essay tradition and originality

5

Click here to load reader

Upload: kathryn-tindall

Post on 01-Oct-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Foundation art

TRANSCRIPT

  • Oxfordshire School of Creative Arts, Assignment Brief Edexcel BTEC Level 3 Foundation Diploma in Art and Design (QCF)

    UNIT NO & NAME Unit 4: Information & Interpretation in Art and Design

    TITLE ESSAY: TRADITION & ORIGINALITY

    STAFF Martin Carrolchick and Chris Muir

    DEADLINE/HAND-IN Monday 6th January 2014

    ASSESSORS Martin Carrolchick et al

    TRADITION & ORIGINALITY

    No poet, no artist of any art, has his complete meaning alone. His significance, his appreciation is the appreciation of his relation to the dead poets and artists. You cannot value him alone; you must set him, for contrast and comparison, among the dead.

    (T.S. Eliot)

    In light of the lecture Tradition & Originality you will be aware of a brand of originality, endorsed by T.S. Eliot,

    that fuses the old and the new in pursuit of a more sophisticated, nuanced meaning.

    Eliots conception of originality is more interested in refreshing reinterpretation than novelty. Ultimately, this

    type of originality, reliant on the poets awareness of tradition, is superior to the more conventional idea of

    originality, not only because of its comprehensiveness, but also because its assumption that artistic meaning

    only emerges from contextualization affords us a reliable way to measure aesthetic value.

  • Oxfordshire School of Creative Arts, Assignment Brief Edexcel BTEC Level 3 Foundation Diploma in Art and Design (QCF)

    The Importance of Tradition

    Originality as Eliot envisions it is more persuasive than the OEDs definition partially because it is more

    comprehensive. Instances of true innovation free from tradition are far and few between. The invention of

    fire might be such an innovation, but little else matches that level of newness. Photography, for example, may

    seem like a groundbreaking innovation, but it actually takes root in pre-existing bodies of technical knowledge

    and, moreover, is aesthetically judged on principles established by other visual forms like painting. For all its

    newness, it could only have been invented with the help of the past, and it can only be valued relative to the

    past. Innovation is largely derivative of past progress. Even reactionary movements, like Dada and punk

    subculture, rely on tradition to give purpose to their rebellion. Very little, it seems, arises beyond the context

    of history and developing precedents.

    Eliots version of originality is also striking for its emphasis on the importance of contextualization. Tradition

    provides a context by which we can judge aesthetics separate from the immediate real-world contexts in

    which works are created. The implication of this reliance of works upon one another is salient: no art exists in

    a vacuum. The meaning and merit of an artwork only arise through its relationships to other artworks. Were

    we to disregard tradition, we would have no clear, objective way to deem one work more valuable than

    another. Nor would we be able to produce completely meaningful art in the first place, for as Eliot posits: No

    poet, no artist of any art, has his complete meaning alone. His significance, his appreciation is the

    appreciation of his relation to the dead poets and artists. You cannot value him alone; you must set him, for

    contrast and comparison, among the dead.

    These two diagrams describe different versions of the Museum of Modern Arts view of 20th Century Art. The first is based around the tradition that Cezanne influenced Matisse and Picasso and they, in turn, influenced post-war American Abstract expressionism (Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning). The second offers Marcel Duchamp as the central figure of influence leading to Andy Warhol and the contemporary artists of today

  • Oxfordshire School of Creative Arts, Assignment Brief Edexcel BTEC Level 3 Foundation Diploma in Art and Design (QCF)

    AIM

    Your aim is to write an illustrated essay that identifies a contemporary practitioner within your preferred field of the Creative Arts (Pathway) and present an argument for their work to be part of a tradition Your Objectives include

    To research examples of historical and contemporary practice that relate to your work

    To review the effect of significant contextual factors on the production of specific works in relation to your work

    To analyse and evaluate other artists and designers intentions

    To identify and develop your understanding of the critical context of your own interests and ideas within the subject.

    To identify books journal and magazine articles, exhibition catalogues, primary sources and internet sites etc that will be relevant to your subject.

    To look beyond simple, popular assumptions about art

    To present your report in a professional word-processed document

    To reference all secondary sources accurately within your final Report (blog or word-processed document)

    Materials Required

    Internet Access; OCVC Library; Visits to Museums and Galleries; Sketchbook/Notebook

    Recommended Research

    Author Title Unit

    Arnheim R Visual Thinking

    (University of California Press, 2004) ISBN 978-0520018716

    4

    Barnard M Fashion as Communication

    (Routledge 2002) ISBN 978-0415260183

    4

    Chipp H B Theories of Modern Art: A Source Book by Artists and Critics

    (University of California Press, 1992) ISBN 978-0520052567

    4

    Dormer P Design Since 1945

    (Thames & Hudson, 1993) ISBN 978-0500202613

    4

    Duby G and Daval J Sculpture: From Antiquity to the Present Day

    (Taschen, 2006) ISBN 978-3822850787

    4

    Fiell C and F Graphic Design Now

    (Taschen, 2005) ISBN 978-3822847787

    4

    Gauntlett D Media, Gender and Identity

    (Routledge, 2008) ISBN 978-0415396608

    4

    Harrison H and Wood

    P (editors)

    Art in Theory 1900-2000: An Anthology of Changing Ideas

    (Wiley-Blackwell, 2002) ISBN 978-0631227083

    4

    Hebdige D Hiding In The Light: On Images and Things

    (Routledge, 1989) ISBN 978-0415007375

    4

  • Oxfordshire School of Creative Arts, Assignment Brief Edexcel BTEC Level 3 Foundation Diploma in Art and Design (QCF)

    Howells R Visual Culture

    (Polity Press, 2003) ISBN 978-0745624129

    4

    Jodidio P Architecture Now

    (Taschen, 2009) ISBN 978-3836501934

    4

    Leighton T (editor) Art and the Moving Image: A Critical Reader

    (Tate, 2008) ISBN 978-1854376251

    4

    Monem N (editor) Contemporary Textiles: The Fabric of Fine Art (Black Dog Publishing, 2008) ISBN

    978-1906155292

    4

    Papanek V Design for the Real World (Thames & Hudson, 1985) ISBN 978-0897331531 4

    Raizman D A History of Modern Design: Graphics and Products Since the Industrial Revolution

    (Laurence King, 2004) ISBN 978-1856693486

    4

    Riemschneider B and

    Grosenick U

    Art at the Turn of the Millennium (Taschen, 2000) ISBN 978-3822868096 4

    Strinati, D An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture (Routledge, 2004) ISBN 978-

    0415235006

    4

    Sturken, M and

    Cartwright L

    Practices of Looking (Oxford University Press, 2009) ISBN 978-0195314403 4

    Taylor L The Study of Dress History (Manchester University Press, 2002) ISBN 978-

    0719040658

    4

    Walker S Sustainable by Design (Earthscan, 2006) ISBN 978-1844073535 4

    Walter S and Hanson

    M

    Motion Blur: Onedotzero (Laurence King, 2006) ISBN 978-1856694650 4

    Weintraub L Making Contemporary Art: How Todays Artists Think and Work (Thames and

    Hudson, 2003) ISBN 978-0500284230

    4

    Wells L Photography: A Critical Introduction (Routledge, 2009) ISBN 978-0415460279 4

    Work to be submitted for assessment

    ESSAY at least 2000 words in length with illustrations

    Your essay should be word-processed; preferably using In Design template for Exhibition Review (Unit 1) or similar on A4 paper

    Each page should be numbered

    Make sure your name appears on each page

    Give the full title/question of your extended essay on page 1

    Leave good margins

    The essay should be 1.5 or double spaced (this allows your tutor to write comments at the relevant point in the essay)

    Use a 12 point font size a basic sans serif font (eg. Arial) is recommended

    Make sure you cite all your references using the Harvard referencing system

    Good quality illustrations should be included, these can be interspersed throughout the essay or collected at the end, they should also be referenced i.e. Location of the work, medium, date, materials, size.

    Your essay should be securely bound

  • Oxfordshire School of Creative Arts, Assignment Brief Edexcel BTEC Level 3 Foundation Diploma in Art and Design (QCF)

    Assessment Criteria

    In order to pass this unit, you need to demonstrate that you can meet all the learning outcomes for the unit. The

    assessment criteria for a pass grade (below) describe the level of achievement required to pass this unit.

    To achieve a pass grade you must show that you are able to:

    p1 Explore techniques and processes using appropriate media safely (IE, CT)

    P2 Manipulate media in relation to creative potential (IE, CT, EP)

    P3 Record experimentation and information in an appropriate format (SM)

    P4 Experiment and combine different media (IE, SM, RL)

    P5 Evaluate the effectiveness of different media (EP, TW)

    P6 Reflect on success and failure (RL)

    P7 Identify new or existing possibilities (CT, EP)

    PLTS (Personal Learning and Thinking Skills): This summary references in the brackets the elements of the

    personal, learning and thinking skills applicable in the pass criteria. It identifies opportunities for learners to

    demonstrate effective application of the referenced elements of the skills.

    Key IE independent enquirers

    RL reflective learners SM self-managers

    CT creative thinkers TW team workers EP effective participators