evaluating library capacity to manage research data

20
Evalua&ng Library Capacity To Manage Research Data Sheila Corrall Chair, Library & Informa4on Science Program University of Pi<sburgh

Upload: charleston-conference

Post on 25-Jun-2015

64 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Sheila Corrall (speaker)

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Evalua&ng  Library  Capacity  To  Manage  Research  Data  

Sheila  Corrall  Chair,  Library  &  Informa4on  Science  Program  

University  of  Pi<sburgh  

Page 2: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

The  Context  •  Advances  in  networking  

–  Cyberscholarship/e-­‐research/digital  humani4es  

•  Developments  in  research  policy  – Open  access  and  data  sharing  

•  Calls  for  libraries  to  step  up  to  the  data  challenge  –  Conflic4ng  opinions  on  competence  for  the  role  

–  Perfect  fit,  or  over-­‐promoted?  

Page 3: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Libraries,  Librarians,  and  Data  .  .  .  “Our  unique  exper4se  in  metadata,  digital  preserva4on,  public  service,  and  technology  transla4on  will  serve  researchers  well,  as  will          our  sturdy  common  sense  and        the  domain  exper4se  of  our    subject  librarians.”      (Salo,  2010)    BUT,  what  about  .  .  .    technology  competence?  disciplinary  know-­‐how?  

Can  Libraries  Cope  with  e-­‐Science?  

Page 4: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Assessing  Library  Capacity  for  Data  

Our  people  are  our  greatest  assets,  but  .  .  .  we  need  to  look  beyond  knowledge  and  skills  

Libraries  have  other  hidden  Intellectual  Assets  

.  .  .  embedded  in  our  dis4nc4ve  ways  of  working  

ü Organiza1onal  or  Structural  capital    

ü Rela1onal  or  Network  capital  

Page 5: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

What  Are  Intellectual  Assets?  

•  Sources  of  probable  future  compe11ve  advantage,  that  lack  physical  substance,  but  can  be  retained  and  “traded”  by  an  organiza4on  or  service  ins4tu4on  

•  Intellectual  assets  include:    –  human  resources  and  capabili4es    –  organiza4onal  or  structural  competencies  (databases,  technology,  rou4nes,  and  culture)  

–  rela1onal  capital:  customer  and  supplier  networks    

Intellectual  Assets  and  Value  Crea0on  (OECD,  2006)  

Page 6: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Why  Bother  With  Intellectual  Assets?    

•  Understanding  your  structural  and  rela4onal  assets  helps  you  to  realize  the  value  of  your  human  capital  –  and  how  they  can  be  used  to  create  service  assets  

Reveal  Your  Hidden  Strengths!  

Human  Assets  

Rela1onal  Assets  

Structural  Assets  

Service  Assets  

Page 7: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

How  Can  Intellectual  Assets  Support  Research  Data  Management?  

•  Knowledge  of  these  hidden  intangible  resources  –    which  are  o^en  taken  for  granted  –  will  enable  you  to:    –  recognize  unique  and  dis4nc4ve  assets  that  make  libraries  stronger  service  organiza1ons  

–  iden4fy  factors  that  are  helping  or  hindering  your  efforts  in  the  research  data  arena  

–  establish  an  ins1tu1onal  leadership  posi1on  in  the  stewardship  of  research  data  

Page 8: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Where  Can  We  Find  Our  Profession’s  Intellectual  Assets  (IAs)?  

Three  categories  of  IAs  or  Intellectual  Capital:    

o  Knowledge,  skills,  and  know-­‐how  that  staff          “take  with  them  when  they  leave  at  night”  à  Human  Capital  

o  Capabili4es  that  stay  with  the  firm                                      “a^er  the  staff  leaves  at  night”  à  Organiza1onal  or  Structural  Capital  

o  External  rela4ons  with  customers,  suppliers,          and  R&D  partners    à  Rela1onal  Capital  

Page 9: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

?      ?      ?      ?      ?  Which    Human  Assets  Can  Libraries  Exploit  In    Research  Data  Management?    

o  experience  in  collec4on  building  

o  skills  in  reference  interviewing  

o  exper4se  in  literature  searching    

o  knowledge  of  faculty  research  interests  

o  track  record  in  service  innova4on  

Page 10: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Which  Human  Assets  Can  Libraries  Use  In  Research  Data  Management?    

Repurposing  of  library  human  assets  

− applica4on/transfer  of  professional  knowledge  and  skills  to  emergent  areas  of  prac4ce  

•  using  reference  interview  skills  in  data  interviews    •  using  exper4se  in  collec4ons  to  appraise,  select,  curate  and  manage  research  data  sets  

•  using  literature  search  know-­‐how  in  new  ways  .  .  .  

Page 11: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

“the  subject  librarian…  searched  published  literature    

and  other  resources  to  select  the    most  appropriate  metadata  schema.”  

Purdue  University  Libraries  (Bracke,  2011)  

Exploi&ng  Library  Know-­‐How  “The  informa4onists  are  researching    

which  metadata  schema  will    work  best  for  this  project.”  

U  Rochester  Medical  Center  (Hasman  et  al.,  2013)  

Page 12: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

?      ?      ?      ?      ?  Which    Structural  Assets  Can  Libraries  Exploit  In    Research  Data  Management?    

o  subject  liaison  librarian  system  

o  func4onal  specialists  and  coordina4ng  roles  

o  ins4tu4on-­‐wide    working  groups  

o  web-­‐based  tools  

o  ins4tu4onal  repositories  

Page 13: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Which  Structural  Assets  Can  Libraries  Use  In  Research  Data  Management?    

Development  of  library  structural  assets  

–  extending  and  growing  systems  and  remits  

•  adding  data  liaison  to  liaison  librarian  role  •  using  LibGuide  system  to  produce  DataGuides  

•  crea4ng  RDM  coordina4ng  groups  and  posi1ons  

•  using  ins4tu4onal  repositories  as  launchpad  for  data  repositories  

Page 14: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data
Page 15: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

?      ?      ?      ?      ?  Which    Rela&onal  Assets  Can  Libraries  Exploit  In    Research  Data  Management?    

o  personal  contacts    o  service  reputa4on  o  informa4on  literacy  teaching  collabora4ons  

o  digital  service  partnerships  

o  communi4es  of  prac4ce/interest  in  the  profession  

Page 16: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Which  Rela&onal  Assets  Can  Libraries  Use  In  Research  Data  Management?    

Exploi4ng  library  rela4onal  assets  

–  taking  advantage  of  reputa4on  and  goodwill    •  using  personal  contacts  to  recruit  researchers  to  trial  pilot  data  services    

•  building  on  collabora4ons  to  partner  tech  services  on  providing  data  infrastructures  

•  using  professional  networks  to  access  exper4se  and  community  data  resources  (e.g.,  DMP  Tool)      

Page 17: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data
Page 18: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Task  Forces  Rou4ne  prac4ces  Community  toolkits  Subject  liaison  system  Func4onal  coordinators  Ins4tu4onal  repositories  

Collec4on  &  Service  Assets  Data  management  plans  Data  cita4on  metrics  Data  repositories  Data  cura4on  Data  literacy    

 

Transferable  skills  Teamwork  tradi4on  

Professional  knowledge  Mul4disciplinary  exper4se  Ins4tu4onal  understanding  

Personal  contact  Service  reputa4on  

Professional  networks  Librarian-­‐faculty  partnerships  

Library-­‐technology  collabora4ons  

Intellectual  Assets  Suppor&ng  RDM  

The  Big    Picture  

Page 19: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

It’s  Not  All  Good  News  .  .  .  

Some  libraries  have  Intellectual  Liabili&es  

•  Knowledge  and  skills  gaps  and  shortages,  e.g.,  research  know-­‐how  

•  Dysfunc1onal  structures,  defec4ve  infrastructure,  e.g.,  specialist  silos  

•  Poor  networking  and  rela1onship  management,  e.g.,  limited  academic  engagement  

Do  You  Have  Work  To  Do?  

Page 20: Evaluating Library Capacity to Manage Research Data

Sheila  Corrall  scorrall@pi<.edu  

Any  Ques&ons?  Professional  Know-­‐How  

Working  Rela1onships  Organic  Structures  

Networks  of  Collabora4on  

Pushing  the  Boundaries  

Individual  and  Collec4ve