european capacity building initiativeecbi climate finance 2011 a stocktaking benito müller director...
TRANSCRIPT
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbiClimate Finance 2011
A Stocktaking
Benito MüllerDirector ecbi
eu
ropean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive
initia
tive e
uro
péen
ne d
e re
nfo
rcem
en
t des
cap
acité
s ecbi
for sustained capacity building in support of international climate change negotiations
pour un renforcement durable des capacités en appui aux négociations internationales sur les changements climatiques
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
InternationalSources
IFIs/IGOs/Funds
Country A
Country B
Country CFunded
Activities
Recipient Country D
InternationalSources
InternationalConsolidated Fund
Country A
Country B
Country C
Funded Activities
Recipient Country D
fragmented consolidatedcentralised decentralisedretained devolved
fragmented consolidatedcentralised decentralised
retained devolved
Status Quo G77 and China
InternationalSources
InternationalConsolidated Fund
National Funding Entity
Country A
Country B
Country C Funded Activities
Recipient Country D
fragmented consolidatedcentralised decentralised
retained devolved
RFM
i) fragmented or consolidated, ii) centralized or decentralized, iii) devolved or retained.
The Global Climate Finance Regime - Three Descriptive Dimensions
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
InternationalSources
Green Climate Fund
National Funding Entity
Funded Activities
Recipient Country D
IFIs/IGOs/Funds
Country A
Country B
Country CFunded
Activities
The Global Climate Finance Regime – The Future Architecture
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
International Climate Finance: The Status Quo according to National Communications
• Reported financial contributions made by Annex II Parties to multilateral institutions
• Financial contributions reported by Annex II Parties to the Climate Investment Funds in the period 2005–2010
• Bilateral contributions
Source: UNFCCC Secretariat, Compilation and synthesis of fifth national communications, Addendum: Financial resources, technology transfer, vulnerability, adaptation and other issues relating to the implementation of the Convention by Parties included in Annex I to the Convention, 20 May 2011, FCCC/SBI/2011/INF.1/Add.2.
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
Annual averages, $bn Shares in 1998-2010 total
World Bank; 15028; 34%
UNDP7%
African DB3%Asian DB
2%
Others; 54%
1998-2000 NC3 2001-2004 NC4 2005-2010 NC5 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5.8
4.9
7.3
NATCOM Multilateral Contributions by Annex II Parties
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
LDCF SCCF CIFs GEF Trust Fund
World Bank -
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
LDCF SCCF CIFs -
50
100
150
200
250
300
NATCOM 4 Multilateral Contributions: UNFCCC or not?
NC4 (2005 –10)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
The Balances of non-UNFCCC Multilateral Contributions: The Case of the CIFs
Mexico (OECD)
33%
Turkey (OECD)18%
Egypt15%
Indonesia13%
Thailand7%
South Africa5%
Vietnam3%
Ukraine3%
Philippines2%
Colombia2%
CTF Trustee Commitments
Total funds received:Mitigation : Adaptation = 88 :12
CTF funds committed:Developed : Developing = 50:50
Source: CIF Disbursement Reports (31/12/2010)
PPCR CTF0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
307
1,427
11
902
0.4
71
Funds dispersed
Funds held (commited)
Funds held (uncommited)
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
PPCR AF0
100
200
300
400
500
600
329373
251 173
13
9
34
22
54
1.7
12
Funds dispersed (to projects)
Funds dispersed (for PGs)
Funds held (commited to projects)
Funds held (commited to PGs)
Operational expenses
Funds held (uncommitted)
Earmarked additional revenue
PPCR AF0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
19%12%
48%
0%
31%
71%
2%
0%
0%
16%
‘PG’ = Preparation Grant
Adaptation Funding: The Pilot Programme for Climate Resilience and Adaptation Fund
Cumulative: Committed or Spent
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
The SPA portfolio comprises 26 GEF projects and programs financed by $48.35 million in SPA funding, $79.28 million in GEF focal area support (for 12 projects), and $649.64 million in other cofinancing support, for a total portfolio value of $777.27 million.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
96%SPA+
TF minus SPA+
The GEF Trust Fund 2005-10
Funds received NC4: $3billionFunds spent on adaptation: $127million
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
1998-2000 NC3 2001-2004 NC4 2005-2010 NC5
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Mitigation Table 8 Adaptation Table 7
1998-2000 NC3 2001-2004 NC4 2005-2010 NC5 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Mitigation Table 8 Adaptation Table 7
NATCOM Bilateral Contributions: Overall Picture
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
1998-2000 NC3 2001-2004 NC4 2005-2010 NC5 -
2
4
6
8
10
12
Bilateral contributions (annual average, $bn)
Multilateral Contributions (Annual averages $bn)
1998-2000 NC3 2001-2004 NC4 2005-2010 NC5 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Bilateral contributions (annual average, $bn)
Multilateral Contributions (Annual averages $bn)
NATCOM Contributions: Overall Picture
eu
rop
ean
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
initia
tive e
cbi
1 2 30
20000
Mitigation Table 8
Mitigation Table 8
NC3 NC4 NC50
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
Mitigation Table 7
Mitigation Table 7
(d) the main challenges when comparing data across Parties relate to the differences in the sectoral categories used by Annex II Parties to aggregate their financial data, and in the reporting periods/years and currency used by Annex II Parties;
(e) the use of different time bases makes any comparison or aggregation of data significantly difficult. Many Annex II Parties provided information on their financial contributions by year, multi-year period or GEF replenishment cycle, or for several years over a period. Reporting periods vary across Annex II Parties. Several Annex II Parties reported for a multi-year period without annual breakdown or provided information on their contributions over a GEF replenishment cycle;
What Figures? The problem with current reporting