env 593: session ii october 14, 2004
DESCRIPTION
ENV 593: Session II October 14, 2004. Genomics and Public Health Policy. Genomic Information. Genetic variability and Susceptible populations. Ecogenetics. DNA. Pharmacogenomics. Gene expression patterns in response to drugs and toxins. RNA. Toxicogenomics. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ENV 593:ENV 593:Session IISession II
October 14, 2004October 14, 2004
Genomics and Public Genomics and Public
Health PolicyHealth Policy
Genomic InformationGenomic Information
DNADNA
RNARNA
proteinsproteins
metabolitesmetabolites
ProteomicsProteomics
ToxicogenomicsToxicogenomics
PharmacogenomicsPharmacogenomics
MetabolomicsMetabolomics
EcogeneticsEcogenetics Genetic variability and Genetic variability and Susceptible populationsSusceptible populations
Gene expression patterns Gene expression patterns in response to drugs in response to drugs
and toxinsand toxins
Protein expression profilesProtein expression profilesin response to toxins/drugsin response to toxins/drugs
Metabolite expression Metabolite expression patterns in response to patterns in response to
toxins/drugstoxins/drugs
Major Chemical Laws in Major Chemical Laws in USUS
EPAEPA Air pollutantsAir pollutants Clean Air Act, 1970Clean Air Act, 1970
Water pollutantsWater pollutants Federal Water Pollution Control Act Federal Water Pollution Control Act 19721972
Drinking waterDrinking water Safe Drinking Water Act Safe Drinking Water Act 19721972
PesticidesPesticides Fungicide, Insecticides and Fungicide, Insecticides and Rodenticides Rodenticides Act (FIFRA), 1972; Food Act (FIFRA), 1972; Food Quality Protection Quality Protection Act (FGPA) 1996Act (FGPA) 1996
Toxic ChemicalsToxic Chemicals Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) 19761976
Hazardous WasteHazardous Waste Resource conservation and Resource conservation and Recovery Act Recovery Act (RCRA) 1976(RCRA) 1976
OSHAOSHA WorkplaceWorkplace Occupational Safety and Health Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act (OSH) Act 19701970
FDAFDA Foods, Drugs and CosmeticsFoods, Drugs and CosmeticsFDC Acts 1906, 1938, 1962, 1977FDC Acts 1906, 1938, 1962, 1977FDA modernization Act 1997FDA modernization Act 1997
GenomicsGenomics
How are the regulatory How are the regulatory agencies addressing agencies addressing
and incorporating into and incorporating into practices and policies practices and policies
the information the information generated by genomic generated by genomic
methods?methods?
Genomics and Genomics and Public Health Policy Public Health Policy
FDA-U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationFDA-U.S. Food and Drug Administration Drug and food safetyDrug and food safety Changes in FDA approval consideration to Changes in FDA approval consideration to
address address pharmacogenomicpharmacogenomic data? data? EPA-Environmental Protection AgencyEPA-Environmental Protection Agency
Protect human health and the environment Protect human health and the environment Develop and enforce regulationsDevelop and enforce regulations Exposure standardsExposure standards Alterations in regulations or standards due to Alterations in regulations or standards due to
toxicogenomictoxicogenomic data? data?
Genomics and the FDAGenomics and the FDA
““Pharmacogenomics is a new field but we Pharmacogenomics is a new field but we intend to do all we can to use it to promote intend to do all we can to use it to promote
the development of medicine….it holds the development of medicine….it holds great promise to shed scientific light on the great promise to shed scientific light on the
often risky and costly process of drug often risky and costly process of drug development, and to provide greater development, and to provide greater
confidence about the risks and benefits of confidence about the risks and benefits of drugs.” drugs.”
FDA Commissioner Mark B McClellan, FDA Commissioner Mark B McClellan,
when releasing the new when releasing the new
pharmacogenomic draft guidelines for the FDA.pharmacogenomic draft guidelines for the FDA.
FDA and Genomics:FDA and Genomics:Pharmacogenomic DataPharmacogenomic Data
Recognizes the potential ability to identify Recognizes the potential ability to identify sources of inter-individual variability in sources of inter-individual variability in drug response (both efficacy and toxicity)drug response (both efficacy and toxicity)
Considers the field in the early Considers the field in the early developmental stagedevelopmental stage
Genomic data in isolation, not enough to Genomic data in isolation, not enough to determine regulationsdetermine regulations
Use of genomics must demonstrate a well-Use of genomics must demonstrate a well-accepted mechanistic and clinical accepted mechanistic and clinical significancesignificance
Genomics and the EPA:Genomics and the EPA:Interim PolicyInterim Policy
Encourages and supports continued Encourages and supports continued genomic research.genomic research.
Limited use of genomics while the Agency Limited use of genomics while the Agency gains experience in assessing quality, gains experience in assessing quality, accuracy and reproducibility and accuracy and reproducibility and relevance of the data.relevance of the data.
Genomics data alone are currently Genomics data alone are currently insufficient as a basis for risk assessment insufficient as a basis for risk assessment and management decisions. and management decisions.
May be used in a “weight-of-evidence” May be used in a “weight-of-evidence” approach.approach.
Use of Genomics Within Use of Genomics Within the FDA and EPAthe FDA and EPA
Identification of susceptible populations Identification of susceptible populations Development of disease; drug and toxic Development of disease; drug and toxic
responseresponse Development of biomarkersDevelopment of biomarkers
Disease and drug safety; toxic exposure/effectDisease and drug safety; toxic exposure/effect Mode of action informationMode of action information
Gene expression profiles/fingerprintingGene expression profiles/fingerprinting Drug therapy; toxic exposure and responseDrug therapy; toxic exposure and response
Use of Genomics Within Use of Genomics Within the FDA and EPAthe FDA and EPA
Identification of susceptible populations Identification of susceptible populations Development of disease; drug and toxic Development of disease; drug and toxic
responseresponse Development of biomarkersDevelopment of biomarkers
Disease and drug safety; toxic exposure/effectDisease and drug safety; toxic exposure/effect Mode of action informationMode of action information
Gene expression profiles/fingerprintingGene expression profiles/fingerprinting Drug therapy; toxic exposure and responseDrug therapy; toxic exposure and response
Susceptible PopulationsSusceptible Populations Arises from human genetic variabilityArises from human genetic variability Human Genome Project Human Genome Project
found variations at approx. 1/1000 base pairsfound variations at approx. 1/1000 base pairs >1 million genetic differences between any two >1 million genetic differences between any two
individualsindividuals Genetic PolymorphismsGenetic Polymorphisms
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A variant in the sequence of DNA found in >1% of the A variant in the sequence of DNA found in >1% of the
populationpopulation >3 million candidate SNPs identified to date>3 million candidate SNPs identified to date estimated that there are ~11 million SNPsestimated that there are ~11 million SNPs Prevalence is often found to differ between ethnic Prevalence is often found to differ between ethnic
groupsgroups
Genotypes to PhenotypesGenotypes to Phenotypes
Gene variant
Subtle change in protein function
Change in biological response
Human VariabilityHuman Variability
adapted from Eaton, 2004
Genetics is one factor contributing to overall variability between individuals
Nu
mb
er o
f In
div
idu
als
General Population
Sensitive Subpopulation
Adverse Response
* Genetics, Age, Health Status, Exposure History
*
Variability & Drug Variability & Drug DevelopmentDevelopment
Genotype specific DrugsGenotype specific Drugs FDA has approved several drugs designed for FDA has approved several drugs designed for
individuals with a specific genotype or protein individuals with a specific genotype or protein expression level.expression level.
GleevecGleevecTMTM
‘‘targeted’ drug treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia targeted’ drug treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) .(CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) .
Most of these patients express a Bcr–Abl fusion protein Most of these patients express a Bcr–Abl fusion protein tyrosine kinase that is the basis of disease development and tyrosine kinase that is the basis of disease development and progression. progression.
GleevecGleevecTMTM targets this mutation and acts to block targets this mutation and acts to block progression.progression.
Drug development is due to advancement of the Drug development is due to advancement of the understanding of signaling and regulatory pathways of understanding of signaling and regulatory pathways of cancer through genomics.cancer through genomics.
-MacGregor, J; Tox Sci 2003-MacGregor, J; Tox Sci 2003
Variability & Toxic Variability & Toxic Response:Response:
GST and Tobacco SmokeGST and Tobacco Smoke Glutathione S-transferase (GST) Glutathione S-transferase (GST)
Metabolic enzymeMetabolic enzyme Participates in metabolic detoxification of Participates in metabolic detoxification of
benzo(a)pyrenebenzo(a)pyrene GST null donors are more sensitive to the GST null donors are more sensitive to the
induction of chromosomal aberrations due to induction of chromosomal aberrations due to tobacco smoketobacco smoke
GST null also has been linked to increased risk GST null also has been linked to increased risk of lung and bladder cancer in smokers.of lung and bladder cancer in smokers.
Knowledge of genotype may impact behavior.Knowledge of genotype may impact behavior. Biomarker of susceptibilityBiomarker of susceptibility
-Norppa, H. ; Mut Res, 2003-Norppa, H. ; Mut Res, 2003
Use of Genomics Within Use of Genomics Within the FDA and EPAthe FDA and EPA
Identification of susceptible populations Identification of susceptible populations Development of disease; drug and toxic responseDevelopment of disease; drug and toxic response
Development of biomarkersDevelopment of biomarkers Disease and drug safety; toxic exposure/effectDisease and drug safety; toxic exposure/effect
Mode of action informationMode of action information Gene expression profiles/fingerprintingGene expression profiles/fingerprinting Drug therapy; toxic exposure and responseDrug therapy; toxic exposure and response
BiomarkerBiomarker
“…“….a xenobiotically-induced variation .a xenobiotically-induced variation in cellular or biochemical in cellular or biochemical components or processes, components or processes, structures, or functions that is structures, or functions that is measurable in a biological system.”measurable in a biological system.”
--National Academy of National Academy of ScienceScience
The Exposure/Disease The Exposure/Disease PathwayPathway
Exposure Internal Dose
Biological Effective Dose
Early Biological
Effects
Clinical Disease
Altered Structure/Function
Exposure Biomarkers
Susceptibility Biomarkers
Effect Biomarkers
Source: Committee of Biological Markers, NRC 1987
FDA Pharmacogenomic FDA Pharmacogenomic Draft GuidelinesDraft Guidelines
Valid Biomarker if:Valid Biomarker if: It is measured in an analytical test with It is measured in an analytical test with
well established performance well established performance characteristics.characteristics.
An established scientific framework or An established scientific framework or body of evidence that elucidates the body of evidence that elucidates the physiologic, pharmacologic, toxicologic, physiologic, pharmacologic, toxicologic, or clinical significance of the test or clinical significance of the test results.results.
Example of valid biomarker: CYP450 Example of valid biomarker: CYP450
Cytochrome p450Cytochrome p450 Metabolizing enzymeMetabolizing enzyme Highly polymorphic-over 70 different alleles Highly polymorphic-over 70 different alleles
identifiedidentified Different alleles have different metabolizing Different alleles have different metabolizing
capabilitiescapabilities Impacts drug metabolism leading to differences in Impacts drug metabolism leading to differences in
effective dose, side effects and drug interactionseffective dose, side effects and drug interactions P450 2D6 P450 2D6
Activity is reduced in 7-10% of the Caucasian Activity is reduced in 7-10% of the Caucasian population, resulting in higher plasma concentration of population, resulting in higher plasma concentration of p450 2D6 metabolized drugs (e.g. some classes of p450 2D6 metabolized drugs (e.g. some classes of antidepressants)antidepressants)
Genomic screening can identify biomarker for Genomic screening can identify biomarker for individualized drug therapy.individualized drug therapy.
Use of Genomics Within Use of Genomics Within the FDA and EPAthe FDA and EPA
Identification of susceptible populations Identification of susceptible populations Development of disease; drug and toxic Development of disease; drug and toxic
responseresponse Development of biomarkersDevelopment of biomarkers
Disease and drug safety; toxic exposure/effectDisease and drug safety; toxic exposure/effect Mode of action informationMode of action information
Gene expression profiles/fingerprintingGene expression profiles/fingerprinting Drug therapy; toxic exposure and responseDrug therapy; toxic exposure and response
Mode of ActionMode of Action
The series of key events The series of key events that occurs during the that occurs during the
development of an development of an adverse toxicological adverse toxicological response, following response, following
exposure to a toxicant, exposure to a toxicant, which provides a which provides a
biologically plausible biologically plausible explanation of causality explanation of causality
for that toxic effect.for that toxic effect.
- - IPCS, 1999; NRC, IPCS, 1999; NRC, 20002000
ObservedObservedToxicityToxicity
Characteristic profileCharacteristic profileof gene of gene
expression/protein/expression/protein/metabolitemetabolite
Characterization and Characterization and elucidation of elucidation of mechanismmechanism
Gene Expression and Gene Expression and Mode of ActionMode of Action
Toxins/drugs can impact expression of Toxins/drugs can impact expression of genesgenes Alterations to normal function of cellular Alterations to normal function of cellular
pathways leads to toxicitypathways leads to toxicity ““fingerprints” of expression reflect fingerprints” of expression reflect
commonalities within mode of action: commonalities within mode of action: Classification through clustering (NIEHS Classification through clustering (NIEHS
‘toxchip’)‘toxchip’) Gene expression changes are a sensitive Gene expression changes are a sensitive
way to evaluate responseway to evaluate response Potential biomarkers of exposure/diseasePotential biomarkers of exposure/disease Drug discoveryDrug discovery
ToxChipToxChip
2,100 human genes2,100 human genes Involved in basic Involved in basic
cellular responsecellular response Involved in different Involved in different
types of toxic injurytypes of toxic injury Cellular pathways Cellular pathways
included:included:
Apoptosis Cell cycle control Cytochromes DNA replication and repair Estrogen responsive Heat shock proteins Kinases Oncogenes and tumor
suppressor genes Oxidative stress and redox
homeostasis P450’s Peroxisome proliferator
responsive Phosphatases Transcription Factors
Clustering and Toxicant IdentificationClustering and Toxicant Identification
MatchMatch
No Match
Group AGroup A
Group BGroup B
Group CGroup C
Known Agents
ToxicantSignature
PeroxisomePeroxisomeProliferatorsProliferators
Polycyclic AromaticPolycyclic AromaticHydrocarbonsHydrocarbonsOxidant StressorsOxidant Stressors
SuspectedToxicant
RawData
No Match
Identification of toxicologically Identification of toxicologically predictive gene sets using cDNA predictive gene sets using cDNA
microarraysmicroarrays
Russell S. Thomas, David R. Rank, Sharron G. Russell S. Thomas, David R. Rank, Sharron G. Penn, Gina M. Zastrow, Kevin R. Hayes, Kalyan Penn, Gina M. Zastrow, Kevin R. Hayes, Kalyan Pande, Edward Glover, Tomi Silander, Mark W. Pande, Edward Glover, Tomi Silander, Mark W. Craven, Janardan K. Reddy, Stevan B. Jovanovich Craven, Janardan K. Reddy, Stevan B. Jovanovich and Christopher A. Bradfieldand Christopher A. Bradfield
Molecular Pharmacology, 60:1189, 2001.Molecular Pharmacology, 60:1189, 2001.
Example mechanisms evaluated:Example mechanisms evaluated:
• Peroxisome proliferationPeroxisome proliferation
• Aryl hydrocarbon receptive agonistsAryl hydrocarbon receptive agonists
• Noncoplanar polychlorinated biphenylsNoncoplanar polychlorinated biphenyls
• InflammationInflammation
• HypoxiaHypoxia
Variation in expression of approximately 500 transcripts in 24 Variation in expression of approximately 500 transcripts in 24 experimental treatmentsexperimental treatments
From Thomas et al., Molecular From Thomas et al., Molecular Pharmacology, 2001Pharmacology, 2001
ConclusionsConclusions
• A diagnostic set of 12 liver gene transcript changes was A diagnostic set of 12 liver gene transcript changes was
identified to predict the five mechanisms.identified to predict the five mechanisms.
• The 12 transcripts included:The 12 transcripts included:
CYP1A2CYP1A2 FM05FM05 CYP4A14CYP4A14
IL-18IL-18 CUYP2B10CUYP2B10 CYP4A10CYP4A10
UnknownUnknown BHMTBHMT CYP2C29CYP2C29
CYP1A1CYP1A1 UnknownUnknown SAA1/2SAA1/2
• Only half of the changes in the diagnostic set were Only half of the changes in the diagnostic set were
previously described.previously described.
How does Genomics How does Genomics impact public policy?impact public policy?
Genomics may change who is “at risk” Genomics may change who is “at risk” by defining susceptible populationsby defining susceptible populations Identifying genetic polymorphismsIdentifying genetic polymorphisms Tightening of standards?Tightening of standards? Raises issue of ethical and legal Raises issue of ethical and legal
implicationsimplications
Language of RiskLanguage of RiskSignificant versus Negligible RiskSignificant versus Negligible Risk
StatuteStatute Risk MandateRisk Mandate
FIFRAFIFRA ““risks being less than benefits”risks being less than benefits”Balance risks, benefits, social and economic costsBalance risks, benefits, social and economic costsEfficacious, yet without “unreasonable risk to man or Efficacious, yet without “unreasonable risk to man or the environment”the environment”
FQPAFQPA ““reasonable certainty of no harm”reasonable certainty of no harm”Requires that tolerances be “safe” defined as Requires that tolerances be “safe” defined as “reasonable certainty that no harm will result from “reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure”aggregate exposure”Sets a uniform health based standard for riskSets a uniform health based standard for risk
Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, 1996; EPA, 2002
Interpreting Statutory Risk Interpreting Statutory Risk LanguageLanguage
Legal Cases:Legal Cases: Ober v. Whitman, 2000Ober v. Whitman, 2000 ALA v. EPA, 1998ALA v. EPA, 1998 Lead Industries v. EPA, 1980Lead Industries v. EPA, 19801970 Senate Report: 1970 Senate Report: ““particularly sensitive citizens such as particularly sensitive citizens such as
bronchial asthmatics and bronchial asthmatics and emphysematics”emphysematics”
““ambient standard necessary to ambient standard necessary to protect…sensitive group rather than a protect…sensitive group rather than a single person in such a group.” single person in such a group.”
Current Standards: children, the Current Standards: children, the elderly, and pre-existing elderly, and pre-existing diseasedisease
PM Staff Paper Risk Assessment, 2003:PM Staff Paper Risk Assessment, 2003: Mortality: Non-accidental total, Mortality: Non-accidental total,
cardiovascular and respiratorycardiovascular and respiratory Morbidity: Hospital Admissions Morbidity: Hospital Admissions
for Cardiovascular and for Cardiovascular and Respiratory causesRespiratory causes
Symptomatic: increased Symptomatic: increased respiratory symptomsrespiratory symptoms
“Adverse Health Effects”“Sensitive or Susceptible Individuals or Groups”
Toxicogenomics and Toxicogenomics and Clean Air StandardsClean Air Standards
EPA sets ambient air quality EPA sets ambient air quality standards to protect from “adverse standards to protect from “adverse effects” in susceptible subpopulations effects” in susceptible subpopulations with an adequate margin of safety.with an adequate margin of safety.
Are gene expression changes Are gene expression changes “adverse effects”?“adverse effects”?
Do gene expression changes trigger Do gene expression changes trigger “adequate margin of safety”?“adequate margin of safety”?
Adopted from Marchant, G; 2003
Federal Clean Air Act Federal Clean Air Act (CAA)(CAA)
Clean Air Act -- Title I
Research, investigation, training, and other activities (§103)
Criteria Pollutants, “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare” (§108)PM, SOx, NO2, CO, O3, and Lead
Hazardous Air Pollutants189 List established by Congress
(§112(b)(1))
• Promulgate primary and secondary air quality standards (§109)• Primary: “adequate margin of safety” (§109)• “sensitive or susceptible individuals or groups” from “adverse effects” (§108)
• coordinate and accelerate research, investigations…• cooperate with public and private agencies, institutions…• conduct investigations and research• establish technical advisory committees
• Health Effects Institute (NEI)• National Environmental Respiratory Center (NERC)• PM Research Centers• Advisory Committees
• “present…a threat of adverse human health effects” (§112(b))•Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT)• Feasible on technical and economic grounds
• Assessment of “residual risk” at a future time •Maximally Exposed Individual• 1/1,000,000 increased cancer (§112(f)(2)(A))
Human Health Risk Assessment Technology-Based Control Standard
Human Health Risk AssessmentAnnual Daily
PM10 50 µg/m3 150 µg/m3
PM2.5 15 µg/m3 65 µg/m3
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
National Research and Development
Benefits and future….Benefits and future….
Improve understanding of mechanism of Improve understanding of mechanism of action; pinpoint molecular targetaction; pinpoint molecular target Drug discovery and treatmentDrug discovery and treatment Regulatory standardsRegulatory standards
Predictive toxicology using databases; Predictive toxicology using databases; prioritize chemicals for testingprioritize chemicals for testing
Identification of quantification of Identification of quantification of susceptible populationssusceptible populations
Identification of biomarkers of chemical Identification of biomarkers of chemical exposure and effect.exposure and effect.
Challenges and Challenges and LimitationsLimitations
Assays must be reliable, rapid, accurateAssays must be reliable, rapid, accurate Need to recognize that gene expression is not equal to Need to recognize that gene expression is not equal to
functional or protein changes.functional or protein changes. Need to distinguish between normal gene response and Need to distinguish between normal gene response and
toxic response….are these methods predictive of toxicity?toxic response….are these methods predictive of toxicity? Standardization needed for genotype information and Standardization needed for genotype information and
database construction; sharing across agencies and database construction; sharing across agencies and research groupsresearch groups
Privacy, discrimination, stigma and psychological stress Privacy, discrimination, stigma and psychological stress issuesissues
Ethical, social and legal issues require active Ethical, social and legal issues require active involvement of stakeholdersinvolvement of stakeholders
““omics” is a powerful tool but should be considered on omics” is a powerful tool but should be considered on conjunction with traditional risk assessment practices.conjunction with traditional risk assessment practices.
Next time….Next time….
Review of the current risk Review of the current risk assessment processassessment process
How is genomics is influencing this How is genomics is influencing this process and key considerationsprocess and key considerations