eor en general

7/21/2019 EOR en General

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eor-en-general 1/32

OIL RECOVERY

Primary recovery, using only the natural

energy of reservoirs, typically recovers up to50% of OOIP (average 19%).

Secondary recovery involves adding energyto the natural system by injecting water to

maintain pressure and displace oil (also knownas waterflood ). Typical recoveries are 25-45%OIP after primary recovery (average 32%).

Tertiary recovery includes all other methodsused to increase the amount of oil recovered.

Typical recoveries are 5-20% of OIP after primary and secondary recovery (average13%).

Secondary and tertiary recovery are together

referred to as enhanced oil recovery (EOR).

19% + 26% =(100-19) x 32% + 7% =(100-45)x13% = 52%

TERTIARYSECONDARYPRIMARY

} EOR

TOTAL



PRIMARY AND SECONDARY RECOVERY

After primary and secondary recovery

(waterflood) oil remains in the reservoir as:

• uncontacted (unswept) oil (So = 1 - Swi)

• partially removed oil (1 - Swi < So > Soi)

• residual oil (So = Soi)

Uncontacted oil remains because thevolumetric sweep efficiency, including bothareal and vertical sweep efficiency, is never 100%.

Sweep efficiency depends on geology(permeability anisotropy and inhomogeneity)and mobility ratio (density and viscosity).Viscous fingering can seriously reduce sweepefficiency.

Vertical sweep efficiency is strongly influencedby geology (reservoir stratification).



IMMISCIBLE DISPLACEMENT

Most oil and gas production (primary and

secondary recovery) relies on the process of immiscible displacement of fluids in thereservoir.

Primary recovery uses the natural energy of

the reservoir to displace oil and/or gas. Themechanisms include:

- gas cap drive (expansion of the gas phase)- solution gas drive (exsolution of solution gas)- bottom water drive (aquifer displacement)

Secondary recovery (waterflooding) usesinjected water to displace hydrocarbons.

We will discuss waterflooding as an example

of the immiscible displacement process whereone fluid displaces another in the reservoir.



WATERFLOODING

In a waterflood, water is injected in a well or

pattern of wells to displace oil towards aproducer.

Initially, oil alone is produced as the part of thereservoir at the irreducible water saturation is

swept.

When the leading edge of the capillarytransition zone reaches the producer breakthrough occurs (the first appearance of water in the produced fluids).

After breakthrough, both oil and water areproduced and the watercut increasesprogressively.

Eventually the trailing edge of the capillaryzone reaches the producer and only water isproduced.



DISPLACEMENT PROCESS



WELL PATTERNS

Regular patterns of wells are used to sweep

the entire area of a reservoir with a waterflood.

INVERTED NINE SPOT INVERTED SEVEN SPOT

FOUR SPOT FIVE SPOT

DIRECT LINE DRIVE STAGGERED LINE DRIVE

SEVEN SPOT NINE SPOT



VISCOUS FINGERING

The mechanics of displacing one fluid with

another are relatively simple if the displaced fluid (oil) has a tendency to flow faster thanthe displacing fluid (water).

Under these circumstances, there is no

tendency for the displaced fluid to beovertaken by the displacing fluid and the fluid-fluid (oil-water) interface is stable.

If the displacing fluid has a tendency to movefaster than the displaced fluid, the fluid-fluid

interface is unstable. Tongues of displacingfluid propagate at the interface. This process iscalled viscous fingering.

MOBILITY



MOBILITY

The mechanics of displacement of one fluid

with another are controlled by differences inthe ratio of effective permeability and viscosity

(k / µ).

The specific discharge (flow per unit cross

sectional area) for each fluid phase dependson k / µ . This is called the fluid mobility (λ ):

λλ λ λ w = kw /µµµµw

λλ λ λ o = ko /µµµµo

Mobility controls the relative ease with whichfluids can flow through a porous medium.

Because the relative permeabilities to oil, kro,and water, krw, depend on the fluid saturations(So = 1 - Sw and Sw = 1 - So), mobility also is astrong function of saturation.



MOBILITY RATIO

The mobility ratio is expressed as:

M = λλ λ λ w / λλ λ λ o

In ideal displacement, there is a sharp

transition from residual oil saturation (Soi) tomaximum oil saturation (1 - Swi) at the oil-water interface.

Ahead of the interface, oil alone is flowing at

the end-point mobility λ o’ = ko

’/µo. Behind the

interface, water alone is flowing at the end-

point mobility λ w’ = kw

’/µw.

Ideal displacement is the most favourable conditionfor production but only occurs if the end-point

mobility ratio is less than or equal to unity.

M’ = λλ λ λ w’ / λλ λ λ o

’



IDEAL DISPLACEMENT

If the mobility ratio is less than or equal to one,

oil can flow at a rate greater than or equal tothat of water and is pushed ahead by the water bank in a piston-like fashion.

The moveable oil volume (MOV) is given by:

MOV = (1 - Soi - Swi).PV

where PV is the pore volume. For a waterflood,the volume of oil recovered is exactly equal tothe volume of water injected.

Swi

1 - Soi



NON-IDEAL DISPLACEMENT (1)

Under most circumstances, water is found to be

more mobile than oil. As a result, tongues of water bypass the oil leading to much less favourable

saturation profiles.

Some distance ahead of the water front, oil alone

flows at the end-point mobility λ o’ = ko

’/µo.

At some point nearer the water front there is a sharp

change in water saturation called the shock front .

Behind the shock front there is a transition zone

where both water and oil flow.

At the end of the transition zone, water alone is

flowing at the end-point mobility λ w’ = kw

’/µw.

When the shock front reaches the production well

there is a sharp increase in watercut. This event iscalled breakthrough.



NON-IDEAL DISPLACEMENT (2)

In contrast to the ideal displacement case, at

breakthrough, only a fraction of the MOV hasbeen recovered.

Addition water injection is required to recover the moveable oil. Several (5 or 6) MOV’s of

water may be needed to displace a singleMOV of oil.

The diagram shows two saturation profiles with

the shock front to the right. At breakthrough,the shaded area represents moveable oil thatremains between the injector and producer.

1 - Soi

Swi



AREAL SWEEP EFFICIENCY

When oil is produced from patterns of injectors

and producers , the flow is such that only partof the area is swept at breakthrough.

The expansion of the waterbank is initiallyradial from the injector but eventually is

focused at the producer.

The pattern is illustrated for a direct line driveat a mobility ratio of unity. At breakthrough aconsiderable area of the reservoir is unswept.



MOBILITY RATIO AND SWEEP EFFICIENCY

Mobility ratio has a strong influence on areal

sweep efficiency at breakthrough. For five-spotpatterns, areal sweep efficiency (ASE) atbreakthrough is over 95% for mobility ratiosless than 0.2. At M = 1.0, ASE = 67% and at M=10, ASE = 50%.

Low M

High M



ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY

The objective of EOR is to economically

increase displacement efficiency. The keyfactor is the mobility ratio, M:

M = λλ λ λ w / λλ λ λ o = [ krw(Sw) / µµµµw ] / [ kro(So) / µµµµo ]

Mobility ratio is a function of viscosity andrelative permeability, which in turn depends onsaturation.

EOR involves mobility control of various kindsthat can:

• change oil and water viscosities• change interfacial tensions

• change oil and water saturations

There are four principal groups of EOR

technologies available:• thermal EOR

• miscible EOR

• chemical EOR

• microbial EOR



THERMAL EOR

The principle of thermal EOR is that heat

increases the mobility of oil by reducing theviscosity.

M = λ w / λλ λ λ o = [ krw(Sw) / µw ] / [ kro(So) / µµµµo ]

Oil mobility is increased relative to that of water and the mobility ratio is reduced allowing morefavourable displacement.

Four thermal recovery methods have beeninvestigated:

• cyclic steam injection

• steamflood

• fireflood

• microwave heating

Thermal methods are generally used in heavyoils rich in high molecular weight aromaticsand asphaltenes. The principal difficulty inextracting such oils is the very high viscosity.



CYCLIC STEAM INJECTION

Cyclic steam injection or huff and puff or

steam soak involves alternating injection of high quality steam and production of oil andcondensed steam from the same well .

Well are injected with slugs of steam at very

high rates (millions of kilograms) for a shortperiod of time (typically 10 days).

The wells are then allowed to "soak" for afurther period of days (5 to 10) and then oil isproduced for 100 to 200 days (until the

production rate is unacceptable).

The process is then repeated. When thewatercut becomes too high or the reservoir pressure too low for another production cycle,

pools are often converted to a full steamflood.

Cyclic steam injection is the most successfulrecovery method to date for Canadian heavyoil reserves.



STEAMFLOOD

Steamflooding, also known as steam drive, involvescontinuous injection of steam to create a steam bank in thereservoir.

A pattern of injectors and producers are used in the same wayas a conventional waterflood.

Steamflood uses much more steam than cyclic injection andthe heat balance or energy balance is critical. If crude oil is

burned to generate the steam, in theory 1 m3 of crude oilgenerates 12 m

3of steam. In practice, the thermal efficiency is

closer to 3:1.

Steam costs are very high and can amount to up to 50% of thevalue of the produced oil.

Steamflooding has three actions that improve the mobility ratioin the reservoir:

• heat reduces oil viscosity

• thermal expansion of oil helps to free it from thereservoir matrix.

• light hydrocarbon fractions are vaporized at the heat

front and move ahead of the steam bank acting as a"natural miscible flood".

The longest running and most successful steamflood wasconducted in the Peace River oil sands in northern Alberta.



FIREFLOOD

Fireflooding or in-situ combustion provides thermal energy toreduce viscosity by burning crude oil in the reservoir. Themethod requires a relatively high permeability reservoir.

A heater or igniter is lowered down the well to initiate thefireflood. Oxygen or air is injected continuously to maintaincombustion and move the front forward. Water may also beinjected to provide additional steam (wet combustion).

Fireflooding has three actions in the reservoir:

• heat reduces oil viscosity

• steam is generated in-situ to provide a component of steam drive

• combustion gases and injected gases provide acomponent of gas drive.

In forward fireflood, oil burns, water is turned to steam in thecombustion zone. The lighter hydrocarbon fraction is vaporizedand coke is left in the reservoir after combustion.

If the reservoir is thin, unconsolidated and pressure is low,conventional waterflooding is ineffective and produces high

sandcuts. Steamflooding is also ineffective in thin reservoirsbecause of high heat losses. In these circumstances, firefloodtends to be a last resort EOR method for heavy, viscouscrudes.



REVERSE COMBUSTION

Reverse combustion is a good idea that has yet to prove itself.

Instead of igniting the oil in the injector, the producer is ignitedand the combustion front moves out radially towards theoxygen supply (the injector). The displaced fluids movetowards the producer through hot sand so the oil is effectivelyupgraded in situ.

If reverse combustion could be developed successfully it could

revolutionize the production of heavy, viscous crude oils inwestern Canada.

One major problem is spontaneous ignition of the oil near theinjector. This cuts off oxygen to the combustion front and thesystem reverts to forward combustion.

MICROWAVE HEATING

Another novel idea is the use of microwaves as a source of heat. EM waves are generated with downhole equipment toheat the oil and reduce viscosity.

The technique is experimental and penetration distances arecurrently too short for effective economic production.



MISCIBLE EOR

Miscible flooding works on the principle that some fluids aremiscible with crude oil (methane, ethane, CO2 etc) and can beused to displace oil with no capillary resistance.

First contact miscible means that the injected fluids mix withreservoir fluids in all proportions as a single fluid phase. CO2 isnot strictly miscible. It has a vapour pressure very close to thewet gases and is soluble in oil at high pressures. CO2 takestime to mix (dynamically miscible).

When oil is mixed with a miscible fluid, there are no interfacialtensions or capillary forces and no interface exists.

The effect of adding a miscible fluid to the reservoir is to "swell"the oil and increase So and hence kro.

An additional benefit of miscible hydrocarbon gases and CO2 isthat they dissolve in oil to lower its viscosity, µo.

M = λ w / λλ λ λ o = [ krw(Sw) / µw ] / [ kro(So) / µµµµo ]

These two factors combine in miscible flooding to improve themobility ratio by increasing the mobility of the oil phase.

To date, miscible flooding is the only economically proventertiary recovery method applied to "normal oils" in Canada.



HYDROCARBON SOLVENT FLOODS

Several hydrocarbon fluids are used in miscible floods:

• lean gas injection or vaporizing gas drive - C

2 to C

6injected relatively high pressure. The light gas stripsintermediate molecular weight hydrocarbons and formsa miscible back.

• Enriched gas injection or condensing gas drive - theinjected gas condenses intermediates to form themiscible back.

• LPG slug (propane and butane) injection miscible slugdriven by either gas and/or water.

Miscible hydrocarbon flooding is not without problems:

• Miscible banks are unstable. Solvents are less denseand less viscous than oil and are subject to channelingand upward migration due to gravity effects (work well inpinnacle reefs).

• Solvent banks tend to breakdown and become lesseffective due to inhomogeneity in the reservoir.

Golden Spike is an example of a successful miscible flood. Thebrief history of the pool is:

• 1949 - discovery, no gas cap, no bottom water.

• 1953 - gas injection for pressure maintenance created

secondary gas cap• 1964 - injected 7% HCPV LPG slug + gas and water

• 1972 - asymmetric GOC up to 40 m difference across pool

• 1973 - detailed geology shows low perm zones break up theLPG slug

• 4.8 million m3 solvent recovered 1.6 million m

3 oil 67% OOIP



CYCLIC CARBON DIOXIDE INJECTION

This miscible technique is analogous to cyclic steam injection.The "soak" period is advantageous because CO2 is not firstcontact miscible with oil (at normal reservoir pressures) and ittakes time for the gas to swell the oil and reduce viscosity:

• The well is injected with CO2 for a period of 20 to 100hours.

• A soak period of 5 to 20 days is allowed for the CO2 toact.

• A production period of several weeks from the samewell follows when evolution of CO2 may provideadditional solution gas drive energy.

There are some disadvantages:

• Cyclic carbon dioxide stimulation performance drops of rapidly with number of cycles.

• If natural sources of CO2 are not available, it isexpensive to generate.

• CO2 is corrosive which adds capital costs to recoveryoperations.

• It is necessary to separate produced CO2 from

hydrocarbon gases.

Typically 900 to 2200 m3 of CO2 are required to produce 1 m

3

of additional oil. This added cost can be a very significantfraction of the value of the oil (up to 70%).



CARBON DIOXIDE FLOODING

In CO2 flooding a conventional pattern of

injectors and producers is used.

Very large volumes of CO2 are required(injection volumes are 15% HCPV or greater).

The most efficient use of CO2 is achievedwhen it is injected in alternation with water.CO2 injected alone is very mobile and tends tobypass the oil rather than dissolving in it.

This problem arises especially at lower

pressures when the dynamic miscibilitycharacteristics require the greatest amount of contact time for solution. At low pressures,miscibility is lost completely. There is,therefore, a minimum pressure requirement for

miscible CO2 flooding.

The CO2 strips light molecules from oil andforms a miscible bank composed of CO2 andenriched light gas.



NITROGEN FLOODING

In certain circumstances, nitrogen can be a

substitute for carbon dioxide in miscible floods.

The N2 is miscible with oil at high pressure anddissolves to swell the oil and reduce viscosity.

The method is used in deep reservoirs since

the miscibility pressure for nitrogen is inexcess of 3500 kPa.

Light oils with low Bo and low methane are thebest candidates to accept nitrogen. The N2

vaporizes light hydrocarbons and forms anenriched miscible bank as the interfacialtension is reduced to zero.

Water is commonly used as a chase fluid tomitigate problems with high gas mobility.

Nitrogen is relatively cheap, non-corrosive andcan be readily extracted from the atmosphere.



CHEMICAL EOR

Chemical EOR involves a variety of techniques

used to mainly to modify the mobility of theaqueous phase during displacement.

In polymer flooding , the objective is to reducethe mobility of the aqueous displacing phase

by increasing the viscosity:

M = λλ λ λ w / λ o = [ krw(Sw) / µµµµw ] / [ kro(So) / µo ]

The overall result is a reduced, and hencemore favourable, mobility ratio.

Surfactants have a different effect. Insurfactant or micellar floods these molecules"scrub" residual oil from pores by reducinginterfacial tensions and creating emulsions or

dispersions of hydrocarbon in the aqueousphase. The action is to release oil by reducing,Soi, and hence increase the moveable oilvolume (MOV).



POLYMER FLOODING

In polymer flooding, the water is "thickened" by the addition of water soluble polymers.

Some of the polymers that have been tried are:

• PAC - synthetic polyacrylates (limited use).

• PAM - synthetic polyacrylamides (popular).

• Celluloses - starches from wastes (susceptible to attackby enzymes).

• XG - Xanthan Gum - a natural carbohydrate (popular).

The polymer flood process is:

• Injection of polymer slug

• Injection of freshwater "pad" to protect the slug frombrine / formation water

• Injection of brine / formation water chase fluid

The technique is most suitable for high permeability sandstonereservoirs (since polymer flooding reduces water mobility)where high watercuts have developed in the late stages of secondary waterflooding. In such fields, disposal of producedbrines can present an insurmountable economic and

environmental problem.

Polymer flooding is being adopted at an earlier stage inwaterfloods because of its capability to control breakthroughand increase areal sweep efficiency.



MICELLAR FLOODING

Natural surfactants in reservoirs create emulsions or oil-in-water dispersions with viscosities similar to the aqueous phaseused to displace oil.

These "solubilizers" of hydrocarbon are polar surfactantmolecules (like detergents) called micelles. One end of themolecule is hydrophilic and attracts water, the other end ishydrophobic and attracts hydrocarbons. The overall effect is todrag residual oil into an emulsion or dispersion with the

aqueous fluid.

Surfactants can also modify the balance of adhesive andcohesive forces in reservoirs and hence change the wettabilityfrom water wet to oil wet or vice versa.

Both alkaline flooding and microbial recovery methods involve

the creation of in-situ surfactants.

A micellar slug injected into a reservoir after waterflooding actsas an underground detergent or "scrubber" mobilizing residualoil by reducing the residual oil saturation. In effect, themoveable oil volume (MOV) is increased.

Micellar slugs are usually chased by polymer floods to controlmobility and reduce the tendency for channelling of water because of adverse mobility ratios. The main saving is areduction in the volume of water that must be produced withthe oil emulsion or dispersion.



ALKALINE FLOODING

Alkaline or caustic flooding involves injection

of NaOH or KOH into the reservoir. Thesechemicals react with organic acids in-situ toproduce soap-like surfactants. This process isnot well understood in any quantitative way.

The technique has yet to establish itself andonly a limited number of field trials have beenundertaken with limited success. BecauseNaOH and KOH are cheap and readilyavailable, caustic flooding is the leastexpensive EOR process.

Some recent successes suggest that themethod may have considerable potentialbecause of its significant cost advantage.

In common with micellar floods, alkaline floodsare chased with a polymer pad for mobilitycontrol. For this reason only highly permeablereservoirs are candidates for the technique.



MICROBIAL EOR

Microbial methods are new and experimental areas

of research.

The principle is that micro-organisms together with asource of nutrients are injected into reservoirs where

they produce H2, CO2 and surfactants that help tomobilize oil.

Micro-organisms under consideration for use inmicrobial EOR include: fungi, algae, protozoa,

viruses, aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

A variety of natural populations of microbes exist in

oil reservoirs where some use the oil as a substrate(eat oil). Among other things, micro-organisms are

responsible for:

• bacterial formation plugging

• H2S generation (bacterial souring)

• CO2 generation

Bacterial plugging can be used to advantage to

force displacing fluids through unswept areas.



CYCLIC MICROBIAL RECOVERY

Cyclic microbial recovery is an experimental

single-well technique similar to cyclic steamand cyclic CO2 simulation.

There is a short (hours) injection period whenmicro-organisms and nutrients (molasses,oxygen, etc.) are injected.

Next the wells are shut-in for an incubationperiods when CO2 and surfactants areproduced as metabolic products. This periodmay be days or weeks.

Finally, the production phase begins andextents over a period of weeks or months.When production declines, another phase of injection is started.

Temperature seems to be an important factor in microbial recovery and the choice of micro-organism is critical. Organisms may prove tobe specific to each individual reservoir.



MICROBIAL FLOODING

In microbial flooding a conventional pattern of

injectors and producers is employed.

A preflush by water normally precedes themicrobial flood, which is primarily aimed atrecovering residual oil.

The bank of micro-organisms and nutrients arefollowed by water as a chase fluid to sweepthrough the reservoir.

Again the action expected of the microbes is to

oxidize the oil to fatty acids (surfactants) andto generate miscible gases that contact theresidual oil to release it. The produced CO2

and biomass act to displace the oil.

A major obstacle to microbial methods is theavailability of micro-organisms that are viableunder extreme conditions of pH, pressure andtemperature.

eor en general

Documents