eparticipation in slovenian e government delakorda
DESCRIPTION
e-participation inSlovenia e-governmentTRANSCRIPT
Information and Communication Technologies: from Modern to Information Society
Univerzitetno in raziskovalno središče Novo mesto 19.-20. september 2008
e-PARTICIPATION IN e-PARTICIPATION IN SLOVENIAN e-GOVERNMENTSLOVENIAN e-GOVERNMENT
Simon Delakorda(Institute for Electronic Participation - INePA)
Empirical Facts
Explanation Hypotheses
Slovene e-government state of the art in the area of e-Participation / e-Democracy is a result of:
Implementation deficit
Development deficit
Methodology
Slovene government ministries web sites analysis (e-democracy tools typology; Trechsel, 2003)
Specific case studies analysis E-government policy documents analysis
(typology of e-democracy; Hagen, 1996) Informal correspondence with government
officials
Results I. - Implementation deficit
Earlier e-government strategies favoured electronic democratization concept (strengthening representative democracy)
E-government strategy 2006: Republic of Slovenia among 10 most developed e-democracies in the world
Conceptual shift towards participatory and direct democracy (e-pools, e-consultations, e-referendum etc.)
e-Democracy neglected by implementation plans
Results II. - Development deficit
all government ministries provided public information e-access
8 ministries out of fifteen offered an e-mail address for sending comments on draft legislation
Little success with moderated on-line forums Web 2.0 applications rarely available E-Democracy web 1.0 portal not yet finalized
Interpretation
Implementation and development deficit of e-Participation are results of a technocratic understanding of political democracy and citizenship:
e-Participation as technological issue e-Participation as legal issue Top down controlled e-participation in order to
secure objective and rational support for political elites interest
Possible solutions
Adoption of Government Law on public participation and co-decision (e-participation regulation):
− Political citizens are not e-government consumers− Political freedom should mean that citizens have the
democratic right and instruments to reject government and political elites decisions without being sanctioned
Integration of knowledge and resources between public administration and civil society
Technology reorientation towards web 2.0 for strengthening active citizenship communities
Electronic strong democracy (Grossman, 1995)
THANK YOU!THANK YOU!
[email protected] [email protected]
Institute for Electronic Participation (INePA)Institute for Electronic Participation (INePA)Povšetova ulica 37Povšetova ulica 37
1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaTel.:+386 41 365 529Tel.:+386 41 365 529 http://www.inepa.sihttp://www.inepa.si