

different learning rates.

Routines for distributing

materials are

efficient.

Little

instructional time is lost

during

transitions.

The lesson does

not start promptly.

The lesson has a

structure, but may be missing

closure and introductory

elements.

Pacing is appropriate for

few of the

students and rarely provides

opportunities for

students who progress at

different learning

rates.

Routines for

distributing materials are

disruptive.

Considerable time is lost

during transitions.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable

for this lesson

Page 32: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

32

Instruction Rubric, Page 3 of 8

Above Expectations 4

At Expectations 3

Below Expectations

2

Significantly

Below Expectations

1

Not

Observed 0

Not

Applicable N/A

Activities and

Materials

TLS: 1, 2, 4,

11 InTASC: 1, 2,

4, 5, 6, 8

Activities and

materials support the lesson objectives and

include all of the

following:

are challenging;

sustain students’ attention;

elicit a variety of thinking;

provide time for reflection;

are relevant to students’ lives;

provide opportunities for

student-to-student

interaction;

induce student

curiosity and

suspense;

provide students

with choices;

incorporate

multimedia and technology;

incorporate

resources beyond the school

curriculum texts

(e.g., teacher-made materials,

manipulatives,

resources from

museums, cultural

centers);

uses activities that

are game-like,

involve simulations,

require creating

products, and demand self-

direction and self-

monitoring.

Activities and

materials support the lesson objectives

and include most of

the following;

are challenging;

sustain students’ attention;

elicit a variety of thinking;

provide time for reflection;

are relevant to students’ lives;

provide opportunities for

student to student

interaction;

induce student

curiosity and

suspense;

provide students

with choices;

incorporate

multimedia and technology;

incorporate

resources beyond the school

curriculum texts

(e.g., teacher-made materials,

manipulatives,

resources from

museums,

cultural centers).

Activities and

materials support the lesson

objectives and

include some of the following;

elicit a variety of thinking;

provide time for reflection;

are relevant to students’ lives;

provide

opportunities for student to

student

interaction;

induce student

curiosity and suspense;

provide students with choices;

incorporate

multimedia and technology; and

incorporate resources

beyond the

school curriculum texts

(e.g., teacher

made materials, manipulatives,

resources from

museums, cultural centers).

Activities and

materials support the lesson

objectives but are

limited in nature.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Page 33: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

33

Instruction Rubric, Page 4 of 8

Above Expectations 4

At Expectations 3

Below Expectations

2

Significantly

Below Expectations

1

Not

Observed 0

Not

Applicable N/A

Questioning

TLS: 1, 2, 4, 6

InTASC: 1, 2,

5, 6, 8

Teacher questions are varied and

high quality,

providing a balanced mix of

question types:

o knowledge and comprehension;

o application and

analysis; o creation and

evaluation.

Questions are consistently

purposeful and coherent.

A high frequency of questions is

asked.

Questions are consistently

sequenced with

attention to the instructional

goals.

Questions regularly require

active responses (e.g., whole class

signaling, choral

responses, written and shared

responses, or

group and individual

answers).

Wait time (3-5 seconds) is

consistently provided.

The teacher calls on volunteers and

non-volunteers

and a balance of students based on

ability and sex.

Students generate questions that

lead to further

inquiry and self-directed learning.

Teacher questions are varied and

high quality

providing for some, but not all,

question types:

o knowledge and comprehension;

o application and

analysis; o creation and

evaluation.

Questions are usually

purposeful and coherent.

A moderate frequency of

questions asked.

Questions are sometimes

sequenced with

attention to the instructional

goals.

Questions sometimes

require active responses (e.g.,

whole class

signaling, choral responses, or

group and

individual answers).

Wait time is sometimes

provided.

The teacher calls on volunteers and

non-volunteers and a balance of

students based on

ability and sex.

Teacher questions are

varied providing

for some, but not all, question

types:

o knowledge and comprehension;

o application and

analysis; o creation and

evaluation.

Questions are usually

purposeful and coherent.

A moderate frequency of

questions asked.

Questions are sometimes

sequenced with

attention to the instructional

goals.

Questions sometimes

require active responses (e.g.,

whole class

signaling, choral responses, or

group and

individual answers).

Wait time is sometimes

provided.

The teacher calls on volunteers

and non-volunteers and a

balance of

students based on ability and

sex.

Teacher questions are

inconsistent in

quality and include few

question types:

o knowledge and comprehension;

o application and

analysis; o creation and

evaluation.

Questions are random and lack

coherence.

A low frequency

of questions is asked.

Questions are

rarely sequenced with attention to

the instructional

goals.

Questions rarely

require active responses (e.g.,

whole class

signaling, choral responses, or

group and

individual answers).

Wait time is inconsistently

provided.

The teacher mostly calls on

volunteers and high-ability

students.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Page 34: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

34

Instruction Rubric, Page 5 of 8

Above Expectations 4

At Expectations 3

Below Expectations

2

Significantly

Below Expectations

1

Not

Observed 0

Not

Applicable N/A

Academic Feedback

TLS: 2, 4, 6 InTASC: 2,

6, 8

Oral and written feedback is

consistently academically

focused, frequent,

and high quality.

Feedback is

frequently given during guided

practice and

homework review.

The teacher

circulates to prompt student

thinking, assess

each student’s

progress, and

provide individual

feedback.

Feedback from students is

regularly used to

monitor and adjust instruction.

Teacher engages students in giving

specific and high

quality feedback to one another.

Oral and written feedback is

mostly academically

focused,

frequent, and mostly high

quality.

Feedback is sometimes given

during guided practice and

homework

review.

The teacher

circulates during

instructional

activities to

support engagement, and

monitor student

work.

Feedback from

students is used

to monitor and adjust instruction.

Teacher engages students in giving

specific feedback

to one another.

Oral and written feedback is

mostly academically

focused.

Feedback is sometimes given

during guided practice and

homework

review.

The teacher

circulates during

instructional activities to

support

engagement, and

monitor student

work.

Feedback from

students is

sometimes used to monitor and

adjust

instruction.

The quality and timeliness of

feedback is inconsistent.

Feedback is rarely given

during guided

practice and homework

review.

The teacher circulates during

instructional

activities, but monitors mostly

behavior.

Feedback from

students is rarely

used to monitor or adjust

instruction.

Appropriate but not

evident

Not applicable

for this

lesson

Grouping

Students

TLS: 2, 5

InTASC: 1, 2, 3, 8

The instructional

grouping arrangements

maximize student

understanding and learning

efficiency.

All students in groups know

their roles, responsibilities,

and group work

expectations.

All students

participating in groups are held

accountable for

group and individual work.

Group composition is

varied to best

accomplish the goals of the

lesson.

Instructional groups facilitate

opportunities for

students to set goals and

evaluate their

learning.

The instructional

grouping arrangements

adequately

enhance student understanding

and learning

efficiency.

Most students in

groups know their roles,

responsibilities,

and group work expectations.

Most students participating in

groups are held

accountable for group work and

individual work.

Instructional group

composition is varied (e.g., race,

gender, ability,

age) to most of the time,

accomplish the

goals of the lesson.

The instructional

grouping arrangements

enhance student

understanding and learning

efficiency.

Some students in groups know

their roles, responsibilities,

and group work

expectations.

Some students

participating in groups are held

accountable for

group work and individual work.

Instructional group

composition is

varied (e.g., race, gender,

ability, age) to

most of the time, accomplish the

goals of the

lesson.

The instructional

grouping arrangements

inhibit student

understanding and learning

efficiency.

Few students in groups know

their roles, responsibilities,

and group work

expectations.

Few students

participating in groups are held

accountable for

group work and individual work.

Instructional group

composition

remains unchanged

irrespective of

the learning and instructional

goals of a

lesson.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Page 35: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

35

Instruction Rubric. Page 6 of 8

Above Expectations 4

At Expectations 3

Below Expectations

2

Significantly

Below Expectations

1

Not

Observed 0

Not

Applicable N/A

Teacher

Content Knowledge

TLS: 1 InTASC: 4, 5

Teacher displays extensive content

knowledge of

subject.

Teacher regularly

implements a variety of subject

specific

instructional strategies to

enhance student

content knowledge.

The teacher regularly

highlights key

concepts and ideas and uses

them as bases to

connect other powerful ideas.

Teacher displays accurate and

broad content

knowledge of subject.

Teacher implements a

variety of subject

specific instructional

strategies.

The teacher highlights key

concepts and ideas and uses

them as bases to

connect other powerful ideas.

Teacher displays accurate content

knowledge of

subject.

Teacher

sometimes implements

subject-specific

instructional strategies to

enhance student

content knowledge.

The teacher sometimes

highlights key

concepts and ideas and uses

them as bases to

connect other ideas.

Teacher displays under-developed

content

knowledge in subject area.

Teacher rarely implements

subject-specific

instructional strategies to

enhance student

content knowledge.

Teacher does not understand key

concepts and

ideas in the discipline and

therefore

presents content in a disconnected

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Teacher

Knowledge of Students

TLS: 3, 7 InTASC: 1, 2

Teacher practices display

understanding of

each student’s anticipated

learning

difficulties.

Teacher practices

regularly incorporate

student interests

and cultural heritage.

Teacher regularly

provides differentiated

instructional methods and

content to ensure

children have the opportunity to

master what is

being taught.

Teacher practices display

understanding of

student anticipated

learning

difficulties.

Teacher practices

incorporate student interests

and cultural

heritage.

Teacher provides

differentiated

instructional methods and

content to ensure children have the

opportunity to

master what is being taught.

Teacher practices display

understanding of

some student anticipated

learning

difficulties.

Teacher

practices sometimes

incorporate

student interests and cultural

heritage.

Teacher sometimes

provides differentiated

instructional

methods and content to ensure

children have the

opportunity to master what is

being taught.

Teacher practices

demonstrate

minimal knowledge of

students

anticipated learning

difficulties.

Teacher practices rarely

incorporate student interests

or cultural

heritage.

Teacher

practices demonstrate

little

differentiation of instructional

methods or

content.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Page 36: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

36

Instruction Rubric, Page 7 of 8

Above Expectations 4

At Expectations 3

Below Expectations

2

Significantly

Below Expectations

1

Not

Observed 0

Not

Applicable N/A

Thinking

TLS: 1, 2, 4

InTASC: 1, 5,

6, 8

The teacher thoroughly

teaches three or

more types of thinking:

o analytical

thinking, where students

analyze,

compare and contrast, and

evaluate and

explain information;

o practical

thinking, where

students use,

apply, and

implement what they learn in

real-life

scenarios; o creative

thinking, where

students create, design,

imagine, and suppose;

o research-based

thinking, where students explore

and review a

variety of ideas, models, and

solutions to

problems.

The teacher

provides

opportunities where students:

o generate a

variety of ideas and

alternatives; o analyze

problems from

multiple perspectives

and viewpoints;

o monitor their thinking to

ensure

understanding and are aware

of the learning

strategies that they are using

and why.

The teacher thoroughly

teaches two types

of thinking: o analytical

thinking, where

students analyze,

compare and

contrast, and evaluate and

explain

information; o practical

thinking, where

students use,

apply, and

implement

what they learn in real-life

scenarios;

o creative thinking, where

students create,

design, imagine, and

suppose; o research-based

thinking, where

students explore and

review a variety

of ideas, models, and

solutions to

problems.

The teacher

provides

opportunities where students:

o generate a

variety of ideas and

alternatives; o analyze

problems from

multiple perspectives

and

viewpoints.

The teacher thoroughly

teaches one type

of thinking: o analytical

thinking, where

students analyze,

compare and

contrast, and evaluate and

explain

information; o practical

thinking, where

students use,

apply, and

implement

what they learn in real-life

scenarios;

o creative thinking, where

students create,

design, imagine, and

suppose; o research-based

thinking, where

students explore and

review a

variety of ideas, models,

and solutions to

problems.

The teacher

provides

opportunities where students:

o generate a

variety of ideas and

alternatives; o analyze

problems from

multiple perspectives

and viewpoints.

The teacher implements

learning

experiences that thoroughly teach

any type of

thinking.

The teacher

provides opportunities

where students:

o generate a variety of ideas

and

alternatives; or o analyze

problems from

multiple perspectives

and viewpoints.

Appropriate

but not

evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Page 37: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

37

Instruction Rubric, Page 8 of 8

Above Expectations

4

At Expectations 3

Below Expectations 2

Significantly

Below Expectations 1

Not

Observed 0

Not

Applicable

N/A

Problem

Solving

TLS: 1, 2,

4

InTASC:

5, 8, 9

The teacher

implements activities that

teach and

reinforce four or more of the

following problem-solving

types:

Abstraction

Categorization

Drawing Conclusions/

Justifying Solutions

Predicting

Outcomes

Observing and

Experimenting

Improving

Solutions

Identifying

Relevant/

Irrelevant Information

Generating Ideas

Creating and Designing

The teacher

implements activities that teach

three of the

following problem-solving types:

Abstraction

Categorization

Drawing Conclusions/Jus

tifying Solution

Predicting

Outcomes

Observing and Experimenting

Improving

Solutions

Identifying Relevant/

Irrelevant

Information

Generating

Ideas Creating and

Designing

The teacher implements

activities that teach two of the following

problem-solving types:

Abstraction

Categorization

Drawing

Conclusions/Justifyi

ng Solution

Predicting Outcomes

Observing and Experimenting

Improving Solutions

Identifying Relevant/

Irrelevant Information

Generating Ideas

Creating and

Designing

The teacher implements

no activities that teach one of the following

problem-solving types:

Abstraction

Categorization

Drawing

Conclusions/Justifyin

g Solution

Predicting Outcomes

Observing and Experimenting

Improving Solutions

Identifying Relevant/

Irrelevant Information

Generating Ideas

Creating and

Designing

Appropria

te but not

evident

Not

applicable for this

lesson

Appendix E

Modified TEAM Observation Form

Candidate Name: _______________________ Candidate ID: ________________ Date: ___________

Cooperating Teacher: ______________________ Field Supervisor:

______________________________

School Site: __________________ Grade: __________ Subject: ______________ Time:

Page 38: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

38

______________

4 = Above Expectations; 3 = At Expectations; 2 = Below Expectations; 1 = Significantly Below

Expectations;

0 = No Evidence; N/A = Not Applicable to Lesson

Designing and Planning

Instruction

Observer

Score

Self

Score

Instructional Plans (IP)

Student Work (SW)

Assessment (AS)

Learning Environment Observer

Score

Self

Score

Expectations (EX)

Managing Student

Behavior (MSB)

Environment (ENV)

Respectful Culture (RC)

Instruction Observer

Score

Self

Score

Standards and Objectives

(SO)

Motivating Students (MS)

Presenting Instructional

Content (PIC)

Lesson Structure and

Pacing (LS)

Activities and Materials

(ACT)

Questioning (QU)

Academic Feedback

(FEED)

Grouping Students (GRP)

Teacher Content

Knowledge (TCK)

Teacher Knowledge of

Students (TKS)

Thinking (TH)

Problem Solving (PS)

Reinforcement Objective (Area of Strength):

Indicator: _______________________________

Notes:

Refinement Objective (Area to Strengthen):

Indicator: _______________________________

Notes:

Page 39: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

39

Observer Signature _________________________________ Date ___________________

Candidate Signature _______________________________ Date ___________________

Teacher Reflection on Observation (Optional):

Observer Reflection on Observation (Optional):

Page 40: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

40

Appendix F

Helpful Key Terms

Adjunct faculty Part-time faculty in the professional education unit who are not full-

time employees of the institution

Assessment An evaluated activity or task used by a program or unit to determine the

extent to which specific learning proficiencies, outcomes, or standards

have been mastered by candidates

Candidates Individuals admitted to, or enrolled in, programs for the initial or

advanced preparation of teachers, teachers continuing their professional

development, or other school professionals; candidates are

distinguished from students in P–12 schools

Clinical Practice Student teaching

Constructivist Theory Method of teaching where learners actively engage in the learning

process where they build upon prior knowledge and previous

experience

Cooperating Teacher Mentoring teacher during clinical practice and/or field experience

Field Experiences A variety of early and ongoing field-based opportunities in which

candidates may observe, assist, tutor, instruct, and/or conduct research;

may occur in off-campus settings such as schools, community centers,

or homeless shelters

Field Supervisors Those individuals, employed by LMU, who observe candidates in field

and clinical experiences

InTASC The Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium, a

project of the Council of Chief State School Officers that has developed

model performance-based standards and assessments for the licensure of

teachers

Licensure The official recognition by a state governmental agency that an

individual has met certain qualifications specified by the state and is,

therefore, approved to practice in an occupation as a professional

Philosophy of Education Preparing professional educators of distinction to make a positive impact

on this generation and the next in the areas of education, values, and

service

Professional Development Opportunities for educators to develop new knowledge and skills

through activities such as in-service education, conference attendance,

sabbatical leave, summer leave, intra- and inter-institutional visitations,

fellowships, and work in P–12 schools

Page 41: ENHANCED STUDENT TEACHING COOPERATING TEACHER

41

Professional Dispositions Professional attitudes, values, and beliefs demonstrated through both

verbal and non-verbal behaviors as educators interact with students,

families, colleagues, and communities

Proficiencies University required knowledge and skills

Service Learning A teaching/learning method that integrates community service into

academic courses, using structured reflective thinking to enhance

learning of course content

Students Individuals in P-12 schools; distinguished from candidates in the Initial

Teacher Licensure program

Student Teaching Pre-service clinical practice in P–12 schools for candidates preparing to

teach

Teacher Candidate Individuals admitted to, or enrolled in, programs for the initial teacher

licensure, including student teachers