european physical society 19 th nuclear physics divisional conference new trends in nuclear physics...
TRANSCRIPT
European Physical Society19th Nuclear Physics Divisional Conference
New Trends in Nuclear Physics Applications and TechnologyPavia (Italy) September 5-9, 2005
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES AND SIMULATIONS OF SPALLATION NEUTRON PRODUCTION ON A THICK LEAD TARGET
Mitja Majerle
NPI CAS
Řež, The Czech Republic
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Introduction
Generally : Experiments with high-energy protons on heavy targets
(~ADS), spallation neutrons, direct beam We measure transmutation possibilities, neutron fields,
we compare data with model simulations
Focus – The PHASOTRON experiment : Protons, neutron field (threshold detectors) Transmutation of Iodine (short-lived isotopes)
... and the simulations What and how we calculate Comparison with the experiment The influence of the setup parts
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
•Neutrons and protons react with detectors: (n,), (n,2n), (n,xn), (n,), (p,n), (p,), ...
•Yields of produced elements are detectable in -detectors
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Proton beam – 660 MeV, 10 min
The integral measured with two foils (Al,Cu) : 1,58·1015, accuracy 6%
Beam displacement (Al, Au, Bi foils): beam was shifted upwards - few mm
Reaction : (p,xn+yp), (p,), ...
Neutron field Al, Au, Bi foils Reactions : (n,xn), (n,), (n,) Spatial and energetic distribution of
spallation neutrons We do not see the whole spectrum !
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Experimental results
27Al(n, )24Na
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance along the target [cm]
B [
g-1
pro
ton
-1]
196Au(n,x)Au
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
1E-04
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance along the target [cm]
B [
g-1
pro
ton
-1]
Au-194
Au-196
Au-198
B=Number of produced nuclei in 1 g of material per one incident proton
207Bi(n,xn)Bi
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
0 10 20 30 40 50
Distance along the target [cm]
B [
g-1
prot
on-1
] Bi-206
Bi-205
Bi-204
Bi-203
Bi-202
Bi-201
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
How do we get the neutron spectrum from that ?• We cannot ! Experimentaly we can get it with other types of detectors.
Calculated neutron spectrum
1E-5
1E-4
1E-3
1E-2
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E-7 1E-5 1E-3 1E-1 1E+1 1E+3
Energy [MeV]
Neu
tron
s pe
r in
cide
nt p
roto
n
Spectrum information only for regions
197Au(n,)198Au
197Au(n,2n)196Au
27Al(n,)24Na
• Our results are however important...
... for simulations.
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Iodine samples 4 samples: 2×127I, 2×129I 129I - 90% of 129I, 10% of 127I During the experiment
~1/1011 part of the iodine nuclei transmuted
Chart explanation : 130I produced only in 129I Ratios of produced
elements are higher in 127I samples (on graphblue)
120I lower than expected – two isomers produced with almost the same lines, and only one is detected
Stable
=hours,days
=years
=minutes
(n,xn)+
127I and 129I samples at 9th cm
1E+06
1E+07
1E+08
1E+09
1E+10
I-130 I-128 I-126 I-124 I-123 I-121 I-120 I-119 I-118
Isotope
Nu
mb
er o
f p
rod
uce
d n
ucl
ei
i7n3i9n2
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Simulations, how/what we calculate
MCNPX code v. 2.4.0 (on Linux, parallel computing)
Input : setup geometry starting conditions
Output 1: neutron distribution
Cross-section libraries (Au, Al - ENDF; Bi - experimental; Iodine - ?)
Output 2: masses of produced
elements or B-values
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
How do we get the neutron spectrum from that ?• We can convolute the calculated neutron spectrum with the cross-section for a given reaction (SSW+HTAPE3X+convolution).
Calculated neutron spectrum
1E-5
1E-4
1E-3
1E-2
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E-7 1E-5 1E-3 1E-1 1E+1 1E+3
Energy [MeV]
Neu
tron
s pe
r in
cide
nt p
roto
n
Spectrum information only for regions
197Au(n,)198Au
197Au(n,2n)196Au
27Al(n,)24Na
• Computer can convolute the spectrum with cross-sections and outputs B (F4+FM tally).
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Calculations vs. experiment
B-values for Bi and I were not yet calculated (problem: cross-section libs)
27Al(n, )24Na
1E-8
1E-7
1E-6
1E-5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance along the target [cm]
B [
g-1 p
roto
n-1]
experimental
simulation
27Al(n, )24Na
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
1,1
1,2
1,3
1,4
1,5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance along the target [cm]
Ratio
197Au(n,2n)196Au
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance along the target [cm]
Ra
tio
197Au(n,4n)194Au
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
1,1
1,2
1,3
1,4
1,5
1,6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance along the target [cm]
Ra
tio
Calculated values in comparison with the experiment for 27Al(n,)24Na
Ratios between calculated and
experimental values for 24Na, 196Au, 194Au
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Influence of the setup parts
Concrete walls : Neutrons are
moderated and reflected back
197Au(n,)198Au
1E-8
1E-7
1E-6
1E-5
1E-4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance along the target [cm]
B [g
-1 p
roto
n-1
]
experimentalno wallsHTAPE3XFM
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Influence of other simplifications Extensive calculation tests on PHASOTRON and EPT setup
revealed that : HTAPE3X and F4 methods results do not always agree. Beam profile and displacement influence the neutron field (3 mm ~
5%). Detectors minimally influence the neutron field. Metal holders, tables, ... have minimal influence. ... and more.
The use of parallel processing (PVM) speeds up our calculations significantly.
2000
4000
6000
8000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Accumulated processor power [MHz]
His
tori
es s
imu
late
d in
1 s
nps=2000k
nps=50k
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Conclusion We try to imitate an ADS systems with the setup Experimentally : we get new data about transmutation rates (I,
(n,xn) reactions, others...) – precious in ADS design Calculations : it seems that we measure right things to test the
codes We can describe new, similar systems with the computer with the
accuracy (50%) Plans :
to finish analyzing the experimental data, to improve the accuracy of the calculations, try to recalculate all this with DCM (Dubna Cascade Model) code, probably another experiment on Phasotron, different setups...
Thank you.
19th NPDC, Pavia (Italy), September 5-9, 2005
Experiment data
Intensive beam (2,6·1013 protons/s) of protons with energy 660 MeV from Phasotron (http://phasotron.jinr.ru)
Date and time: 14th of December 2003 at 16:33 Pb target, without box to moderate fast neutrons The irradiation time : 10 minutes After another 10 minutes start of measurements
of I samples and foils on detectors ORTEC and CANBERRA