Evaluating an e-portfolio

Barbara Plimsaul

Employer Engagement Manager

Introduction – why e-portfolio?

College purchased Blackboard several years ago – WBL use it for delivering some learning + as a resource library but limited

Awarding Bodies encouraging centres to offer e-portfolio route

College developed a strategic ICT plan Reviewed WBL + produced plan

E-portfolio selection process

Needed to : identify key people who we needed

‘buy-in’ from agree criteria for selection look at benefits of the programme to

justify expenditure & need arrange demonstrations compare and select

Identify key people who we needed ‘buy-in’ from

It is essential to have the key people on board to support the introduction of any change & help with implementation:Assessors & IVIT departmentCourse co-ordinatorsKey managers

Agree criteria for selection

Awarding bodies recognised the e-portfolio Cost – initial outlay and subsequent cost Savings – benefits of e-portfolio Presentation – what the portfolio looked like

and how easy was it to use Flexibility in the programme – be able to

adapt or add to

Benefits of the e-portfolio

A report had to be produced to justify the expenditure & key benefits:Learner achievement & retention rates Savings against traditional methodsFlexibility Quality Ease of use Cost of set up and running

Demonstrations

We selected 3 packages to review – this was through being suggested them, seeing them at events & research:

Forward plus - http://www.forwardplus.net/public/displaycontent.aspx

eNVQ - https://secure9.envq.co.uk/cgi-bin/envq

Learning Assistant - http://www.learningassistant.com/

Compare and select

All were very similar in what they could offer but there were differences that we had to weigh up in how important they were to us:

How many of the awarding bodies recognised/endorsed it

At what stage of development was the system

What the e-portfolio looked like What the company would offer cost/support

Our choice – Learning Assistant

Satisfies the 3 main awarding bodies requirements Cost much the same in set up, but licences cheaper

and also had a different price for short courses A1/V1 Graphics good, so were Forward Plus but package not

as advanced Most similar to paper-based portfolio – candidate led.

For us eNVQ got you grading a piece of evidence out of 9 (not NVQ philosophy for us)

Flexibility in being able to change things and be part of the development

Uploaded a number of standards as a package - Good support service – personal touch

Benefits of e-portfolio

Learners complete 30-60% faster (still early days)

Savings – cost of assessor & IV travel time, paperwork, reprographics

Flexibility of when to work on the portfolio – IV can look at it & not hold up candidates progress or be under pressure

No more bulky folders or lost evidenceIncreased motivation and quicker completion,

reduce drop out rates (still early days)Transparency at all stages

Challenges

As always it is never plan sailing, there will always be challenges:

Speed of opening the evidence, especially photos Change way of working – positive & negative (if

system slow) Find out system cannot always do exactly what you

can with paper e.g IV Need to up grade our digital recorders Audit – laptops being able to have wireless access!BUT would not go back!!!!..... Certain departments in the

college now want to come on board from having delivered a training/ introduction to this (once again WBL forging the way)

Demonstration of Learning Assistant

https://system.learningassistant.com/RUTC/

http://showcase.learningassistant.com

QUESTIONS?

Over to you, but I might not be able to answer it if it is too technical!!!!!!

Contact details – bplimsaul@rutc.ac.uk