evaluating brand extension - coca cola_srikant rajan_ifmr
TRANSCRIPT
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 1/15
Objective of the Project Work
This project begins with an evaluation of the failure of the brand extension of Coca-ColaCompany in case of the product Vanilla Coke (VC)
Certain causes are identified and after analysis it is deduced that the extension
opportunity exists wrt to the product vanilla coke
!lternative extension opportunities are then evaluated and a relaunch strategy is
suggested
"
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 2/15
Table of Contents
# $easons for %ailure
## &valuating the extension 'pportunity
! !ctual and esired consumer knowledge about the brand
#dentification of &xtension Candidates
C &valuation of &xtension Candidates
### $elaunch *trategy + *T, !nalysis
! ,roduct
*egmentation
C Target
,romotion
& *uggested ,romotional ethods
#V %inancials
! *ales %orecast
&xpense udget
V $eferences
.
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 3/15
I. Reasons for Failure/
The brand extension here is evaluated on its
•!bility to create salience
• #ts uni0ueness and favorability
• The promotion model employed for communicating the extension
The #ndian soft drink industry particularly in the C* segment is a duopoly with ,epsi and
Coke leading the roost &ach has having specific brand loyal
Thus the twin use of the names Vanilla and Coke in the new product description would have
demonstrated the categor membershi! and created salience.
*trong brand loyalty would have prompted buying 1sampling initially by the coke loyal
2owever3 the nomenclature of 4Vanilla Coke 4may have resulted in the product not have
being perceived as a new product #t would have thus immediately pitted against the classic
Coke %or the Coke loyal3 VC had the promise of a Coke product3 but not the taste of coke
which may have lead to its immediate rejection
"dditionall the high salience creation ma have also contributed to the inabilit of VC
to create a uni#ue association The name Vanilla used along with coke may have created a
different perception #ts clarity as to whether the new drink was a cola or a non cola drink
was not visible *ince Vanilla is associated with ice cream3 it is likely that3 the product was
perceived as an ice$cream % soda and not as a soft drink.
From the favorabilit !ers!ective there are t&o factors o!erating &xternally3 this time
period was that of declining sales of carbonated drinks 'ne of the major reasons was
pesticide and groundwater controversies #n addition3 the health drink and the bottled water
segment were also growing in large numbers 2owever3 blind tests revealed consumer
acce!tance of the ne& taste so it is hard to conclude that the demand for the product would
be low
5
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 4/15
The model ado!ted for communication &as the use of a retro theme. #n terms of reach
the promotion methods had a huge impact with an excess of 4 lakhs smses in just an
estimated 4 weeks. 2owever the sustainabilit of the reach' measured in terms of
favorabilit of the launch theme could not be built by activities such as launch of remix
songs 'ne reason for this could be the choice of a celebrity Vivek 'berai for promotion 2e
conformed to the tagline and lent credence to the launch of a new product as he was also a
newcomer in the film industry winning acclaim. (o&ever' he &as a!!reciated for
unconventional roles and did not fit into the theme of retro. )*ismatch bet&een
!roduct s!ecification )ne& drink+ and !romotion )retro++
The new drink was targeted at the youth in the age group of ". to .62owever its positioning
vis-7-vis other products in the soft drinks market was not clearly defined %ollowing
positioning might have been intended/
• Target group laggard ; the group of consumers highly resistant to change and are
characterized by their conformance to traditional products. The retro feel was aimed
at creating an impulsive behavior by appealing to traditional values.
• In addition !oke also ambitiously banked on high sales to the adventurous by
riding on the "#$ of novelty.
• %ith the & broad segments in hand it was also logically assumed that the third group
of followers would also pitch in.
(o&ever this !rocess did not do &ell for VC' because it conflicted &ith its image of
something ne&. )*ismatch bet&een !roduct s!ecification and !romotion+
8
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 5/15
II. ,valuating the e-tension o!!ortunit
". "ctual and esired consumer kno&ledge about the brand
To identify sources of e0uity a mental map is constructed The steps in construction of the
mental map are as flows3
! face to face interview was conducted with 9 respondents3 (8 male : 8 female) in the age
groups of .;-.<3 all were asked the following
• Top of mind recall3 words association that came with the coca cola company1coke
• Colors they would never associate with Coke
• The associations al&as !referred for the /0o color1 association &ith coke(This
is an adaptation if =altman etaphor &licitation Techni0ue(=&T))
Inferences
• Thus the colors red1black is the most favorable associations
To! of *ind "ssociations
0o
Color
"l&as associations &ith the 0o color
association
Tradition3 chilled3 >thanda>3 !mir khan3 friends3
party3 relaxation1recreation3 black3 red3 !iswarya$ai3
?reen
&nvironment3 forests3 nature3 freshness3
mountain dew3 #ndian flag
lue
dynamic3 power3 sky3 ,epsi3 ocean3 music
band(one @ove)3
,ink 4?irlyA3 arbie3 soft toys3 costumes3 smallkids
Bellow flower3 footie3 mango3 jelly3 candy
hite
church3 milky bar3 hospitals walls3 Venice3
Christmas3 pure
<
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 6/15
• The e0uity of cokes is highly dependent on brand ambassador3 !mir Dhan shows a
strong and uniform association with Coke
• Eniform disconnect of Cokes with nature3 freshness3 power3 dynamism3 purity
2. Identification of !ossible e-tension candidates on basis of overall brand
associations
!s seen above white is a strong 4no colorA association for Coke The same respondents
however
• id not pick up vanilla as the most favorable association with the color white
• 2owever when given the option or told about vanilla the immediate association
was with the color white
• Vanilla showed a uniform association with ice cream and age old tradition
2ence
• Coke cannot introduce a product that has any source of association with the color
white
•
Cannot introduce a product using 4CokeA in the product name3
• rinks with any departure from existing color of black3 from the stable of Coke
are suspect of success
• !n association with the color red is acceptable
Thus !ossible e-tension candidates are !roducts that have a traditional a!!eal'
usage among grou!s' on occasions of celebration' recreation or rela-ation and are
consumed cold3chilled The product here is
• ! flavored drink
• lack in color 3 consumed cold
• 2as an association with vanilla3 which in turn has a traditional usage in cold form
F
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 7/15
Thus the alternative !roduct characteristics are ),-tension candidates+' Classic
*i-' Classic Tinge' Coke *i-' Cold $dose' /Thanda1 *i-3Tinge.
C. ,valuation of e-tension candidates
2asis of
,valuation Coke *i- Classic mi-
Thanda
*i-3Tinge Cold ose Classic Tinge
*alienceVer high3 immediate association
with parent Coke rand@ow
(igh as
Thandaword is
usedalmost
interchangeably with
Coke
@ow
(igh as Thanda
word is usedalmost
interchangeablywith Coke
Eni0ueness1
%avorability
@ow as a new association is not
built
! new
association
is built butnot
leveraging
on old
positiveassociation
Ver high
as it
leveragesan existing
favorable
association
to create anew
Go new
association
@ow - ! new
association is built but not
leveraging on
old positive
association
Compelling @ow edium edium @ow edium
The basis of evaluation are defined as
• 4alience the extent to which the extension is able to derive strong category
association
•
5ni#ueness the ability to leverage and existing positive association to build on anew association that shows high match to the product characteristics
• Com!elling the logic of extension evidence
H
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 8/15
The relevance of the extension measure the logic of the new product wrt to the
parent brand 2ere it is high across all alternatives as Coke is launching this
!roduct b leveraging its e-isting !resence in the soft drink segment.
Thus on the basis of the above evaluation the most likel e-tension candidate is Thanda
*i-3Tinge. (o&ever the &ord tinge has a touch of nostalgia )tradition+ hence can create
connect &ith traditional values as com!ared to mi-.
III. Relaunch 4trateg 6 4TP "nalsis
The relaunch strategy has been proposed taking into consideration only the #ndian arket
". Product
• The product to be offered is not vanilla coke but a new drink which is Thanda
Tinge (TT)
• The product is not a cola3 lime or an orange flavored drink but a completely new
drink in a new category of Mixes
• This !roduct s!ecification also gives the freedom of designing future variants
similar to TT sa for instance vanilla orange. "dditionall such a !roduct
s!ecification has clearl defined POP4 and PO4
o POP4 )Points of Parit+/ Carbonated soft drink
o PO4 )Points of ifferentiation+/ ! new variety (ix) of carbonated
soft drink clearly differentiable from cola3 lemon and orange variants
2. 4egmenting
The carbonated soft drink market can be broadly segmented into the following/
" Cola . @emon 5 'range
9
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 9/15
The segments are derived assuming the basis of the buying of carbonated soft drink is
solely determined by user preferences with a low degree of dependence on factors such
as/
• ?eographic/ ,arameters such as *tates3 $egion and Geighborhoods
• emographic/ ,arameters such as ?ender3 'ccupation3 and $eligion
%or the $elaunch a similar type of segmentation3 is proposed 2owever3 it is planned to
create a new segment (ixes) which is combination of certain fractions of existing 5
segments 2ence it is planned to have an undifferentiated marketing of the product by
temporarily discarding the prevalent segmentation criteria but targeting the entire market
as a whole
C. Target/ ithin the broadly defined three segments above the buyers can also be
grouped according to their buying preferences into laggards' ambitious and
6
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 10/15
follo&ers The laggards of each group are the loyalists of a particular brand and flavor
That is in the broadly defined carbonated market the cola buyers would include some set
of people who would always buy a cola (laggards)3 ambitious(those who buy cola but are
always willing to experiment ) and finally the followers who always follow others
The target audience for the TT would be the ambitious of each segment population in the
short run Then the promotion campaign would leverage on the increased sales on
account of use by ambitious to promote the use of TT among laggards The advantage of
this &ould be lo&er cannibali7ation of sales of other !roducts. That is to sa that
since the !lan is to target e-isting users in the 8 segments the decrease in sales of a
!articular !roduct in each segment &ould be com!arativel lo& as com!ared to the
!revious dro! in sales of classic coke)during launch of VC+.
. Promotion/
#t is planned to promote the use of TT as a drink for an occasion 9everage on the
traditional use of vanilla as an essence to !romote drinking of TT. The use of vanilla
as an essence is !revalent in ice creams and intuitivel the vanilla ice cream buers
&ould com!rise of laggards and ambitious &ith a major !ortion being laggards.
Phase :; Target ambitious group of buyers in each segment 4tress on novelt factor
and !romote TT as a drink for a dail occasion. TT would initially be available in
small bottles to aid impulsive buying by the consumer who would wish to try the new
product The advantage would be an increase in sale of number of units but margins
would suffer on account of increasing packaging expense
Phase <; The test period is anticipated to be F months as was in the earlier case The
second phase of promotion would leverage on/
• The sales for the past F months (so man !eo!le have e-!erienced the jo of
TT kind=.+
• !nd stress on the traditional use of vanilla( building a new association)
";
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 11/15
The target is laggards soI greater emphasis would be on the second factor The sales are
expected to be constant if not increasing 2ere it is assumed that the ambitious group
would have either stopped the use of Tinge or have considered it as another drink to be
had regularly #n the worst case scenario of first case3 the conversion of even a small J of
laggard group can lead to sustainable sales.
"dvertising media
Phase : Phase <
9aggards "mbitious 9aggards "mbitious
ill
oard1hoardings @ow @ow 2igh @ow
Television @ow 2igh @ow @ow
eb ased Gone 2igh Gone @ow
$adio @ow @ow 2igh @ow
agaKines @ow Gone 2igh Gone
"dvertising 2reaku!
The above table is a rough estimate of the proportions of various media used for
promotion #n the first F months ambitious of each segment are targeted 'ne common
characteristic would be preference for non traditional media hence the promotion
methods place a heavy emphasis on the television and web based media ,resent time
radio makes sense as it is considered non traditional particularly % channels
!t the same time the emphasis on bill board3 radio and magaKine advertising is kept low
as these may impact laggards to a greater degree as compared to ambitious
!fter the first F months that is in the second phase of launch there would be a heavy
focus on radio magaKine and bill board form of advertising *imultaneously reducing
time on television and web based forms This is expected to impact the laggards
,. 4uggested Promotional *ethods
The initial phase can be done by promoting TT as a drink for celebrating small happy
events that are personal and also shareable VT should be promoted as the ideal drink for
such occasions The tag line may be /(ar >hushi me ek mithas hai1/ Vanilla Tinge
should be targeted to urban markets showcasing the subtle typical 4#ndianA daily happy
""
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 12/15
moments common to all such as 3 4! girl smiles to a boyA3 4!ppreciation by bossA3
4#ndia wins a matchA3 4small anniversariesA etc
The above !romotional cam!aign !rovides a carbonated drink for above mentioned
needs' &hich have not been targeted b an of the e-isting similar !roducts in
e-isting markets !resentl.
IV. Financials;
The numbers for TT are forecasted in the following manner/
". Phase :
• *ale of carbonated beverages as a J of total beverage sale (59.< million units
approximately3 8;J of the total beverage sale)
• ! niche beverage sale that resembles the new product being launched specifically
in the novelty factor rating is identified 2ere it is assumed to be the sports based
energy drink in #ndia
• &stimate J contribution of the sale of this drink to the total carbonated beverage
(!pprox L""J)
2. Phase <
• &stimate the population of the major metros3 and find out the distribution among
the different age groups (8; million)
• #dentify the estimated siKe of the target age group (The age group ".-.6 years
approximately 5;J e0uals ". million)
• !ssume the sale of TT to be to the same J of this age group as contributed by the
sports based energy drink to the total carbonated drink sales ("J of ".
million)The reason being3 this group would logically comprise of a higher
fraction of adventurous oriented potential consumers who are the target during
the first phase of launch.
".
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 13/15
4ales Forecast )millions of units+
Year 2009 2010 2011
First 6 months Last 6 months
Sales - Units (Total) 1.2 2 2.75 3.025
Breakup
A!entures 1.2 0 0 0
La""ars 0 2 2.2 2.42
Follo#ers 0 0.5 0.55 0.605
4ales etails;
• %irst F months sale has been assumed to the adventurous of the target age group
• ,ost Fth months it has been assumed that the remaining J of the target age group
shows a .J conversion rate
• BoB growth has been assumed at the industry standard of ";J C!?$
,-!ense 2udget )Figures in *illion' I0R+
Sales $e!enue 12 20 27.5 30.25
Total %&penses 3.024 2.64 3.63 3.993
Breakup
'romotion 2.88 2.4 3.3 3.63
istriution 0.12 0.2 0.275 0.3025
$a# *aterial 0.024 0.04 0.055 0.0605
,-!ense etails
• Cost1 Enit has been assumed the same as existing classic coke($s";)
• The cost of raw material has been marked over the existing breakup for coke
taking into account increased cost of vanilla #nstead of "J of the sales price it
has been doubled
• ,romotion expenses have been assumed to be .<J of the total sales revenue again
doubles the existing breakup since it is planned to aggressively promote only in
the first F months
"5
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 14/15
• istribution cost again industry standards "J of total sales This is a source of
com!etitive advantage as e-isting distribution net&orks can be leveraged
The above analysis indicates a margin of H<J Capital expenditure is not factored in3
however it is assumed that no huge expense would be incurred as an existing line
intuitively may be easily customiKed for manufacture of TT #f that is factored3 margins
are estimated to drop down to F;J which is the current industry standard for carbonated
drinks
V. Reference 9inks
*econdary3 desk research was done %ollowing are reference links
" http/11wwwgooglecoin1searchMhlLen:clientLfirefox-a:rlsLorgmoKilla/en-
E*/official:0LcokeNvanillaNwhyNdidNitNfailNindia:startL.;:saLG
. http/11sxtcglobaltypepadcom1myOweblog1articleO6OwhyOvanillaOcokeOwontOwo
rk1indexhtml5 http/11wwwmarketingprofscom1F1mininni.aspMspL"
8 http/11wwwicmrindiaorg1casestudies1catalogue1arketing"1VanillaJ.;Coke
J.;!htm
< http/11wwwicmrindiaorg1casestudies1catalogue1arketing"1DT!;;.htm
F http/11www"economictimesindiatimescom1articleshowarchivecmsM
msidL""95.H5
H http/11marketingpracticeblogspotcom1.;;F1".1vanilla-coke-wakawhtml
9 http/11wwwicmrindiaorg1casestudies1catalogue1arketing"1VanillaJ.;Coke
J.;J.;htm
6 http/11wwwindiantelevisioncom1mam1special1y.k81wakawhtm
"; http/11marketingpracticeblogspotcom1.;;F1".1vanilla-coke-wakawhtml
"8
8/9/2019 Evaluating Brand Extension - Coca Cola_Srikant Rajan_IFMR
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluating-brand-extension-coca-colasrikant-rajanifmr 15/15
"<