entrepreneurial discoveries in norway, what's new? · entrepreneurial discoveries in norway,...
TRANSCRIPT
Entrepreneurial discoveries in Norway, what's new?
Innovation research in Norway – recent findings and future perspectivesSession 2: Actors in innovation
Research Council of Norway, Oslo, 2017-03-03
Åge Mariussen, NordlandsforskningHåkon Finne, SINTEF
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (1)
• We need to understand the role of leadership in regional development games (Sotarauta, 2009)
• There is a need for policies that combine actor-based and system-based tools in newpath development (Isaksen & Jakobsen, 2017)
• Individuals who bridge industry and universities or span global space play a significant role in innovation (Lam, 2014)
• Innovation processes always depend on complex human interaction (Aasen, in process)
• Still, institutional resilience and macro-economic forces cannot be easily dismissed
The actor-system tensions in regional innovation policy
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (2)
• Porter's “sustainable competitiveness” strategies are unable to combine exploration and exploitation in a sufficiently dynamic way (for achieving transientcompetiveness), and accordingly not able to adjust to rapidly changing global markets (McGrath, 2013) => cluster initiatives are no panacea
• The RIS approach is too oriented towards path maintenance and renewal, and not able to provide relevant policy advice (for new path creation) (Doloreux & Gomez, 2017)
• RIS literature “is nearly silent on the conditions that enable growth to accrue in regions where innovation occurs“ (Doloreux & Gomez, 2017); assumes Schumpeter's tenet that innovation drives economic development, that MAR agglomeration advantages prevail in industrial districts, and that Jacobs externalities require cities
Shortcomings of cluster and innovation system policies
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (3)
• Smart specializationLevel of an economy (local, regional, national): Industrial specialization thatdisplays a comparative advantage
• Smart specialization strategy (S3)Co-development of industries and their bases in R&D and other resources
• Entrepreneurial discovery process (EDP)Micro level: Entrepreneurs' search for, and development of, new potential business areas (Kirzner, 1997; March, 1991 on exploration vs exploitation)Level of an economy (local, regional, national): EDPs that develop or renew smart specializations; 'self-discovery' (Hausmann & Rodrik, 2003), where individualentrepreneurs can be critical resources
• Strategies for EDPGiving organization and impetus to collective EDPs at the level of an economy, jointly governed between triple/quadruple helix actors
Smart specialization and entrepreneurial discovery processes
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (4)
S3 subsumes systems approaches and (re)introduces actor-reliant policy tools
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (5)
smart specialization
(EDP)
innovation system
cluster
• domains• specialized areas of
complementary skills
• regional innovationplatforms
• value chains, suppliers
• related institutions
exploration
exploitation
Based on Rinkinen & Harmaakorpi, 2017 (forthcoming); Foray, 2015
• Smart specialization is place based; related variety paradigm (Frenken et al. 2007) subsumes both Jacobs and MAR externalities and gives understanding of knowledgein economic development a proper foundation
• Policy for EDP is based on economic research on spontaneously emergent processes, also in resource based economies like that of Norway
• S3 provides a new rationale for innovation policy interventions which can helprebalance the Norwegian system of innovation in the direction of more exploration
S3/EDP is good news for Norway
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (6)
• Salmon farming (Aasen & Ullern, in process)• Experience economy and destination development in tourism (Løvland & Mariussen,
in process)
• Failures• Unused opportunities
Some examples of pre-S3 EDPs in Norway
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (7)
S3/EDP requires new roles for public sector
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (8)
smart specialization
(EDP)
innovation system
cluster
• leader of strategy process, shared governance, higherrisk exposure
•balancing exploitation / exploration
• system failure arguments ->•R&D subventions• "innovation infrastructure"
•market failure arguments ->•education• cluster initiatives
exploration
exploitation
Based on Rinkinen & Harmaakorpi, 2017 (forthcoming)
Challenges (1): tools for enhancing connectivity
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (9)
Virkkala et al., 2017
Challenges (2): Tools for reorienting towards exploration
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (10)
Increaseinnovation / discoveries
Connecting actors and systems (micro and macro)
Smart Specialisation & EPD (Foray, 2015)
Triple Helix:• Authorities• Firms• Univ./Research(Virkkala et al., 2017)
1. Tensions between conflictingyet complementary activities:
- Exploration- Exploitation
2. Firms and governments (microand macro) are black-boxes to each other
it is challenging to engage in strategiccoordination
EconomicRestructing
towardsSustainabilityDevelopment
• Where is the policy balancing point between path extension, path renewal, newpath creation?
Signs of lock-in and promising new paths• Where can entrepreneurial discoveries take place?
Identifying promising domains (and tools for mapping related variety, productspace and complexity, value chain climbing)Peripheral regions in transnational knowledge networks
• How can discovery processes be organized?Ambidexterity in firms and at policy level; metamorphosis of industryCo-design and governance of mutual support mechanisms by policy-makers and entrepreneurs (Nguyen, 2017)
New research paths
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (11)
• Doloreux, David and Igone Porto Gomez (2017): “A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research.” European Planning Studies Vol. 25No. 3, pp. 371-387.
• Foray, Dominique (2015): Smart specialisation. Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London: Routledge.• Frenken, Koen, Frank Van Oort and Thijs Verburg (2007): “Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth.” Regional Studies Vol. 41 No. 5,
pp. 685-697.• Hausmann, Ricardo and Dani Rodrik (2003): “Economic development as self-discovery.” Journal of Development Economics Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 603-633.• Isaksen, Arne and Stig-Erik Jakobsen (2017): “New path development between innovation systems and individual actors.” European Planning Studies Vol. 25
No. 3, pp. 355-370.• Kirzner, Israel M (1997): “Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach.” Journal of Economic Literature Vol. 35 No. 1,
pp. 60-85.• Lam, Alice (2014): “Tacit knowledge, embedded agency and learning: local nodes and global networks.” Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation Vol. 32 No.
1, pp. 93-99.• Løvland, Jarle and Åge Mariussen (in process): "The co-emergence of the Lofoten Islands as an experience tourism destination and applied research on
experience tourism destination development".• March, James G (1991): “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.” Organization Science Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 71-87.• McGrath, Rita Gunther (2013): The end of competitive advantage : how to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. Boston: Harvard Business Review
Press.• Nguyen, Nhien (2017): "The role of metamorphosis in smart specialisation strategy & entrepreneurial discovery process". Innovation reserach in Norway, Oslo
2017-03-03.• Rinkinen, Satu and Vesa Harmaakorpi (2017 (in progress)): “The business ecosystem concept in innovation policy context: Building a theoretical framework.”
Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research.• Sotarauta, Markku (2009): “Nordic view on leadership in regional development games.” Regions Magazine Vol. 275 No. 1, pp. 11-13.• Virkkala, Seija, Antti Mäenpää and Åge Mariussen (2017): “A connectivity model as a potential tool for smart specialization strategies.” European Planning
Studies Vol. (forthcoming).• Aasen, Tone Merethe Berg (in process): " Approaching knowledge conversion in entrepreneurial discovery processes from a complex process theory
perspective".• Aasen, Tone Merethe Berg and Eli Fyhn Ullern (in process): "Science/practice knowledge interaction in the fish farming industry of Mid-Norway".
Thank you for your attention
Innovation research in Norway (Lysaker 2017-03-03) (12)