Hammill Institute on Disabilities

Erratum: Operational Definitions and Learning Disabilities: An OverviewSource: Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Winter, 1992), p. 19Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1510561 .

Accessed: 13/06/2014 11:46

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

.

Sage Publications, Inc. and Hammill Institute on Disabilities are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,preserve and extend access to Learning Disability Quarterly.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 195.78.109.175 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:46:50 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

ties, 18, 423-427. Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1986). The future of

the LD field: Screening and diagnosis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 394-398.

Cone, T.E., Wilson, L.R., Bradley, C.M., & Reese, J.H. (1985). Characteristics of LD students in Iowa: An empirical investigation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 211-220.

Frankenberger, W., & Harper, J. (1987). States' crite- ria and procedures for identifying learning disabled children: A comparison of 1981/82 and 1985/86 guidelines. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 118-121.

Hammill, D.D. (1990). On defining learning disabili- ties: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74-84.

Holmes, C.T., & Matthews, K.M. (1984). The effects of nonpromotion on elementary and junior high school pupils. Review of Educational Research, 54, 225-236.

Indiana Department of Education, Division of Special Education. (1986). Learning disability definition and eligibility criteria: Guidelines for implemen- tation. Indianapolis: Indiana Special Education Ad- ministrators' Services.

Jastak, J.F., & Wilkinson, G.S. (1984). The Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates, Inc.

Kirk, S.A., & Elkins, J. (1975). Characteristics of chil- dren enrolled in Child Service Demonstration Cen- ters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 630-637.

McLeskey, J., & Grizzle, K. (in press). Grade retention of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children.

McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N.L. (1988). The impact of the LD Guidelines on the identification of stu- dents with learning disabilities in Indiana: Final report. Indianapolis: Indiana Department of Educa- tion, Division of Special Education.

McNutt, G. (1986). The status of learning disabilities in the states: Consensus or controversy? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 12-16.

Mercer, C., Hughes, C., & Mercer, A. (1985). Learn- ing disabilities definitions used by state education

departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 630-637.

Mercer, C., King-Sears, P., & Mercer, A. (1990). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 141-152.

National Advisory Committee on Handicapped Chil- dren. (1968). First annual report, Subcommittee on Education of the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Norman, C.A., & Zigmond, N. (1980). Characteris- tics of children labeled and served as learning dis- abled in school systems affiliated with Child Service Demonstration Centers. Journal of Learning Dis- abilities, 13, 16-21.

Shepard, L., & Smith, M.L. (1983). An evaluation of the identification of learning disabled students in Colorado. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 115- 127.

Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Dis- abilities, 22, 469-486.

Smith, M.L., & Shepard, L.A. (1987). What doesn't work: Explaining policies of retention in the early grades. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 129-134.

U.S. Department of Education (USDE), Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (1989). Eleventh annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Govern- ment Printing Office.

Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intel- ligence Scale for Children - Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

Woodcock, R. (1978). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoe- ducational Battery. Boston: Teaching Resources Corporation.

Requests for reprints should be addressed to: James McLeskey, Department of Curriculum and Teacher Education, Indiana University, 170 Smith Center, Bloomington, IN 47405.

Erratum

Volume 14, No. 4, Fall, 1991: p. 250, column 2, 1. 2 from bottom:

Corrected sentence reads:

"As mentioned, this constraint or inefficiency manifests itself in specific lower order pro- cessing (e.g., attention, phonological coding), specific processes of a higher order system (e.g., awareness and monitoring of attention resources, etc.) and/or processes that facili- tate the interaction between or coordination of lower and higher order processes."

Volume 15, Winter 1992 19

This content downloaded from 195.78.109.175 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:46:50 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions