EnterprisePeg David

AIM Technical Program ManagerNETPDTC N621

23 APRIL 2013

2

Overview

• Enterprise AIM I/AIM II & CPM eDMZ Transition • Authority to Operate (ATO) • SSC NOLA Enterprise Data Center Migration• SSC NOLA Citrix – Risk• Issues • Non-NETC Sites/Commands • AIM Content Repository Requirements• Configuration Control Board (CCB)

3

AIM Central Site Hosting at NETPDTC

• NETC N74/N6, NETPDTC & NAWCTSD Migration Plan 18 FEB – 24 APR - Completed eDMZ Migration

All NETC Learning Centers and SSP Content, databases, processing, Citrix NTSS Accounts

Benefits Simultaneous access by geographically dispersed Center and

contractor personnel for collaborative development and maintenance

Positions AIM Enterprise for SPAWAR New Orleans (NOLA) Enterprise Data Center Transition (NEDC)

Lessons Learned RADM Quinn – BZ!

4

Government CPM Hosting

• CPM in Aimereon/vendor site – Sunset 12 APR• CPM in NETPDTC eDMZ deployed – 15 APR• https://cpm.prod.aim.netc.navy.mil • Benefits

Enterprise production hosting and support vs current contractor environment with limited server configuration and bandwidth

Leverages NETC domain Sys Admin, Database Management, and Information Assurance expertise at NETPDTC and SSC NOLA

Co-located with rest of NETC enterprise IT applications; secure access from both .mil and .com domains

5

AIM ATO Status

• 3-year ATO granted by FLTCYBERCOM 26 Dec 12• Allowed us to proceed with migration of AIM I/II

Central Site instances into NMCI eDMZ and hosting CPM in eDMZ vs vendor site

• ATO POAM CAT III – deployment of CAC for Application Jun/July timeframe (T)

• Certification & Accreditation (C&A) artifacts are routinely kept updated; used for annual FISMA reviews, etc, living documents

• Migration to SPAWAR NOLA requires modified ATO to support NEDC environment

6

AIM Central Site Migration to NOLA NEDC

• Goal: Hardware/system software infrastructure in place SSC NOLA by 30 SEP 13

• Schedule for operational transition/deployment from current NETPDTC eDMZ host to NOLA host TBD Lessons Learned - Transition plan similar to recent eDMZ

migration – Application Functional Testing (AFT); Production cutover

• Management of AIM I/II/LO Module Central Sites and CPM will remain with NETPDTC; only physical hosting moves to NOLA

• NEDC Remote Access: GFE or CFE required for SPAWAR CITRIX access – discussions in progress

7

Risk ManagementNEDC Remote Access

1 2 3 4 5

Impact

Pro

bab

ilit

y 1

0

30

50

70

90

1

Low Medium High

Description: (1) For Off-site Users - GFE or CFE is required for SPAWAR CITRIX access-- Govt Furnished Equipment (GFE) = property acquired

directly by Govt and made available to contractor; and, -- Corporate Furnished Equipment (CFE) = equipment

purchased by DoD/Govt contracted company specifically in support of DoD/Govt contract; used only by personnel supporting that contract

Mitigation Plan: -- NETPDTC team provided current AIM Citrix STIG

mitigations; architecture to NOLA team-- SPAWAR NOLA team discussed separate AIM APP Citrix

instance vs shared Citrix Farm -- Technical options for AIM Users – discussions forthcoming

AIM Engineering Mtgs Apr; arrive at consensus

8

Issue:Privilege Levels

• 5 levels implemented in Central Site AIM II per CNATT request

• 3 levels implemented in Central Site AIM I per SSP request

• CPM-style role/privilege structure tasked and funded by NETC N74/NAWCTSD

9

Issue:Hosting Test Environment

• NMCI AIM users needed to test ongoing system enhancements as part of formal Govt Acceptance Testing (GAT) process

• Cannot install in-process AIM updates on local NMCI PCs or access contractor-hosted virtual server to conduct tests

• NETPDTC to establish Test Environment to support ongoing requirement

10

Issue:Blocking Word Macros

• NMCI does not allow MSWord macros to be enabled on NMCI desktop PCs once Win 7/Office 2010 is installed

• This poses crippling limitation on TG functionality for stand-alone desktop installations of AIM under NMCI; no work-around has yet been identified

• Does not affect AIM Central site instances inside eDMZ

11

Issue:Software Release Process

• All Central Site instances now migrated to Rel 5.0• CNATT requirement to maintain local NMCI AIM II

instances to support effective community-wide business process

• Discussion re NMCI certification process / schedule• Impact of NMCI certification delay / push of Rel 5.0

12

Issue: NOFORN NNPI

• Affects primarily non-SWS undersea community – NAVSEA 07TR, SLC & SLC learning sites

• Stringent data handling controls re unclassified No Foreign Dissemination Navy Nuclear Power Information (NNPI), mandated by NAVSEA 08

• NETC/NETPDTC stood up TRANET-C NNPI COI to host: SLC reference materials, e-library, IETMs, course

curriculum info, AIM content, used by SLC/DETs TRANET-C NNPI COI use/rqmts by other LCs TBD POC: Bruce Bare, NETC

13

Non-NETC Commands Implementation

• Non-NETC Commands interest in AIM Enterprise

• Prioritizing in Process NSTC (OTC/RTC) – in process Navy MedicineNAVSPECWARCEN (hosted by NAVSOC)NAVRESDANTESRegional Maintenance Centers – Norfolk / San DiegoNaval Shipyards - hosted Norfolk

14

AIM Content Repository

• Enterprise Requirements’ for Ancillary Data Storage Area• AIM Enterprise has multiple components: AIM I, AIM

II, CPM, LO and ancillary file shares• Requires configuration management; search; access by

enterprise users• Notional Plan

• Complete Functional Requirements Document • H2 assisting – collate input/requirements provided

from LCs• FY14 goal/priority

15

Configuration Control Board (CCB)

• NETC Instruction 5200.3 – established authoritative framework for effective & innovative configuration compliance for IM/IT as it relates to NETC WD Line of Business -- Each T&E App has Charter; Chairpersons: PM and TPMs

• Purpose of CCB: ensure programmatic changes (i.e., consideration of proposed cost and schedule changes) and related technical changes to information systems are processed in a visible and traceable manner

• AIM CCB membership – commands/vendors (as applicable): NETC N74 Program Manager (PM) – Michael Mosley NETC N741A Deputy Program Manager (DPM) – Leslie Desenburg NETPDTC N621 Technical Program Manager (TPM) – Peg David NETPDTC Information Assurance (IAM/IAO) – Kelley Harris or designated IAO NETPDTC System Development Team – Christopher Stark; when applicable NAWCTSD Application Technical Program Manager (TPM) – Tiffany Dombrowski NAWCTSD System Dev/Trng Team – Mike Matzko / Mike Coyle AIMEREON Application Team – Jim Ferrall and AIMEREON staff as identified; when applicable NETC Learning Centers – Representatives as identified via the AIM FRB; when applicable SSP and other Navy Commands Using Enterprise AIM – Representatives as identified via the AIM

FRB – when applicable

16

CCB (cont)

• CCB Forum Participants get together discuss (specified work/projects) which need

to be completed Responsible agents are assigned for performing agreed-upon work Decisions/assigned actions are recorded when completed Includes: providing tech support during development of decision support

documentation such as: Requests for Information Services (RIS), System Functionality Assessments (SFA), Analysis of Alternatives (AOA), Independent Cost Estimates (ICE), and Software Change Requests (SCR), etc.

• CCB shall review, adjudicate, elevate, or place on hold proposed changes for adjudication as required

• CCB shall reach a decision after a period of presentation and discussion, at which time the Chairperson may poll members for their position or recommendation

• CCB Chairperson(s) shall make all final decisions• Held ICW AIM FRB Meetings; or on more frequent basis; when applicable

17

AIM Central Site Implementation

• Points of contact: NETC N74: Mike Mosley, Leslie Desenburg NETPDTC: Peg David, Christopher Stark NAWCTSD: Tiffany Dombrowski, Mike Matzko AIMEREON: Jim Ferrall, Steve Wicinski, Mike Coyle

• NETPDTC Enterprise/Central Site specifics, narrated help videos, lessons learned - available on AIM information Web page:

http://aim.aimereon.com/aim/AIM-Central-Site-Hosting-at-NETPDTC.ashx

18

Questions?

Enterprise Training Management FrameworkContinuous Process Improvement

ETMF Status Update

Bruce Bare, NETC N62

Jon Sullivan, H2 Performance Consulting, Corp

23 April 2013

20

Topics

ETMF Phase II Goals & Deliverables Roadmap Results to Date Current Roadmapping Activities Roadmap Development Schedule

21

ETMF – Phase IIGoals Document and analyze “As-Is” state of core business processes required to

develop, manage and deliver training curricula

Identify duplication, inefficiencies, process improvement opportunities

Determine most efficient alignment of core training management systems Recommend strategies that will support NETC’s ability to continue quality &

quantity of education while controlling (reducing) costs

Deliverables

1. Inventory Management Process Recommendation – Delivered Mar 2013

2. Assessments Tool Recommendation – Planned Jun 2013 Delivery

3. NETC Enterprise Technology Roadmap – Planned Sep 2013 Delivery

22

Roadmap Results To-Date

CPPD25%

NETC N728%

NETC N7313%

NETC N7411%

NETPDTC N6124%

CNATT17%

CID22%

Responses by Group

Business / Service Workshops: COMPLETEDTechnology Workshops: COMPLETED

Participating Teams NETC N72, N73, N74 CPPD CNATT CID LAS Team NETPDTC N612 NETPDTC N621 *Data not represented

Sample Data Pool 53 Participants 328 Responses

CPPD17%

NETC N729%

NETC N7313%

NETC N7413%

NETPDTC N612

8%

CNATT15%

CID25%

Participants by Group

23

Roadmap Responses to Date

Num

ber

of

Res

pons

es

Gap Areas by Category

24

Current Roadmapping Activities

Data Gathering Remaining Technical Workshop Input

Data Validation Workshop & Focus Group Data Analysis Findings Validation Survey Analysis Gap Analysis

Results Documentation Roadmap Initiative Groupings Roadmap Initiative Worksheets

Charting Workshop Planning Customizing Roadmap Templates Identifying Industry Trends

25

Roadmap Development Schedule

Wor

ksho

ps

1 &

2

Feb March April May June July August September

Wor

ksho

p 3

Tech

nolo

gy

Wor

ksho

p 4

Char

ting

Cons

trai

nt R

evie

w

Documentation & Validation

Documentation, Validation &

Analysis

Dra

ft R

evie

w

Fina

l Del

iver

able

Validation & Draft Prep

Documentation & Validation

Charting

Progress as of 23 April 2013

26

Questions?