2014/5/1 Ernest Gellner | Nationalism Studies

http://nationalismstudies.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/ernest-gellner-2/ 1/7

Nationalism Studies

Monitoring the Changing World

Feeds: Posts Comments

Ernest Gellner

October 9, 2013 by mdcuff3

Ernest Gellner is widely seen as one of the most important theorists in the study of nationalism. Gellner was introduced to nationalism and identity politics during his youth. As a Jewish Czech,Gellner was forced to leave his home in 1939, fleeing Prague for England in the wake of Hitler’stakeover of Czechoslovakia. Upon his return to Prague after the war, he found a much changedcity that had lost most of its multiculturalism. Not feeling at home, Gellner went back to Englandto pursue an academic career. From his experience as an ‘outsider’, he develops his first thoughtson identity politics and nationalism. For Gellner, nationalism is the imposition of a high cultureon society replacing local, low cultures and most multiculturalism. His most prominent theoryon the origin of nationalism starts by regarding the transformation of society from an agrarian

2014/5/1 Ernest Gellner | Nationalism Studies

http://nationalismstudies.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/ernest-gellner-2/ 2/7

based economy and social structure to one centered around industrialism. For Gellner, societybefore industrialism, was vertically bound with over 80 percent of the population being peasantfarmers. There was strict boundaries between communities (fiefdoms) as well as between classes.

These separate communities while bound under the ‘state’ do not necessarily share commonlanguage, memories, myths, religion or ancestry. Peasants were born as farmers and died asfarmers with no possibilities of economic mobility or social advancement due to lack of astandardized education. Therefore, these communities did not wish to impose their language orculture on neighboring communities. There was also no imposition of a high culture due to alack of standardized education.

According to Gellner, this changes with the rise of industrialism. In industrial society the barriersbetween communities are broken due to a standardized, mass education which allows foreconomic and social mobility. Gellner notes that industrialization does not spread evenly amongall of the communities within the ‘state’. Therefore, individuals in the community whichindustrialized later lack the opportunities that those in the already industrialized communitypossess. According to Gellner, there are two possibilities, assimilation or lack of assimilation. Ifboth communities share language and culture, (‘ethnicity’) then assimilation is possible throughstandardized education. However, if there is not a shared ‘ethnicity’, then assimilation will notoccur but rather are excluded from society. In this case, Gellner argues that nationalism willemerge as the excluded ‘ethnicity’ pushes for political sovereignty.

Gellner believes that nationalism strives for one culture or ethnicity under one roof, or ‘state’. ForGellner, this is the most important principle of successful states. He argues that the worst case iswhen the ruler of a state is not a member of the ethnic majority within the boundaries of the state. In this case, Gellner states that nationalism will inevitably occur because members of the ‘nation’will want to strive for advancement by attempting to gain control of the state.

As one of the main protagonists in the study of nationalism, Gellner and his theory has come infor a fair bit of criticism. J.A. Hall mentions the main criticism: that Gellner’s argument is toofunctionalist. Meadwell also mentions several criticisms of Gellner. First that Gellner neverproves the nationalism is necessary for industrial society. In addition, Gellner says thatnationalism is only available to the dominated, yet this is clearly not always the case as the casestudies below will show.

Syria

One of the most covered and discussed current nationalist movements is taking place in Syria. The civil war in Syria is difficult to simplify with many factors involved including factions,deaths, international involvement and chemical weapons among others. However, Gellnerwould simplify the situation in Syria and the nationalist conflict there by looking at the ruler andthe ruled. When the current leader’s father, Hafiz al-Assad came into power in 1970, Syria wassplintered with the military being the dominant political force. Hafiz al-Assad was a member ofthe Ba’ath party at the time, a party largely made up of Alawites. Hafiz al-Assad and his son,Bashar, are both Alawites themselves, members of a relatively liberal sect of Islam. However, themajority of the population is made up of Arab Sunnis. Two articles from the BBC and theWashington Post help explain the ethnic breakdown in Syria.

2014/5/1 Ernest Gellner | Nationalism Studies

http://nationalismstudies.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/ernest-gellner-2/ 3/7

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18084964(http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18084964)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/08/27/the-one-map-that-shows-why-syria-is-so-complicated/(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/08/27/the-one-map-that-shows-why-syria-is-so-complicated/)

The map from the Washington Post web site shows the geographical breakdown of religious andethnic groups in Syria.

Hafiz al-Assad appointed mostly Alawites and members of his Ba’ath party to leadershippositions in the military, explaining the military’s commitment to Bashar al-Assad and the currentregime. While binding the military to the party and the ruling family, this limited advancementpossibilities for the Arab Sunni majority. The Alawites loyalty and can be seen in this clip fromthe BBC below.

2014/5/1 Ernest Gellner | Nationalism Studies

http://nationalismstudies.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/ernest-gellner-2/ 4/7

To Gellner this marks the worst case scenario mentioned above. The ruler is not of the ‘nation’which makes up a majority of the state but is rather of the minority ‘nation’. With a lack ofassimilation, Gellner argues that this will always lead to a homogenization process which we cansee during the current civil war.

Discussion questions:

In your opinion does Gellner’s argument do enough to explain the rise of nationalism in Syria?

Why didn’t the revolt and protests happen sooner since the country has been ruled by the Assadfamily since 1970?

China

Gellner claims that “the social organisation of agrarian society, however, is not at all favorable tothe nationalist principle, to the convergence of political and cultural units, and to thehomogeneity and school-transmitted nature of culture within each political unit (Gellner, 1983,38-39).” China is a complex country which, on some points, seems to break away from Gellner’sconception of an industrial nation. On the one hand, China has a state-run education system, hasmanaged to converge the national with the political and has experienced unprecedentedindustrial economic growth.

Yet, there is an argument to be made that the structure of Chinese society remains largely familialand rural. As well, the increasing income gap between the average Chinese citizen and membersof the elite class has led some to question whether Chinese society is returning to a pseudo-feudalistic structure. Thus, despite Gellner’s belief that the social makeup of an agrarian societyis incompatible with an industrial society, is it possible that China manages to successfullyincorporate elements of both?

http://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/08/feudalism-makes-a-comeback-in-china/278945/ (http://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/08/feudalism-makes-a-

0:00 / 2:38

Grim Determination in Assad Alawite Heartland

2014/5/1 Ernest Gellner | Nationalism Studies

http://nationalismstudies.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/ernest-gellner-2/ 5/7

comeback-in-china/278945/)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13945072 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13945072)

Rwanda

The country of Rwanda is a former colony of Belgium and a country recovering from majorinternal strife due to long-term discrimination between two of the country’s major ethnic groups,culminating in the 1994 Rwandan Genocide. Following the Berlin conference of 1884, Rwandawas assigned to German East Africa. Following WWI, Belgium took control of the colony,marking the beginning of a more direct colonial rule. Introducing large-scale projects inagriculture, education and public works, Rwanda enjoyed a period of industrialization.

The Germans and the Belgians both favoured Tutsi supremacy, despite them being only 15% ofthe population. In 1935 the Belgians issued identity cards labelling each individual by theirethnic group, either Hutu, Tutsi, Twa or naturalised. Previously a wealthy Hutu could becomehonorary Tutsi, the identity cards however prevented any movement between the classes. TheHutu population rebelled in the Revolution of 1959, killing a large number of Tutsi andestablishing an independent Hutu-led state in 1962. In 1990 the Tutsi-led Rwandan Patriotic Front(RPF) launched a civil war, leading to the culmination of the Rwandan Genocide, in which Hutuextremists killed approximately 500,000 – 1 million Tutsi.

A more detailed overview is given in this article:

http://www.globalissues.org/article/429/rwanda(http://www.globalissues.org/article/429/rwanda)

2014/5/1 Ernest Gellner | Nationalism Studies

http://nationalismstudies.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/ernest-gellner-2/ 6/7

Rwanda’s economy suffered greatly following the massacre but has since strengthened. Theestablishment of criminal courts to deal with the aftermath have led to years of relative peace. Atthe height of the crises some 2.1 million Rwandans were displaced by the crises, with some100,000 still remain abroad. The cessation clause came into effect on the 30th of June 2013 – itstates that a “refugee status should end if the circumstances which led to flight no longer exist inthe country of origin”.

More on this here:

http://www.unhcr.org/51cd7df06.html (http://www.unhcr.org/51cd7df06.html)

“The disastrous and tragic consequences in modern conditions, of the conjunction of economicsuperiority and cultural identifiability with political and military weakness, are too well-knownto require repetition. Sometimes a precarious and uneasy balance is maintained. The main pointis that the central power now finds itself in a very different situation, and subject to very differenttemptations and pressures from those which prevailed in the days of the agrarian division oflabor….Now the state has more interest in depriving the minority of its economic monopoliesand because of the minority’s visibility and wealth, it can buy off a great deal of discontent in thewider population by dispossessing and persecuting it; and so the inevitable happens.” Nationsand Nationalism, 2008 Blackwell Publishing, pp 101-102.

Discussion questions:

Do Gellner’s theories shed light on what happened in Rwanda in 1994?

What do Gellner’s theories have to offer for theorizing a future for Rwanda?

-This post has been authored by Matthew Cuff, Kirsten Gerrie and Gyða Fanney Guðjónsdóttir.

Posted in MSc in Nationalism Studies | Leave a Comment

Comments RSS

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

The MistyLook Theme.

Follow

Follow “Nationalism Studies”

2014/5/1 Ernest Gellner | Nationalism Studies

http://nationalismstudies.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/ernest-gellner-2/ 7/7

Powered by WordPress.com