eprints.usq.edu.aueprints.usq.edu.au/30695/2/gunasinghe et al - pdis-10-15... · web...
TRANSCRIPT
Cercosporin from Pseudocercosporella capsellae and its Critical Role in White Leaf
Spot Development
Niroshini Gunasinghe, Ming Pei You, Gregory R. Cawthray, and Martin J. Barbetti, School of Plant
Biology and the UWA Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, 35
Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
Abstract
Gunasinghe, N., You, M. P., Cawthray, G. R. and Barbetti, M. J. 2015. Cercosporin from
Pseudocercosporella capsellae and its critical role in white leaf spot development. Plant Dis. 99:
Pseudocercosporella capsellae, the causative agent of white leaf spot disease in Brassicaceae, can
produce a purple-pink pigment on artificial media resembling, but not previously confirmed, as the toxin
cercosporin. Chemical extraction with ethyl acetate from growing hyphae followed by quantitative [thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)] and qualitative methods
showed an identical absorption spectrum, with similar retardation factor (Rf) values on TLC papers and an
identical peak with the same retention time in HPLC as for a standard for cercosporin. We believe this is
the first report to confirm that the purple-pink pigment produced by P. capsellae is cercosporin. Confocal
microscopy detected green autofluorescence of cercosporin-producing hyphae, confirming the presence of
cercosporin inside hyphae. The highly virulent UWA Wlra-7 isolate of P. capsellae produced the greatest
quantity of cercosporin (10.69 mg g-1). The phytotoxicity and role of cercosporin in disease initiation across
each of three Brassicaceae host species (Brassica juncea, B. napus and Raphanus raphanistrum) was
also studied. Culture filtrates containing cercosporin were phytotoxic to all three host plant species,
producing large, white lesions on highly sensitive B. juncea, only water-soaked areas on least sensitive R.
raphanistrum, and intermediate lesions on B. napus. It is noteworthy that sensitivity to cercosporin of these
three host species was analogous to their susceptibility to the pathogen, viz., B. juncea the most
susceptible, R. raphanistrum the least susceptible and B. napus intermediate. The presence of cercosporin
in the inoculum significantly increased disease severity on the highly cercosporin-sensitive B. juncea. We 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
believe that this is the first study to demonstrate that P. capsellae produces cercosporin in liquid rather than
agar media. Finally, this study highlights an important role of cercosporin as a pathogenicity factor in white
leaf spot disease on Brassicaceae as evidenced by the ability of the cercosporin-rich culture filtrate to
reproduce white leaf spot lesions on host plants and by the enhanced virulence of P. capsellae in the
presence of cercosporin.
Corresponding author: M. J. Barbetti; E-mail: [email protected]
White leaf spot caused by the fungal pathogen, Pseudocercosporella capsellae can result in
considerable yield loss across a wide range of Brassicas (Brun 1991). For example, severe infections from
P. capsellae result in significant damage to oilseed rape (Inman 1992; Penaud 1987; Barbetti, 2000; Petrie
1978), species utilized as forage Brassicas (Ocamb 2014; Marchionatto, 1947) and/ or vegetable Brassicas
(Cerkauskas, 1998; Reyes 1979; Campbell 1978). In Australia, white leaf spot is considered an important
disease across different oilseed Brassicas; has been reported from all oilseed growing areas (Hamblin
2004; Barbetti 2000; Barbetti 1981); and severe losses occur in highly susceptible varieties (up to 30%)
(Barbetti 2000), or when favourable environmental conditions for disease development occur (Hamblin
2004; Henry 2014). P. capsellae belongs to the Family Mycosphaerellaceae that contains the causal
agents of several economically important crop and tree diseases, and this pathogen has a sexual stage
known as Mycosphaerella capsellae
This pathogen is known to produce a purple-pink phytotoxic compound resembling cercosporin (Petrie
and Vanterpool 1978). Cercosporin is a light-activated (Okubo et al. 1975b), nonspecific, universal toxin
(Tamaoki and Nakano 1990) from many species of Cercospora (Assante et al. (1977). It was first isolated
by Kuyama and Tamura (1957) from Cercospora kikuchii causing a purple stain disease of soybean and
subsequently from other Cercospora pathogens (Balis and Payne 1971; Blaney et al. 1988; Fajola 1978;
Guchu and Cole 1994; Mumma et al. 1973; Tessmann et al. 2008; Venkataramani 1967). Many studies
have been undertaken to determine its structure and chemistry (Kuyama 1962; Lousberg et al. 1971;
Nasini et al. 1982), biology (Daub and Ehrenshaft 2000), modes of action (Cavallini et al. 1979; Daub
2
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
1982; Dobrowolski and Foote 1983; Hartman et al. 1988; Leisman and Daub 1992), contribution to
pathogenesis (Daub 1987; Steinkamp et al. 1981; Upchurch et al. 2005; Upchurch et al. 1991), gene
expression (Choquer et al. 2007; Shim and Dunkle 2002), resistant genes (Daub and Ehrenshaft 2000),
regulation of in vitro production (Jenns et al. 1989; You et al. 2008) and resistant mechanisms to the toxin
itself (Daub et al. 1992; Daub et al. 2000).
Cercosporin is a naturally occurring dihydroxy-perylenequinone (C29H26O10) (Kuyama 1962; Lousberg et
al. 1971; Yamazaki and Ogawa 1972) known to cause toxic effects on plants (Balis and Payne 1971;
Fajola 1978) and bacteria (Fajola 1978; Okubo et al. 1975a) Cercospora isolates secrete cercosporin into
host tissues during infection processes (Daub and Ehrenshaft 2000; Fajola 1978; Venkataramani 1967).
While Fajola (1978) extracted cercosporin from diseased lesions across 16 different hosts, P. capsellae
isolates that did not show any indication of producing cercosporin were still pathogenic to Brassicaceae
hosts (Gunasinghe et al. 2016). However, Upchurch et al. (1991) demonstrated that some isolates unable
to produce cercosporin on artificial culture media, could do so in planta. Therefore, it is evident that the
production and/or role of cercosporin in disease development is complex and conclusions cannot be made
based solely on cultural studies (Daub and Ehrenshaft 2000).
The production of a purple–pink pigment by P. capsellae in vitro had been assumed as cercosporin by
Petrie and Vanterpool (1978) and later by others (Eshraghi et al. 2005; Okullo'kwany 1987). While several
other Cercospora spp. are confirmed to produce cercosporin, there is, however, contrasting evidence that
pigments produced by Cercospora spp. are not always cercosporin (Fore et al. 1988). This lack of
information on the chemical nature of the pigment produced by P. capsellae is puzzling, given that relevant
methodologies are available. Hence, we undertook studies to clarify the identity, nature and role of the
purple-pink pigment produced by P. capsellae, first, to chemically identify it, second, to evaluate its
phytotoxicity across three Brassicaceae species (Brassica juncea, B. napus and Raphanus raphanistrum)
and, third, to determine its role in disease initiation.
Materials and Methods
Isolates. Single-spored, pigment-producing isolates of P. capsellae representing four different isolate
groups obtained from white leaf spot lesions in Western Australia were used, viz. UWA Wlra-7; UWA Wlj-3;
3
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
UWA Wln-9 and UWA Wlr-8, (Gunasinghe et al. 2016). UWA Wln-9 was from B. napus at Bindoon North,
UWA Wlra-7 was from R. raphanistrum at West Calingiri; while isolates UWA Wlj-3 and UWA Wlr-8 were
from B. juncea from The University of Western Australia’s Field Research Station at Shenton Park and B.
rapa from Perth, respectively. Following initial isolation, all isolates were lyophilised and stored in ampoules
at room temperature. When experiments were initiated, each isolate was revived by sub-culturing onto
plates of freshly prepared malt extract agar (MEA: malt extract 20.0 g l -1, glucose 20.0 g l-1, agar 15.0 gl-1
and peptone 1.0 g l-1). Working cultures were maintained as MEA slants at 4 °C.
In vitro production of cercosporin. Each isolate was sub-cultured on to freshly prepared sterilised
MEA medium from the cultures maintained at 4°C. After two weeks incubation at 20°C, the mycelial
fragments from growing edges of each culture were aseptically transferred into separate Erlenmeyer Flasks
(250 ml) containing 150 ml of Malt Extract Broth (MEB: malt extract 20.0 gl -1 , glucose 20.0 gl-1 , peptone
1.0 gl-1 in distilled water). Then, cultures were incubated on a rotary platform shaker (Innova™ 2100, New
Brunswick Scientific) maintained at 150 rpm at 22°C under white fluorescence light for up to five weeks
until the colour of the culture turned purple. Morphology of the mycelium was observed by preparing wet
mounts of cultures on glass slides. Mycelium was placed in a drop of distilled water and examined under an
Olympus (BX51) microscope using both UV excitation and brightfield modes. Imagers were captured with
an Olympus DP71 digital photographic system.
Confocal microscopy for hyphae growing on an agar. Agar plugs (four replicates each) of isolate
UWA Wlra-7 were aseptically transferred on to a freshly prepared MEA plates and incubated for three
weeks in an incubator at 20 °C under cool florescence white light. Hyphae producing cercosporin (as
indicated by purple-pink colour of the underside of the colony and the culture border area) were mounted
on a water drop on a glass slide and visualised under a Leica TCS SP2 AOBS Laser Scanning Confocal
Microscope. All fluorescent images were taken using the 488 nm and 561 nm laser lines to detect the auto-
florescence of the hyphae and cercosporin, respectively. The colour of each channel was assigned by the
Leica SP2 software. At each confocal plane, a resolution of 1024 x 1024 pixels and a scanning speed of
400Hz with a 40x objective was utilized. Superimposing the two channels of each confocal plane generated
the images. Stacking these superimposed images generated the final images. Approximately 14 confocal
sections that covered the entire depth of view for hyphae were acquired and fixed maximum projections of
4
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
stacks generated using Leica software. All images were taken using the same settings for laser power, gain
and offset.
Pigment Extraction and cercosporin standard. Isolate UWA Walra-7 was selected for extraction of
pigment as it produced the greatest amount of pigment as indicated by the dark purple colour of the broth
culture. Broth culture with abundant mycelial growth was filtered through double layered ‘cheese cloth’ to
separate the mycelium. Wet mycelium (1 g) was blended with Stick Mixer (HB1913-C) in 20 ml of ethyl
acetate (EtoAc) and the crude extract separated from mycelial debris by decanting into a 50 ml centrifuge
tube. Pigment extract for further analysis was then obtained by centrifuging the crude extract at 2800 rpm
for 30 min in a hanging bucket centrifuge (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5810) and collecting the particle-free clear
supernatant.
Thin layer chromatography (TLC), UV/visible spectrum and high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) analyses. It was hypothesised that the dark purple or purple-pink pigment
produced by P. capsellae isolates on MEB or MEA, respectively, was cercosporin as evidenced by the
respective colours. Hence, initial pigment extract was compared with cercosporin standard (purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) is from a well-known cercosporin producer, Cercospora kikuchii (Mumma et al.
1973) and three different methods were used to confirm the identity of the pigment as cercosporin.
The pigment extract was resolved by TLC using pre-coated plates of aluminium backed, 200 µm thick
silica gel, with indicator F-254 (Silicycle Inc, Canada). A total of 5 µl of pigment extract and standard
cercosporin were spotted on to a TLC plate (5 cm x 9 cm) with 1 cm distance between spots. The first and
second spots were 5 µl of standard cercosporin and pigment extract from the mycelium. The third spot was
spotted as a combination of standard and pigment extract (2.5 µl each) and pure EtoAc as a blank was the
last (fourth) spot. Spots were air dried and ILC plates developed with chloroform/ethanol/water (80:20:2 v/v)
as the developing solvent in a small glass tank lined with chromatography paper equilibrated with the
running solvent. Developed chromatography paper with purple-pink spots was air dried before calculating
retardation factor (Rf) values. All the studies were carried out at room temperature. To confirm findings,
three identical repeat runs were undertaken with the same conditions, but swapping the position of each
spot.
5
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
The UV/visible spectrums for the cercosporin standard and the crude pigment extract, both in EtoAc,
were obtained using a Cary 3 UV visible spectrophotometer (Varian Instruments Group, Palo Alto, CA) with
a wavelengths scan range of 280 to 700 nm. The absorption maxima were read for both using EtoAc as a
blank.
The pigment extract was compared with the cercosporin standard using HPLC to identify the pigment
present in the extract. Analysis of cercosporin was adapted from Milat and Blein (1995) and undertaken
using a Waters (Milford, MA) high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) consisting of 600E pump,
717plus auto-injector, a 470 scanning fluorescence detector and a 996 photodiode array (PDA) detector.
Separation was performed on a Waters Atlantis C18 column (150 mm x 4.6 mm I.D.) with 5 µm particle
size, held at 30 ± 0.5 °C. A gradient mobile phase consisting of eluent A (acetonitrile with 5%, v/v, acetic
acid) and eluent B (Milli-Qwater with 5%, v/v, acetic acid) at a flow rate of 1.5 ml min -1 was used. An initial
linear gradient from 50% to 70% eluent A over the first 8 min was followed by isocratic at 70% eluent A for
1 min before an immediate change to 100% eluent A. The mobile phase of 100% eluent A was maintained
for 6 min, before immediate change back to 50% eluent A for 10 min column re-equilibration. All solvents
were vacuum filtered to 0.22 µm prior to use and were continually degassed with helium sparging. Samples
in the auto-injector were held at 10 ºC.
All data were acquired and processed with Empower® chromatography software (Waters) with
fluorescence detector settings of 500 nm excitation; 623 nm emission and the PDA set to 470 nm for
quantification with a scan range of 205 to 700 nm. Positive identification of cercosporin was accomplished
by comparing standard retention time for fluorescence and PDA peak area ratios of the two detectors as
well as PDA peak spectral analyses, including peak purity, with the samples. Typical injection volume for
EtoAc extracts was 10 µl, but for samples of lower concentrations, the EtoAc extract was dried down under
a stream of nitrogen and then re-dissolved in the initial mobile phase as detailed above. This allowed for
injection volumes up to 100 µl to be used.
Calibration curves for cercosporin were generated from detector peak area vs the mass of standard
cercosporin injected, and a standard analysed every 10 samples to check for any instrument/detector drift.
Finally, the documented reactions of known cercosporin with series of chemicals were compared with dry
6
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
residues of the pigment extract and standard cercosporin. Solubility and colour differences were recorded
in KOH, NaOH, HCl, H2O, H2SO4 and acetone and at high and low pH values.
In vivo production of cercosporin by P. capsellae
This study was undertaken to confirm cercosporin production on the leaf surface during disease
development. Cercosporin was extracted from developing lesions of field-inoculated plants belonging to
two different susceptible host species, B. juncea (Rohin) and B. napus (Tyilogy).
Isolates (UWA Wlra-7, UWA Wlj-3, and UWA Wln-9) were inoculated into 150 ml MEB in 250 ml
Erlenmeyer flasks and incubated as described earlier. After three weeks of incubation, cultures of all three
isolates with abundant mycelial growth were mixed together in equal volumes and blended for 5 min
(Kambrook®, Mega Blender) to obtain a mixture of P. capsellae mycelial fragments at a concentration of 4 x
106 fragments ml-1.
Mycelial inoculum was used to induce disease in field grown plants as P. capsellae doesn’t produce
conidia on a wide variety of commonly used media (Crossan 1954; Miller and McWhorter 1948). Seeds of
highly susceptible genotypes B. juncea Rohini and B. napus Trilogy (Gunasinghe et al. 2013) were sown in
sequential batches of 9 pots each (6 seeds per pot). All pots were maintained in a controlled environment
room (15°C, 12 h photoperiod and a light intensity of 580 µmol photons m -2 s-1) for 15 to 20 days and then
transplanted into an experimental field plot (1 x 0.5 m) at the University of Western Australia, Crawley,
Western Australia. After transferring to the field, all plants were fertilized weekly with Thrive ®. At
approximately four weeks of age, field plants were spray-inoculated with a mixture of mycelial fragments (4
x 106 fragments ml-1) from the three different isolates using a hand held aerosol sprayer. Inoculations were
repeated weekly for a further three weeks. All inoculations were conducted in the late afternoon to
maximise the period of high humidity occurring naturally overnight. When disease symptoms became
apparent, approximately 20 to 25 dpi, leaves with typical white leaf spot symptoms were collected
separately.
Extraction of cercosporin from white leaf spot lesions. Developing lesions were removed by cutting
and separated from the rest of the leaf and freeze-dried (VirTis benchtop 2K, VirTis Co., Gardiner, USA).
Pieces from healthy leaves from both species were also freeze-dried to serve as controls. Two samples
7
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
each of 2 g were taken from each treatment (two species) and controls before grinding separately in 5 ml
EtoAc using a chilled mortar and pestle. The mixtures were then transferred to a 15 ml centrifuge tube and
cercosporin extracted in EtoAc overnight at 10°C. Tubes were then centrifuged at 2800 rpm for 30 min in a
hanging bucket centrifuge (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5810) and supernatant collected. The extract (5 ml) was
evaporated down to 2.5 ml and analysed for cercosporin by HPLC as described previously.
Phytotoxicity and role of cercosporin in different host species. For all inoculation studies, three
isolates, viz. UWA Wln-9, UWA Wlj-3, UWA Wlra-7 were used as either individual inocula or as a mixture of
all three. The combination of isolates, UWA Wln-9 from B. napus, UWA Wlj-3 from B. juncea and UWA
Wlra-7 from R. raphanistrum, was used to avoid any contradictory outcome that may result by using only a
single isolate derived from a specific host. Three host species were used, viz. mustard (B. juncea Rohini
from India), oilseed rape (B. napus Trilogy from Australia) and R. raphanistrum (wild radish, the major
Brassicaceae weed in canola fields in Western Australia), known to have differing susceptibilities to white
leaf spot disease (Gunasinghe et al. 2016). For all inoculation studies, plants were grown in controlled
environment rooms room at 15°C, 12 h photoperiod with a light intensity of 580 µmol photons m -2 s-1 as
used in earlier cotyledon screening tests (Gunasinghe et al. 2013). To avoid possible nutrient competition
that potentially could influence the response to the pathogen (Burdon and Chilvers 1982), plants were
fertilized weekly with the complete nutrient solution Thrive® (Yates, Australia) according to the
manufacturer’s specification.
The phytotoxin effect and role of cercosporin in initial disease development stages on the three different
host species were evaluated by comparing the damage to the host from three separate treatments; viz. as
culture filtrates (i.e., cercosporin only and no pathogen hyphal fragments), hyphae in sterile distilled water
(i.e., live hyphal fragments but no cercosporin from culture growth medium and any cercosporin present
could only be from hyphae), and hyphae in culture growth media (i.e., cercosporin plus hyphal fragments).
A mixture of mycelia from the same three P. capsellae isolates were used. Each isolate was sub-cultured
on to freshly prepared MEA medium. After two weeks incubation at 20°C, mycelial fragments from growing
edges of each culture were aseptically transferred into separate Erlenmeyer flasks (250 ml) containing 150
ml of MEB. Then, cultures were incubated on a rotary platform shaker maintained at 150 rpm at 22°C. After
four weeks, three separate treatment components were separated off, viz. culture filtrate, hyphal fragments
8
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
in sterile distilled water and hyphal fragments in culture medium, from each isolate as follows. Mycelial
fragment inoculum in culture media was obtained by blending a 50 ml aliquot of each culture showing
abundant mycelial growth for 5 min (Stick Mixer, HB1913-C). From the remaining 100 ml, another 50 ml
fraction of each culture was filtered through two layers of ‘cheese cloth’ and the mycelium collected. The
hyphae collected on the’ cheese cloth’ were transferred to a sterile test tube, washed with two series of
sterile distilled water and resuspended in 50 ml of sterile distilled water. Mycelial fragment inoculum in
sterile distilled water (washed hyphae) was obtained by blending the hyphae in sterile distilled water for 5
min (Stick Mixer, HB1913-C). The third 50 ml fraction of each culture was filtered through two layers of
‘cheese cloth’ to collect the mycelium and the filtrate. This 50 ml of filtrate was then refiltered through a
Millipore Millex®-GN 0.2 µm syringe filter to obtain hyphal-free culture filtrate. The concentration of mycelial
fragments for two treatments, viz. hyphal fragments in culture (original hyphae) and hyphal fragments in
sterile distilled water (washed hyphae) were then adjusted to 4 x 10 6 ml-1 using a haemocytometer counting
chamber (SUPERIOR®, Berlin, Germany). The procedure was repeated with each of the three isolates
separately to obtain 9 treatments (three per isolate).
Seven seeds of each test species were sown in 5.5 x 5.5 cm pots and thinned at 10 days after sowing
to three plants per pot. Twelve-day-old cotyledons of each seedling were inoculated by depositing a single
drop (10 µl) of each of the treatments on each cotyledon lobe. Freshly prepared culture medium (MEB) and
sterile distilled water were used as control comparisons. Inoculated plants were covered with clear
polyethylene bags for 48 h to maintain high humidity in order to maximise infection (Brun and Tribodet
1991) and maintained under the same conditions as above for 21 days. Pots were arranged in a
randomized block design with nine replicates. The whole experiment was fully repeated once.
Cotyledon reactions were recorded at two assessment times, 14 and 21 days post-inoculation (dpi), on
a 0 to 9 scale developed by Eshraghi et al. (2007). Mean lesion diameters were computed for each isolate.
These 0-9 disease scores were then converted into a Percent Disease Index (%DI), where:
%DI = [( a x 0) + (b x 1) + (c x 2) + (d x 3) + (e x 4) +……(j x 9)] (Fajola)/ [(a + b + c + d + e + ……j) × 9)]
and where a, b, c, d, e ……j are the number of plants with disease scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, …..9,
respectively. The %DI values obtained for two time points were averaged for each of the treatments
separately in each of the two experiments. Data were analysed separately for each experiment using two-
9
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
way ANOVA with GenStat Release 14.2 (14 th edition, Lawes Agricultural Trust). Significant differences
between species, isolates and treatment interactions were computed using Fisher’s least significant
differences (LSDs).
Extraction and analysis of cercosporin from culture filtrates. Culture filtrates (25 ml) of each of the
three isolates were transferred to separate 50 ml centrifuge tubes. Cercosporin was extracted with 20 ml of
ethyl acetate for 8 h, by initially adding 10 ml for the first 4 h, then an additional 10 ml for an extra 4 h, thus
an 8 h extraction period in total. Tubes were shaken vigorously by hand for a few minutes to mix ethyl
acetate with the filtrate every hour of extraction. Finally, the 20 ml of ethyl acetate extract was removed and
evaporated to dryness overnight in a fume cupboard, then redissolved in 2 ml of ethyl acetate. The
cercosporin in this extract was then analysed by HPLC as described before. The purple colour of the
aqueous filtrate cleared with the ethyl acetate showed this purple colour by the end of the 8 h extraction.
Results
Pigment production. Isolates of P. capsellae grew in the form of ‘globules’ in MEB under continuous
rotating shaking and started to produce toxin metabolites after about three weeks as indicated by the
change in colour of the broth. The pale yellow MEB started to turn dark brown and then dark purple within
five weeks from production of cercosporin. The colour of MEB was indicative to the quantity of the pigment
produced, with colours of media across the four different isolates varying from dark brown (UWA Wln-9) to
dark purple (UWA Wlra-7). Under a light microscope, the morphologies of the mycelia were similar for all
four isolates. Bright red crystals were ubiquitous in the medium and within the mycelium of all isolates. A
variety of different individual crystal forms free-floating in the broth culture were observed (Figure 1 A-F) or
on the hyphal mat (Figure 1G-I), including conglomerates (Figure 1G). With the UV excitation mode,
hyphae of P. capsellae isolate UWA Wlra-7produced a purple-pink pigment while growing on MEA (Figure
2A) and emitted green fluorescence with cercosporin excreted by the fungus appearing as bright red
crystals among hyphae (Figure 2C). In contrast, non-cercosporin producing hyphae of isolate UWA Wln-8
(Figure 2B) did not produce green fluorescence (black background only, Figure 2D), despite hyphae
actually being present when settings of confocal microscope were altered (Figure 2E).
10
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
On extraction into EtoAc, the colourless EtoAc layer turned bright red (provided the concentration was
≥45 µM) or pinkish-red (if the concentration was lower at approximately 16 µM) Small red crystals could be
obtained by evaporating EtoAc.
Identification of cercosporin by TLC, UV/visible spectrum and HPLC. Identification of cercosporin
with TLC was very effective as both the cercosporin standard and the crude pigment extract had the same
Rf values. On TLC plates spotted with pigment extract in EtoAc, standard cercosporin, standard
cercosporin + pigment extract, and pure EtoAc, there were three similar visible spots at the same level but
no visible spot for pure EtoAc (Figure 3). These three visible spots were for standard cercosporin, pigment
extract in EtoAc and standard cercosporin + pigment extract, and Rf values for each visible spots were as
follows: standard cercosporin = 0.853 ± 0.02, pigment extract from the P. capsellae isolate in EtoAc =
0.860 ± 0.01, and the combined (pigment extract in EtoAc : cercosporin standard, 1:1 ) = 0.856 ± 0.03,
respectively. All three values are mean values across three identical repeat runs.
The UV/Vis absorption spectrum of the crude pigment extracts in EtoAc was identical with the spectrum
for the pure cercosporin standard in the same solvent, both producing absorption maxima in the visible
range at 468 nm (Figure 4).
The identity of the compound was further supported by HPLC analysis of crude pigment extracts in
comparison to the pure cercosporin as the pigment extract reproduced an identical peak with the same
retention time as for the pure cercosporin standard as well as a spectral match using the PDA detector; and
with peak area ratios of standard vs sample for the fluorescence and PDA detector at 470 nm (Figure 5 and
Figure 6).
The reactions of dry residues of the pigment extract and the pure cercosporin standard with different
chemicals are listed in Table 1. The chemical behaviour of the pigment extract was highly comparable to
the pure cercosporin standard and confirmed its identity as cercosporin.
Extraction of cercosporin from developing white leaf spot lesions. Cercosporin was detected in
ethyl acetate extracts of disease lesions of both species, B. juncea and B. napus, by HPLC, but not from
control samples (Table 2).
Phytotoxicity and role of cercosporin in disease in three different host species. Results showed
significant differences (P<0.001) in lesion development on cotyledons of the three hosts (Table 3), in
11
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
production of cercosporin across the three isolates and in terms of disease severity levels in different
treatments (Table 3).
The isolate UWA Wlra-7 produced significantly (P<0.001) greater amounts of cercosporin than the other
two isolates, and did so consistently across two experiments. Cercosporin production in the other two
isolates was much less and not consistent (Table 3). Further, the amount of cercosporin produced during a
specific growth period varied depending upon the isolate. A significantly (P < 0.001) greater quantity of
cercosporin was consistently produced by UWA Wlra-7 (105.4, 106.02) (Table 3). Production of
cercosporin became apparent by the colour change of the growth medium. Presence of ample cercosporin
in culture medium changed its colour from pale cream to dark purple. Colouration from the cercosporin was
particularly noticeable in culture filtrate from UWA Wlra-7 that had a particularly high amount of cercosporin
(Figure 7).
Culture filtrates containing cercosporin were toxic to all three host plant species, but with different
degrees of sensitivity (Table 3). Cotyledon lesions were induced by the hyphal-free culture filtrate rich in
cercosporin on B. juncea Rohini (Figure 8A), B. napus Trilogy (Figure 8D) and R. raphanistrum (Figure 5G).
Lesions also developed from washed live hyphae on cotyledons of B. juncea Rohini (Figure 8B), B. napus
Trilogy (Figure 8E) and R. raphanistrum (Figure 8H). Cotyledon lesions were also induced by unwashed
‘original’ hyphae on three host species, viz. B. juncea Rohini (Figure 8C) B. napus Trilogy (Figure 8F) and
on R. raphanistrum (Figure 8I). For highly sensitive B. juncea Rohini, cercosporin induced comparatively
large, white lesions on cotyledons resembling mature lesions developed by the pathogen itself on field
plants (Figure 8A). In contrast, only water-soaked areas were observed on less sensitive cotyledons of R.
raphanistrum (Figure 8G). Cotyledons of all three host species remained completely healthy when
inoculated with either fresh culture filtrate or with distilled water controls. The leaf lesions caused by the
culture filtrate from UWA Wlra-7, an isolate producing abundant cercosporin, were significantly different (P
< 0.001) across the three host species, viz. lesions more conspicuous in B. juncea Rohini as indicated by
higher % mean lesion sizes (25.07, and 20.01), intermediate on B. napus Trilogy (9.21 and 9.62) and least
on R. raphanistrum cotyledons (5.89, and 5.35), across both experiments (Table 3). Culture filtrates from
other two isolates (UWA Wln-9 and UWA Wlj-3) with less cercosporin also demonstrated toxic effects on all
three host species, though any comparative trends between hosts were not as clear as with cercosporin
12
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
rich culture filtrate from UWA Wlra-7. However, on the cotyledons of B. juncea, there was a strong positive
correlation (R2= 0.54, P < 0.001) evident between the concentration of cercosporin with the size of lesion
induced.
Generally P. capsellae was more effective in producing lesions on cotyledons when applied as
unwashed ‘original’ hyphae. Again this difference was obvious in both experiments with the high
cercosporin producing isolate UWA Wlra-7, as %DI in cotyledons in this instance was markedly higher
when inoculated as original hyphae without washing as compared with lesion development in cotyledons
inoculated with washed hyphae. For instance, when treated with original hyphae and washed hyphae of
UWA Wlra-7, B. juncea Rohini showed significantly (P<0.001) greater disease development than when
treated with washed hyphae in experiment 1 (%DI = 30.94, 16.54) and experiment 2 (%DI = 31.1, 14.25),
respectively (Table 3 Figure 8B,C).
All three isolates of P. capsellae were more virulent against B. juncea Rohini, as represented by high
%DI values, compared with the other two host species. Significant (P<0.001) difference was observed in
both experiments with treatment with UWA Wlra-7, which was highly virulent on B. juncea Rohine,
intermediate on R. raphanistrum and least virulent on B. napus Trilogy (Table 3, Figure 8C,F,I).
Discussion
This is the first study to show that the purple–pink pigment produced by P. capsellae is cercosporin,
demonstrated by extracting and characterizing it as follows. First, qualitative chemical tests and quantitative
analysis conducted in comparison to standard cercosporin from Cercospora kikuchii (Callahan, 1999)
confirmed identical results to our study with P. capsellae. Second, the identical nature of the pigment
extract with standard cercosporin was obtained by TLC and absorption spectra in EtoAc; where thin layer
chromatography of both gave similar Rf values and the absorption spectrum of pigment extract was
comparable with the cercosporin standard, with both having peak absorption maxima at 468 nm. While this
value was slightly different to the published value for the peak absorption maxima for cercosporin in EtoAc
at 473 nm (Tessmann et al. 2008), the absorption maxima were identical for both standard cercosporin and
crude pigment extract in our study. In addition, we believe that this is the first study to demonstrate that P.
capsellae produces cercosporin in liquid media. Finally, this study highlights an important role of
13
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
cercosporin as a pathogenicity factor in white leaf spot disease on Brassicaceae as evidenced by the
production of cercosporin in vivo, the ability of cercosporin-rich culture filtrate to reproduce white leaf spot
lesions on host plants and by the enhanced virulence of P. capsellae in the presence of cercosporin.
Production of cercosporin is common among pathogenic fungi belonging to the genus Cercospora. They
are a highly successful and widespread group of pathogens that cause damaging leaf spot and blight
diseases to diverse crop species including corn, sugar beet, rice, banana, coffee, soybean and several
ornamental and vegetable species. The ability to produce cercosporin is believed to be one of the factors
for their successful pathogenesis over different crop species (Daub 2000). Our study reports production of
cercosporin by a species other than Cercospora. However it is not surprising as these two genera are likely
to have close phylogenetic relationships. Both Pseudocercosporella and Cercospora are in the family
Mycosphaerellaceae. A phylogenetic study based on 28S nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (Crous 2013)
demonstrated Pseudocercosporella resides in a large clade along with Phloeospora, Miuraea, Cercospora
and Septoria within the Mycosphaerellaceae suggesting close phylogenetic relationships among these four
genera. Further, recent studies based on multi-gene phylogenetic data have indicated that
Pseudocercosporella is a polyphyletic taxon comprising a genetically heterogeneous assemblage of fungi
(Frank 2010; Crous 2013) with some species residing in the Cercospora clade (Bakhshi 2015).
Cercosporin produced larger lesions on B. juncea and B. napus genotypes and these two species were
more susceptible to P. capsellae than R. raphanistrum (wild radish) in earlier studies (Gunasinghe et al.
2016; Gunasinghe et al. 2013) where only water-soaked areas were more often observed. Lesions
induced on susceptible host species by the phytotoxic culture filtrate containing cercosporin, were white
and indicative of mature white leaf spot lesions on Brassicaceae as caused when the pathogen is present
(Gunasinghe et al. 2014). It was evident that the sensitivity to cercosporin depended on two factors, viz. the
concentration of the toxin and the host species. For example, filtrate with a high content of cercosporin on
comparatively resistant seedlings (R. raphanistrum) or culture filtrate with low content of cercosporin (e.g.,
culture filtrate from UWA Wlj-3) on the highly sensitive and susceptible B. juncea Rohini were only able to
induce water soaked areas on the cotyledon surface. While cercosporin is reported as a universal
phytotoxin, it was evident that sensitivity to this toxin depends on the host susceptibility/resistance (Daub
and Ehrenshaft 2000) and/or the toxin content (Batchvarova et al. 1992). Producing water-soaked areas on
14
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
leaves, even if not reported before for this phytotoxin, is a type of damage known to be induced by
pathogen toxic metabolites (Amusa 2006). However, when applied to leaves, cercosporin causes necrotic
or chlorotic areas that subsequently became grey brown ‘hollows’ on other hosts (Balis and Payne 1971;
Fajola 1978; Guchu and Cole 1994). Similarly, historical studies found that cercosporin sensitivity depends
on host species. For instance, Fajola (1978), showed that the minimum dose of cercosporin from
Cercospora spp. needed to induce symptoms on different host plants varied depending on the different
sensitivity levels of plant hosts to cercosporin. For example, Fajola (1978) found that with cassava
(Manihot esculenta) symptoms were not observed even with the highest treated dose of 100 µg ml -1. In
contrast, while chlorosis developed in castor oil plants (Ricinus communis) with the same dose, only 10 µg
ml-1 of cercosporin was needed to induce visible symptoms in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Batchvarova et
al. (1992) found that resistance to pure cercosporin paralleled the degree of resistance shown by rice
cultivars to Cercospora oryzae and that highly susceptible cultivars displayed particularly high affinity to
damage from cercosporin in susceptible cells. Similarly, there was a positive correlation between
resistance to leaf spot disease and the sensitivity of five different greenhouse grown sugar beet (Beta
vulgaris) cultivars to cercosporin (Balis and Payne 1971). This being so, cercosporin likely offers an
opportunity to provide a rapid indication of the relative resistances/susceptibilities of Brassicaceae
genotypes in the same way at this has already been undertaken with screening of germplasm of cassava
cultivars for resistance to anthracnose using toxic metabolites of Colletotrichum species (Amusa 1998,
2001). Further, application of a screening technique involving cercosporin is not only relevant because pure
cercosporin can reproduce similar lesions stimulated by the pathogen itself on corresponding host species
(Balis and Payne 1971; Fajola 1978; Guchu and Cole 1994; Venkataramani 1967), but cercosporin also
produces similar initial changes at the cellular level (Steinkamp et al. 1981).
One of the few requirements needed to ensure symptoms from application of cercosporin is the light
dependency for cercosporin to be toxic (Upchurch et al. 1991). Cercosporin has long been identified as a
photosensitiser (i.e., molecules that absorb light energy then converted into a long-lived electronically
excited triplet state that produces activated oxygen species) (Daub and Ehrenshaft 2000; Hartman et al.
1988; Leisman and Daub 1992). Hence, light is critical for toxic action, the majority of which is attributed to
production of singlet oxygen (1O2 ) and superoxide (O ꜙ2) (Daub and Ehrenshaft 2000; Hartman et al. 1988).
15
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
Macri and Vianello (1979) demonstrated the light dependency for cercosporin in affecting plant tissues. Cell
membrane damage by lipid peroxidation has been proposed as the mode of action of cercosporin (Cavallini
et al., 1979) and is associated with nutrient leakage and DNA impairment (Daub 1982; Daub and Briggs
1983). For example, ultrastructural studies by Steinkamp et al. (1981) highlighted membrane damage to
sugar beet (B. vulgaris) cells by cercosporin producing Cercospora beticola during the early stages of
disease development. Further, in toxin treated plant tissues, necrosis or chlorosis from Cercospora spp.
occurs across castor oil plant (R. communis), soybean (Glycine max), tobacco (N. tabacum), common bean
(Phaseolus vulgaris) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Fajola 1978), as do necrotic lesions on sugar beet
leaves (Balis and Payne 1971).
The results suggest that cercosporin is a pathogenicity factor during pathogenesis of P. capsellae.
Detection of cercosporin from white leaf spot lesions and the positive correlation between the level of
cercosporin production and the virulence of the isolates strongly support this conclusion. In the current
study, the virulence of the isolates was strongly correlated with the level of cercosporin production. High
virulence of UWA Wlra–7, for example, is likely due to elevated production of cercosporin. A recent study
by Gunasinghe et al. (2016) also highlighted the strong positive correlation between pigment production by
P. capsellae on agar with virulence on Brassicaceae. Further, in the current study, that there is more
severe disease development following inoculation with hyphae grown in culture media as compared with
washed hyphae is indicative of a role of cercosporin in disease initiation and development. This is
particularly so as cercosporin has long been suggested as a pathogenicity factor in other studies across
many Cercospora diseases (Daub 1982; Fajola 1978; Upchurch et al. 1991). To confirm the role of
cercosporin in disease development, Upchurch et al. (1991) demonstrated the lack of pathogenicity in UV-
induced mutants. Cercosporin has been successfully extracted from diseased leaves (Fajola 1978;
Venkataramani 1967), further suggesting it plays an important role in lesion development. Further, when
isolating from white leaf spot lesions on canola in an Australia-wide foliar disease survey in 2015, purple-
pink colouration of water agar was observed directly around plated lesions even before active growth of P.
capsellae was evident (M.J. Barbetti, unpubl.). In the same way as cercosporin could be used to determine
relative host resistances/susceptibilities, relative cercosporin production by P. capsellae isolates could be
utilized to define the relative virulences of such isolates. Host-pathogen interactions involving Cercospora
16
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
zeae-maydis causing grey leaf spot of maize (Shim and Dunkle 2003) and Cercospora kikuchii causing
purple seed stain disease of soybean (Callahan et al. 1999) are in large part determined by the production
of cercosporin. Hence cercosporin could be utilized to determine the virulence of an isolate by relative
production of cercosporin (as a pathogenicity factor) and susceptibility of a host plant by the sensitivity of
the host plant to cercosporin (as a host resistance/susceptibility factor).
The three P. capsellae isolates used in the current study were identified as cercosporin producers on
MEA (Gunasinghe et al. 2016). However, two isolates UWA Wlj-3 and UWA Wln-9 did not produce
detectable levels of cercosporin in one out of two experiments (and only a low level of cercosporin in the
other experiment). It is evident that the quantity of cercosporin produced by different isolates can vary
greatly. This is not surprising as the level of cercosporin produced is known to vary among species (Fajola
1978; Jenns et al. 1989) and across isolates of the same species (Tessmann et al. 2008; Upchurch et al.
1991). Its production is dependent upon several factors, as it is a composite process involving complex
regulatory cascades, where there are numerous environmental and physiological factors that influence
cercosporin production (You et al. 2008). In the current study, hyphae of P. capsellae emitted a green
fluorescence under confocal microscopy with numerous red crystals in the immediate vicinity. Cercosporin
producing hyphae emitting such green fluorescence is a known indication of cercosporin in a chemically
reduced state inside hyphae (Chung et al. 2002; Daub et al. 2005), important as this provides protection of
the Cercospora spp. from their own cercosporin production and toxicity (Daub et al. 2000).
Acknowledgements
The first author is grateful for the financial assistance of an International SIRF Scholarship funded jointly
by the Australian Government and The University of Western Australia. John Murphy at the Centre for
Microscopy and Characterisation, is gratefully acknowledged for excellent assistance with the confocal
microscopy component of this study. We thank the School of Plant Biology, The University of Western
Australia, for funding this work.
Literature Cited
17
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
Amusa, N. 1998. Evaluation of cassava clones for resistance to anthracnose disease using phytotoxic
metabolites of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. manihotis and its correlation with field disease
reactions. Trop. Agric. Res 1:116-120.
Amusa, N. 2001. Screening of cassava and yam cultivars for resistance to anthracnose using toxic
metabolites of Colletotrichum species. Mycopathologia 150:137-142.
Assante, G., Locci, R., Camarda, L., Merlini, L., and Nasini, G. 1977. Screening of the genus Cercospora
for secondary metabolites. Phytochemistry 16:243-247.
Bakhshi, M., Arzanlou, M., Babai-Ahari, A., Groenewald, J.Z., Crous, P., 2015. Is morphology in
Cercospora a reliable reflection of generic affinity? Phytotaxa 213:22-34.
Balis, C., and Payne, M. 1971. Triglycerides and cercosporin from Cercospora beticola: fungal growth and
cercosporin production. Phytopathology 61:1477- 1484.
Barbetti, M.J., Khangura, R., 2000. Fungal diseases of canola in Western Australia. Bull. 4406,
15.
Barbetti, M.J., Sivasithamparam, K., 1981. Pseudocercosporella capsellae and Myrothecium
verrucaria on rapeseed in Western Australia. Australas. Plant. Pathol. 10:43-44.
Batchvarova, R., Reddy, V., and Bennett, J. 1992. Cellular resistance in rice to cercosporin, a toxin of
Cercospora. Phytopathology 82:642-646.
Blaney, C., Van Dyke, C., and Grand, L. 1988. Cercospora caricis from Cyperus esculentus (yellow
nutsedge): morphology and cercosporin production. Mycologia:418-421.
Brun, H., and Tribodet, M. 1991. A method for estimate the level of resistance in oilseed rape to
Pseudocercosporella capsellae. Bulletin OILB SROP 14:64-66.
Burdon, J. J., and Chilvers, G. A. 1982. Host density as a factor in plant disease ecology. Annu. Rev.
Phytopathol. 20:143-166.
Campbell, R., Greathead, A.S., 1978. Pseudocercosporella white spot of crucifers in California.
Plant Dis. Rep. 62:1066-1068.
18
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
Callahan, T., Rose, M., Meade, M., Ehrenshaft, M., and Upchurch, R. 1999. CFP, the putative cercosporin
transporter of Cercospora kikuchii, is required for wild type cercosporin production, resistance, and
virulence on soybean. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 12:901-910.
Cavallini, L., Bindoli, A., Macri, F., and Vianello, A. 1979. Lipid peroxidation induced by cercosporin as a
possible determinant of its toxicity. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 28:139-146.
Cerkauskas, R.F., Stobbs, L.W., Lowery, D.T., Van Driel, L., Liu, W., VanSchagen, J., 1998.
Diseases, pests, and abiotic problems associated with oriental cruciferous vegetables in
southern Ontario in 1993-1994. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 20:87-94.
Choquer, M., Lee, M. H., Bau, H. J., and Chung, K. R. 2007. Deletion of a MFS transporter-like gene in
Cercospora nicotianae reduces cercosporin toxin accumulation and fungal virulence. FEBS Lett.
581:489-494.
Chung, K., Ehrenshaft, M., and Daub, M. 2002. Functional expression and cellular localization of
cercosporin-resistance proteins fused with the GFP in Cercospora nicotianae. Curr. Genet. 41:159-
167.
Crossan, D. F. 1954. Cercosporella leafspot of crucifers. North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station
Technical Bulletin 109:23.
Crous, P., Braun, U., Hunter, G.C., Wingfield, M., Verkley, G., Shin, H.-D., Nakashima, C.,
Groenewald, J., 2013. Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocercospora. Studies in mycology
75:37-114.
Daub, M., Herrero, S., and Chung, K.-R. 2005. Photoactivated perylenequinone toxins in fungal
pathogenesis of plants. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 252:197-206.
Daub, M., Leisman, G., Clark, R., and Bowden, E. 1992. Reductive detoxification as a mechanism of fungal
resistance to singlet oxygen-generating photosensitizers. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 89:9588-9592.
Daub, M., Li, M., Bilski, P., and Chignell, C. 2000. Dihydrocercosporin singlet oxygen production and
subcellular localization: a possible defense against cercosporin phototoxicity in Cercospora.
Photochem. Photobiol. 71:135-140.
19
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
Daub, M. E. 1982. Peroxidation of tobacco membrane lipids by the photosensitizing toxin, cercosporin.
Plant Physiol. 69:1361.
Daub, M. E. 1987. The fungal photosensitizer cercosporin and its role in plant disease. Pages 271-280 in:
Light-activated pesticides, J. R. Heitz and K. R. Downum, eds. American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC.
Daub, M. E., and Briggs, S. P. 1983. Changes in tobacco cell membrane composition and structure caused
by cercosporin. Plant Physiol. 71:763-766.
Daub, M. E., and Ehrenshaft, M. 2000. The photoactivated Cercospora toxin cercosporin: contributions to
plant disease and fundamental biology. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 38:461-490.
Deighton, F. C. 1973. Studies on Cercospora and allied genera. Mycological Papers 133:42-46.
Dobrowolski, D. C., and Foote, C. S. 1983. Cercosporin, a singlet oxygen generator. Angewandte Chemie
International Edition in English 22:720-721.
Eshraghi, L., You, M. P., and Barbetti, M. J. 2005. First report of white leaf spot caused by
Pseudocercosporella capsellae on Brassica juncea in Australia. Plant Dis. 89:1131.
Eshraghi, L., Barbetti, M. J., Li, H., Danehloueipour, N., and Sivasithamparam, K. 2007. Resistance in
oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) to a mixture of
Pseudocercosporella capsellae isolates from Western Australia. Field Crops Reserch 101:37-43.
Fajola, A. 1978. Cercosporin, a phytotoxin from Cercospora spp. Physiological Plant Pathology 13:157-
164.
Fore, S., Daub, M., and Beute, M. 1988. Phytotoxic substances produced by some isolates of Cercospora
arachidicola are not cercosporin. Phytopathology 78:1082-1086.
Frank, J., Crous, P., Groenewald, J., Oertel, B., Hyde, K., Phengsintham, P., Schroers, H.-J., 2010.
Microcyclospora and Microcyclosporella: novel genera accommodating epiphytic fungi
causing sooty blotch on apple. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi
24:93-105.
Guchu, H. S., and Cole, D. L. 1994. The toxicity of phytotoxins from Cercospora arachidicola and
cercosporin from Cercospora species to tobacco, Swiss chard and groundnut plants. Mycol. Res.
98:1245-1252.20
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
Gunasinghe, N., You, M., and Barbetti, M. J. 2016. Phenotypic and phylogenetic studies associated with
the crucifer white leaf spot pathogen, Pseudocercosporella capsellae, in Western Australia. Plant
patholgy 65:205-217.
Gunasinghe, N., You, M. P., Banga, S. S., and Barbetti, M. J. 2013. High level resistance to
Pseudocercosporella capsellae offers new opportunities to deploy host resistance to effectively
manage white leaf spot disease across major cruciferous crops. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 138:873-890.
Hamblin, P., Kirkegard, J., Sprague, S., 2004. Blackleg and Sclerotinia management research in
canola, Research Update for Advisers - Northern/Southern Region. The Grains Research
and Development Corporation, Canberra,Australia.
Henry, F.D., Steve, M., 2014. White leaf spot of canola, ExtensionAUS.
http://www.extensionaus.com.au/white-leaf-spot/Marcroft
Hartman, P. E., Dixon, W. J., Dahl, T. A., and Daub, M. E. 1988. Multiple modes of photodynamic action by
cercosporin. Photochem. Photobiol. 47:699-703.
Inman, A.J., 1992. The biology and epidomiology of white leaf spot (Pseudocercosporella
capsellae) on oilseed rape., Department of Plant Pathology. The University of London,
303pp.
Jenns, A. E., Daub, M. E., and Upchurch, R. G. 1989. Regulation of cercosporin accumulation in culture by
medium and temperature manipulation. Phytopathology 79:213.
Kuyama, S. 1962. Cercosporin. A Pigment of Cercosporina Kikuchii Matsumoto et Tomoyasu. III. The
Nature of the Aromatic Ring of Cercosporin. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 27:939-944.
Kuyama, S., and Tamura, T. 1957. Cercosporin. A pigment of Cercosporina kikuchii Matsumoto et
Tomoyasu. I. Cultivation of fungus, isolation and purification of pigment. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
79:5725-5726.
Leisman, G. B., and Daub, M. E. 1992. Singlet oxygen yields, optical properties, and phototoxicity of
reduced derivatives of the photosensitizer cercosporin. Photochem. Photobiol. 55:373-379.
Lousberg, R. C., Weiss, U., Salemink, C., Arnone, A., Merlini, L., and Nasini, G. 1971. The structure of
cercosporin, a naturally occurring quinone. J. Chem. Soc. D:1463-1464.
21
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
Macri, F., and Vianello, A. 1979. Photodynamic activity of cercosporin on plant tissues. Plant, Cell and
Environment 2:267-271.
Marchionatto, J.B., 1947. Parasitic fungi of plants, new or little known in Argentina.
Publicaciones Miscelaneas Ministerio de Agricultura No. 3.
Miller, P. W., and McWhorter, F. P. 1948. A disease of cabbage and other crucifers due to Cercosporella
brassicae. Phytopathology 38:893 - 898.
Mumma, R. O., Lukezic, F. L., and Kelly, M. G. 1973. Cercosporin from Cercospora hayii. Phytochemistry
12:917-922.
Nasini, G., Merlini, L., Andreetti, G. D., Bocelli, G., and Sgarabotto, P. 1982. Stereochemistry of
cercosporin. Tetrahedron 38:2787-2796.
Ocamb, C., 2014. White Leaf Spot and Gray Stem in Crucifer Seed Crops in Western Oregon.
OSU-Corvallis, OSU-Corvallis.
Okubo, A., Yamazaki, S., and Fuwa, K. 1975a. Biosynthesis of cercosporin. Agric. Biol. Chem. 39:1173-
1175.
Okubo, A., Yamazaki, S., Akiyama, Y., and Fuwa, K. 1975b. Cercosporin, a novel photodynamic pigment
isolated from Cercospora kikuchii. Agric. Biol. Chem. 39:287-288.
Okullo'kwany, F. S. 1987. Studies on white leafspot of turnips caused by Cercosporella brassicae (Fautr.
and Roum.), Hoehnel. University of Canterbury.
Penaud, A., 1987. La maladie des taches blanches du colza. Phytoma 95:23 - 26.
Petrie, G. A., and Vanterpool, T. C. 1978. Pseudocercosporella capsellae, the cause of white leaf spot and
grey stem of cruciferae in Western Canada. Can. Plant Dis. Surv. 58:69-72.
Reyes, A., 1979. First occurrence of a severe white leafspot on Chinese mustard in Canada. Can.
Plant Dis. Surv. 59:1-2.
Shim, W., and Dunkle, L. 2003. CZK3, a MAP kinase kinase kinase homolog in Cercospora zeae-maydis,
regulates cercosporin biosynthesis, fungal development, and pathogenesis. Mol. Plant-Microbe
Interact. 16:760-768.
22
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
Shim, W. B., and Dunkle, L. D. 2002. Identification of genes expressed during cercosporin biosynthesis in
Cercospora zeae-maydis. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 61:237-248.
Steinkamp, M. P., Martin, S. S., Hoefert, L. L., and Ruppel, E. G. 1981. Ultrastructure of lesions produced
in leaves oí Beta vulgaris by cercosporin, a toxin from Cercospora beticola. Phytopathology
71:1272-1281.
Tamaoki, T., and Nakano, H. 1990. Potent and specific inhibitors of protein kinase C of microbial origin.
Nat. Biotechnol. 8:732-735.
Tessmann, D., Charudattan, R., and Preston, J. 2008. Variability in aggressiveness, cultural
characteristics, cercosporin production and fatty acid profile of Cercospora piaropi, a biocontrol
agent of water hyacinth. Plant Pathol. 57:957-966.
Upchurch, R., Rose, M., Eweida, M., and Zuo, W. 2005. Expression of the cercosporin transporter, CFP, in
tobacco reduces frog-eye lesion size. Biotechnol. Lett. 27:1543-1550.
Upchurch, R., Walker, D., Rollins, J., Ehrenshaft, M., and Daub, M. 1991. Mutants of Cercospora kikuchii
altered in cercosporin synthesis and pathogenicity. Applied and environmental microbiology
57:2940-2945.
Venkataramani, K. 1967. Isolation of Cercosporin from Cercospora personata. J. Phytopathol. 58:379-382.
Yamazaki, S., and Ogawa, T. 1972. The chemistry and stereochemistry of cercosporin. Agric. Biol. Chem.
36:1707-1718.
You, B., Lee, M., and Chung, K. 2008. Production of cercosporin toxin by the phytopathogenic Cercospora
fungi is affected by diverse environmental signals. Canadian journal of microbiology 54:259-269.
23
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
Table 1. Colour reactions of a pure cercosporin standard and the crude pigment extracted from hyphae of a three-week-old culture of Pseudocercosporella capsellae
in malt extract broth using standard reagents and procedures as used in the studies listed (see references below).
Reagent
Colour of the pigment
extract Colour of the standard cercosporin Reference
1 M KOH Green Green (Balis and Payne 1971; Guchu and Cole 1994; Jenns et al. 1989)
1 M HClRed Red
(Balis and Payne 1971; Fore et al. 1988; Guchu and Cole 1994)
1 M NaOH Green Green (Balis and Payne 1971)
Concentrated H2SO4 Purple Purple
(Balis and Payne 1971; Guchu and Cole 1994; Kuyama and Tamura 1957)
H2OInsoluble Insoluble
(Balis and Payne 1971; Guchu and Cole 1994)
Concentrated H2SO4 + H2OBluish purple precipitate Bluish purple precipitate
(Balis and Payne 1971; Guchu and Cole 1994; Kuyama and Tamura 1957)
Acetone Bright red Bright red (Fajola 1978)
Acidic + neutral conditions (< 7.7 pH) Red Red (Fore et al. 1988)
Basic conditions (>7.7 pH) Green Green (Fore et al. 1988; Kuyama and Tamura 1957)
24
628
629
630
631
Table 2. Cercosporin (mg g-1 of dry weight of diseased tissue) determined by HPLC in ethyl acetate extract
of diseased or healthy (control) tissue samples from Brassica juncea and B. napus spray inoculated with a
Pseudocercosporella capsellae mycelial suspension.
Host Species Sample
Cercosporin content (mg g-1) dry weight of diseased leaf area
B. juncea Disease lesions 1 0.79Disease lesions 2 0.55Control ND
B. napus Disease lesions 1 0.66 Disease lesions 2 0.55 Control ND
25
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
Table 3. Percentage disease index (%DI) and the content of cercosporin (µM) in cell free culture filtrates of three host species (Brassica juncea, B. napus and Raphanus raphanistrum) grown under controlled environment room at 15ºC, 12 h photoperiod and a light intensity of 580 μmol photons m-2 s-1, treated with three treatments: culture filtrate (without live hyphae), washed hyphae (without culture medium) and original hyphae in the culture medium with three isolates of Pseudocercosporella capsellae (UWA Wlra-7,UWA Wlj-3 and UWA Wln-9).
Host Isolate
FiltrateWashed hyphae
Original (unwashed hyphae)
Cercosporin con. µM
Mean % DI Mean % DI Mean % DI
Experiment 1B. juncea WLn-9 ND* 0.87 3.88 5.32B. juncea WLj-3 1 2.85 2.88 5.84B. juncea WLra-7 105.4 25.07 16.54 30.94B. napus WLn-9 ND* 0.67 2.39 4.17B. napus WLj-3 1 0.57 1.57 4.06B. napus WLra-7 105.4 9.21 10.96 12.19R. raphanistrum WLn-9 ND* 0 2.31 1.83R. raphanistrum WLj-3 1 0.28 1.34 2.37R. raphanistrum WLra-7 105.4 5.89 9.49 14.04
Experiment 2B. juncea WLn-9 1.2 3.11 2.11 6.89B. juncea WLj-3 ND* 0.98 4.71 4.18B. juncea WLra-7 106.2 20.01 14.25 31.1B. napus WLn-9 1.2 1.85 2.70 5.50B. napus WLj-3 ND* 0.67 2.67 3.40B. napus WLra-7 106.2 9.62 10.33 16.74R. raphanistrum WLn-9 1.2 1.59 1.57 4.06R. raphanistrum WLj-3 ND* 0.77 1.36 2.01R. raphanistrum WLra-7 106.2 5.35 7.05 12.45
*Not detected (Minimum detection: 0.05 µM)Significance of host (P ≤ 0.001); LSD P ≤ 0.05 = Exp1, 1.689; Exp2, 2.73Significance of isolate (P ≤ 0_001); LSD P ≤ 0.05 = Exp1, 1.689; Exp2, 2.73Significance of treatment (P ≤ 0_001); LSD P ≤ 0_05 = Exp1, 1.689; Exp2, 2.73Significance of host x isolate (P ≤ 0_001); LSD P ≤ 0_05 = Exp1, 2.926; Exp2, 4.73Significance of host x treatment (P ≤ 0_001); LSD P ≤ 0_05 = Exp2, 4.73Significance of isolate x treatment (P ≤ 0_001); LSD P ≤ 0_05 = Exp1, 2.926
26
653654655656657658
659660661662663664665666
667
668
Fig. 1. Cercosporin crystals found in liquid culture of malt extract broth containing Pseudocercosporella
capsellae isolate UWA Wlra-7 grown for four weeks on a rotary platform shaker maintained at 150 rpm at
22°C. (A-F): different individual crystal forms free floating in the broth culture. (G-I): crystals and/or
conglomerates (aggregates of crystals, G) also frequently appeared on the mycelial mat.
Fig. 2. With the UV excitation mode, hyphae of Pseudocercosporella capsellae isolate UWA Wlra-
7produced a purple-red pigment while growing on malt extract agar (A) and emitted green fluorescence
with cercosporin excreted by the fungus appearing as bright red crystals among hyphae (C). In contrast,
non-cercosporin producing hyphae of isolate UWA Wln-8 (B) did not produce green fluorescence (black
27
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
background only, D), despite hyphae actually being present when settings of confocal microscope were
altered (E).
Fig. 3. Crude extract of purple-pink pigment
produced by Pseudocercosporella capsellae (Isolate: UWA Wlra-7) and standard cercosporin as resolved
on thin layer chromatogram. Lanes 1-4: 1, ethyl acetate; 2, standard cercosporin; 3, pigment extract; 4,
28
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705705
706
707
708
709
710
29
711
712
Fig. 4. Absorption spectra of crude extract of purple-pink pigment produced by Pseudocercosporella
capsellae (isolate UWA Wlra-7) (A) compared to the standard cercosporin in ethyl acetate (B).
30
713
714
715
716
717
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
Fig. 5. Chromatograms obtained from HPLC analysis for standard cercosporin and pigment extract from
Pseudocercosporella capsellae isolate UWA Wlra-7 in ethyl acetate. A: Photodiode array detector output at
470 nm, Ai standard cercosprin and Aii, pigment extract B: Fluorescence detector output, Bi standard
cercosporin and Bii pigment extract.
31
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
270.8
325.5
470.8
564.5
Match #1 Angle 0.421 Cercosporin
270.8 469.6
565.7
Cercosporin
Abs
orba
nce
(AU
)
0.000
0.015
0.030
0.045
0.060
Wavelength (nm)270.00 360.00 450.00 540.00
Fig. 6. Spectral image of sample peak (bottom line) compared to that of standard cercosporin (top line)
obtained from HPLC analysis of pigment extract from Pseudocercosporella capsellae isolate UWA Wlra-7
in ethyl acetate against standard cercosporin.
32
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
Fig. 7. Colour differences of the culture filtrates obtained by three isolates of Pseudocercosporella
capsellae for experiment 1. A: culture filtrate obtained from UWA Wlra-7, with high amount of cercosporin,
B: Culture filtrate obtained from UWA Wlj-3 and C: Culture filtrate obtained from UWA Wln-9as indicated
by its colour and HPLC analysis (Table 3).
33
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
Fig. 8. 20 day-old Brassica seedlings inoculated with culture filtrates or live hyphae of Pseudocercosporella
capsellae (UWA Wlra-7) grown under controlled environment room at 15°C, 12 h photoperiod and a light
intensity of 580 μmol photons m-2 s-1. Cotyledon lesions induced by hyphal-free culture filtrate rich in
cercosporin on (A) Brassica juncea Rohini, (D) B. napus Trilogy and (G) Raphanus raphanistrum. Lesions
developed by washed live hyphae on cotyledons of (B) B. juncea Rohini, (E) B. napus Trilogy and (H) R.
raphanistrum. Cotyledon lesions were also induced by original hyphae on three host species (C) B. juncea
Rohini, (F) B. napus Trilogy and (I) on R. raphanistrum.
34
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770