eu security research related to maritime...
TRANSCRIPT
9 April 2013
EU Security Research related to Maritime Surveillance
DG Enterprise and Industry [email protected]
P. Salieri
Outline of Presentation
EU Security Research in FP7 as related to Maritime Surveillance
Outlook for Security Research in Horizon 2020
EU R&D
Policy objectives:
Contribute to setting up a European Research Area,
Support the implementation of EU policies,
Support the competitiveness of the EU Industry.
PRINCIPLES:
• Collaborative R&D Min 3 entities from 3 countries (EU
and associated)
• Competitive selection of projects based on independent
Peer Review
• Grants (subvention): calls for proposals (shared costs,
IPR to proposers)
4
Security
1.400 M€
4% of FP7 CP
Space
1.400 M€
4% of FP7 CP
Energy
2.350 M€
7% of FP7 CP
Socio-economics
623 M€
2% of FP7 CP
Environment
1.890 M€
6% of FP7 CP
ICT
9.050 M€
28% of FP7 CP
Transport
4.160 M€
13% of FP7 CP
NMT
3.475M€
11% of FP7
CP
Food
1.935 M€
6% of FP7 CP
Health
6.100 M€
19% of FP7 CP
FP7 Cooperation Programme: 32.413 M€
The 10 Themes
MISSION DRIVEN R&D
• Develop technologies and produce knowledge to reduce capabilities gaps
• Overcome fragmentation of markets
• Stimulate collaboration between technology providers and users.
• Challenge has been more to involve the demand side rather than the technology offer (due to legal/administrative problems).
1. Security of citizens
2. Security of infrastructure and utilities
3. Intelligent surveillance and border security
4. Restoring security and safety in case of crisis
Mission Areas (100% civilian)
Research routes in R&D for Maritime (Border) Security
System development and validation
- Combination of capabilities
- Mission specific
SEABILLA (10 M€ EC contr.)
I2C (10 M€ EC contr.)
Systems of systems demonstration
- Combination of IP results
- Multi-mission
-Demonstration Programme
PERSEUS (27 M€ EC contr.)
Capability development
- Technology development (e.g.
detection) -> (WIMAAS, AMASS,
SECTRONIC) -Road mapping:
OPERAMAR
Challenge for R&D in support to policy
Today: in average 5-6
yrs from definition of
R&D topics to project
completion.
Projects to feed results
of R&D to policy setting
Need to minimize this
interval and
synchronize with
interval of policy
making and
implementation
Internal Security Strategy -
implementation
Threat assessment:
MS, EEAS (SitCen),
agencies
Monitoring
and evaluation:
EP, Council, COSI,
COM annual report
Implementation:
MS, COM, agencies
Decision making:
EP and Council
Policy development:
COM with EEAS
Operational planning: COSI,
COM, EEAS (e.g. CSDP missions)
9
10
AMASS
Autonomous maritime surveillance system Topic: 3.3-02 (2007)
• Content: Maritime surveillance system based on network of autonomous, unmanned surveillance buoys to fight illegal immigration and trafficking
• Funding: 3,580,550.00 Euros
• Consortium: CARL ZEISS OPTRONICS GMBH (DE), Crabbe Consulting Ltd, (UK), Armed forces Malta (MT), Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas (ES), Fugor Oceanor As (NO) Osrodek Badawczo-Rozwojowy Centrum Techniki Morskiej (PL), FhG ITTB (DE), IQ wireless GmbH (DE), HSF spol. s.r.o. Sokolov (CZ), Univ. de las Palmas (ES)
Objectives:
• System of blue border surveillance containing unmanned surveillance buoys with active/passive sensors, hydrophone arrays, data fusion, live streaming and geo-localisation capabilities (including detection of small targets)
Achievements :
• Development of a buoy comprising with all sub-systems and deployment and testing under real conditions in the Melanara Bay off the coast of Gran Canaria
WIMAAS
Wide maritime area airborne surveillance Topic: 3.3-02 (2007)
Content: assess the potential cost reduction, efficiency and enhanced border control benefits for European maritime domain surveillance to be gained via a large-scale integration of unmanned or otherwise remotely piloted airborne vehicles.
• Funding: 2,737,169.00 Euros
• Consortium: Thales S.A. (FR), SELEX GALILEO (IT), Dassault Aviation (FR), SENER(ES),
FOI (SE), Fraunhofer Gesellschaft (DE), EC – DGJRC, Air Force Institute of Technology (PL), EUROSENSE (BE), SATCOM1 Aps (DK), SETCCE (SI), Aerovisión (ES), Thales Communications (FR), Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies (MT)
Objectives: develop simulation models based on operational scenarios, innovative
concepts, perform in-flight experiments, and provide a roadmap for the wider use of unmanned aerial vehicles, also setting priorities for future R&T .
Achievements: no single multipurpose UAV platform capable of covering every altitude
and maritime environment. A multi-platform category system-of-systems would be required. WIMAAS provided a cost estimate based on varying degrees of mission intensity and on the use of multiple (up to 10) types of UAV platforms. These estimates now form the basis of a policy assessment for implementing a wide maritime area surveillance network based on UAVs.
OPERAMAR
An InteroOPERAble Approach to the European Union MARitime Security Management Topic: 7.0-02 (2007)
• Content: Pan-European Maritime Security Awareness towards enhanced Data Exchange and Collaboration between Member States
• Funding: 669,132.00 Euros
• Consortium: THALES UNDERWATER SYSTEMS SAS (FR), SELEX SISTEMI INTEGRATI SPA (IT), INDRA SISTEMAS (IT), Quintec Associates Ltd (UK), AMRIE (BE), JRC (BE), ISTITUTO AFFARI INTERNAZIONALI (IT), Edisoft (PT), STM Savunma Teknolojileri Muhendislik ve Ticaret A.S. (TR), THALES SYSTEMES AEROPORTES SA (FR)
Objectives:
• Mapping the gap between state of the art European needs and requirements
• Define technical requirements for enhanced interoperability
• Create strategic research roadmap
Achievements :
• More than 40 visit reports across Europe to capture current approaches in information gathering with emphasis on Maritime surveillance, analysing in depth Situational awareness and security layer aspects
SECTRONIC
Security System for Maritime Infrastructures, Ports and Coastal zones Topic: 2.3-04 (2007)
• Content: Surveillance and protection of critical maritime infrastructures comprising passenger and goods transport, energy supply and port infrastructures
Funding: 4,496,106.41 Euros
• Consortium: Marine & Remote Sensing Solutions Ltd (UK), UNIRESEARCH BV
(NL), DET NORSKE VERITAS AS (NO), FFI (NO), CHALMERS TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLA AB (SE), ADVANCED COMPUTER SYSTEMS ASC S.P.A. (IT), NATO CENTER for MARITIME RESEARCH and EPERIMENTATION, CARNIVAL PLC (UK), Havenbedrijf Rotterdam N.V. (NL), BW Offshore AS (NO), Autorità Portuale della Spezia (IT), BW Gas ASA (NO)
Objectives:
• Development of 24h small area surveillance system deployable on any kind of ships, platforms, container / oil / gas terminal or harbour
Achievements :
• Cost effective security system enabling surface and sub-surface surveillance and protection
• Fully automatic, requiring little action from operators
• Full remote access and control capability
• User friendly, intuitive, little training required
Sectronic™ Port Installations Example
Image courtesy
PoR
Sectronic™ The Command & Control: Typical alarm situation
The system detects an anomaly, raises an alarm and presents the operator with live video and relevant information on threat for rapid decision making
SEABILLA
Sea Border Surveillance Topic: 3.2-02 (2009)
• Content: Development and demonstration of sea border surveillance system including advanced technology solutions
• Funding: 9,841,603.55 Euros
• Consortium: SELEX SISTEMI INTEGRATI SPA (IT), ALENIA AERONAUTICA SPA (IT),
CONSORZIO NAZIONALE INTERUNIVERSITARIO PER LE TELECOMUNICAZIONI (IT), BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd (UK), CORRELATION SYSTEMS LTD (IL), EADS DS (FR), EDISOFT (PT), EUROCOPTER ESPANA SA (ES), FOI (SE), HITT HOLLAND INSTITUTE OF TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGY BV (NL), INDRA ESPACIO SA (ES), INDRA SISTEMAS SA (ES), JRC (BE), MONDECA SA (FR), Sagem DS (FR), SPACE APPLICATIONS SERVICES NV (BE), THALES ALENIA SPACE ITALIA SPA (IT), Thales Defence Deutschland GmbH (DE), TNO (NL), …
Objectives:
• Definition of cost-effective European sea border surveillance systems integrating space, land, sea and air assets
• Integration of advanced technological solutions
• Demonstration of improvements in detection, tracking, identification and automated behaviour of all types of vessels (open water, shores)
Expected Results :
• Feasible, cost-effective solutions for maritime surveillance combining technological advances (e.g. through use of unmanned air systems and passive sensors, innovative sensor networks and data fusion) with legacy systems
I2C
Integrated System for Interoperable sensors & Information sources for Common abnormal vessel behaviour detection & Collaborative identification of threat Topic: 3.2-02 (2009)
• Content: System of maritime surveillance tracking all vessel movements for early identification of threats
• Funding: 9,869,621.55 Euros
• Consortium: DCNS SA (FR), Rockwell Collins (FR), Furuno Oy (FI), SES Astra Techcom SA (LU), Kongsberg Norcontrol IT AS (NO), Kongsberg Spacetec AS (NO), Clearpriority SA (BE) ZLT Gmbh & Co KG (DE), Meteosim SL (ES), Ajeco Oy (FI), Airshipvision International SA (FR), Intuilab (FR), SOFRESUD (FR), ARMINES (FR), Univ. Toulouse III (FR), ONE (FR),…
Objectives:
• Development of shore-based and deployable airborne and vessel-based sensor platforms
• Capacity building of intelligent traffic analysis comprising vessel activity, flag, regulation and sea condition
• Alert capability in case of suspicious behaviour and transfer of data sets
Expected outcome:
• Innovative capacities to collect / pre-process / fuse / exploit collected data on vessel tracking
PERSEUS
Protection of European seas and borders through the intelligent use of surveillance Topic: 3.2-02 (2010) www.perseus-fp7.eu
Content: Design of a system of systems architecture integrating surveillance systems to address complex security missions, focusing on irregular migration and trafficking.
• Funding: 27,847,579 Euros
Consortium:INDRA SISTEMAS (ES), CASSIDIAN (FR), DCNS (FR), ENGINEERING (IT), ISDEFE (ES),
EADS-CASA (ES), DEMOKRITOS” (GR), GUARDIA CIVIL (ES), PRIO (NO), SAAB (SE), SES-ASTRA (LU), AJECO (FI), INTUILAB (FR), METEOSIM (ES), LUXSPACE (LU), SOFRESUD (FR), INOV (PT), SKYTEK (IE), LAUREA (FI), DFRC (CH), BOEING R&T EUROPE (ES), ECORYS (NL) , CORK INST. OF TECHNOLOGY (IE), MOI France (FR), FORÇA AÉREA PORTUGUESA (PT), SATWAYS (GR), MINISTRY OF DEFENCE GREECE (GR), MINISTRY OF CITIZENS PROTECTION (GR), CMRE (NATO)
Expected outcome:
* A system of systems representative of what would be available from 2015;
* A target vision for an integrated European maritime border surveillance system;
* A set of recommendations and best practices to instantiate this target vision in different contexts and to extend it to more countries, testing CONOPS being defined at Frontex, based on the users and providers feedbacks acquired through two real-life exercises operating in the Western and Eastern Mediterranean regions
20
PERSEUS Roadmap – Present Status
Step 0 - Define & Deploy 2011 Design phase to elaborate the PERSEUS target vision.
Step 1 – 2013 Validate Western Campaign Demonstration
Step 2 – 2014 Validate
Eastern Campaign Demonstration
Step 3 – 2014 Contribute
Set-up and propose a European "standard" for Maritime Surveillance Systems for 2015/2020
Today
21
PERSEUS West Campaign
On-going
Exercise 1:
Communication of
Perseus nodes
Exercise 3: Alboran Sea
Exercise 2: Canary Islands
Exercise 4: West
Mediterranean Basin
1st Half 2013
2nd Half 2013
22
West Campaign Systems and Assets- Real exercises
Asset Description
MPA Maritime Surveillance Platform CN 235
CPV Guardia Civil Patrol Boat
TOPV Transoceanic Patrol Vessel
LOPV Light optionally patrolled vehicle
Coastal Station Radar and Infrared Sensors
MSU Mobile Surveillance Unit
PSR Air surveillance radar
Other AIS and Satellite stations, Meteo services
Threat Rubber boats for simulation of Cayucos
National Coordination Center (NCC) Perseus Work Station
Regional Coordination Center (RCC) Perseus Work Station
Local Coordination Center (LCC) Perseus Work Station
23
West Campaign - Real exercises- Example of scenario
Demand Driven R&D: POV Topics
Pre-Operational Validation invites Public Authorities in cooperation to assess in a realistic user-defined operational scenario the performance levels of innovative technological solutions and their fitness for purpose.
As a test bed for future initiatives in Horizon 2020, last two work-programmes included three topics for Pre-Operational Validation (POV)
Call FP7-SEC-2012-1 Indicative budget: M€ 10 Topic SEC-2012.3.1-2
Pre-Operational Validation (POV) at EU level of common application of surveillance tools at sea
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Call FP7-SEC-2013-1 Indicative budget: M€ 18 Topic SEC-2013.3.2-1 Pre-Operational Validation (POV) on Land Borders
Topic SEC-2013.5.3-2 Testing the interoperability of maritime surveillance systems - Pre-Operational Validation (POV)
Solution 1 Guardia Civil (ES)
Guardia Nacional
Republicana (PT)
Marina Militare (IT),
Guardia di Finanza
Associated to ASI (IT) as
3rd party
EU Satellite Center
Public
authorities
100% EU
75 % EU (as a specific case)
Costs to include also “own” resources in
addition to cost of tests procured via call
for tenders
100% EU
Solution 2
Solution X
Vision, Validation Strategy
Document
leading to publication & evaluation
of Call for Tenders
Development Testing
and implementation
ISDEFE (ES) as Common
Validation Entity
Joint Validation
and Conclusions
STEP 1:
Definition Phase
STEP 2:
Execution Phase
STEP 3:
Assessment Phase
CSA CP CSA
POV CLOSEYE (EC Contr. 9.2 M€)
Funding rate
LESSONS being learnt
Security Authorities realise that demand based R&D approach can bring them benefits.
However:
Big effort (both by EC and participants) needed to mobilise demand side constituency. Much more for a POV project than for a collaborative R&D project.
For authorities to be motivated strong (political) support is needed at national level. Encouraging a consortium of Member States to jointly approach the supply side (and take joint liability for R&D investments) requires much more commitment than encouraging "typical" participants in FP7 to file a grant application to recuperate a percentage of costs of R&D
Economic crisis made it more difficult to leverage additional resources
FP7 rules somewhat unfriendly to public authorities.
GEOLAND2 MYOCEAN MACC SAFER GMOSAIC
MYOCEAN II MACCII
BIO_SOS MYWAVE NORS LAMPRE NEREIDIS EURO4M
MS.MONINA OPEC IncREO DOLPHIN MONARCH-A
ISAC OSS2015 SENSUM SIMITYS CARBONES
MyWATER SANGOMA PREFER SAGRES ReCOVER
SIRIUS LOBOS REDDAF
GLOWASIS G-SEXTANT
IMAGINES G-NEXT
LOTUS
GLASS
SenSyF
CRYOLAND FIELD AC PASODOBLE EVOSS
FRESHMON AQUAMAR ENDORSE DORIS
EUFODOS ASIMUT SubCOAST
COBIOS PANGEO
SeaU
SIDARUS Geo-PICTURE
OPERR
ZAPAS MAIRES Pre-Eartquake REDD-FLAME
MOCCCASIN SEMEP REDDINESS
WatPLAN
MALAREO
EAMNet GARNeT-E
HELM E-AIMS ICOS-INWIRE BRIDGES CORE-CLIMAX
IGAS CHARM
G&A
Support
Co
reS
erv
ice E
vo
luti
on
/ R
&D
Do
wn
str
eam
ap
pli
cati
on
s
Int.
Coop.
Land Marine Atmosp
here
Emerge
ncy
Security Climate
change
FP7 GMES projects overview
FP7 GMES Security Projects timeline
http://maritimesurveillance.security-copernicus.eu
GMOSAIC
DOLPHIN
NEREIDS
SIMTISYSCall
2011 BRIDGES
SAGRES
LOBOS
G-NEXT
G-SEXTANT
FP7 GMES SECURITY projects
Call
2010
Call
2012
2014 2015
Call
2007
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2012 2013 2014 20152009 2010 2011
29
Horizon 2020: Three Priorities
1. Excellent Science (27 818 M€) (EC proposal)
2. Industrial leadership (20 280 M€)
3. Societal challenges (35 888 M€)
30
Security Research in Horizon 2020
"Secure Societies – Protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens": a specific challenge in Societal Challenges
• Maintaining mission-oriented approach,
• Improving competitiveness of EU industries to address gaps and prevent threats to security, incl. cyber-threats
• Further enhancing the societal dimension & coordination
• Reinforcing support to EU internal and external security policies, notably the Internal Security Strategy
31
Implementing "Secure Societies"
• Strengthened coordination with relevant EU Agencies (e.g. FRONTEX, EMSA and Europol) to improve the coordination of EU programmes, policies and initiatives in the field of security (both internal and external).
• Actively pursued coordination with activities of EDA, notably through the European Framework cooperation – but civil orientation maintained
• A more strategic approach towards innovation
PCP - Pre-Commercial Procurement
What
• Public sector buys R&D to steer development of solutions to its needs, gather info about pros / cons of alternative solutions.
When
Challenge requires R&D to get new solutions developed. Problem clear, but pros / cons of potential competing solutions not compared / validated yet. No commitment to deploy yet (PPI).
How
Public sector buys R&D from several suppliers (as appropriate to compare alternative approaches), evaluating progress after critical milestones (design, prototyping, test phase), sharing risks & benefits (e.g. IPRs) with suppliers to maximise incentives for commercialisation.
WHY SHOULD EU SUPPORT PCP IN HORIZON 2020?
Balancing current supply-side-only research and innovation (R&I) with public demand driven R&I can increase the impact and effectiveness of EU R&I funding.
Demand driven projects can shorten time to market because R&D is aligned from start with concrete customer needs, and procurers as first customer reference attract investors for suppliers.
Encouraging public procurers across EU to steer in a coordinated way industry development to better fit their needs via jointly agreed procurement specifications is also expected to help to increase the impact/effectiveness of other EC policy actions (especially those that address fragmentation of public demand, cross-border interoperability of solutions, avoiding supplier lock-in).