environmental monitoring report · 2018. 1. 12. · 1 1. introduction overall project description...

Environmental Monitoring Report

This report has been submitted to ADB by the Program Management Unit, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s Public Communications Policy (2011). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB.

This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Project Number: 40648-033 December 2017 Period: January 2017 – June 2017

IND: Infrastructure Development Investment Program for Tourism - Tranche 2

Submitted by

Program Management Unit, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun

p_, ~ ii'~

Govt ot IJtlMekh,m<J

Program Management Unit lnfr,1strudun~ Dnclopmcnt luvestmcnt Prngrnm for Tourism

(,f IW A.\'.1-i.m'.i/ · · Loan ,Vt,. 2833, /11dio)

Government of Uttarakhand Pandit Deondyal Upadhayay Paryatan Bhawan, Nvar ONGC Helipad G.arhi Cantt, Dehradun -248003

f ()I: 91 ·135-2559987, Fax: 91-135-2559988 E-mail: [email protected]

r/t{1Xnlk.!t<1f11/

H<~f:'? b 1.2 /2-10-ADB IDI PT /223/2014-15

To

Date: 16.11.2017

Country Director,

Indian Hesident Mission (INRM),

Plot no -4, San Martin Marg, Chanakyapuri,

New Delhi ll0021, PB No .. 53311 (HPO)

Sub: Loan No. 2833 IND- IDIPT, UI< Revised Submission of Semiannual Safeguard Monitoring Report (Environment}, for January - June, 2017

Hef: PMU's letter no. 5542/2-10-ADB IDIPT/223/2014-15

Hespected Sir,

Please ff nd the revfseci Semiannual Environment Monitoring Hcport for your kind

perusal and approval.

Encl.:- As above

Yours Sincere ly

// J!11 I (11 (!'; -

(Purshottam)

Additional Program Director

,._; K--! i "" '

Semi – Annual Environmental Monitoring Report

Loan No: 2833 IND

Period: January to June 2017

IND: Infrastructure Development Investment Programme for Tourism,

Uttarakhand

(Tranche-II)

Prepared by Dept. of Tourism, Government of Uttarakhand for Asian

Development Bank

November, 2017

This Semi – Annual Environmental Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1

2. COMPLIANCE STATUS ......................................................................................... 23

3. COMPLIANCE STATUS WITH NATIONAL/ STATE/ LOCAL STATUTORY

ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................... 23

4. COMPLIANCE STATUS WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS AS STIPULATED

IN THE LOAN AGREEMENT ................................................................................... 25

5. COMPLIANCE STATUS WITH ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING

PLANS AS STIPULATED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AS AGREED

WITH ADB ........................................................................................................... 28

6. APPROACH & METHODOLOGY ENGAGED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF

THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................... 79

7. MONITORING OF ENVIRONMENTAL RECEPTORS/ ATTRIBUTES ............................... 79

8. IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN .................................. 80

9. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ....................................................................... 104

9.1 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR EMP IMPLEMENTATION .............................. 105

10. CONSULTATION DETAILS .................................................................................. 107

11. ANY OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS, IMPACTS OBSERVED DURING

IMPLEMENTATION WHICH WERE NOT COVERED EARLIER .................................... 112

12. DETAILS OF COMPLAINTS RECEIVED FROM PUBLIC AND ACTION TAKEN

THEREOF TO RESOLVE ..................................................................................... 112

13. FOLLOW UP ACTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS .......................................................... 112

List of Table

TABLE 1: PROJECT PROGRESS IN THE REPORTING PERIOD TILL 30TH

JUNE, 2017 ........................................................................................................ 2

TABLE 2: WORK DETAILS AND RISKS FOR SUB PROJECTS .......................... 6

TABLE 3: STATUS OF COMPLIANCE WITH EARF/ADB PROCEDURES* ....... 23

TABLE 4: STATUS OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND OTHER

CLEARANCE ................................................................................................... 24

TABLE 5: STATUS OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LOAN

COVENANTS ................................................................................................... 26

TABLE 6: EMP IMPLEMENTATION STATUS ..................................................... 28

TABLE 7: EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART ................................................. 33

TABLE 7(I): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART- ASAN BARRAGE .............. 33

TABLE 7(II): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART- TIGER FALL AND

LAKHAMANDAL ............................................................................................. 35

TABLE 7(III): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART- DEOBAN FOREST

REST HOUSE .................................................................................................. 37

TABLE 7 (IV): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART- DEVELOPMENT OF

ADVENTURE TOURIST CENTRES IN UTTARAKHAND .............................. 39

TABLE 7 (V): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART- DEVELOPMENT OF

TOURISM INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NORTH CORBETT ENTRY POINT

AT KOTDWARA .............................................................................................. 43

TABLE 7(VI): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART- SIGNAGES WORKS

IN UTTARAKHAND STATE ........................................................................... 49

TABLE 7(VII): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART- DEVELOPMENT OF

ADVENTURE TOURIST CENTRE AT TEHRI ................................................. 56

TABLE 7(VIII): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART - UPGRADATION OF

TOURIST FACILITIES AT TRH PARICHAY ................................................... 63

TABLE 7(IX): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART - AMELIORATION OF

LAKE NAUKUCHIATAL .................................................................................. 66

TABLE 7(X): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART - TREK TRAIL FROM

PITHORAGARH TO CHANDAK, PITHORAGARH ........................................ 69

TABLE 7(XI): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART - VIEW POINT AT

MOSTAMANU TEMPLE, PITHORAGARH ..................................................... 72

TABLE 7(XII): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART - CONSERVATION OF

PITHORAGARH FORT, PITHORAGARH ....................................................... 74

TABLE 7(XIII): EMP MONITORING STATUS CHART – DEVELOPMENT OF

ADVENTURE CENTRE AT BAUR JALASHAY ............................................. 76

TABLE 8: PARAMETERS AND METHODOLOGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL

MONITORING .................................................................................................. 79

TABLE 9 (I): IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

PLAN- FOR PROJECTS UNDER DSC DEHRADUN ..................................... 80

TABLE 9 (II): IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

PLAN- FOR PROJECTS UNDER DSC KOTDWAR ....................................... 91

TABLE 9 (III): IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

PLAN- FOR PROJECTS UNDER PIU BHIMTAL ........................................... 96

TABLE 10(I): STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION DETAILS FOR

PROJECTS UNDER PIU DEHRADUN.......................................................... 107

TABLE 10(II): STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION DETAILS FOR

PROJECTS UNDER PIU KOTDWAR ........................................................... 109

TABLE 10(III) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION DETAILS FOR

PROJECTS UNDER PIU BHIMTAL .............................................................. 111

LIST OF ANNEXURE

ANNEXURE: 1: PHOTO ILLUSTRATION PROJECTS UNDER PIU

DEHRADUN ................................................................................................... 113


KOTDWAR ..................................................................................................... 115


BHIMTAL ....................................................................................................... 117

ANNEXURE: 4: PHOTO ILLUSTRATION OF AWARENESS GENERATION

AND LABOUR WELFARE ACTIVITIES........................................................ 120

ANNEXURE: 5: ATTENDANCE RECORD OF CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES . 123

ANNEXURE: 6: CORRESPONDENCE WITH DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION

REGARDING CHANGE OF PROPOSED LOCATION BATURI –

PANCHESWAR IN CHAMPAWAT TO TANAKPUR CHAMPAWAT ........... 127

1

1. Introduction

Overall Project Description

1. The Infrastructure Development Investment Program for Tourism Financing Facility (the Facility) will develop

and improve basic urban infrastructure and services in the four participating states of Himachal Pradesh, Punjab,

Uttarakhand and Tamil Nadu—to support the tourism sector as a key driver for economic growth. It will focus on:

(i) strengthening connectivity to and among key tourist destinations; (ii) improving basic urban infrastructure and

services, such as water supply, road and public transport, solid waste management and environmental

improvement, at existing and emerging tourist destinations to ensure urban amenities and safety for the visitors,

and protect nature and culture-based attractions. Physical infrastructure investments will be accompanied by: (iii)

capacity building programs for concerned sector agencies and local communities for better management of the

tourist destinations and for more active participation in the tourism-related economic activities, respectively.

2. The proposed Project targets enhanced economic growth and provision of livelihood opportunities for local

communities through tourism infrastructure development with a focus on preservation and development of

natural and cultural heritage and incidental services. The Project supports the state of Uttarakhand to develop

the tourism sector as a key driver for economic growth.

3. The Executing Agency (EA) for the Investment Program is Dept. of Tourism, Govt. of Uttarakhand. The Loan

Agreement and Project Agreement for the IDIPT, Uttarakhand is 2833-IND. Project Implementation Unit have

been established in three towns respectively (Dehradun, Bhimtal and Kotdwar) for implementation of sub-

projects. Design and Supervision Consultants (DSCs), has already been established in three towns for designing

the Infrastructure, managing the tendering of Contractors and supervising construction, and providing support to

the PIUs.

Outputs of the Project

4. The outputs of the Project are as follows:

Component 1: Urban Infrastructure and Service Improvement

� World class infrastructure comprising of gardens, fountains and water sports developed

along the banks of Ganga Canal at Haridwar; (project held in abeyance)

� Tourist facilities at Parichay and Naukuchiyatal Lake upgraded and developed;

� Tourist support infrastructure at Pithoragarh improved;

� Tourist facilities developed at Hanol Temple, Tiger Falls, Deoban, Lakhamandal and Tree

Samadhi (Tree Samadhi component dropped);

� 9 Adventure tourism centers established across the state; and

� North Corbett entry point improved.

Component 2: Improved connectivity

� Walk-way at Asan Barrage; and

� Trek trail connecting Pithoragarh to Chandak.

Component 3: Quality Enhancement of Natural and Cultural Attractions

� Water sports tourism facility developed at Asan Barrage Dehradun;

� Jagjitpur/ Silt ejector canal at Haridwar improved;

2

� Pithoragarh Fort conserved; and

� Naukuchiyatal lake Ameliorated

Component 4: Greater participation by local communities

Component 5: Capacity Development, Community Participation and Project Management

Environment Category

5. The project under IDIPT was categorized as Environment Category “B”, according to ADB’s Safeguard Policy

Statement (2009). All the subprojects under execution have been categorized as category B.

Environment Performance Indicators, if any

6. For effective monitoring, selected environmental parameters have been identified as indicators which may be

qualitatively and quantitatively measured and compared over a period of time in order to assess/ ensure the

compliance to environmental management plans (EMPs). The environmental performance indicators selected

are physical, biological and social characteristics identified as most important in affecting the environment at

critical locations all along the sub project corridors. The parameters identified as performance indicators are:

� Compliance with environmental management and monitoring plan

� Compliance to State/ National environmental regulations.

� Monitoring of ambient air quality, water quality and noise levels and comparison with baseline

environmental quality and State/ National Standards.

Overall project progress, agreed milestones and Implementation schedule

7. Construction status of the sub projects is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Project Progress in the Reporting Period till 30th June, 2017

SI.

No.

Package Ref No. General

Description

Goods or

Works

Contract

Signing

Date

Name of the Contractor Contract

Value

Contract

period in

months

1 UK/IDIPT/DDN/01 Development of

Tourism

infrastructure

facilities at Asan

Barrage

Dehradun- Lot 1

10.2.2014 M/S Rajendra Kumar

Tripathi, Pratapgarh

INR

3.03 Crores

18 +5


Tourism

infrastructure

facilities at Asan

Barrage

Dehradun- Lot 2

Dropped


Yamuna Circuit

(Tiger Falls &

Lakhamandal

Temple)- Lot 1

9.6.2014 M/S Aradhya Engineers

and Construction & Pvt.

Ltd, Rishikesh

INR

1.84 Crores

18+ 1.5

4 UK/IDIPT/DDN/04 Development of MoU signing Under Force Accounts 0.26 Crores 12 + 11

3

SI.

No.


Description

Goods or

Works

Contract

Signing

Date


Value

Contract

period in

months

Yamuna Circuit

(Deoban)- Lot 2

date

18.9.2014

MoU has been signed

with Forest Dept.


Yamuna Circuit

(HanolMahasu) -

Lot 3

15.5.2014 M/S Dagmo Riba Itanagar INR

8.76Crores

18 +18

Adventure Sports Centre (Goods)

6 UK/IDIPT/DDN/06

B - Lot 1 –P1

Development of

Adventure tourist

Centre

20.05.2017 M/s Rite Equipment

JV Bangalore

Bangalore

INR

8.24 Crore

18

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06

A - Lot 1 –P2 Development of

Adventure tourist

Centre

29.04.2017 M/s Litmus Marine

Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

3, Anurag Business

Centre, Near Amar

Cinema, Chembur,

Mumbai - 400071

INR

8.40 Crore

18

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06

A - Lot 1 –P3 Development of

Adventure tourist

Centre

17.10.2016 M/s R & R Adventure

J/V, 30 Kiran Vihar,

Delhi

30 Kiran Vihar, Delhi

INR

1.97 Crore

18

Adventure Sports Centre (Works)

7 UK/IDIPT/DDN/06-

Lot2 P1

Development of

Adventure

Tourist Centre-

Bageshwar-

Kapkot

30.05.2016 M/s Samir Kumar

Mishra,Badripur,Dehradun

INR

0.58 lakhs

18

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06-

Lot2 P2

Development of

Adventure

Tourist Centre-

Champawat-

Tanakpur1

30.05.2016 M/s Samir Kumar

Mishra,Badripur,Dehradun

INR 0.58

Lacs

18

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06-

Lot2 P2

Development of

Adventure

Tourist Centre-

Pauri

07.06.2016 M/s Kailash Bisht JV with

Laxman Prasad Daya

Bhawan,Agency

chowk,Dehradun

INR 0.56

Lacs

18

8 UK/IDIPT/KOT/01 Development of

North Entry in

Corbett Sub-

project


11.31Crores

17+15

9 UK/IDIPT/KOT/02 Signage Sub- 30.12.2014 M/s Reynober SA, Madrid INR 18+7

1 Proposed Location Baturi-Pancheswar in Champawat was changed to Tanakpur-Champawat due to

administrative reasons. Addendum to IEE Development of Adventure Tourist Centres in Uttarakhand is under

process.

4

SI.

No.


Description

Goods or

Works

Contract

Signing

Date


Value

Contract

period in

months

project in

Uttarakhand

Spain in JV with M/s

Prabhatam Advertising

Pvt. Ltd.

47.08 Crores

10 UK/IDIPT/KOT/03-

Lot-1

Adventure

Sports Centre at

Tehri under PIU

Kotdwar - Lot 1


Innovation Pvt. Ltd.,

Mumbai

3.72 Crores 17+6

11 UK/IDIPT/KOT/03-

Lot-2

Adventure

Sports Centre at

Tehri under PIU

Kotdwar - Lot 2

30.12.2014 M/s Sunil Garg& Co. in JV

with M/s Jai Durgey

Trading and Construction

Co.

INR

13.53Crores

17+7

12 UK/IDIPT/KOT/04 Haridwar Ganga

Canal(1.83 M

US$)

Held in abeyance

13 UK/IDIPT/KOT/05 Beautification of

Jagjitpur/Silt

ejector canal at

Haridwar (1.33

M US$)

Held in abeyance

14 UK/IDIPT/BHT/01 Upgradation of

Tourist Facilities

at TRH Parichay


4.62Crores

18+13

15 UK/IDIPT/BHT/02 Amelioration of

Lake

Naukuchiatal

26.6.2014 M/S Global Aqua

Treatment Technology

Pvt. Ltd, Rudrapur

INR

13.51 Crores

12+ 3

year O&M

16 UK/IDIPT/BHT/03

Lot 1

Trek Trail from

Pithoragarh to

Chandak

3.6.2014 M/S Soar Valley

Construction & JS

Matiyani, Pithoragarh

INR

0.89 Crores

12+18

17 UK/IDIPT/BHT/03

Lot 2

View Point at

Mostamanu

Temple

3.6.2014 M/S Soar Valley

Construction & JS

Matiyani, Pithoragarh

INR

0.99Crores

12+11

18 UK/IDIPT/BHT/03

Lot 3

Conservation of

Pithoragarh Fort

25.09.2014 M/s Dagmo Riba Itanagar INR 4.55

Crores

12+15

19 UK/IDIPT/BHT/04

Lot-1

Development of

Adventure

Center

BaurJalasaya

Lot-1


Innovation Pvt. Ltd.,

Mumbai

INR

6.13 Crores

17+4

20 UK/IDIPT/BHT/04

Lot-2

Development of

Adventure

Center

06.06.15 M/S Dagmo Riba, Rohini

Delhi

INR

8.17 Crores

17+4

5

SI.

No.


Description

Goods or

Works

Contract

Signing

Date


Value

Contract

period in

months

BaurJalasaya

Lot-2

8. Progress of the work during reporting period is shown in Table 2.

Photographs showing project progress are given in Annexure 1, 2 and 3.

6

Table 2: Work Details and Risks For sub projects

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land

clearance) and schedule

date of completion

Type of works

Continued at Present

Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the

objective Starting date Date of Completion

UK/IDIPT/DDN/01-

LOT-1

Development of

Tourism

infrastructure

facilities at Asan

Barrage Dehradun-

Lot 1

Shri Rajendra Kumar Tripathy

• Admin. & kitchen block

• Cottages for tourists

• Security Cabin • Dormitory toilet • Open restaurant • Public toilets • Boating Deck • Viewing Deck • Signage • Floating Pontoon • Pathways

• Open sitting with

children Play area

• Landscaping

• Pump Room

• Over Head Water

Tank

• Parking

08.03.14 Handover on 30.04.2016

Completed all activity and handed over to GMVN for Operation and Maintenance

100% No change Appropriate measures has been taken for fulfillment of the objectives

NA

7

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


UK/IDIPT/DDN/03

Development of Yamuna Circuit Lot

1 (Tiger Falls & Lakhamandal

Temple)

M/S Aradhya

Engineers and

Construction & Pvt.

Ltd, Rishikesh

Tiger Fall

• Entrance Arch • Pathways

• Railing • Parking • Informative and

directional Signage • Bridge • External

Electrification • Prefab Toilet • Kiosk and Toilet at

parking lot • changing room and

Kiosk at fall site • sitting benches • Retaining and

Breast Wall with K.C Drains

• Pargola • Welcome Arches

Lakhamandal

• Path way • Parking area • Public Toilet

• Renovation of Entrance gate

09.06.2014 Tigerfall Handover on 4th April 16

and

Lakhamandal handed over on 13th May 16

Finishing work of all activities

100% No change in Tiger Falls Site.

Few changes suggested by ASI were incorporated

(Parking was shifted outside the ASI regulated zone)

.

NA

8

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


• Renovation of Public Toilet

• Electrical and solarlights

• Pathway to cave • Welcome Arches

UK/IDIPT/DDN/05

Development of Yamuna Circuit Lot 3 (Hanol Mahasu &

Tree Samadhi**)

M/S Dagmo Riba Itanagar

• Entrance Arch • Road • Dias Platform • Pathways

• Stairs • Heritage Railing • Parking • Drinking Water

Fountain • Informative and

directional Signage • External

Electrification • Kitchen and

Longer • Pre-fab Toilet • Guest House • Retaining and

Breast Wall with K.C Drains

• Welcome Arches

15.05.2014 14.11.2015

Extended upto

20.07.2017

Process for handing

over the project to

Temple Committee is

in process,

Wooden entrance

Gate:- Wooden

carving at entrance

gate work is in

progress.

TRH :- Plastering work completed and Internal finishing such as floor tile, colour washing to be started.

72.00% Snanghat, Kiosk, has been dropped due to land unsuitable for construction

Renovation of existing TRH

Plastering

Flooring

Electrical and sanitation works have been taken up

Works in ASI regulated zone have been completed

No risks envisaged

9

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


UK/IDIPT/DDN/04 Under

Force

Accounts

MoU has

been

signed with

Forest

Dept.

• Landscaping,

Fencing and

plantation

• Renovation of

FRH

• Water Boring

and Water

Supply

• Other facilities(procurement of portable solar lanterns, portable tents, canteen equipments, Binoculars, torch and LPG gas

18.08.2014 17.08.2015

Overhead Tank fitting and supply. Works almost completed, only commissioning of water system not executed.

95% No Appropriate measures has been taken for fulfillment of the objectives

None.

Works completed.

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 Lot 2 –P-1 (W) Location- Bageshwar-Kapkot

M/s Samir

Kumar

Mishra

Civil work: Staff Residence and Interpretation Centre

30.05.2016 30.11.2017 RCC retaining wall work of third lift work in progress. Work slowed due to continuous heavy rain and cloud burst at Kapkot.

4.00 % No change so far

Work slowed due to late land (17.02.2017) allotment, and continuous heavy rain

Weather disturbances may affect project progress

10

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 Lot 2- P-2 (W)

Location- Champawat-Tanakpur2

M/s Samir

Kumar

Mishra


30.05.2016 30.11.2017 Finishing work such as plastering works in progress and procures other finishing items materials at site such as floor tile, wooden D &W etc.

54.50% Proposed location for the Center in Champawat Baturi-Pancheswar was shifted to Tanakpur in Champawat due to administrative reasons. Addendum to IEE is under process. Correspondence details attached

Annexure 6

Work progress is satisfactory

Appropriate measures has been taken for fulfillment of the objectives

2 Proposed Location Baturi-Pancheswar in Champawat was changed to Tanakpur-Champawat due to administrative reasons. Addendum to IEE Development of Adventure

Tourist Centres in Uttarakhand is under process.

11

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 Lot 2-P-3 (W)

Location- Pauri

M/s Kailash Bisht Jv withLaxman Prasad Daya Bhawan Agences chowk , Pauri.UK


07.06.2016 06.12.2017 Interpretation Center: - Color washing and final finishing work is in progress. Caretaker Room: - Color washing and final finishing work is in progress.

47.00% No change so far

Work progress is slow due to weather condition

Appropriate measures has been taken for fulfillment of the objectives

Weather disturbances may affect project progress

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 B - Lot 1 –P1 (G)

M/s Rite

Equipment

JV

Bangalore

Supply of goods 20.05.2017 19.11.2017 Work order issued

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 A - Lot 1 –P2 (G)

M/s Litmus

Marine

Innovation

Pvt. Ltd. ,

Mumbai

Supply of goods 29.04.2017 28.10.2017 Work order issued

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 A - Lot 1 –P3 (G)

M/s R & R

Adventure

J/V,

Delhi

Supply of goods 17.10.2016 16.04.2017 Supply of goods completed at UTDB office

12

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Naukuchiyatal UK/IDIPT/BHT/01

M/S Dagmo Riba Itanagar

• TRC Restaurant

• TRH Main Building

• LA Works

• Annexe Building

• Dormitory

• Services

• Electrical Work

• Tent Platform

30.07.2014 Extended upto 30-07-2017

A-

Restaurant Building

(82.20%)

Electrical work

(wireing, point, G. I.

box, modular etc. work)

is under progress.

Expose stone masonry

varnish coating work is

under progress.

B- Main Building

(34.96%)

Cleaning of Stone

surface is under

progress.

False Ceiling work is

under progress.

Repairing and Fixing of

wooden purlins (for

roofing) are under

progress.

Repairing and refixing

of wooden beams are

under progress.

Fixing of GI sheet is

under progress.

Lean concrete under

flooring is under

progress.

Anti Termite Treatment

(A. T. T.) work under

63.53% Minor change

as per site

requirement

Appropriate

measures have

been taken for

fulfillment of the

objectives

Not

anticipated,

only in case of

force majeure

13

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


flooring is under

progress.

Fixing of GI Ridge &

Hips work is under

progress.

Cement plaster work is

under progress.

Wooden window

panelled and glazed

shutter making works

are under progress

Toilet brick work is

under progress.

Wooden flooring work

is under progress. x-

Wooden railing work is

under progress.

Ground floor chir wood

false ceiling work is

under progress.

C-L. A. Work

(76.24%) Pathway work is under

Progress.

Local Patal work over

Amphitheater steps is

under progress.

Cafe deck works are

under progress.

Surface preparation

work is under progress

14

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


for landscaping.

Doob grass work is

under progress.

m- R. R. Masonry work

for dry stone pitching is

under progress.

o-Kota Stone fixing in

stair work is under

progress.

p- Gravel path is under

progress.

Annexe

Building (60.82%) Flooring work is under

progress.

Toilet wall & floor tile

fixing work are under

progress.

Door & window fixture


progress.

E- Dormitory Building (90.14%).

Toilet floor & wall tile


progress.

UPVC door frame &

panel fixing is under

progress.

Roof painting work is

under progress.

15

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


Expose stone masonry

varnish coating work is

under progress.

F-Services (38.29%)

G-Rehabilitation of

Tent Platform

(98.73%)

Amelioration of Lake Naukuchiatal,

Naukuchiatal UK/IDIPT/BHT/02

M/S Global Aqua

Treatment Technology Pvt. Ltd, Rudrapur

• Construction of Compressor Houses (3 Nos.)

• Supply of Compressors & Aeration System

• Installation & Commissioning

• Operation & Maintenance Bio

manipulation

10-09-2014 O & M upto 21-07-2018

A- Compressor House Complete

B-Supply, Installation of compressors and Aeration system: Complete Bio manipulation and O&M is in progress.

100% O & M and

Biomanipulation work is in progress

No change Appropriate measures have

been taken for fulfillment of the objectives

In case of any

violation of the conditions of Irrigation Dept.

Development of Adventure Tourist Center at BaurJalashay

UK/IDIPT/BHT//04- LOT1 (Goods)

M/s Litmus Marine Innovation Ltd.

Procurement of

Adventure Sports

Equipment for Lot 2

below

06.06.15

05.11.16

Physical

Progress-

87.97%

No change

Appropriate

measures have

been taken for

fulfillment of the

objectives

NA

16

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


Development of Adventure Tourist Center at Baur Jalashay

UK/IDIPT/BHT//04-LOT2

(Works)

M/s Dagmo Riba, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh

Construction of

Parking area,

Reception,

Interpretation Center,

Entrance Plaza,

Restaurant Dormitory,

Double bed rooms,

Equipment store

(Boat House), First

aid facility, Staff

Accomodation,

Entertainment area,

Public Convenience,

Watch Tower,

Waterscape, Children

Play area, Floating

jetty

30.06.15

extended upto 31.03.17

(1) Boat House

Restaurant-

Erection of

Column, Earth

filling &

compaction ramp

near activity

ground work in

progress 55%

work completed.

(2) Toilet Block-

Procurement of

material is in

process- 81%

work completed.

(3) Swimming Pool

Area-

Procurement of

material in

process- 71%

work completed.

(4) Main Building-

Plinth, brick

work, earth filling

completed, PCC

work and

Antitermite

treatment in

Physical

Progress-

53.95%

No change so

far

Excessive

rainfall may

raise the water

level of the

reservoir

which may

delay the

works.

Cooperation of

Irrigation

Dept. is

necessary

17

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


progress- 35%

work completed,

(5) Staff Quarter-

Procurement of

door, window,

shutter, roofing &

railing. Iron work

in progress- 75%

work completed.

(6) Pathway- Tile

work in progress,

(7) Landscape work

near swimming

Pool- Grassing

work in internal

court yard and

activity ground,

other places as

ramp preparation

& hedge work in

progress- 45%

work completed.

(8) Internal

electrification

15% completed

& External

Electrification-

Mostly treching

18

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


completed.

(9) Septic tank-

100% work

completed.

Trek Trail from Pithoragarh to Chandak, Pithoragarh UK/IDIPT/BHT/03

Lot 1

M/S Soar Valley Construction & GS Matiyani,

Pithoragarh

• Nature trail • Pilgrim trail • Viewing shelter • Seat walls • Open restaurant • Featured outlook • Planting • Stabilization of

ruins

22-06-2014 completed A-Nature Trail : Complete B-Pilgrim Trail : Complete Site handing over is

under progress.

100% Ruins

stabilization

works have

been

dropped

Appropriate measures have been taken for fulfillment of the objectives

NA

View Point at Mostamanu Temple, Pithoragarh UK/IDIPT/BHT/03 Lot 2

M/S Soar Valley Construction & GS Matiyani, Pithoragarh

• Boundary Wall • Toilet Block • Pathways • Seat Wall Cluster • Services • Viewing shelter • Signage & Dust Bin • Lighting Plan • Shop Platform • Relocated Room • Paving • Ampi theater • Tree Platform

22-06-2014 completed Complete Note: 1- Project is handed over to temple committee.

100% Shop platform works have been dropped due to objection of temple committee.

Appropriate measures have been taken for fulfillment of the objectives

NA

19

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


• Stairway • Shoe Storage

Conservation of Pithoragarh Fort, Pithoragarh UK/IDIPT/BHT/03 Lot 3

M/S Degmo Riba, Itanagar

• Demolition of Buildings

• Landscaping Works • Lighting Plan • Planting Plan • Restoration of Fort

Wall • Restoration of

Tehsil Office • Restoration of

Tehsil Residence • Restoration of SDM

Camp Office • Restoration of

Record Rooms • Signage and Waste

bins

13-10-2014 Extended 31.03.2017

1- Demolition of Buildings (100%) A-Store and Toilet Dismantling work of Kanungo Office, Khatouni building,Tehsil Abhilekhakar has been completed. 2-L.A.Work (25%) 3-Restoration of fort wall (25.77%) Pointing work for inside fort wall is under progress. 4-Restoration of Tehsildar Residence (80%) 5-Restoration of S.D.M. Camp Office (50%) 6-Restoration of Record Room (90%) 7-Restoration of Tehsil Office (6.14%)

59.35% Minor Change as per site requirement

Appropriate measures have been taken for fulfillment of the objectives.

Community support is necessary for the fulfillment of objectives

UK/IDIPT/KOT/01 Development of

M/S DagmoRib

Kotdwara gateway

and destination

09-07-2014 08-12-2015

08-12-2015 (

1- Finishing works on cottages for tourists

89.00% No change anticipated so

Compliance with EMP and

In case there is no compliance

20

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


North Entry in Corbett Sub-project

a, Itanagar connectivity, including

Visitor Information,

Facilitation and

Reception Centre

(384 m2);

Amphitheatre

Complex with toilet

block, food court,

Kitchen, Handicraft

stall (1400 m2);

Cottages for tourists

(4 Nos., 105 m2);

Convention Centre

cum restaurant (292

m2); Staff quarters

(100 m2); Overhead

Reservoir (60 m2);

Entrance Gate with

Security and Booking

counter (30 m2) /

landscaping and

Signage.

Extension has been granted up to August, 31, 2017

under progress

2- Convention Center cum restaurant finishing work under progress

3-Interpretation Center - Construction work is in progress

4- LPG Gas godown works are in progress

5- Landscape, tree plantation and pathway works in progress

6- Internal electrical works in progress

7- Fountain works are in progress

far beyond the granted extension period

monitoring plan are being ensured

with EMP mitigation and monitoring plan during construction and operation. phases

21

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


UK/IDIPT/KOT/02

Signage Sub-

project in

Uttarakhand

M/s Reynober SA, Madrid Spain in JV with M/s Prabhatam Advertising Pvt. Ltd

Signages work in Uttarakhand State

30.12.2014 30-06-2016 (Extension Granted up to March 31, 2017)

1- Signage work in 13 districts is in progress

2- Special signages construction works are in progress

3- Foundation works of 2022 signages completed (98 %

complete)

89% No change anticipated so far

The contractor has been instructed not to leave sites untidy and regular visits to sites are taken up

No risk as minor works for signage erection required

UK/IDIPT/KOT/03-

Lot-2

Adventure Sports Centre at Tehri under PIU Kotdwar - Lot 2

M/s Sunil Garg& Co. in JV with M/s Jai Durgey

Trading and Construction Co.

1-Reception & visitor

facilitation/

information center.

(760 Sqm. Floor

area)

2- Personal

Adventure and

Tourists recreation

facilities

1. House Boats/

Cruise boat

2. Canoeing

3. Kayaking

30.12.2014 30-05-2016 ( Extension Granted up to Apr 30, 2017 )

1- Finishing works of adventure sports Centre completed.

2- Minor repair for building under progress

3- Construction camp

under demolition

4- Landscaping works under progress

100% No change Compliance with EMP and environmental monitoring plan and regular

orientation and training of workforce on safeguards issues

In case there is no compliance with EMP during

operation phases

22

Name & No. of

Package

Name of

the

contractor

Listing of works

under the package

Starting Date(land


date of completion

Type of works


Progress

in %

Expected

change from

Approved

scope

Fulfillment of

objective Type

of remedial

measures

needed

Key

assumption

and risk affect

attainment the


4. Zorbing

5. Jet Ski

6. Jet Boating

Angling

UK/IDIPT/KOT/03-

Lot-1

Adventure Sports Centre at Tehri under PIU Kotdwar - Lot 1

M/s Litmus Marine Innovation Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Procurement of

equipment and

safety gadgets for

Adventure Sports

Centre

27-01-2015 27-06-2016 ( extension granted up to March 31, 2017)

Major equipments have been procured and are stored at Adventure Sports Centre (W) site

79.98% No change anticipated so far.

Safe use of equipment during operation phase.

Chances of accident occurrence in operation phase if proper

safety measures are not followed by the facility operators and tourists

9. Any other information useful for assessing environmental performance of the project:

No additional information during this period

23

2. Compliance Status

10. Status of Compliance with EARF/ADB Procedures is shown in the following table:

Table 3: Status of Compliance with EARF/ADB Procedures*

Name & No. of Package Environment

Category Status of

preparation of IEE

Status of Approval by ADB

Date of Approval

Further Action needed For

Compliance & Responsibility

UK/IDIPT/DDN/ 01-Lot-1 B Completed and approved

Approved 01.01.2014 Regular monitoring and reporting of the

EMP UK/IDIPT/DDN/ 03 B Completed and

approved Approved 29.04.2014 Regular monitoring

and reporting of the EMP

UK/IDIPT/DDN/04 B Completed and approved

Approved 21.11.2016 Regular monitoring and reporting

UK/IDIPT/DDN/ 05 B Completed and approved


EMP UK/IDIPT/DDN/ 06-LoT-23

(W) B Completed and



UK/IDIPT/KOT/ 01 B Completed and approved

Approved 31-03-2014

Regular monitoring and reporting of

EMP UK/IDIPT/KOT /03-Lot-2 B Completed and

approved Approved 31-03-

2014 Regular monitoring

and reporting of EMP

UK/IDIPT/BHT/01

B Completed and approved


EMP UK/IDIPT/BHT/02 B Completed and



UK/IDIPT/BHT/03 Lot 1 B Completed and approved


EMP

UK/IDIPT/BHT/03 Lot 2 B Completed and



UK/IDIPT/BHT/03 Lot 3 B Completed and



UK/IDIPT/BHT/04Lot-2 B Completed and



*Only Works packages reported

3. Compliance Status with National/ State/ Local statutory environmental requirements

11. Status of Compliance with National/ State/ Local statutory environmental requirements is shown in the given table:

3 01 of the locations of the sub project Baturi-Pancheshwar in Champawat was shifted to Tanakpur in

Champawat due to administrative reasons. The addendum to IEE is under process.

24

Table 4: Status of Environment, Forest and other Clearance

Work (Package No.)

Applicable

Legislation/Type

of clearance

Clearance Given

by and date

Subject/I

ssue Remarks/Action needed

UK/IDIPT/DDN/01-LOT-1

Development of Tourism infrastructure facilities at Asan Barrage Dehradun- Lot 1

NOC from forest department

Chief wild Life Warden , Uttarakhand vide letter No 2260/3-6 dated 10th April 2013

Nil

Construction work complete as per conditions of the Clearance from the Chief Wild Life Warden

UK/IDIPT/DDN/03

Development of Yamuna Circuit (Tiger Falls &

Lakhamandal Temple)- Lot 1

NOC from ASI is required for works in the ASI regulated zone of Lakhamandal temple

NOC obtained from ASI on 25.02.2016

Nil Construction work complete as per clearance from ASI

UK/IDIPT/DDN/04

Deovan FRH

Executed by the Forest Dept. under Force Accounts

Nil Work almost complete

UK/IDIPT/DDN/05

Development of Yamuna Circuit (Hanol Mahasu & Tree

Samadhi) - Lot 3

NOC from ASI is required for works in the ASI regulated zone of

Hanol Mahasu temple

NOC Obtained from ASI 0n 25.02.2016

Nil Temple works completed as per conditions of NOC from ASI

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 Lot 2 P-1

Development of Adventure

Tourist Centre-Kapkot

Nil No Clearance required as construction is being done at

existing land of UTDB


Development of Adventure Tourist Centre-Tanakpur

Nil No Clearance required as construction is being done at existing land of UTDB


Development of Adventure Tourist Centre-Pauri

Nil Renovation of existing TRH

No NOC is required

UK/IDIPT/KOT/01

Development of Tourism infrastructure for North Corbett Entry Point at Kotdwar

No environmental and forest

clearance requirement.

Not applicable Nil No action needed

UK/IDIPT/KOT/03-Lot-2

Adventure Sports Centre at Tehri under PIU Kotdwar - Lot

No environmental and forest clearance

Not applicable Nil No action needed

4 01 of the locations of the sub project Baturi-Pancheshwar in Champawat was shifted to Tanakpur in

Champawat due to administrative reasons. The addendum to IEE is under process. The correspondence details

are attached in Annexure 6.

25

Work (Package No.)

Applicable

Legislation/Type

of clearance

Clearance Given

by and date

Subject/I

ssue Remarks/Action needed

2 requirement.

UKIDIPT/BHT/01

Up gradation of Tourist

Facilities at TRH Parichay at

Naukuchiatal

NOC from KMVN MD, KMVN, vide letter no. 3087, dated 08-08-2013

Nil No action needed

UKIDIPT/ BHT/02

Amelioration of Lake

Naukuchiatal at Bhimtal

NOC from Irrigation Dept.

Chief Engineer, (North) vide letter no. D-57, dated 12-02-2013

Asst. Engineer, Jal Sansthan, Nainital, vide letter no3084, dated 25-10-2013

Nil O&M under process.

No action needed

UKIDIPT/ BHT/03/Lot-1

Trek Trail from Pithoragarh to Chandak at Pithoragarh

NOC from Forest Department,

Nagar palika,

Van Panchayat

DFO Pithoragarh vide letter No 2378/12-1 dated 15-02-2014

Executive Officer, Nagar Palika, Pithoragarh, vide letter dated 11-09-

2013

Sarpanch of Vanpanchayat, Bajethi dated 08-01-2014

Nil Works completed. No action needed

UKIDIPT/ BHT/03/Lot-2

Work of View Point in Mostamanu Temple at Pithoragarh

NOC from Mostamanu Temple Committee

Van Panchayat &

Gram Panchayat

Mostmanu Temple Committee, dated 12-09-2013

Vanpanchayat, Bakarkatia dated 17-02-2014

Gram Pradhan,

DhungaBhool, dated 17-02-2014

Nil Works completed. No action needed

UK/IDIPT/BHT/04-LOT-2

(Works)

NOC from Irrigation Dept., Uttarakhand

Irrigation Dept., Uttarakhand on 7th Nov, 2013

Nil Work is being carried out as

per directions of Irrigation Dept.

4. Compliance status with the environmental covenants as stipulated in the Loan Agreement

12. The status of compliance with environmental loan covenants is presented below:

26

Table 5: Status of Compliance with Environmental Loan Covenants

S.

No Covenants Compliance

1. The Borrower and the States shall ensure that the

preparation, design, construction, implementation,

operation and decommissioning of each Subproject and

all Project facilities comply with (a) all applicable laws

and regulations of the Borrower and the States relating

to environment, health, and safety; (b) the Environment

Safeguards; (c) the EAFR; and (d) all measures and

requirements set forth in the respective IEE and EMP,

and any corrective or preventative actions set forth in a

Safeguard Monitoring Report.

Compliance of (a) all applicable laws and regulations

of the Borrower and the States relating to

environment, health, and safety (b) Environment

Safeguards; (c) the EARF; and (d) EMP is being

ensured during sub projects implementation.

Safeguards – Related Provisions in Bidding

Documents and Works Contracts

The States shall ensure that all bidding documents and

contracts for Works contain provisions that require

contractors to:

(a) Comply with the measures and requirement

relevant to the contractor set forth in the IEE, the

EMPs, any RO and any IPP (to the extent they

concern impacts on affected people during

construction), and any corrective or preventative

actions set out in a Safeguard Monitoring Report;

(b) make available a budget for all such environment

and social measures;

(c ) provide the relevant State with a written notice of

any unanticipated environmental, resettlement or

indigenous peoples risks or impacts that arise

during construction, implementation or operation of

the Project that were not considered in the IEE, the

EMP, the or the IPP (if any): and

(d) Fully reinstate pathways, other local infrastructure,

and agricultural land to at least their pre-project

condition upon the completion of construction.

EMPs are made part of the contract agreements of

respective subprojects andare being complied with.

Orientation sessions are being carried out in each

site for better understanding of Safeguards

Compliance by the Contractor

Environmental monitoring and mitigation costs

allocated/ incorporated in contract agreements.

No such environmental impact has been identified so

for that was not considered in the IEE and in the

EMP. (If any such impact arises in future, will be

suitably addressed)

All the areas that if disturbed by construction

activities will be restored to pre-project condition by

the contractors.

Safeguards Monitoring and Reporting

11. The States shall do the following:

(a) Submit semi-annual Safeguards Monitoring

Reports to ADB and disclose relevant information

from such reports to affected persons promptly

upon submission;

(b) if any unanticipated environment and/or social

The seventh semiannual report is submitted herewith.

Subsequent reports will be submitted on time.

In case of any unanticipated environmental risks and

27

S.

No Covenants Compliance

risks and impacts arise during construction,

implementation or operation of the Project that

were not considered in the IEE, the EMP, any RP

or any IPP, promptly inform ADB of the

occurrence of such risks or impacts, with detailed

description of the event and proposed corrective

action plan; and Report any breach of compliance

with the measures and requirements set forth in

the EMP, any IPP promptly after becoming aware

of the breach.

impacts arise, that shall be immediately informed to

ADB with detailed description of the event and

proposed corrective action plan.

Breach will be reported to ADB immediately after

becoming aware of it.

28

5. Compliance Status with Environment Management and Monitoring Plans as stipulated in the

environmental documentation as agreed with ADB

13. The compliance Status with Environment Management and Monitoring Plan is shown in the following table:

Table 6: EMP Implementation Status

S.

No

Sub Project Name EMP Part of

Contract

Documents

EMP being

Implemented

Status of EMP

Implementation

Actions Proposed/

Additional Corrective

Measures Required

(Yes/No) (Yes/ No) (Excellent/

Satisfactory/

Partially

Satisfactory/

Below

Satisfaction)

1. UK/IDIPT/DDN/01-LOT-1

Development of Tourism infrastructure facilities at Asan Barrage Dehradun- Lot 1

Yes Yes Satisfactory. Operation phase monitoring is being done

Proposed activity has been completed and asset handed over to GMVN

2 UK/IDIPT/DDN/03

Development of Yamuna Circuit (Tiger Falls &Lakhamandal Temple)-

Lot 1

Yes Yes Satisfactory. Operation phase monitoring is being done

Proposed activity has been completed and asset handed over to Village committee

3 UK/IDIPT/DDN/05

Development of Yamuna Circuit (Hanol Mahasu & Tree Samadhi) - Lot 3

Yes Yes Satisfactory No additional corrective measures proposed.

4 UK/IDIPT/DDN/04

Deovan FRH

Yes Yes Satisfactory

Project was executed by the

Forest Dept., under Force Accounts

Works 95% complete

5. UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 (Lot-2) P-1

Development of Adventure Centres in Uttarakhand-Kapkot

Yes Yes Partially Satisfactory

Contractor was directed to improve solid waste and sanitation conditions at site

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 (Lot-2)

P-2 Development of Adventure Centres in Uttarakhand-Tanakpur 5

Yes Yes Satisfactory

5 01 of the locations of the sub project Baturi-Pancheshwat in Champawat was shifted to Tanakpur in

Champawat due to administrative reasons. The addendum to IEE is under process.

29

S.

No


Contract

Documents

EMP being

Implemented

Status of EMP

Implementation

Actions Proposed/


Measures Required


Satisfactory/

Partially

Satisfactory/

Below

Satisfaction)

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 (Lot-2)

P-3Development of Adventure Centres in Uttarakhand-Pauri


Solid waste management to be improved

6 UK/IDIPT/BHT/01

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Naukuchiatal

Yes Yes Satisfactory On an average 10 (labourers have been deployed for the construction activities.

Contractors have provided basic safety equipment like safety Hat, safety Boots & first-aid box at site.

Dust bins provided for collection of solid waste materials. Suggested proper solid waste management

Contractor/PIU has been instructed for the safe disposal of construction waste material.

7 UK/IDIPT/BHT/02

Amelioration of Lake

Naukuchiatal, Naukuchiatal

Yes Yes Satisfactory The project is in O&M phase. , Water quality

monitoring and stocking of beneficial fishes is being regularly done by Dept. of Fisheries Pantnagar University and as per monitoring results, physical condition of Naukuchiyatal lake is improving. Lake is found fit for survival of aquatic

ecosystem.

8 UK/IDIPT/BHT/0 3/ lot- 1/CA/03/2014-15 Trek Trail From Pithoragarh to Chandak, Pithoragarh

Yes Yes Satisfactory Project Completed

Facility constructed under the subproject is being efficiently utilized by the community and is under the process of handing

30

S.

No


Contract

Documents

EMP being

Implemented

Status of EMP

Implementation

Actions Proposed/


Measures Required


Satisfactory/

Partially

Satisfactory/

Below

Satisfaction)

over to the Pithoragarh Nagar Palika. Accordingly, a joint inspection of the site has been completed on 17th June and issuance of handing over letter along with the signing of MoM is under process.

9 UK/IDIPT/BHT03 /LOT- 2/CA/04/2014-15 View Point at Mostamanu

Temple, Pithoragarh

Yes Yes Satisfactory. Project Completed

The activity under this sub project, officially, has already been handed over

to the Temple Committee for taking care of its operation and maintenance in future. The Temple Committee has submitted that all the construction activities are completed and members are satisfied with the quality of the work.

10 UK/IDIPT/BHT03 /LOT-3 Conservation of Pithoragarh Fort Phase-I

Yes Yes Satisfactory On an average 15 labour have been deployed for the construction activities.

Contractors have provided basic safety equipment like safety Hat, safety Boots & first-aid box at site.

Labour are staying in the existing building of the Fort. Contractor directed to improve housekeeping at site.

11 UK/IDIPT/BHT//04- LOT1

(Goods)


Yes Yes Satisfactory On an average 35 local laborers have been deployed for the construction activities. Contractors have provided PPEs, site Safety training is being

31

S.

No


Contract

Documents

EMP being

Implemented

Status of EMP

Implementation

Actions Proposed/


Measures Required


Satisfactory/

Partially

Satisfactory/

Below

Satisfaction)

UK/IDIPT/BHT/04-LOT2

(Works)


imparted to the laborers and supervisors from time to time. Dust bins provided for collection of solid waste materials. Suggested for proper solid waste management

12 UK/IDIPT/KOT/01

Development of Tourism infrastructure for North Corbett Entry Point at

Kotdwar


The contractor has been instructed to carry out preparation for landscaping and plantation works as monsoon season is starting from July. The contractor has been instructed to segregate construction waste scattered around site for reutilization and recycle.

13 UK/IDIPT/KOT/02

Signages works in Uttarakhand State

Not applicable as this is category C project and very minor works of signage erection

Mitigation measures being followed.

Satisfactory The contractor has been advised not to leave signage sites and surroundings untidy and carry out proper compaction and not to create inconvenience to road users during the signage erection works. .

14 UK/IDIPT/KOT/03-Lot-2 Development of Adventure Tourist centre at Tehri

Yes Yes Satisfactory The mitigation measures as per EMP are being followed. The contractor has been instructed to utilize maximum waste material in the filling works and landscaping. - The contractor has been instructed to collect construction waste, packing materials scattered all over site. 3- The contractor has been instructed to dismantle construction camp and leave the site tidy.

32

S.

No


Contract

Documents

EMP being

Implemented

Status of EMP

Implementation

Actions Proposed/


Measures Required


Satisfactory/

Partially

Satisfactory/

Below

Satisfaction)

4- The contractor has been instructed to carry out environmental monitoring for summer season and submit report.

33

Table 7: EMP Monitoring Status Chart

Table 7(i): EMP Monitoring Status Chart- Asan Barrage

IEE/EMP Component

Environmental issues Responsibility

Actions during Reporting Period Compliance

issues

Corrective actions

UK/IDIPT/DDN/01-LOT-1

Location • Siting of facilities • Lack of sufficient Planning • Impact on archaeological remains • Other

PMU & DSC

1 Construction camp established within project site boundary 2. Layout for the project has been developed considering tourism promotion and tourists requirements. IEE and EMP have been prepared and EMP being complied with 3. No site of archaeological remains in the vicinity 4. None

1- No issue

Not Applicable

Pre-construction activities by

the Contractor

1.Construction Camps 2.Defining of construction/work areas on ground for activities within 200m of the boundaries of the protected areas (Asan Barrage) 3. Circulation plan during construction 4. Site clearance activities 5. Drinking water availability 6. Identification of disposal sites 7. Waste mgmt. on site

Contractor & DSC

Pre-construction activities completed before the current reporting period. So this is not applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Construction 1.Improper stockpiling of construction materials 2. Quarry/ Borrow pit operations 3.Stripping, stocking and preservation of top soil 4. Soil erosion 5.Soil & Water pollution due to fuel and lubricants, construction waste 6.Siltation of water bodies 7.Generation of dust 8.Emission of construction vehicles, Equipment & Machinery 9.Noise from construction equipment 10.Material handling at site 11.Disposal of construction waste/debris 12.Safety measures 13. Risks force majeure 14. Malaria risk 15. Construction Staff causing disruption to migratory birds 16.Clearing of construction camps and restoration

Construction activities completed before the current reporting period. So this is not applicable

Not Applicable

34

Operation 1. Environmental conditions 2.Uncontrolled tourism 3. Management of the toilet blocks 4. Adequate drainage 5.Unhygienic condition due to poor maintenance of sanitation facilities and irregular solid waste collection 6. Increased waste loads onto the existing waste disposal facilities

PMU, UTDB

Project has been handed over to GMVN on April 2016. Project activity

completed on March 2016.

Regular maintenance of sanitary facilities

GMVN is being regularly monitored by the DSC and PIU. No. of dustbins have been increased.

35

Table 7(ii): EMP Monitoring Status Chart- Tiger Fall and Lakhamandal

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental issues Responsibility Actions during Reporting Period Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

UK/IDIPT/DDN/03

Location • Siting of facilities • Lack of sufficient Planning • Impact on archaeological

remains • Other

PMU & DSC 1 Construction camp established within project site boundary

2. Layout for the project has been developed considering tourism promotion and tourists requirements. IEE and EMP have been prepared and EMP being complied with 3. No site of archaeological remains in the vicinity 4. None

Not Applicable

Not Applicable


the

Contractor

1.Construction Camps 2. Defining of construction/work areas on ground for activities within 200m of the boundaries of the protected areas (Tiger Fall) 3. Circulation plan during construction 4. Site clearance activities 5. Drinking water availability 6. Identification of disposal sites 7. Waste mgt on site

Contractor & DSC

Pre-construction activities completed before the current reporting period. So this is not applicable

Not Applicable Not Applicable

Construction 1.Improper stockpiling of construction materials 2. Quarry/ Borrow pit operations 3.Stripping, stocking and preservation of top soil 4. Soil erosion 5.Soil & Water pollution due to fuel and lubricants, construction waste 6.Siltation of water bodies 7.Generation of dust 8.Emission of construction vehicles, Equipment & Machinery 9.Noise from construction equipment 10.Material handling at site 11.Disposal of construction waste/debris 12.Safety measures 13. Risks force majeure 14. Malaria risk 15.Clearing of construction

camps and restoration

Construction activities completed before the current reporting period. So this is not applicable

Not Applicable

36

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental issues Responsibility Actions during Reporting Period Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

Operation 1.Environmental conditions 2.Uncontrolled tourism 3. Management of the toilet blocks 4. Adequate drainage 5. Unhygienic condition due to poor maintenance of sanitation facilities and irregular solid waste collection 6. Increased waste loads

onto the existing waste disposal facilities

PMU, UTDB Project handed over to Village committee on April 2016 for Operation and Maintenance.

Project handed over to Temple committee Lakhamandal on dated 13th May ‘2016

In Tiger Falls, after handing over the Project to Village Committee, operation and maintenance of the assets is being done by them successfully

In case of Lakhamandal capacity building of the committee is being continuously done by the NGO and PIU to achieve project objectives

NGO and PIU was instructed to conduct regular sessions on environment awareness and sanitation at Lakhamandal and conduct cleanliness drives at Tiger Falls with the help of community

37

Table 7(iii): EMP Monitoring Status Chart- Deoban Forest Rest House

Sl No

Environmental Issues Mitigation Measures Compliance Issues And Corrective Actions

UK/IDIPT/DDN/04

1. Lack of sufficient planning to assure long term sustainability of the improvements and ensure protection of the assets created of the surroundings

Activities were carried out in accordance with provisions of Forest Management Plan. Construction stage is over. No residual impacts were observed during the site visits.

Nil

2. 2.1 Selection of materials and

construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations

Construction stage is over. No residual impacts were observed during the site visits.

Nil

2.2 Construction Camps – Location, Selection, Design and Layout

Not Applicable Nil

2.3 Circulation plan during construction in the tourist destinations

Not Applicable Nil

2.4 Site clearance activities, including delineation of construction areas

Not Applicable Nil

2.5 Drinking water availability Not Applicable Nil 2.6 Waste disposal Not Applicable Nil 3. 3.1 Improper stockpiling of

construction materials cause impacts starting from obstruction of drainage, disturbance/ safety hazard to tourists, etc.

Not Applicable Nil

3.2 Quarry / Borrow pits Operations Not Applicable Nil 3.3 Arrangement for Construction

Water Not Applicable Nil

3.4 Soil and Water Pollution due to fuel and lubricants, construction waste Water Pollution from Construction Wastes

Not Applicable Nil

3.5 Generation of Dust Not Applicable Nil 3.6 Emission from Construction

Vehicles, Equipment and Machinery

Not Applicable Nil

3.7 Noise from construction activities and equipment

Not Applicable Nil

3.8 Material Handling at Site Not Applicable Nil 3.9 Disposal of Construction Waste

/ Debris / Cut Material Not Applicable Nil

3.10 Safety Measures During Construction

Not Applicable Nil

3.11 Clearing of Construction of Camps & Restoration

Not Applicable Nil

4. 4.1 Unhygienic condition due to poor

maintenance of sanitation facilities and irregular solid waste collection

The Forest department will carry out maintenance of the toilets, and carry out the regular collection of wastes, and will also ensure that sanitation improvements proposed

Project is complete but not considered 100% due to pending submissions from the Forest Dept. During site visit sanitation facilities and waste

--

--

38

do not result in pollution of groundwater. The transfer of waste will also ensure no spillage and all wastes will be transported to a designated solid waste treatment site.

management were found satisfactory. Also values of different environmental parameters monitored were found much below the permissible levels indicating no residual impacts on environment quality.

39

Table 7 (iv): EMP Monitoring Status Chart- Development of Adventure Tourist Centres in Uttarakhand

IEE/EMP

Compone

nt

Environmental issues Responsibi

lity Actions during Reporting Period

Complianc

e issues

Correctiv

e actions

UK/IDIPT/DDN/06 Lot 2 P-1, P-26 and P-3

Location 1. Lack of sufficient planning to assure long term sustainability of the improvements and ensure protection of the assets created and the architectural /archaeological character of the surroundings

PMU & DSC

Location planned strategically in due consultation with stakeholders and proper technical assessment by Experts.7

Not Applicable

No action is needed as this stage for the sub

project is over.

Pre-construction activities by the Contractor

1. Layout of components to avoid impacts on the aesthetics of the site 2. Increased storm water runoff from alterations of the site’s natural drainage patterns due to landscaping, excavation works in the periphery of construction of parking lots, and addition of paved surfaces. 3. Selection of materials and construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations 4. Integration of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs in design of subproject component

Contractor & DSC

1. Lay out done in consideration of

aesthetics of site.

2. Components have been planned

as per sites natural drainage

patterns.

3. Project is very small in nature and

emphasis is given to local

material and craftsmanship.

4. Energy efficiency shall be

ensured through purchase of

energy efficient electric fixtures

and water saving plumbing

measures, use of local adaptable

and less water requiring plants in

landscaping.

5. Site work and construction of

RCC and RR retaining wall on

work on under progress at

Kapkot.

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Construction

1. Construction Camps 2.Site clearance activities, including delineation of construction areas 3.Drinking water availability 4. Identification of disposal sites 5. Waste Disposal 6. Improper stockpiling 7.Quarry/ Borrow pit operations 8. Soil erosion 9. Soil & Water pollution due to

Contractor & DSC

1- No construction camps at all 03 sites Kapkot, Tanakpur and Pauri. Labour resides in existing residence on rent. Mostly local labour.

Submission of Environmental

monitoring report for post monsoon

Usage of PPEs at site

The contractor has been instructed

to submit environmental monitoring report

The contractor has been

2- The stage of site clearance and delineation of construction areas is over.

3- Drinking Water Arrangements:

Kapkot

Potable water supplied by contractor

6 01 of the locations of the sub project Bautadi in Champawat was shifted to Tanakpur in Champawat due to

administrative reasons. The addendum to IEE is under process.

7 Owing to administrative reasons, 01 of the proposed location for the sub-project Baturi-Pancheshwar was

shifted to Tanakpur-Champawat. DM’s request letter attached Annexure 6.

40

IEE/EMP

Compone

nt



Complianc

e issues

Correctiv

e actions

fuel/lubricants 10. Siltation of water bodies 11. Generation of dust 12.Emission from constn

vehicles 13.Noise from constn equipment 14. Material handling at site 15.Disposal of constn waste/debris 16. Safety measures 17. Clearing of Construction of Camps and Restoration

to laborers at Kapkot

Tanakpur

Existing boring water used by laborer for drinking purpose at Tanakpur

Pauri

Potable Drinking water is being made available at construction site by existing jal sansthan supply.

advised to enforce usage of PPEs at site without fail.

4 Identification of disposal sites Kapkot Kapkot waste stored for land filling Tanakpur In Tanakpur, so far waste is being utilized for filling at site only Pauri Waste disposal in Pauri is done at the designated site in consultation with DSC Engineer and Pauri Nagar Palika. 5. Waste Disposal Not much domestic waste is generated at sites At kapkot waste being disposed in municipality dusbins Waste is stored in dustbins at site and disposed in municipality dustbins at Tanakpur. Waste is stored in dustbins at site and disposed in municipality dustbins at Pauri 6- Stockpiling of construction material is demarcated but is not covered in Tanakpur.

In Pauri, since land constraint is there, material is brought as per demand and not much is stocked.

7-There has been no requirement for borrow pit operations. The sand is being procured from licensed quarries in both sites. There has been no requirement for sub grade in the reporting period. 8- At Kapkot to check soil erosion, retaining wall is under construction No issue of soil erosion at Tanakpur

41

IEE/EMP

Compone

nt



Complianc

e issues

Correctiv

e actions

site since it is plain land. At Pauri existing DTDO’s office is being renovated, so no issue of soil erosion 9- The fuel and lubricants are being stored in drums and construction machinery is not maintained at site. The fuel is purchased on need basis Hence, there are no chances of water and soil pollution. 10- No water bodies are nearby areas of Kapkot This is not applicable to Tanakpur site, as river is not within impact zone. There is a seasonal (monsoon) water body close to sub project site in Pauri, but works are mainly of renovation. so there is no issue of siltation 11- Contractor has taken a rented room to keep the materials properly at Kapkot. The dust generation due to material handling is being controlled through water sprinkling and covering the stockpiles of raw material in Tanankpur. In Pauri, raw material is brought as per demand and stored in existing building. 12- At Kapkot no heavy machinery is available at this stage. At Tanakpur, the construction vehicle usage at site is not needed except for bringing construction materials at site. The frequency of trucks bringing construction materials is once or twice a week. The other source is emissions from mini Generator set operated intermittently for casting only. At Pauri, there is no generator. The emissions on account of vehicle movement are insignificant. 13- The only noise generated at site is from portable concrete mixer. It is operated intermittently. 14- At kapkot material handling is satisfactory. The material handling at site has not been satisfactory in Tanakpur during reporting period, as workers were not seen using personal protective equipment (PPEs) such as hand gloves, boots, helmets, etc. while handling the

42

IEE/EMP

Compone

nt



Complianc

e issues

Correctiv

e actions

construction materials. At Pauri, usage is satisfactory.

15- Disposal of construction waste/debris- discussed under sl.no.4 above.

16- Works in the reporting period at kapkot were minor pertaining only to site clearance and construction of retaining wall. Usage of PPEs at tanakpur and Pauri is partially satisfactory. 17-Not applicable.

Operation 1Environmental conditions 2.Uncontrolled tourism 3. Management of the toilet blocks 4. Adequate drainage 5. Unhygienic condition due to poor maintenance of sanitation facilities and irregular solid waste collection 6. Increased waste loads onto the existing waste disposal facilities

PMU, UTDB

1-The sub project has not reached Operation phase, so this is not applicable.

Not Applicable

Not applicable

43

Table 7 (v): EMP Monitoring Status Chart- Development of Tourism Infrastructure for North Corbett Entry Point at Kotdwara

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental

issues Responsibility

Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

UK/IDIPT/KOT/01

Location 1. Lack of sufficient planning to assure long term sustainability of the improvements and ensure protection of the assets created and the architectural /archaeological character of the surroundings

PMU & DSC Not Applicable as this environmental issue pertains to pre construction stage and this stage of sub project is over.

1- No issue

No action is needed as this stage for the sub project is over.

Pre-construction

activities by the Contractor

1. Layout of components to avoid impacts on the aesthetics of the site 2. Increased storm water runoff from alterations of the site’s natural drainage patterns due to landscaping, excavation works in the periphery of construction of parking lots, and addition of paved surfaces. 3. Selection of materials and construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations 4. Integration of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs in design of subproject component

Contractor & DSC 1-Not Applicable as this environmental issue pertains to pre construction stage

and this stage of sub project is over.


2-Not Applicable as this environmental issue pertains to pre construction stage and this stage of sub project is over.

3-Not Applicable as this environmental issue pertains to pre construction stage and this stage of sub project is over.

4-Not Applicable as

this environmental issue pertains to pre construction stage and this stage of sub project is over.

44

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

Construction 1. Construction Camps 2.Site clearance activities, including delineation of construction areas 3.Drinking water availability 4. Identification of disposal sites 5. Waste Disposal 6. Improper stockpiling 7.Quarry/ Borrow pit operations 8. Soil erosion 9. Soil & Water pollution due to fuel/lubricants 10. Siltation of water bodies 11. Generation of dust 12.Emission from constn vehicles 13.Noise from constn equipment 14. Material handling at site 15.Disposal of constn waste/debris 16. Safety

Contractor & DSC 1-The project is in finishing stage. The construction camp has been demolished. At the site landscaping and tree plantation works are to be taken up in the coming monsoon season. The contractor has been instructed to prepare for plantation works.

1-Usage of PPEs during material handling

2 Environmental monitoring report submission for summer season.

3-Usage of PPEs at site .

4-Usage of discarded construction waste for fill

works.

5- Stabilization of side slopes at water bodies

6- Demarcation

of excavated areas with caution tapes.

1- The contractor has been instructed to enforce usage of PPEs.

2 The contractor has been instructed to carry out

environmental monitoring as early as possible for summer season.

3- Contractor has been instructed to submit details

for side slopes protection at water bodies.

4- The contractor has been instructed to utilize remaining

2- The stage of site clearance and delineation of construction areas is over during pre construction phase so this is not applicable

3- Potable Drinking water is being made available at construction site by the contractor for all the construction work force.

45

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

measures 17. Clearing of Construction of Camps and Restoration

4- The contractor was instructed to identify location for waste disposal. It has been decided later that construction waste and debris will be utilised for filling works at the Gas Godown, water body under development. Most of the construction waste has already been utilized in filling. Remaining waste has been stored at an isolated location at site and will be utilised in fill works at water bodies.

construction waste in fill works.

5- The contractor has been instructed to put caution tape around all excavated areas at site.

5- Waste disposal has been explained at sl.no.4 6-Stockpiling of construction material is not much now because project is in finishing

stage. The construction material stockpiling is now under the semi finished buildings of

subproject.

7-There has been no requirement for borrow pit operations. The sand is being procured from licensed quarries. There has been no requirement for sub grade in the reporting period. 8- The soil erosion issue may come up at water body location as this is under development.

46

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

The contractor has been advised to stabilize the side slopes with proper compaction and shrubs plantation. 9- The fuel and lubricants are being stored in drums and construction machinery is not maintained at site. The fuel is purchased on need basis from the petrol pumps at Kotdwara. Hence, there are no chances of water and soil pollution. 10- There is no water body close to sub project site, so there is no issue of siltation. This environmental issue is not applicable to Kotdwara site. 11- The dust generation due to material handling is being controlled through water sprinkling and storing materials in the semi finished building of the sub project. Since site is ready for landscaping so dust generation chances are minimum. 12-The construction vehicle usage at site is not needed except for bringing construction materials at site. Most of construction materials and finished items such as tiles, Granite slabs, cement bags, etc. have already been transported to the site. The other

47

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

source is emissions from DG set operated intermittently for concrete mixer. This DG set is maintained properly. The emissions on account of vehicle movement are insignificant. 13- The only noise generated at site is from portable concrete mixer. It is operated intermittently. The construction workers were not seen using personal protective equipment (PPEs). The construction activities are not taken up during night time. 14- The material handling at site has not been satisfactory, during reporting period, as workers not seen are using personal protective equipment (PPEs) such as hand gloves, boots, helmets, etc. while handling the construction materials. 15- Disposal of construction waste/debris- discussed under sl.no.4 above. 16- The safety measures such as usage of PPEs, fencingof excavated sites for water bodies, and trenches for laying of electrical cables with caution tapes,

48

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

etc. have not been seen at sites during various visits.

17- The construction camp has been demolished and the site is restored to original form.

Operation 1Environmental conditions 2.Uncontrolled tourism 3. Management of the toilet blocks 4. Adequate drainage 5. Unhygienic condition due to poor maintenance of sanitation facilities and irregular solid waste collection 6. Increased waste loads onto the existing waste disposal facilities

PMU, UTDB 1-The sub project has not reached

Operation phase, so this is not applicable.

Not Applicable Not applicable

49

Table 7(vi): EMP Monitoring Status Chart- Signages works in Uttarakhand State

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

UK/IDIPT/KOT/02- Signage Works in Uttarakhand

Location 1. Siting of facilities 2 Lack of sufficient planning 3.Impact on archaeological remains 4. Other

PMU & Line Agency

1-The locations have been finalised by the signage expert in consultation with tourism department and other relevant stakeholders. This has been done during DPR preparation. So this is not applicable.

Not Applicable as this stage in the sub project is over.

Not Applicable

2- The planning for locations of various signage works has been done after due consideration of tourism potential in the state in the DPR phase. This is not applicable for reporting period.

3- No impacts on archeological remains has been identified so far.

4- No other unforeseen issue related to signage has been encountered so far.

Design & pre construction

impacts

1. Impact on sensitive areas 2. Slope stability related issues 3. Increased storm water runoff 4. Impact on ground water quality 5. Impact on aesthetic appeal 6. Integration of energy

DSC & PIU 1- This stage in the sub project is over, however, no impact on sensitive areas, as all signage works are within the existing RoW of NH/SH/MDR. This is a pre construction environmental issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period.

Not Applicable as this stage is over for the sub project.

Not Applicable

2- The signages works require very less area (<5 m2) for foundation so no

50

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

conservation slope stability related issue faced in the sub project. This is a pre construction environmental issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period. 3- No issue related to storm water runoff in signage works as these have been planned either in already existing RoW of Roads or fully developed land owned by the Government in urban areas of Uttarakhand state. This is a pre construction environmental issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period. 4- No impact on ground water quality due to erection of tourism signages. This is a pre construction environmental issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period. 5-The impacts on aesthetic appeal were not identified during design and pre construction issue. This is a pre construction environmental issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period. 6- The signage works are along the roads and no specific lighting/ electrification around these has been planned. So

51

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

this is not applicable. This is a pre construction environmental issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period.

Pre-construction


1.Construction Camps 2. Defining of construction/work areas on ground for activities within 200m of the boundaries of the protected areas 3. Circulation plan during construction 4. Site clearance activities 5. Drinking water availability 6. Identification of disposal sites 7. Waste management on subproject sites

Contractor & DSC 1-The signage works do not require construction camp establishment so this is not applicable.

Not applicable as this stage is over for the sub project.

Not Applicable

2- The signage locations are well within the existing RoW of roads and these have been planned sufficiently away >200m from the archaeological sites. 3- No specific circulation plan required for signage construction works. 4- Site clearance activities not needed as the works are within the existing RoW and the works are very small in nature. 5- The construction crew moves with all construction materials and signage components and stays in hotels in urban areas so drinking water availability is not an issue. 6-The waste generation at individual sites is insignificant as small works for foundation of signage are carried out. So there is no issue of waste disposal. 7- This is not applicable as team

52

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

working on signage works is not leaving any waste at signage site.

Construction impacts

1. Improper stockpiling 2.Quarry/ Borrow pit operations 3.Stripping, stocking & preservation of top soil 4.Soil erosion 5. Water pollution due to fuel/lubricants 6. Siltation of water bodies 7. Generation of dust 8.Emission from construction vehicles 9. Noise from constn equipment 10. Material handling at site 11. Disposal of constn waste/debris 12. Safety measures 13. Risks force majeure 14. Malaria risk 15. Chance archaeological finds 16.Religious structures 17. Construction Staff causing disruption to migratory birds

Contractor 1- Stockpiling of construction materials is not

required in signage works.

1- At some locations where signage works

have been completed, some left over construction material was

seen and at some locations compaction around foundation and on side slopes of road was not done properly. This may result in soil erosion.

1- The contractor has been

instructed to compact the base around foundation properly and

not to leave any discarded materials or excavated earth.

2- The signage works are small in nature and do not require quarry and

borrow pit operations.

3- The signage works are being taken up in an area (<5 m2) within the RoW of road, so top soil generation is insignificant. Any small quantity generated is used in filling works after

completion of foundation works.

4-No soil erosion issue has been there till now in the erection of signages.

5- There is no

storage of fuel and lubricant at location of signage works. The construction crew is moving in a truck so issue of water and soil pollution due to fuel and lubricants is not there.

6- No issue of siltation into water

bodies as works at individual sites are very small in nature.

53

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

7-Dust generation issue is not there. While doing foundation works material handling is manual by the workers.

8-The only construction vehicle used is truck carrying cement, sand and sigange foundation components of steel. Hence no issue of emissions from construction vehicle. The truck being used has pollution under control certificate.

9-No noise generation issue as no construction equipment are being used. The construction material is mixed manually by the construction crew.

10-The material handling at signage site is proper. The construction crew uses gloves, shoes, etc. while handling materials at site.

11- There is no generation of construction waste/debris at individual sites of signanges. No specific plan is required for disposal of construction waste/debris. At some sites, discarded

54

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

construction waste was seen.

12-The construction crew is using PPE while working at sites. This has been observed during site visits.

13- No risk force Majeure during reporting period.

14-No malarial risks identified as there is no impoundment of water at the individual sites of

signage works. These being within RoW of roads, which is well drained.

15-No chance finds encountered during reporting period. Hence no action required.

16-No impacts on religious structures, during the reporting

period, as signage works locations are away from the religious structures. The sub project will have positive impact as it will ease accessibility to pilgrims to the locations of religious structures.

17-The construction

crew is not staying at site, so no risk to migratory birds.

55

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

O & M impacts 1. Environmental conditions 2.Uncontrolled tourism 3. Management of the toilet blocks 4. Adequate drainage 5. Unhygienic condition due to poor maintenance of sanitation facilities and irregular solid waste collection 6. Increased waste loads onto the existing waste disposal facilities

PMU, Contractor & DSC

The sub project has not reached operation stage as signage works are in progress so this is not applicable.

Not applicable Not Applicable

56

Table 7(vii): EMP Monitoring Status Chart- Development of Adventure Tourist Centre at Tehri

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

UK/IDIPT/KOT/03-Lot-2

Location impacts

1. Lack of sufficient planning to assure long term sustainability of the improvements and ensure protection of the assets created and the architectural /archaeological character of the surroundings.

PMU & Line Agency

1-No actions as the location of sub project finalized considering all aspects of long term sustainability and protection of assets. This is a pre construction environmental

issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period.

No issue related to location finalisation. This stage in the sub project is over, so not applicable.

None as this stage is over.

Design & pre construction

impacts

1. Layout of components to avoid impacts on the aesthetics of the site 2. Increased storm water runoff from alterations of the site’s natural drainage patterns due to landscaping, excavation works in the periphery of construction of parking lots, and addition of paved surfaces. 3. Selection of materials and construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations 4. Integration of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs in design of subproject

DSC & PIU 1- No action as layout of sub project finalized during early stage of sub project implementation. This is a pre construction environmental issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period.

This stage of the project is over, so this is not applicable

Not Applicable

2- No such issue encountered during pre construction stage as sub project site is on slope having quick drainage to Tehri lake. This is a pre construction environmental issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period. 3- The selection of materials and construction technologies already finalized during pre construction stage, so no action required during reporting period.

57

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

component 5. Slope Stability related issues

4- The energy efficiency and energy conservation measures considered during project design, so no action required during reporting period as this a design phase issue. Lighting system of building utilizes LED lights. 5- The necessary slope protection works through retaining wall have been taken up as part of sub project component in the pre- construction phase. The retaining wall works have been completed, so no action during reporting period.

Pre-construction


1. Construction Camps 2.Site clearance activities, including delineation of construction areas 3.Circulation plan during construction in the tourist destinations 4.Drinking water availability

Contractor & DSC 1-Construction camp has been established near sub project site. The DSC has monitored sanitation, drinking water facilities, etc. at the construction camp. Now the subproject

construction works have been completed, the construction camp is empty. This is a pre construction environmental issue, hence not applicable for the reporting period.

No issues as this stage of project is over. Hence not applicable.

Not Applicable

2- Site clearance activities over during

pre construction stage, hence this is not applicable for the reporting period.

58

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

3- The construction of sub project did not have any impact on movement tourists during the reporting period.

4-The drinking water

has been made available to the construction work force during the reporting period. The drinking water for the camp is sourced through water tankers. This is being monitored by the DSC team during the reporting period.


1. Waste Disposal 2. Improper stockpiling 3.Quarry/ Borrow pit operations 4. Soil erosion 5. Soil & Water pollution due to fuel/lubricants 6. Siltation of water bodies 7. Generation of dust 8.Emission from construction vehicles 9.Noise from construction equipment 10. Material handling at site 11.Disposal of construction waste/debris 12. Safety measures 13. Clearing of Construction of Camps and Restoration

Contractor 1-Since the project is at completion stage, most of the construction waste has already been utilized in filling works. During the site visits, waste material in the form of Scattered shuttering material, cement bags, packing polythene wastes, leftover sand and tiles were seen.

1- Use of personal protective equipment to be enforced to the entire construction crew.

2- The

contractor is in the process of dismantling of construction. The camp site to be reinstated to original form.

3- Segregation of scattered construction waste and

identification of waste disposal site.

4- Completion of environmental monitoring for summer

1- The contractor has been advised to enforce usage of PPEs for the entire work force in maintenance works being taken up.

2- The contractor has been advised to dismantle the remaining portion of camp and not to leave any construction camp demolition waste at site. The camp site has to be left in its original form. 3- The

2- Now the construction works are complete so no stockpiling of construction

materials is required.

3- During the construction phase, contractor was obtaining sand for construction works from the licensed

59

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

quarries only. Borrow area operations were not required to be operated.

season. contractor has been advised to collect and segregate construction waste such as shuttering materials, steel bars, cement bags, etc. This waste needs to be collected and disposed off to leave the site surroundings tidy. 4- The contractor has been advised to submit the monitoring report for summer season.

4- In order to avoid soil erosion

protection works in the form retaining wall have been taken up in the beginning phase of the project. The retaining wall construction works have been completed before this reporting period. There has been no issue of soil erosion during the reporting period.

5- The fuel for construction works is not stored at site. It is purchased on need basis from the petrol pumps. Now, there is no requirement of storage of lubricants as construction works for the project are over. Hence no issue of soil and water pollution of Tehri Lake on account of fuel and lubricants.

6- The construction material storage

requirements in the project are over as works have been completed. Now there are no excavation works requirements also. Hence there is no issue of siltation in

60

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

Tehri Lake on account project activities.

7-The generation of dust has been controlled through water sprinkling

during the reporting period. The storage of cement in shed and storage of construction materials (prone to airborne due to winds) for the maintenance of building was observed in inside one portion of building completed. The dust generation is minimal as finishing works of project are also completed.

8- The emissions from construction vehicles were controlled through regular maintenance during the reporting period. Now construction materials transportation to site is not required. Hence vehicular emissions are not there on account of construction

activities.

9-Now since construction works for the subproject are completed, so there is no issue of noise generation from the project.

61

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

10-The material handling at site is is not required except for some minor repairs of subproject project building completed. Although, the contractor has procured personal protective equipment such as helmets, Gloves, safety shoes, etc. some of the construction

workers were seen not using these PPEs during the reporting period.

11- Disposal of construction waste/Debris- This has already been discussed under sl.no.1

12- The safety measures such as usage of PPEs, fencing of excavated sites with tapes, and proper storage of steel bars, etc. has been observed partially satisfactory during the reporting period. The site engineers of DSC although regularly instruct for this. 13- The sub project construction works are completed and

almost all workers are also demobilised, so contractor has dismantled part construction camp. The contractor needs to demolish

62

IEE/EMP

Component

Environmental


Actions during

Reporting Period

Compliance

issues

Corrective

actions

the remaining portion of construction camp and reinstate the construction camp to original form. The DSC environmental expert has instructed to identify site for camp demolition waste and to reinstate camp site to original form. This activity will be monitored in the next few months

after the reporting period.

O & M impacts 1. Environmental conditions 2. Uncontrolled tourism 3. Management of the toilet blocks 4. Adequate drainage 5. Unhygienic condition due to poor maintenance of sanitation facilities and irregular solid waste collection 6. Increased waste loads onto the existing waste disposal facilities 7. Operation of Motor boats


The sub project construction works are not yet completed, hence this is not applicable.


63

Table 7(viii): EMP Monitoring Status Chart - Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay

IEE/EMP Components

Environmental Issues Responsibility Action during Reporting period

Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

UK/IDIPT/BHT/01 Location impacts

Lack of sufficient planning to assure long term sustainability of the improvements and ensure protection of the assets created and the architectural character of the surroundings.

PMU & Line Agency

The project site is existing Tourist

Rest House

No issue Not applicabl

e

Design & pre construction impacts

1. Increased storm water runoff from alterations of the site‘s natural drainage patterns due to additional structures in TRH complex and landscaping works in the area and on lake edge.

DSC & PIU Impacts considered and

measures integrated in

design

No issue Not applicabl

e

2. Selection of materials and construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations 3. Integration of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs in design of subproject components

Pre-construction activities by the contractor

1. Circulation plan during construction in the tourist destinations

Contractor & DSC

Circulation plan made

No issue

2. Site clearance activities, including delineation of construction areas

Site clearance done by contractor

3. Drinking water availability and water arrangement

Drinking water is available at site 500m away (Hand Pump) is being used by the labour

4. Identification of sites for disposal of construction and demolition work Designated site for

waste Disposal by the local municipality is being used for dumping of the domestic waste


1. Improper stockpiling of construction materials cause impacts starting

Contractor Construction Material Properly stockpiled and

No issue

I

64

IEE/EMP Components


Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

from obstruction of drainage, disturbance/ safety hazard to tourists, etc.

brought as per demand

2. Stripping, stocking and preservation of top soil

Demolished waste and excavated material from working site and use/ disposal of the same as per Mitigation measures in EMP

No issue

3. Soil Erosion 3. Construction is being done in place of existing structures as per EMP there is no issue of soil erosion.

No issue

4. Soil and Water Pollution due to fuel and lubricants, construction waste

4. Since no major equipment is being used at site storage is not required. Fuel is being carried as per requirement

No issue

5. Siltation of water bodies due to spillage of construction and demolition wastes

5. Construction waste is being used for ground filling and remaining is being disposed as per EMP

No issue

6. Generation of Dust 6. Water sprinkling is being done regularly at construction site and construction material is being carried by covered truck.

No issue

7.Emission from construction vehicles, equipment and machinery

7. Only Vibrators and one concrete mixer is being used. No Major vehicles / equipments are present at site.

No issue

8. Noise from construction equipment

8. Only Vibrators and one concrete mixer is being used. No Major

No issue

I

65

IEE/EMP Components


Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

vehicles / equipments are present at site.

9. Material Handling at Site 9.Proper Material handling is being done for storage and disposal as per EMP

No issue

10. Disposal of Construction Waste/ Debris

10. Demolished waste and excavated material are stocked at working site. There is need to dispose of this material

Proper Disposal of demolition waste

Contractor/PIU have been instructed for the same

11. Safety Measures During Construction

11. Using Personal Protective Equipment like helmets and shoes are being used by workers. Warning tape has been provided around the Construction site

11. Other cautionary signage need to be provide

11. Contractor has been instructed to provide other cautionary signage at Construction Sites

12. Risk caused by Force Majeure

12. NA

13. Malaria Risk 13. Precaution being taken as per EMP

No issue

O&M impacts 1.Environmental Conditions


Not Yet Started

2. Adequate drainage of site area 3. Increased waste loads onto the existing waste disposal facilities (that are non conformant to the Government requirements for SWM)

I

66

Table 7(ix): EMP Monitoring Status Chart - Amelioration of Lake Naukuchiatal

IEE/EMP Compon

ents

Environmental Issues Responsibility

Action during Reporting period

Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

UK/IDIPT/BHT/02 Location impacts

1. Lack of sufficient planning to assure long term sustainability of the improvements and ensure protection of the assets created and the architectural character of the surroundings.

PMU & Line Agency

The project scope involves aeration and bio-manipulation of the lake, for which locations for compressor have been chosen after technical examination and feasibility assessment.

No issue Not applicable

2.Impact on archaeological remains No Archeological

remains exist at the site Design & pre construction impacts

1. Slope stability related issues

DSC & PIU Impacts considered and measures integrated in the design

No issue as this stage is over

Not applicable

2. Increased storm water runoff from alterations of the site‘s natural drainage patterns due to excavation works in the periphery of the lake and addition of paved surfaces. 3. Selection of materials and construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations 4. Integration of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs in design of subproject components



Contractor & DSC

No issue as this stage is over

Not applicable

1. Site clearance activities, including delineation of construction areas 2. Drinking water availability and water arrangement 3. Identification of disposal sites


1. Improper stockpiling of construction materials cause impacts starting from obstruction of drainage, disturbance/ safety hazard to tourists, etc.

Contractor No issue, since construction activity completed

Not applicable

2. Soil Erosion

67

IEE/EMP Compon

ents



Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

3. Soil and Water Pollution due to fuel and lubricants, construction waste 4. Siltation of water bodies due to spillage of construction wastes 5. Generation of Dust 6. Emission from Construction Vehicles, Equipment and Machinery 7. Noise from construction Equipments 8. Material Handling at Site

9. Impacts due to operation of construction equipment 10. Disposal of Construction Waste/ Debris / Cut Material/weeds 11. Safety Measures During Construction 12. Risk caused by Force Majeure 13. Malaria Risk

O & M impacts

Environmental Conditions


The Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Temperature, pH TDS Transparency are being recorded regularly by the contractor as well as by the GB Pant Univ. The present Dissolved oxygen level is 0.34 to 8.55 mg/l on surface while, Transparency level ranged between 1.24 to 1.60 meter. Similarly, temperature varied between 23.0 oC to 23.6oC. The pH value was 7.60 to 8.65. The environmental condition is improving gradually. Fingerlings of mahsheer, Rohu, catla & silver carp are being regularly introduced in the lake for biomanipulation.

Algal growth in lake. Mortality of stocked fingerlings

Manual cleaning process should be regularly carried out. Contractor. Mortality needs to be checked.

Management of the toilet blocks

No toilet block available. One Toilet need to be provide at each compressor

PIU need to take action for the construction of the toilet

68

IEE/EMP Compon

ents



Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

house after discussion with LDA

Unhygenic condition due to poor maintenance of sanitation facilities and irregular solid waste collection

No major sanitation facility required.

One Toilet need to be provide at each compressor house Litter bin needs to be provided

Contractor has been instructed to provide One Toilet and Litter bin at each compressor house

Increased waste loads onto the existing waste disposal facilities

Insignificant waste load envisaged due to only one employee required for operation at a time on each pump house.

No issue

69

Table 7(x): EMP Monitoring Status Chart - Trek Trail from Pithoragarh to Chandak, Pithoragarh

IEE/EMP Components

Environmental Issues

Responsibility Action during

Reporting period Compliance

Issues Corrective Measures

UK/IDIPT/BHT/03 - Lot 1

Location impacts


PMU & Line Agency Not applicable No issue as this stage is

over

Not applicable


1. Increased storm water runoff from alterations of the site‘s natural drainage patterns due to additional structures and landscaping works in the area.

DSC & PIU Not applicable No issue as this stage is

over

Not applicable

2. Selection of materials and construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations 3. Integration of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs in design of subproject components 4. Slope stability related issues 5. In areas of shallow water table, ensure that the septic tanks developed, do not impact the ground water quality


1. Circulation plan during construction in the

Contractor & DSC Not applicable No issue as this stage is

over

Not applicable

70

IEE/EMP Components





the contractor

tourist destinations 2. Site clearance activities, including delineation of construction areas

Not applicable

3. Drinking water availability and water arrangement

Not applicable

4. Identification of sites for disposal of construction and demolition work

Not applicable



Contractor Not applicable No issue as this stage is

over

2. Soil Erosion 3. Soil and Water Pollution due to fuel and lubricants, construction waste 4. Siltation of water bodies due to spillage of construction and demolition wastes

5. Generation of Dust

6. Emission from construction vehicles, equipment and machinery


8. Material Handling at Site 9. Disposal of Construction Waste/ Debris / Cut Material 11.Safety Not applicable

71

IEE/EMP Components





Measures During Construction 12. Risk caused by Force Majeure 13. Malaria Risk

O & M impacts

1. Environmental Conditions


Precaution being taken as per the EMP

No issue

2. Adequate drainage of site area

Precaution has been taken during construction.

No issue

3. Increased waste loads onto the existing waste disposal facilities (that are non-conformant to the Government requirements for SWM)

Increased waste loads not envisaged. Dustbin along the trek trail and proper disposal of solid waste have been suggested

Proper disposal of solid waste

Waste bin needs to

be provided along the trek trail

72

Table 7(xi): EMP Monitoring Status Chart - View Point at Mostamanu Temple, Pithoragarh

IEE/EMP Components


Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions


Location impacts


PMU & Line Agency

Not applicable No issue as this stage is

over

Not applicable



DSC & PIU Not applicable No issue as this stage is

over

Not applicable

2. Selection of materials and construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations 3. Integration of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs in design of subproject components 4. Slope stability related issues 5. In areas of shallow water table, ensure that the septic tanks developed, do not impact the ground water quality



Contractor & DSC

Not applicable No issue as this stage is

over

Not applicable

2. Site clearance activities, including delineation of construction areas 3. Drinking water availability and water arrangement 4. Identification of sites for disposal of construction and demolition work



Contractor No issue as this stage

is over

2. Stripping, stocking and preservation of top soil

3. Soil Erosion 4. Soil and Water Pollution due to fuel and lubricants,

73

IEE/EMP Components


Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

construction waste 5. Siltation of water bodies due to spillage of construction and demolition wastes

6. Generation of Dust 7. Emission from construction vehicles, equipment and machinery


9. Material Handling at Site 10. Disposal of Construction Waste/ Debris / Cut Material

11.Safety Measures During Construction

12. Risk caused by Force Majeure

13. Malaria Risk O & M impacts

1. Environmental Conditions PMU and Temple Committee

Precaution being taken as per the EMP

No issue

2. Increased waste loads onto the existing waste disposal facilities

Regular Solid waste generation is very less.

However on local

festival, solid waste

increase, for which extra bins need to be provided.

Extra Waste bin needs to

be provided in

temple compound.

3. Unhygienic condition due to poor maintenance of sanitation facilities and irregular solid waste collection

Dustbin have been suggested and management committee members has been oriented for proper solid waste management

Proper disposal of solid waste

Collected west in

Dust bin needs to

be transported

at Municipal dumping

site regularly

74

Table 7(xii): EMP Monitoring Status Chart - Conservation of Pithoragarh Fort, Pithoragarh

IEE/EMP Components


Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions


Location impacts

1. Lack of sufficient planning to assure long term sustainability of the improvements and ensure protection of the assets

created and the architectural character of the surroundings.

PMU & Line Agency

The project site is existing at Pithoragarh Fort Complex

No issue

Not applicable



DSC & PIU Impacts considered and measures integrated in the design

No issue

Not applicable

2.Selection of materials and construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations

3.Integration of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs in design of subproject components


1.Circulation plan during construction in the tourist Destinations

Contractor & DSC

Circulation plan made No issue

Not applicable

2.Site clearance activities, including delineation of construction areas

Site clearance done by contractor

3.Drinking water availability and water arrangement

Municipal water is being used by the labour

4.Identification of sites for disposal of construction and demolition waste

Construction/demolition waste is being disposed at designated site identified by PIU


1.Improper stockpiling of construction materials cause impacts starting from obstruction of drainage, disturbance/ safety hazard

to tourists, etc.

Contractor 1. Construction Material Properly stockpiled.

No issue

2.Stripping, stocking and preservation of top soil

2.Demolished waste and excavated material from working site and use / disposal of the same as per Mitigation measures in EMP

No issue

3.Soil Erosion 3.Construction is being done in place of existing

No issue

75

IEE/EMP Components


Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

structures as per EMP

4.Soil and Water Pollution due to fuel and lubricants, construction waste

4. Since no major equipment is being used at site storage of Fuel is not required. Fuel is being carried as per requirement

Testing of water quality

Contractor has been instructed to get regular testing of air water and noise as per EMP

5.Generation of Dust 5. Water sprinkling is being done regularly at construction sites and construction material is being carried by covered truck.

Testing of ambient air quality

6.Emission from

construction vehicles, equipment and machinery

6. No major equipment/ machinery is being used at site .

Testing of ambient air quality

7.Noise from construction equipment

7. No Major equipments/ machinery are being used at site no noised generation is envisaged.

Testing of ambient noise quality

8.Material Handling at Site 8.Proper Material handling is being done for storage and disposal as per EMP

No issue

9.Disposal of Construction Waste/ Debris / Cut

Material

9. Demolished waste and excavated material from working site and use / disposal of the same as per Mitigation measures in EMP

No issue

10.Safety Measures During Construction

10. Using Personal Protective Equipment like helmets and gum boot are being used by workers

No issue

11.Risk caused by Force Majeure

11.NA

12.Malaria Risk 12. Precaution being taken as per EMP

No issue

O & M impacts

1.Environmental Conditions PMU, Contractor & DSC

Not yet started

2.Adequate drainage of site area

76

Table 7(xiii): EMP Monitoring Status Chart – Development of Adventure Centre at Baur Jalashay

IEE/EMP Components


Responsibility Action during Reporting period

Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

UK/IDIPT/BHT/04-LOT-2 (Works)

Location impacts 1. Siting of facilities PMU & DSC Integrated in design, all care has been taken to plan activities in accordance with Irrigation Dept. norms.

No Issue NA 2. Lack of sufficient

Planning 3. Lay out of

Components to avoid impacts in site aesthetics

4. Slope stability related issues

4.Slope stability issue is not much as site is plain land

No Issue NA

5. Increased storm water runoff

5. The storm water runoff from the project is diverted to the reservoir through drainage system of project.

No Issue NA



DSC & PIU Pre No issue Not applicable

2.Selection of materials and construction technologies, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations 3.Integration of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs in design of subproject components


1. Construction Camps

Pre-construction activities are over. Construction camps are established in vacant space near the site and provided with sanitation and potable drinking water through the existing bore well/ tube well. Waste material due to site clearance and construction activity was stored and kept aside for utilization in later phase of

No Issue NA

2. Sanitation facilities at camps

3. Circulation plan during construction

4. Site clearance activities

5. Drinking water availability

6. Identification of disposal sites

7. Waste mgt on site

77

IEE/EMP Components



Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

construction. Construction impacts

1. Improper stockpiling of construction materials

1. Stockpiling has been done in designated places with barricade and signage.

No issue NA

2. Quarry/ Borrow pit operations

2. The contractor is obtaining sand and sub grade from the licensed quarries. The borrow earth requirement is not there at present in the project.

3. Stripping, stocking and preservation of top soil.

3. Top soil has been stored in designated places for later use in landscaping.

4. Soil erosion 4. No cutting or steep slope issues involved in the project. Small excavations are protected with steel sheets or wooden boards

5. Water pollution due to fuel and lubricants, construction waste

5. The fuel and lubricants are not stored at site and are purchased from market as per need.

6. Siltation of water bodies

6. No disposal done in the water body

7. Generation of dust 7. Generation of dust is on account of material handling at site. Necessary dust suppression measures such as water sprinkling are followed

8. Emission of construction vehicles, Equipment & Machinery

8. Materials carrying vehicle are covered- reducing dust hazard & Water sprinkling at construction site for arresting dust


9. Only vehicles with PUC certificate allowed at the construction site

10. Material handling at site

10. Proper Material handling is being done for storage and disposal as per EMP

11. Disposal of construction waste/debris

11. Disposal of the construction waste as per Mitigation

78

IEE/EMP Components



Compliance Issues

Corrective Actions

measures in EMP 12. Safety measures

during Contractor. 12. Using Personal

Protective Equipment like helmets and gum boot are being used by workers.

First Aid Box is available at working site. Orientation on Health & Safety of workers, given. Engaged all workforces from nearby village.

13. Construction Staff causing disruption to migratory birds

13. Staff oriented on the sensitivity of area wrt birds (work site is quite away from reservoir so as to impact birds.)

14. Clearing of construction camps and restoration

14. Since work is in progress. Restoration of site will be start after completion of the work.

O & M impacts Environmental Conditions Uncontrolled tourism flow Operation and management of Water Sports Activity

PMU, UTDB Not reached Operation phase

NA

1. Operation of Motor Boats

2. Demarcation and Flagging

3. Zonation of risky, shallow and sensitive areas

4. Health and Safety risks

79

6. Approach & Methodology engaged for environmental monitoring of the project

5. Continuous monitoring of EMP implementation is being carried out by DSC, PIU and PMU.

6. Concerned staff of DSC and PIU visit the construction sites and report to Team Leader DSC and PMC about

issues/ problems related to environmental non-compliance. Necessary directions, in case of non-compliance are

being issued to the contractors on the site and through letters about the procedures to resolve the

problems/issues or requirements. The Safeguards Staff of DSC conduct regular site visits to monitor the

implementation of safeguards measures on sites. In the reporting period PMU organized orientation program for

all technical persons of PMU, PIU, DSC, PMC and Contractors and plans to organize more such programs in

future.

7. Monitoring of environmental receptors/ attributes

Monitoring basis

7. Monitoring for the implementation of Environmental Monitoring Plan/Management Plan is required to be done

to check if any adverse impact is being caused by the construction activities. The monitoring of these variables is

to be carried out in construction sites within 100 m impact zone of the sub project.

8. The monitoring of environmental variables is to be carried out as per the agreed Environmental Monitoring

Plan.

Type of environmental receptor/ attribute to be monitored

9. The environmental attributes to be monitored include the air, noise and water quality parameters at the

construction sites in sub project sites. The air quality parameters monitored include RSPM (PM10), SO2 and NO2.

The water quality parameters include temperature, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO),

biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS) and turbidity. In

case of noise the day time Leq values are monitored.

Methods of monitoring and equipment used

10. The following standard methodology is being used for monitoring

Table 8: Parameters and Methodology for Environmental Monitoring

Parameter Methodology

RSPM (PM10) High Volume Sampler method (attached with cyclone)/ Respirable Dust samplers.

SO2 Modified West and Gaeke Method

NO2 Jacob &Hochheiser Modified (Sodium Arsenite) Method.

Noise Level Direct Reading Sound Level Meter.

Temperature Digital/Mercury Thermometer Method.

pH Electrometric Method.

EC Electrometric Method.

DO Winkle’s Method Using Azide Modification

BOD5 Five Days BOD as per APHA 2005

TDS Digital Meter Method.

80

Parameter Methodology

TSS Gravimetry (Filtration and Drying at 105oc)

Turbidity Nephelo Turbidity Method.

8. Implementation of Environmental Monitoring Plan

PIU wise implementation of Environmental Monitoring Plan for sub projects is shown in tables 9

Table 9 (i): Implementation of Environmental Monitoring Plan- For Projects under DSC Dehradun

Component

Periods of

monitorin

g

Parameters/Pol

lutants Standard

Base line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementation

Remarks

UK/IDIPT-III/DDN/01 Development of Tourism Infrastructure Facilities at Asan Barrage

(Operation stage monitoring)

Noise (near

main gate of

project site)

02.03.17 -

03.03.17

Sound Level Leq. dB(A)

Noise Standards for 55 dB( A) for Day Time and 45 dB( A) for Night Time

Lmax -48.9(Day), 38.1 (Night) dB(A)

Lmin – 36.4(Day), 31.4(Night) dB(A)

Leq –

40.8(Day), 33.2(Night) dB(A)

CPBC limit for silence Zone db(A)-50.0 (Day), 40.0 (Night)

Within permissible limits

Noise (near

back side

of project

site)

02.03.17 -

03.03.17

Sound Level Leq. dB(A)

Noise Standards for 55 dB( A) for Day Time and

45 dB( A) for Night Time



Leq – 42.8(Day), 35.7(Night) dB(A)

CPBC limit for


81

Component

Periods of

monitorin

g

Parameters/Pol

lutants Standard

Base line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementation

Remarks

silence Zone db(A)-50.0 (Day), 40.0 (Night)

Ambient Air

Quality

(near back

side of

project site)

02.03.17-

03.03.17

Particulate Matter (PM10), µg/m3

100 66.74


Particulate Matter (PM2.5),

µg/m3

60 39.32

Sulphur Dioxide (So2). µg/m3

80 13.56

Nitrogen Dioxide (No2) µg/m3

80 21.10

Carbon

Monoxide (Co), mg/m3

4 0.49

Ambient Air

Quality

(near main

gate of

project site)

02.03.17-

03.03.17


100 68.18

Particulate Matter (PM2.5), µg/m3

60 38.20


80 09.56

Nitrogen Dioxide (No2) µg/m3 80 22.33

82

Component

Periods of

monitorin

g

Parameters/Pol

lutants Standard

Base line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementation

Remarks

Carbon Monoxide (Co), mg/m3

4 0.45

Water

Quality

(drinking

water( tap

water )

canteen

area)

02.03.17

PH (at 25°C)

Colour

Turbidity

Odour

Taste

Total Hardness as CaCo3

Calcium as Ca

Alkalinty as CaCo3

Chloride as CI

Magnesium as Mg

Total Dissolved Solids

Iron as Fe

Copper as Cu

Total Coliform

E. Coli

CPCB Standards for Surface water bodies and Drinking Water

Standards for Potable water

7.40

<5

BDL

Agreeable

Agreeable

193.21

62.34

234.15

51.45

9.15

290.0

0.14

<0.05

<2/100ml

Absent


Water

Quality

(lake of

Asan

Barrage)

02.03.17

PH (at 25°C)

Colour

Turbidity

Total Hardness

as CaCo3

Calcium as Ca

Alkalinty as CaCo3

Chloride as CI

Magnesium as

CPCB Standards for Surface water bodies

7.72

<5

BDL

134.12

45.10

169.88

14.30

5.24


83

Component

Periods of

monitorin

g

Parameters/Pol

lutants Standard

Base line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementation

Remarks

Mg

Sulfate

Nitrate

Flouride

Sodium as Na

Potassium as K

TKN as N

Total Phosphorous

COD

Phenolic Compound

Iron as Fe

Boron

Sodium Absorption ratio

Free Ammonia as N

Dissolved Oxygen

BOD(3 days at 27)

Zinc as Zn

Arsenic as As

Mercury as Hg

Total dissolved Solids

44.23

1.36

0.65

12.45

24.65

1.97

0.32

10

<.002

0.18

0.11

1.23

0.82

4.10

5.40

0.21

<0.012

<0.002

270.00

UK/IDIPT/DDN/03 Development of Yamuna Circuit Tiger fall (Operation stage monitoring)

Noise (near 04.03.17 - Sound Level Leq. Noise Lmax -

84

Component

Periods of

monitorin

g

Parameters/Pol

lutants Standard

Base line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementation

Remarks

Tiger fall

parking)

05.03.17 dB(A) Standards for 55 dB( A) for Day Time and 45 dB( A) for Night Time

52.5(Day), 42.7 (Night) dB(A)



CPBC limit for residential Zone db(A)-55.0 (Day), 45.0 (Night)


Noise (near

Track trail)

04.03.17 -

05.03.17 Sound Level Leq. dB(A)

Noise Standards for 55 dB( A) for Day Time and

45 dB( A) for Night Time


Lmin –

43.5(Day), 34.4(Night) dB(A)


CPBC limit for residential Zone db(A)-55.0 (Day), 45.0

(Night)


85

Component

Periods of

monitorin

g

Parameters/Pol

lutants Standard

Base line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementation

Remarks

Ambient Air

Quality

(Track trail)

04.03.17 –

05.03.17






100

60

80

80

4

63.50

38.66

10.27

19.77

0.48


Ambient Air

Quality

(near

parking

site)

04.03.17 –

05.03.17 Particulate Matter (PM10), µg/m3


Sulphur Dioxide (SO2). µg/m3

Nitrogen Dioxide (N O2) µg/m3


100

60

80

80

4

57.39

29.23

08.56

17.33

0.41


Water

Quality

(canteen

area)

04/03/17

PH (at 25°C)

Colour

Turbidity

Odour

Ground water IS 10500-2012

7.45

<5

BDL

Agreeable


86

Component

Periods of

monitorin

g

Parameters/Pol

lutants Standard

Base line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementation

Remarks

Taste

Total Hardness as CaCo3

Calcium as Ca

Alkalinty as CaCo3

Chloride as CI

Magnesium as Mg

Total Dissolved Solids

Iron as Fe

Copper as Cu

Total Coliform

E. Coli

Agreeable

193.21

54.45

121.00

15.45

26.32

310.56

0.14

<0.05

<2/100ml

Absent

UK/IDIPT-III/DDN/03 Lakhamandal Temple (Operation stage monitoring)

Noise

(surroundi

ng area of

the

Temple,

Lakhamna

dal)

08.03.17

-

09.03.17

Sound Level

Leq. dB(A)

Noise

Standards

for 55

dB( A) for

Day Time

and 45 dB(

A) for Night

Time




CPBC limit for residential Zone db(A)-55.0 (Day),

Within permissible

limits

87

45.0 (Night)

Noise

(Near

village,

Lakhama

ndal)

08.03.17

-

09.03.17

Sound Level

Leq. dB(A)

Noise

Standards

for 55

dB( A) for

Day Time

and 45 dB(

A) for Night

Time


Lmin –

42.2(Day), 32.8(Night) dB(A)

Leq – 45.9(Day),

37.4(Night) dB(A)

CPBC limit for residential Zone db(A)-

55.0 (Day), 45.0 (Night)

Within permissible

limits

Ambient

Air

Quality

(near

Lakhama

ndal

Temple)

08.03.17

-

09.03.17






100

60

80

80

4

62.20

32.14

8.26

18.30

0.36

Within permissible

limits

88

Ambient

Air

Quality

(near

parking

site)

08.03.17 -

09.03.17

Particulate

Matter (PM10), µg/m3


Sulphur Dioxide (SO2). µg/m3

Nitrogen Dioxide (N O2) µg/m3

Carbon Monoxide (Co), µg/m3

100

60

80

80

4

64.25

37.40

10.20

19.50

0.44


Water

Quality

(Near

Temple

Lakhamand

al)

08/03/17

PH (at 25°C)

Colour

Turbidity

Odour

Taste

Total Hardness

as CaCo3

Calcium as Ca

Alkalinty as

CaCo3

Chloride as CI

Magnesium as

Mg

Total Dissolved

Solids

Iron as Fe

Copper as Cu

Total Coliform

E. Coli

Ground

water IS

10500-

2012

7.46

<5

BDL

Agreeable

Agreeable

210.42

65.18

245.46

20.45

11.61

320.00

0.19

<0.05

<2/100ml

Absent

Within permissible

limits

89

UK/IDIPT/DDN/04 Development of Yamuna Circuit Deoban FRH (Operation stage monitoring)

Noise

Near main

gate of

FRH,

Deoban

7/03/2017

Sound Level Lmax, Lmin. dB(A)

Noise Standards for 50.00 dB( A) for Day Time and 40.00 dB( A) for Night Time (Silence Zone)

- Lmax -46.5 (Day), 38.3 (Night) dB(A)

Lmin – 36.2(Day), 29.7 (Night) dB(A)

Leq -42.4 (Day), 34.7 (Night) dB(A)

Values are well within permissible level

Air Quality

(Near main

gate of

FRH)

06/03/2017 - 07/03/2017

SO2, NOX, CO ,

PM10 and PM2.5

NAAQS

Standards

-

Industrial, Residential,

Rural and other Areas

Particulate Matter < 10 micron

100 µg/m3

64.40 µg/m3 All parameters of ambient air quality are well within the limits

Particulate Matter < 2.5 micron

60µg/m3

- 41.50 µg/m3

Sulphur dioxide,(SO2 )

80 µg/m3

7.40 µg/m3

Nitrogen dioxide(NO2)

80 µg/m3

16.25 µg/m3

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

04 mg/m3

for 08 hrs

0.54 mg/m3

Water

Quality

(Near

Kitchen

area)

(07/03/17) Drinking Water

Tap

CPCB Drinking Water

Standards for Potable water

1. pH-7.36

2. Colour<5

3. Turbidity –BDL

4. Odour-

Agreeable

5. Taste-

Agreeable

6. Total

Hardness -

174.26

7. Calcium as Ca

-58.45

8. Total Alkalinity

-193.56

90

9. Chloride-18.21

10. Magnesium -

6.90

11. Total

Dissolved

solid-254.00

12. Iron as Fe-

0.11

13. Copper as Cu

-<0.05

14. Total Coliform

-<2/1000ml

15. E.coli-Absent

91

Table 9 (ii): Implementation of Environmental Monitoring Plan- For Projects under DSC Kotdwar

Componen

t

Periods of

monitorin

g

Parameters/Pollutant

s Standard

Base

line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementatio

n

Remarks

UK/IDIPT/KOT/01 Development of Tourism Infrastructure For North Corbett Entry Point at Kotdwara

Noise Winter

season

Sound Level Leq. dB(A) Noise

Standards

for 65

dB( A) for

Day Time

and 55 dB(

A) for Night

Time at

camp site

as site is in

urban and

commercial

area and 75

dB ( A) for

Day at

Constructio

n site and

70 dB( A) in

Night Time

at

Constructio

n site

Leq

(Day) =

59.00

dB (A)

Winter

season

1- At

construction

site

Leq ( Day ) =

50.40 dB ( A)

Leq (Night)

=41.1 dB(A)

Leq ( Min)

=39.8

Leq (Max)

=58.0 dB(A)

Construction

camp

demolished so

no

construction

camp data

The

measured

values are

well within

the limits

at sub

project site

Air Quality Winter

Season

SO2, NOX, CO , PM10

and PM2.5

NAAQS

Standards

Industrial,

Residential,

Rural and other

Areas

Particulate Matter < 10

micron

100 µg/m3

76.30

µg/m3

88.2 µg/m3 (at

construction

activity area of

project site )

Monitored

ambient air

quality is

well within

the

stipulated

limits at

sub project

site

Particulate Matter < 2.5

micron



60µg/m3

80 µg/m3

80 µg/m3

02 mg/m3

52.80 µg/m3 14.50 µg/m3 11.70 µg/m3

46.80 µg/m3

(at construction

activity area of

project site)

22.0 µg/m3 (at

construction

activity area of

project site)

26.1 µg/m3(at

construction

activity area of

project site)

92

Componen

t

Periods of

monitorin

g


s Standard

Base

line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementatio

n

Remarks


for 08 hrs BDL

0.70 mg/m3

(at construction

activity area of

project site)

Water

Quality

Winter

Season

Parameters specified

for Drinking water in

IS: 10500

1- Drinking Water at

Camp and

Construction site

Drinking

Water

Standards

specified in

IS: 10500

1-

Colour-= <5 Hazen Unit

2- Odour= Agreeabl

e

3-pH= 7.3

4- Total Hardness as

CaCO3= 166 mg/l

5- TDS= 376 mg/l

6- BOD= no test done

7- Total Coliform=

Not detected

8- E-Coli=

Not detected

9- Iron as Fe =Nil

mg/l

10- Chloride as Cl= 69 mg/l

11- Fluoride

as F = 0.74 mg/l

1- Colour-= <1

Hazen Unit

2- Odour=

Agreeable

3-pH= 7.2

4- Total

Hardness as

CaCO3= 220

mg/l

5- TDS= 346

mg/l

6- BOD= no

test done

7- Total

Coliform= Not

detected

8- Iron as Fe

<0.1 mg/l

9- Chloride as

Cl= 30 mg/l

11- Fluoride as

F < 0.20 mg/l

All

parameter

s in the

drinking

water

sample

are well

within

Drinking

Water

standards.

93

Componen

t

Periods of

monitorin

g


s Standard

Base

line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementatio

n

Remarks

UK/IDIPT/KOT/03-Lot-2 Development of Adventure Tourist Centre at Tehri

Noise Winter

season

Sound Level Leq. dB(A) Noise

Standards

for 55

dB( A) for

Day Time

and 45 dB(

A) for Night

Time

Winter

season

1- At

Completed

Building of

subproject

Leq ( Day ) =

51.7 dB ( A)

Leq (Night)

=41.9 dB(A)

Leq ( Min)

=40.1

Leq (Max)

=60.40 dB(A)

Construction

camp

demolished so

no

construction

camp data

The

measured

values are

well within

the limits

at sub

project site

Air Quality Winter

Season

SO2, NOX, CO , PM10

and PM2.5

NAAQS

Standards

-

Industrial,

Residential,

Rural and other

Areas

Monitored

ambient air

quality is

well within

the

stipulated

limits at

sub project

site

Particulate Matter < 10

micron

100

- 79.9 µg/m3 (at

construction

activity area of

project site )

Particulate Matter < 2.5

micron

Sulphur dioxide,(So2 )


60µg/m3

80 µg/m3

80 µg/m3

02 mg/m3

-

-

-

38.9 µg/m3 (at

construction

activity area of

project site)

14.4 µg/m3 (at

construction

activity area of

project site)

22.0 µg/m3(at

construction

activity area of

project site)

94

Componen

t

Periods of

monitorin

g


s Standard

Base

line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementatio

n

Remarks


for 08 hrs

-

0.30 mg/m3

(at construction

activity area of

project site)

Water

Quality

Winter

Season

As specified in IS:

10500 -2012 (

Drinking water

standards)

1- Ground Water at

Subproject site

2 Tehri Lake Water

near Subproject site

As

specified in

IS: 10500-

2012 for

drinking

water

CPCB

Standards

-

-

1- Colour-= <1

Hazen Unit

2- Odour=

Agreeable

3-pH= 7.58

4- Total

Hardness as

CaCO3= 280

mg/l

5- TDS= 314

mg/l

6- BOD= no

test done

7- Total

Coliform= Not

detected

8- Iron as Fe

<0.1 mg/l

9- Chloride as

Cl= 40 mg/l

11- Fluoride as

F < 0.20 mg/l

1-PH=7.3

2- Dissolved

Oxygen =6 mg/l

3- BOD (3 Days

at 27 oC)=

< 1mg/l

All

parameter

s in the

drinking

water

sample

are well

within

Drinking

Water

standards.

Disolved

Oxygen,

pH, BOD

and

coliform

bacteria

parameter

s meet the

CPCB

norm for

surface

water

category A

95

Componen

t

Periods of

monitorin

g


s Standard

Base

line

status

Monitoring

result during

project

Implementatio

n

Remarks

4- COD =

<5mg/l

5-Electrical

Conductivity=

305 mg/l

6- Ammonia=

<10 mg/l

7-Coliform =

Absent

96

Table 9 (iii): Implementation of Environmental Monitoring Plan- For Projects under PIU Bhimtal

Component Periods of

monitoring

Parameters/Pollut

ants Standard

Base

line

statu

s

Monitoring result

during project

Implementation

Remarks

UK/IDIPT/BHT/03 Lot1 Trek Trail From Pithoragrah to Chandak(Operation stage monitoring)

Noise (21.03.17-22.03.17)


Noise Standards for 55 dB( A) for Day Time and 45

dB( A) for Night Time (Residential Zone)

- In front of the pump house






Noise Summer Season

(21.03.17-22.03.17)


Noise Standards for 55 dB( A) for Day Time and 45 dB( A) for

Night Time (Residential Zone)

Back side of the pump house



Leq – 44.5(Day),

38.2(Night) dB(A)


Air Quality

(In front of

the Pump

house)

Summer Season (21.03.17-22.03.17)

SO2, NOX, CO ,

PM10 and PM2.5

NAAQS

Standards

-




100 µg/m3

66.30 µg/m3

97


monitoring

Parameters/Pollut

ants Standard

Base

line

statu

s

Monitoring result

during project

Implementation

Remarks


60µg/m3 - 39.45 µg/m3


80 µg/m3 12.33 µg/m3


80 µg/m3

20.77 µg/m3


02 mg/m3

for 08 hrs

0.50 mg/m3

Air

Quality-

(Back side

of the

Pump

house)

Summer Season

(21.03.17-22.03.17)

SO2, NOX, CO ,

PM10 and PM2.5

NAAQS

Standards

-



All parameters of ambient air quality are well within the limits. Particulate Matter <

10 micron 100 µg/m3

69.30 µg/m3

Particulate Matter <

2.5 micron

60µg/m3 - 47.23 µg/m3


80 µg/m3 14.23 µg/m3


80 µg/m3

23.21 µg/m3


02 mg/m3

for 08 hrs

0.40 mg/m3

UK/IDIPT/BHT/03 Lot2 Most Manu Temple, Pithoragarh(Operation stage monitoring)

Air Quality

(Main Gate)

Summer Season (19.03.17-20.03.17)

SO2, NOX, CO ,

PM10 and PM2.5

NAAQS

Standards

-




100 µg/m3

58.20 µg/m3 At Near Construction Site

All parameters of ambient air quality are well within the limits


60µg/m3 - 30.45 µg/m3 At Near Construction Site



98


monitoring

Parameters/Pollut

ants Standard

Base

line

statu

s

Monitoring result

during project

Implementation

Remarks

80 µg/m3


80 µg/m3 18.52 µg/m3 At Near Construction Site


02 mg/m3

for 08 hrs

0.31 mg/m3 At Near Construction Site

Air Quality

(Back side)

Summer

Season (19.03.17-20.03.17)

SO2, NOX, CO ,

PM10 and PM2.5

NAAQS

Standards

-




100 µg/m3




60µg/m3

- 32.42 µg/m3 At Near Construction Site


80 µg/m3



80 µg/m3


Carbon Monoxide

(CO)

02 mg/m3

for 08 hrs

0.36 mg/m3 At Near

Construction Site

Noise

(Back Side)

Summer Season (19.03.17-20.03.17)


Noise Standards for 65.00 dB( A) for

Day Time and 55.00 dB( A) for Night Time (Commercial Zone)

- Lmax -51.5(Day), 45.3 (Night) dB(A)

Lmin – 42.6(Day), 35.7 (Night) dB(A)

Leq – 46.4(Day), 40.4 (Night) dB(A)

CPCB limit for residential Zone db(A)-55.0 (Day), 45.0 (Night) dB(A)


Noise (In

main gate)

Summer Season (19.03.17-20.03.17)


Noise Standards for 65.00 dB( A) for

- Lmax -54.8(Day), 45.5 (Night) dB(A)

Lmin – 43.0 (Day), 36.3(Night) dB(A)


99


monitoring

Parameters/Pollut

ants Standard

Base

line

statu

s

Monitoring result

during project

Implementation

Remarks

Day Time and 55.00 dB( A) for Night Time (Commercial Zone)



UK/IDIPT/BHT/01 TRH Parichay

Noise

(site

surroundin

g)

Summer Season

(17.03.17-

18.03.17)


Noise Standards for 65.00 dB( A) for Day Time and 55.00 dB( A) for

Night Time (Commercial Zone)

- At Near Construction Site

Lmax -50.4(Day), 43.6

(Night) dB(A)





Noise

(Back side

of the

Pump

house)

Summer Season

(17.03.17-18.03.17)


Noise Standards for

65.00 dB( A) for Day Time and 55.00 dB( A) for Night Time (Commercial Zone)

- At Near Construction Site

Lmax -48.8.4(Day), 44.4 (Night) dB(A)





Air Quality

(Near main

gate of the

Pump

house)

Summer Season

(17.03.17-18.03.17)

SO2, NOX, CO ,

PM10 and PM2.5

NAAQS

Standards

-



100


monitoring

Parameters/Pollut

ants Standard

Base

line

statu

s

Monitoring result

during project

Implementation

Remarks


100 µg/m3




60µg/m3

- 44.70 µg/m3 At Near Construction Site






02 mg/m3

for 08 hrs

0.53 mg/m3 At Near Construction Site

Water

Quality

Summer Season

Drinking Tap

Water Near

Construction Site

CPCB Standards for Surface water bodies and Drinking Water Standards for Potable water

1. pH-7.40

2. Colour <5

3. Turbidity –BDL

4. Odour –

Agreeable

5. Taste –

Agreeable

6. Total Hardness

-193.21

7. Calcium as

Ca- 54.45

8. Alkalinity -

121.20

9. Chloride-15.45

10. Magnesium

and Mg- 26.32

11. Total

Dissolved

Solids –

310.56

12. Iron -0.14

13. Copper<0.05

14. Total Coliform

<2/100ml

15. E-Coli –Absent

All parameters of drinking water are well within the limits of Drinking water specified in IS: 10500

Water

Quality

(17.03.17) Surface water

Naukuchiatal Lake

CPCB Standards

1. pH-7.58

2. Colour<5

101


monitoring

Parameters/Pollut

ants Standard

Base

line

statu

s

Monitoring result

during project

Implementation

Remarks

for Surface water bodies and Drinking Water Standards for Potable water

3. Turbidity –

BDL(DL-I

NTU)

4. Total

Hardness -

250.20

5. Calcium as Ca

-76.23

6. Total Alkalinity

-270.45

7. Chloride-36.45

8. Magnesium

Hardness -

14.53

9. Sulfate as

SO4- 54.26

10. Nitrate as

NO3-1.82

11. Flouride as F -

0.82

12. Sodium as Na

– 20.45

13. Potassium as

K- 58.26

14. TKN as N-

4.34

15. Total

Phosphorous -

0.78

16. COD-64.10

17. Phenolic

Compound -

<0.002

18. Iron as Fe-

0.48

19. Boron -0.29

20. Sodium

Absorption

ratio -1.90

21. Free Ammonia

as N-0.53

22. Dissolved

Oxygen -8.10

102


monitoring

Parameters/Pollut

ants Standard

Base

line

statu

s

Monitoring result

during project

Implementation

Remarks

23. BOD(3 days at

27) -17.00

24. Zinc as Zn-

0.42

25. Arsanic as As

-<0.012

26. Mercury as Hg

-<0.002

27. Total

dissolved

Solids -454.00

Water

Quality -

Tap

27.03.17 Drinking Water

Tap

CPCB Standards for Surface

water bodies and Drinking Water Standards for Potable water

1. pH-7.40

2. Colour<5

3. Turbidity –BDL

4. Odour-

Agreeable

5. Taste-

Agreeable

6. Total

Hardness -

193.21

7. Calcium as Ca

-54.45

8. Total Alkalinity

-121.00

9. Chloride-15.45

10. Magnesium -

26.32

11. Total

Dissolved

solid-310.56

12. Iron as Fe-

0.14

13. Copper as Cu

-<0.05

14. Total Coliform

-<2/1000ml

15. E.coli-Absent

103

Average variation in Physico- chemical parameters of Lake Naukuchiyatal

PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF WATER OF LAKE NAUKUCHIYATAL

Parameters April , 2017 May , 2017 June , 2017

Ist

fortnight

IInd

fortnight

Ist

fortnight

IInd

fortnight

Ist

fortnight

IInd

fortnight

Atm. Tem. (°C) 20.5 22.5 23.25 21.95 25.00 25.60

Water temp. (°C)

Surface 20.14 20.58 21.70 22.51 24.39 25.41

8 m depth 18.38 19.35 21.01 22.34 24.08 24.93

16 m depth 18.33 19.20 20.81 22.21 24.01 24.75

24 m depth 18.30 19.10 20.73 21.98 23.97 24.64

32 m depth 18.30 19.00 20.60 21.74 23.87 24.51

Transparency (cm) 177.5 180 159.60 133.60 141.53 132.60

TDS (mg/l) 80.6 81 87.00 85.90 82.73 82.80

Conductivity (µS/cm) 238 242 239.6 249.2 261.4 260.9

DO (mg/l)

Surface 11.04 10.83 10.71 10.62 10.02 9.43

8 m depth 10.88 10.76 10.56 10.08 9.58 8.83

16 m depth 10.61 10.36 9.92 9.78 9.17 8.52

24 m depth 10.10 9.90 9.55 9.01 8.40 7.80

32 m depth 2.98 3.03 3.51 2.86 2.53 2.39

Turbidity (NTU) 13.75 12.00 15.25 15.25 13.00 15.17

pH 8.57 7.50 7.84 8.49 7.95 8.17

Free CO2 (mg/l) 1.55 1.70 1.99 2.15 2.45 2.63

Total Alkalinity (mg/l) 136.0 135.0 129.7 136.0 137.3 136.1

Total hardness (mg/l) 152 156.00 155.50 165.00 - -

Iron (mg/l) 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.42 0.40 0.36

Chloride (mg/l) - - - - - -

Silica (mg/l) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

Nitrate (mg/l) 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.79 1.77 1.73

Phosphate (mg/l) 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00

Heavy Metal Analysis: Lake Naukuchiyatal

Metals Concentrations(µg/l)

S.NO Site 2 Site 4

1. Lead ( Pb) 0.077 0.081

2. Cadmium ( Cd) 0.000 0.000

3. Zinc ( Zn) 0.020 0.000

4. Copper ( Cu) 0.000 0.0001

104

Soil Analysis

S.No. Parameters Values

1. Sand (%) 8

2. Silt (%) 20

3. Clay (%) 72

4. pH 7.9

5. Nitrogen (mg/100g soil) 10

6. Phosphorous(mg/100g soil) 5

7. Organic carbon (%) 1.95

Note:- � ** Value based on result of the report (Mar to June 2017) submitted by Pantnagar University.

9. Institutional Arrangements

Program Management

11. The Government of Uttarakhand through Department of Tourism (DOT) is the Executing Agency (EA). The

EA (i) assumes overall responsibility for the execution of the Project and reporting; (ii) engage adequate

permanent or fixed-term staff to implement the Project; (iii) setup a state-level project management unit (PMU)

and project implementation units (PIU); (iv) provide overall strategic guidance on technical supervision and

project execution; and (v) ensure overall compliance with the loan covenants.

12. The implementing agency (IA) is the Uttarakhand Tourism Development Board (UTDB). The IA’s

responsibilities include (i) project planning and budgeting; (ii) day-to-day assistance, supervision and guidance

for the project implementation units and their consultants; (iii) review subprojects for due diligence requirements

and approve subproject proposals; (iv) bidding, evaluation and contract award; (v) managing and disbursing

funds; (vi) review compliance with loan covenants, contract specifications, work plans and quality control; and

(vii) consolidate and submit progress reports, finance and accounting / audit reports, and matters requiring higher

level decision to state-level empowered committee (SLEC) and ADB.

13. A State-level empowered committee (SLEC) has been established in Uttarakhand, chaired by state’s Chief

Secretary, with Principal Secretary/Secretary of the Department of Tourism as member secretary and comprised

of secretaries from relevant line departments. The SLEC have been empowered to take all decisions on behalf of

the State and will (i) act as a policy making body, (ii) provide overall advice and guidance to the State’s executing

agency and PMU, and (iii) accord all approvals under the Project.

14. Dept. of Tourism (DoT) has established a PMU, headed by a full-time program director (PD), and consisting

of personnel drawn from relevant line departments and market. Project Management Unit (PMU) is established in

Dehradun for the overall project management. The PMU is the nodal agency for overall management of all

program activities and will be responsible for: (i) project planning and budgeting; (ii) providing day-to-day

assistance, supervision and guidance for the PIUs and their consultants; (iii) reviewing subprojects to satisfy

ADB’s due diligence requirements and approving subproject proposals submitted by PIU and line departments;

(iv) bidding, evaluation and contract award; (v) managing and disbursing funds; (vi) reviewing compliance with

loan covenants, contract specifications, work plans and quality control; (vii) consolidating and submitting

progress reports, finance and accounting/audit reports, and matters requiring higher-level decision, to the SLEC

and ADB. The PMU will be supported by a team of consultants.

105

15. The sub-project is being implemented by the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) of IA, i.e. UTDB, comprising

of personnel drawn from relevant line departments and outside of government and headed by a Project manager.

03 Project Implementation Units (PIU) have been established for each of the three circuits namely Bhimtal,

Dehradun and Kotdwar. The PIUs are responsible for: (i) prioritizing and preparing subproject proposals; (ii)

providing day-to-day assistance, supervision and guidance to the design and supervision consultants; (iii)

conducting detailed assessments and surveys including public consultation and input from stakeholders; (iv)

preparing detailed designs, specifications, schedule of quantity, bidding documents, and related documentation;

(v) implementing civil works and related activities; (vi) reporting to PMU; (vii) preparing regular progress reports

for the SLEC, the executing agency and ADB through PMU; and (viii) supervising construction, conducting

quality control, approving progress payments to contractors; and (ix) maintaining records and accounts on an up-

to-date basis and making these available to ADB, its missions, or auditors for inspection.

16. The Project Management Consultant (PMC) has been engaged to provide support to the PMU in overall

planning, risk management, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of projects under the Investment

Program. The PMC also assists the PMU and PIUs in meeting the relevant requirements of ADB, Government of

Uttarakhand, and Government of India for project implementation. The PMC reports and works under the overall

guidance of the PMU. The scope of services of the PMC includes but not necessarily be limited to: (i) planning,

reporting, and communication; (ii) establishment of procedures and systems; (iii) review and preparation of plans,

manuals and reports; (iv) overall Investment Program management, monitoring and implementation of PPMS;

and (v) social, environmental, archaeological, occupational health and safety, community participation and

gender action compliance monitoring.

17. The Design and Supervision Consultants (DSC) have been engaged to provide all necessary support to and

coordination with the EA, IAs, PMU and any other consultants engaged by the authorities to achieve the desired

outcomes of the Investment Program. The DSC reports to and work under the overall guidance of the PIUs. The

scope of services of the DSC includes but not necessarily be limited to: (i) surveys, verification of feasibility

studies and base maps; (ii) project planning and management support to the PIU; (iii) finalization of design

criteria, preparation of manuals, guidelines and systems; (iv) preparation of detailed design and bid documents;

(v) construction management and contract administration; (vi) environmental, social, archaeological, cultural

heritage, community participation and gender action compliance monitoring; and (vii) capacity building of the

service providers for operational sustainability.

9.1 Institutional Arrangements For EMP Implementation

18. The institutional arrangements specify the arrangements for the implementation of environmental provisions

of the entire project.

Project Management Unit (PMU)

19. A Safeguards Specialist (SGS) is positioned in the PMU, who is responsible for overall implementation of the

environmental safeguard provisions. To look into the matters of forest coordination, a Forest Conservation

Specialist is also placed in the PMU.

Project Management Consultant (PMC) and Design and Supervision Consultants (DSC)

20. Project Management Consultants (PMC) and Design and Supervision Consultants (DSC) have been

recruited to provide assistance to the PMU and PIUs respectively in project implementation. Within the PMC

team an Environment Safeguards Specialist is positioned to provide overall direction for management of

environmental issues, and technical support to the PMU including implementation of the environmental

requirements according to ADB requirements, and assist in monitoring impacts and mitigation measures

106

associated with sub-projects. Towards addressing the environmental issues in the project components during

design and implementation, the DSC includes provisions for inputs of Safeguards Specialist Environment.

21. The Safeguards Specialist of the DSC team is responsible for preparation of the Environmental Assessment

documents in line with the Environment Assessment Review Framework (EARF) and supervises the

implementation of the EMP provisions in the various sub-projects.

22. DSC Safeguard Specialist is placed in each of the three DSCs to support environmental management

functions including updating sub-project IEEs in respect to environmental management plans in compliance with

the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement, national and state level environmental policies, rules and regulations,

assisting in preparing IEEs, and assist in monitoring impacts and mitigation measures associated with sub-

projects. He is required to include mitigation measures in designs where appropriate, and to specify other

measures in construction contracts. In addition to addressing the issues related to environmental management in

the project, the DSC Specialist plays a central role in ensuring capability building on Environmental Management

of the PMU/PIU, Contractor and Line Departments.

23. Contractors are required by their contracts to implement all specified mitigation, monitoring, and reporting

assigned to contractors as presented in sub-project IEE. Contractors have appointed Environment and Safety

Officers for implementation of environment and occupational safety provisions at site.

24. Environmental monitoring is being undertaken by the PMU supported by the Safeguards Specialist of DSCs

and PMC

25. Contact Details of Safeguards Team is given below:

Unit Name Mobilized

Since

Phone E-mail

PMU

Ms. Anjali

Semwal

April, 2013 8191995004 [email protected]

PMC Mr. Navin

Handa

Mr. Ardhendu

Mitra

July 2016 –

Till date

July 2013 –

Sep, 2015

+91-

9599510994

PMC requested for replacement of

Expert

DSC

Dehradun

Mr. Ranjan

Mallick

Mr. Abhay

Srivastava

January,

2014 – Till

date

April, 2013 –

June, 2013

+91-

94382000113

[email protected]

DSC

Kotdwar

Mr.

Shreeniwas

October,

2013

+91

9811224458

[email protected]

107

Verma

DSC

Bhimtal

Dr. A.K.

Sharma

Dr. Aman

Sharma

July -

2015 to Till

Date

March -

2013 to May

2015

09799242184

09811487830

[email protected]

[email protected]

10. Consultation Details

26. Public consultations and environment awareness has been carried out in all sub project sites. The same has

been detailed in table 10. Pictures of Consultation and Attendance records have been provided in Annexure 4

&5.

Table 10(i): Stakeholder Consultation Details For Projects under PIU Dehradun Sl. No.

Sub Project Name and Location

Date Members Present

Issues Discussed Outcome

1 Development of Tourism

infrastructure facilities at Asan

Barrage Dehradun- Lot 1

UK/IDIPT/DDN/01

23.05.2017 20 - Proper Management of Sanitation facilities at site. Resort Manager was instructed to increase the number of dustbins at site - Discussion held with Resort Manager, about the newly created facilities in the resort. He pointed certain problems like seepage, etc. Tourists present there were asked about the facilities and their experience.

ADB visited to the site on 23rd May 2017 and the O&M was praised by the team. The Tourists were satisfied from the project. The shortcomings pointed out by the Resort Manager was brought to the attention of PIU and sorted out. The DSC support engineer explained the importance of maintaining the provided facilities in the resort.

2 Development of Yamuna Circuit (Tiger Falls & Lakhamandal Temple)- Lot 1

UK/IDIPT/DDN/03

09.04.2017

12 Meeting with Tiger Fall Committee

DSC staff explain about proper management project sites and its environment The Committee shared its experience of running the project and needed some suggestions. .

3. Development of Yamuna Circuit (Tiger Falls & Lakhamandal Temple)- Lot 1

10.04.2017 10 Meeting with Temple Committee members

DSC staff explain about proper management project sites and its environment The Committee shared its experience of running the

108

UK/IDIPT/DDN/03 project and needed some suggestions

4. Development of Yamuna Circuit

(HanolMahasu) - Lot 3

UK/IDIPT/DDN/05

11.04.2017 14 - Environmental Awareness and safety meeting conducted for labourers, supervisors and DSC,site engineers

The DSC Site Engineer explained about Environmental safety, management and protection to labourer and contractor supervisor and field engineer.



UK/IDIPT/DDN/05


DSC staff explain about proper management project sites and its environment The Committee shared its experience of running the project and needed some suggestions



UK/IDIPT/DDN/05


Elaborate discussion was held on proper management of project sites and its environment .

7 UK/IDIPT/DDN/06

-Lot2 P1

Development of

Adventure Tourist

Centre-Kapkot

15.04.2017 12 Environmental Awareness and safety meeting conducted for labourers, supervisors and DSC,site engineers

The DSC site Engineer

explained about

Environmental safety,

management and protection

to labourer and contractor

supervisor and field

engineer

8 UK/IDIPT/DDN/06

-Lot2 P1

Development of

Adventure Tourist

Centre-Kapkot

30.05.2017 10 Environmental Awareness and safety meeting conducted for labourers, supervisors and DSC,site engineers

The DSC site Engineer

explained about

Environmental safety,

management and protection

to labourer and contractor

supervisor and field

engineer

9 UK/IDIPT/DDN/06

-Lot2 P2

Development of

Adventure Tourist

Centre-Tanakpur

25.03.2017 13 Environmental Awareness and safety meeting conducted for labourers,

The DSC site Engineer explained about Environmental safety, management and protection to labourer and contractor supervisor and field engineer

11 UK/IDIPT/DDN/06-Lot2 P3

Development of Adventure Tourist

Centre-Pauri

03.05.2017 20 Environmental Awareness and safety meeting conducted for labourers,

The DSC site Engineer explained about Environmental safety, management and protection to labourer and contractor supervisor and field engineer

109

Table 10(ii): Stakeholder Consultation Details For Projects under PIU Kotdwar

Sl.

No.

Activity

/Event at a

glance

Date Total

Participant Male Female Discussion/Suggestions

1 UTDB Office, Dehardun

20.02.2017 and 21-02-2017

35 30 5 Workshop on Environment and Social Safeguards Regarding Implementation of Social and Environment Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting System. In this workshop EMP implementation and lessons learnt were discussed. On social issues Gender Action plan and Resettlement Plan implementation were discussed. The queries of contractors and PIU staff on environmental and social safeguards were addressed.

2 UTDB Office, Dehradun

28.04.2017 10 10 - Meeting with APD-PMU, TL-DSC Regarding Progress and impacts of Signage Sub-Project. Environmental impacts, if any, were also discussed.

3 Development of North Entry in Corbett Sub-project

19/05/2017

19 19 0 Workers safety during construction like PPEs and safe handling of construction materials, were discussed. The workers were sensitized on advantage of PPE usage. The cleanliness, sanitation, drinking water facilities etc., at the construction camp were satisfactory. The workers are also happy with these facilities including other facilities like use of cooking gas, bathing facilities, etc. During consultation it was also discussed regarding the wages for categories of labour, it was learned that the labourers are getting wages as per Government Prescribed rates. The contractor was advised to conduct monitoring for summer season and to carry out enumeration of trees at site. The contractor was advised to make preparation for plantation of shrubs and trees at site as monsoon season will start late June.


25.05.2017 12 10 2 Consultation with ADB Mission and APD-PMU, DSC, PIU Regarding Progress Review including environmental and social safeguard of Tranche-2, Tranche-3 projects.

110

Sl.

No.

Activity

/Event at a

glance

Date Total

Participant Male Female Discussion/Suggestions


22.06.2017 7 6 1 Consultation meeting was held to sort out the issue regarding installation of new 3 phase power supply connection at North Entry in Corbett, Kotdwar Project – Participant in meeting GM-GMVN, Dpt.GM-GMVN, Nodal Officer- PMU, PM-PIU, TL-DSC, and Electrical Engineer- DSC.

111

Table 10(iii) Stakeholder Consultation Details For Projects under PIU Bhimtal

S. No.

Name of Sub Project

Location Date of Consultation

Issues Discussed

Member Present Outcome

1. 1. Amelioration of Lake Naukuchiyatal

2. Upgradation of

Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay

Boat house Naukuchiyatal At TRH Parichay

22/02/2017 Discussion with the labourers and representative of the contractor regarding safety measures. Discussion with the local masses and representative of Nav Chalak Kalyan Samiti

Dr. A. K. Sharma Dr. K. K. Gaur Contractor Representative Local Masses and Chairman of Nav Chalak Kalyan Samiti

Nav Chalak Kalyan Samiti was concerned about cleanliness of the lake


2. Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay

Boat house Naukuchiyatal At TRH Parichay

22/05/2017 Discussion with local persons and representatives of Nav Chalak Kalyan Samiti.

Dr. A. K. Sharma Dr. K. K. Gaur representatives of Nav Chalak Kalyan Samiti and locak mass

Water quality parameters were discussed with Nav Chalak Kalyan Samiti


2. Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay

Bhimtal 19/06/2017 Discussion with PIU and local masses to known their present status about these two sub projects.

Dr. A. K. Sharma Dr. K. K. Gaur Contractor Representative Local Masses Representatives of “Nav Chalak Kalyan Samiti”

Public was sensitized about aeration project and visible benefits on lake

4. 1. Work of View Point at Mostamanu Temple

2. Trek Trail from Pithoragarh to Chandak

3. Conservation of Pithoragarh Fort Phase-I

Pithoragarh 21/06/2017 Discussion with the local masses & representative of regarding present status of work under the sub projects & labourers problems.

Dr. A. K. Sharma Dr. K. K. Gaur Contractor Representative Labourers

Temple Committee members were sensitized about proper maintenance of facilities like toilets in the temple complex. The general public was sensitized about maintenance of the trek

112

11. Any other environmental aspects, impacts observed during implementation which were not

covered earlier

27. No such impact observed during the reporting period.

28. Reluctance on the part of contractors was repeatedly observed for conducting environmental monitoring and

compliance of environmental safeguards. A decision was taken by PMU to get monitoring conducted by DSC’s

after giving adequate notices and information to the contractor while deducting the same from contractor’s

invoice to prevent further non-compliance of the Environment Monitoring Plan. Along with on -site training

programs by DSC Experts, PMU plans to organize regular orientation session on safeguards for the contractors

and Technical team of the PIU, DSC, PMC and PMU. A Two days training workshop on Gender mainstreaming,

Environment-Social Safeguards was organized by the PMU for contractors. (Report Annex ) Along with on -site

training programs by DSC Experts, PMU plans to organize regular orientation session on safeguards for the

contractors and Technical team of the PIU, DSC, PMC and PMU.

12. Details of Complaints received from public and action taken thereof to resolve

29. One complaint was raised by the local community regarding emergence of aquatic weeds during the

reporting period. The Community was briefed that it was due to the process of aeration that the algae has come

up on the surface of the lake and started floating near the bank towards west and east sides of the lake due to

the wind flow. Public was assured that this is temporary phase. The contractor cleaned the lake manually. The

parameters were also monitored by G. B. Pant University, Pant Nagar. Presently the algae and other aquatic

plants are being removed manually by the contractor and Nav Chalak Kalyan Samiti.

30. The local masses / villagers of village Chanauti and boat owners were found satisfied with the installation of

aeration system under the sub project “Amelioration of Lake Naukuchiyatal” including the cleaning process which

was initiated after their complaint earlier regarding the cleaning and odorless water. More over they were found

satisfied with the quality of visibility of the water present in the lake. It is observed that the present dissolve

oxygen level is increasing and reported as 8.31 to 8.5 milligram/ltr on surface and 0.34 to 7.30 mg/l at bottom.

Further, it is to mention that aeration systems are working properly.

31. No other unforeseen and abnormal adverse environmental impact observed during the reporting period

13. Follow up actions and Conclusions

32. Site supervision will be regularly carried out to ensure that environmental impacts are being adequately

mitigated and to ensure continuation of compliance with statutory regulations as required by laws and agreed

upon EMP. The contractors are being regularly guided and instructed to pay attention to environmental issues

and adhere to the provisions of EMP. Training Programs for engineers, contractors, and project staffs are being

conducted and regular informal onsite orientation for the contractor’s supervisory staff and site engineers and

EMP will be continued.

113

Annexure: 1: Photo Illustration Projects Under PIU Dehradun

1. Hanol Site

Complete Site Asan Barrage Finishing Work of Gate: Hamol

TRH under Renovation Pathway Developed in Hanol

Renovation of Front Elevation of Existing Adventure Tourist centre at Tanakpur

114

DTDO’s office at Pauri

Tanakpur Interpretation Center & Floor

work

Toilet under construction

RCC retaining wall under construction, at Kapkot

View of Renovated Guest house, Deovan

115

Annexure: 2: Photo Illustration Projects Under PIU Kotdwar

1. Development of Tourism Infrastructure for North Corbett Entry Point at Kotdwara.

View of Site under preparation for

landscaping

Landscaping and Passageworks under

development at Site

2. Development of Development of Adventure Tourist Centre at Tehri

View of Finished Building

View of Solar Panels on Roof Top of

Building for Water Heating (Energy

Conservation in Project

3. Signage Works in Uttarakhand

116

View of Signage Type 1 View of Signage type 2

View of Signage Type 3 View of Special Signage installed at Tiger

Fall

117

Annexure: 3: Photo Illustration Projects Under PIU Bhimtal

1. Upgradation of Tourist facility at TRH Parichay, Naukuchiyatal

Landscaping Works near Main Building A view of Café Deck

2. Amelioration of Lake Naukuchiyatal

Discussion with local masses about the quality of

work at Naukuchiatal

Discussions with the President Nav Chalak Kalyan

Samiti at Naukuchiatal

Discussion with the community members Stocking of Fishes in Lake Naukuchiyatal

118

3.Trek Trail at Pithoragarh

A View of Trek trail at Pithoragarh View Point At Trek Trail at Pithoragarh

4.Mostamanu Temple, Pithoragarh

Discussion with Mostamanu Temple Committee

Member

Seat wall cluster at Mostamanu Temple

Local Pataal Paving Path at Mostamanu Temple

Tree Guard at Mostamanu Temple

5. “Conservation of Pithoragarh Fort Phase I, Pithoragarh

119

RR Masonry Work of Craft Center at Pithoragarh A View of PCC of Walkway at Pithoragarh Fort

6. Adventure Tourist Center at Baur Jalashay - Lot 2

Seat wall pavilion Parking ramp near boat house

Landscaping Activity Parking Area ready for tiles

Pictures of Consultation Activity During Reporting Period

- ... .... ' ·' - ....

- -

120

Annexure: 4: Photo Illustration of Awareness Generation and Labour Welfare Activities

Meeting with Manager & GMVN Staff, Asan Barrage Meeting with Hanol Temple Committee

Meeting with Panchayat members At

Lakhamandal

Consultation With Labour: North Entry site Consultation With Labour: Tehri site

121

Labour sensitization on Social and Environmental

Safeguards at Pithoragarh Fort

Discussion with the Secretary, Mostamanu

Temple Committee

Meeting with Local NGOs at Pithoragarh Fort Site Meeting & Field visit by Secretary Tourism at

Almora site

Photographs of Medical Camp Organised at Kotdwar project site

\ mwnildland

11n11mt .... • Program for Tourism-ID I PT /U.K} /,OB 1.oan No.: 2833 IND

"Development of North Entry in Corbett Slb,llroject at Kotdwara"

Medical Health Ca ~ ~ mp " i.,l!tOagmo RIIH, \

122

Public Awareness Program in Lake Naukuchiyatal Subproject Area

123

Annexure: 5: Attendance Record of Consultation Activities

Attendance Sheet

SN

, 2

3

4

r 5

6

7

8

9 ,___ ,o ,, 12

f3

,. 16 r 18

17 ,. 19

29

21

22

23

•• 25

26

SN

27

28

29 ,n

A.

Developmont of North Entry in Corbett at Kotdwar Project (UK/IDIPT- II/KOT/01)

A08 Loan No.: 2833

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Signature or Partklpants

Dato: I'\ \o s-1 l";f- .

Name Oc:c:upatk»n contact No,

. ,, . ') .s,:c_ L , . SlgnalUN

6 L---,

'>. r.. . - l),$ ~ ~11v·t10 I""-

\Ju .. -, ~~..A - o~co OS<=- lr•tl•• "7.,.L..

' ' l . -I sf .J,,,1 -

1--

\ , . ...,~. 't,_.- - ... - P.,\.

I, 1_,,~e,;f,t.l S,"7'1 C.,.,.,J, I ,.;,i,:, t'~

D. •- £ - • I • , - ~( r,;.,,._ .:iP, C. ' • .t I .I

- t V:::{ r .. ,, (I. ' ~ / '

I ' "I U, /'""""

~LM- ' ,, . . . . , . • J - ~<:::' i? I,, , •. J - J ' ' ' . ~v" \.

' . .. ' ' , / (, r .Lt 141'-Qf-t, 'Yf :'"' _, ~ ,.,._.., I

" = • ...,

,., . . ' - -• 'J I I

' 777': H< . ..,L

I) - .u//:1. • ,, )?;{ hi l:f,fi, J_ I. ' ~ -

.,,_' ' ' .. -~o I P.0 ,_

-r .. ' -· - - ' -r .. ,. ' ' --,~

., , , . .. .. -t.,, :. .

' - . -\ , .. . , =' ,, t' +<C'il '( di

l A .. ' ,,, '

J<D G,,) .,-f:f' .. .

Name Oc:cupation Contact No. Signature

('.,.- '·- I ... J .. --,u-. " c5; - , . ' I•· ' 7//~ {?ftifF< - -,,. ... ,t .. . 1 ,·n

I

Meeting held on 12.04.2017 regarding hand over of toilet block

to the temple committee for trial. If any problem exists, it may

be resolved. Com

Meeting With Temple Committee Members



be resolved. Committee members suggested tank for toilet

Meeting With Temple Committee Members

Hanol

124



mittee members suggested tank for toilet

c- .I\J l

"""-""•/ '\ \ G"\~T,;..:;- .

~·--··-·;':>

.J\-'::Y>,,.-. r;;f,J '-------~~-----~-----------------_ · "-·v-vf" s.~,,_,(>

125

Attendance Records of Expert Committee Meeting in Naukuchiyatal sub Project

126

Cleanliness drive was carried out around subproject site of lake Naukuchiyatal by Nav Chalak

Kalyan Samiti in association with other tourism market stakeholders.

~~f ~~ldlH qiTmtf ~(fil~ q4e.1 ~ ,a;flcti it~~ :a&tllil

~ - 11<1 -;;i@lfi ~

mim, 4'l'{f'1111df(1 ff'lflW!Wlil1* tf - .mlm ~l~tim ~ a ~ m :cl~41M'I, . Tfta 1+i\f't4idiH 'Iii~ ~I

'ITll ~ ~ ~ ,t/4i,rl 'II ~ 1li1

~-1R\~~ 11,1 °" m t ~ ~ fqifi'q t lflll!'ll ~ ~ 'g ~ fl'II ~ tfRil!i ~ '1fllfa ~1$ ~ il"ftiftt'!lq;rf ;mmilifflllrt'I ~ ~ 1!ilTl11 ~ "lfQ ~ ¥il-Ol.4llt&i i aiili ;ii ii '1:1@ ~ I;;~' ;;;:;:ii~. m 'Fril .fttf.i111n1(1 11>'1 ~ 1 ~ m 1n ~ ~ ~ . zy!l!, ~ . ~ ~ ~ Wd ffl t~ •. 'Fl ~ m,mi Wlll, ~ ~ ffl w, ~ W111-rn "!"I 1N>ii aifim ~fm'Yirnm,~'lflrl.mm ~If[. 11\Wlmf.tmn ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ qn: IJ'li1 ~ ~ ii ~ <fl "1111A f<f.iil 7f!R t ffl1( ~ i "111ft m m ~ tm ~. M;i it;111p~ ~ ~ ~,

127

Annexure: 6: Correspondence with District Administration regarding change of Proposed Location

Baturi –Pancheswar in Champawat to Tanakpur Champawat

Letter from DM, Champawat requesting that the proposed site for Adventure

Center in Champawat “Baturi” is not economically feasible, since the quantity of

water in Saryu river is not available year round. DM requested for change of site

to Tanakpur, which is more suitable for adventure related activities, as there is

sufficient amount of water in river Mahakali for sustaining the project

commercially and there is year round tourist flow in Tanakpur due to Purnagiri

temple, which is visited by lacs of pilgrims/tourists from all over the country.

' ',·

128

Letter from APD, IDIPT, UTDB to District Adventure Sports Officer for

identification of land (approx. 50 sqmt) around Tanakpur, instead of Baturi, as

suggested by District Administration.

-crITTITTiAT ~ ~ q~c~ ~xcFiT R)-q1m ~ ~

(rroiefto#o ~ - f!R -ro 2033, ffelfT}

'3rnxl'(\'1°"5m ovl. of Utta.rakhand l:fO ~ B1Tit<ITTT ~ ~. f'rm 3TTO~O~OWO ~

Uttarakha nd Uimpig ':Hcm,v~r:!

1TiT k, ~- 248003 .

l!iFf: 91-135-2559985, m: s1-135-2s59985

Tftrq):.2..1.9.7f-10 /izo~o~o / (~o~o~o1fioiro) / 179 / 2015-16

xfcIT -if, ~ ~ ~ ~/ ~ ~ ffi,f ~ ~, ~,

,fchm:- uR1lG .)-~/~ ~ cf>'T ~ 1fcFf ffi cfi ~ ~,

~:- 2660 / 2-10-ADB/IDIPT /179/2015-16, Dated 24/6/2015

~.

1804 /2-10-ADB/IDIPT/179/2014-15, Dated 21/11/2014

2776/2-10-ADB/IDIPT/179/2014-15, Dated 27/07/2015

2898 /2-10-ADB/IDIPT/179/2015-16, Dated 22/08/2015

460~ ~ ~-'r.fl'qlc@/2015-16 ~ 2 ~ 2015 ,

~-JIB: [email protected]

ITTfcp: ) ~-5ep.2015

~ ~ ~ * w -if~~ ·*~~~~~ 11 m 3lcl<Rf cfiWIT ~ ¥f % I ~o~o{owo cfi ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ cra-w cf 3Rf ~ cITT<if cfi ~ ~ ~ wfm ~ cnr 1T0<1 wm IJJ!WTT izcf ~ ~ ~ ~;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ff cfi ~ # ~ ~ cfi ~-wTI

Bero cfi q5,, i:/ ~ ~ cfi 1T5f ~ 08 ~ 2015 ~) &lxT ~ cfi ~ l:lx

~ ~ ~ ~ 3RBr ~ cfi 3ITT,(fIB cfi ITT -if ffi cnr -~ ~ t I .

3Kr:3l1W~!TTP~~cfi~~~cf>'T~~~~cnr (wr:rr 50 qif ~) 'r.fo/f qJX ·3ffi Jllq~i.Jqjcilj-<-llx infc;=r fcrwr cfi -;,fl, ~ 'qJX ~ cfi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cnr ~ er ~ qJX ~ cor· ~ ~ ~ cITT ~ ~ cfRFlT ~~,

~: '-'l4xlcfc'lljfil~

~:-

.Q d