evaluating soil phosphorus and surface runoff phosphorus ... · pdf fileevaluating soil...
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluating Soil Phosphorus and Evaluating Soil Phosphorus and Surface Runoff Phosphorus Surface Runoff Phosphorus
Relationships at the Plot and Relationships at the Plot and Watershed ScaleWatershed Scale
David R. GermanDavid R. GermanDr. Ronald H. GeldermanDr. Ronald H. Gelderman
James R. GerwingJames R. GerwingSouth Dakota State UniversitySouth Dakota State University
Dr. Frank V. SchindlerDr. Frank V. SchindlerSouthwest Minnesota State UniversitySouthwest Minnesota State University
Sources of N and P to Watershedsin Central United States
(1995 GAO report to U.S. Congress)
Atmosphere Fertilizer Manure Point Source
Nitrogen Phosphorus
Manure applications based on the N needs of a crop results in application of P in excess of what the crop can use
In Agricultural Phosphorus and Eutropication. USDA-ARS, ARS-149. July 1999. A.N. Sharpley, T. Daniel, T. Sims, J. Lemunyon, R. Stevens, and R. Parry
In Agricultural Phosphorus and Eutropication. USDA-ARS, ARS-149. July 1999.A.N. Sharpley, T. Daniel, T. Sims, J. Lemunyon, R. Stevens, and R. Parry
Objectives:
• Develop correlation between runoff P and soil test P on select soils of South Dakota using rainfall simulation.
• Relate field runoff to indoor runoff.
Procedures:
• Identify Field Sites• Select Sites ranging
from low to high STP• Use National P
protocol (SERA-17)• Outdoor Rainfall
Simulation• Indoor Rainfall
Simulation
285
6
210
100
34
Moody: Y = 0.0035STP + 0.0687; R2 = 0.93Vienna: Y = 0.0027STP + 0.0772; R2 = 0.94Poinsett: Y = 0.0035STP + 0.1156; R2 = 0.76Kranzburg: Y = 0.0038STP + 0.0055; R2 = 0.77Barnes: Y = 0.0032STP + 0.1155 R2 = 0.76
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Olsen P (ppm)
TDP
(ppm
)
Vienna Moody Poinsett Kranzburg Barnes
A
Field TDP runoff versus STP
Kranzburg: TDP = 0.0059STP - 0.0725; R2 = 0.97Poinsett: TDP = 0.0046STP + 0.039; R2 = 0.97
Vienna: TDP = 0.0025STP + 0.0695;R2 = 0.96
Barnes: TDP = 0.0039STP + 0.03; R2 = 0.91
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Olsen-P (ppm)
TDP
(ppm
)
Kranzburg Poinsett Vienna Barnes
A
Indoor TDP runoff versus STP
Conclusions:
• As STP increases, the amount of phosphorus dissolved P in runoff also increases.
• The increase is linear over the ranges tested.
• Field runoff highly correlated to indoor runoff.
P Loss on a Watershed Scale
• Soil test P vs. Runoff P Relationships on a Watershed Scale.
• Can data from field plots predict P in runoff at the watershed scale?
Watershed size:
• South = 5.17 acres.
• Middle = 5.53 acres.
• North = 5.6 acres.
Olsen STP: .5 acre grid
• South = 112 ppm.
• Middle = 83 ppm.
• North = 72 ppm.
Middle Watershed
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Stage (ft)
Lite
rs/S
econ
d
North Watershed
0505
20253035
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Stage (ft)
South Watershed
05
101520
253035
4045
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8Stage (ft)
Lite
rs/S
econ
d
Middle Watershed
y = 78.767x2 - 4.8367x + 0.2818R2 = 0.9984
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Stage (ft)
South Watershed8/13/06 Event
-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.02
00.020.040.060.080.1
0.120.140.160.18
2:15:0
0 AM
2:45:0
0 AM
3:15:0
0 AM
3:45:0
0 AM
4:15:0
0 AM
4:45:0
0 AM
5:15:0
0 AM
5:45:0
0 AM
6:15:0
0 AM
6:45:0
0 AM
7:15:0
0 AM
7:45:0
0 AM
8:15:0
0 AM
8:45:0
0 AM
9:15:0
0 AM
9:45:0
0 AM
10:15
:00 AM
10:45
:00 AM
11:15
:00 AM
11:45
:00 AM
12:15
:00 PM
12:45
:00 PM
1:15:0
0 PM
1:45:0
0 PM
2:15:0
0 PM
2:45:0
0 PM
3:15:0
0 PM
3:45:0
0 PM
4:15:0
0 PM
4:45:0
0 PM
5:15:0
0 PM
Sample Date
Stag
e
Watershed P Rainfall Events
1.71 1.78
0.77
2.74
6.16
1.07
1.17
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
55.5
66.5
3/1/2006 4/1/2006 5/1/2006 6/1/2006 7/1/2006 8/1/2006 9/1/2006
Rainfall Date
Rain
fall
Am
ount
(inc
hes)
Watershed Runoff vs. Seedbed Plot vs. Mature CornAll 2006 Events
1.4
1.81.6
0.20.2
0.3 0.40.30.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
North Middle South
ppm
Watershed RunoffAll 2006 EventsSeedbed PlotRunoff 6/28-29/06Mature Corn PlotRunoff 8/22-23/06
Watershed Runoff vs. Seedbed Plot vs. Mature Corn PlotRunoff Event April 28-30, 2006
1.4
2.1
1.1
0.3 0.2 0.40.2 0.3 0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
North Middle South
ppm
Watershed RunoffApril 28-30, 2006
Seedbed PlotRunoff 6/28-29/06
Mature Corn PlotRunoff 8/28-29/06
Watershed Runoff vs. Seedbed Plot vs. Mature Corn PlotRunoff Event August 13, 2007
0.6
2.0
1.2
0.3 0.2 0.40.2 0.3 0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
North Middle South
ppm
Watershed RunoffAugust 13, 2006
Seedbed PlotRunoff 6/28-29/06
Mature Corn PlotRunoff 8/22-23/06
Watershed Runoff vs. Seedbed Plot vs. Mature CornRunoff Event September 1-3, 2006
1.41.6 1.7
0.20.3 0.20.20.3
0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
North Middle South
ppm
Watershed RunoffSeptember 1-3, 2006
Seedbed Plot Runoff6/28-29/06
Mature Corn PlotRunoff 8/28-29/06
Watershed Runoff vs. Seedbed Plot vs. Mature CornRunoff Event September 16, 2006
0.0
2.0
1.0
0.20.3 0.2
0.20.3 0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
North Middle South
ppm
Watershed RunoffSeptember 16, 2006
Seedbed Plot Runoff6/28-29/06
Mature Corn PlotRunoff 8/28-29/06
Total Rainfall
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
12:0
0 A
M
1:26
AM
2:52
AM
4:19
AM
5:45
AM
7:12
AM
8:38
AM
10:0
4 A
M
11:3
1 A
M
12:5
7 P
M2:
24 P
M
3:50
PM
5:16
PM
6:43
PM
8:09
PM
9:36
PM
11:0
2 P
M
12:2
8 A
M
1:55
AM
3:21
AM
4:48
AM
6:14
AM
7:40
AM
9:07
AM
10:3
3 A
M
12:0
0 P
M
Inch
es
9/2/069/1/06
Total Rainfall: 6.16 Inches
Rainfall Intensity9/1/06 to 9/2/06
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
12:0
0 AM
1:26
AM
2:52
AM
4:19
AM
5:45
AM
7:12
AM
8:38
AM
10:0
4 AM
11:3
1 AM
12:5
7 PM
2:24
PM
3:50
PM
5:16
PM
6:43
PM
8:09
PM
9:36
PM
11:0
2 PM
12:2
8 AM
1:55
AM
3:21
AM
4:48
AM
6:14
AM
7:40
AM
9:07
AM
10:3
3 AM
12:0
0 PM
Inch
es p
er H
our
9/1/06 9/2/06
Total Rainfall: 6.16 Inches3.47 Inches
1.49 Inches1.20 Inches
Watershed size (acres) and discharge9/1/06 to 9/7/06
5.17 5.53 5.60
2.25 2.53
1.09
0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00
South Middle North
acresinches of runoff
South Watershed 9/1-3/06 Runoff Event
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
5
9/1/
06 3
:36
AM9/
1/06
7:1
2AM
9/1/
06 1
0:48
AM9/
1/06
2:2
4PM
9/1/
06 6
:00
PM9/
1/06
9:3
6PM
9/2/
06 1
:12
AM9/
2/06
4:4
8AM
9/2/
06 8
:24
AM9/
2/06
12:
00PM
9/2/
06 3
:36
PM9/
2/06
7:1
2PM
9/2/
06 1
0:48
PM9/
3/06
2:2
4AM
9/3/
06 6
:00
AM9/
3/06
9:3
6AM
9/3/
06 1
:12
PM9/
3/06
4:4
8PM
ppm
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
feet
Tot Dissolved Phos mg/L (ppm) Total Phosphorus mg/L (ppm) Stage
North Watershed 9/1-3/06 Runoff Event
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
9/1/
06 3
:36
AM
9/1/
06 7
:12
AM
9/1/
06 1
0:48
AM
9/1/
06 2
:24
PM
9/1/
06 6
:00
PM
9/1/
06 9
:36
PM
9/2/
06 1
:12
AM
9/2/
06 4
:48
AM
9/2/
06 8
:24
AM
9/2/
06 1
2:00
PM
9/2/
06 3
:36
PM
9/2/
06 7
:12
PM
9/2/
06 1
0:48
PM
9/3/
06 2
:24
AM
9/3/
06 6
:00
AM
9/3/
06 9
:36
AM
9/3/
06 1
:12
PM
ppm
00.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.82
feet
Tot Dissolved Phos mg/L (ppm) Total Phosphorus mg/L (ppm) Stage
TDP flow weighted concentration (ppm)9/1/06 to 9-5/06
1.90
1.461.64
0.23 0.330.15
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
South Middle North
watershed runoffplot runoff
TDP flow weighted concentration (ppm)9/1/06 first 30 min of runoff
0.86
1.18
0.61
0.230.33
0.15
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.4
South Middle North
watershed runoffplot runoff
Olsen P vs. TDP
R2 = 0.91750.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
0 50 100 150 200 250
Olsen P
TDP North
South
Middle
Vienna
Partners:
• SD Agricultural Experiment Station• SD Dept. Environment and Natural Resources• Water Resources Institute• SD Extension Service • SD Beef Industry Council• SD Corn Utilization Council• SD Soybean Utilization Council• East Dakota Water Development District