entergy engineering standard en-ep-s-002-multi …attachment 7.2 pipe/tank coating visual inspection...

8
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3) ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 | 05000286 Exhibit #: Identified: Admitted: Withdrawn: Rejected: Stricken: Other: ENT000612-00-BD01 8/20/2013 8/20/2013 ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI I REV. 1 Underground Piping and Tanks PAGE 14 OF 15 General Visual Inspection ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 2 NOTE: A photographic record of each indication should be retained with the inspection report. Line/Tank ID & Name: 8-in Fire Protection Line Work Order: 279577-02 System: Fire Protection Inspection Date: 5/14/2013 Location: IP3 NW WHUT PIT Inspector: J .Peterson/S.Guarnaccia Coating Material: KOQQers Bitumastic with taQe wraQ Thickness: Original-As found ------ [ ] Not Coated ot.'" COMAf/,s,s/O F )); ' Backfill Makeup: \, } Contains Rocks? Yes [] No [X] Description: N/A ?", .$JJ. ... .1.S Contains Other Foreign Objects? Yes [ ] No [X] Description: N/A Note 1. Any Mechanical Damage? Yes [ ] No [X] 2. Any Holiday/Hole? Yes [ ] No [X] 3. Any Blistering? Yes [ ] No [X] 4. Any Peeling? Yes [X] No [ ] Exterior taQe wraQ 5. Any Flaking? Yes [ ] No [X] 6. Any Delamination? Yes [ ] No [X] 7. Any Embrittlement? Yes [ ] No [X] 8. Any Embedded Rocks (Coating and/or Base)? Yes [ ] No [X] 9. Any Cracking? Yes [ ] No [X] 10. Any Gouges? Yes [ ] No [ ] 11. Any Rusting? Yes [ ] No [X] 12. Other? Yes [ ] No [X] Any Yes answer requires a CR to be initiated General Appearance: A Qortion of the 8-inch Fire Protection line was excavated and visually insQected. The total length of the Fire Protection line insQected was at least 12 ft. The inspected length of QiQing had no visible signs of coating degradation. There were some minor imQerfections in the exterior taQe wraQ of the QiQe. It was noted that where the exterior taQe was removed and the coating was eXQosed the general aQQearance of the coating was observed to be intact, with no voids in the coating, or blistering, Qeeling, flaking, seQaration. etc. Degradation Found? Yes [X] No [ ] Further Evaluation Required? Yes [] No [X]

Upload: others

Post on 23-Mar-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI …ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 Comments: Coated piping was wrapped with exterior tape (protective

����������� �����������������

Uni

ted

Stat

es N

ucle

ar R

egul

ator

y C

omm

issi

on O

ffici

al H

earin

g Ex

hibi

t

In th

e M

atte

r of:

Ent

ergy

Nuc

lear

Ope

ratio

ns, I

nc.

(Indi

an P

oint

Nuc

lear

Gen

erat

ing

Uni

ts 2

and

3)

ASL

BP

#:07

-858

-03-

LR-B

D01

D

ocke

t #:0

5000

247

| 050

0028

6 Ex

hibi

t #:

Iden

tifie

d:

Adm

itted

: W

ithdr

awn:

R

ejec

ted:

St

ricke

n:

Oth

er: E

NT0

0061

2-00

-BD

018/

20/2

013

8/20

/201

3

ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI I REV. 1

Underground Piping and Tanks PAGE 14 OF 15 General Visual Inspection

ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Sheet 1 of 2

NOTE: A photographic record of each indication should be retained with the inspection report.

Line/Tank ID & Name: 8-in Fire Protection Line Work Order: 279577-02

System: Fire Protection Inspection Date: 5/14/2013

Location: IP3 NW WHUT PIT Inspector: J .Peterson/S.Guarnaccia

Coating Material: KOQQers Bitumastic with taQe wraQ Thickness: Original-As found ------ [ ] Not Coated

ot.'" COMAf/,s,s/O F));' Backfill Makeup:

\, } Contains Rocks? Yes [] No [X] Description: N/A ?", .$JJ. ... .1.S o~,;"'~

Contains Other Foreign Objects? Yes [ ] No [X] Description: N/A

Note

1. Any Mechanical Damage? Yes [ ] No [X]

2. Any Holiday/Hole? Yes [ ] No [X]

3. Any Blistering? Yes [ ] No [X]

4. Any Peeling? Yes [X] No [ ] Exterior taQe wraQ

5. Any Flaking? Yes [ ] No [X]

6. Any Delamination? Yes [ ] No [X]

7. Any Embrittlement? Yes [ ] No [X]

8. Any Embedded Rocks (Coating and/or Base)? Yes [ ] No [X]

9. Any Cracking? Yes [ ] No [X]

10. Any Gouges? Yes [ ] No [ ]

11. Any Rusting? Yes [ ] No [X]

12. Other? Yes [ ] No [X]

Any Yes answer requires a CR to be initiated

General Appearance: A Qortion of the 8-inch Fire Protection line was excavated and visually insQected. The

total length of the Fire Protection line insQected was at least 12 ft. The inspected length of QiQing had no

visible signs of coating degradation. There were some minor imQerfections in the exterior taQe wraQ of the

QiQe. It was noted that where the exterior taQe was removed and the coating was eXQosed the general

aQQearance of the coating was observed to be intact, with no voids in the coating, or blistering, Qeeling,

flaking, seQaration. etc.

Degradation Found? Yes [X] No [ ] Further Evaluation Required? Yes [] No [X]

Page 2: ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI …ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 Comments: Coated piping was wrapped with exterior tape (protective

ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MUL TJ I REV. 1

Underground Piping and Tanks PAGE 14 OF 15 General Visual Inspection

ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2

Comments: Coated piping was wrapped with exterior tape (protective tape). Minor imperfections observed

in the exterior tape wrap that did not penetrate down to the coating surface. Damaged could have occurred

during excavation. Recommend wrap repair (overlap with new tape). Photos and sketch attached, Ref:

Drawing 9321-F-41823.

CR Required? Yes [X] No [ ] CR No. _~C~R'-.!.-I!....P3~-~2~01~3~-0~3~0~4~0 ____ _

Program Owner or Qualified Designee: Una Cossio-Gonzale

Date: 06/07/2013

Date: 06/07/2013

fuCuss~ b. Date: 06/07/2013

Page 3: ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI …ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 Comments: Coated piping was wrapped with exterior tape (protective

EXC1-3/1P3 @ NW Corner of the WHUT Pit

Piping Uncovered for inspection: 1.5-inch Admin Air Line 2-inch Potable Water (cold) Line 2-inch Demineralized Water Line 8-inch Fire Protection Line 6-inch Fire Protection Line

Excavation EXC1-3

WA~Tt. \o4OLO·~ TANI( PIT

Reference: drawing 9321-F-41823

Page 4: ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI …ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 Comments: Coated piping was wrapped with exterior tape (protective

IP3 Aerial view

Page 5: ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI …ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 Comments: Coated piping was wrapped with exterior tape (protective

'i-""" Potable W""" (cold) Lilli

Page 6: ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI …ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 Comments: Coated piping was wrapped with exterior tape (protective
Page 7: ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI …ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 Comments: Coated piping was wrapped with exterior tape (protective
Page 8: ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI …ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 Comments: Coated piping was wrapped with exterior tape (protective

Entergy CONDITION REPORT I CR-IP3-2013-03040

Originator: Cossio-Gonzalez,Lina

Originator Site Group: IP3 P&C Eng Codes StaffIP3

Originator Phone: 2547148

Operability Required: Y

Reportability Required: Y Supervisor Name: Azevedo,Nelson F

Discovered Date: 06/05/2013 12:47

Condition Description:

Initiated Date: 06/05/2013 12:55

Visual Inspections of the 2-inch Potable Water (cold), 2-inch Demineralized Water, 8-inch Fire Protection, 6-inch Fire Protection and 16-inch outer pipe containing 6-in SRM Line 561 and 2-in COND Line 678 piping exposed by the IP3, NW Comer of the WHUT Pit excavation revealed several exterior tape wrap anomalies. There is no operability concern associated with any of these anomalies since both the coating under the tape and the pipe were not affected by these tape anomalies.

Immediate Action Description: Discussed with Engineering Management.

Suggested Action Description: Recommend that these anomalies be evaluated and repaired as required prior to backfill of the excavation.