environmental risk assessment process for bt crops bt 农作物的环境风险评估过程

40
1 Environmental Risk Assessment Process for Bt Crops Bt 农农农农农农农农农农农农 Tessa S. Milofsky, M.S. 泰泰 . 泰泰泰泰泰 , 泰泰 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs 农农农农农 农农农农农农农农

Upload: creola

Post on 18-Mar-2016

162 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Environmental Risk Assessment Process for Bt Crops Bt 农作物的环境风险评估过程. Tessa S. Milofsky, M.S. 泰莎. 米洛夫斯基, 硕士 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs 美国环保局 杀虫剂项目办公室. Outline of presentation 报告纲要. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

1

Environmental Risk Assessment Process for Bt Crops

Bt 农作物的环境风险评估过程Tessa S. Milofsky, M.S.泰莎 . 米洛夫斯基 , 硕士U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs美国环保局杀虫剂项目办公室

Page 2: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

2

Outline of presentation报告纲要 Describe environmental risk assessment (ERA)

process for insect-resistant Bt crops: 介绍抗虫 Bt 农作物环境风险评估 (ERA) 过程 :

– Terms 术语– Conceptual framework 基本概念– Data requirements 必要数据– Tiering 阶段

Summarize ERA for MON810 corn MON810 玉米环境风险评估概述

Page 3: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

3

Terms术语 Risk - the probability of adverse

effects resulting from exposure to an environmental agent or mixture of agents

风险 – 暴露于环境因素或混合因素所导致的负面影响的可能性 Hazard - the inherent toxicity of

the insecticidal protein 危害 –杀虫蛋白的内在毒性 Exposure - the concentration of

insecticidal protein encountered by an organism in the environment

暴露 – 某种生物在环境中接触到的杀虫蛋白的浓度Exposure 暴露

Hazard危害

High risk 高风险

Low ris 低风险

Page 4: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

4

Terms (cont.) 术语 ( 续 )

Risk Assessment - assessment of the probability that a harmful condition (hazard) will occur under a given set of conditions, using both hazard and exposure data

风险评估 – 利用危害性数据和暴露数据评测在一系列给定条件下 , 有害条件 ( 危害性 ) 发生的可能性 .

Page 5: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

5

Risk assessment process风险评估过程Hazard

Identification Measures of

Effects

RiskCharacterization

ExposureAssessment

Pro

blem

For

mul

atio

n问题

建立

Ris

k C

oncl

usio

n风险

结论

Exposure Characterization 暴露描述

Effects Characterization 效果描述

危害性识别 效果测试

暴露评估

风险描述

Page 6: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

6

Problem formulation 问题建立 Consider: 考虑

– Available information 可利用的信息– Overall management goals 总体的管理目标– Scientific and public concerns 科学和公众的考虑

Identify: 识别– Assessment endpoints 评估终点– Test species 测试物种– Test endpoints 测试终点– Tiers required 必要的阶段

Page 7: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

7

Risk assessment process风险评估过程Hazard

IdentificationMeasures of

Effects

RiskCharacterization

ExposureAssessment

Pro

blem

For

mul

atio

n

问题建

Ris

k C

oncl

usio

n

风险结

Exposure Characterization 暴露描述

Effects Characterization 效果描述

危害性识别 效果测试

暴露评估

风险描述

Page 8: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

8

Risk assessment at EPAEPA( 美国环保局 ) 风险评估 Assessment based on:

– Data submitted to the Agency– Advisory panel recommendations– Consultations with scientific experts – Public comments

评估基于 : – 递交于环保局的数据– 顾问团的建议– 与学术专家的咨询 – 公众的意见

Page 9: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

9

Data requirements必要的数据 Product characterization 产品特征 Human health 人类健康

– Toxicity 毒性– Allergenicity 过敏性

Environmental hazard 环境危害 Insect resistance management (Bt crops

only) 昆虫抗药性管理 ( 仅对 Bt 农作物 )

Page 10: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

10

Product characterization data requirements产品特征中的必要数据 Molecular characterization

– Characterization of inserted genes (active and inert)– Transformation system– Inheritance and stability of characteristics

Mode of action 分子特征

– 插入基因的特征 ( 有活性的和无活性的 )– 转录系统– 遗传和稳定性特征

作用模式

Page 11: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

11

Product characterization data requirements产品特征中的必要数据Test substance equivalenceProtein expression levelsAnalytical methods

Verify presence of intended protein in plantCheck for cross reactivity

测试物质的等效性蛋白表达水平分析方法

–确认目标蛋白存在于植物中–验证杂交

Page 12: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

12

Environmental hazard data requirements环境危害性中的必要数据 Toxicity to nontarget wildlife:

– Mammals – Birds – Fish – Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates– Earthworms– Plants

对非目标野生生物的毒性– 哺乳动物– 鸟类– 鱼类– 陆生水生无脊椎动物– 蚯蚓– 植物

Page 13: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

13

Environmental hazard data requirements环境危害性中的必要数据

Fate in environment: Soil fateHorizontal gene transferGene flow

Effect on threatened and endangered species在环境中的归趋 :

–在土壤中的归趋–横向基因转移–基因流动

对濒临灭绝物种的影响

Page 14: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

14

Terms ( 术语 )

Estimated environmental concentration (EEC) – estimated concentration within the ecosystem (usually used to describe concentrations in soil or water)

环境浓度估计值 (EEC) – 在生态系统中浓度的估计值 ( 通常用来描述在土壤和水中的浓度 ) High end exposure estimate (HEEE) - measured or estimated 90th percentile

of possible exposure concentrations (usually used to describe levels of expression in the insect-resistant plant)

高端暴露估计值 (HEEE) – 百分之九十可能暴露的测量或估计浓度 ( 通常用来描述在抗虫作物中的表达水平 ) Maximum hazard dose (MHD) – the dose chosen to represent an extreme

exposure scenario, calculated using the EEC or HEEE and incorporating an additional safety factor 最大危害剂量 (MHD) – 用来表达极端暴露的剂量 , 由 EEC 或 HEEE 和另外一个合并的安全因素来计算 .

Page 15: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

15

Tier I 第一级

Tier II第二级

Tier III第三级

Tier IV第四级

Tiered progression 阶梯状过程

Worst case scenario最差案例设想 Field conditions 田间条件

Effects seen at screening level?检测水平上的结果

Page 16: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

16Tier I

Tier II

Tier III

Tier IV

Tiered progression

•Full-field test •Long-term•Plant material•Actual field exposure (1x EEC/HEEE)•May have multiple locations•Census or look at sentinel orgs.

•Screening level test•Laboratory test•Short-term (30-day)•Microbe-derived protein with artificial diet•Uses representative NTOs•Exposure of 10x EEC/HEEE •Laboratory test

•Plant material alone or mixed with artificial diet•Exposure of 1-5x EEC/HEEE

•Semi-field test in green or screen house•Long-term (full-life cycle)•Plant material•Actual field exposure (1x EEC/HEEE)

Page 17: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

17

阶梯状过程

第一级第二级

第三级第四级•检测水平测试

•实验室测试•短期 (30- 天 )•由人工食物培育的微生物起源的蛋白•使用有代表性的 NTO•暴露于 10x EEC/HEEE

•实验室测试•单独植物材料或人工混合食物•暴露于 1-5x EEC/HEEE

•温室中的半田间测试•长期 ( 完整生命周期 )

•植物材料•暴露于 (1x EEC/HEEE)

•完整田间测试 •长期•植物材料•暴露于 (1x EEC/HEEE)

•不同地点•普查或在一些机构查询

Page 18: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

18

Tiering: an important message阶梯过程 : 重要的信息Adverse effect at maximum hazard dose (MHD)最大危害剂量 (MHD) 的副作用

≠ Unreasonable effect不合理作用

Adverse effect at estimated environmental concentration (EEC) or high end exposure estimate (HEEE)环境浓度估计值 (EEC) 或高端暴露估计值 (HEEE) 表现的副作用

= Potential for unreasonable effect潜在的不合理作用

Page 19: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

19

An example: MON810 corn例子 : MON810 玉米 Pesticide: Cry1Ab protein

– cry1Ab gene derived from Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki– Activity against European corn borer, southwestern corn borer, and corn

earworm Source of test substance:

– Plant material– Bacteria-produced purified protein

杀虫剂 : Cry1Ab 蛋白– cry1Ab 基因由 Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki 得来– 可抗欧洲玉米螟 , 西南玉米螟 , 和玉米田棉铃虫

测试物质来源– 植物材料– 细菌产生的纯蛋白

Page 20: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

20

Indicator Species Common Name Tier Test Sub. Dose ResultHippodamia convergens

Lady beetle I Bacteria-derived 20 ppm

NOAE

Chrysoperla carnea Green lacewing (larvae)

I Bacteria-derived 16.7 ppm

Papilio polyxenes Black swallowtail (larvae)

II Corn pollen 10,000 grains/cm2

Danaus plexippus Monarch (larvae) II Corn pollen 2,000 grain pollen/cm2

Brachymeria intermedia

Parasitic hymenoptera I Bacteria-derived 20 ppm

Folsomia candida and Xenylla grisea

Collembola I Bacteria-derived 200 ppm

II Corn leaf 50.6 ug/g dry tissue

Apis mellifera Honey bee (larvae) II Bacteria-derived 20 ppm

Honey bee (adult) I Bacteria-derived 20 ppm

Daphnia magna Water flea II Corn pollen 100 mg/L

Eisenia fetida Earthworm I Bacteria-derived 200 ppm

MON810 environmental toxicity data summary

tmilofsk
200 grains/cm2 maximum field exposure
Page 21: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

21

指示种 通用名称 阶段 测试物质 剂量 结果Hippodamia convergens

瓢虫 I 细菌起源 20 ppm

无副作用Chrysoperla carnea 绿草蛉 ( 卵 ) I 细菌起源 16.7 ppm

Papilio polyxenes 黑凤蝶 ( 卵 ) II 玉米花粉 10,000 粒 /cm2

Danaus plexippus 美国王斑蝶 (卵 ) II 玉米花粉 2,000 粒花粉 /cm2

Brachymeria intermedia

寄生蜂 I 细菌起源 20 ppm

Folsomia candida and Xenylla grisea

跳虫 I 细菌起源 200 ppm

II 玉米叶子 50.6 ug/g 干组织Apis mellifera 蜜蜂 ( 卵 ) II 细菌起源 20 ppm

蜜蜂 (成体 ) I 细菌起源 20 ppm

Daphnia magna 水蚤 II 玉米花粉 100 mg/L

Eisenia fetida 蚯蚓 I 细菌起源 200 ppm

MON810 环境毒性数据概述

tmilofsk
200 grains/cm2 maximum field exposure
Page 22: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

22

Indicator Species Common Name

Tier Test Sub. Dose Result

Mus musculus Mouse I Bacteria-derived 4000 mg/kg

NOAE

Colinus virginianus Northern bobwhite quail

II Corn grain 100,000 ppm

Gallus domesticus Broiler chicken II Corn grain 50-60% corn grain in diet

Ictalurus punctatus Catfish II Corn grain 50% corn grain in diet

Estuarine and marine animal I Waived: low potential for aquatic exposure to corn

Nontarget plant I Waived: Cry1Ab protein is nontoxic to plants

Fate in soil I Bacteria-derived DT50 8.3 d, DT90 33 d

II Whole plant DT50 1.6 d, DT90 15 d

MON810 environmental toxicity data summary (cont.)

Page 23: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

23

指示种 通用名称 阶段 测试物质 剂量 结果Mus musculus 小鼠 I 细菌起源 4000 mg/kg 无副作用Colinus virginianus 北方鹌鹑 II 玉米粒 100,000 ppm

Gallus domesticus 布罗勒鸡 II 玉米粒 食物中含 50-60% 玉米

Ictalurus punctatus 鲶鱼 II 玉米粒 食物中含 50%玉米淡水动物和海洋动物 I 未测试 : 由于在水中摄食玉米可能性低非目标植物 I 未测试 : 由于 Cry1Ab 蛋白 对植物没有毒性土壤中归趋 I 细菌起源 DT50 8.3 d, DT90 33 d

II 全植物 DT50 1.6 d, DT90 15 d

MON810 环境毒性数据概述 ( 续 )

Page 24: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

24

Other environmental toxicity issues其他环境毒性问题Issue 问 题 Conclusion 结 论

Horizontal gene transfer横向基因转移(HGT

Cry1Ab gene not expressed by a bacterial promoter in MON810 corn; if transferred to bacteria the gene would not be expressedExperiments conducted to assess the likelihood of HGT have not detected gene transfer under typical field conditionsNo significant risk of HGT with MON810 corn在 MON810 玉米中 , Cry1Ab 基因不能被细菌的启动子启动表达 ; 如果转化到细菌中这个基因就不能表达 .测试 HGT 可能性的试验还没有检测到在典型田间条件下的基因转移在 MON810 玉米上 HGT没有显著的风险

Page 25: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

25

Other environmental toxicity issues其他环境毒性问题Issue 问 题 Conclusion 结 论

Gene flow基因流动

Gene capture and expression of Bt cry toxins by wild or weedy relatives of corn was unlikely to occur in the U.S., its possessions, or territories在美国及周边地区 , 野生玉米或与玉米有亲缘关系的野草中 Bt cry 毒素的基因捕获和表达发生的可能性低

Endangered and threatened species considerations对濒危物种的影响

No overlap with corn cultivation and endangered lepidopteran breeding habitatsNontarget data support conclusion that MON810 corn would have no adverse effect on endangered and/or threatened species玉米的耕作地与濒临灭绝的鳞翅目昆虫的栖息地并没有重叠区非目标数据支持以下结论 :MON810 玉米对濒危物种没有副作用

Page 26: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

26

Risk assessment process风险评估过程Hazard

IdentificationMeasures of

Effects

RiskCharacterization

ExposureAssessment

Pro

blem

For

mul

atio

n

问题建

Ris

k C

oncl

usio

n

风险结

Exposure Characterization 暴露描述

Effects Characterization 效果描述

危害性识别 效果测试

暴露评估

风险描述

Page 27: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

27

Risk characterization风险描述 Low probability of harm due to source of toxin and history of safe use No adverse effects at Tier I and Tier II test levels Low probability of risk to endangered species, due to pest biology,

distribution, and exposure potential No observed adverse effects on population abundance in field census

低危害率归因于毒素的来源和安全使用的历史 . 第一第二测试阶段没有副作用 . 对濒危物种的低风险率归因于害虫的生物学特性 , 害虫分布和害虫的暴露潜在可能性 . 在田间普查中没有观察到对种群的丰度有负面作用 .

Page 28: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

28

Risk conclusion风险结论 This assessment finds no hazard to the environment

from cultivation of MON810 corn for a time-limited registration period

Supplemental long term effects studies would provide added weight to support the Agency’s conclusions

这一评估在一定的注册时间期限内并没有发现MON810 玉米的耕作对环境有危害作用 .

补充的长期效果研究将对环保局的结论提供更加有力的支持 .

Page 29: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

29

Post-registration data requirements for MON810

Long-term soil fate study (Tier II)– Used to evaluate potential adverse effects on soil organisms

Long-term field study (Tier IV)– Used to evaluate potential adverse effects on nontarget

invertebrates in a corn agroecosystem

Study Type Tier Test Sub. Dose Result

Fate in soil II Corn plant Field exposureNOAE

Field study IV Corn plant Field exposure

Page 30: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

30

注册期限后 MON810 的必需数据 长期土壤归趋研究 ( 阶段 II)

– 用来评价对土壤中生物的潜在毒副作用 长期农田实验 ( 阶段 IV)

– 用来评价对玉米田农业生态系统中的非目标生物的潜在毒副作用研究类型 阶段 测试物质 剂量 结果

土壤归趋 II 玉米植株 田间暴露无副作用田间实验 IV 玉米植株 田间暴露

Page 31: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

31

Why have we required field studies for Bt crops?为什么需要 Bt农作物的田间研究 ?

Advisory panels have stated the following:– Field evaluations should be conducted to determine the impact of insect-

resistant crops on nontarget organisms– Field studies (are) the most direct way to assess nontarget impact– Community-level interactions cannot be easily measured in laboratory

experiment– Laboratory tests may not fully represent the level or form of harm that may

occur in the field 顾问团有如下声明 :

– 田间评价应可确定抗虫作物对非目标生物的影响 .– 田间研究是评价这种影响的最直接的方法 .– 实验室中的实验很难测出群落水平的相互影响 .– 实验室测试不能完全代表农田中发生的危害水平或危害形式 .

Page 32: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

32

Limitations of Tier IV full-field studies第四阶段田间实验的局限性 Full-field studies (census) may result in significant within-plot

variation 田间研究 ( 普查 )会导致显著的土地内变化 Difficult to: 很难

– identify useful hypothesis 鉴别有用的假设– prove hypotheses 证明假设– compare/contrast treatments with meaningful controls in field 对比处理组和对照组

Page 33: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

33

Tier IV full-field study: sampling canopy-dwelling invertebrates第四阶段 - 田间实验 : 林间生活的无脊椎动物取样

Whole plant survey全植物调查

Flying insect trap飞虫捕捉器

Page 34: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

34

Tier IV full-field study: sampling surface-dwelling invertebrates第四阶段 - 田间实验 : 地表生活的无脊椎动物取样

Rove beetle隐翅虫

Carabid beetle步行虫

Pitfall trap for ground-dwelling invertebrates土地上生活的无脊椎动物陷阱

Page 35: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

35

What are the alternatives?其他选择 Follow the tier progression: I→II→ III→IV Require higher-tier (Tiers III & IV) testing only when lower-tier

tests indicate potential risk If higher-tier testing is required, investigate Tier III semi-field

level alternatives

按着阶梯状过程 : I→II→ III→IV 仅当低阶段测试表明有潜在的风险时 ,才需进行高阶段 (第三第四阶段 ) 测试 . 如果高阶段测试是必须的 ,那么第三阶段半田间调查是可选择的

tmilofsk
Trigger required
Page 36: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

36

Why might Tier III semi-field tests be a better option than Tier IV full-field tests?为什么第三阶段半田间测试相对于第四阶段田间测试可能是更好的选择 ?

Guaranteed exposure Higher likelihood of measuring effects, because test system is

confined Can readily relate results to those obtained in laboratory Can introduce laboratory-reared, or field-collected individuals Can regulate number of pests 暴露是有保证的 由于测试系统是有限的 , 所以得到结果的可能性更高 可以更好的和实验室得到的结果联系起来 可以引进实验室缺少的或只能在田间收集的个体 可以更好的控制害虫的数目

Page 37: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

37

Why might Tier III semi-field tests be a better option than Tier IV full-field tests?为什么第三阶段半田间测试相对于第四阶段田间测试可能是更好的选择 ?

Greater number of replicates possible Can be compared with other treatments Con of Tier III tests Difficult to design

繁殖的可能性更高 可以和其他实验组比较 第三阶段的缺陷 很难设计

Page 38: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

38

Tier III semi-field study: litter bag method第三阶段半田间实验 : 小袋法

Page 39: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

39

A take-home message重点总结

Risk assessment is always a dynamic process

风险评估往往是个动态的过程 .

Page 40: Environmental Risk Assessment Process for  Bt  Crops Bt  农作物的环境风险评估过程

40